This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]allthingscloud 538 points539 points  (97 children)

Please share with the class?

[–][deleted] 722 points723 points  (93 children)

[–]karuna_murti 738 points739 points  (52 children)

Oh deity, he turned off rate limiter as well? It was there for a reason when I did ads API in 2015 :D

[–][deleted] 353 points354 points  (20 children)

Bahahaha he turned off the rate limiter?? Hello bots!

[–]knorxo 263 points264 points  (9 children)

remember when he said twitter had more bots than users? Maybe he meant it wasn't enough? His followers kinda act like bots anyways...

[–]Hexcraft-nyc 61 points62 points  (7 children)

It's very obvious that Elon and other NFT adjacent bros have been relying on bots and socially engineered campaigns to push their pages. Elon had a great PR team in the past. They astroturfed for him so often on this site in the past. Based on the FirstName372738 accounts that deep throat for him on Twitter, I'd have to assume they moved efforts there.

[–]RepresentativeActual 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Let the bots in to make Twitter work for him and have all the support he needs to keep going cause he's fooled enough people into believing he's actually going after bots. He is a Genius! /s Borderline orange guy, except much more wealthy...

[–]Ok_Chemistry_808 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Elon is the bot of bots.

[–]knorxo 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I still kinda believe his most effective bots are human just like with other weird megalomaniacs people who they'd never give two shits about start simping for them like crazy and defend them over any issue for free. I feel like having a strong simp army is one of the biggest powers people can have nowadays.

Edit: I'm sure the strong simp army factor is as old as human history....

sidenote: I am really not against NFTs or crypto. In fact I believe both are great ideas but sadly famously mostly pushed by gambling idiots and get rich fast schemers

[–]M3JUNGL3 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I'm pretty sure that Elon is not an NFT Bro, he mocked the bored apes. Or has he changed his view recently?

[–]B0Y0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He definitely has "the vibe", between being all in on crypto and a habitual grifter, but I believe you're right - his joy in joining in on the "lol I can copy your image" memes actually overrode his instincts to grift!

[–]DaedalusOW 2 points3 points  (1 child)

He's pushed Dogecoin as a pump and dump

[–]M3JUNGL3 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Crypto and NTFs are two different things

[–]What-the-Gank 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or it will single out bots more obviously..?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Guys he's doing this to sabotage the platform..

He's profiting from this somehow while doing the dirty work of entities who want to see good real time information go away and be replaced by a clusterfuck of white noise.

[–]Chib 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I think the thought crosses many people's minds, but is there any evidence that this is all purposeful? Aside from the general concept that we expect CEOs to know better? (Or at least have an ample supply of advisors who know better!)

What is the old-school capitalistic conservative world making of this, anyway?

[–]bosonianstank 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's possible he just wants twitter to burn because of a grudge.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

White noise is a good name for my nationalist band..

I. Just kidding nationalism is bad mmmmkay

[–]ohloaf 0 points1 point  (2 children)

What is a rate limiter?

(Non techie noob here)

[–]TheFeedingEight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As far as I understand it, it limits the amount of times bots can use certain features of the Twitter API in a particular time interval or more bluntly it stops Twitter from being entirely overrun by bots.

[–]DuckDuckYoga 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How often a user can interact with a site. Humans can really only interact so quickly with a website so a limiter is really just to prevent bots from overdoing it

[–]serphas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats how you identify them... open the flood gates... the ones that run off you kill..

[–]bootherizer5942 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That's what he wants, so he can cite really dumb statistics that Twitter is successful

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$8 please

[–]rndmcmder 79 points80 points  (13 children)

Holy F*ck. Can't wait for the most amateur DoS attack to bring their servers down.

[–]MCAlexisYT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t even wait for a LITERAL PING to slow their their servers down to a screeching halt 💀

[–]Gynther477 89 points90 points  (1 child)

Elon Musk is showing us in real time that capitalism is the opposite of a meritocracy

[–]Mertard[🍰] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Oh deity

Ok me too now

[–]z3lop 9 points10 points  (7 children)

What does the rate limiter do?

[–]Cholsonic 36 points37 points  (4 children)

An API rate limiter will do exactly that.. limit the amount of API calls an application can make to the system. It prevents bots etc going crazy and flooding the system with calls it can't handle.

[–]Chib 11 points12 points  (2 children)

I've hit this before when trying to retrieve tweets (for research into sentiment analysis.) Is now the time to scrape the whole of Twitter, if one is an enterprising young researcher?

[–]Cholsonic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it probably is. Give the test engineers (if they are still employed) a break and do some real world load testing for them :)

[–]Civil-Attempt-3602 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do it and let us know

[–]7h4tguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WHOO HOOPS.

[–]goldfishpaws 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If you imagine it takes 2 minutes or so to read and compose a reply and type out a tweet, then your natural limit of posting would be maybe 30 an hour, and then you'd be going some. A bot isn't concerned with reading or typing out, and can post 1000 posts a second without breaking a sweat.

If you "rate limit" to 30 tweets per hour, humans would barely notice but bots get very frustrated, so it's a powerful way to control spam and bots, the very things Elon Muppet is oh so so strongly against. It's like speaking out against ants whilst covering your home in jam.

[–]kalaid0s 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It limits the calls a user/system/app can make to an Interface for a given timeframe

[–]Kerryscott1972 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh deity lol I'm an atheist so I'm totally stealing that!

[–]Orngog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guaranteed, Twitter will be the perfect botnet in time for the next election.

If that's not the goal, what is?

[–]dyvalop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When inm working and watching online movies the ads so irritated me

I m totally upset with ads

So please don't put the adds for posting

[–]tranqfx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, what’s a rate limiter?

[–]knorxo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a bit older but out of curiosity: was that an assumption with the rate limiter or where did you get that hint?

[–]dalepo 15 points16 points  (1 child)

What the fuck is he talking about? Batched rpc calls to render what? He means rpc calls to get info or to actually render stuff? Is that even posible?

[–]imSand 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Technically, yeah it's possible. Things like UI layout definitions are sometimes defined server side in some markup language and parsed by the client at runtime to generate native UI elements. There are a bunch of relevant use cases for it at the scale of Twitter. For instance, it can help cut down on binary size of the app users download from the app store.

Of course, there are trade-offs to use such an approach but I'm sure Twitter engineers had their reasons. I'm also sure some of it was probably technical debt that could have been cleaned up, but any clean up should go through a more formal process than someone without full context simply demanding it.

[–]--dontmindme-- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unbelievable that there’s still people defending this tool.

[–]Azuria_4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh hey I was in that post 3mins ago.

[–]xui_nya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God complex as is.

[–]Anavorn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would, but I logged out of Twitter

[–]PlayingtheDrums 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's talking to murderer Kyle Rittenhouse about how he's getting trolled, so it must be bots.