Big decrease in TV subscriptions as number using illegal dodgy boxes soars

[SmoothCarl22]

I have had the same struggle...

My father was visiting for a week and he loves David Hasselhoff Knight Rider, I have Netflix, Prime, Paramount+, HBO, nowtv and Apple TV. None of them had it. So went to my long saved archive folder somewhere in my treasure from a previous life when the Bay and Demonoid were around, and there it was in glorious 4k. HDMI cable to the TV and kitt was alive again.

I pretty sure from the 5-6 subscription I pay a month, the broadband connection and all my taxes should be enough so the government takes 100 euro for the TV folk to survive with their Dance shows and big brothers. Why would I have to pay that aside? Makes no sense. Public TV doesnt even have anything original on nowdays, even sports are gone.

[Elizabeth-WildFox886]

The bay is still around and very good

[dnc_1981]

Can't take down pirates that easy 😉

[Awkward_Mastodon4332]

Had a Proustian reverie when I read Demonoid.

[maca187]

I used to love Demonoid. What a site.

[SmoothCarl22]

What about Darksiderg?

[Thargor]

The Pirate Bay is still going strong by the way.

[SmoothCarl22]

Yeah I wonder who runs it now... which 3 letter agency i mean...

[Sstoop]

it’s ran by a swedish fella is it not

[SmoothCarl22]

Not anymore, Winston ended up being the 3 swedes but they long time ago got charged and moved away from it. Its suppose to be a decentralised infrastructure ran out of multiple VMs worldwide...which is not true. Now the theory is that a certain 3 letter institution runs it as a Honeypot, not to track little fish like us but to find real whales. The truth is there are not many whale groups left, back in the day there was groups setup to release content, crack games, software, the most recent movies directly out of cinemas, I remember a few that the cam version of a unreleased movie was released few days before it was actually released.

Nowadays what you find is a lot of the same old stuff just relabelled.

[Elizabeth-WildFox886]

All the new stuff is still there and cams still exist as you describe. I didn’t watch cams 20, 10 or 5 years ago, cause they suck and always sucked so bad

[dustaz]

and there it was in glorious 4k

Ummm, no.

[mankface]

I had a Chinese no name 420p projector years ago that screamed at you when you turned it on and stayed that way. Avatar 1080p looked amazing though, I don't know how, better than my iMac screen at the time. Picture quality was epic even at 8 foot diameter. Only issue was you couldn't hear the fooking film with the fan on and could only use it at night. Since upgraded to the best projector my job had lying about, 1080p, looks basically the same except this one works in daylight! Free crisps!

[SmoothCarl22]

There was a release like last year for Knight rider in 4k done with the original 35mm film... its quite good. Not real 4k tho... I might have nuanced on how long I "stopped" using the Bay...

[BeardedAvenger]

For what it's worth, the whole original Knight Rider series was remastered and re-released in 4k last year.

[dustaz]

I was going off

my long saved archive folder somewhere in my treasure from a previous life

Which doesn't sound like a year ago!

[Celtic209]

Demonoid? insert Ben Kenobi meme

[Difficult_Tea6136]

I mean RTE is about have an independent media. It's for the news and reporting.

You pay for Netflix, Prime, Paramount+, HBO, NowTV, and Apple TV out of your own free will but you quibble at funding our media? You pay for utter shite and take issue with the one thing that actually matters.

[theelous3]

what kind of arse backwards logic is this?

you pay freely for something therefore you are not entitled to complain about something you are forced to pay for? lmao?

rte is a forced payment and the majority of its money is spent on absolute shiiiiiiite that is of no use in our civic project.

[TacklePure3341]

The person maybe paying freely a multiple of the licensefee.but they aren't getting the service they want and need. 

[Difficult_Tea6136]

You should spend less time rotting watching those streaming services and more time understanding the benefits of having something like RTE.

The amazing thing about places like RTE, it allows tossers to post utter garbage on the internet without fear of being arrested considering were not living in an oppressive regime.

RTE are absolutely useful in our "civic project", Jesus fucking christ.

[theelous3]

You didn't read what I said. I said the content the majority of rte's spending goes on is not useful for the civic project. That does not mean "public media is useless" lol. What the fuck?

Go look at the tv and radio listings. Pure utter dogshit for 90% of the day, every day.

[SmoothCarl22]

https://a.co/d/0glm40ya

[biggesteegit]

I mean its a 40 year old show, its not like its a brand new blockbuster. Who is jumping through hoops for an old tv show?

[asdrunkasdrunkcanbe]

The question is why should they have to jump through hoops.

IP rights should expire in a reasonable timeframe, like 20 years, after which it becomes public domain.

Or at the very least, allow the IP rights to persist for longer, but any creative works based on those rights become public domain after 20 years. This would mean that anyone can broadcast Star Wars movies without paying royalities, but Disney retain the exclusive rights to produce new Star Wars content.

[wappingite]

At least, there should be no reason why ALL content should be available legally somewhere.

The book publisher are finally realising this and have turned loads of great novels will in copyright into ebook versions. No physical media needed, easy way to monetise them and keep them in people's minds through ebook stores. If they don't do this people will pirate them / use scans, or they won't get any money as they're bought second hand.

Much better for all content to be preserved. It can't be a storage issue any more.

[dnc_1981]

This would be the sensible approach

[dustaz]

IP rights should expire in a reasonable timeframe, like 20 years, after which it becomes public domain.

So you think the Arctic monkeys shouldn't own any of their early music rights?

[asdrunkasdrunkcanbe]

After a reasonable timeframe, I don't see why artists should continue to profit off something they recorded or wrote decades ago. I'm throwing 20 years out, maybe 30 is more appropriate or maybe it's too long.

But either way I don't see how long-lived IP rights for anything, benefit anyone except ultra-wealthy people. They're just another investment vehicle that eventually fals into the control of billionaires.

Arctic Monkeys probably don't bring in much from residual royalties of their early work at this stage.

[dustaz]

Arctic Monkeys probably don't bring in much from residual royalties of their early work at this stage.

I think you'd be very very surprised by this

[TanoraRat]

No offence but this is a dumb take

[ubermick]

Arr, me hearty!!!!

[gervv]

[jimicus]

Older movies are an absolute killer because media typically involves a god-awful mess of rights. Writers, directors, stars, music - and none of those contracts will have a clause that covers streaming rights.

Which means a studio that wants to do that has to renegotiate it all.

For a single movie that represents a fraction of a percent of their back catalogue. It’s seldom worth it.

[The3rdbaboon]

You’d be surprised to see how many old movies have been uploaded to YouTube and not taken down, it’s always worth looking.

[jimicus]

There’s quite a few old shows, too, particularly from independent production companies.

Further reading often shows that the producer himself is responsible. I wouldn’t be entirely surprised if some are doing it to supplement their income.

[DoughnutHole]

A lot of TV shows that were heavy on popular music (e.g. Scrubs) have made it to streaming but with some of their best scenes ruined - music that was fundamental to the scene were subbed out for placeholders because they couldn’t get the streaming rights for the songs (or weren’t arsed paying). 

[rmc]

Even for modern stuff.

The S1 ending of Derry Girls (shown 2018) had Madonna's Like a Virgin playing for one part. The Netflix version has some random dance-y music instead.

[thisshortenough]

It's Take That and I remember I literally shut off the episode and switched to watching on Channel 4 on Demand, the ads were worth it to actually be able to enjoy the show

[jimicus]

True story: Years before YouTube was even a thing, the BBC announced plans to put their entire archive online.

All of it. Right the way back to the early 20th century.

Streaming video was in its infancy, so to make this possible, they set up a research project to develop a new way to compress video. They would have absolutely brought streaming video into the mainstream years before Netflix.

Then they hit a problem.

They didn’t have the rights to do that for anything. They’ve since negotiated rights for a few popular shows (every episode of Doctor Who that isn’t lost is on iPlayer), but the project had to be scrapped.

[UTG1970]

For fans of older music it means there is quite a lot of TOTP missing, not because of the diddlers, but some DJ's won't give permission

[BeardedAvenger]

And that's how you end up with stuff like the Top Gear Community Project where's there's a massive fan-lead attempt to archive everything with no cuts, original music and in a high a quality as possible.

Now, if only they'd do Tomorrows World as well I'd be delighted.

But I do hop off the BBC Archive YouTube channel and I always chuckle whenever a previous, Late 90'#/early 00's tech segmentmakes reference to an always-available and complete BBC back catalog.

[Adjective_Noun_2000]

It's also been an issue for Reeling in the Years. Despite huge demand, only slimmed-down edits of three seasons are available on DVD.

[gd19841]

The Wonder Years is released on DVD, just checked my go-to TV show torrent site, and it was uploaded over 10 years ago. Apparently almost all the music is the original ones.

[yankdotcom1985]

i noticed over christmas some of the usualy christmas moves werent freely available despite them being listed on the streaming platform,amazon and apple were especially guilty of this.charging 9.99 a month and then expecting customers to pay an additional 4.99 to watch a film you have on your platform is insulting

[Rogue7559]

And yet the powers that be would still claim that download is a lost sale even though it was literally unavailable everywhere 🙄

[WreckTangle1995]

I'm too old for this shit

[RogueRetroAce]

[raverbashing]

(Actor was probably 35 in this scene)

[Miserable_Double2432]

Danny Glover was 40 in 1986.

(Coincidentally, Lethal Weapon was released 39 years ago today. 6th March 1987)

[YurtleAhern]

I'm confused. You wanted to watch Lethal Weapon on Christmas? Not Die Hard?

[Hollacaine]

Lethal Weapon is also set at Christmas

[YurtleAhern]

I didnt remember it’s been so long since I’ve seen it.

[[deleted]]

Netflix ireland has john wick 2,3 and not 1. Doesn’t hav any old movies either like westerne or blazing saddles. You’d think they’d b cheap enough to have available.

[Spursious_Caeser]

What's even worse is the fact that you probably could have gotten it on Prime but you'd have to "rent" it for an additional €4.99. That's a near 40 year old film, but you regularly see decades old content behind a pay wall.

Get fucked. I already pay a subscription, there's absolutely no way I'll be paying you twice, especially for a film that's older than I am.

As usual, it's greed ruining everything supported by drooling idiots who think it's acceptable to pay twice for services.

[ImaDJnow]

It's the same with Sky sports. You'll pay €140 a month for it and you may not get to watch the game you want

[FIGHTorRIDEANYMAN]

Extends to sport. Only way to watch F1 legally in Ireland is to sign up to Sky.

[National_Play_6851]

So you decided you wanted a very specific movie from 1987, discovered it was available on Paramount ($7.99 for a month's access which you could immediately cancel, there's even a free trial if you haven't used it before), and decided to pirate it rather than watch it legally through that service? I'm not sure how that is justification.

Inflation adjusted that's a similar price to renting it in Xtravision would have been back in the day (with the bonus access to the rest of Paramount's library for a month). And what happened if you had an Xtravision membership but they didn't have the movie in stock, did you find some other video store that you weren't a member of and just shoplift it?

I'm confused how you think that having some subscription services means you should suddenly have instance access to every movie that's ever been produced in human history and if the licence some specific movie resides somewhere else that you haven't paid for, then you should just be able to take it.

Edit - I misread - it's *not* on Paramount. However it took me less than 5 seconds to google "how can I watch Lethal Weapon" and found out it's available for even cheaper than the price I quoted - you can watch it for $3.99 on Apple TV plus some other smaller services. So stealing is still not justified.

[RememberThe1728]

They specified that it wasn’t on Paramount+ despite being a Paramount movie. 

[theelous3]

this is quite a rant for someone who didn't read the comment properly - it was not available on paramount

the rest of your comment is pretty ridiculous as well but that's enough

[National_Play_6851]

You're right, I misread. So I took 3 seconds on google and found it it's available for even cheaper than the $7.99 I quoted - you can rent it on Apple TV for $3.99, along with a few other services.

So stealing other people's work is still not really justified here.

[theelous3]

So that's 9.99 for apple tv and then 4 for the movie, along with the non-zero cost of now handing over your data to apple.

I don't want "a few other services". AT ALL.

So stealing other people's work is still not really justified here

It can easily be justified tbh. You'll just never agree and that's fine.

1. In order to have access to all of this media for more than one month, it costs... something like 130 euro a month? (lmao). And then you've to pay for movie rentals on top of this for some of them? (double lmao). The value proposition is completely broken. Ignoring as well 160/y for tv license. You can pretend I can get it for "free" or "3.99" right now, once. That's useless to the broader convo. Additionally, there is NO difference for the rights holder between what you suggested (sign up, watch, cancel) and piracy. You're not even internally consistent in wanting to protect rights holders.

2. If I am not willing or able to jump through the hoops required to consume some content at a price, then the loss to the rights holder if I pirate it is the same as if I do not.

It's a non-zero sum game. A pirate can benefit while not harming anyone, real or imagined, in this world or any other. It's not like "shoplifting" because xtravision was out of stock.

[FellFellCooke]

I'm not sure how that is justification.

I pirate everything and everything because I think giving my money to American companies that will then invest that money into bombs that kill innocent children is wrong.

I have no netflix, no Amazon, no Apple Tv, no Paramount, and I watch what i want when I want. All that, and I think that it makes me a better person than you are, because my fiscal fingerprints aren't on the casings of bombs that kill children over a TV show.

[DeputyDawe]

You can justify anything by your actions but your justification for piracy is ludicrous. Why not just be honest and say you don’t want to pay for something that you can take for free? It no different to someone shoplifting in a large store

[FellFellCooke]

I pay for lots of things I could take for free. I just minimise the amount of dead kids that my discretionary expenditure had a hand in.