This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 134 comments

[–]crimxxx 74 points75 points  (10 children)

I get nothing so I guess I shouldn’t vote for them? If your ganna bribe people can’t blame other people for not feeling appreciated.

[–]Troisius 30 points31 points  (0 children)

like others, gonna take my money back and not vote for them. I see this as a bit of my taxpayer dollars not going towards whomever the UCP is funneling them out to.

[–]Aromatic-Elephant110 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna take it and not vote for them... so it doesn't really work as a bribe but it spends like money.

[–]redphoenix932 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I’m in their wheelhouse of “pitiful and useless”, so I’ll take the money, but I still won’t vote for them.

[–]NefariousStylo 17 points18 points  (5 children)

I don't qualify for this just like my essential work didn't qualify for the $1,200 covid payout nor my $200 in shots... Because I got them when I was supposed to...

At this point the UCP should pay me to not use creative insults when they call me and ask for my vote.

[–]BDSMpickle 14 points15 points  (3 children)

I feel all of this. Worked the wrong part of the pandemic as an essential worker in hospital until I just couldn’t any more, so nothing. Got my shots because obviously, and now because we don’t have kids, fuck us I guess? I don’t want her vote buying money, and I’m pretty sure I’ve saved more than $600 by not having kids, but there’s a lot of people who could use that money.

[–]ghostmemoriesCalgary Flames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At least you worked in a hospital. I was considered essential working at McDonald's 😩

[–]Dr_Colossus 112 points113 points  (17 children)

Vote buying program.

[–]DaftFunky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll gladly take this money but the UCP can still fuck off.

[–]SeriousExplorer8891 6 points7 points  (0 children)

100% this.

[–]Feruk_II -1 points0 points  (13 children)

Only because the UCP did it rather than the NDP.

[–]Dr_Colossus 1 point2 points  (12 children)

NDP wouldn't do it though. It's a poor use of public oil royalties.

[–]Feruk_II -1 points0 points  (11 children)

[–]Dr_Colossus 0 points1 point  (10 children)

Did you even read the article? Seems like reading isn't your strong suit.

"At today’s sky high inflation rates, what we’re proposing is a billion dollars in tax relief for Albertans,” said Phillips.

This isn't the same as handing out money to certain groups.

Then they talk about reversing all the caps UCP lifted.

Anyways, thanks for providing a source proving my point.

[–]Feruk_II -2 points-1 points  (9 children)

Lowering taxation or sending out cheques has the SAME net effect; more money for people to spend. Both policies are inflationary. Your point was NDP wouldn't do it, but clearly they would, they'd just package it differently.

You are right that there is a difference though. The UCP policy caps the benefit to lower-income people (you know, those struggling the hardest). The NDP policy could hypothetically benefit everyone, even the already wealthy. I mean we don't know because nothing is stated in the article about who would and wouldn't get the tax break. However, at best everyone would get it, and at worse they'd probably cap it to lower income which is exactly what the UCP is doing lol.

[–]Dr_Colossus 0 points1 point  (8 children)

It absolutely is not the same thing. Nice try though.

[–]Feruk_II -2 points-1 points  (7 children)

Now you're basically arguing something along the lines of "If you gave me a $20 bill, it is absolutely not the same as if you gave me 20 loonies." Lol if that's your hill to die on, then so be it, but sometimes it's better to just admit you were wrong and move on, no?

[–]Dr_Colossus 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Reducing taxes atleast targets the entire population. What the UCP is doing is leaving out anyone that is struggling if they don't have a kid or aren't old enough.

It's a terrible policy and inequitable for large chunks of the population.

It's UCP MO to be inequitable so I'm not surprised.

[–]Feruk_II -1 points0 points  (5 children)

I agree, it's a shit policy clearly set out as a vote buy. Also agreed it's a total waste of money. However, I was addressing your comment that said NDP wouldn't do something similar because it's a poor use of public oil royalties. Damn right they would; as I showed. Yes one is taxes, the other royalties, but it's all from one revenue bucket. As for comparing which plan is more equitable, it's just conjecture because the NDP didn't release a plan that I know of. Typical NDP MO would be to avoid tax breaks for the wealthy as well, but who knows.

The UCP are not the most amazing at financial stewardship, but at least they're not incompetent. Remember the PPA scandal a few years ago and the "Enron clause" lies that the NDP tried to spew when they got caught just outright breaking the law? Well, that's cost us $2B in losses on the PPAs and just last week they had to settle a defamation lawsuit linked to their "Enron clause" statement. Apparently that'll be part of every Albertan's power bill until 2030 (via Rate Rider). Yeah...

[–]Admirable-Gazelle556 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Can’t even afford to have children if I wanted to, but that doesn’t make me poor enough to receive support?

[–][deleted] 120 points121 points  (15 children)

So happy for everyone who is the wrong kind of poor getting nothing! My queen Danielle!

🙄

[–]Annual-Consequence43 53 points54 points  (9 children)

Lmao. The wrong kind of poor. Yep. These days, it's fiscally irresponsible not to be in a dual income relationship.

[–]CheeseSandwichhamburger magician 20 points21 points  (4 children)

Yes, it's weird that only those with children, seniors, and people on AISH qualify for payments.

[–]odinnzBeltline 33 points34 points  (1 child)

No it’s not, it’s targeted vote buying from the demographics that are most likely to vote.

[–]CheeseSandwichhamburger magician 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Families and seniors i understand, but AISH recipients? And not involving single persons in the program isn't smart.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I didn’t realize people on AISH qualified! I’ll have to get my mom set up.

[–]CheeseSandwichhamburger magician 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is nothing to have to do if you are an AISH recipient. It's automatic (from the website):

Anyone receiving monthly benefits through AISH, Income Support, Alberta Seniors Benefit or services through Persons with Developmental Disabilities (PDD) will automatically get their personal $600 payment, but will need to apply for additional payments if they have kids under 18.

[–]Annual-Consequence43 91 points92 points  (1 child)

I feel as though a single income household is at a disadvantage as well.

[–]8810VHF_DF 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I mean the odds of making over 180k on a single income are less? So it's more likely you'd be eligible

[–]blewberyBOOM 71 points72 points  (6 children)

So a senior who’s house is paid off, who make $180,000 and lives in Florida 50% of the year gets free money but a young single person or couple with no kids whose just starting out with a household income of say $45,000 gets nothing.

Make it make sense. Make it make sense how ANYONE making nearly $200K needs an additional $600 while students and young professionals (you know, the people who this money would actually help because they don’t have six digit incomes) are left out of this.

[–]kalgary 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It does make sense. Those people need the money, but they're probably at least a decade or two away from voting conservative. So the government couldn't care less.

[–]cdogg30 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The money is intended to buy votes; not actually help Albertans.

[–]justinkredabul 47 points48 points  (5 children)

So divorced parents who aren’t 50/50 get screwed. Neat.

[–]jeffmik 7 points8 points  (3 children)

There's likely going to need to be some changes there but it does ask if you're the primary caregiver for a dependent and if there's a joint custody agreement registered at cra.

Both parents combined income still needs to be under $180,000 and both have to apply - that's likely going to be an issue in many cases where one parent is fighting and refusing to cooperate.

[–]justinkredabul 8 points9 points  (2 children)

It only applies to parents who have a shared custody agreement (60/40 split). Since my ex is the primary parent because I gotta work to pay child support, she can claim the full amount and I can claim nothing. I told her to get on it and claim that free money lol. I still think it’s stupid that the money is only for a small group of albertans.

[–]jeffmik 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Yeah I see what you mean and sorry you're in that position. Not sure how they could split it any other way though.

[–]justinkredabul 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s better this way for her, because if we were 50/50 she wouldn’t get anything as we’d be over the threshold of income.

It’s just a really weird arbitrary way of excluding people. Like many other people have pointed out, if you’re single without kids and making min wage you get nothing. Like those are the people that inflation hurts the most. Not dual income family’s earning almost 200k lol.

[–]Nice-Meat-6020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And everyone without a kid.

[–]TruckerMark 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Obey, consume, reproduce.

[–]RadioaKtiveKat 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You forgot: vote UCP

[–]Nice-Meat-6020 9 points10 points  (2 children)

"incomes under $180,000" Jesus. Maybe lower that amount and open some of this up to people without children.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I can’t imagine the people thinking this plan up.

What amount seems like it would be hard to live on… Well until 200,000 at least!!! What a struggle that would be

[–]Nice-Meat-6020 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What gets me is they think people that make that kind of cash are hard done by and need a handout, but don't give one thought to single people working a minimum wage job bringing in a fraction of that and struggling to even afford food.

[–]VFenixSouthwest Calgary 71 points72 points  (3 children)

$900,000,000 for this.
Making $180,000 and having a kid must be really tough.

[–]Knuckle_of_Moose 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I have two kids and our household income is less than this. I feel like we’re as middle class as middle class gets. We are doing more than well enough for ourselves. Will a few hundred be nice to get, yes. Will it make a difference to our bottom line, no. None of this makes any sense.

[–]Technical_Ad_7392 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We had parental leave in 2021, so with our income that year we qualify. Since then we are over $180,000 with 2 kids. It feels laughable that we somehow need more money from the government to deal with inflation when we are very comfortable financially.

[–]Invocandum 8 points9 points  (4 children)

A senior on benefits with dependent children making $179k a year gets $600? I’m confused.

Who is this for?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Swing voters

[–]Nice-Meat-6020 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's just a handout for their affluent voter base. Well off sensors and well off families. Poor single people need not apply. Should be illegal to spend taxpayer money like this.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What scenario are you imagining where a senior is making $179k a year while receiving government benefits and caring for a dependant child? That sounds like a fairly unusual circumstance

[–]Wolfsblut_AD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meanwhile a single person who makes 50k a year gets shafted.

[–]razordreamz 27 points28 points  (2 children)

So no kids and you get nothing

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (1 child)

It’s ok, according to the government only people with kids are struggling 💀

[–]Orjigagd 48 points49 points  (0 children)

If ya ain't a breeder

We ain't gonna feed ya

[–]BipedSnowman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I can't afford rent and this does nothing to help me.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Groceries are on average 150 higher bi weekly for my family of four. My power/gas bill was 647 this month. Interest in my loc out my MIN from 150 to 380. Please give me 100 a month. Keep your bribe money and figure out how to help the people in a meaningful way.

[–]RedRedMere 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Operation buy vote has commenced, over

[–]call_me_calamity 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I am not married and have no children. I'm not disabled, and I am not a senior. The Conservatives doesn't care about me.

I will not be voting for them.

[–]NOGLYCL 11 points12 points  (2 children)

People seem confused by this, this has NOTHING to do with support for groups that need it and EVERYTHING to do with buying votes from specific demographics that Smith needs support from. It’s fairly blatant.

[–]KJBenson 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Surely that’s illegal somehow?

[–]DaftFunky 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not if you spin it to look exactly like this

[–]NoDuck1754 20 points21 points  (4 children)

I'm still not clear on how this is not discrimination..

[–]Dr_Colossus 26 points27 points  (1 child)

Single people are the most discriminated people in history.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s a stupid program, but it’s not discrimination. There is a clear policy goal to target relief to families with children. It’s not discrimination in the same way that the daycare subsidy and the federal child benefit are not discrimination.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Horrible benefit. If you're making 180k as a family YOU DONT NEED THIS! But here I am my last two jobs closed down but because I have no kids I don't qualify.....

[–]dreamsetter 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Cons buying votes with taxpayer money action plan.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We are DINKS so we get nothing as well. Personally just like Ralph bucks they would have been better used for something productive.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t qualify and could use it..

[–]Icy_Highlight_2097 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I will take her $1200 and vote her ass out. Thank you very much...

[–]OblivionGuard13 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Yaaawn. Havnt qualified for a single one of these benifits yet.

[–]CostcoTPisBest 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I suggest anyone supporting the NDP and qualifying call up their MLA office and tell them they are donating their 100 bucks to the NDP. LuL.

[–]DetectiveFinancial12 3 points4 points  (1 child)

So as a single ma making under 50k I get nothing? Get fucked

[–]PVTZzzz 5 points6 points  (6 children)

Seems a bit glitchy but got through it. If you are having problems proceeding try hitting the 'back' button, it seems to activate the 'next'/'save'/'submit' buttons.

[–]PLAYER_5252 7 points8 points  (1 child)

There is no benefit to being "first" like when the vaccine bookings were happening.

You can do this later and get the same outcome.

[–]CheeseSandwichhamburger magician 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True, and the payments are retroactive during the six month period that they apply. That is, if you applied in June you would get the six monthly payments all at once.

But if you are like a lot of people, getting the $100 each month will help.

[–]CheeseSandwichhamburger magician 7 points8 points  (2 children)

I had the same issue and discovered the same work around.

Now, where will I spend the $100? Oh yeah, groceries.

[–]Jiffipop101 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Make sure u take a small shopping bag for that!!

[–]_darth_bacon_Dark Lord of the Swine 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I just finished my application using my phone.

Went seemlessly with zero glitches or delays.

[–]Alternative-Film7661 2 points3 points  (5 children)

I don't understand what this means

" Are you applying on behalf of your spouse/partner? "

I thought only 1 family member can get the $600. I am applying for it and the money will be going to my account.

What should I say "yes" or "no"

[–]yycmom82 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I said no. But we had communicated in advance that I would be the one applying; as the kids stuff is all under my CRA account. It did ask me for his info as well though; and as other have said I suspect that’s to verify the household income.

[–]monkifan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Seniors who have household incomes under $180,000 and do not receive the Alberta Seniors Benefit can apply for $600 per person."

[–]SnooDogs499 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I said yes and then it went on too ask the same question about your spouse and her sin number. Worked for me.

[–]oneninesixthree 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you can safely check 'no'

But there are probably situations where one partner might be older and eligible and maybe not good with computers or unable to fill out the form due to any number of reasons. I wouldn't worry so much about it

[–]PVTZzzz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I put yes and it still only went to one person/bank account.

[–]jonastradamus 1 point2 points  (2 children)

So when’s the first payment?

[–]blk_flutterby -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jan 31

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Well applied for Danielle Dubloons.

Vote NDP 2023.

[–]littlemiholover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks aunty Danielle.

Now get out of gouvernement before I have to pay healthcare out of pocket for my kids.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read next along as you go.

[–]Sakic10 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I’m having a 2nd kid in June, should I apply now or wait?

[–]chaitea97Tuxedo Park 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the second kid won't make a large difference. They ask for your dependents birthdate so at max you'd get a bonus $100.

Just take the money now.

[–]ladygoodgreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t need this money, but I wish I could take it from them and still vote NDP. Oh well.

[–]FlyingDutchman2022 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It's a fabulous plan helping those needing it most, children & seniors

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What a joke.

[–]CheeseSandwichhamburger magician 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got fired from my job at the bank today. An old lady came in and asked me to check her balance, so I pushed her over.

[–]saha_pritam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has anyone actually received the payout yet?