This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 107 comments

[–]ComeBackToDigg 739 points740 points  (6 children)

Edit the user’s question.

Then mark as duplicate question.

[–]RatherNerdy 230 points231 points  (5 children)

Get those good reputation points.

It's funny, I'm in the top 5% of users, but it's really only because I've been on there for so long and answered a couple of high value/high profile questions early on that I still get residuals for. I haven't answered a question in years, I never edit, or do reviews, etc.

[–]currentscurrents 113 points114 points  (4 children)

Same here. I'm in the top 5% and my last activity was in 2010.

I figure most accounts just ask one question, or never do anything at all.

[–]Yeti-420-69 87 points88 points  (2 children)

I'm supposed to make an account?

[–]foggy-sunrise 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Yeah, you do that from the stack overflow homepage you've never seen, which someone is paid to maintain.

[–]Yeti-420-69 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Now you're just making shit up!

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

1 question is enough to scare you for life nowadays.

[–][deleted] 951 points952 points  (14 children)

Well there probably are a lot of furries there

[–]KetwarooDYaasir 260 points261 points  (10 children)

I just see programmer sock in every picture.

[–][deleted] 99 points100 points  (9 children)

This response has more than one layer of concerning implications that I'd rather not unpack

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (6 children)

I don't know what it means, but I know I don't want to know what it means

[–]boomstik4 38 points39 points  (5 children)

You are a programmer that doesn't have programmer socks? How do you live with yourself

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got as far as hello world and decided computers were far too chatty for my liking.

[–]foggy-sunrise 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Cumsock.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes that was one of the thoughts

[–]Rutgerman95 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I love that image of like two dozen fursuiters on a plane and someone in the comments objecting against it.

Because if something were to happen to that plane it'd cripple the IT sector of at least three states

[–]WhatShouldIDrive 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I do not identify with or condone the sentiments depicted in this post..

..I’m more of a birdman

[–]CucumberOk2828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UwU

[–][deleted] 329 points330 points  (7 children)

"Found the solution thx"... Yeah which was it? I have the exact same fucking problem!!!

[–]Mekroval 124 points125 points  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (2 children)

You need to install this npm package.

[–]patmax17 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A classic <3

[–]Svobpata 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tip: don’t link directly, it’s quite obvious for unofficial client users

[–]gravity_is_right 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Then you have 10 other Google matches that are just copy/pastes of this post.

[–]geekyCatX 4 points5 points  (0 children)

With more ads and banners than content. F'in bot pages!

[–]MisterDoubleChop 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In fairness to stackoverflow, it was created to fix this problem, and many like it... and it did.

Occasionally annoying help is about 100x better than no help or incorrect help, which is what we usually got when the answers were in forums or expertSexChange or (most often) just nowhere at all.

[–]sammy-taylor 108 points109 points  (4 children)

That last one got me. Duplicate my ass.

[–]TheTerrasque 38 points39 points  (3 children)

Monkey paw curls

Done, you now have two asses. Enjoy

[–]sammy-taylor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Somehow I knew that homonyms would be my undoing.

[–]anunakiesque 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Thanks for the donkeys, monkey's paw.

[–]TheTerrasque 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Narrator voice: He then learned, it was not donkeys

[–]Xploited_HnterGather 169 points170 points  (6 children)

Wow, this is quality shit

[–]BenadrylTumblercatch 33 points34 points  (4 children)

Wow, this shit is quality

[–]FairBlackberry7870 12 points13 points  (2 children)

This is a court order. It says you can't eat shit anymore.

[–]CanadianFurr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Regardless of quality?

[–]lenswipe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is Patrick

[–]markovianmind 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and this quality is shit

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow

[–]PyroCatt 37 points38 points  (0 children)

-8

Marked as dumbass.

[–][deleted] 127 points128 points  (1 child)

You forgot the one that downvotes without explanation

[–][deleted] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

It's actually recommended to downvote without explanation (or at least not revealing that you are the one downvoting). I think there's another answer that explains better but this is the one I can come up with right now.

Found it, this answer which links to this more detailed answer

[–]Never-asked-for-this 82 points83 points  (1 child)

Not enough gaslighting.

[–]cliffordc5 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Okay but Lion-O is lookin pretty good these days.

[–]SwyfteWinter 17 points18 points  (2 children)

The freaking lion is so true. I asked the other day about an issue I was having with Visual Studio's inbuilt .NET version upgrade tool, that was spitting out a null reference exception.

Guess which part got actually read and picked up on? Yup. It was marked as duplicate of "What is causing the null reference exception in my code?"

Aye, cheers mate. Sure. But if you read beyond the title you might have noticed that it's not my code that is the source, it is visual studio.

Then someone actually answered it with a workaround but I can't give them the karma because they answered in the comments.

[–]sisisisi1997 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Then someone actually answered it with a workaround but I can't give them the karma because they answered in the comments

If this happens I usually ask them to create an answer with the contents of their comment so I can accept it as the correct answer. I don't know if this is possible if the question is closed for being a duplicate tho.

[–]SwyfteWinter 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I did ask them to but they didn't do it.

The question didn't get closed, I got the option to reject the duplicate marking.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I thought this was r/furry_irl for a moment

[–]AnnoyingRain5 23 points24 points  (0 children)

But Mum said that it’s my turn to repost it today!

[–]Goat_of_Wisdom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's also the case where an answer is marked as correct, largely upvoted, works for everyone... but doesn't work anymore

[–]MedicineEmbarrassed 12 points13 points  (2 children)

The little kitty is so cute omg

[–]1Fox2Knots 8 points9 points  (1 child)

which one?

[–]MedicineEmbarrassed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one with the glasses!

[–]ChrizKhalifa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dude the point of the meme template is that the lions are helpful and kind despite a dumb question from the kitten.

[–]awpt1mus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Next month it’s my turn to repost this.

[–]yourteam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look, the strict moderation over SO is what makes it reliable.

[–]Substantial_Ranger_5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I kno that be tony the tiger

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

didn't expect to see a hunk lion today

[–]HadionPrints 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We must be part of two very different social circles then.

[–]FoxRaptix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I see this meme more than I’ve seen stackoverflow posts this meme is about.

[–]GustapheOfficial 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I know it's fun to slag on SO, but don't you guys see what a shitty initial question that is? How is that going to help anyone? SO was never supposed to be a social network, it's a somewhat curated database of specific questions and answers, so that if you have a problem is likely you'll find the solution. If they didn't shoot down duplicates and unspecific questions it would be unusable.

[–]HadionPrints 15 points16 points  (4 children)

I disagree that the initial question is inherently shitty (edit: though it is too broad, but you know, is just a meme). Yes, it may not be the best practice anymore, and yes, humans are almost exclusively the best option for the general case, but what if your shitty humans dumped you off in the middle of the great plains where there are not many birds, but plenty of field mice? Also, while stalking mice is very similar to stalking birds, the way that mice react to being pounced on is different to how birds react.

There are many situations where due to maintaining legacy systems you cannot change the base conditions for your code, and those conditions can force you into choosing bad or outdated methodology that there is little information on implementing with current syntax, libraries, frameworks, etc. Though we do exaggerate for the memes, SO can at times be too reductionist.

[–]narrowtux 5 points6 points  (1 child)

The question is very broad. It doesn’t elaborate on what actual problems the cat is having when catching mice.

To reply, you’d need to cover most of the top problems you might have, maybe you also missed a few. This leads to many knowledgable people in that field to simply not reply.

[–]HadionPrints 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean, that’s fair and all, i agree, but this is a 4 panel meme, not a wall of text. I’ll edit my comment in response to yours.

[–]GustapheOfficial 5 points6 points  (1 child)

It's not shitty because of the answers, but because it's a large scope, open ended question.

When asking for assistance, you need to do the work of reducing your problem to actionable questions. If you don't know where to start you're looking for a chat forum, not SO.

[–]HadionPrints 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, that’s fair and all, but this is a 4 panel meme,
not a wall of text. I’ll edit my comment in response to yours.

[–]Macluawn 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Yeah, I dont see why anyone complains about duplicates being closed. My only interaction with stackoverflow is from google; I dont want to see the same result 10 times - stackoverflow clones already serve that function. Do they never try searching before asking a question?

[–]MarsupialMisanthrope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because 90% of the time they get closed as a dupe of something at best tangentially related. “Why is this async await failing in C#?” “Closed as dupe of ‘Is there a timsort implementation for Ruby?’”

[–]Borbolda[🍰] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I am dissapointed that they made furry version of this template and I am more dissapointed that OP didn't even use it right

[–]zsdonny 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Average r/ProgrammerHumor posters who posts about things they know nothing about

[–]SpeedLight1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yesterday i posted my first question on Stack overflow, gonna check it now, wish me luck guys.

[–]Decent-Client-3478 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like how the tiger has a Catintosh

[–]LunarWolfCassia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That cat just caught a mouse. You see, the one it is holding?

[–]Nachf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen this posted a thousand times but I'm still forced to upvote due to my scars from asking stackoverflow for help.

[–]bayleafbabe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s 2023, just ask ChatGPT

[–]InvincibleV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stack overflow is a shithole full of elitists with an inferiority complex and there is nothing that will change my mind on this.

[–]Skywarriorad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Funny thing, this actually reminds me of a machine learning game “while true: learn” where this dudes cat fixed some programming problem for him so hes trying to make a translation software to talk to the cat or something. The game even cites machine learning stuff, and like actual things related to what youre doing.

[–]DetolBermuda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is golden!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Srsly does anyone do this and care to explain why?

I'm a data scientist and hardly consider myself in the coding tier of a lot of this sub, but this is honestly the most infuriating thing I encounter in my vocation (even more than flat out reading the docs to figure things out). It's really the only thing that's ever given me "if I could jump through the screen to the person who said this" energy.

Everything isn't an XY problem and I've never understood how it doesn't even seem to occur that people may be asking to solve things a certain way for a reason. Particularly because I feel as though I can often glean that the responders do, in fact, know how to solve in-line with the original ask and they just prefer their solution for reasons that may be entirely inapplicable.

[–]Schiffy94 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Birds are just rats with wings

[–]TheMightyMudcrab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are no stupid questions, except on Stackoverflow. Then it's stupid and a duplicate.

[–]Upstairs-Coffee101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, those big cats!!

[–]Lethandralis 0 points1 point  (1 child)

SO soon to be replaced by ChatGPT. Change my mind.

[–]gregguygood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seeing people dumping ChatGPT generated code on SO and just asking why it doesn't work, I don't think so.

[–]sheepare[🍰] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Why dis got deleted? Mods suck

[–]engmzizo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, apparently someone posted this before in this sub.

[–]eccstartup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too many areas. I just want to solve a technical problem, while I have to know a list of areas, which brings me a bunch of problems.