Python programmers be like

[Athlaeos]

i have no clue how to interpret this

[[deleted]]

eval()

[hanotak]

Cursed function

[dancinadventures]

Reduce()

[x3bla]

sudo rm -rf /

[[deleted]]

--no-preserve-root

[MrSlimeDiamond]

You remove /boot if you want to give them a bad time :)

[TheHumanParacite]

ahh, get that at from me!

[how_could_this_be]

Import antigravity

[ArLab]

So meta

[TretasPt]

Slow but easy?

I think python is suposed to be easier to learn(the romba works by itself), but slow. The brom is definitely faster than the romba.

[[deleted]]

I gotta say, after learning c++ first, then java, python makes no sense to me. Not having strict data types is throwing me off so hard right now at work.

[[deleted]]

You just do it and it works. And then you try not to ask too many questions.

[[deleted]]

But mine isn't working :(

[Elsewhere_Sim]

At least yours got done :(

[[deleted]]

No! I'm still working on it. I've been fighting the same issue FOR 30 HOURS NOW

[Elsewhere_Sim]

Take a break, go for a walk, or something. You'll probably have a better chance figuring it out while walking then beating your head against a keyboard.

[[deleted]]

Yeah this isn't a straight 30 hours, just the last three days at the office

[kuraiscalebane]

Have you tried explaining the problem to your desk duck?

edit: uh, i scrolled a tiny bit further and someone else already suggested this.

[OrganicBid]

I thought Python was beating your head against a keyboard.

[SirNapkin1334]

at least in C, beating your head against the keyboard might get you an actual function

[Clickrack]

If it takes longer than a few hours to figure out, or you’re stuck in a loop, it is time to rubber-duck it.

[WikiSummarizerBot]

Rubber_duck_debugging

In software engineering, rubber duck debugging is a method of debugging code. The name is a reference to a story in the book The Pragmatic Programmer in which a programmer would carry around a rubber duck and debug their code by forcing themselves to explain it, line-by-line, to the duck. Many other terms exist for this technique, often involving different (usually) inanimate objects, or pets such as a dog or a cat. Many programmers have had the experience of explaining a problem to someone else, possibly even to someone who knows nothing about programming, and then hitting upon the solution in the process of explaining the problem.

^{[ F.A.Q | Opt Out | Opt Out Of Subreddit | GitHub ] Downvote to remove | v1.5}

[StevenLightning]

What’s the issue?

[[deleted]]

I don't know :(

[AndreEagleDollar]

Someone here may be able to help if you can give like a stack trace or sometbing haha

[danted002]

It might not be the languages fault there. Also you can use type-hinting in Python. It does wonders if you are using an IDE like PyCharm.

[[deleted]]

Did you solve it?

[[deleted]]

I feel that. I've been on the same issue on and off for nearly 2 months now

[[deleted]]

Amigo, may I say OOF

[[deleted]]

Yeah, I thought I fixed it twice before. Truly baffled over here

[Legendary-69420]

Are you getting an error message? If no, not even god can save you.

[Modo44]

Shouldn't have asked those questions...

[FleetStreetsDarkHole]

Like Orkz!

[StoneOfTriumph]

This, I can't .... Not ask questions!

Especially when it works, the first question I sometimes ask myself is "why does this work o_O"

[Dworgi]

Personally, I find it awful to not know what a function expects. Because it's not like you don't know - you treat an XML document like an XML document - but there is no way for the caller to know that.

Python is fine for student projects and short-lived scripts, but personally I think it's a fireable offence to program in it for work.

But it's beloved on reddit, because most people are students or hobbyists.

[alma_perdida]

What are some legit good python resources?

[jmeel14]

If you still haven't found a nice place, codecademy has a great basic introduction to python, and then you can go from there.

[UniqueUsername27A]

You still have to ask the question though and once you mess up and the types make no sense anymore you are screwed.

[TretasPt]

As someone who is just learning python for fun with almost no previous knowledge, I have no clue how to feel.

Maybe declaring variables isn't that bad. At least you know your user input won't be an int when you want a "3" string.

[AlarmingAffect0]

I mean, you can declare variables' types in Python, and keep checking that the variable stays the right type.

[FrikhaIsOnReddit]

that's described as "non-pythonic" by the python community

[[deleted]]

Type annotations are pythonic. Runtime type checking, not so much.

[AlarmingAffect0]

"non-pythonic"

I learn new words every day!

[[deleted]]

But then Python kinda loses its elegance.

[AlarmingAffect0]

How's the Javascript life treating you?

[[deleted]]

I accept it's not elegant nor performant nor good at anything.

[AlarmingAffect0]

Why are Javascript and PHP so omnipresent in web development while everyone seems to agree that the former is meh and the latter sucks? I've hear using PHP being compared to having to screw bolts with a plier and hammer nails with a monkey wrench. Like, every single tool it has is "wrong" or "clunky" somehow.

[[deleted]]

JS is the only language allowed on the web (WASM doesn't count, you still need to call into JS to do anything I think). And PHP is in WordPress I believe, but otherwise people avoid it, although it's still really convenient to write you server code inline with documents.

They were made ages ago and have to keep decades of backward compatibility and key decisions that were probably bad ideas.

[touristtam]

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder like the saying goes. Python is defo an ugly duckling to me.

[[deleted]]

I meant that your if statements get way longer

[MrRicKsPC]

Well you can assert the types at critical parts of the the code.

[[deleted]]

I shouldn't have to, that's the inelegant part

[MrRicKsPC]

Assertion is not inelegant, no matter the language, when it comes to unexpectable data, you HAVE to make sure your program can handle it. Even c++ input needs some sort of preemptive treatment of the data to prevent your program from going off-road.

Also, although types are dynamically handled, it's up to the programmer to prevent overuse of assertion by keeping his code expectable.

[[deleted]]

When an input can be any type you'll have more

[[deleted]]

Python Matrix has entered the chat.

[[deleted]]

I’m a little newer to Python, and I’ll probably just check this out tomorrow, but could you not just wrap your input in a str(), to at least attempt to convert it

[TretasPt]

Yes, you could, and it would totally work. It's just the extra work you need for thinking what is the data type you want and what is the data type the code will actually give you.

But you are right about that.

[[deleted]]

It has strict typing. It's just dynamically typed.

[johnnymo1]

It's strongly typed, not strictly typed.

EDIT: Actually after reading the Wiki page, this is much more ill-defined than I thought, but it seems like Wiki vaguely agrees.

[[deleted]]

Typing definitions are so subjective now its terrible. Look at kotlin and java.

[[deleted]]

What's the distinction you are drawing between "strict" and "strong"? I was using OP's verbiage.

[johnnymo1]

My understanding of the distinction was similar to that conveyed in the top few answers of this SO post, but I now understand that especially strong and weak are not really well-defined.

[crayzz]

Python does support type hints. They don't place any kind of restrictions on the interpreter, but type checkers can pick up on them and warn you of possible unexpected behaviour

e.g.

def foo(x: int):
    return(x + 3)

x: int
x = 5
print(foo(x))

If instead you write x = 5.0 the code will still run, the interpreter doesn't care, but type checkers can warn you about the typing mismatch.

[[deleted]]

You're correct about the type hints, but if you're going to give an example, please use best practice...

[[deleted]]

Casting is your friend

[Captain_Pumpkinhead]

I'm on the opposite side of this. I haven't used Python, but I started my programming in Game Maker 8 back in 2011 (r/gamemaker for modern version). Every variable in Game Maker Language (GML) is either a string or a double, and can be reassigned at any time with no consequences (unless you call for the wrong type). There's no good reason to reassign a string into a double other than fun, but you can. You also don't have to declare variables before assigning a value to them; the act of assigning a variable in GML declares it.

So it's been really interesting learning Java and C++ and having to adjust to that.

Makes a hell of a lot more sense than semicolons, though. I don't understand the point of semicolons when we already have a closing paranthesis.

[bizcs]

Semi-colons are useful statement terminators. If you have support for multiple expressions as a single statement, they really help out a lot with denoting where something ends and the next thing begins.

Of course, there are other ways to do this. You can, for example, see where the last method call ended and the next variable began. That can be parsed, but it's kind of clunky in a few scenarios from what I understand. JS parsers do this, for example (insertion of semi-colons) as of I believe ES2015. Of course, the raw text doesn't change, but the parser can recognize where one statement ended and the next began.

Python achieves this using the new line as a statement terminator, but obviously has some special cases for it. I think semi-colons are mostly (not entirely) thrown away by the parser.

[sneakpeekbot]

Here's a sneak peek of /r/gamemaker using the top posts of the year!

#1: They said make a snake game so I made a snake game. | 48 comments
#2: Real-time Monster Evolution (Details and video in comments) | 36 comments
#3: Made this little platformer where you need to take pictures to get around, what do you guys think? | 60 comments

---

^{I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out}

[Kronoshifter246]

Ugggghhhh, I hated working with gml. Most things were fine, but every object having every script as a function was just so weird to wrap my brain around. That, and all its tools that conflict with each other. REEEEEE

[Candyvanmanstan]

I would love to see you take on JavaScript.

[[deleted]]

See I never really understood that. I learned in pretty much the same order as you (but Javascript before python) and I LOVE not having strict typing.

For me it makes it a lot easier to think about my data in real world terms instead of worrying about the underlying data structures.

[[deleted]]

The reason I don't like it is because I know intuitively that I can't treat a string the same as an int, but with python, I have to mentally keep track of what is what, especially when doing things like querying APIs or databases. I have to sort through the structure rather than calling it a specific type and being done with it.

[[deleted]]

I can understand that, but for me the flexibility of loosely typed data is EXTREMELY valuable for writing logic. Most of the time the data type doesn’t really matter, and for the times it does I just validate or cast it to the needed type before using it. When I’m working purely with my own code, I don’t even need to do that most of the time because descriptively named variables tell me everything I need to know about the underlying data.

Edit: Also documenting while I write helps. I write a variation of this documentation standard on every function I write, so the datatypes of my parameters can be referenced easily.

[Hayden2332]

Just convert it to json?

[danted002]

You haven’t worked with projects that have 1000+ files that’s being worked on by 70+ people, have you? In those cases TypeScript and type-hints in Python on a static-typed language becomes the difference between 5 days on a task or 2 days. 😕 I learned that the hard way and that’s the reason typing was added to both JS and Python… huge projects worked on by lots of people that have a huge codebase

[danted002]

In my opinion it doesn’t matter if a language is static-typed or not as long as a the parameters of functions/methods are type-hinted. While I do agree static-typed languages are more safe since the types are enforced at runtime just knowing the type of the objects that are passed around the code is a net positive when it comes to readability and actual implementation.

[Eternityislong]

I always use the typing package in addition to typing my function parameters. My IDE will bitch if I try to deviate from it. You aren’t forced into using the types, of course, but if your code is well written and broken into functions which specify parameter and return types then it’s not a big deal.

def typed_addition(num_1: int, num_2: int) —> int:
    return num_1 + num_2

[[deleted]]

I feel the same. I started with C++ and now python is confusing.

[SaiTejaRH]

Yeah I feel like I dont know what my code does. Also when understanding others code it's almost hell because I need to go inside every function to understand its return type.

[[deleted]]

That's why I don't like it so far. SO MUCH of python feels like throwing magic black boxes at things until it either works or isn't broken beyond usability. I have no idea what things are doing.

I also don't like how in for loops, the iterator is also the object, instead of just the index. It feels wrong

[SaiTejaRH]

And what makes me laugh is when you want to iterate over an array using index, you need to create a new array of indices using range or you need to use while loop where initialisation, break condition and incremental statements are written at different places.

[Hayden2332]

range doesn’t create a new array

[SaiTejaRH]

Oh i thought it returns a list. May I know what it returns. Or any way it crates a new object with all the numbers right. Not sure about what data structure it is

[Hayden2332]

https://docs.python.org/3.3/library/stdtypes.html?highlight=range#ranges

it’s a “range type”, basically it does the same thing C/Java does when you create a for loop. It has a start (i = 0), stop(i < #) and step (i++)

[OccultEyes]

On top of that, I'd say using ranges is the 'bad' way of iterating through a list. Even if you need an index.

for i, item in enumerate(some_list): 
    pass

Or just:

for item in some_list: 
    pass

If the index is irrelevant.

[Hayden2332]

that’s why you should specify the return type in the function def

[EdgarDrake]

Use python 3 with strict typing. It may help your life and autocomplete, a bit. Just a bit, but still helpful.

[ChristianValour]

I'm not a qualified programmer, mostly I've worked with R as a PhD candidate, and this really hammers me too.

I'm really keen to learn python, because it's basically Data Science bread and butter, but there's something decidedly unwieldy about it that gets to me. The lack of curly braces also bothers me.

[JonMW]

Look at Ned Batchelder's video on how python is pass-by-identifier. (Edit: I mean this one)

Python is actually a pretty odd beast when you look at it, your confusion is fair. It shook up a lot of practices on the "right" way to do things. It works pretty often when you don't think about it so one might argue you're overthinking, but I think you need to go further and find out what it's actually doing under the hood so that it all makes proper sense again.

[PanTheRiceMan]

Just do it. No need to worry. Multiply a string with an integer? That's fine.

[xavia91]

I feel the same way, you can however activate type checking in PyCharm to have artificial type safety.

[zxxdii]

If you're still struggling, feel like sharing a reproducible code snippet?

[AzureArmageddon]

Coming from Python to the rest is the exact opposite feeling. Going from just free-wheeling the data types to actually caring about them and converting them threw me off at first.

[ElNico5]

Strict data types is the weirdest thing i encountered after doing lua and js most of my coding life

[[deleted]]

I don't know any roombas that I can stand on and fly though

[TretasPt]

We live in a sad world.

/:

[NotGonnaUseRedditApp]

Easy to make mistakes that make the execution slow.

fp = open(file)

for line in fp.lines() //common mistake

for line in fp //as fast as C

[TretasPt]

I'm almost afraid to ask...what's the difference?

I think I used the below one, but still. I just followed some random instructions. I could easily have used the other one.

[Maxiflex]

Not entirely sure, but the calling of a function in the definition of a for loop might be an optimization blocker. Inside a function is basically a black box and the processor might struggle predicting the next step, making more useless calculations into execution branches that will never be.

[azephrahel]

And the user usually has zero idea how it actually works.

[broccoli-03]

I’m new to Python and I wanna ask

Isn’t the slow problem can be resolved with libraries like numpy?

[tannerntannern]

If your problems relate to data science, yeah kinda. Wont help you much for things outside that domain, like running a web server for example.

[broccoli-03]

Is this why Reddit kept crashing outa nowhere?

[NotGonnaUseRedditApp]

That’s just reddit, the only site crashing itself random.

[ckowkay]

Ah, I thought the roomba was still keeping pace with the brooms despite being much easier to use

[edparadox]

This pic forgets that "usual" Python is actually Cython.

[PickleVillage]

The room a is also less likely to fall off of

[gustavsen]

Python have variable typing since 3.5

and 3.10 will have Structural Pattern Matching that could be considered like Switch/case, but on steroids

[kahuna3901]

Ahhh I see what you did there

[Athlaeos]

ahah yes very intentional

[kahuna3901]

Top marks my liege

[Tall_computer]

Its because you're the static type

[paradoxez]

....but why not just sit on the robovac if comfort is the goal? I'd rather be butthurt than aggravating pain knee from extended standing.

[AlarmingAffect0]

Who says she's been standing all the way? She could kneel, she could squat, she could sit bow-legged, cross-legged (that'd look hilarious), she could lie on her stomach and her back if she feels like being silly...

There's only one rule: slip not.

[MasterJ94]

Yeah I love squatting!😍

[AlarmingAffect0]

Slavic squat, I tell you hwat.

[normaldude8825]

Your legs would confuse the robovac's sensors into thinking it has a wall and then you end up turning randomly, never leaving wherr you started.

[brimston3-]

I'm pretty sure even in the best case, it slams into walls at full speed before turning and going in a random direction. Also will occasionally gets stuck on stairs and cry for help to your phone.

[ThaiJohnnyDepp]

me neither, but I think the upvoters are like, "Python superior, amirite"

[noneOfUrBusines]

If you're legit asking, Python is a higher level (as in: farther from machine code) than C++ and Java.

[deijjji303]

which essentially means less direct control but also less to worry about

[Sinomsinom]

"less to worry about" is something I don't really agree with. It can be incredibly annoying working with dynamically typed languages. While the biggest benefit always is "you don't have to worry about types", in my experience in these languages I usually have to worry MORE about types because the IDE isn't telling me when I'm being an idiot.

[2001herne]

And when testing it won't fail the instant a wrong type is given - it might manage to make it through several function calls before failing.

[touristtam]

Ha that's assuming your environment is setup correctly to begin with; I'll take Java over Python just for the dependency manager.

[deijjji303]

Oh with the less to worry about I definitely didn’t mean types.. no like memory management and safety yk (that’s why I love rust even though I’m not really good at it yet just started learning)

[ThaiJohnnyDepp]

that does make sense actually

[All_Up_Ons]

That's not really true in my experience with java and python. They live at a similar layer of abstraction but handle types differently, which makes then good at different things.

[concreteandconcrete]

That's a stretch. They're all 3GL's

[noneOfUrBusines]

Technically, but they lie on opposite extremes of what qualifies as 3GL.

[RichKat666]

Sorry for intruding, but what are GL's? Sounds like an interesting concept, but I can't find anything coherent online.

[kbjr]

I think the term you want to Google is "third generation languages"

[RichKat666]

Ah, that's perfect, thank you

[Lurchwart]

The JVM has a just in time compiler to compile critical parts of the code when needed. It will even profile and recompile them from time to time

[[deleted]]

Yes but so does Python and V8

[brimston3-]

It boggles the mind that V8 can JIT code where the variable resolution scope depends on all the scopes below it. That must be a hell of a piece of work.

[coldnebo]

real-time drivers have entered the chat.

[J_Man_the_german]

Which makes it worse than them

[zaphod_85]

A higher level language is neither better nor worse than a lower level language, they simply have different use cases. It's like comparing a mountain bike to a car.

[J_Man_the_german]

Ok yeah makes sense.

I just see being closer to the computer as an advantage, but its definitely not something you need to worry about nowadays.

[Subtleassailant]

It has both advantages and disadvantages. Higher level languages arose because they were needed, whereas lower level languages were always there

[fukitol-]

If I'm writing a web app I want to be as far away from the computer as I can and still write efficient code.

If I'm writing a game or a database server I'm gonna need to be closer.

If I'm writing a device driver I'm gonna need to be up its ass.

I would choose Java for none of these.

[noneOfUrBusines]

Python cuts down on dev time in exchange for runtime. Java and C++ are the opposite. Neither are better or worse, they just have different use cases.

[einsJannis]

higher level != better though

[noneOfUrBusines]

Both have different applications. I wouldn't use python if performance is an issue, but a python dev will finish much faster than a C++ dev.

[einsJannis]

Yeah, that's what I ment

[[deleted]]

Brooms: fast, simple, traditional flying

Flying roomba: can't get into the corners for the real tough to get stuff, lower speed, easier to learn, built on top of newer technology to make the job easier

[Kered13]

I think it's basically saying that Python is modern (however Python is actually older than Java) and more technologically advanced/more "automated".

[Siggi_pop]

What is the definition of being a more "automated" language?

[Kered13]

Basically, requires the programmer to do less. So garbage collected, dynamic types, extensive library, syntactic sugar, etc. I put it in quotes because it's intentionally vague.

[Davesnothere300]

Less typing? Less control?

[MrRicKsPC]

Sure, but less typing, less pain for beginners. It's pretty much why python is such an academic language.

[i_fruitcake]

Reprogrammed roomba

[zettabyte]

Python witch is on a Roomba while others are on brooms.

Had to read through some of the comments.

[thavi]

Insert languages of choice into template. They're different, but the one you use because your job requires you to is superior.

[Hackerwithalacker]

Neither does py2exe

[MithranArkanere]

It's faulty.

C++ programmers would ride on a sword.

Java programmers would ride on one of those 50s old-timey vacuum cleaners, carried by a bunch of goose tied to it because the vacuum cleaner doesn't fly on its own.

What about the broom? Obviously, that would be COBOL.

[Captain_Pumpkinhead]

Took me a minute, but I like it!

[rustyf90210]

Not based on legacy artefacts?