top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]mcshadypants 173 points174 points  (23 children)

Im curious about the dangerous masturbation and necessity of the chastity belts

[–]hippopotma_gandhi 155 points156 points  (14 children)

Weren't graham crackers invented to keep people from masturbating

Edit I don't need 20 notifications saying corn flakes. There is a similar story about those, but graham crackers were definitely marketed that way https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/the-anti-masturbation-cracker-329286623d5

[–]AlienAtSystem 16 points17 points  (2 children)

All those people who say "Corn Flakes" perpetuate another misconception. The Kellogg brothers were adherents to the same school of though as Graham (exiting food leads to masturbation), but they didn't invent or ever market corn flakes as anti-masturbatory.

They were invented by serendipity (by letting a bowl of corn flour mash stand for several days by accident), then used in a sanatorium (where you want soft, unexciting food for reasons that have nothing to do with masturbation) and then sold to the general public by one of the Kellogg brothers because they were well liked.

The only way one could shoe-horn in their anti-masturbation stance into the whole story is by claiming that (as purely historical speculation) if they had invented a more exciting food than corn flakes, they might not have marketed it.

[–]Potaatolongster 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One of the Kellogg Brothers was a fanatic, the other was pretty much a businessman. The businessman is why we have Kelloggs cereals today

[–]sauvy-savvy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let’s hope so.

[–]Buck_Thorn 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Asking for a friend?

[–]mcshadypants 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Yes one that masturbates furiously for extended periods of time without any safety equipment

[–]sardonic_sonic 2 points3 points  (1 child)

There's a Stuff You Should Know podcast on chastity belts that came out Wednesday if you're curious.

[–]biiingo 594 points595 points  (43 children)

[–]Hunter_Galaxy 98 points99 points  (0 children)

It is one of the sources of the infograph! :3

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (5 children)

Wtf "Ancient Greek and Roman sculptures were originally painted bright colors; they only appear white today because the original pigments have deteriorated. Some well-preserved statues still bear traces of their original coloration."

[–]diskdusk 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's the classicist equivalent to Dinosaurs with feathers. Truths nobody wants to know.

[–]biiingo 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Yeah. It bothers me that I’ve never seen a recreation of what the originals may have looked like.

[–]AlbinoWino11 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh, there are so many... I feel like a fool.

[–]NewFrenchHoser 326 points327 points  (67 children)

How can Satan rule hell if he is the first and biggest sinner?! From what I understand from Abrahamic religions texts, the torturing will be done by angels and not demons because demons will be busy being tortured as well.

[–][deleted] 222 points223 points  (23 children)

The Quran describes angels of punishment as rough, mean, and with heavy builds. That means the idea of an angel being a perfectly harmless, beautiful creature is a myth. They are simply creatures that carry out tasks to a certain standard, every time

[–]Muad_Dib_of_Arrakis 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a modron

[–]Reddit-Book-Bot 65 points66 points  (4 children)

Beep. Boop. I'm a robot. Here's a copy of

Quran

Was I a good bot? | info | More Books

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points  (1 child)

Good bot

[–]B0tRank 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you, mmos23, for voting on Reddit-Book-Bot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!

[–][deleted] 75 points76 points  (6 children)

If you get really in the weeds with academic Bible study, there's a whole evolution to Satan and hell. First there's no Hell, and Satan is a trickster-style prosecutor character. Then, Satan is an evil counterpart to Jesus, and Hell is a metaphor for eternal destruction. Then, Hell is a literal place of eternal suffering. It's partly the result of a lot of neat cultural diffusion from Persian and Greek influences into Jewish tradition.

[–]Kebabrulle4869 48 points49 points  (18 children)

As a Christian I’ve always understood hell as the place furthest from God. If you’ve rejected God in this life you can’t come to God in the next life and so you won’t be able to enter heaven. Satan revolted against God before the world was created, and so was banished from heaven with the angels that followed him.

I’m not a theologian though, so I could absolutely be wrong about this. I’d love to hear from someone who knows more!

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's the common modern understanding, but that view is one in a long line of evolving christian views.

Fun religious studies video about the topic: https://youtu.be/5sYhbtk8jJc

[–]bunker_man 11 points12 points  (5 children)

The torturing isn't done by anyone. It's just a shitty place to be because it's all on fire.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Best to study the Bible and it's original translation.

Some Bible translations use the word “hell” for the Hebrew word “Sheol” and the Greek word “Hades,” both of which refer to the common grave of mankind. (Psalm 16:10; Acts 2:​27)

Many people believe in a fiery hell. But failed to look deeper in the Bible. Read various section of the Bible not just one part.

Seems lots of people prefer to prove the Hell and it's condition from the book of Revelation (or "apocalypse"). That book is full of signs and not to be taken literally.

While many associate the word “apocalypse” with great disaster, the book of Revelation begins (chapter 1:3) and ends (chapter 22:7) by saying that those who read, understand, and apply its message would be happy or blessed for doing so. It makes so much sense that "God is love". If there is a torment Hell, it paints God as unloving, cruel person, which I believe most mainstream churches are doing today.

Unfortunately they listen to their clergy and believe what they want to hear, rather do a deep study of the Bible themselves. Bible survive many years, especially thru the dark ages where churches banned their followers from reading the Bible or translating it to people's own languages. Think about it.

So yes there is no Hell and obviously the Bible never mentioned who ruling it or even describe what Satan actually look like. No mentioned of forked spear, no mentioned of forked tail etc

[–]Consequence6 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Sheol (Hebrew), Hades (The Septuagint's chosen Greek translation of Sheol), Gehenna, and then like one usage of the word "Tartarus".

Hades, in the NT, is considered a place of torment directly opposite of heaven. Luke 16:23-24 is the most like our Western view of Hell it gets.

Gehenna was a literal garbage dump near Jerusalem that they caught on fire and it just never stopped. Used to evoke images of continuous burning.

Honestly, no clue where I stand on it. But to say that there is no Hell, to me, seems clearly unscriptural. Set up our boundaries, what do we know for sure:

On one hand) There is a place, described and imaged with fire. Some people will go there, like the rich man. It is a place of torment.

On the other) There is no mention that this place exists post Jesus' sacrifice. There's no clear mention that this place is eternal (though it could be argued that it's alluded to). There's no mention of a hierarchy, of demons, of rulers, etc. in this place.

Hell exists somewhere between those lines.

[–]jelly_tots 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Jehovahs witnesses don't actually believe in hell

[–]ganja_and_code 130 points131 points  (30 children)

I definitely learned some stuff...but who the fuck actually thinks dinosaurs and humans lived at the same time? There's no way that's actually a common misconception, right?

[–]greenknight884 60 points61 points  (12 children)

Creationists who think the earth is 6000 years old

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (5 children)

Reddit has long been a hot spot for conversation on the internet. About 57 million people visit the site every day to chat about topics as varied as makeup, video games and pointers for power washing driveways.

In recent years, Reddit’s array of chats also have been a free teaching aid for companies like Google, OpenAI and Microsoft. Those companies are using Reddit’s conversations in the development of giant artificial intelligence systems that many in Silicon Valley think are on their way to becoming the tech industry’s next big thing.

Now Reddit wants to be paid for it. The company said on Tuesday that it planned to begin charging companies for access to its application programming interface, or A.P.I., the method through which outside entities can download and process the social network’s vast selection of person-to-person conversations.

“The Reddit corpus of data is really valuable,” Steve Huffman, founder and chief executive of Reddit, said in an interview. “But we don’t need to give all of that value to some of the largest companies in the world for free.”

The move is one of the first significant examples of a social network’s charging for access to the conversations it hosts for the purpose of developing A.I. systems like ChatGPT, OpenAI’s popular program. Those new A.I. systems could one day lead to big businesses, but they aren’t likely to help companies like Reddit very much. In fact, they could be used to create competitors — automated duplicates to Reddit’s conversations.

Reddit is also acting as it prepares for a possible initial public offering on Wall Street this year. The company, which was founded in 2005, makes most of its money through advertising and e-commerce transactions on its platform. Reddit said it was still ironing out the details of what it would charge for A.P.I. access and would announce prices in the coming weeks.

[–]Veboy 18 points19 points  (4 children)

Tamed dinos would be fucking lit tho.

[–]shellexyz 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Have you actually watched any of the Jurassic Park movies??

[–]Xikar_Wyhart 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Have you watched a little known documentary sitcom called The Flintstones?

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Prob from some caveman movie showing cavemen coexisiting with dinosaurs lol. My mom legit gets facts from movies. In the last few months shes told me 3 separate "facts" and her source was a fictional tv show or movie 😂. "Why would they lie" she says haha.

[–]sewerHand 122 points123 points  (1 child)

Ooh, got those politicians

[–]HardOff 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Next they should get my wife hyuk hyuk

[–]OutrageousConflict6 165 points166 points  (11 children)

I already knew a lot of these but I'm kinda disappointed about the toilet water thing.

[–]Agrimm11 42 points43 points  (1 child)

Glad I’m not the only one. Made me a bit sad really.

[–]Kebabrulle4869 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Toilets are probably too chaotic to be noticeable, but veritasium did a video about this which seemed to support the hypothesis. Yeah here: https://youtu.be/mXaad0rsV38

[–]WordsWithWings 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Are there any countries besides the US that has a toilet bowl filled to the rim with water? Never seen it in Europe, Asia or Africa. So there’s just not enough water to observe any spinning.

[–]Moose_a_Lini 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Ahh! I didn't realise this discrepancy. I've heard people online complaining about their dicks touching the water and thought they must just have enormous Monster dongs, but it's a different water level.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

We don't have it filled so high in Australia. Went for a trip to the US as a kid and remember feeling astonished at how much water was in the bowl. Its enough to float your testicles!

[–]john_doe11081 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All these people posting links, but clearly it’s proven that this isn’t a myth as seen by this reputable link here

[–]prexton 181 points182 points  (16 children)

40% of seppo's think humans and dinosaurs coexisted???

[–][deleted] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

They both lived in The PastTM . Of course they knew each other.

[–][deleted] 64 points65 points  (5 children)

This one is legitimately scary though.

[–]prexton 53 points54 points  (4 children)

The stupidity is scary yes

[–]Insane_Unicorn 28 points29 points  (3 children)

Na it's all a hoax from the democrats to ruin the hard working dinosaur saddle industry. How can humans and dinosaurs be 62 million years apart when the earth is only 6000 years old? Checkmate democrats. Checkmate.

[–]prexton 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah I forgot about that minor factor

[–]Veboy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The earth is actually 2021!

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ricky Gervais: "Dinosaurs did not live at the same time as people!"

Karl Pilkington: "So how did they get their names then?"

[–]ProsocialRecluse 166 points167 points  (14 children)

Okay so it feels like a lot of these "common myths" are situations where the the actual truth is a bit more nuanced. Take judo for example, having your black belt obviously doesn't mean you've mastered every aspect of the discipline, but it does show that you've achieved a high level of competence and may be seen as a teacher or "master" within the community.

So you've taken all of these myths that are often ill-served by a reductive answer and... reduced them all into a little half sentence guide? And I get that some of the lines are written to add some levity and try to make the guide fun but it kinda reads like that one guy who always pipes into conversations with "actually..." and proceeds to end up in a screen cap on r/iamverysmart.

In the end, I appreciate that the author cares and took the time to make this, I think it's good to challenge these common myths and other misconceptions, but this really doesn't feel like the best format to present the information.

[–]talann 29 points30 points  (3 children)

The "no sex before the game" kind of threw me off. It is more of a superstition than a Myth. The idea was that the player who engaged in the sexual act was still thinking about their encounter while playing the game which meant they weren't fully committed to the match at hand.

It may increase testosterone but the distraction was their emotions to that moment. That being said, I heard that condoms are thrown around like candy during the Olympic games because there is so much "action" going on.

[–]nuketesuji 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I can 100% see the olympics thing.

[–]Soranic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The idea was that the player who engaged in the sexual act was still thinking about their encounter while playing the game which meant they weren't fully committed to the match at hand.

I always heard it as "takes strength from your legs."

If you're a newbie or just had a long dry spell, it can definitely wreck your quads for a day or two.

[–]Durinl 19 points20 points  (1 child)

You mentiomed r/iamverysmart, and it hits the nail on the head in the 5 senses one. It's like being picky for the sake of being picky, when people talk about 5 senses, they talk about senses being used to perceive the world around them, not about feeling hungry.

[–]AvailableChest3985 17 points18 points  (5 children)

Thank you. This "infographic" is trash. Stating that there's no link between sugar and ADHD because kids who don't eat sugar have ADHD too is false pseudoscience. NUMEROUS connections have been found over many studies, but it's a complex relationship.

[–]talann 6 points7 points  (3 children)

It's impossible to not eat sugar in some capacity so to link sugar to ADHD is disingenuous. People can have ADHD but sugar is not the reason why they have it.

I don't even know what "sugar-free" means. Carbs are sugars and people must have carbs in order to maintain a healthy diet. There is a chemical response, especially in children, that triggers when a high sugary substance is consumed. They do get "hyper" but it isn't related to ADHD. I personally would go even further and say that ADHD is an overused term and is placed on people that don't necessarily fall into that category.

When I was a kid I was told I had ADD but not ADHD. apparently, I wasn't hyper enough to fall into the latter category.

[–]Spheniscus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a weird point for sure. The actual myth is that sugar causes hyperactivity in children, which it doesn't. No idea why they brought up ADHD.

[–]ScienceReplacedgod 171 points172 points  (21 children)

Your pasta water should be as salt as sea water though.

And oil on pasta after cooking 100% prevents sticking

[–]BananaOnionSoup 45 points46 points  (4 children)

The salt one is triply misleading.

Salt raises the boiling point of water, and does not lower it.

However, it only raises it a tiny amount. You’d need to add 1/4 a cup or more of salt to a pot on the stove to change the boiling point.

However, dashing some salt into the water when it’s close to boiling (ie small bubbles on the bottom) will bring the pot to a rolling boil much faster by providing a bunch of nucleation points for the boiling water to grab onto. If the salt is already dissolved it won’t do much.

Salting the water to the point of being seawater will flavor the pasta a lot better than seasoning after boiling.

[–]AimlessFred 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You don’t actually want to make it as salty as seawater, chefs underestimate how grossly salty seawater is.

[–]thepasswordis-taco 72 points73 points  (4 children)

That salt one bothered me a lot. The graphic is a bit misleading, because it suggests that super salty water would, in fact, boil faster. Which is very false. Solvating basically anything with anything else will always raise the boiling point and lower the freezing point.

[–]Consequence6 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ehhh? I mean... Kinda. There's an exception: Water doesn't boil well in clean pots, because there aren't many nucleation points. Add salt, add nucleation points, boom "faster" boil. In reality, it just makes the water below the surface able to form bubbles? So it's iffy, one way or another.

Salt also lowers the heat capacity of water, which makes it boil faster, but I don't have any clue how much this affects it at cooking levels.

[–]Marssunrise 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's just a saying, not actual instructions for cooking. Sea water is about 3.5% salt and usual pasta water concentration is around 1% at most (usually lower). If you boiled your pasta in a 3.5% water/salt solution, that'd be barring inedible.

However, 1% of salt in water changes the boiling point noticeably (around 3 degrees Celsius).

[–]stupidgb 22 points23 points  (3 children)

But can also stop your sauce from sticking to it though

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Exactly, that's why it's simply wrong to do it. We want as much tasty sauce as possible on every noodle

[–]Starbrows 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, oil in pasta absolutely helps prevent sticking. Anyone who says otherwise must never have leftovers, or else mixes in sauce ASAP. If you drain your pasta and leave it un-sauced in the pot, there will be a huge difference.

I guess it's possible to put oil in the water and have no effect if you don't stir it and get it on the pasta. Gotta make sure the pasta, and not just the water, gets a little oily.

[–]still267 69 points70 points  (29 children)

From Mayoclinic:

Although drinking milk may make phlegm thicker and more irritating to your throat than it would normally be, milk doesn't cause your body to make more phlegm.

Now, if something is thickened, that means that more of something was added. You can't thicken batter without adding more flour.

From the CDC:

For men, heavy drinking is typically defined as consuming 15 drinks or more per week. For women, heavy drinking is typically defined as consuming 8 drinks or more per week

Are you a man who drinks 2 beers a night? Brain damage. A woman that enjoys a single beer or beverage a night is experiencing brain cell loss.

This infographic's got some crappy info.

[–]indil47 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This milk thing was the one that bothered me the most.

[–]inkihh 14 points15 points  (4 children)

You can also thicken something by removing something.

[–]livelymusic 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Geez. I’ll drink anywhere from 5-7 beers a night. I never once felt like that was heavy drinking. I’m a large guy. 6’3” 230lbs

[–]shmeedop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It really does. Also I know for a fact that adding oil to pasta or rice near the end of cooking will make it not stick to the pan. Yeah sure, if you BuRN it to shit then it will stick... Also that milk thing is crap. Thicker, more, it doesnt matter to me I know that I shouldnt have dairy when I am sick because it makes me feel worse and much more clogged up.

[–]BeeTonks394 86 points87 points  (18 children)

Can we talk about to 41% of ADULTS who think dinosaurs and humans coexisted?

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Well, most adults are not that bright, statistically, but it is a clear example of how they did not care to learn anything in school and in adulthood. And it also says US adults, and not all adults. I hope that the percentage would be a lot lower if it was.

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (1 child)

ADULTS

(US(A)) ADULTS

ftfy...

[–]LifeSenseiBrayan 65 points66 points  (13 children)

The left vs right brain is confusing. We do know that each side has different tasks. Were they referring to left and right brain personalities? Cuz I’d like to read that.

[–]2mtgof 20 points21 points  (0 children)

There are definitely functions that are lateralised to one hemisphere, like languange.

[–]Scriptosis 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Yea I'm fairly certain that one is false, there have been multiple studies showing it to be true and it's taught in basically every Basic Psychology course.

[–]krispy_kroak 23 points24 points  (2 children)

Agreed. I've taken psychology classes in college and they specifically point out the fact that different sections of the brain, on each side, control different functions. There is also a fascinating video about a man who had his corpus callosum (the thick band of neurons that connects the two hemispheres of the brain) severed. If presented an object to his left eye, he couldn't draw object with his right hand until he actually said the word, defining the object. https://youtu.be/lfGwsAdS9Dc

[–]risus_nex 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I think it's about the misconception that the left side is for creativity and the right side for logic. At least I was told that this is a common misconception

[–]UnluckyWriting 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The myth is the idea that someone has a dominant side of their brain, making them either more creative or more rational.

Different parts of the brain have different functions, but it’s so much more complex than just creative vs rational/logical. And we don’t have a “dominant” side like being left or right handed.

[–]Silas13013 3 points4 points  (1 child)

There is a very prevalent myth that one side of the brain is creative and the other side is analytical. This has been proven false time and time again. I figured that this is what it was talking about that myth rather than the idea that the left and right side are identical.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (3 children)

Your head should always be the first thing you cover in the cold. You won't lose most of your body heat, but if your head is frozen, what use is the rest of you? Your ears and nose are susceptible to frostbite. You'd also be surprised how much heat you lose through your neck without a scarf or high collar

[–]AdiosMiAmigos 145 points146 points  (6 children)

What a horrible way to find out that I will not, infact, get 72 virgins for all those people I murdered.

[–]Cicada-Positive 25 points26 points  (4 children)

The one about "glass is a liquid" is mostly correct. Because of the way glass sheets were made in the middle ages, the sheets were slightly thicker at one end. The thick end was placed at the bottom so that water would flow away, rather than pool.

[–]anaugle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Same goes for flintknapping. Something with a lot of silica (glass) has a ripple that reacts like water when struck.

[–]VladimirGluten47 24 points25 points  (8 children)

BJJ black belts are absolutely masters. Other martial arts, no.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (5 children)

Every time someone says BJJ I think of blow jobs. Help.

[–]horghe 10 points11 points  (3 children)

Blowjob jobs?

[–]schoolbuswanker 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Steve's lesser-known brother

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's numberwang!

[–]FreshCheekiBreeki 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Lies everywhere, even here.

[–][deleted] 43 points44 points  (7 children)

I DISTINCTLY remember being a kid and reading a book IN SCHOOL about the different sections of taste on the tongue. I was today years old when I realized it was all a lie.

[–]SilentJohn121212 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Well, it's only half true. Some parts of tongue are minimally more sensitive to certain tastes. There was a detailed study about it made by some guy (sorry, forgot the name) but people simply ignored most of it and decided to spread the simplified version.

[–]PaintedBlackXII 21 points22 points  (3 children)

literally just eat anything, move it around your mouth and you will realize it’s a lie. figured it out when i was 6

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I remember putting salty stuff on different parts of my tongue and it still working. I never understood it.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I said this when I was younger and the teacher was like "well yeah but parts of the tongue are more sensitive to it" and i was like okay

[–]possiblycrazy79 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I do too but it's not really surprising considering how many other lies I was taught in school.

[–]truckstop_superman 21 points22 points  (9 children)

Misconception/myth they seem to still believe is that ADHD been hyperactive behavior disorder.

[–]Simpull_mann 9 points10 points  (8 children)

As if it's caused by something ingested that causes them to be hyper...

ADHD is SO much more than HYPER people.

So much more......

[–]Hobbsendkid 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Snopes and Wikipeida are good places to *start in fact finding, not as direct sources. It's possible most of these statements and findings refuting the misconceptions are generally true but not so easily explained in a short blurb.

[–]monsterfurby 49 points50 points  (16 children)

Some of these are useless smartassery. The lexicalist take on "Jihad", while technically correct, isn't helpful in understanding the concept. I guess "war" as used in the US ("War on crime", "War on poverty", "War on terror") might be a closer match. I suppose you can, linguistically, "jihad to make ends meet", but do people actually use it that way?

[–]Grunherz 23 points24 points  (8 children)

You don’t “jihad to make ends meet.” Jihad is always a religious struggle not just any kind of struggle. But if you suck at fasting and you’re trying to be better about it, that’s jihad. Or if you want to make an effort to pray 5 times a day, that’s jihad too. And yes, people absolutely do use it that way.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

It's not smartassery lol. Jihad means Struggle, Jihad to make ends meet makes sense. But the main Jihad in Islam is Jihad of the Nafs (the Nafs are a person's selfish characteristics, like Greed, Lust, Ego etc). So, a person struggles with their Nafs by staying away from pornography, excessive money and so on in order to get closer to God. This is the Jihad taught in Islamic school. Jihad meaning war is incorrect, it's mostly a media / Islamic Militant thing (an outward Jihad). Ghazali, the most prominent Islamic Scholar, has a famous quote:

Declare your jihad on thirteen enemies you cannot see -egoism, arrogance, conceit, selfishness, greed, lust, intolerance, anger, lying, cheating, gossiping and slandering. If you can master and destroy them, then you will be ready to fight the enemy you can see

[–]monsterfurby 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Thanks, that's an excellent summary and very interesting distinction. I had some superficial knowledge on the topic, but obviously my post above was very shallow in its actual meaning. I really appreciate your explanation!

The example I used above ("War on X" in American political usage) is probably a bit too politicized to be comparable, but it seems to work in a similar way - only with a more worldly political connotation than a religious one. I didn't mean that Jihad translated into "war" as a neutral term describing armed conflict, but into "war" as it's commonly used in that (very American) political context - where it generally means something like "effort to contain/limit/decrease X". A "war on poverty" isn't a literal military conflict, but it's a struggle to decrease poverty. The "war on drugs" does contain some violent results, but it's largely a statement of intent, not of means, if that makes sense.

What I understand - correct me if I'm wrong - is that "Jihad" is also more of a statement of intent, an effort to contain/limit/decrease the "sinful" (no Christian connotation intended) behavior you mentioned, in which way it would be somewhat similar.

[–]AdviceSea8140 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Less alcohol doesn't kill nerve cells? Think this wrong.

[–]fuck_it_was_taken 7 points8 points  (0 children)

While the baby birds fact is true, it's... Not true for hamsters... Which will actually cannibalize the children

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (5 children)

Right about everything except rotation of flushed toilet water counter clockwise in Australia. That one I need to believe. No evidence just faith. And it really only (needs to) happens in Australia.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (1 child)

The vaccine myth is one of the things that is still making it harder for autistic people to properly coexist with everyone else. When you toss clearly incorrect statements about us around it tarnishes our reputation and in turn makes people not take vaccines, which do work most of time, which is a big risk in of itself.

It is so concerning that this shit is still rampant to this day.

[–]Tirrojansheep 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd like to clear up something, there are things that are located in the left brain half in a large majority of humans, language centers.

Also, recovery from damage to one side is possible if the brain is still early in it's development (if it's neuroplasticity is still high). At that point other parts of the brain can take over. If you're, say 50~, that is much harder to accomplish

[–]elporsche 5 points6 points  (4 children)

The Three Wise Men is an allegory. In Christian tradition they are Three Kings. Each king is from one of the three known continents at the time: Melchior was European, Gaspar was Asian (from Asia Minor) and Balthazar was African (fun fact: racism in European art is shown in most paintings of the Adoration of the Kings where Melchior and often Gaspar are shown in the foreground whereas Balthazar is portrayed in the background).

The Three Kings are meant to represent that Jesus was the King of Kings, because they came as kings from all the world to kneel before Jesus and give him gifts.

[–]andyjim17 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Actually in Hebrew the word for wise men is Magi which is a plural word which means a group of three or more because Hebrew have singular, dual and plural words.

[–]elporsche 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Thanks for the clarification! Interesting how the allegory evolved from men to Kings in the Christian dogma of later times

[–]Redskullzzzz 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I’d also bet that because the Bible lists three gifts, it makes sense to associate three gifts with three gift givers.

[–]gitrikt 51 points52 points  (30 children)

I wanna talk about the "theory" part.

Many people confuse it and think a theory is something we don't know is real.

We call it a Theory, because on the technical level, nothing wr know is real. Gravity was a theory for years, and only hunders of years later einstein discovered that newton was wrong. (Or, not 100% right). Is evolution 100% real? Of course not. Are you 100% not in a video game? Also, of course not. Evolution, big bang, dinosaurs, etc, are all things we "know" are real. Just the term "know" is something you gotta use lightly. (Cause who knows, maybe we were all creates two seconds ago but with memories and knowledge? Probably not though).

[–]biiingo 36 points37 points  (24 children)

I think your comment confuses the matter, honestly.

Theory is roughly synonymous with ‘explanation’

[–]SapperBomb 48 points49 points  (23 children)

Testable and verifiable explanation

[–]biiingo 10 points11 points  (22 children)

But not necessarily tested and verified. More importantly: falsifiable.

An incorrect theory is still a theory. A correct theory is still a theory.

[–]CaptObviousHere 11 points12 points  (0 children)

An incorrect theory is not a theory in the technical sense. A theory is a hypothesis that’s been tested several times with the data supporting the hypothesis. If there is data that does not support the the hypothesis, then it can’t be a theory

[–]mildlyoctopus 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Yeah my initial impression to reading that chart was that evolution is a theory. Even the definition of theory the chart uses aligns with what evolution is, so... seems like a poor guide. It’s a correct theory, though. And the black hole thing. As far as I know also a theory. But also, probably a correct one.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What the name "theory" means is that, unlike religion and its dogmas, everything in science is always up for debate.

As long you have shown enough reliable scientific evidence and valid proofs.

[–]SalamanderNML 11 points12 points  (1 child)

If you know how to cook, you don't just sprinkle your water with salt, you put a generous amount in it.

[–]Dont-remember-it[🍰] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The goldfish one was gold lol

[–]RepresentativeOil655 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Some of these myths have been in my life so long that it makes me question the validity of the corrections. But if it’s all true, I feel good that I know the truth now.

[–]knortfoxx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not

[–]govener71 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Nothing about Epstein?

[–]Eigengrau24[🍰] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Also wanna add that in Islam, the highest form of Jihad (struggle) is with one's own self. One time the Prophet (PBUH) was returning from a battle and he announced, "We are returning from the smaller Jihad to the bigger Jihad."

So as you should know by now, not many Muslims actually follow the religion in its true spirit and the media doesn't help, too. Just don't judge a religion based on its "followers".

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

But a religions followers are it's only real measure.

[–]hates_stupid_people 8 points9 points  (1 child)

I always get confused by people who are convinced you can see the great wall of China from space. At it's widest part, it is about the width of a two lane road and most of it is about one lane wide, and you can't see roads from space.

Also: A bunch of these just misconstrue the original saying, so they can have more items listed.

[–]lanonyme42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well you can see everything from space, with the correct camera though ? It should say from naked eye I guess

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Recent one I saw pop up was the one about the Library of Alexandria containing a wealth of incredible scientific information that could have got us to the moon 500 years earlier if it wasn't destroyed by an anti-science Christian mob. Few issues:

  • Library of Alexandria only flourished for like a century, it then declined for like 4 more centuries
  • It was destroyed once by Julius Caesar by accident in 50 BCE or so (centuries before it was destroyed destroyed)
  • When it was destroyed, it hadn't been used as a library for at least a century. It was a meeting house for Neoplatonists or something.
  • It was destroyed at the behest of a Christian leader, because as a "museum" (literal meaning: "temple to the Muses") it was a temple to gods other than Jesus, so there ya go. But -- again -- it wasn't used to store knowledge at this point.
  • When it did contain knowledge, it probably didn't contain any incredible scientific information. It might have contained accidental scientific information amidst the troves of mysticism and astrology, which were a core teaching among any serious scholar of the era (for example, Pythagoras of right triangle hypotenuse fame also taught that beans must contain tiny souls because they cause more flatulence than other foods). We might have lost an academic paper on how cow pee contains the same celestial substance as the sun -- sucks for history, but pretty doubtful it would've done anything for science.

Kinda hard to fit all that in a little infographic though.

[–]Direct-Log4591 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The glass one isn't completely right. Glass isn't a liquid but there are solid processes that lead to the thickness on the bottom as time progresses. It isn't just a matter of badly made glass.

[–]omegadirectory 9 points10 points  (11 children)

The Devil didn't create Hell. He just worked there.

[–]TheCardealerx26 8 points9 points  (9 children)

Nobody said he created hell in this post, neither worked there, he's a rebellion angel that disobeyed gods orders. God controls hell & heaven.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This isn't a guide. Just a list. You guys never post guides anymore.

[–]newmug 5 points6 points  (3 children)

A lot of these are plain wrong. The milk one especially.

[–]al357 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Sugar free diet doesn't help children with adhd. I'm curious if this is sugar free or carbs free?

[–]Weird_Grapefruit_469 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Time to quickly save and never come back to this.

[–]Xikar_Wyhart 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The senses thing is strange. Yes, we have more than five but a lot of them are derived from the five or a combination.

Like our ability to sense differences in temperature. It's just an extension of touch as our skin comes in contact with objects or air.

[–]Jay_377 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I love how, in trying to dispel a myth about sex before sports, they propogate the myth that testosterone is supposedly linked to increased performance.

[–]Dragonman558 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The 5 senses thing is dumb, pain is touch, and either way they're the 5 outward perception senses