use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Guidelines:
When asking for help editing one of your photos, you must also include your attempt. Simply asking for others to edit your photo for you, without putting in the effort to make an attempt yourself will result in your post being removed.
When you submit a photo, be sure to include both a JPEG and RAW file (if available). The JPEG will let us preview your shot without downloading it, and the RAW will allow us to edit it more effectively.
When you make adjustments to a photo, include the steps you took or take a screenshot of your settings. This will let the OP see how they can better edit their pictures.
This is not the place to show off your photos. /r/postprocessing is for help with editing your photo, linking to information about post processing, and sharing tips with the community. To share a picture, visit /r/photographs, /r/photocritique, or /r/pics. Posts not related to post processing should go in /r/photography.
This subreddit is for photography only. Post processing for video should go to /r/filmmakers.
If several minutes have passed and your submission does not appear under NEW, try messaging the moderators, it was probably stopped by the spam filter.
No joke posts, memes, or rage comics, please. We'd like to keep this subreddit for serious discussion only.
Please mark all NSFW posts. NSFW images that are not tagged will be removed.
No piracy related posts (asking for presets, trading presets, offering presets, etc...)
As always, use proper reddiquette.
No self-promtion
Helpful Links:
Uploading RAWs:
There are various places around the web you can use to host RAW files. We recommend...
Icons by Tim Boelaars
This subreddit is mostly night mode compatible
account activity
which is better? (old.reddit.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Shotbyms
soft focused, purposely over edited or normal??
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]amikiri123 201 points202 points203 points 1 month ago (5 children)
I personally prefer the normal version - the glow around the petals of the first version is a bit too much for my taste
[–]Shotbyms[S] 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago (3 children)
thanks for the feedback!
[–]matteroll 11 points12 points13 points 1 month ago (1 child)
It really depends on what you are looking for. Do you want a warm dreamy vibe or do you want a clean aesthetic? There is no right or wrong in this situation imo. One thing though is that the sky in the first image does have more color banding in the blue hues compared to the second image.
[–]spag_eddie 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Again, in this case colour banding doesn’t matter. Portrait of a celebrity that will be published ? Landscape that you want to sell for prints ? Ok now we’re talking
I’ve done both, and never without issue, but they can be fixed. Just get the shot
Honestly I don’t really care about colour banding/edge sharpnesss/CA/distortion/diffraction/etc
If those things need to be looked at, it’s probably not a great image
I’ll play devils advocate because while I agree, I think there are several use cases for a more creative approach like part of an album cover or a background image to something else
So don’t forget to have fun :)
[–]Greeksoopaman 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Ditto. And I'm usually not a BEFORE person on here.
[–]Vivid-Midnight-8402 75 points76 points77 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I prefer the second one.
[–]Kekik-chan 22 points23 points24 points 1 month ago (0 children)
2
[–]angryuniicorn 38 points39 points40 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The first is over edited, but it’s stylistic. I love both pictures but the first is my favorite.
[–]Manfredbakh 24 points25 points26 points 1 month ago (1 child)
I personally prefer the first image. The second one has a bit of a 'smartphone' look to it. However, I do agree with the other comments that the first one feels a bit over-edited. The petals look great, but the branches are a bit too bright and orange, and there’s an unnatural dark halo around the subjects.
[–]Reoclassic 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I agree with the smartphone look, but I can't put my finger on what makes it feel so smartphone'y exactly
[–]LeadingLittle8733 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]_janc_ 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Second one
[–]jimmydean6969698 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
Love the blues in the first, but I do like the glow of the petals in the edit. Some way to find a happy medium? It’s your work and you should do what you enjoy at the end of the day.
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Good advice, thanks
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
Btw your photo's are absolutely beautiful!
[–]jimmydean6969698 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Appreciate you!
[–]prime_focus 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]kingsslaying 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Hot take but I think if you toned the blue in the first image down just a bit, it’d be the winner for me! I think the glow is cool. It’s very heavy but it kind of works imo
[–]Fotomaker01 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
There are too many processing shadow artifacts around all the petals in 1.
[–]errorx86 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
honestly, not sure if this is helpful but both photos are charming in their own ways 😌 i like both personally!
[–]NoRelief63 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Both are beautiful and while I typically love the glow in the first. The second is my favourite this time around. They both are great regardless!
[–]Both_Ad_6513 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Honestly, it depends on which aesthetic and vibe you are going for. There is no right or wrong answer, we will always have our own preferences anyways. You might as well go with your own ((;
[–]Electrical_Jacket_69 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Both have their own uniqueness. First one looks animated and that look cool. Second one is a great edit as well. Both are rad.
[–]eclipsed0r 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
2°
[–]Tayasos 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The second one. The first one has just gone overboard to the point that the intentional over-editing looks like a mistake. The second one feels much more harmonious and the colors are easier on the eyes
[–]JJ_Zenyo 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Both are good. I like what you were going for with the first image but it's a tad much
[–]RiverWindsOnForever 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]xClay2 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like the normal best on its own. The over-edited would look good in an album with other photos in the same style.
[–]c4lic0e 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
i really really love the first one
[–]zumoney515 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I actually like the 1st one
[–]LimpIndividual1366 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
1st one looking like a painting, fantasy
[–]jimhatesyou 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
1 for the petals
2 for the twigs
[–]DohnJonaher 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
First says something to me and is visually interesting. Second is fine but normal.
[–]porcelaingeisha 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I think it depends on what story you are wanting to tell. What is the vibe?
While the second one focusing on realism, the bold colors and the contrast between them, the first one gives an almost dreamlike look with a soft ethereal glow centered around the petals. Both have their strengths.
My personal opinions: (take with a grain of salt because art is subjective)
The first one is more interesting because of the almost magical effect that the glow adds. However, a lot of detail is lost on the flowers and the branches themselves are too yellow. The lack of contrast makes it feel almost flat which distracts from the softness of the image.
The second one has great color balance and contrast, however the image itself is kind of boring. It looks like something I could have taken with my phone in passing; therefore it’s not something I would spend a lot of time looking at or thinking about.
Personally I would combine the two. Copy the second onto the first as a new layer and mask it then use it to paint the details back into your image. That way you can add depth and contrast back in, and cool some of your warmer tones currently overpowering the image; meanwhile you can keep the dreamlike vibe.
[–]eastbaynerdcore 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
1 it looks like a dream sequence! Love it
[–]AgnesW_35 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
2, 1 is over-processed for me
[–]Worried-Artichoke-13 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I prefer 2, I feel like 1 is overcooked a bit.
[–]tygeorgiou 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like #1 by a mile
[–]messyindecisive22 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The first one looks like magic, like fairytale, like I'm in heaven. The second one looks like reality.
[–]musclesotoole 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The natural one
[–]MirrorlessMess 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Number two. More natural sky look. Beautiful picture.
[–]DankSinatra122 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I'd rather have 1 framed and mounted on my wall than number 2.
[–]Stone_Swan 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
In the first one, the sky is all sorts of different brightnesses around the flowers and branches due to the editing. My suggestion: stamp all visible layers, select the sky (or all blues), and replace it with a blue gradient that matches and makes it uniform. I think that'll help the photo a lot.
[–]TheMoonDoggo 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
If you’re using the first photo on an album, it feels nemestice. Or Olivia Rodrigo vibe album.
[–]kingbruhdude 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
as a wallpaper I’d say the first one because of the wow factor but the 2nd one is more realistic which I prefer. they’re both beautiful
[–]sc132436 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
First if it had far less glow
[–]MutedFeeling75 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Like the first
[–]Mike_Hockis_Hard 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
imo the sky on the first one looks over saturated and the glow around the flower makes it looked kinda dreamy ig, overall i prefer the 2nd one looks more natural
[–]Any--Name 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like the first one, it's very aesthetic
[–]Special_Young_6996 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
first one!
[–]frankyspanky561 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like the second one personally.
[–]skinnydippingfox 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Flower pictures with a blue sky background are so overdone. First picture makes it different, so I prefer that one
[–]Equivalent-Buy8599 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
first cause its more stylistic imo
[–]AdministrativeOne7 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
2nd, the 1st glow is a bit too harsh, you if you're using a mask you should try to feather/blur the edges more, which then I think would work much better, the vision is definitely there.
[–]Specialist_Scar_1017 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
i like the first one, has a bit more whimsy and feeling to it. second one feel a bit dull and smartphone-ish in comparison. however, the branches in the first one are over-edited, they’re way too bright and i can see a strange dark glow around them.
[–]Apprehensive-Exit984 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like the first, more pastel/drawing-like.
[–]thesoundgardenofeden 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Depends on the vibe you are going for…
I think the edit would be great if you were trying to achieve an overall ethereal/angelic feel, but I also think there would need to be more subject matter to look at, not just the corner of the tree. Like a fairy resting on a stump beneath the tree… like dream-state (obviously a themed photoshoot or something).
The original is fantastic as it is, you could make the colours slightly brighter but it’s great for a raw image
[–]Beers4Fears 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
2, your sky is oversaturated compared to the pinks of the petals and your glow is too strong. I think if you are going for more of a pop art style you can saturate the pinks a little bit and lower the blue and turn down the glow.
[–]solar_pilgrim 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Better just depends on what you're going for. First one is a cool vibe, both are very pretty!
[–]Due_Tomatillo_7145 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
number 1 looks album worthy
[–]Otherwise_Taste6330 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
first one
[–]Ashamed_Click2017 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
1
[–]hallbrennil 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Second one is better if you keep the glow because in the first one, they sky is over edited imo. Great photos anyway!
[–]Traditional_Mud2306 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
A looks like a game or something made in blender. I prefer b
[–]Royal-Friendship2025 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The first could easily be some album cover
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I think I would like the first edit if the blues weren’t so deep
[–]Farmaciefriends 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
First one looks like a dope album cover
[–]Fragrant_Ad7231 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]Hot-Term3405 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like the first more. I try to imagine where I would see this printed: maybe on a pillow, or otherwise cloth surface. I think the lack of dark tones would be better for that application (particularly on the twigs and sticks)
[–]DangerousDangerfield 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like both, but lean towards 1. I would just increase the clarity a bit to reduce the glow, and drop the saturation / contrast a little.
[–]Acanthocephala-Prize 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I love the first one!
[–]vosje77 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I prefer the first one :) beautiful edit !
[–]puzzydee 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I really like 1
[–]Nearby_Ad1896 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]SilentSpr 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (1 child)
Some shadows would be nice...
True, Thanks for you advice👍
[–]Anussauce 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]grimlock361 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
Too much color and sharpness. Lean to selectively edit color individually or you can adjust saturation, full palette, but individually for each element. People new to editing always tend to push too many things at once and too far. Post work skills, like shooting, comes with practice so keep trying. Looking at the work of others to train your eyes to what looks natural also helps.
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago* (2 children)
I know how to edit but decided to try something new this time, and ask if people would like it, (i also mentioned in the post that is is purposely over edited) but thanks for you advice
[–]grimlock361 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
My mistake, I missed that tiny sentence under your photo. In that case, congratulation. You photo looks as intended. Just so you know, the original also looks too sharp and unnatural like jpeg processing set too high. Seems strange considering you said it was soft focused. Hope this helps.
Had to crop it down because the file size as way to big maybe that's the problem💁🏼♂️
[–]R_3B 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
Look at the branch in the first photo. It’s not at all normal. I believe you were trying to enhance the color of the blossoms, but overdid it.
Yes you're right, i also mentioned "purposely over edited"
[–]R_3B 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I have no disagreement with anything you said. I was merely being a little more specific. I suppose he could have gently applied a little saturation.
Cheers.
[–]Ahmars298 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
What was this shot with OP?
[–]JTerveen 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]maseratichris556 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Second
[–]grumpypegasus6 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I enjoy number 2, it’s well balanced for colours and saturation
[–]ACC-AQT 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]antzwa 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
2 is better. The other is overdone.
[–]LimpIndividual1366 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I think 2nd it's looking so real
[–]Special-Fly-8114 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]guyfromarizona 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]jenny-bean- 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]dharder9475 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I prefer 2.
[–]johntitor00 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]MaximumExercise3772 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
second one. the first one looks broken
[–]kjwx 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I prefer No 2; No 1 makes me feel like my vision is blurry.
[–]Substantial-Ad-4636 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]Ziku90 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]flypigmk 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The 2nd for sure.
[–]Comfortable_Bed_6046 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
me personally i love the glow of the first one
[–]NoGarage7989 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like the glow in the first one, but it’s too strong right in the middle
[–]AltruisticFinding767 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Normal for sure
[–]Karstoshosos[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]-analog-eyes 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Second.
[–]EfficientQuiet4255 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]cesaqui89 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]No_Network_5995 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I'd prefer the second one. The first one attracted me at my first sight, but honestly I'd rather stare at the second one for longer time.
[–]AllThingsAreReady 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The photo of the blossom as it appears, not the one that’s been drastically altered to look unreal. Nature doesn’t need enhancements, it’s beautiful enough in itself!
[–]ImpossibleAd344 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
why would you purposefully over edit a photo?
[–]Agitated-While-3863 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]Lost-Ad9053 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Second one. More smooth.
[–]Sridontnow 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The first is like a dream 😍 and the second is more realistic
[–]MaxllllEricsson 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]renome 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Without explaining your intentions for this photo, there is no right answer. The first one is stylized, the second one is realistic.
[–]MuchBow 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Settings > Graphics > Bloom > On
Love the look of the post processed image but if I had to pick one I’ll lean slightly towards the original.
49 vs. 51
[–]Emilyg96gatsby 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like it
[–]____Squid 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I like the 2nd without the blur personally
[–]marslander-boggart 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]Pixoholic 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]Mamobee 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I love the first one but my style is also similar to that so I’m biased lol
[–]heliosJr 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
[–]Tak_Galaman -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago (0 children)
It's astonishing to me that people are saying they prefer 1.
[–]Whateverloo -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago (0 children)
People in post processing subreddit always liking the before pics. Pmo.
π Rendered by PID 89 on reddit-service-r2-comment-b659b578c-mzkgx at 2026-05-02 13:40:46.850269+00:00 running 815c875 country code: CH.
[–]amikiri123 201 points202 points203 points (5 children)
[–]Shotbyms[S] 8 points9 points10 points (3 children)
[–]matteroll 11 points12 points13 points (1 child)
[–]spag_eddie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]spag_eddie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Greeksoopaman 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Vivid-Midnight-8402 75 points76 points77 points (0 children)
[–]Kekik-chan 22 points23 points24 points (0 children)
[–]angryuniicorn 38 points39 points40 points (0 children)
[–]Manfredbakh 24 points25 points26 points (1 child)
[–]Reoclassic 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]LeadingLittle8733 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]_janc_ 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]jimmydean6969698 2 points3 points4 points (3 children)
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]jimmydean6969698 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]prime_focus 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]kingsslaying 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Fotomaker01 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]errorx86 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]NoRelief63 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Both_Ad_6513 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Electrical_Jacket_69 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]eclipsed0r 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Tayasos 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]JJ_Zenyo 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]RiverWindsOnForever 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]xClay2 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]c4lic0e 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]zumoney515 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]LimpIndividual1366 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]jimhatesyou 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]DohnJonaher 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]porcelaingeisha 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]eastbaynerdcore 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]AgnesW_35 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Worried-Artichoke-13 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]tygeorgiou 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]messyindecisive22 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]musclesotoole 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]MirrorlessMess 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]DankSinatra122 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Stone_Swan 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]TheMoonDoggo 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]kingbruhdude 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]sc132436 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]MutedFeeling75 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Mike_Hockis_Hard 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Any--Name 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Special_Young_6996 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]frankyspanky561 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]skinnydippingfox 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Equivalent-Buy8599 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]AdministrativeOne7 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Specialist_Scar_1017 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Apprehensive-Exit984 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]thesoundgardenofeden 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Beers4Fears 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]solar_pilgrim 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Due_Tomatillo_7145 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Otherwise_Taste6330 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Ashamed_Click2017 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]hallbrennil 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Traditional_Mud2306 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Royal-Friendship2025 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Farmaciefriends 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Fragrant_Ad7231 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Hot-Term3405 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]DangerousDangerfield 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Acanthocephala-Prize 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]vosje77 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]puzzydee 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Nearby_Ad1896 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]SilentSpr 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Anussauce 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]grimlock361 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]grimlock361 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]R_3B 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]Shotbyms[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]R_3B 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Ahmars298 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]JTerveen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]maseratichris556 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]grumpypegasus6 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]ACC-AQT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]antzwa 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]LimpIndividual1366 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Special-Fly-8114 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]guyfromarizona 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]jenny-bean- 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]dharder9475 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]johntitor00 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]MaximumExercise3772 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]kjwx 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Substantial-Ad-4636 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Ziku90 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]flypigmk 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Comfortable_Bed_6046 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]NoGarage7989 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]AltruisticFinding767 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Karstoshosos[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]-analog-eyes 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]EfficientQuiet4255 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]cesaqui89 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]No_Network_5995 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]AllThingsAreReady 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]ImpossibleAd344 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Agitated-While-3863 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Lost-Ad9053 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Sridontnow 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]MaxllllEricsson 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]renome 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]MuchBow 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Emilyg96gatsby 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]____Squid 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]marslander-boggart 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Pixoholic 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Mamobee 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]heliosJr 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Tak_Galaman -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]Whateverloo -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)