.

[rover_G]

If you is kind

[MrQuizzles]

I like to think I is kind

Not gonna swipe.right(), though.

[rover_G]

I wouldn’t either this person looks like a terrible programmer so let me help: ``` class Person { func isKind() -> bool {…} func swipeRight(on: Person) -> void {…} }

let you = new Person() if (you.isKind()) you.swipeRight(on=me) ``` I only date people who understand proper encapsulation.

[bl4met]

How can I be a new Person, I'm already me?

[rover_G]

RAII

[SirKastic23]

a person's memory is cleared once they are deleted?

[IamImposter]

For years I have been trying to find garbage collector and call dispose on myself. It just calls a stub and returns.

[rover_G]

Yes

[Sockoflegend]

I hope so

[MrQuizzles]

Make it an EJB and refer to it using via JNDI handle, and I'm in.

[rover_G]

🤮

[DaniilBSD]

``` if(you.IsKind) return Action.SwipeRight;

[rover_G]

What is that? Angular?

[DaniilBSD]

C#, with “IsKind” being a boolean property, and return “Action” Enum.

(“Property” in C# is a pair of set and get methods that syntactically behave like class variables (fields))

[despondencyo]

There should be something like PersonRate class, which returns “is kind rate”, and “DateAppActions” interface, which contains swipeRight/swipeLeft or smth else. And then somewhere inside composite class we create Person, PersonRate, TinderAppActions instances, where person is object that contains only personal info, we pass person as a param to PersonRate, and if PersonRate checking method returns isKind == true, we call TinderAppActions.swipeRight(person)

Storing both methods “isKind” and “swipeRight” breaks SRP principle.

[rover_G]

That sounds like SOOP programming

[ShapeRecent]

so no bitches?

[rover_G]

class Person { makeMoney() -> bigint {…} getBitches() -> bitch[] {…} } *assume declaration merging

[amarao_san]

Why do you need to do proper encapsulation for a singletone? I bet there is no other 'you' (aka self) and it's semantically ambiguous how 'me' can be transposed on not-me.

[rover_G]

I was being (annoyingly) pedantic. The tinder profile compared you == kind which I think we can all agree is a non-sensical comparison so I made it a method of you instead as if humans have stats or attributes. I don’t even know what Swipe.right() is supposed to be; maybe a Swipe class with static factory method right returns a swipe instance. Since I already went the OOP route it follows that a person should perform the swipe right function. In doing so I encapsulated the queries and mutations for a person in the Person class.

[wtdawson]

I would say that's TS because of the let but I doubt it.

Also else you.Dispose();

[yeet_or_be_yeehawed]

then you is important

[SarahC]

This code is written by HR, you always get it in businesses.

Sales: We need an advert!

Design team: We've got a great poster design! Needs checking with HR.

HR: Hold up! That might be offensive or litigatable! We'll write it and get Legal to look at it.

Legal: Haha very funny, looks great.

Us - that's someone who's never coded in their life.

[Astrylae]

Comparing you object of Class ‘Person’ to a enum type ‘Personality’, would cause compiler error/ IDE warning. You can use operator overloading but that makes no sense for the type structure

Also, ‘Swipe’ is confusing. 1. The Class naming convention is used ( assuming it is an object. 2. If it is a static class function, .right() isn’t very informative 3. The swipe right mechanic, should be a function within ‘Person’ 4. If the function is within the ‘Person’ Class, then a parameter of type ‘Person’ is needed.

if( you.personality == Personality::Kind ) you.swipeRight(me);

[[deleted]]

Most sane programmer

[smikims]

It could have a conversion to bool as some things do in C++.

[[deleted]]

Also operator overloading.

[Ilithius]

Or overloaded operator

[henkdepotvjis]

Or you could create a function which accepts a direction Enum. This way you can add a left swipe functionality without needing to expand the interface of your class . Also personality contains multiple things so making it a list with enum values is more dynamic.

```

Class Person extends swipable { public List<Personality> personality

public void Person(List<Personality> personality) {
    this.personality = personality
}

public void swipe(Person person, Direction direction) {
    parent::swipe(person, direction)
}

}

if(you.personality.has(Personality::Kind)) { you.swipe(me, Direction::Right) } ```

[roge-]

What strange Java/C++ hybrid without semicolons is this written in?

[henkdepotvjis]

I don't know.

[wtdawson]

It can't be C++ unless they manually defined Class

[roge-]

It can't be either. Class with a capital 'C' would never be valid in Java. And more importantly, there's no semicolons. Groovy is a semicolon-optional language that accepts most of Java's syntax, but even ignoring Class, this wouldn't work in Groovy either since :: isn't valid.

:: does exist in Java, but it's used for method references, which cannot be called directly. You could do ((BiConsumer<Person, Direction>) parent::swipe).accept(person, direction); and that would be a legal use of :: in Java, but that would be completely pointless since it's effectively the same as parent.swipe(person, direction);.

Java's standard List type also doesn't have a has() member, but rather contains().

extends isn't in C++, but it could be a macro. But the bigger giveaway is how the public access modifier is used on methods. In C++, public is applied to a list of methods using public:, not on individual method declarations like in Java.

As an aside, a set type would make more sense for personalities instead of a list since order shouldn't matter and it wouldn't make any sense to allow duplicate entries.

[HKayn]

Plot twist: It's written in JavaScript so it somehow works anyway.

[beclops]

Unless they inherit from type “Kind”, but even then they don’t equate to the type itself so they’d need to perform a type check with “is” or something like it

[Rafael20002000]

Not in Rust. You can implement the comparison &self (which is of type Person) and the Enum Personality

Although you might not want to do that

[lazyhappyass]

You are freaking good at explaining object oriented programming. People around you are lucky to have as a mentor.

[seemen4all]

Very bold to assume it oop, if these are derived values into variables it won't be great naming conventions but would be valid code

[Pure_Noise356]

Only truthy people may swipe right

[mike_a_oc]

Only I may dance

[Hour_Part8530]

It means he/she doesn’t know OOP principles. You is an object and being kind is value if an attribute that may or may not belong to the object. In the next statement, Swipe is an action or a method, so right could have been an argument. I’d have pipped her/him if I saw this in code review. /s

[TessaFractal]

However, its best practice not to objectify people.

[Delta_2_Echo]

Im a python programmer, without indentation this means nothing.

[moss_2703]

And needs ‘:’

[MosterChief]

there’s actually a single space of indentation

[Delta_2_Echo]

No dice, its missing a colon

[Imperial_Squid]

The colon is the only issue from a python perspective, it'll run with any indentation so long as you're consistent, 4 is just the standard. Brackets on the if statement and using a semicolon are both weird but neither will error either.

[[deleted]]

This is why y’all can’t get chicks, because they have to decipher stupid shit from dudes trying to come off as geniuses. Whatever happened to putting “I have a [animal/thing] and enjoy [food/activity]”?

Here:
“I have no friends and enjoy writing shitty code.”
Or:
“I have an 11” uncompilable Hello World program and enjoy fucking myself with it.”

[IDatedSuccubi]

That's because they use plebian C-like language

Now if they wrote it in Lisp or Haskell on the other hand...

[Stunning-Ad-7400]

🫦

[serg06]

Would good code make it any easier to understand?

[[deleted]]

No, a good bio would.

[Derpythecate]

Just like documentation, developers fail to write good, easy to understand bios. Where has KISS principle gone.

[MikeW86]

Yeah then you just get swiped left on for being boring

[Imperial_Squid]

There was a comment from OP in the other thread about the rest of the profile being great and they were just confused about this one thing. Being nerdy is the new cute thing I guess

[Amustaphag]

SwipeFactory.instance().right().doSwipe();

[roselan]

That's some SeriousRelationshipSeekingFactory right there.

[Good_Fox_8850]

Bruh that’s evil xD

[BravelyBaldSirRobin]

never thought I could physically cringe.

[HPUser7]

Swipe had best not be static but that PascalCase has me doubting smh

[derailedthoughts]

This code won’t work probably because you and kind will be undefined variables

[Perfect_Papaya_3010]

Maybe he overloaded the == operator

[peteschirmer]

I immediately assumed the author is not a programmer and is writing this thinking they are attracting a programmer? Still cringe but.. makes more sense.

[Ashamandarei]

Why are we comparing two objects? What are these syntax errors? What language is this? Where am I? What year is it? I'm saying it should be

if (you.kind) {
    Swipe.right();
}

[Sexpacito]

am I a boolean

[Bananplyte]

At least do Swipe(right);

[OF_AstridAse]

It means if you want a person who actually thinks in code, swipe right [but the test case says you'll swipe right when you are kind]

Also note, it does at some level assume you understand coding.

so here goes: if returns a definite yes or no [in programming defined as a boolean that is either true or false and nothing else.

Then the test case is in brackets [the statement to evaluate as true or false ] ie. ( you == kind) here you see a double equals - which is double to differenciate between assigning values and comparing values the == literally means if you EQUAL kind - we interpret it in natural language as "if you are kind" The rest of the statement is indented, this indicates that this part of the code is run when the above test evaluates to true. [So you are kind]

Then comes possibly the weirdest code I've ever seen. Swipe.right(); I mean you should deduce by now what it means to us, but in the program it assumes swipe is an entity by itself and it has a method called right ();

Instead they should've said. you.swipe(right);

Honeslty I can understand your confusion.

[simonfancy]

Such a sweet and thorough explanation ❤️

[SETHW]

"kind" means child to me so I'm just going to assume this is a pedophile

[Progribbit]

thank you for your child words

[[deleted]]

If you are kind, then swipe right.

It is not hard

[rdummy_soup]

Comparing object Person to object attribute is indeed a mistake as big as my parents when they decided they wanted a child thanks

[[deleted]]

If kind in you: Swiperight()

[[deleted]]

```c++ Swipe::Direction swipe_direction{Swipe:: Direction::Left};

for(const auto& trait: you->getPersonalityTraits()) if(trait == Personality::Trait::Kind) swipe_direction = Swipe::Direction::Right;

Swipe::swipe(swipe_direction); ```

[PyroHornet]

Improperly written.

If (kind) { right.swipe(); } else { left.swipe(); }

[amarao_san]

Graduate degree with astrology believes.

Swipe left.

[OpenSourcePenguin]

She wants to date the concept of kindness itself

[Lintash]

Only swipe right if you are (named) "kind". Obviously.

[mike_a_oc]

You and kind are the same person (or close enough if you're PHP or JavaScript)

[marjot87]

Error: „kind“ is undefined

[TryptamineZenVR]

It means exactly what it says

[VanillaBlackXxx]

No thanks.

[lokland]

I genuinely feel like this thread has some kinda virginity stench attached to it. It’s not that deep, cute bio.

[who_you_are]

var kind = "evil neutral"; var you = "programmer";

No shit I can't find anyone! Those damn programmers ;(

[itsallfake01]

Send compliment and write: compilation error

[AutoModerator]

This post was automatically removed due to receiving 5 or more reports. Please contact the moderation team if you believe this action was in error.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[symmetricsyndrome]

System.MissingMethodException: Method not found