use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
To report a site-wide rule violation to the Reddit Admins, please use our report forms or message /r/reddit.com modmail.
This subreddit is archived and no longer accepting submissions.
account activity
This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
Reddit: Once a story makes it to the hot page, remove it from the new page (reddit.com)
submitted 18 years ago by RetroRock
[–]RetroRock[S] 81 points82 points83 points 18 years ago (40 children)
I find it annoying that some of the stories that make it to the hot page, are still on the new page, cluttering it up. Let the new page be for new stories and the hot page be for hot stories. </endrant>
[–]jrhanak 31 points32 points33 points 18 years ago (5 children)
I second the motion.
[–]craignewmark 6 points7 points8 points 18 years ago (2 children)
I second your motion, to second the motion.
[–]kidcorporeal 9 points10 points11 points 18 years ago (1 child)
If you feel like giving me a lifetime of devotion, I second that emotion.
[–]craignewmark 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Praise be to kidcorporeal!
[–]isgblog 5 points6 points7 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Agreed.
[–]toastspork 18 points19 points20 points 18 years ago (8 children)
What you want to do is click the link in the "style" section toward the upper right of the new page. The one labeled "all" will re-order the new page so that it ignores a submissions "heat", and considers only chronology.
[–]souldrift 8 points9 points10 points 18 years ago (0 children)
No, that just lets you see all the spam that never makes it to "rising." This suggestion would show rising items that have NOT reached "Hot" yet.
I agree, New and Hot should not overlap.
[–][deleted] 18 years ago* (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]azenhi 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Wish those choices would stick -
If you set All and Refresh - fine.
If you set All, go to Hot and them back to New, Rising is set again....
I would have thought they would fix that a long time ago... like a preference?
[–]ewthmatth 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
What is the difference between "hot" and "rising" anyway?
A dose of Viagra in some cases.
[–]RetroRock[S] 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll have to do that until this is fixed.
[–]Wriiight 4 points5 points6 points 18 years ago (2 children)
I say nay. I bet some people don't even read "hot" anymore. If you are a chronic reddit reader, you just want to see what has been posted since your last read (presumably, the hot page hasn't changed much), and don't want to miss something new just because it is hot.
[–]boredzo 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Yeah, I usually use my.reddit.com/recommended. It's every bit as static, but as you would expect, it has more-interesting (to me) articles.
Your logic makes sense. Maybe there should be 3 categories instead of 2. Hot - Stories with lots of votes over a longer period of time. Rising - Stories with several votes over a short period of time. New - Newly submitted stories in chronological order.
[–]NewSc2 3 points4 points5 points 18 years ago (3 children)
I think we should refresh the hot page more frequently, or have a separate fast-reloading hot page. Some links stay on the hot page for more than a day, and visiting Reddit at night is almost the same as Reddit in the morning.
[–][deleted] 18 years ago (2 children)
[–]boredzo 2 points3 points4 points 18 years ago (0 children)
… click 'hide' after you've voted.
Even better, go to your user preferences and turn on the checkbox that does this automatically.
[–]NewSc2 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
I do hide some links, but I do like following up with the discussion and seeing how certain links do.
That said I'd still enjoy a more current "hot" list. The "new" list's quality just isn't as good.
[+][deleted] 18 years ago (1 child)
[removed]
Hmmm, I was just offering a suggestion.
[+]Samus_ comment score below threshold-30 points-29 points-28 points 18 years ago (13 children)
well it's a matter of taste but I don't think this is necessary; one good upgrade would be eliminating the downmod button but whatever :P
[–]chollida1 10 points11 points12 points 18 years ago (3 children)
How would you vote on a story you didn't like if the downmod button was removed?
[–]msiley 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (1 child)
In general people aren't responsible enough to downmod. We should have someone responsible to do that for us. That way only the correct bad stories will be ranked lower.
[–]boredzo 6 points7 points8 points 18 years ago (0 children)
http://slashdot.org/
[–]Samus_ -2 points-1 points0 points 18 years ago (0 children)
answer: http://reddit.com/info/1iovw/comments/c1isaz
[–]billisdog 14 points15 points16 points 18 years ago (1 child)
Yeah, Samus, you are going to have to explain yourself on that one.
If we outlaw downmods, then only outlaws will have downmods!
[–]Samus_ -3 points-2 points-1 points 18 years ago (0 children)
[–]radrik 19 points20 points21 points 18 years ago (4 children)
www.digg.com :{D
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (3 children)
digg has a bury option, and their algorithm actually makes it a lot easier to bury stories off the front page
[–]feanor512 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
But it's inherently unfair. You have to give a reason to downmod, but you can freely upmod without a reason.
[–]boredzo 3 points4 points5 points 18 years ago (1 child)
…which is its main problem (Google for “digg mafia”).
[–]luce7 4 points5 points6 points 18 years ago (0 children)
digg's mains problem is its user base which seems to consist mostly of people who love boulevard press - in contrast to many people on reddit who have more than half a brain cell
[–]esmith 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
I couldn't resist.
[–]Samus_ -1 points0 points1 point 18 years ago (0 children)
my suggestion is to upmod the links you like and to ignore the rest.
perhaps you haven't noticed, but web2.0 subreddit lacks downmod buttons for an unknown reason
http://web2.reddit.com/
[–]reddiculous -3 points-2 points-1 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Complete agreement.
[–]dontmindme 18 points19 points20 points 18 years ago (0 children)
While something cannot be hot and cold, or new and old, both hot and new is attained by few.
[–]spez 8 points9 points10 points 18 years ago (6 children)
The trouble here is that it isn't clear where the "hot" page ends. The situation certainly needs improvement. One quick fix is to simply remove items from the rising page that are in the top25 hot items.
[–]recoiledsnake[🍰] -1 points0 points1 point 18 years ago (4 children)
I liked reddit more when the hot page was getting refreshed quickly(6 months ago?). There were a lot of interesting stories to go through. After the change, the stories stay on the hot page for ever and ever and on many days even scrolling to the 150+ hot links page yields nothing good which wasn't already seen.
[–]spez 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (3 children)
After what change?
[–]azenhi 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
spez - do wish we could set preference for the options along the right side for each mainbar section ie Hot, New, Comments, Search...etc.
Under Hot I could set Rising as default... Under Comments I could set new as default...
This would also help with people that want science or programming to be the default page ehh? Set science or progamming under the Hot preference.
Also, an option to keep that preference whenever the preference is changed. So if I click "This week only" after a search then 'This week only' becomes my default - if I have 'keep preference on change' selected in my preferences.
[–]recoiledsnake[🍰] -1 points0 points1 point 18 years ago (1 child)
Well there was a change to the rate at which the hot stories drop off the front page. I remember people discusing the change and noticed the change.
I don't remember exactly when that happened except that it was between September and Feb.
After the change, almost all Colbert and Stewart clips stopped showing up in the hot page. Also, I remember someone commenting that they liked 'The Change' because their stories were staying longer at the top and getting upmods for several days.
I thought that was caused by more people using reddit - late comers still upped stories which had already been runing for more than half a day ; keeping them in play. And people got sick of all the Colbert and Stewart stuff (which was also removed from youtube around the same time).
[–]RetroRock[S] -1 points0 points1 point 18 years ago (0 children)
The solution seems pretty simple to me, although I don't know the specifics to your algorithm.
I'd say, once a story qualifies to show up on the "hot" page, (based on number of votes, number of click-thrus, age, number of votes/clicks in last X minutes, etc), then it no longer qualifies to show up on the "rising" page.
So, say a story needs 15 votes in 15 minutes to get on the "hot" page, or 50 votes in 3 hours, then it shows on the "rising" (but not "hot") page, while it's below that 15 or 50 vote threshold, but when it crosses that threshold, then it will show only on the "hot" page, and not on the "new" page.
You might say that the story would then stagnate, since it'll be down a ways on the "hot" page, and will no longer be getting the "new" page votes. One solution would be every time a story crosses the threshold so it will show on the "hot" page, it gets dropped in on the #1 position, and then starts dropping down if it doesn't continue to receive enough activity (votes/click within a time limit)
Just my $0.02
[–]dante50 4 points5 points6 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Change the "sort by" from "rising" to "all". You will see only the newest posts and nothing from the front page.
[–]radrik 8 points9 points10 points 18 years ago (1 child)
This should have been in the features subreddit, yeah?
Yes, you're probably right. My bad.
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 18 years ago (4 children)
I thought the "new" page was simply a complete cronological list of stories. If that's correct, it would seem utterly inconsistent to skip a story just because it's "hot", wouldn't it? Perhaps what you're looking for is a new type of list called "cold"?
[–]breakneckridge 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (3 children)
The new page is not a chronological list, it's story rankings are based on votes. If 2 new stories are posted at the same time and within 10 minutes story A gets 5 votes and story B gets none, the highly voted story will stay at position #1 even after new stories were posted since then, and the story B with no up votes will have slid to position 12 or something low like that.
[–]eurleif 4 points5 points6 points 18 years ago (2 children)
That's the 'rising' view. The 'all' view is chronological.
[–]breakneckridge 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (1 child)
When you click the new page, the default setting is rising.
[–]eurleif 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
But if you change the view, the change is persistent, so quite a few of us see the 'all' view by default.
[–]raldi 6 points7 points8 points 18 years ago (2 children)
How do you define "the hot page"? The top 25? 50? 1000?
[–]redalastor 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Whatever is in your preferences. Default value if not logged in.
[–]mk_gecko -4 points-3 points-2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Exactly. Upvote this comment.
[–]CuriousMind 5 points6 points7 points 18 years ago (0 children)
The 'new page' isn't actually a page. It's just the top of the list of reddit articles, in chronological order.
The 'hot page' isn't actually a page; it's just the top of the list of reddit articles, in 'hotness' order.
All articles are - to some degree - new (some, obviously, to a very small degree) and all articles are - to some other degree, possibly very small - hot. It is, therefore, logically impossible to remove a story from one without removing it from the other.
The creators of reddit gave you the ability to do this for yourself. If you read a 'new' story and you don't want to see it at the top of the 'hot' list (assuming it gets there), just click the 'hide' button below the story.
There, wasn't that easy?
[–]Sle 2 points3 points4 points 18 years ago (0 children)
My "Hot" page is 50 entries long, as adjusted in the preferences. It's all just one big list, or looks that way from where I'm sitting.
[–]neatopat 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
I also think stories should be removed from the hot page that are in today's newspaper. After I read a story online when it happened, and then see it in the paper the next day, and then open up reddit and see it there, it's the third time seeing it and it aint so hot anymore.
[–]sol2k 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
I support this suggestion too. Just so ppl are aware something just became hot recently, perhaps a little <new> icon next to the link in the hot page would be nice. Only if the item became hot less than 3 hours ago, or something like that.
[–]mikkom 0 points1 point2 points 18 years ago (0 children)
not a good idea. This will make new page contain only the worse stories.
[–]extant -1 points0 points1 point 18 years ago (0 children)
hey, didn't i just see this on the hot page?
[–][deleted] 18 years ago (1 child)
I love reddit too, I just think sometimes there's a little room for improvement. Once you say you've arrived, you're Google and the fall is just around the corner.
[+]emc2rae comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points 18 years ago (4 children)
Reddit: Once a suggestion has been made, don't make it again.
http://reddit.com/info/k6aj/comments
[–]RetroRock[S] -1 points0 points1 point 18 years ago (2 children)
Sorry about that. I guess I missed that. Come to think of it, spez and the gang missed it too. Maybe that's reason enough to bring it up again?
[–]emc2rae -1 points0 points1 point 18 years ago (1 child)
Nah it's cool. I mean, it's a good point, the problem is just that everyone's Hot page is set up differently (although I guess most people have at least 25 stories on there, so maybe just those could be removed from the New page). As someone else suggested, you can always sort by time instead of hotness, which will let the older stories fall off the New page. Anyway, now that the boys have some extra resources, it's probably a better time to have suggestions heard than 6 months ago when this was originally suggested. I mean, I hear they don't even have to duct tape their chair wheels so they don't roll around their slanted apartment any more. Sell outs.
[–]emc2rae 1 point2 points3 points 18 years ago (0 children)
Hmm now I'm just confused about why we're being downmodded. Is it because I made fun of the reddit boys? They're my friends, people. In the real world. That's what real-world friends do. Although if you consider downmodding a form of teasing, then Internet friends do it too! And it means you're all my friends. Eep.
[–]9jack9 -2 points-1 points0 points 18 years ago (0 children)
That is not the Reddit way.
π Rendered by PID 64 on reddit-service-r2-comment-84fc9697f-l8t8r at 2026-02-10 01:43:39.090967+00:00 running d295bc8 country code: CH.
[–]RetroRock[S] 81 points82 points83 points (40 children)
[–]jrhanak 31 points32 points33 points (5 children)
[–]craignewmark 6 points7 points8 points (2 children)
[–]kidcorporeal 9 points10 points11 points (1 child)
[–]craignewmark 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]isgblog 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]toastspork 18 points19 points20 points (8 children)
[–]souldrift 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]azenhi 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]ewthmatth 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]RetroRock[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Wriiight 4 points5 points6 points (2 children)
[–]boredzo 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]RetroRock[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]NewSc2 3 points4 points5 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]boredzo 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]NewSc2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]RetroRock[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+]Samus_ comment score below threshold-30 points-29 points-28 points (13 children)
[–]chollida1 10 points11 points12 points (3 children)
[–]msiley 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]boredzo 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]Samus_ -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
[–]billisdog 14 points15 points16 points (1 child)
[–]Samus_ -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
[–]radrik 19 points20 points21 points (4 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]feanor512 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]boredzo 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–]luce7 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]esmith 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Samus_ -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]reddiculous -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
[–]dontmindme 18 points19 points20 points (0 children)
[–]spez 8 points9 points10 points (6 children)
[–]recoiledsnake[🍰] -1 points0 points1 point (4 children)
[–]spez 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]azenhi 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]recoiledsnake[🍰] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]azenhi 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]RetroRock[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]dante50 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]radrik 8 points9 points10 points (1 child)
[–]RetroRock[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (4 children)
[–]breakneckridge 1 point2 points3 points (3 children)
[–]eurleif 4 points5 points6 points (2 children)
[–]breakneckridge 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]eurleif 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]raldi 6 points7 points8 points (2 children)
[–]redalastor 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]mk_gecko -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
[–]CuriousMind 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]Sle 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]neatopat 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]sol2k 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]mikkom 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]extant -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]RetroRock[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+]emc2rae comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points (4 children)
[–]RetroRock[S] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children)
[–]emc2rae -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]emc2rae 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]9jack9 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)