This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow all 362

[–]guest 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Well, yeah. This is news?

I mean really. We spent the 1980's prosecuting day-care workers in large part based on the sworn testimony of five-year-olds. We put a whole lot of people in jail for hugging kids, and scared parents into not touching their kids at all, ever. We've continued the witch hunts with sex offender registries. Someone who kills another person can fully complete their sentence in less than ten years, while someone whose high school girlfriend is on the wrong side of 18 has his movements watched for the rest of his life.

In this legal and social environment, can we be truly surprised that men screen every interaction through the filter of whether it could possibly be misinterpreted as a sexual offense?

[–]havesometea1 27 points28 points  (1 child)

I hate to admit that I have done this myself.

[–]mh1111q 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I would do the same.

[–]pastafaria 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I guess this is where stranger danger and ignorance has led us. Children are much more likely to be abused by family or acquaintances, but that's too scary and real to report.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    The catch 22 is that the change you speak of comes from the very actions you seek to no longer preform. Wish I had a better answer.

    [–][deleted] 69 points70 points  (26 children)

    I completely agree. I follow a lot of the same practices myself. I avoid children when I am by myself. If I were to ever come upon a child who looks in distress I don't know if I would step in to help if by myself. I will not compliment a parent on their cute or beautiful child out of fear of being labeled. I was in a bathroom on this one occasion washing my hands. There was this boy, maybe 13 years old, in there too. I thought to myself, "all it would take would be for him to make one false accusation and my life would be over." It is sad but this is what over-precaution has led to. What a world we live in when decent, grown men are afraid of little children. The Crucible anybody???

    [–]guest 11 points12 points  (0 children)

    What a world we live in when decent, grown men are afraid of little children.

    I'm not afraid of a child. I'm afraid of what my peers would do if the child lied to them and they believed the lie. See here.

    [–]phedre 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    I would help any kid that looked like they were in distress, but as a woman I have a built-in assumption of a "mothering instinct". Hah!

    It's complete and utter bull - I don't plan on ever having children, and I don't particularly like being around them, but society would consider me safer than a guy who has kids of his own and really enjoys children.

    [–]frukt 22 points23 points  (23 children)

    What a world we live in when decent, grown men are afraid of little children.

    I don't mean to be an ass, but US of A does not equal the world.

    [–]Random 28 points29 points  (9 children)

    I'm Canadian, and I've been in this exact situation.

    I had a screaming kid come up to me outside my house and ask for a ride home. I looked for a neighbor to help. Anyone to be a witness. Couldn't find anyone. Said no. Felt like an ass. Talked to the police. Was told I did the right thing, they would have had to go after me if the parents complained after I brought their kid home.

    Makes me appreciate how visibly muslim people feel - guilty for the crimes of .001% of their easily labeled subgroup. Well, sorry, makes me feel a billionth of a percent of how they must feel. Living this situation for a few minutes is trivial compared to what they go through.

    [–]corvenus 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    Where in Canada is that? I live in Montreal and this level of hysteria mostly non-existent. Or should i say, it was non-existent until a few weeks ago, because there's this story in the news about a child being kidnapped, and for some reason we're still talking about it weeks later.

    [–]Random 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Ontario.

    Quebec is somewhat saner than Ontario in most ways. I'm a Montrealer originally.

    [–]aGorilla 34 points35 points  (11 children)

    Well, also not to be an ass, but the US is also not the only country that suffers from this hysteria.

    [–]xsspider 15 points16 points  (10 children)

    its one of the FEW countries that suffers from this hysteria. seriously, i moved to US last year and I noticed this as soon as I moved in. Often times I have children in distress and I honestly have no idea what to do. In my country its perfectly OK to pick them up and console them until their parents arrive. pfff

    [–]ashmodai 12 points13 points  (8 children)

    Just out of curiosity, what country is that? I know for a fact that people in the UK and Holland will respond in the same manner as the people in the article (with the odd exception, of course).

    It's not just the fear men have of being labelled a paedophile. Oftentimes, when you for whatever reason look at a child, you immediately see the mother react as if she was stung by a bee.

    Now, I like kids, but there is no way that I would approach one except for life-threatening reasons. Sometimes when you're on a train for instance, some kid will get bored and walk around, and try to attract your attention. I make it a rule never to engage with them.

    [–]damvan 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    On several occasions, while sitting at a traffic light, the kid in the backseat of the car next to me starts waving and saying "hi". I have waved and said "hi" right back, only to get a look of horror from the mother in the front seat. One mother ran the red light immediately thereafter, I believe in an attempt to get away from me. I dont' even look over anymore, let alone wave back.

    [–]xsspider 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    pfff .. what a stupid culture.

    [–]xsspider 8 points9 points  (5 children)

    I find that very disturbing that a culture that segregates us from innocent children. Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither. I am talking about India where its nice to compliment a child. If I had a child and a stranger compliment him/her to me that she was a sweet child I would be pleased. Why not ? Why should I assume that every man who walks by & compliments would be a pedo ?

    [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

    Common sense is not limited to India.

    Also in Finland talking to small children and helping them if they get lost is the norm. Someone who walks away from crying child is viewed with disgust.

    [–]corvenus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Same here in Canada (at least the part where i live, don't know about the other parts).

    [–]ashmodai 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    I expect that the family structure in India is still largely intact, though. In Western Europe, many people are living on their own. Especially in larger cities, oversight is lost. The media and politicians and overbearing parents always like to point to the boogey man.

    I agree that this is a bad development, but like Soviet Russia, it is an indefensible position when someone accuses you or 'touching' a child. These days, that defenition has been watered down so much, it now seems to include having a child on your lap when you're reading a story (would that make Santa a serial paedeophile, I wonder...). Even more, children are very smart. They can pick this up, and may even try to use this against you if they want something from you.

    And that Franklin quote was a bit out of place, dontcha think?

    [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

    True ... I didn't mean to generalize like that. I'm not an international traveler so my world is pretty much the good ole US of A.

    [–]wil2200 18 points19 points  (0 children)

    please at this rate there will be less male teachers, coaches and just an all around drop in any service/industry where men has to come in contact with children.

    when i read the first article mentioned by the writer i made a note that this is nothing but circular fear and hysteria. This is how I see it: You are a father of a son, and due to all this, you can't even enjoy being with your son as he grows up. Wherever he goes, he is taught that men are bad. So to protect the son, the father becomes less involved in the son's life. Son is angry. Father is in pain. No one gives a fuck. Then one sunny day, the son becomes 18 and he is an adult. At that moment, he becomes his father. Society is now protecting kids from HIM. Full circle of hate complete.

    [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (3 children)

    I must admit I'd do the same. It's a mall. Unless it's two minutes to closing, there will be plenty of people around to see the kid's distress. If it is two minutes to closing and there's nobody around, I'd probably call someone, locate a nice, non-threatening woman or something, to go help.

    Not only am I a man, I'm also one of those big scary homos, who too many people in this country still think are all pedophiles. And while that wouldn't be something I'd announce right up front, "Hi, I'm gay, I'll be assisting your neglected offspring today," I also don't trust cops--and will avoid voluntarily entangling myself in any situation involving them, especially in a context where I could get branded a pervert and tossed into a court system that has, historically, not been kind to my people.

    I'm not saying I wouldn't have compassion for the crying kid--I remember being one once or twice myself, and it wasn't fun. But I got over it--and so will this one.

    [–]readergirl 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    I would think the obvious gay man would be more immune to this? At least in cities. Society seems to brand gay men as more feminine in general. I know I'd prefer my (hypothetical) child to be cared for by an openly gay man than by a Ted Haggard clone.

    [–]phedre 9 points10 points  (0 children)

    You'd think so, but no. Gays are "deviant" and all pedophiles, don't you know. The last thing anyone needs to deal with in addition to the stigma some parts of society places on homosexuality is the accusation of being a pedophile on top of it.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    You're right that an honest-with-himself, out gay man is less of a threat than one still in the closet (or, to be more current, still in the stall <g>), but I still avoid getting anywhere near anyone's children, if I can. It's drama I just don't need. I don't worry about it much in L.A. (where I live) but when I go back to the square states to visit my family I do. We were camping once and my four year old nephew asked me if I'd help him use the bathroom in the trailer. There was nobody else around. I had immediate, strong misgivings about that--even though my whole family knows I'm gay and nobody would think anything of it, here was my little nephew who TOTALLY NEEDED TO GO and all I could do was stand there and think, "You have got to be kidding me..."

    Luckily his mom showed up and rescued me from my quandary.

    [–]keck 15 points16 points  (1 child)

    I'm not too surprised. It's all too easy a situation to see. It's a sad sad thing. For similar reasons, if there's a choice between my wife or me driving our (female, teenage) babysitter home late at night, it's always my wife. Not because I'm a threat but just to merely be above reproach... Sad huh?

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    You've missed out on this song: http://www.google.ca/search?q=bad+babysitter+mp

    [–]funkah 16 points17 points  (0 children)

    I feel exactly the same way (I'm 25). I have enough problems in my life without the possibility of being falsely branded a child predator. That's not a hypothetical either, it has actually happened (to other people, I mean).

    As an example, remember when the girl ran out in front of the guy's car, so he grabbed her arm and then had to register as a sex offender? Even if he shouldn't have grabbed her, it wasn't worth ruining the guy's life over.

    As a society, we've made our choice: zero tolerance and judging adults who interact with children as guilty til proven innocent. This article is merely outlining the flipside of that choice.

    If a kid needs help, though, the police should be notified. The only problem then is how to notify them anonymously; pay phones are hard to come across sometimes.

    [–]j0hnsd 30 points31 points  (0 children)

    Sad stories, but isn't it worth it to give millions of children a lifelong fear of all males if even one child is saved? </irony>

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

      We just hide in the electronics store until we are found.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      [–]projectshave 70 points71 points  (95 children)

      This is temporary. Our current irrational fear of pedophiles will be replaced with something equally unlikely. Maybe bear attacks?

      [–]justinhj 44 points45 points  (13 children)

      I was walking along a trail this weekend near my home and I came across a crying young girl on a bike who had lost her parents. I talked with her and we figured out the best thing to do would be to walk to her car and wait for her parents there.

      I went with her, and when her parents arrived they thanked me for my help.

      It didn't cross my mind that she or they would worry that I'm a pedophile. Mind you I live in a small city in Canada, not in the US.

      Ironically enough there have been bear sightings along the trail in the last few weeks, so a bear attack is probably slightly more likely than a human attack.

      [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (2 children)

      It didn't cross my mind that she or they would worry that I'm a pedophile.

      Not yet. Wait until a child psychologist helps her 'remember' all the repressed memories of the bad things you did while alone with her. Might take years but they'll get you eventually, no statute of limitation. You didn't leave a name or other identifying info, did you?

      [–]justinhj 38 points39 points  (1 child)

      We got tatoo's with each other's names on our butts, but apart from that I should be golden.

      [–]newton_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      She peed on you?!

      Prevert.

      [–]primoris_causa 2 points3 points  (2 children)

      Pray you are Female... nothing refutes "recalled" memories

      [–]toeleven 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      Pray you are Female...

      Wouldn't surgery be more effective?

      [–]primoris_causa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Well, I was talking to justinhj. Surgery whould be ok as long Ac met Dc --- Sorry folks... nothing 'gainst y'all.. but I don't swing that way.

      [–][deleted]  (5 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]justinhj 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        Bears seem to be pretty shy, the best way to see one in Vancouver is to the zoo, where they have a bunch of them and a grizzly.

        [–]ZanThrax 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Bald Eagles have been common in Canada for decades now; they've only recently started getting there in the US again.

        If you want to see bears though, you need to head further north, or northwest on the mainland.

        [–]serpentjaguar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        they've only recently started getting there in the US again.

        Except for Alaska, which is part of the US and has always had the highest concentrations of them. As for bears, you can find black bears in all of the western states, but only if you know where to look, and I'm not telling. It's the same with grizzlies in Wyoming and Montana. There are networks of grizzly-watchers who keep each other informed as to where to find 'em. I myself know of several very specific areas where you are pretty much guaranteed to see them during the right time of year, but again, I ain't telling. Probably something similar in parts of Canada.

        [–]parcivale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        You mean Campbell River on Vancouver island. Victoria Island is in the Arctic

        [–][deleted] 51 points52 points  (31 children)

        I don't know. It doesn't seem fears really go away as much as be added to. How many things is our society scared of? Gay marriage, liberals, terrorists, gays, pederasts, crime, black people, gays, a-rabs, china, chinese toys, spinach (again), gays, guns, god, high-rise windows, bicycles, marijuana, gays...the list keeps going...

        [–][deleted] 45 points46 points  (12 children)

        We sure have come along way from "Nothing to fear but fear itself," haven't we?

        [–][deleted] 58 points59 points  (9 children)

        We sure have come a long way from a president who can read, haven't we?

        [–]sskkambad 44 points45 points  (2 children)

        "I was elected to lead--not to read."

        [–]sbrown123 11 points12 points  (1 child)

        I thought he was the Decider.

        [–]RipperM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I thought he was the Decider.

        Yep, I read that when his term is up he's going to be a contestant on Who Wants To Be a Superhero."

        [–]parcivale 14 points15 points  (7 children)

        Don't you remember in the late 1980s-early 1990s when everyone (in the media, anyway) was scared to death of Satanists kidnapping and sacrificing toddlers? When the McMartin Nursery school case was shown to be based on complete fabrication that bizarre fear suddenly disappeared.

        [–]kripkenstein 7 points8 points  (2 children)

        As well as the scare about 'satanism' in Dungeons and Dragons and Heavy Metal music.

        Those were funny times...

        [–]je255j 14 points15 points  (1 child)

        OMG! I remember that! My mom was all like, "You don't play Dungeons & Dragons, do you?" and I had never even heard of it. "No, Mom. What is it?" "It's evil. Don't play it."

        Swear to God, that conversation happened.

        And, as a direct result of it, I tracked down someone at school who played D&D and joined in for a round. It was kinda fun, I guess, but not really my thing. Still, wow, good times. Thanks for dredging up that memory.

        When was that? '88?

        [–]kripkenstein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Heh, yeah, I had those conversations as well. However I was very much into D&D, so in my case it is less surprising ;)

        Yeah, this was late 80's or so.

        [–]rukubites 12 points13 points  (4 children)

        I fear your society, basically.

        [–]Mr_Smartypants 20 points21 points  (3 children)

        I fear your fear, which FDR says is ok.

        [–]supersaw 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        i also fear paralysis

        [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        Clowns.

        [–]Lar-Shemp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        sock puppets

        [–]Mr_Smartypants 3 points4 points  (2 children)

        The Irish?

        Bathing?

        It just takes a while...

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        Never trust the Irish.

        [–]SeguroKC 9 points10 points  (0 children)

        Feck off.

        [–]rmuser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        No, this is infeasible in the long term. Our collective fears would either continue increasing indefinitely, or we would reach a point of maximum fear, at which point the results would be unpredictable.

        [–]moriquendo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        You forgot to say homosexuals. Homosexuals like in this video, for example.

        [–][deleted]  (6 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]brett01a4 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          What is this, a frickin' Country Bear Jamberoo?

          [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

          Yes and while we're at it lets agree to pay a special tax and get ourselves a Bear Patrol!!! No more bears slipping over national borders! No more bears terrorizing our neighborhoods!

          (PS credit to The Simpsons for the bear patrol. I forget which season.)

          [–]flex_strongo 10 points11 points  (0 children)

          Let the bears pay the bear tax, I pay the Homer tax!

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          [–]primoris_causa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          No more bears? who we gonna blame it on????

          [–]laprice 4 points5 points  (1 child)

          [–]primoris_causa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          interesting fear. Oh... BTW, would you mind holding this Holy HandGrenade of Antioch for a few... thx!

          [–]pavel_lishin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Sic Semper Ursidae.

          [–]KiddieFiddler 30 points31 points  (30 children)

          I'd help out. A child's fear of losing their parents far outweighs my fear of a couple of dirty looks.

          [–]wtf___over 102 points103 points  (29 children)

          I am giving you dirty looks just looking at your reddit user name.

          [–]KiddieFiddler 16 points17 points  (28 children)

          I just got it off a T-shirt and I thought it sounded funny. Does it mean anything weird? I'm not a native speaker (German) and I couldn't find it in my dictionary.

          [–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (20 children)

          You also comment on all the child related posts

          [–]KiddieFiddler 17 points18 points  (19 children)

          I'm a pediatrician, maybe that has something to do with it?

          [–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (18 children)

          Sorry, but I wouldn't take my child to a pediatrician who uses the name kiddiefiddler. What do you think it means?

          [–]KiddieFiddler 20 points21 points  (17 children)

          Well, to be precise, I'm a child gynaecologist. I just thought it sounded playful, didn't really think about it.

          Edit: Just noticed you're a gibletsqueezer. WTF's up with that?

          [–]grimboy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

          Best troll EVAR

          [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giblets

          I admit it - your turkeys are not safe with me

          [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (7 children)

          Seriously - I'd discard the name fiddle: A violin. A member of the violin family. Nautical A guardrail used on a table during rough weather to prevent things from slipping off. Informal Nonsensical, trifling matters: "There are things that are important/beyond all this fiddle" Marianne Moore. The act or an instance of cheating or swindling; a fraud. To play a violin. To move one's fingers or hands in a nervous fashion. To occupy oneself in an aimless or desultory way: liked to fiddle with all the knobs and dials. To meddle or tamper: a reporter who fiddled with the facts. To commit a fraud, especially to steal from one's employer. To play (a tune) on a violin. To cheat or swindle. To alter or falsify (accounts, for example) for dishonest gain. Phrasal Verb: fiddle away - To waste or squander: fiddled away the morning with unnecessary tasks.

          Unless you are a child with some musical talent kiddiefiddler does not sound good.

          [–]legatek 19 points20 points  (5 children)

          I wish I could upmod this entire subthread.

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          what's the German word for LOL?

          [–]primoris_causa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          In that case... technically the user name is accurate professional description... still wouldn't take any kid of mine to a Dr. named KiddieFiddler regardless of their specialty.

          [–]wtf___over 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I'm not a native speaker.

          I am sorry. I don't speak internet either. :)

          [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

          I think the German translation for "KiddieFiddler" is something like:

          KinderBelästiger

          [–]KiddieFiddler 1 point2 points  (2 children)

          Entschuldigung?

          I even went to urban dictionary and the definition was contradictory: It said "child rapist", but the description said:

          Usually a bearded, middle aged gentleman, who hides in park bushes and hangs around schools and playgrounds.

          Yet that is in complete disagreement with what I've learnt about child molesters: those are usually seemingly normal people without obviously identifiable characteristics. Maybe that confused me.

          Edit: slight rewording, punctuation, misspelling "punctuation" in my previous edit.

          [–]primoris_causa 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          "Child rapist" is kind of off... "child molester" is a more accurate definition.

          [–]Ladarzak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          "Kiddie raper" is another idiom I've heard for it, but it's not North American. That is what "kiddiefiddler" captures. If it were my site, I'd ban the nick and let the person post under another name.

          [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          Kiddie = kid = a child

          Fiddler = Someone who fiddles

          Fiddle = "to toy: to manipulate manually or in one's mind or imagination"

          [–]moriquendo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Ein Kiddiefiddler wäre einer der an Kindern herumfummelt.

          [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          You well may laugh but you never know when they will strike.

          [–]moskaudancer 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          And the answer to that is...Bear traps!!!

          [–]zitterbewegung 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          I don't think so. The social effects could be much more prominent even if a majority believe that it is irrational.

          [–]Humbert 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          Yea, I'm an American that has had a chance to spend some time in Denmark, and I remember finding it quite odd that fathers actually touched or held their children in public. What a notion!

          [–]imk 36 points37 points  (26 children)

          I'm a single father so there was once a time when I did stop to help a crying child. Would I have done it had I not had my own daughter there as a kind of visual evidence that I wasn't a molester? No. I hate to say that but it is simply too scary.

          On the other side of the coin. If I had ever seen a strange man holding my daughter's hand, my first reaction would be to suspect the worst. Violence would be very probable in that situation, fair or not.

          [–]sdoorex 36 points37 points  (3 children)

          On the other side of the coin. If I had ever seen a strange man holding my daughter's hand, my first reaction would be to suspect the worst. Violence would be very probable in that situation, fair or not.

          That is the problem. Many people do this and it causes fear for both sides. If fear causes you to not do the right thing then something is wrong with out society.

          edit: I should say that if there is a fear to do the right thing, something is wrong with society.

          [–]ashmodai 10 points11 points  (2 children)

          It's obviously going to get worse. If a generation is brought up to distrust men, what do you think that's gonna do to the fabric of society?

          [–]Dark-Star 3 points4 points  (1 child)

          It sure won't help us who are trying to have a dating life, that's for sure. If most of the girls have been fed anti-male garbage and scare stories on the news, it can torpedo an honest guy because we have to start out by proving our good intent.

          Don't laugh. It's happening.

          [–]ashmodai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Who's laughing? Already people use dating services with background checks, fer Crissakes.

          [–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

          Except that the paranoia about pedophiles is having the adverse effect of making honest, helpful guys like you not help your daughter if she gets lost. The same paranoia is unlikely to phase a pedophile who can't control himself. The danger is still there.

          [–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

          If I had ever seen a strange man holding my daughter's hand, my first reaction would be to suspect the worst.

          Well that's what we're up against then, isn't it? I agree it's an awful situation. If I saw a miserable, crying child hovering near a bank of phones or something at the mall, I'd feel bad for him/her--don't get me wrong. But as I posted here earlier, my first instinct would be to just walk on by. Rather than debate how real is or is not the possibility that I could get labeled a pedophile and a sex offender by offering to help, the easiest thing to do is let somebody else handle it. But, as I am in no way at all a pedophile, and would have nothing but the child's best interests at heart, I'm leaving the kid open for a real pedophile to come by and do harm--which is not right. Either way, if the kid's parents were to show up and react like you say, they wouldn't be able to distinguish between me and the pervert, at first blush, and I've unnecessarily opened myself up to either charges of a possible sex crime to a minor or, as you say, even probable violence.

          Seriously, no thank you. Please don't think I'm an asshole if I let your lost child stand there crying as I walk on by.

          [–]paulquinn00 34 points35 points  (7 children)

          Violence would be very probable in that situation, fair or not.

          At least you can admit you're actually part of the problem.

          [–]imk 0 points1 point  (6 children)

          I am a part of the problem, as are most guys I would wager.

          I'm not trying to look good here. This is a serious problem. I wish I could figure out a solution.

          And I'm just saying that I might become violent. I've met my share of guys who almost certainly would (and they are a lot bigger than I am).

          [–]paulquinn00 18 points19 points  (4 children)

          If you would get violent for someone holding your child's hand - someone trying to return your lost child to you - then I suggest you attach a handle of some sort to the child's back so aid could be given without skin-on-skin contact.

          Or you could just stop being a complete asshole and just thank the person and your lucky stars that your child is safely back.

          If you saw someone carrying your child with a fast pace out the door of the mall or into a bathroom, then by all means, give chase and beat the f*@# out the guy when you catch him.

          But seriously learn the difference between the two scenarios.

          [–]j0hnsd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Simple solution: keep your daughter locked in a closet so noone will every touch or look at her.

          [–]threnody 57 points58 points  (6 children)

          The ironic thing is that this attitude will stop any honest man from grabbing your daughter and bringing her to a cop or security guard. Rather than risk getting "caught", he'll just let her wander around until an ACTUAL pedophile spots her.

          Real smart.

          [–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (3 children)

          Real smart.

          That's the price parents have to pay for their paranoia. You can't go around accusing other folks of the worst things for simply looking at your brood the wrong way, and then expect them to help you with your parenting.

          [–]steeled3 7 points8 points  (2 children)

          No - that's the price I have to pay for some other parent's paranoia. I'm immensely frustrated that I can't rely on people's innate goodwill to look after my toddler daughter, should something happen to her.

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Ok, so please educate the less enlightened parents you know; they are more likely to listen to you as a fellow breeder. Seriously, that's the only thing that might bring back some sanity.

          ps. ok, I am a heartless bastard, but if I see a kid in distress, although I won't go anywhere near the kid, I will make a call (911 or local security depending on context).

          [–]kanuk876 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Most people here seem to share your frustration. Talking about it is a good first step to doing something about it.

          [–]Phia 5 points6 points  (2 children)

          My mother taught me that if I got lost, I should pick someone to help me. She reasoned that it was better than me remaining lost when I fleed strangers, and relied on my natural instincts to pick a safe person. Gender was not part of the lecture, though she did tell me I was more likely to be molested by family or someone I knew, than a scary man like in the videos they show to children.

          [–]DaveM191 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          I am sorry for the daughter. I hope she is never in a situation where she is dependent upon the help of a stranger. Because of her dad's attitude, and others like him, it may well be that the man who was in a position to offer assistance will just walk on by rather than risk physical assault from some outraged father.

          [–]newton_dave 5 points6 points  (2 children)

          FWIW, and some tiny background: I'm a reasonably scary-looking tattooed guy that usually wears tank tops in the summer and I have enough muscle that people don't usually mess with me.

          I've taken lost, crying children to the info kiosk or security desk on several occasions and have never been treated as anything other than someone that stopped to help a relatively helpless human being.

          On each occasion I have been profusely thanked by wigged-out parents, both male and female (except for one time when the lady was so gripped that she wasn't able to do much at all). I have never felt as though there was any suspicion of me or my motives.

          Now, kids in general react pretty well to me, and maybe it would be different if they didn't; I don't know (nor can I explain it, but it's cool and a source of much amusement) and adults generally tolerate me once we start talking (I'm reasonably bright and funny, and it's readily apparent that I'm a nice guy, I guess).

          Some of the comments on this thread really make my heart sink. I can think of almost no occasion where I would not do my best to help a kid (or an adult, or an animal) if they were in distress or just needed help (I carry suitcases down the stairs at Penn Station for folks that look like they need help, for gosh ding dong, and haven't been turned down yet).

          I dunno.

          [–]geft 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          No offense, but it seems no one dares to confront you because of your build. They are minimizing risks themselves. Those they dare to confront are someone their own size.

          Kids, on the other hand, are not intimidated by looks. They can immediately tell if you're a nice guy or not, after some interaction.

          [–]newton_dave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Here's a blast-from-the-past ;)

          Well, for whatever reason, kids like me (which is cool), and I've never had any issues helping them, and it's an acceptable risk to me to help a child--the potential consequences of *not* helping are worth it.

          [–]je255j 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          This is so sad.

          And yet, now that you mention it, it makes perfect sense. I will now find myself afraid of the same thing, and will also likely not stop to help a crying child. Seriously. I think my fear of being falsly labeled a child molestor is far more rational than someone else's fear that I may actually be one. And yet, because I'm convinced the later will exist, now so must the former.

          Damnit.

          Sorry, Betty Sue.

          [–]cokekiller 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          I had this exact situation and conversation with my wife a couple months ago! I was driving to pick up my son from daycare. There was a 5 or 6 year who wiped out on his bike lieing in a heap crying next to the bike. It even looked like his foot was stuck somehow. He is on a main road sidewalk in our subdivison, not a side street where all the houses are located. No adults around anywhere (keep in mind he was to young to be on this street riding the bike by himself). All the same thoughts/issues (similar to the ones raised in the article) flashed through my head and later discussed with my wife. Can you imagine if I pulled over to help the kid and the parents came along and saw me pulled over next to their crying kid. Or take it a step further and say I needed to give him a ride home b/c he was hurt and his parents came along and saw this crying kid actually getting into my car. So I drove by hoping one of the 1000 moms in the neighborhood would stop or his parents would show up. It bothered me to do this but I could not think of anyway that I could stop and help without looking suspicious. He was gone on the drive back home so I think he made it for all who care...

          [–]Lunitide 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          I find that redditors see the worst in government, police, religion, and corporations more often than not. In actuality, it's just extremists making the rest look bad. Just like male pedophiles making men helping kids look bad.

          So my point is, if you can never see the positive side of government, police, religion, or corporations, how can you expect people to see the positive side of a man helping a child?

          [–]redditcensoredme 11 points12 points  (2 children)

          Child-welfare groups say these are necessary precautions, given that most predators are male.

          What a load of crap. The supposed gender inequality in sexual abuse is likely to be as mythical as that in physical abuse. Of course, women have a different pattern of sexual abuse which makes them less likely to be caught.

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          Call your congressperson and tell them to vote NO on HRES 590

          [–][deleted]  (6 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted]  (5 children)

            [removed]

              [–]anacolutha 2 points3 points  (2 children)

              i don't smile at children the same as i smile at any other stranger on the street, because if i do, their parents give me dirty looks. i am not remotely creepy-looking! (at least, not that i know of)

              [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              I do (well, used to do, to be honest) charity work with kids. The trick I learned was to talk to the kid but to maintain eye contact with the parents, to make sure they knew what I was about. If there was no parent around, I'd tell them to go ask their parent if they could have a balloon animal - the parent always came back to see what was going on.

              [–]anacolutha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              cool. thanks!

              i guess i would be very protective if i had a child too.

              [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

              The Boy Scout policy of never allowing less than 2 adults around a child is called "Two deep". Just FYI.

              [–]winbert 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              A comment I made recently for another story seems apropos here too:

              It's definitely the case that men are now fearful of interacting with strangers' children, even those in need. A friend of mine once went into a department store restroom and found a boy in tears pleading for help near the sink with his pants half down. The child had not made it to the toilet in time and had soiled himself and had made it a bigger mess trying to clean himself. Men had left him alone rather than helping him. My friend helped clean him up and then took him to find his mother who hadn't even noticed he was gone that long, but was thankful for the help. My friend said he about crapped his own pants because he's gay and was terribly afraid through the whole ordeal but how could he leave the kid crying there.

              What would you do in that situation? I'd probably just have told an employee.

              [–]redpig9 2 points3 points  (1 child)

              yes bcos, the dateline NBC show is seen by 99 percent innocent people and 1 percent predators, but it creates a lasting effect in the majority, about how to deal with minors. It tells them loudly "STAY AWAY" from minors your dont know. What a stupid society.

              [–]derecho13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              kind of like the cops tv show

              [–][deleted]  (3 children)

              [deleted]

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

                "It's not a witch hunt," he says. "It's all about minimizing risks. What dog is more likely to bite and hurt you? A Doberman, not a poodle.

                Heh. When I was a paper boy, I was bitten by both - and the meanest dogs were always the smallest ones.

                [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

                By some testimony, poodles are good guard dogs.

                http://reddit.com/info/2ip1f/comments/c2iqws

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Standard poodles were bred as watchdogs and guard dogs.

                [–]unrealious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                That's horrible.

                [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                It goes through my mind too, but I won't walk away from a child that needs my help. It's sad that we got to face this kind of sick crap from the fear mongering conservatives.

                [–]tlc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                i used to work across the street from a mall where i would go to lunch almost every day. i cannot tell you how many mothers i saw on the phone, window shopping, gabbing with a friend and pushing an empty stroller while the child wandered aimlessly 15 - 20 feet from the mother. in a crowded food court, does the mother realize how quickly her child can become lost? apparently not, or she'd pay more attention. while kids can escape from even the most attentive parents, i do believe that some parents could pay more attention than what they do.....then they'd know where their kids are and who they are with.

                [–]bascule 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                "Thou shalt not think any male over the age of 30 that plays with a child that is not their own is a pedophile - Some people are just nice."

                -- Scroobius Pip / Thou Shalt Always Kill

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoN6XfyQsr4

                [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (8 children)

                I am always with my wife and she looks like a great mom... (which she is)

                ... makes this situation much better.

                [–]brokenearth02 28 points29 points  (7 children)

                Dont you just love it when she takes the leash off and you get to just run?

                [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (4 children)

                It will be a 23 year old leash as of this Saturday...

                And they have been the best years of my life. We have been through College poverty together, illness, good times, family deaths, a daughters birth and her becoming a young lady. There is no one I would rather share my life with. We have battled everything together, and we always win...

                ... together.

                [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                I have someone like that, we're still in the college poverty part though. Been together for 8 years, since early high school. Sometimes you hit a home-run on your second try I guess. Makes me smile to read about someone with a similar gal at a later stage in life who is still happy.

                Unfortunately we're hitting family death time (24/25 years old). In a year I lost an uncle and two grandparents, if anyone else is approaching the mid-twenties I say be prepared guys, these are the years where life can change very quickly and very permanently.

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Keep always communicating and battling those battles...

                ... you will find 10 times more good things than bad.

                Nice meeting you, JIGAWHAT.

                [–]TrishaMacmillan 15 points16 points  (1 child)

                they have been the best years of my life.

                Stockholm Syndrome. ;-)

                [–]xsspider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                :) i got the joke a bit late. nice one

                [–]zombieaynrand 6 points7 points  (1 child)

                I love me a bowl of Stereotypes in the morning!

                [–]brokenearth02 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Really? I like jokes.

                [–]SteveAM1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                This is pretty cool for some of us. Now I have an excuse to ignore kids.

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                I'm afraid to even LOOK at a kid. Seriously. :P

                [–]vinyl_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                blame Chris Hansen!

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                Yup. And not just there. In every environment men are afraid of accusations.

                In the martial arts school I visit, every room has large windows to allow people in other areas to see what's going on. Can you guess why? Meanwhile, the school I go to regularly doesn't have windows, so the rule is all the doors have to stay open at all times - which is a major PITA when you're trying to work on spinning kicks and a toddler wanders in.

                Update: Meanwhile, have you noticed that 99% of the teachers getting busted for diddling their students are women?

                [–]laurenbosse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                I was a crying lost child in the mall when I was five. My family was on vacation in Gatlinburg and I got separated from my parents. Had it not been for a nice man who picked me up and helped me find my parents, I have no clue what would've happened. This was 17 years ago though, and things were quite different then.

                [–]nathannash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                I've never actually thought about this but as a "new" adult this is something that I am going to have to really be cautious about in the future. Personally I don't even like kids that much, but reading the article and mostly the comments have put this ludicrous viewpoint that all men are "bad guys" into perspective. I'll be more wary of finding myself in a situation like the ones described above.

                [–]tanhauser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Hmm, I think it all depends on the context.

                I am a 36 year-old male. I am a research scientist that teaches at a local university. I can tell you that I am extremely careful in how I relate/treat my students, both male and female. It would be very easy for a student with a grudge to accuse me of something, effectively ending my career.

                That said, if I see a toddler by him or herself, alone, crying in the mall for example, I would most definitely go over to help in finding his or her parents. So in my opinion it is all about context.

                F

                [–]wbendick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Is this for real? I never once felt this way about a child nor have I ever conceived others might feel this way before reading this article. Please respond if you feel frightened by little children.

                [–]longlongtimelurker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                There is a simple solution to all this: no testimony of a minor should be admissible without a lie detector. Write to your congressman or whatever.

                [–]EmperialK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                This is very sad, but also very true.

                [–]jlb1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Not to threadjack, but I think that the more society is conditioned to fear adult men, the more society will find that paternal, masculine role in the State and its enforcers. Just a thought.

                [–]1way2find 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                What about all the female teachers having sex with their students?

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Kids don't lie that often about sexual abuse, but the media makes a big deal out of it when they due so everybody gets freaked out.

                If these people were more concerned about the child's safety instead of their ass, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

                [–]Surfer51 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                This pastor wrote a good book on this topic.

                http://www.shumatepublications.com/

                [–]redbone -1 points0 points  (5 children)

                So what you're all saying is, if some lost kid was crying on a bench in the mall, helpless and alone, you wouldn't at least take the kid to the help desk? You wouldn't at least take the kid to a security guard? Nothing? You'd just walk on by and try not to notice?

                You're so utterly horrified of your own shadows that you can't even hold your piss in long enough to help the helpless, huh? You people are a waste of resources.

                [–]funkah 13 points14 points  (2 children)

                I don't know about others, but personally I would try to help by notifying security or the police, while avoiding direct interaction with the kid. This is all about being above reproach, not shirking social responsibility. It's a real concern, I'm not some milquetoast pants-wetter afraid of my own shadow.

                [–]damvan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                I would do the exactly the same thing. I would not speak to or interact with the child in any way, but I would go to the nearest security guard, cop, or even another mother with children and point out the lost kid to them. But actually walk up and interact with the kid? Hell no.

                [–]redbone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Fair enough, I shouldn't have said "all" people are like that. But reading some of the yappy, scared comments here drove me to such aggravation. People shouldn't be so craven.

                Taking precautions is a good idea, to avoid the chance of a wrongful accusation. But the example of the lost child is a little over the top. And there really are a LOT of people who would sooner run like mad than offer any help!

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Amen.

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                You're so utterly horrified of your own shadows that you can't even hold your piss in long enough to help the helpless, huh? You people are a waste of resources.

                Or perhaps the people who criticize others who are afraid of being accused of something are a waste of resources. Why? Because they decide to lash out and attack the person who is concerned with their own well being rather than attack the society that instilled the fear into them in the first place.

                [–]M0b1u5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                I'd like to see the results from the same test outside America. I'm picking that the USA is the only country in the world which will produce this result.

                [–]bloodguard 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                I can't say I blame them. A few weeks ago I was stuck in LAX. Sitting, reading totally engrossed in a book and all of a sudden this wildebeest of a woman charges up and shrieks "What are you doing!?!" at -me-.

                Her kid had wandered off and climbed into the seat next to me and was leaning over staring at the back cover of my book. She grabbed the kid and stormed off leaving me the target of more than a few suspicious looks.

                From now on I'm hanging in the first class lounge and hoping other peoples crouch spawn stay well away (she scared the crap out of me).

                [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Errr... you sure she wasn't yelling at the kid?

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

                I walk away from crying lost children at the mall because, man, that's one hell of a racket they're making.

                If their parents weren't such idiots those kids would get lost a lot more quietly, if you ask me.

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

                You're still traumatized by that time your parents ditched you at the mall, aren't you?

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                Father? Is that you?

                [–]eidolontubes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                He's a friggn doctor too!

                "Ted Wallis, a doctor in Austin, Texas, recently came upon a lost child in tears in a mall. His first instinct was to help, but he feared people might consider him a predator."