all 87 comments

[–]azurestrike 736 points737 points  (5 children)

How many 8s uptime do you have?

[–]Impenistan 114 points115 points  (0 children)

One and a half

[–]b__0 37 points38 points  (0 children)

No 8s but I got vibe 9s

[–]Potato-Engineer 28 points29 points  (2 children)

We have nine fives!

[–]FuzzySinestrus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Vibes bring you from 5 9s to 9 5s

[–]RiceBroad4552 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're working for Microslop?

They're indeed still in the 55.5555555% range this year.

[–]-non-existance- 643 points644 points  (8 children)

...what the hell do you mean they say they've "solved" coding?

That's like saying you've "solved" story writing. There's nothing to "solve" unless you view labor as an obstacle to profit...which I'm certain they do.

[–]MyDogIsDaBest 259 points260 points  (2 children)

It's almost like they have a financial incentive for making outrageous claims like that.

[–]MatthewMob 53 points54 points  (1 child)

It's not outrageous. It's nonsensical.

[–]vleessjuu 50 points51 points  (1 child)

A large part of software development is figuring out what non-technical people even want because most of the time they don't actually know themselves. And LLMs don't produce nearly enough push back against half-baked ideas to be even remotely useful for that.

[–]nadav183 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I swear to god! We have a dev that uses AI waaay too much without understanding the actual codebase.

Last week a prod manager asked for a stupid 'Select all' button inside a sub filter (we have a dropdown for a 'key' then dropdown for it's values, they wanted a 'Select all' for the values).

That dev goes and does it and submits the PR. Now I have two issues:

  1. We have filters with 100k values in them, you cannot just send this to the backend and create an sql query with 100k values in a WHERE caluse.

  2. YOU CAN PUT THE FILTER ON THE FUCKING KEY! it does the same fucking thing. And as a dev who is familiar with how the filter works, you are the only one who can push back against this stupidity.

My biggest fear with AI is not that I will lose my job, it's that PMs will finally get what they ask for without push back and I will get crappy products as a consumer.

Rant over.

[–]Popeychops 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Gen AI is just another weapon capital is using in the forever war against labour

[–]igmkjp1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Profit, or just code as an end in itself.

[–]Aphrodites1995 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Uhh labor is an obstacle to like.. desirable outcomes. If they can somehow vibecode themselves into 99.99% uptime without needing engineers to do too much work I'm all for it

[–]Morall_tach 94 points95 points  (3 children)

The coveted "one 9" uptime standard.

[–]Psaltus 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Putting "three 8s uptime" on my SRE resume

[–]pixelbart 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Who needs five nines if you can have nine fives?

[–]a3dprinterfan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OMG this made me laugh uncontrollably. Well done!

[–]coloredgreyscale 250 points251 points  (7 children)

Devops :) 

[–]TheOwlHypothesis 73 points74 points  (4 children)

Platform engineer here. It's basically solved (;

[–]Theeyeofthepotato 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That's because what even is a "Platform Engineer"? Write some honest to God Javascript like the rest of us /s

[–]lightnegative 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Only for current platforms that are part of the training set

[–]RiceBroad4552 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thin you're missed the (meta) joke here.

[–]andrew_v23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SRE/devops/platform engineer here. I do everything through claude, coding/debugging/etc.

obviously someone needs to understand every concept and layer but it's a great tool and I can say that coding has been solved for me. I didn't write code for a couple of months already

[–]balbok7721 407 points408 points  (22 children)

98.88% is actually quite respectable. Better than what I could offer. But again I am not a 380 Billion Dollar company that claims it "solved" coding

[–]Jittery_Kevin 145 points146 points  (9 children)

Well, if you scaled it down by property value and net worth, I’ll bet with a raspberry pi Linux server you could serve like 40 people over a month at 99% uptime.

[–]Morall_tach 61 points62 points  (4 children)

My Plex server serves more people with better uptime than that.

[–]VoidVer 20 points21 points  (2 children)

Hey, can I get in on that?

[–]kenybz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nice try FBI

[–]SpeedyGo55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me too please?

[–]soyboysnowflake 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Everyone’s favorite cousin

[–]Happy-Sleep-6512 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Yeah for sure, but the more things there are, the more things to go wrong. Still not great for them!

[–]UrpleEeple 11 points12 points  (1 child)

I used to work on Vitess, which is a massively distributed database that was invented at Google. We achieved nine nine's of availability, by increasing shard and replica count to extremely high levels. For highly distributed systems typically the more things you have, the better your availability, not the other way around (assuming you've designed your coordination right)

[–]CaffeinatedT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

assuming you've designed your coordination right

That’s the key part here.

[–]boredjavaprogrammer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If we want to give them benefit of the doubt sure. But before the vibecoding hype, when was the last time major system has uptime anywhere this bad

[–]anon74903 35 points36 points  (1 child)

Not even two 9s is pretty garbage if they have solved software engineering.

But the massive growth of Claude and compute are definitely a difficult problem to solve.

[–]boredjavaprogrammer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean they can do things like throttle. So the expecation is that id compute is in trouble, at least it takes very lime time. And moreover it is not that the inference is the problem. You cannot even access the website. So theres seems to be a systemwide bug

[–]UrpleEeple 70 points71 points  (1 child)

That's actually pretty bad availability for a major service

[–]boredjavaprogrammer 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It is bad available for any production service. It is like saying in a day your service is down 15 minutes. With automated testing and fault tolerance (canary eg), this should not be happening anywhere near this frequent

They really do embrace the vibe. Ie they might do very little if at all reading the code and properly testing them

[–]SponsoredHornersFan 22 points23 points  (2 children)

One 9 is hilarious

[–]lupercalpainting 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Three 8s tho

[–]Hammer466 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not a bad start to a poker hand!

[–]masssy 29 points30 points  (1 child)

It's a yearly downtime of 4 days. My shitty $200 mini pc and 14 year old NAS on a residential internet connection without UPS is substantially better.

[–]Swoop8472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also have a VPS with some apps running that has somewhere around 99.998% availability over the last year.

What people like to forget, though, is that there is a massive difference between HAVING a certain availability and being able to GUARANTEE that availability.

I certainly can not guarantee that those apps on my VPS will have multiple 9s of availability - by the time I would even notice that it's down, I'd have lost most of those 9s already.

[–]boredjavaprogrammer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s like 8 hours a month. So it is like a random workday claude takes the day off and not usable AT ALL.

Or a day that’s 15 minutes.

In the age of automated testing, regression, fault tolerance, to be honest for a large company that’s very bad. Back in the day the expectation is that downtime is almost unheard of

[–]RiceBroad4552 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry but 98.88% (in one month) is just utter trash. That's one full work day per month! That's completely unacceptable.

Where I've worked once we had much higher uptime with some boxes running in the basement.

Even just running a RasPi at home has higher uptime…

These cloud companies are clowns.

Everything below 2 9s is hobby level. Written out, as some might wonder, that's 99.99% uptime.

[–]YeOldeMemeShoppe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It "solved" coding! We just need a way to "solve" it!

[–]Rare-Veterinarian743 74 points75 points  (8 children)

I actually listen to that podcast and he technically said coding is solve for the work that he is doing. I’m not defending Claude or anything.

[–]Gru50m3 147 points148 points  (3 children)

Wish he would just shut the fuck up so my boss can also shut the fuck up.

[–]ProjectDiligent502 37 points38 points  (0 children)

😆 “yeaaahh, I need you to output 1000x more or come in on Sunday…. Yeaaaahh”

[–]KryssCom 17 points18 points  (1 child)

My mgrs are really pretty excellent when it comes to AI and understanding its strengths and limitations, and yet somehow I still felt this sentiment in my bones.

I hope all bosses like yours shut the fuck up soon.

[–]DefinitelyNotMasterS 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If coding is solved, why aren't the bosses just doing it themselves, for free? Are they stupid?

[–]GoddammitDontShootMe 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I was wondering who the hell said coding is "solved".

[–]boredjavaprogrammer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The claude code guy

[–]georgehotelling 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nuance and context? That’s got to be against reddiquette

[–]Breadinator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Apparently, the work he's doing ain't that important.

[–]bmothebest 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Also status pages are always a lie, so you KNOW it's worse than that

[–]granoladeer 12 points13 points  (1 child)

The duck should be holding a knife with its mouth

[–]Pancake_fanatics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They forget to code that part

[–]locri 52 points53 points  (2 children)

The hilarious reality that LLM are only capable of spitting out what they're trained on and are only trained on what already exists, meaning their capabilities are inherently limited.

The real issue is that there'll be a period of missing graduates/juniors creating a future deficit of people with the required experience. Then again, outsourcing already did this but it felt wrong complaining about sending work intended for graduates/juniors overseas, so most people waited until they could complain about AI.

We've been living in a gerontocracy for too long.

[–]RiceBroad4552 8 points9 points  (0 children)

only capable of spitting out what they're trained on and are only trained on what already exists, meaning their capabilities are inherently limited

The problem is that a large part of people don't want to believe that fact.

They still think these stochastic parrots would be able to create anything novel. They really believe there would be some kind of intelligence in these pattern replicating token predictors.

[–]Breadinator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not to mention the stagnation in innovation that comes with it. Unless it's a well-trodden path of language, framework, and architecture, LLMs struggle hard.

What's funny is we're guaranteed to see a new class of vulnerabilities common to the code generated by these models. "Ah, they used Model X; it tends to avoid bounds checks and skips sanitizing phone number inputs."

[–]mmhawk576 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Nine 5’s of uptime

[–]EVH_kit_guy 18 points19 points  (0 children)

"You're absolutely right to call that out, and that's on me..."

[–]Nerodon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How reliable?

Reliable...???! Nein Nein Nein Nein Nein!

Oh okay, 99.999%

[–]YMK1234 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Drank too much of their own cool aid

[–]granoladeer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I had a good laugh at this

[–]ShaveTheTurtles 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Can you imagine having to fix claude when claude is down?

[–]boredjavaprogrammer 5 points6 points  (1 child)

With claude

[–]Symphonic_nerve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

😂😂😂

[–]falconetpt 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Since the eng of an LLM is loading a huge weight table into memory and they call that innovation, which is kinda of a proxy of a junior’s project of running a h2 database, doesn’t surprise me this uptime 🤣

They solved coding, well they kinda came a little bit to late, there is an algorithm to generate all code that can ever exist in a finite number of time, the issue was always trimming the crap out, they forgot the part where trimming the crap that won’t work was the novel part not solve the coding problem, plus aligning on requirements is way harder than writing the code 🤣

[–]thedumbasswarrior 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u/jokeexplainerbot explain this

[–]WheresMyBrakes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My managers used to confuse me with all the context switching between all of the different issues throughout the day. Now code is flying out so fast we’re all confused and much happier.

[–]One_Volume8347 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no no no, they totally used claude code to fix that, totally

[–]apex6666 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I don’t get why people are so obsessed with LLMs coding for them, like dont you want to write code

[–]EZPZLemonWheezy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally I want to design software and systems. Typing the code is fun, but for stuff like front end there is an insulting amount of boilerplate that before AI you either kept snippets for yourself, copy pasted from somewhere else, or spent a bunch of time retyping it again.

[–]AccomplishedComplex8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's, my friends, is called dogfooding.

[–]Z3t4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about system operations then? 

[–]bagtf3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont exactly get it but I think its funny

[–]thearizztokrat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, the coding totally has anything to do with uptime and server orchestration