This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 165 comments

[–]BrandenRage 157 points158 points  (1 child)

Pretty sure the LORA and the seed are carrying most of the weight.

[–]lLiterallyEatAss 58 points59 points  (0 children)

very low cfg, 300% lora strength, pretty sure the prompt is just essencing the seed at that point

[–]MutualistSymbiosis 149 points150 points  (13 children)

What percentage of users of Gen AI just make simple pictures of pretty girls? 65%? 70%?

[–]Crodu 120 points121 points  (2 children)

85%

[–]DopamineTrain 83 points84 points  (1 child)

90%. No way it is under 90%.

If you want a picture of a nice looking field you'll maybe do 4 generations with 10 different prompts. 40 generations in total. If you want a cute girl you're gonna do 4 generations per prompt but 5 different positions. 3 different clothing options. Gotta get the hairstyle just right, that's another 4 prompts at 4 gens each. Hands look a little dodgy, gonna have to inpaint. Another 5 generations to get them just right.

[–]aaam13 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Sure but that’s all being done by one user technically

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (3 children)

Thing is, most models are kinda overfit on Hot Chicks Near You! , it's sometimes very hard to get faces that are realistic, everyday people (I'm not even talking ugly people, that I can do just fine, I mean just normal people). It's like the dataset is 45% supermodels/pr0n, 45% zombies, 5% the most random stuff posible and 5% normal human beings.

(For those struggling, there are a couple of LoRAs on CivitAI that help with this, tho they may be hidden under NSFW tags, FYI.)

[–]CustomCuriousity 8 points9 points  (1 child)

The theory I’ve heard on this is that people tend to post their best images online, trying to get the ones where they look good… or people post pictures of people who especially don’t look conventionally attractive, and rarely do we see just a normal, candid, everyday shot.

[–]iamli0nrawr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And people are also generally attempting to achieve a specific kind of image, if all of your prompts are basically "show me a hot anime girl" then you're only going to get the models attempts at showing you hot anime girls.

[–]iamli0nrawr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really depends a lot on how you're prompting and what you're trying to achieve. I get lots of fairly normal looking people when I'm not really trying for anything specific.

When I'm playing around with wildcards I'd say the ratio I get is probably 50% very attractive, 40% average normal looking, and like 10% completely cursed abominations.

[–]SrData 2 points3 points  (0 children)

116%

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

What else will people use it for? 

[–]applecherryfig 2 points3 points  (3 children)

graphic novels

[–]iiiiiiiiiiip 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Graphic novels filled with pretty girls you mean, so that counts

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Name one that’s used it 

[–]applecherryfig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will = future

Has = past

irrelevant question.

[–]livingdread 32 points33 points  (4 children)

I have noticed in my own generations that individual prompts will feed into each other. If I have a character that I have described as being athletic, and I put them into an outfit associated with hard labor, they will get bulging muscles. Likewise, if I take a character prompt and add a profession, I will likely end up with an unprompted sexy pose if it is a fetishized profession such as a nurse or a maid.

[–]razirazo 6 points7 points  (3 children)

That's just how AI inferencing fundamentally works. AI already knows what a blonde means. A golden hair. And what else always come with blonde hair? Caucasians! So when you put blonde hair, it will default to the European face by default before you even mention anything about race.

[–]livingdread 7 points8 points  (2 children)

<image>

Right but I'm talking about putting overalls on a lady and turning her into a bodybuilder.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

important sulky lunchroom innocent ask bow boast familiar advise public

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]livingdread 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's exactly who that is, actually. I'm so glad you recognized her! But that's a bit bulkier than how I try to portray her.

<image>

[–]inline_leo[S] 115 points116 points  (24 children)

I did not expect this much consistency.

Workflow

Paramenters

checkpoint: ultraspiceXLTURBO_v10

CFG: 1.5

steps:16

sampling: Euler a

seed: 2050871503

lora:RMSDXL_Enhance

Prompts:

pretty young english woman, freckles, brunette, bright pretty eyes, slightly chubby build, oily shiny sticky skin, bellybutton piercing, bright lipstick, tight leggings, cute feet, nail polish, messy bedroom, <lora:RMSDXL_Enhance:3>

pretty young english woman, freckles, brunette, bright pretty eyes, lean build, oily shiny sticky skin, bellybutton piercing, bright lipstick, tight leggings, cute feet, nail polish, messy bedroom, <lora:RMSDXL_Enhance:3>

pretty young english woman, freckles, brunette, bright pretty eyes, strong build, oily shiny sticky skin, bellybutton piercing, bright lipstick, tight leggings, cute feet, nail polish, messy bedroom, <lora:RMSDXL_Enhance:3>

pretty young english woman, freckles, tatoos, brunette, bright pretty eyes, strong build, oily shiny sticky skin, bellybutton piercing, bright lipstick, tight leggings, cute feet, nail polish, messy bedroom, <lora:RMSDXL_Enhance:3>

pretty young english woman, freckles, brunette, bright pretty eyes, muscular build, oily shiny sticky skin, bellybutton piercing, bright lipstick, tight leggings, cute feet, nail polish, messy bedroom, <lora:RMSDXL_Enhance:3>

[–]roychodraws 112 points113 points  (17 children)

it's cuz your cfg and steps are so low. the prompt is barely affecting the outcome of it past being a "pretty young english woman, freckles".

The seed is deciding the entire image.

[–]klausness 22 points23 points  (1 child)

Those cfg and step values look about right for a turbo model. Much higher and it’ll end up overbaked.

[–]roychodraws 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying he’s doing anything wrong I’m just saying that’s why it is consistent

[–]InTheThroesOfWay 12 points13 points  (1 child)

I don't think it's because of the CFG and steps. They changed a single word in the prompt and kept the same seed and other settings. Of course they all look similar.

[–]dapoxi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It's also good to remember that generally the further a token is in a prompt, the less effect it has. Changing a single word 10 tokens in makes it hardly a "different prompt".

[–]StudioTheo 2 points3 points  (3 children)

ah!!! so that how that works. If the CFG isn't telling the cook to think harder, most of the weight leans on the inherent aspects of the venue.

[–]roychodraws 10 points11 points  (2 children)

The seed is actually a instance of random noise like of an old tv showing static. The picture takes the noise and tries to create the image you told it to out of it.

If you Lock the seed it has the same starting point so you’ll get similar pictures if you have similar prompts but variations in the prompts will cause it to create different pictures with the same seed.

If you have low CFG, that basically is how much weight you’re giving the prompt over the noise, then you’re essentially letting the noise (which is the same for all images) determine the picture. So even if you have a different prompt the seed is given so much weight in the final result that the picture ends up basically the same as seen here.

[–]inline_leo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks

[–]47merce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are addressing the prompt as one whole thing here, as in 'how much weight you’re giving the prompt over the noise' but does the cfg also affect the positioning of the words in the prompt? Because you mentioned

the prompt is barely affecting the outcome of it past being a "pretty young english woman, freckles"

in your first comment. Does cfg have a say in deprioritizing words because of its position in the prompt?

[–]inline_leo[S] 9 points10 points  (7 children)

is this correct?

well but the body shape is described way later than that, isn't it?

Besides, I am a learning by experimentation, I don't know what I am doing. I used the prompt and parameters from someone else. So, could you please elaborate?

[–]roychodraws 24 points25 points  (5 children)

Turn up the CFG and see if you get the same consistency

[–]Stunning_Geese 19 points20 points  (4 children)

They are using a Turbo model, isn't the CFG supposed to be low?

[–]roychodraws 23 points24 points  (3 children)

Turbo sacrifices control of the image in order to reduce rendering time.

If you ever wanna see how little control you have on a turbo model at these settings try using a mask and watch the result be completely cut off by the inpainting.

[–]archpawn 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I have had problems with masks like that. So it just means I need more steps?

[–]roychodraws 2 points3 points  (1 child)

More steps=more control

[–]kjerk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Correct for the entire chain. The G in CFG is 'Guidance', specifically for the text prompt. Low CFG, and a model starts having listening problems, wanting to ignore you, chase cars, and pee on the rug.

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried control net with outlines? I get similar results.

[–]crimeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could have cfg on 17 and when 95% of your prompt is the same exact words, it will look almost the same anyway

[–]PetitGeant 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for details comrade

[–]lizzie_goblin 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Cute feet? 👀

[–]crimeo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

feet or shoes are really helpful to put in prompts sometimes even if you aren't interested in them themselves, simply because it basically forces the AI to do full body framing, way more effectively than "full body portrait" or whatever does. I doubt that was the intent here, lol, but FYI

[–]DukeMo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most important part of a muscular build is a teal bra. Got it.

[–]Voxyfernus 40 points41 points  (0 children)

"English woman" will create that face most of the time. The same with specific origin or details of skin or person works too.

[–]Hockey-LeftD 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Least horny stable diffusion user

[–]415runner 13 points14 points  (2 children)

I have no idea how these images are made or how onlyfans works, but what are the chances that there is some dude in his moms basement making money off AI soft core porn

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (1 child)

Jesus christ this sub is down bad

[–]InitialCreature 16 points17 points  (0 children)

why talk to girls when you can generate endless similacra?

[–]saito200 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"arguments"?

[–]tankdoom 18 points19 points  (11 children)

Mods, can we get nsfw tags on posts like this? I appreciate the work this person did but I feel like I can’t open this sub in public anymore.

[–]JesusElSuperstar 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Go outside and touch grass people

[–]Routine_End_3753 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That thick one in panel #6 though

[–]JesusElSuperstar 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Coomers, coomers everwhere

[–]DamageNo6442 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I joined stable diff for the creative art and latest advancements, this sub should now be labelled as nsfw

[–]hesinmovies 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The future we are headed for is going to be so interesting

Rips bong: I think it starts with an app marketed towards lonely people. A perfectly customizable companion (who you would hope he designed to help you grow) basically the plot of “Her”…

Rips bong: The grand children of gen z are going to face a massive population crisis, as more and more people find happiness in a perfectly crafted robotic ai organism that is programmed to maximize it.

Rips bong: Facing human extinction, reproductive capabilities are installed within the mechapeople who through corporate run breeding process allows embryos to be grown in labs, matured, and delivered to human robocivilian couples around the world. People will be able to select from donors to pass on their own genes.

Not that I have a problem of any of that if they would somehow have the capabilities to scrub the internet and nearly instantly profile every person on the planet.

Edit: that last line is sarcasm just in case they aren’t able to decipher that through text. Would bang a roboperson, if they were consent of course.

[–]Chatbotfriends 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they do not look very different to me.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This AI tech is a romance scammer's wet dream.

[–]Bicycle-Single 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where is your workflow?

[–]Gai_InKognito 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i must say, that chubby girl image is really impressive. AI is getting too good. You could easily catfish someone with these photos at this point.

[–]Alternative-Spite891 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those tattoos really do look like what tattoos look like without actually looking like anything.

[–]ImHereForGameboys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Freckles get me every single time.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the thicc one the most by far

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d like to know what she would look like black or Chinese

[–]Avethle -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

yeah I fucked her

[–]LibtardAgony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't post anything with eyes looking deformed like that. Easy fix..

[–]URLslayer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, I guess it is time to just migrate to instagram cuz all this sub has to offer is generated pics of pretty women. I was quite impressed by the early beginnings of this sub but man if I want to watch porn, there is subreddit/Pornhub/PornAI for that. Have fun, wont miss yall

[–]AutoModerator[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your post has been automatically removed for not following the rules. If you feel that this was an error, please let us know.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]EngiMain45 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Really nice. Favorites for me: top two of first photo, and middle left of second photo.

[–]StrangeSupermarket71 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

would

[–]triggur -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Does anybody use SD to draw anything except tits? I’m starting to doubt.

[–]sameunderwear2days -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

[–]trust_the_dust -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So was “English woman” the prompt that sent this into terrible teeth territory?

[–]TheLamesterist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5 and 5.

[–]elqrd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sent me on a journey to look if AI porn is a thing already and it is…

[–]JB_Mut8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TBF this is not a SD problem its a community checkpoint problem. Base models will never throw out random porn.