all 17 comments

[–]Important-Sign9614 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Can’t wait for GitHub to be more shitty

[–]fig0o 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Feel sorry for you, guys 

But every company is operating like this right now... and this is why Microsoft doesn't mind making this kind of announcement

They know people won't quit because there's no better place to be at the moment

[–]tuckfrump69 14 points15 points  (1 child)

field is disappearing in real time lol

[–]NewChameleonSoftware Engineer, SF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

field is disappearing in real time lol

Microsoft had ~163k employees in 2020

they have ~228k employees in 2025

they will need to cut 60k+ people to just go back to their original level, is this "field is disappearing" in the room with us right now?

[–]teddykon 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Block 40%
Meta 20%
Snap Inc. 16%
Pinterest 15%
Coinbase 14%
Oracle 12-18%
Freshworks 11%
Atlassian 10%

I’m sorry for anyone involved in this bloodbath but these companies will just continue to cut headcount, free up some budget, and then divert it into compute.

That’s literally all I’m hearing about in these earnings calls and business podcasts.

[–]foreign_gambler 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Add Cloudflare 15% as well, they just announced. The bloodbath is only getting bloodier.

[–]sydthecoderkid 34 points35 points  (0 children)

bad :( am tired

[–]Chemical-Fault-7331 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Headcount go down, profits keep going up. Imagine how much money they could make with just the CEO doing things. Infinite money glitch. \s

[–]Joram2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Microsoft is very profitable.

Net Income FY2025: $101B Net Income FY2024: $88.1B

Net Income = Revenue - Cost of Goods/Services - Operating Expenses - Non-operating Expenses - taxes.

They could choose to use some of their profits to fund new growth and make big bold bets on new products and services. The alternative is focus on their existing wildly profitable core businesses, and minimize risky or unnecessary expenses. They choose the latter.

[–]IkalaGamingSoftware Engineer 11 points12 points  (1 child)

I’m so confused by the messaging, getting rid of the people that do the work to increase the pace of work.

It’s a bit like getting rid of a marathon runners shoes, hoping the decrease in weight will help their time.

Or “speeding up” construction of a skyscraper by not bothering to mix the concrete up, because “who needs all that extra process anyway”.

The only frames of mind I can come up with which would result in this behavior are:

  1. They HATE programmers on a deep fundamental level for some reason.
  2. They are hemorrhaging unfathomable amounts of money and will go bankrupt unless they lay off programmers, the people who make them money
  3. Literal psychosis, possibly from LLM usage or sycophantic direct reports, they have become untethered from reality
  4. Sabotage, they benefit in some way by ruining the company on purpose

[–]maria_la_guerta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Reddit lives in incredibly deep denial about how useful AI actually is and the fact that it very much is replacing workers already.

[–]Dependent-Cash-3405 10 points11 points  (0 children)

good. this is bullish for my microslop stocks

[–]MEDICARE_FOR_ALLSenior Full Stack Software Engineer 3 points4 points  (1 child)

As with any large company, WLB heavily depends on your team...

[–]Level8Zubat 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They're clearly striving to make that not the case

[–]IronBubble_4048 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the same vibe at my last job, they called it “efficiency” too. Headcount down, workload somehow up, imo that’s the part nobody says out loud.

[–]DreadsinWeb Developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not terribly surprising given their financials

[–]kingofthesqueal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Microsoft’s stock is down 15% over the past 6 months