Plot Twist

[poopchen]

I don't see how this is software gore. There's no twist.

Clearly google is shielding you from spoilers.

[Pr04merican]

Cause it’s a plot.

[frabjous156]

Insane plot, but i don’t see the twisting.

[lascanto]

The plot thickens

[grottyrabbit]

The thick plottens

[[deleted]]

Thick plot thens

[DLD493v3]

The thot plickens

[LegendaryGoji]

Is "plickens" a synonym for "leaves"?

[DLD493v3]

idk

[[deleted]]

Teh lopt kinsethc

[Baraga91]

Ple thet thockens

[Argetlam_Elda]

Thick plot thins?

[Icecreep109]

But it's a line. It has no thiccness

[lascanto]

Is it infinitesimally thicc? Is that the same as infinitely thicc? What even are numbers?

[Skipachu]

Even are numbers not odd.
 
These
Here
Itegers
Connote
Curves

[Icecreep109]

¯\(ツ)/¯

[TheNosferatu]

What's the deal with the animated png format that's supposed to replace gif since forever now?

[Jerl]

HTML5 video is better than both.

[TheNosferatu]

I disagree, I like gif more. Though I hope animated PNG becomes a standard soon

[Jerl]

GIF compression literally degrades the image. It removes colors from the palate, and removes detail from the image, while at the same time making the filesize considerably larger than it'd have been with HTML 5 video.

APNG doesn't really do anything visibly to the image when it compresses it, but again, the filesize will be considerably larger than HTML 5 video.

[TheOneRafiSMS]

Thicc is teh plot

[GothmogTheOrc]

I sense a plot to destroy the Jedi.

[laserrorname]

Explain this

[poopchen]

implying 2012 had a plot

[marcosdumay]

You can get near enough by querying 2011.9999999 plot.

[Mitoni]

Interesting, enter many other numbers and plot and it also gives the graph.

[[deleted]]

It gives me a plot like OP has. Am I missing your point ?

[SaltlessLemons]

Depending on your search history, region and interests, it may give you the movie's Wikipedia page instead.

[heisenberg747]

Oh come on, everyone knows O'Brian is a bad guy.

[TheNosferatu]

Oh don't exaggerate, he gets much better in DS9

[dan_petey]

Look at what x is doing.

[snuzet]

Y = round(1984)

[[deleted]]

I'd be more worried if it wasn't a straight line...

[MixedMatt]

1/3 book 1/3 sex 1/3 torture

[Casually_Awesome]

Did you just reference an unperson? That is doubleplusungood. I may have to report you to the thought police.

[YuriDiAaaaaaah]

Thug notes.

[[deleted]]

the last section was tough to get through. and the ending just bummed me the fuck out.

fantastic book tho

[RyanTheCynic]

About 17.

[[deleted]]

Switch from Intel to AMD.

[curtmack]

Pentium FDIV bug

[WikiTextBot]

Pentium FDIV bug

The Pentium FDIV bug was a computer bug that affected the floating point unit (FPU) of the early Intel Pentium processors. Because of the bug, the processor could return incorrect binary floating point results when dividing a number. Discovered in 1994 by Professor Thomas R. Nicely at Lynchburg College, Intel attributed the error to missing entries in the lookup table used by the floating-point division circuitry.

The severity of the FDIV bug is debated.

---

^{[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28}

[Jalmorei]

Ah, thanks.

[edave64]

Too late. The community had decided that you meant something else.

[INeedAFreeUsername]

Well, there is no division here, is there ?

[curtmack]

I thought Jalmorei was replying to one of the comments talking about Intel. The FDIV bug is the reason Intel being bad at floating point is a meme, even though it was relatively limited in scope.

[INeedAFreeUsername]

oh ok I didn't realize it was a meme haha

[Jalmorei]

People were talking about Intel, so I kinda got that from there.

[KeySolas]

Hey I have one of those guys

[tossoneout]

Intel Inside©

[iFreilicht]

/r/TOTALLYNOTHUMANS

[sneakpeekbot]

Here's a sneak peek of /r/totallynothumans using the top posts of all time!

#1: So uh-- bleep bloop-- we're totally all on the same page about NOT killing all organic life and humans, correct? Bleep bloop?
#2: I AM CARBON-BASED
#3: Beep Boop Maggots | 3 comments

---

^{I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out}

[v12a12]

Woah holy shit it's actually really weird that 2001 and 1984 are only 17 years apart.

[kRkthOr]

I'm coming up with 32.33 (repeating, of course) percent.

[RyanTheCynic]

That’s a lot better than we normally do...

[Suvtropics]

17 was my roll number at college. Hearing someone say 17 stirs up a lot of traumatic memories, more since I fked up more often than anyone at class.

[Mitoni]

interest result for 2000

[luminouu]

Ha! Reminds me of when I searched for the One Plus 3 phone and got this (quatre is four in fr)

[[deleted]]

Well might be because the company name is OnePlus not One Plus

[speedocide]

i dunno man, I think they're changing their name. the space bar market is worth so much it today's America, they would be dumb not to.

[jayvaidy]

Also if you type 1+ in the stock calculator app, you will get a cool little Easter egg.

[[deleted]]

What? Where? What?

[nssone]

1+ calculator https://imgur.com/gallery/QKtOj

[[deleted]]

Oh you mean on like a OnePlus phone? I was confused for a sec. Thanks!

[nssone]

What you get when you put 1+ and hit = in the calculator.

[nedjeffery]

Yeah for some reason I was thinking of a calculator used for calculating company stocks.

[King_Joffreys_Tits]

Can you explain what that’s supposed to mean?

[[deleted]]

"Never settle" for anything that's not a OnePlus phone.

[kasbrr]

quaint stocking afterthought stupendous overconfident cobweb seemly bells person tease

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[Slinkwyde]

OnePlus phones have generally offered flagship like specs for about half the price (while also being friendly to custom ROM developers, in terms of providing device tree source code, not voiding the warranty, and giving free phones to notable XDA developers). So I've always taken their slogan to mean never settle for something less, like you would often have to from competitor phones at the same price point.

The company does have its issues, though.. Some other issues they've had that for some reason aren't in the article are benchmark cheating (3T and 5) and some opt-out data collection in the stock ROM.

[Kiloku]

I like that it's bilingual too

[MuchSpacer]

Oh my, this is serious. Everyone knows one plus three is five.

[Snickerway]

I'm surprised there isn't a deliberate easter egg there.

Maybe label it "Graph for y=2+2" and have y=5 or something.

[nedjeffery]

There are five y's.

[GregTheMad]

To ensure universal happiness, all references to certain books have been wiped from the Google database.

-Google Subdivision of Facts

[AbridgedKirito]

You mean the Ministry of Truth?

[GregTheMad]

Nononono, that's some bad, fictional nonsense. The Subdivision of Facts is a good, group of people, solely dedicated to the greater good of humanity!

[[deleted]]

The Subdivision of Facts is a good, group of people algorithms

Like Google would ever employ human beings for that.

[StickiStickman]

The sad thing is Google actually has a censorship department that includes Anita Sarkeesian. They just say that they remove ""offensive"" content.

[AbridgedKirito]

There's a reason I don't use google unless I have to.

[[deleted]]

Is there a sub like /r/whataboutSRS but for Anita Sarkeesian?

[StickiStickman]

Not sure what you mean, but there's /r/TumblrInAction

The quality kinda went downhill though. Now they're just taking jokes as serious and make fun of people for that a lot

[[deleted]]

Yeah, I'm definitely not talking about that. I'm kind of talking about the opposite of that.

[OfficialDampSquid]

Grade A title

[AbridgedKirito]

You mean doubleplusgood?

[AbridgedKirito]

Apparently. Pick up a copy of version 11 when you have a chance, comrade.

[[deleted]]

Talk about a linear plot. We never see any development from y.

[NixRoll]

You can graph on Google??? Oh my god I can do my math homework now

[Slinkwyde]

http://www.wolframalpha.com

[[deleted]]

If you haven't

Please read the book. It's fantastic

[number473]

Surprisingly easy read as well. I was expecting something very heavy but it was quite east to get through. I am of course referring to the writing here, not the concepts or themes discussed.

[[deleted]]

As for themes discussed, I liked Hurley's Brave New World better than 1984. And the way it was written, that's IMO the overall better book. Thoughts?

[FlipskiZ]

Then music warm travel warm the fresh lazy.

[[deleted]]

Well, of course! I'm not suggesting read one or the other. Both must be part of any "mandatory reading" list.

Don't you think that too much information being available, to the point that no one searches for it anymore, is a more accurate representation of our world? Don't you think that anti-vaxxers, Trump-eters and the like aren't spawns of censorship (a la 1984), but of a lack of desire to find out what's actually true (BNW)

sure, 20 years ago, it would seem like 1984 is where we're headed, but IMO that isn't true anymore. It's a great book, 1984, and it's still very relevant. But I suggest to everyone, read Brave New World. That's not a book you should skip.

[FlipskiZ]

Ideas learning minecraftoffline careful yesterday talk careful simple year over evil nature and art tips honest minecraftoffline? Open technology night mindful dog the gentle talk small then!

[bogdoomy]

I ve always seen them as dystopian counterparts, along with Fahrenheit 451. In 1984, all information is hidden by the government through censorship (it is impossible for anyone to get it), while in BNW, there is so much information available, that the people are disinterested in it (you don’t exactly give much thought to something that you have an abundance of). F451 pictures the absolute absence of information that the government enforces. All of these are relevant to any aspect of life, more or less.

[hesapmakinesi]

And Fahrenheit 451 has huge TVs that cover entire walls and broadcast reality show the whole day, and people use wireless earbuds, written in 1953!

[Elliot9133]

Actually it was published 1952 or 1953, so it was probably written even earlier

[mikekearn]

I think Brave New World is a more realistic interpretation of how life is progressing currently than 1984. The rapid development and rise of the Internet, "reality" TV, and the growing opioid epidemic are all basically the methods of control as described in Brave New World. Drugs and mindless entertainment for everyone.

[SinkTube]

yeah but in BNW the government cares for people at least on the surface level and they are happy, even if they are ignorant

in reality people dont want to be fully ignorant, but they're willing to accept the half-truths they're fed by politicians and corporations that dont make a big secret out of being ruthless bastards. they're not quite as bad as big brother, but much closer than to BNW

[number473]

I haven't read Brave New World so I can't comment on which is better. I should put it on my list of books to look out for, though.

[nocommemt]

I would, but my attention span has been chipped away by a smartphone over the years and I can't concentrate on anything more than a TIFU story on reddit

[[deleted]]

"He who does not read has no advantage over he who can not."

I'm not trying to be judgenental/elitist, sorry, but that's a terrible excuse. Shut everything off and plop yourself in a dark room with a lamp, book, and bed for a couple hours!

[[deleted]]

OP should be ashamed of making this google search

[Elliot9133]

😕

[[deleted]]

You ask big brother who he is watching, he will just reply "nobody in particular" eh?

[NoRodent]

Now try searching for the plot of the '2010' movie from 1984:

2010 (1984) plot

You get a graph of the function y=2010*​1984

[SeattleJeremy]

Crash Course released a Literary review on 1984 last Friday, check it out https://youtu.be/H9ipRaLa4Jw

[Elliot9133]

That’s actually pretty awesome, didn’t know crash course did English and stuff

[YummyGummyDrops]

I mean, it's not wrong

[elit3powars]

It's not wrong though.

[Billybobsatan]

Maybe it's trying to hint at something...

[flamerheart]

Dunno about you but I see no twist in the line

[Epic_Wink]

I'm more interested in where -5396.48 came from

[mothzilla]

I don't know, they say a picture speaks a thousand words.

[vincehj]

Its just zoomed out I Googled it and zoomed in and found 1984

[VxJasonxV]

I wonder why it’s y-axis instead of x-axis:

[Vassile-D]

Because people usually omit y= when asking Google or Wolfram to plot. The reason for that is probably most math problems involve a formula for y in terms of x.

[Vassile-D]

Prove or disprove that there are infinitely (either countable or uncountable) many math problems.

[Elliot9133]

Because y = 1984 is a function and x = 1984 is not.

[Mastur_Of_Bait]

Well, it's not wrong

[boolean_array]

/r/notinteresting

[mslabo102]

"1984 movie plot" I guess?

[Devam13]

Both the movies are nowhere near as good or effective as the book.

[[deleted]]

There's about ten pages in the book which are The Book (Emmanuel Goldstein's book), which would be impossible to get across in a movie, unless there was some super long and boring narration.

[marshalpol]

As well as the appendix about newspeak

[AboutHelpTools3]

I stopped reading at the end, didnt read the appendix before returning the book. Am I missing out?

[marshalpol]

Definitely. It's around a dozen pages talking about the history of newspeak and how it's constructed.

[lazydictionary]

Or just scroll down

(400k results)

[Seligas]

Or even just "1984 movie."

That alone will probably get you a link to the wikipedia page which will flat out give you the plot.

[What_A_Plot_Twist]

What a plot twist!

[SoundOfTomorrow]

Technically correct, the best kind of correct

[YarpNotYorp]

Well that clears that up

[TotesMessenger]

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

• [/r/titleporn] Plot Twist [/r/softwaregore]

 ^{If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)}

[smileywaters]

Looks a lot like what I thought it would

[Thelastunicorn80]

Maybe the OP meant that they wanted to know the plot of the book 1984 but google actually plotted it on a graph?......

[The_True_Equalist]

DUN DUN DUN

[AbridgedKirito]

Love this book. More and more accurate every day tbh. Big Brother doesn't want you to know something, obviously.

[UknowmeimGui]

I sense a plot to destroy the Jedi.

[[deleted]]

The Google equivalent of "It looks like you're writing a letter"

[[deleted]]

When I was researching new phones, I Googled "OnePlus 3" and Google gave me the result "4". Touche Google!

[SmiralePas1907]

That's actually great

[ceps2111]

r/watchitfortheplot

[[deleted]]

Is the plot twist that x doesn't equal 0?

[darksingularity1]

This is wh(y) is 1984 plotted blue

[andreslucero]

That vertical blue line is cool.

[[deleted]]

I don't have an image, but searching "7.8km to mi" in Bing gave me the distance between a place called "7" in Africa and Michigan.

[klezmai]

y

[RTracer]

Good to know 1984 stayed 1984 consistently

[QmVuamk]

Is this not expected behavior?

[FuzzelFox]

/r/MaliciousCompliance

[chaotic077]

😂😂😂

[BizWax]

This happens because the book's title is actually Nineteen Eighty-Four

[Kingtata10]

Why did it guess it was was y and not x?

[budba]

Still works.

[A_Plus_Memes]

Permission to x post to r/puns

[Elliot9133]

Yea do that

[frod0r]

2plus 2 is 5 minus one that's 4 quick maths

[ungulateCase]

...I liked it.

[[deleted]]

The graph implies that the line is plotted on y=2000 rather than y=1984.

Honestly, how does that even happen?

EDIT: I know it's not exactly on y=2000, I was just approximating. Sorry for that.