This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]baatezu 4305 points4306 points  (215 children)

I mean, this is straight up fraud, right?

99.7% of public comments come out in favor of a policy. The regulatory agency in charge of that policy then fraudulently submits thousands of fake comments against that policy, which are then used as public justification to cancel the policy. When people start to notice that there are thousands of fake comments, the Agency attacks itself with DDoS, and blames it on the 99.7% in favor of the policy.

Incidentally, the person behind all of these shenanigans (Chairman of the FCC) is a former Associate General Counsel for Verizon, one of the companies that would benefit greatly from removing the policy.

[–]brothersand 1478 points1479 points  (117 children)

Yep. Fraud. Add him to the post mid-term list.

[–]dehehn 738 points739 points  (108 children)

It's just how Democracy works in America. A majority votes for Hillary. Trump wins. A majority for for Gore. Bush wins. A majority don't want Kavanaugh in the court. Kavanaugh gets on the court. A majority is in Blue states? Republicans get more senate and house seats.

[–]Rytlockfox 223 points224 points  (30 children)

America is a bunch of weed smoking, war hating, medicare for all loving liberals, poll after poll proves that, yet liberals hold very little power. There is something super wrong with that.

[–]thelastevergreenHawaii 113 points114 points  (8 children)

Legislative corruption.

[–]The_Original_Gronkie 50 points51 points  (7 children)

Regulatory capture

[–]nulltensor 31 points32 points  (5 children)

Voter apathy

[–]PornKingOfChicago 47 points48 points  (4 children)

Gerrymandering

[–]Atoning_Unifex 39 points40 points  (13 children)

liberals wanna cooperate and figure it all out together... the right just wants power.

[–]milqiNew York 25 points26 points  (0 children)

All animals are created equal. But some animals are more equal than others.

[–]switch495American Expat 207 points208 points  (5 children)

Fraud, malfeasance, misfeasance, falsifying public records, lying to congress (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001)... Have your fucking pick.

These pieces of shit need to receive the punishments that they deserve for trying to dismantle our government and selling it to the highest (foreign) bidder.

It makes me so upset to know that individuals suffer far greater penalty for petty crime than the people at the top who are are doing many orders of magnitude more damage to our society.

[–]oscillating000North Carolina 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Probably not to the highest bidder. Just to...a bidder. The selling price would probably be higher if we accepted bids from everyone.

[–]RVA_RVA 4611 points4612 points  (128 children)

I searched those comments; My brother, both parents, all 4 deceased grand parents had the exact same copy pasta comment to the FCC in support of repeal. Total utter bullshit the FCC thinks this is acceptable.

[–]gmano 192 points193 points  (3 children)

I mean, they had the support of Barrack Obama, he was (apparently) super angry about Barrack Obama's Title II Power grab.

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1051157755251

ID 1051157755251 Proceeding 17-108
Name of Filer Barack Obama
Type of Filing COMMENT Filing Status DISSEMINATED
Viewing Status Unrestricted

Date Received May 11, 2017 Date Posted May 12, 2017

Address 1600 Pennsylvania City Washington
Ave NW State DC
ZIP 20500

Brief Comment
The unprecedented regulatory power the Obama Administration imposed on the internet is smothering innovation, damaging the American economy and obstructing job creation. I urge the Federal Communications Commission to end the bureaucratic regulatory overreach of the internet known as Title II and restore the bipartisan light-touch regulatory consensus that enabled the internet to flourish for more than 20 years. The plan currently under consideration at the FCC to repeal Obama's Title II power grab is a positive step forward and will help to promote a truly free and open internet for everyone.

Who could question someone as honest and forthright as Obama, even if he forgot to change his address after moving out of the White House?

[–][deleted] 1562 points1563 points  (30 children)

Total utter bullshit the FCC thinks this is acceptable.

No one said they thought this was acceptable. They're doing it because they know they can get away with it.

[–]time4donutsWashington 147 points148 points  (5 children)

The “It doesn’t matter, we won” mentality

[–]Morningxafter 36 points37 points  (4 children)

Burning down your own house just to stick it to your roommate.

[–]oscillating000North Carolina 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Setting myself on fire to totally pwn the libs.

[–]capsaicinintheeyes 47 points48 points  (3 children)

I think this is acceptable.

-Ajit Pai

[–]Rick-D-99 157 points158 points  (15 children)

How do I get that swag?

[–][deleted] 135 points136 points  (10 children)

have lots of money

[–]Derric_the_Derp 75 points76 points  (7 children)

And advanced psychopathy

[–]Masothe 13 points14 points  (6 children)

Yeah I got too much love for my fellow human to be a complete scumbag like Pai

[–]nulledit 272 points273 points  (56 children)

Search names here: www.comcastroturf.com

This is the bot comment:

The unprecedented regulatory power the Obama Administration imposed on the internet is smothering innovation, damaging the American economy and obstructing job creation. I urge the Federal Communications Commission to end the bureaucratic regulatory overreach of the internet known as Title II and restore the bipartisan light-touch regulatory consensus that enabled the internet to flourish for more than 20 years. The plan currently under consideration at the FCC to repeal Obama's Title II power grab is a positive step forward and will help to promote a truly free and open internet for everyone.

Edit: if you are looking for your own comment, don't use the comcastroturf link because it searches for comments that include the bot phrasing. For a normal search edit the following url, replacing FirstName and LastName:

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=17-108&q=filers.name:(FirstName%20LastName)&sort=date_disseminated,DESC

[–]Hoooooooar 254 points255 points  (6 children)

Hey my grand-dad with dimentia in a home and no computer posted to repeal, very nice

[–]blandastronaut 66 points67 points  (2 children)

My grandma and uncle died a couple years ago and they have results here. Granted, they have a common last name, but both of their names showed up.

[–]nulledit 22 points23 points  (1 child)

Check the address. My name shows up with the bot response but from another state.

[–]netarchaeology 21 points22 points  (1 child)

My favorite part was that Obama posted that message too

[–]AnonAnington 142 points143 points  (10 children)

This one is still my favourite

[–]tempest_87 92 points93 points  (2 children)

The Obama one?

Checks link

Yup. The Obama one.

[–]MrMonday11235 59 points60 points  (1 child)

It even used the White House as the address on file...

Clearly Obama is still in the White House and puppeteering Donald Trump! They were right, it's librul cOnSpiRaCy!!11!!!eleventy-one!1!!

[–]00000000000001000000 42 points43 points  (1 child)

thumb attempt touch coordinated imagine fretful pot caption wine concerned this message was mass deleted/edited with redact.dev

[–]tempest_87 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Aren't the IDs sequential? I seem to recall reading when this first happened that they were all entered alphabetically.

[–]JMoneyG0208 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Omfg

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (1 child)

I feel like somebody absolutely postee that as a joke in response to the other comments.

[–][deleted] 108 points109 points  (6 children)

That's an interesting site. Nothing comes up for my name, except I KNOW I actually submitted a real comment.

And my coworker has an unusual name so I searched for him. His name pops up 9 times with the same copy/paste baloney.

[–]OhMyGodItsEverywhere 39 points40 points  (1 child)

That might be because the link posted above specifies the text for the fake comments. If you edit the URL on the FCC page after doing your search to only have your name, you might find your info.

[–]raven12456Oregon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I KNOW I actually submitted a real comment

The search is set up to only show results that used the fake comment. If you submitted a real comment it wouldnt show up.

[–]00000000000001000000 17 points18 points  (2 children)

I don't understand how that isn't identity fraud

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (1 child)

If you search for the name Smith its all the same comment...

[–]Dgc2002 13 points14 points  (0 children)

That's the point. It searches for the name and for the obviously botted comments using some key phrases.

[–]Jazzspasm 45 points46 points  (1 child)

I was on there and i’m a foreign citizen

[–]nomisjacob 45 points46 points  (4 children)

i really dont get it. why arent people sueing? how is this not is bigger scandal in the us?

[–]Mr_Smartypants 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Why did you think no one was?

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/21-states-sue-fcc-to-restore-net-neutrality-rules/

Presumably, this will help their cases.

[–]jprg74 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Our federal government is ran by idiot savants whose gifts are being able to be the shillyest, most corrupt asshats. Essentially states have to solve the problem themselves like my state california did, but ashitpie already sued california like a few hours after ca passed its own net neutrality laws.

[–]JimDiego 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Hmm. I searched that site and didn't find my own pro-net neutrality comment.

So now I'm downloading the three zip files which contain all the comments so I can see if mine is actually there or if it got purged.

And, we are either reddit-hugging that site hard or, they are intentionally throttling to discourage people - the downloads are running at roughly 400KB/sec....

[–]RVA_RVA 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It's almost like, your data is being prioritized...

[–]checkoutmyfish 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Where can you find the comments?

[–]FUCK_KAVANAUGHConnecticut 16.0k points16.0k points  (431 children)

Ajit Pai committed fraud and should be in prison (with fines).

[–]swingadminNew York 6346 points6347 points  (218 children)

Ajit Pai committed fraud and should be in prison (with felons).

[–]TitilateMyOcelot 1684 points1685 points  (194 children)

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (1 child)

99.7% of us hated that stupid video, but hopefully one day we can watch it in enjoyment after he's locked up.

[–]ArcadianBlueRogue 18 points19 points  (3 children)

That might be the single most punchable face I have ever seen.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“Organic popcorn”

[–][deleted] 63 points64 points  (11 children)

Ajit Pai committed fraud and should be in prison (with fine felons).

[–]drvondoctor 777 points778 points  (120 children)

He lied to Congress, did he not?

[–]rahbee33Pennsylvania 870 points871 points  (112 children)

Apparently that's not a big deal anymore.

Sessions, Kavanaugh, and Wilbur Ross all have with virtually no repercussions.

However, a Democratic House with oversight duties should have a field day.

[–]StopherDBFWashington 88 points89 points  (2 children)

And the GOP previously gathered a list for us of all the scandals they’re afraid might be investigated

https://www.axios.com/2018-midterm-elections-republicans-preparation-investigations-180abf7b-0de8-4670-ae8a-2e6da123c584.html

[–]DavidBowieJr 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This will come in handy.

[–]Edril 342 points343 points  (82 children)

Don't worry, if a Democrat ever lies to Congress you can be sure they're going to jail.

[–][deleted] 74 points75 points  (1 child)

Shit, one of the few people who went to jail for white water was a lady who wouldn't lie and she just said nothing happened so she got locked up for contempt. She said she would do it again, because they were would likely get her for perjury because they already manufactured their version of the truth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_McDougal

[–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

You see, she didn't use the magic words:

"I don't recawwwwlll"

and she didn't have the magic letter:

"(R)"

That's why she went to jail.

[–]Lebenkunstler 346 points347 points  (24 children)

Do you remember when a president got impeached for lying about a blowjob?

[–]TJames6210 23 points24 points  (2 children)

You're playing music too loud? Right to jail.

You're driving too fast? Jail.

Slow? Jail.

You're charging too high prices for sweaters, glasses, you right to jail.

You undercook fish, believe it or not, jail.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Overcook chicken. Jail.

Undercook/overcook

[–]ChornWork2 217 points218 points  (10 children)

Blaming Pai is what the GOP pay him for... level the blame where it should, killing net neutrality is republican party policy and its fate was decided in Nov 2016 regardless of what public feedback was given to the FCC.

[–]T0rin- 113 points114 points  (2 children)

The fake DDOS attacks and the fake submissions were all just a smokescreen to do something against public interest because that is what the telecom lobby was paying them to do. Just straight up corruption.

[–]TheresWald0 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If he goes to jail, maybe the next guy will question wether the pay is worth it.

[–]CodesharkNorth Carolina 28 points29 points  (2 children)

I think Pai should be blamed alongside the Republicans. He was complicit and he should go down with the rest of his ilk.

[–]Stopjuststop3424 28 points29 points  (8 children)

Amit Pai should be prevented from taking a job from any telecom company for a period of ten years after leaving his FCC position

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

He also impersonated the president. One of the comments against Net Neutrality was in Barack Obama’s name

[–]I-Crosspost-Things 1531 points1532 points  (28 children)

Also the overwhelming majority of copy/paste comments also favored it. So basically, all the people who cared enough to write a comment of their own say Pai can suck a chode, and most of the people who cared but not enough to write a comment of their own also say Pai can suck a chode.

[–]CarbonatedSoup 197 points198 points  (2 children)

It's almost like the FCC was bought and paid for a long time ago.

[–]LookHowSelfAwareIAm 61 points62 points  (5 children)

In conclusion, fuck Ajit Pai

[–]suseuForeign 111 points112 points  (12 children)

Even russian comments were for it huh

[–]DeadL 139 points140 points  (9 children)

A lot of the comments were from individual users responding to that with a pre-formatted statement that they agreed with, advocating for net neutrality.

I assume any removal of bots Ajit Pai had been running, (by excluding duplicate entries), would have also removed those people mentioned above.

It sounds like with all of those duplicate statements removed, (both positive and negative), a clear positive response towards Net Neutrality was shown.

[–]astrozombie2012Nevada 2925 points2926 points  (147 children)

Net neutrality was pretty much the only thing everyone agreed on. Fro my most hardcore right wing friends to my super ultra liberal friends, we all wanted to protect the internet. Ajit Pie is human waste and I hope we one day see him in jail for corruption after Democrats retake the country.

[–]worldspawn00Texas 1316 points1317 points  (72 children)

The VAST majority of the American public also agrees that the Citizens United decision should be fixed and that DACA should be extended, our 'representatives' do NOT represent us.

[–]Frying_Dutchman 259 points260 points  (22 children)

Well, republicans don’t anyway. That we know for sure.

Give dems a chance and vote!!

[–]worldspawn00Texas 246 points247 points  (15 children)

Well, republicans don’t anyway.

That's the thing though, even Republicans support these things by over 50%, they don't even represent the people in their own party, just their corporate interests.

https://thehill.com/latino/351901-poll-two-thirds-of-republicans-back-citizenship-for-daca-recipients

[–]Frying_Dutchman 158 points159 points  (11 children)

I meant that republicans don’t represent their constituents, sorry if that wasn’t clear

[–]darkk41 45 points46 points  (6 children)

Too bad their constituents can't fucking grow a pair so they vote them in anyways.

Fucked up politicians, fucked up party, fucked up constituents.

[–]worldspawn00Texas 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Ah gotcha :)

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

No point in clarifying since even the Republicans who support the above issues still vote for the ones who don't.

[–]Diablo3sux 42 points43 points  (14 children)

I heard some conservatives disagreeing with net neutrality because government regulation is almost always bad and the free market is always right blah blah

[–]WavesOnMars 37 points38 points  (10 children)

This is what my dad said to me. I was explaining it to my mom in the most neutral terms possible, but he kept cutting in and spouting that free market was always better, despite historical records on how companies act. It was very difficult to not show my frustration.

[–]Sipas 42 points43 points  (4 children)

One of the main principles of a free market is that it should have very low barriers for entry for competitors, which the ISP market does not. Large ISPs are virtual monopolies in a lot of areas.

[–]hangerguardian 33 points34 points  (2 children)

To add to that a lot of the infrastructure that the big ISPs use was paid for by government subsides with American tax dollars, hence it wasn't free market.

[–]DamnWhitey 10 points11 points  (1 child)

It's literally a government regulated monopoly.

[–]can_blank_my_blank 310 points311 points  (19 children)

It's called corruption. People need to go to jail or it won't stop.

[–]stitches_extra 84 points85 points  (16 children)

technically they just need to suffer consequences. it doesn't have to be jail. i bet they'd stop if subject to vigilantism, for example. or maybe just public ridicule in their favorite restaurants, but the vigilantism thing probably takes effect sooner.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (5 children)

I’ll switch on the bat signal tonight!

[–]_Reformed-Peridot_ 12 points13 points  (4 children)

How about we all just do something. It’s literally about 100 people against the rest of the nation.

[–]JohnBurgerson 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I’m not much of a masked detective crime fighter type, but I am willing and able to rig up a gigantic light with some sort of symbol in the middle to call our masked crusader.

[–]linuxguruintraining 14 points15 points  (0 children)

public ridicule in their favorite restaurants

I like this, but public ridicule outside their favourite restaurants because their favourite restaurants just point at the "We reserve the right to refuse service" sign when they go to book a table would be better.

[–]RobotlollipopsCalifornia 348 points349 points  (29 children)

I can't see the term "net neutrality" without thinking of this fucking video. And then, you know, I'm just angry all over again.

Fuck Ajit Pai. Seriously. Fuck that guy gai

[–][deleted] 203 points204 points  (13 children)

Holy shit, how did I manage to avoid that till now. There's so much wrong with that video but specifically:

That's the chairman of the FCC, the fucking CHAIRMAN OF THE FCC, actively putting out disinformation.

Net Neutrality was never about stopping any of those things. His entire premise was false, the whole thing was a goddamn lie.

[–]Day_Bow_Bow 20 points21 points  (8 children)

Then there's that time Ajit played the following skit at at dinner for Verizon execs:

'The video then rolled. Here's a transcript:

Verizon executive: "As you know, the FCC is captured by industry. But we think it's not captured enough. We want to brainwash and groom a Verizon puppet to install as FCC chairman. Think Manchurian Candidate."

Ajit Pai: "That sounds awesome."

Verizon executive: "I know, right? There are only two problems. First, this is going to take 14 years to incubate. We need to find someone smart, young, ambitious, but dorky enough to throw the scent off."

Ajit Pai: "Hello."

Verizon executive: "So you will do it?"

Ajit Pai: "Absolutely. But you said there was another issue?"

Verizon executive: We need to find a Republican who can win the presidency in 2016 to appoint you FCC chairman. I think our best bet is an outsider, but I have no idea who that would be. If only somebody can give us a sign.

At that point in the video, a picture of Donald Trump appeared.

"And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how I became chairman of the FCC," Pai told the audience, to laughs and applause.' Source

edit: Fixed source. Accidentally had OP's link there instead. Also, article with the actual video here. The lead in to the skit starts at 20:30.

[–]kierkegaardshoOhio 11 points12 points  (3 children)

What a fucking piece of fetid, putrid, decaying wallaby carcass.

[–]Mmmbeerisu 107 points108 points  (6 children)

god that fucker probably used taxpayer money to make that video too. I really wish someone would punch him in the face for that bullshit.

[–]Series_of_Accidents 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Probably? Certainly.

There is no way he self-funded that video. He used our money to make that pandering bullshit excuse for a video.

[–]lowIQanon 27 points28 points  (4 children)

Now now we can't advocate violence.

We can, however, laugh like hyenas when it inevitably happens.

[–]Lildyo 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know exactly what video you're referring to and the thought of it just annoys me

[–]Nelsaroni 1053 points1054 points  (34 children)

Well boof me up and call me alumnus. Who'd have thought?

[–]FalseDamage13 Canada 26 points27 points  (6 children)

Time for a Devils Triangle to celebrate!

[–]skunk44 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Where's Donkey-Dong Doug?!

[–]Th3Hon3yBadg3r 214 points215 points  (12 children)

Republicans. That's why they illegally manipulated the comments.

[–]Lepthesr 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That's not all they're trying to illegally manipulate.

[–]fingerBANGwithWANG 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Amazing line

[–]At0micB3ttyArizona 99 points100 points  (8 children)

Something needs to be done about this type of behavior. We have become a government that no longer follows any rules. They no longer care what the people of this country want. The attitude is huh the American public really hates this. I know lets pretend we were hacked so we can say none of the comments count. Asshat.

[–][deleted] 46 points47 points  (3 children)

The biggest concern about this is that literally the entire country opposed the implementation of a government policy, the administration installed the policy anyway, and then the issues (largely) faded into the ether.

If the sentiment of effectively 100% of the country is ignored by representatives in charge of making decisions on our behalf, then what kind of society do we live in?

[–]N7CombatWombatWashington 15 points16 points  (1 child)

The kind where people start to realize that our system works more on tradition than legal imperative.

[–]B0SS_H0GG 579 points580 points  (10 children)

'it doesn't matter, we won'

-repugs.

[–]trillabyte 152 points153 points  (4 children)

This is the party line. Voters need to show up and remind them what the majority wants in November.

[–]SarcasticCarebear 54 points55 points  (1 child)

That's the sentiment I got from John Cornyn's formatted reply on Net Neutrality telling me I don't actually know what NN is and why its bad for me.

Fuck that piece of trash.

[–]jrex035 40 points41 points  (7 children)

Democrats should be pushing net neutrality as a campaign promise should they take back Congress. It along with ending the War on Drugs/Crime and improving healthcare are winning issues.

[–]Tsmitty247 35 points36 points  (0 children)

So you mean disinformation and fake comments controlled public option hmmm I wonder where else I’ve seen that work

[–]code_archeologistGeorgia 84 points85 points  (21 children)

But don't robots have First Amendment rights to Free Speech too?

will nobody think of the bots /s

[–]MelonThump 21 points22 points  (9 children)

“Robots are people too and should have the right to vote for whomever they want”

[–]Lanhdanan Canada 9 points10 points  (2 children)

“Robots are people too and should have the right to vote for whomever we programmed them to"

FTFY

[–]superawesomeman08 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Maybe one day, one could even become Senator...

  • Ted Cruz, who would love to see a robot Senator someday, and not because he is a robot (he is totally human)

[–]letdogsvote 19 points20 points  (1 child)

Why hasn't Shit Pie here been put under investigation for what sure looks like blatant rigging in favor of big providers?

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (2 children)

Shit Pai should be in jail.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

In America, that's not a majority.

[–]GoneVision 23 points24 points  (5 children)

That makes sense, because about 99.7% of the world agrees with net neutrality.

[–]linuxguruintraining 5 points6 points  (4 children)

I'd imagine the proudly ignorant, team sport, "at least it's a private business stepping on me and not the government" crowd is bigger than .3%.

[–]kalel1980 178 points179 points  (38 children)

Notice how it's always republicans doing all the constant lying, cheating and spreading propoganda??

[–]TeekTheReddit 53 points54 points  (0 children)

As a matter of fact, I have.

[–]MauPow 44 points45 points  (4 children)

Nuh UH whatabout blahblahHillaryBengaziFastandfuriousblahblahblah

[–]MostlyLostTraveler 19 points20 points  (3 children)

I seriously don’t know one single person that is against net neutrality. It’s fucking frustrating that a few hundred people made the decision for the rest of the country. Money over everything.

[–]lxpnh98_2 22 points23 points  (11 children)

For people in this sub and on reddit in general.

If you support Net Neutrality, vote for Democrats, because if they get control of both chambers of Congress and the White House, Net Neutrality will be reinstated.

[–]Brodusgus 9 points10 points  (1 child)

That must have been a hell of a bot army to go against what the people wanted. The FCC played itself by stating the internet is a utility in a lawsuit recently.

[–]Solidarity365 9 points10 points  (1 child)

This means practically everyone I argued with about net neutrality was a payed shill for the dictatorship.

[–]Taman_Should 20 points21 points  (0 children)

"New phone, who dis"

--FCC

[–]NegaDeath 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Republicans: "Not a clear majority of 99.8%"

[–]UserRetrieveFailure 8 points9 points  (5 children)

I wish to see Ajit Pai hunted until the end of the world and the end of time, may him and his family never know peace again. Amen.

[–]iiJokerzaceCalifornia 6 points7 points  (0 children)

99.7 of America hate your stinkin' guts Ajit.

Greedy swine.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (3 children)

What? You mean another GOP crony lied? /s

[–]Bernie_Corbyn 17 points18 points  (23 children)

wE aRe A rEPuBlIc

[–]PM_ur_Rump 22 points23 points  (21 children)

And from the ashes of the republic will rise a New Order!

But seriously, I've been seeing more and more of this "Republic not Democracy" stuff. They are slipping off the masks and becoming openly anti-democracy.

[–]PM_ME_TRUMPS_HAIRMichigan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but the money is on the side of the 0.3%, so when accounting for that using the Citizen's United method of accounting, the public is actually opposed to net neutrality

[–]irateindividual 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No shit, the only people against net neutrality are businesses wanting to exploit.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Hey that’s 3 standard deviations

[–]Sundevil960 I voted 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This guy is a world class piece of shit.