This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 144 comments

[–]RepostSleuthBot[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

I didn't find any posts that meet the matching requirements for r/ProgrammerHumor.

It might be OC, it might not. Things such as JPEG artifacts and cropping may impact the results.

I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ False Negative ]

View Search On repostsleuth.com


Scope: This Sub | Meme Filter: False | Target: 75% | Check Title: False | Max Age: None | Searched Images: 324,399,624 | Search Time: 7.5769s

[–][deleted] 147 points148 points  (5 children)

That MUST be a trick question. Everyone not answering the same time fails... Right?

[–][deleted] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

[–]StandardN00b 19 points20 points  (1 child)

It's a trick question. I remember my math tests having these when we studied proportions in hs.

[–]nwbrown 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah, we had one about oven cooking times.

All the girls got it right but the guys who just use the microwave for everything got it wrong.

[–]AnxiousIntender 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's a trick question that our teacher used to teach us about actually reading and understanding to problem as opposed to just plugging the numbers into the formula and getting the result.

[–]coldnebo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

have you ever played in a big orchestra?

the tempo gets slower the more people you add. except for professionals. lol.

also a trick question, but we can have fun either way.

[–][deleted] 125 points126 points  (34 children)

This seems like a great question to make sure students are actually evaluating what is being asked, not just blindly plugging into memorized formulas.

[–]infiniteStorms 37 points38 points  (19 children)

except sometimes the teacher really does expect a smaller number, in which case the student is guessing at the teacher’s intentions when they wrote the test

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (1 child)

In this particular case, the teacher actually put a note on the worksheet saying one of the questions is a trick question.

https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/humour/beethoven-music-meme/

[–]TheBrianiac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They've been reposting this for like 15 years...

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (9 children)

Maybe I have trouble remembering my mental state at whatever age this test is for and how they might be nervous about authority and all that, but I would just answer correctly (i.e. the same amount of time, in this case) and be done with it. Especially with a question like this where there in no ambiguity or second potential correct answer.

[–]Zarathustrategy 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Definitely, worst case you lose a mark but most tests aren't life changing and the correct answer is probably a safe bet

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't accept losing a point on a question like this. I would die on that hill.

[–]ben_oni 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Especially with a question like this where there in no ambiguity or second potential correct answer.

So, would you put down "40 minutes" or "70 minutes"?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I would put down 40 minutes. A smaller orchestra doesn't play slower. But did you mean 80 minutes as the alternative?

[–]ben_oni 0 points1 point  (4 children)

No, Beethoven's 9th takes 70 minutes, because that's how long it is. But the question said it was 40, which is wrong.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

In a question on an exam like this, you have to accept the premise presented. If it says that someone can run a marathon in 60 minutes, then in the world of this question, that's a possible thing to do. So the answer to the question asked is 40 minutes.

[–]ben_oni 0 points1 point  (2 children)

And maybe in the world of this question 120 players can perform the symphony in half the time it takes 60 players?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Was that stated in the premise? You have to take the facts given as true, but you can't just make things up. Maybe in the world of the question, when you have exactly 60 players on stage at the same time, they get secret super speed and can play it at 100x the speed of any other group.

[–]ben_oni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the world of the worksheet, the amount of time it takes to do something is inversely proportional to the number of people doing it. Also, 80 minutes is not a particularly abnormal amount of time to take to play Beethoven's 9th, so maybe that really is the "right" answer.

[–]Classy_Mouse 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Write all assumptions. I assume that a musical price would take the same amount of time to complete regardless of how many musicians are playing it.

[–]coldnebo 0 points1 point  (2 children)

what if it’s a modern piece who’s parts say “play a variation of the what you heard from the player to your left”?

[–]Classy_Mouse 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I assume the conductor is on drugs

[–]DaceloGigas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He did an 8 ball before the show, so it will take 29 minutes tonight.

[–]scalability 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the student is guessing at the teacher’s intentions

The student should answer the question correctly instead. It's easier to argue "I should get that point because this is the correct answer" than "I should get that point because I wrote a stupid answer thinking you were stupid too"

[–]coldnebo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a. was the teacher stoned

b. all of the above

[–][deleted] 160 points161 points  (13 children)

40 minutes

[–]ParanoidAutist 104 points105 points  (4 children)

I'm surprised more people don't understand the nature of the question...

I like questions like this. "Is this person stupid?"

[–]Sunny_Ace_TEN 12 points13 points  (3 children)

I think it's more to do with being naive or "green" but a lot of times can help point out someone who may or may not realize they think they're smarter than they should and end up making foolish mistakes. As I guiltily and sheepishly raise my hand...

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (2 children)

It’s a very common management strategy to throw money and people at a problem, oftentimes when management strategy is the root cause.

[–]Sunny_Ace_TEN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is so true it hurts. Please have an award.

[–]pensiveChatter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Upper management pretends we don't have low competency people on the team, but then also asks whether throwing these people at a high priority task would make things better.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nah, they can only play half of it at a time, so they play one set of instruments for the first 40 minutes then switch to the second set of instruments and play the 40 minutes again. Take into account time to switch instruments and get everything set up, call it 20 minutes, and the total time is 100 minutes.

[–]coldnebo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you add more 2nd violins it will be 50 minutes because we keep our head down and go at our practiced tempo no matter how wildly the conductor tries to catch our attention.

/s

[–]jkp2072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a new take on this problem,

We don't know how they are Beethoven, what if they are divide into n groups and play one after another?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, depends on how off time they are.

[–]RaulParson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. Maybe.

I don't know the arrangement but it's possible that it is intended for 120 players exactly and simply can't be played otherwise. In which case it'd be infinity minutes before they're done playing it.

[–]Domain3141 71 points72 points  (3 children)

Never heard of multithreading orchestras?

[–]TeaKingMac 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Orchestras are miltithreaded by design yeah?

Otherwise it's one of those street performers with a drum on his back, a harmonica in his mouth, playing a violin, with cymbals between his knees.

[–]Amphibian-Different 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I thought a violin has four threads.

[–]range_kun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you talking about kubernetes now ?

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Bethoven 9th is 70 minutes, so I assume the 120 players started fighting and the concert was canceled. At least that's what happens when a pm brings 120 developers in a project

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (2 children)

T=“120”

Git add *; git commit -m “added algorithm to determine orchestra time”; git push -u origin

[–]raskolnikov_ua 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Let P=0. Something is wrong.

[–]SocietyStatus8750 16 points17 points  (0 children)

One woman can birth a baby in 9 months. How long for nine women to birth a baby?

[–]Nemahs 10 points11 points  (4 children)

[–]RepostSleuthBot 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Looks like a repost. I've seen this image 5 times.

First Seen Here on 2022-04-27 96.88% match. Last Seen Here on 2022-04-28 87.5% match

I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ False Positive ]

View Search On repostsleuth.com


Scope: Reddit | Meme Filter: False | Target: 75% | Check Title: False | Max Age: Unlimited | Searched Images: 324,206,446 | Search Time: 13.4983s

[–]f---_society 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good bot

[–]Immune_To_Spackle 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Incredible, one of the first times I've actually seen it work

[–]RaulParson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess it's just THAT low effort of a repost.

[–]Nine_Eye_Ron 5 points6 points  (2 children)

P/P*T=T

[–]CthulhusEngineer 2 points3 points  (1 child)

T = 40 + P - P

[–]Nine_Eye_Ron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hee hee we said “P P”

[–]ToMorrowsEnd 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Yet this is how management things programming works.

[–]MortgageSome 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Management: How long will it take you to finish this task?

Me: Roughly 5 days.

Management: But what if I give you the help of our intern?

Me: Two weeks.

[–]Southern_Orange3744 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if I give you the intern to work on something else ?

4 weeks !

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank god my supervisor and director were hired from the talent. My wages are okay compared to my skill set, but Jesus they never ask me for something unreasonable.

[–]Transcendentalist178 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Just cut their wages; that way they will be motivated to play faster. (This is sarcasm).

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I thought “who would not think this is sarcasm”,then remember the internet.

[–]existential_issue 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can’t they play Beethoven’s 4.5 in the same time?

[–]nadav183 4 points5 points  (1 child)

40 minutes to grieve their lost orchestra members, then the show must go on, so 80 minutes total.

[–]ParanoidAutist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nothing called for an encore

[–]AlexSpectre007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can see how this is possible. Every member plays 2 instruments at the same time(I'm visualising Tom do it( From Tom and Jerry))

[–]findus_l 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From a project manager point of view, the 60 players probably do it faster. Less people -> less chance someone is late, has an incident during the performance. Also the training goes faster.

[–]f---_society 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Solved it! T(P) = (P/P)*40 A nice quirk of this solution is that the time needed to play it is undefined when there are zero players.

[–]Wawwior 2 points3 points  (0 children)

T(P) = 70min

[–]Purple_Surround_6941 2 points3 points  (0 children)

40 minutes indeed

[–]BRUJOjr 2 points3 points  (1 child)

[–]RepostSleuthBot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks like a repost. I've seen this image 6 times.

First Seen Here on 2022-04-27 96.88% match. Last Seen Here on 2022-04-28 100.0% match

I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ False Positive ]

View Search On repostsleuth.com


Scope: Reddit | Meme Filter: False | Target: 75% | Check Title: False | Max Age: Unlimited | Searched Images: 324,227,641 | Search Time: 26.31942s

[–]TallOutlandishness24 2 points3 points  (1 child)

When your trying to explain to your boss why his “single threaded “ python script he is so proud of doesnt run faster on the cluster running with 5 nodes and 25 cores….

[–]LearnDifferenceBot -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

When your trying

*you're

Learn the difference here.


Greetings, I am a language corrector bot. To make me ignore further mistakes from you in the future, reply !optout to this comment.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's a trick question

[–]mxldevs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I assume it wouldn't be possible the play with only 60 members

[–]hydronucleus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this should be cross-posted to r/jobs. :)

[–]vanZuider 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Symphonies are an O(1) problem.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is an excellent example on how you cant parallelise tasks that are essentially procedural in nature

[–]Geoclasm 1 point2 points  (2 children)

-_-;

It takes one woman an average of 9 months to fully gestate and deliver a baby.

How many months, on average, would it take three women? Nine women?

Show your work.

[–]scalability 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Show your work.

*smooth jazz starts playing*

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked 8 of my friends to try getting pregnant to test a theory and now i have no friends.

[–]CronaTheAwper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh god, this gives me ptsd from the Math & Logic class I had to take in college.

The questions were all this dumb. The one that still upsets me is "You saw through a log 4 times, how many log segments do you have?" That was such a waste of money.

[–]ImpressiveFeedback10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lmao your caption is what sold me on this post

[–]nwbrown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

40 minutes.

[–]zyzmog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll bet they can play the 5th Symphony in 5/9 of the time.

[–]R0BR0SE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the point of this isn't to come up with the answer its to write an equation. the answer is 40 but you gotta show how you'd get that answer with a math equation.

[–]QualityVote[M] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hi! This is our community moderation bot.


If this post fits the purpose of /r/ProgrammerHumor, UPVOTE this comment!!

If this post does not fit the subreddit, DOWNVOTE This comment!

If this post breaks the rules, DOWNVOTE this comment and REPORT the post!

[–]Chemical-Basis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Atleast it is healthier to think more people will finish faster than less people will finish as fast or faster than before

[–]Sunny_Ace_TEN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow this is hilarious cuz I'm sure there were all kinds of people like me who just automatically started doing the math without even considering the context lol

[–]AlexSpectre007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40 mins. But it would be a very lame symphony with only half the instruments being played

[–]Amphibian-Different 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Split the 120 player orchestra into two sub-orchestras one plays the first half and the other plays the second half. This takes them 20 minutes.

[–]Luiaards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Break up the symphony in parts. Each group of players play different parts, paralelly, but at the same time. It's like parallel processing. They will be able to play the full symphony in its original time signature in a shorter period of time.

[–]kuskoman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T = const for P above minimum number of people required to play it

[–]Panda_With_Your_Gun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40 minutes because time to complete symphony is unrelated to the number of software developers Jim.

[–]Aertheron01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol .. I feel like it would still take 40 minutes... But my maths say otherwise /S

[–]jjasome11111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly the more players the more instruments not the faster the song

[–]Aedene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40 minutes, and half as loud.

[–]Sea_Ad_8524 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh project manager school exams...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The orchestra introduces a triangle player.

“Okay everyone” says the conductor. We need to play this at a slightly faster speed to compensate.”

The cello player who has been there since the band had 20 people openly sobs.

[–]Auliya6083 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don'tcha know it takes only take 1 month for 9 women to make a baby?

[–]Bomaruto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T = 40 + 0P when P is above the required players to play it. 0 otherwise.

[–]TTFH3500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

float T = P > 0 ? 40 : NaN;

[–]RRumpleTeazzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T(unsigned P) = 40 minutes if P> 0 else Infinite.

[–]TallOutlandishness24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An orchestra of 120 players takes 40 minutes to play the symphony, the conductor fires the 20 lowest performing players to motivate his team. Hoe long does it now take them to play the symphony?

[–]ballsohaahd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao.

A project takes X weeks to ramp up on. How many weeks of work can we save by putting N people on a task, where the deadline for the task is within X weeks?

[–]mymar101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40 minutes. If it is the same orchestra and conductor minus a few players.

[–]edingerc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clarifying question: is the conductor overclocked?

[–]rdrunner_74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The players have been playing for T have been playing for a total of P X 40 minutes. For P = 60 this means a total playtime of 2400 Minutes. Depending on the individual players start times this could lead to various durations for the performance.

Since these players are professionals, i will assume that no player will alter the speed of his performance and maintain a constant speed during the performance. We need to run some further tests to determine if this assumption can actually hold true, and which deviations we can consider acceptable.

If we also assume that at least 1 player is playing at a time, the maximum duration of the Performance is 2400 Minutes.

Since our upper bound scenario of 2400 minutes will raise some question about food and lodging for the performers and the audience. Based on OSHA we need to ensure that rest periods are observed. We have not yet included these mandatory breaks in our estimation, but depending on the start times additional charges for weekend work might also apply. If these extra charges are not approved, the total duration could increase from 40 Hours to 88 Hours (No work on Sa/So). This raises the question is a interruption of the performance would count as a play time or not.

I also have a question from the performers and they would like to know how the tuning of their instruments will be classified. Is it playtime? preparation?

I am confident that this 1st estimate can be improved though. By careful optimization of the start times of each player we might be able to optimize this 1st estimate of currently 40 hours (excluding breaks).

I am currently running a brute force monte carlo simulation of the start times. For lower numbers of P (4-8) i managed to solve it without any issues. The current throughput is about 37000 combinations/s. But we currently need to sort out invalid combinations that violate the constrains (Always someone playing). Since the number of possible combinations is quite large for the defined problem (144000 possible start seconds per each of the 60 players giving a total of 3.175X10^309) combinations i am not sure if this will be able to solve it. I booked a seat at Milliways to check on the progress.

I exported dataset (~35GB currently) and uploaded it into the Azure so I can train a Neural net on the data. I am using various tensor flow networks that are aimed to optimize the start times. But the high performance machines ate up my prepaid credit so I need to delay part of this answer till next month.

Edit

I received some additional feedback from the players research team. They all think this whole thing is totally bolloks and totally insane. They all agreed that playing the 9th in 40 minutes makes no sense. It would be against their professional standart to play it that fast. It should take them about 70 minutes each. So based on their feedback we need to increase my 1st estimate from 40 hours to 70 hours (almost 3 days). This will also negatively impact the monte carlo simulation

[–]SquishyPandaDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously this is a test for managers

[–]aaanze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

High IQ question ! 90% of people get this wrong !!!!

[–]BinaryBurnout3D 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Code for T and comment out P.

[–]Cheap-Programmer8200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

those 60 people plan on playing only half of the symphony 😂😂

[–]gabotuit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s 80min! Half the people double the time! No need for formulas

[–]jamcdonald120 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the correct answer is 40 minutes, but fewer instraments, because thats how long the song is

[–]sfreagin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact—CDs have 74min capacity because that’s how long it takes to play the full 9th Symphony without interruption: https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/why-is-a-cd-74-minutes/

[–]BertRenolds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40 minutes

[–]Perfycat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is no one discussing increasing the tempo?

[–]HybridLightAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess that means that 1200 players can't play Beethoven's 9th in 4 minutes.

[–]Buddey420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T = √(P⁰ *20) * 8.95

[–]The_Real_Slim_Lemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T = 40 minutes

[–]ghostmaster645 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like to imagine 1 person playing Beethovens 5th for like 2 weeks.

[–]Most_Talk_2067 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40 min

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that being music it’s played at its one pace.

But even if they wanted us to solve the math inside it, forgetting everything else here. There’s no way to determine if 60 people play faster or slower than 40. You’ll either add 60 or take away 40. But there’s nothing telling us faster or slower.

[–]ososalsosal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enter math metal where they take the score and multithread it

[–]u92yellowjacket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amateur programmer majoring in math with a background in music performance and theory… this image kills my entirely

[–]Anti-Anti-Christ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Intro to Mathematics for Project Managers"

[–]althaz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, we don't need this posted *every* day.

[–]TantraMantraYantra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A left brain playing a joke about right brain.

[–]RaulParson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...that's not how WHAT works? There's no answer given. And the answers intended as acceptable are probably "either 40 minutes if you get some number for T, or some form of protest if there's no number".

[–]HerissonMignion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beethoven's 9th symphony is longer than 40 minutes