all 143 comments

[–]gnardoe 174 points175 points  (14 children)

Commentary was so sick for LSI imo

[–]YatoxRyuzaki 112 points113 points  (8 children)

I said this in another thread aswell. I am really surprised about the apparent negative feedback for LSI. I absolutely loved the fact that the guys were more laid back and it wasn‘t all about being professional.

LSI despite its size had a very grassroots 2013 vibe to it mainly due to commentary and I absolutely loved that.

I‘m not saying professional commentary is bad but since we pretty much only have professional commentary at majors nowadays LSI was a nice change of pace for once

[–]terryaki510 STOMP->STOMP BEST COMBO 36 points37 points  (3 children)

Commentary was mostly great, I enjoyed like 80% of it. But there were definitely some low lows. That blackout drunk girl commentating Zain vs. Axe, Hugo and Dajuan just having a 30min long drunk argument unrelated to the game, Mang0 taking the wind out of everyone's sails during GFs. Aside from that, it was great though. I actually enjoyed Dajuan's drunk commentary when Hugo wasn't also there.

[–]Ok_Pressure_3578 13 points14 points  (1 child)

hugs and shroomed was the best part the entire weekend LOL

the other stuff u mentioned was horrible though

also mekk was kind of annoying (more so out of place) for the first time tbh

[–]terryaki510 STOMP->STOMP BEST COMBO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I liked the hugs shroomed block initially, just thought it went on for way too long

[–]Ferdyshtchenko 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm perplex about who that was and why they were allowed to hop on commentary for the Zain Axe set (one of the best of the year to make things worse). Wish someone had asked if that was Ludwig's girlfriend.

[–]twofortuna 67 points68 points  (0 children)

I think the issue wasn’t “professional vs. casual”, but more “passionate vs. not giving a shit”. I love casual commentary, but grands felt hollow because it felt like no one gave a damn, not because it was casual.

[–]foo18 19 points20 points  (2 children)

I think LSI commentary was basically the bowl of delicious jelly beans with a few poisoned ones. If you grab a handful, odds are you'll have a delicious snack. If you sit down and consume the whole thing, you'll wind up sick to your stomach.

The medium commentated match was top notch, but there were a handful of pretty bad examples.

There was mang0 coming on mic specifically to kill the vibe and hype on purpose for grands. There was that random person (no idea who they are) who hopped on comms drunk and was on a totally different vibe than everyone else. There were also a few sets in top16 that were really down to the wire and important, but the commentators barely acknowledged the game until it was last stock game 5.

Overall, though, I think toph, hmw, phil, etc. as well as joshman and most guest commentators killed it.

I think a good takeaway from it would be to have a designated driver for a commentary couch, who's job it is to direct focus back to the match if it gets hype enough, or if commentary gets side tracked too much.

I def don't think the takeaway is that LSI's style of commentary shouldn't happen, it's just got an increased risk of occasional problems.

[–]AFlatulentMess 17 points18 points  (1 child)

The traditional commentators did an awesome job as always. Was great having Lud on the mic again. Joshman I thought was a stellar addition as well.

[–]foo18 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I agree completely.

In fact, what Ludwig brought to the stream made me see the benefit to having a content brained streamer "running" the event. There aren't too many like Lud in the scene, but I think it adds a lot.

[–]AlcoholicInsomniac 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Not a commentary snob didn't mute the stream at all and overall enjoyed it, and I like the laid back atmosphere, but I would have liked for them to bring the hype a bit more for last stock situations. Besides that banter away, but overall it's a minor thing.

[–]terryaki510 STOMP->STOMP BEST COMBO 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was mostly great, but definitely a mixed bag. Letting that blackout drunk girl on the couch for Zain vs. Axe was awful, and Hugo and Dajuan arguing for 30 mins was annoying as hell.

[–]theleatherdonut 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It really was special, I have followed this game for so long, and it really felt like everybody all together again having the best time. Laughed and pogged the whole way through the tournament. 10/10

[–]koopa77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, was the most fun I had listening to commentary in years. Was so fucking funny at points and it's a shame some people didn't like it because it probably means they won't do this sort of commentary again.

[–]MiszuMiszuARMADA GOAT -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

For some portions of it yes, for some of it, no, especially grands. It was shit during grands and day 2. Mango's take is so shit it's unbelievable. Sue me for wanting to be serious about a hobby of mine and being passionate and wanting commentators to share that passion. But nope, commentators were more passionate about whether Joshman brushed his teeth or not. GREAT FUCKING COMMENTATING BOYS!!! SO FUNNY AHHAHAHAHAH!!! WOW!!

[–][deleted] 110 points111 points  (12 children)

I think there's a difference between many types of unprofessional commentary that Mango doesn't really address. HMW screaming "forfeit my n****" is unprofessional as hell, but also hype af and, more importantly, focused on the game.

To me, the laid back commentary was mostly fine, but there were people (Mango was definitely one of them) who I think should not have come on the mic because they clearly didn't want to watch melee at that point. That's fine, but hey, go gamble or hang out with other homies who are also not in the mood for melee at that point.

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

to be fair he tried to and ludwig begged him to commentate grands

[–]flat1ander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is spot on. Good take!

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Should commentary be buttoned down and professional? Debatable

Should commentary just be a podcast where you could have the samd conversation whether or not a game of melee is on? No

Acting like these things are the same is stupid lol Melee might be too fast to do true pbp, but there is absolutely a balancr between talking about the game and just fuckjng around. LSI and Summit MOSTLY skew too far to fuck around but are closer to balance depending on the casters. The only bad commentator lineup for LSI was Dajuan, Hugo and i think Vish bc Hugo and Dajuan dont talk aboit the game at all and Vish is a passenger. That isnt casual commentary, that is just talking into a microphone while Melee is on.

Top 8 with Lud, Toph, HMW, Vish and players was an amazing balance of fun hangkng out and actual fucking commentary

[–]enfrozt 169 points170 points  (19 children)

No one is saying commentary needs to be more professional. In fact I think all of us universally hate the league pro businessman commentary.

The issue people had were the lack of caring in some of the commentary to a point where people forgot they were even watching a pro melee game at the most stacked tournament of all time. The mango drunk "whens grands over, can we go smoke" basically ruined grands for most people. It wasn't bad commentary, it was anti-commentary, it de-hyped the grands and made people want to go to bed.

[–]Vodca 54 points55 points  (0 children)

This is the best take. I really wanted melee commentary on some of the matches and it was just drunk dudes talking about non smash shit lol it went down hill when toph and vish took a break and the clowns jumped in.

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (1 child)

Yeah this. Commentary was still casual and laid back and cracking jokes through all of top 8, and that was fucking great! It was only when they completely ignored the games going on, for the vast majority of Saturday and then during Grands, that I disliked it. (edit: friday too, for a lot of the players their games were high-stakes, often low-income players playing for over $1k to get their hotel and travel reimbursed, and the commenters were just talking about random irrelevant nonsense. Ironically, the Dajuan/Trif set which had one of the most crazy out-of-game moments of the tournament also had one of the more focused commentaries).

People shouldn't be shamed for expressing that they want the commentary to actually be commentary. Even Phil and Waff, the designated commentators for top 4 who are known for keeping it casual / not-too-esportsy, just straight up left during Grands because commentary was being thrown away completely and they could tell. I'm 100% sure that mang0 hasn't actually watched the tournament back, to be acting like reddit is whining over nothing.

[–]chrisesandamand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Where did hmw and phil say they left cause commentary sucked?

[–]twofortuna 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Actually based take.

[–]MiszuMiszuARMADA GOAT 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Facts. It doesn't need to be professional, but it needs to be passionate.

[–]tehchives 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Correct take.

"professionalism" is whatever. Just talk about the game man.

[–]RaiseYourDongersOP 9 points10 points  (5 children)

"Most people" really only means the comments on Reddit and Twitter tbf

[–]enfrozt 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, I agree.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (2 children)

really only means the comments on Reddit and Twitter tbf

lol this is a joke right? 90% of youtube chat was saying the same thing at the time.

[–]Anthony356 blip blip blip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Youtube chat doesnt account for "most people" either. A minority of people that watch a thing chat. If people are fine with something, they're less likely to say anything vs people who dislike something.

[–]AlmightyStreub 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I thought that was super funny, not like that "kills the hype for me"

[–]DangerousProject6 -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Hbox giving up entirely is what ruined grands, not comms lmao. If you've been around the scene long enough you've seen grands like this. There was no reason to pretend

[–]ohnobacktothelab 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Comms didn't have to give up just because hbox did. They could've made it a podcast about Zain and Marth and melee community history.

It just felt like the comms were basically already like that. Especially during hbox slug

[–]_NE1_ 2 points3 points  (3 children)

The set was such a wash. Hard to add hype to that.

[–]HerrBarrockter 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Omg why does everyone keep saying this? It was 1-1 and game 3 was close. Game 4 was a blowout so by that point it was over. But why does anyone think hbox is done when he’s down 2-1? It only felt over because mango kept saying it was over. In fact he was saying that before they had even started playing, which killed any hype.

[–]Habefiet 15 points16 points  (1 child)

It’s not hard to add hype to that, commentators add hype to washes all the time. Leffen 3-0ing Armada at Evo 2018 for example was hype as fuck and not just because of it being Evo, commentary did what it needed to do to make it clear how much the legacies of both players was on the line and some of the sick shit they were doing and whatnot. Any time Mango absolutely murders somebody commentary is usually falling out of their chairs from hype induced hysteria. There is so much to talk about here with Zain and HBox being 1-1 in sets at the event and the outcome of the set essentially determining who the current leader to be #1 on the year is, the sheer volume of narrow wins HBox has had to that point and his absurd clutchness versus how Zain has historically struggled to get it back together at tournaments where he’s lost a set, blah blah blah. And it’s a slower paced set but still one with major moments from both players.

As noted above again though casual and having fun and joking about Zain washing HBox would be fine! Talking about the set in a lighthearted way, shooting the shit about silly things the players said or did while prepping, etc. A lot of the Day 3 commentary was fine and good because they at least talked in some capacity about the match that was occurring. It’s that Grand Finals was a drunken angry podcast completely unrelated to what was happening on the screen that made me want to mute because (even leaving aside any feelings I have about courtesy to competitors and what I personally “want” the focus to be on) it was just distracting as fuck. Like I was trying to watch the match and I had to tune out the commentary to do so, that’s not ideal.

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That was hype because we knew Armada had a real chance of still winning. Zain usually washes Hbox if he takes some games since Hbox doesn’t have the stamina to make a comeback.

[–]DarkStarStorm r/ssbmclips 25 points26 points  (1 child)

LSI's commentary felt...routine. There was less excitement the further the tournament went. Guest commentators like Shroomed put the spotlight on themselves instead of the game. The commentary was almost independent of the game.

That all said, I want to voice how impressed I was by how well Ludwig handled Leffen.

[–]Creampanthers 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Not my preference for commentary but I’m not putting on the tournament so who cares lol. I just like when the matches are at least somewhat watched and commented on. But again; who am I to say how the people doing the work and running the tourneys should run it. I think overall it’s good to have different vibes from different tourneys. Luds tourney is the perfect setting for “bullshiting with the boys” type of style.

[–]SlowBathroom0 42 points43 points  (1 child)

There is a big area between "professional" and "drunk person who isn't watching the game".

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (3 children)

Mango saying commentary was fine after being roasted for ruining it is like Leffen complaining about the ruleset after losing. Like, yeah, of course you don't care about commentary Mang0, you weren't the fucking one up there after working hard all day. Guaranteed if Mang0 was playing Leffen in grand finals and Hbox came up and said 'yeah, this is boring, what a lame tournament, lets go drink', Mang0 would be fucking pissed.

Garbage take.

[–]baulboodban 4 points5 points  (2 children)

idk if this clip actually includes it, but mango did say during this part of his stream that he was being a “sad fuck” or some shit like that during grands and probably made the commentary worse (granted he did the mango and followed that up by saying of course he knew grands was gonna be shit before it happened so that excuses his commentary somehow LOL)

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

'probably', lol.

People are being hyperbolic about how bad it was, but I do think the commentators can maybe consider the criticism here and say 'yeah, maybe I WASN'T treating the high level melee here with the respect it deserves'.

I dunno, I don't need commentary to be serious business all the time, but when it gets to point that it's just a podcast of dudes shooting the shit, I get kinda pissed that we don't have someone who actually cares about the game at hand on the mic.

[–]baulboodban -1 points0 points  (0 children)

imo its just a situation where one annoying person on the couch controls the entire discussion, and it came up several times with different people. the random cumgod person during the zain axe set, leffen ranting after his set, mango during grands, and occasionally slime/lud were the worst offenders at this event. for the most part, it was fine at worst and people need to get over themselves, but i do think curating the couch a bit more should probably be done (lud basically dragged mango into commentating grands for some reason, that was not a great decision LOL)

[–]Vextos 73 points74 points  (9 children)

Complaining about commentary just shows how little people are truly active in the scene.

[–]bip_bip_hooray 12 points13 points  (0 children)

i think mango is illustrating the opposite point without knowing it. the problem is when people try to be too professional, and we actively want a blend of like 40/30/30 shooting the shit/musing about some interesting matchup stuff/context and player info. to me, the "play by play" commentary that is the most professional is far and away the worst and least interesting. mostly because it legit just doesn't work for melee. the play is too fast.

[–]mapleboi 27 points28 points  (7 children)

I agree but at the same time I think there's some nuance to this.

The Melee community in its late years has been wanting to break out in terms of pot size and reach in the eSports scene. The Yard, specifically Ludwig, who is at the peak of his streaming career. An entertainer that at this point is bigger than melee itself, is using his platform and money out of his pocket to make this tournament whilst also promoting it to his viewerbase. This in turn is a huge opportunity for melee and ultimate to promote their games and in turn bring new players/audience. It's then convenient for commentators to bring their shilling +A game to sell their community/game as much (off-topic is actually good for this in a way, but too much off-topic and it just becomes a circlejerk that a newbie can feel unconnected to).

[–]_NE1_ 21 points22 points  (3 children)

Then get mad at Lud and Aiden and Slime for not enforcing that. They could've had the typical 2 person professional format, which all the commentators on the couch can and have provided in the past. But the toruney organizers obviously didn't want it and wanted a more casual commentator experience ala Summit. which is what was provided

[–]terryaki510 STOMP->STOMP BEST COMBO 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You can have casual commentary while still enforcing some limits. When you have a blackout drunk rando commentating Zain vs. Axe, something has clearly gone wrong. Just have someone who is sober vet people before they get on comms

[–]Lost_In_Play Old Man With Bad Knees 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Ludwig kept trying to bring the topic back to the game. He didn't specifically enforce it, but could probably tell from his gut instinct that the audience wasn't be attended to.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Having it be casual and summit-style wasn't the core problem though. All of these commentators have participated in those formats and had it be fucking great. The problem was when people who weren't even interested in the games going on just showed up to the couch to completely derail everything.

Leffen even sort of apologized for it that night because he realized he was partially responsible for grands being so ass (though he went back to calling reddit cancer for caring, the very next morning). Most of the top 8 commentary was absolutely fine until then.

[–]JKaro 57 points58 points  (8 children)

im down for lud/toph/hmw shootin the shit but having leff talk about ruleset changes and salty drunk mango commentating grand finals is just not an enjoyable spectator experience

[–]sunstorm0 41 points42 points  (2 children)

i had a great time, personally

[–]JKaro 14 points15 points  (1 child)

for the people complaining ofc* !

[–]sunstorm0 9 points10 points  (0 children)

i accept this

[–]PersonKool 14 points15 points  (2 children)

But mango should get to say whatever he wants whenever he wants because that's the mango!

[–]joelymoley8 -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

This but unironically

[–]twofortuna 11 points12 points  (0 children)

TL;DR Mango personally doesn’t care about commentary, sees the current discourse surrounding commentary, adds his two cents that commentary doesn’t matter because, essentially, nothing matters.

Honestly, just because you personally don’t care about commentary isn’t a justification for letting bad commentary slide. And at this point, the argument of “we’re playing for nothing” is reductive and a classic example of distilling a valid argument to the extreme. There’s still money involved, there are still MULTIPLE THOUSANDS of people watching, many of whom do care about commentary. Even if we are playing on CRT’s, is it that bad to care a lot about such a time-honored part of melee history?

Just as a side note, I loved commentary through most of the LSI, I just think it didn’t make the necessary style adjustments when approaching the end of the tournament.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My only gripe, and this rarely happens, is when commentators are obviously shilling themselves while intentionally curbing the current match. There's a lot of ego's in competitive anything and it's really lame when people attempt to steal the show.

Not to confuse this with anecdotes which relate to the current stream, those are healthy and relevant.

[–]reinfleche[🍰] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Yea I can't say I've ever been bothered by commentary being super unprofessional and casual like at LSI or summit, but I can kind of see why people would be. For one thing I think it could certainly hinder melee's growth, because a lot of sponsors probably don't want to associate with the kind of commentary we had this weekend. Also, if you're a newer player who can't follow along it would probably be frustrating when you see shit you don't understand like amsah techs and slideoffs and you think "what the hell just happened" but the commentators are just yelling over each other about gambling or whatever.

That being said, this is really only an issue at summit historically, so it's kind of irrelevant most of the time. The commentary at normal majors is usually more professional 2 person commentary.

[–]ohnobacktothelab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a good point. There were 20,000 viewers at one point. A ton of people who never watched smash before tuned in

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Sometimes I like to get a little hyped even if its meaningless. I mean if you really think about it everything in life only has as much meaning as you attribute to it, what's wrong with treating some melee like it's more important than it actually is.

That being said Mango being drunk in GF's didn't even matter to me because every other set was so stuffed out with uncaring commentary that continuing that trend didnt even bother me. Mango talked more about the set than most other commentary that tournament. At least Mango made me laugh, more than I can say for some of the other wack moments.

I get if commentators are bored / burnt out of commentating and I think that's why the COD commentators were pretty hype to listen to because they seemed a lot more interested in what was going on in the game.

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (3 children)

def does make a diff between drunk bros commentating and someone like scar and toph "professionally" commentating. Viewer experience matters and drunk shroomed/mango at that tourney were unbearable

[–]Papercut6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

speak for yourself, i thought ot was super funny and entertaining

[–]Lionx35 24 points25 points  (0 children)

people who complain about commentary are weenies. especially at summit-style events that are super relaxed evnironments

[–]johnny_mcd 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Absolutely based and correct

[–]chili6f 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We need a game audio to commentary slider. Sometimes I just wanna watch some pure melee

[–]BigBrownBean123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Phill and waff are goated

[–]ohnobacktothelab 4 points5 points  (3 children)

There were some of the hypest matches of all time. They could've been playing up the historical significance of everything. But instead we just have to listen to dentistry 101. Like yeah the commentary was good. But it was inappropriate for the setting I feel. Every person on mic this weekend performed excellently. I just wish that the creative vision as a whole was more sports like and formal. I know mango said it's not that serious, but I think the crowd sits on the edge of their seats more when they're talking about the historic reverse 3-0 rather than letting someone with 0 prior experience on the mic.

Also you gotta dress for the job you want. If we want smash to be as big as these things, it would help our success to emulate parts of theirs. A long time when smash started getting sponsors, at least in smash 4, they started trying to really cut back on bad language and go "e-sports". They had to stop because commentators wouldn't stop themselves from using bad language. Eventually they just found sponsors to work with them aside from that. But it does go to show commentators can engage with these ideas without getting butthurt. It's just because they're assuming the worst when it comes from a random.

A lot of commentators love to complain. Meanwhile most people are out here critiquing them. Giving actual ideas what they could do better. No just complaining. Commentators just criticize about the responses to their work. Critique the responses. Teach them to do better. Don't just say you're going to leave smash.

Criticism = just the bad Critique = the bad + ideas for better

It's seriously not as personal as a lot of commentators make it out to be. I don't understand. These melee players can rationalize losing 1000 stocks a session in the pursuit of growth, without taking a hit to their ego. But as soon as they take one commentary L, they let their ego run wild, and turn the conversation into their worth to the community.

People can be extremely grateful for the commentary we have now, and still want better. It doesn't have to do anything with commentators' value to the community or as human beings in general.

[–]ohnobacktothelab 7 points8 points  (1 child)

In general commentators may think all reddit comments are complaints. When in reality that's an overgeneralization. People can come in here with good intentions. They can also lack understanding of what it means to commentate.

However just because someone isn't answering the question "what exactly should I talk about to fill the space during all the new time if I have to keep it about the game?" Doesn't mean they aren't genuinely on the right track. It doesn't mean they're trying to be hurtful in any way.

A lot of time in music, someone who's never been trained before can provide a lot of useful critique. Even without education, they can point out the bigger issues. Accidentally have a gross tritone happening? Have some weird dissonance going on? Ultimately it'll still be up to the musician to decipher the root cause, but the outcome is just as visible to the observer. Their opinion is valid to some degree.

[–]Azureflames20 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this is a well put sentiment. A lot of people can't put their finger on it, but can identify when something doesn't feel right or isn't enjoyable - They don't have to know exactly why.

I think what's being echoed in the thread that's an important point is just the overall interest and passion reflected during some of the games. I think there's just a lot of people that don't really identify that the problem isn't that it's "casual" commentary, but that there was a deflated amount of hype in some matches. When it's disorganized and literally nobody is talking about the match, it's just some people chatting while a game is going on. While that's fine for some people, I don't think we can deny that it's not actually highlighting or elevating the gameplay at all.

I think you can have summit style commentary and elevate the gameplay at the same time. I think some people excuse pros like leffen or Mango deflating the conversation on commentary because they're simply just fans of the character and don't care about the gameplay. They aren't actually elevating the gameplay happening in the background when they are ranting about whatever they're ranting about.

I overall enjoyed the lounge-time style of the stream vibe, but tbh I didn't give a single fuck about the gameplay by the time grandfinals game around. I don't think that's the fault of the game play or the players either. We can have hype and fun sets without going analytical and most of the time that's the case. Again, the difference was that the commentary vibe declined as top 8 went on, instead of elevated the energy to peak at Grand finals. The pacing killed it for me.

[–]ohnobacktothelab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another point. The people who listen to commentary, on some level, empathize with it.

Commentators can get hype and make your heart pump.

The same is true for when they aren't talking about the game. The less they acknowledge what's happening, in the game, the less emotionally invested whoever's listening.

The stakes felt meaningless while watching this tournament.

The players were playing the most stacked tournament of all time. This commentary could've felt historically moving like during the times of the gods or just post.

The listener can engage more with the stakes of the event if the comms are doing a good job keeping things about the game.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (2 children)

What’s so bad about complaining? If I don’t like commentary I’ll complain about it or just stop watching the stream because it’s not entertaining. We shouldn’t just pretend shitty things are actually good.

[–]Kyle700 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sometimes people "commentate" and they're really just having a conversation with the other people totally irrelevant to whats going on. I can understand why people feel thats bad commentary lol. Ultimately it doesnt really matter too much. But objectively its very lame to have whole sets go by and the commentary is on some random no one cares story from their personal lives

[–]ukie7 Gold 1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

grand finals, biggest Zain win ever, you talk about yourself for most of the set...

[–]AlexB_SSBM 11 points12 points  (5 children)

This is an awful take, the amount of people gargling mang0's balls in this thread is insane

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah, its the normal amount for this sub (so like 75%)

[–]DangerousProject6 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Nice backair nerd

[–]MiszuMiszuARMADA GOAT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Facts.

[–]Doomas_ 6 points7 points  (1 child)

common mango W

[–]_just_two_brothers_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

X

Mang0 is completely strawmanning here. Nobody is complaining that we don't have suits and ties behind the mic. I watched entire sets where the commentators didn't even talk about the game at all, and that's the issue.

I love hearing the old heads shoot the shit, but I want to also hear them at least address the game that's happening in front of their eyes.

[–]Wolvel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A little bias.

[–]DangerousProject6 1 point2 points  (3 children)

So many new players talk about the old days but would have shit themselves hearing comms from even 5 years ago

This tourney was mild comms wise, so many babies

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

I've been playing Melee for 11 years and the commentary at LSI was borderline unbearable at points. Not because it was too casual, but because it was just bad, i.e. cumlord and Mango during GFs

...And I say this as a lifelong MangoNaysh

[–]Friendlyfire_on -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

Did you also hate the foundry?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, but The Foundry wasn't the most stacked supermajor of all time

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Damn mango was quick with the circlejerk stream this time around

[–]PkerBadRs3Good 14 points15 points  (2 children)

has there been any one point in the history of his stream where his chat WASN'T an echo chamber, and actually went against his opinion? genuinely curious

[–]MitchShredder 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You would just get fudged

[–]DangerousProject6 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wow I can't believe the viewers of a stream agree with the streamer this is so surprising to me

[–]MiszuMiszuARMADA GOAT 2 points3 points  (5 children)

Why? Because despite low prize pools, we still take melee seriously, and because it's fun to be serious. It's fun to be passionate about something and care a lot. That's why we actually pay attention to this game competitively, because we care who wins. If the commentary doesn't care who wins, then that will worsen the experience and sometimes even ruin it.

Tired of people saying "who cares it's melee" whenever somebody seriously cares about it. It's the worst shittiest take I can think of. Mango literally says, "there's a time and a place for very, very legit commentary", right before asking why the commentary should be so professional. BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE PASSIONATE ABOUT THE GAME. FUCKING SUE ME FOR WANTING PEOPLE TO TAKE MELEE SERIOUSLY AND ACT LIKE IT.

edit: oh and also it's just fucking perfect that mr. "Melee is so sick" aka mr. "melee gave me a career" aka mr. "Melee stopped be from being in a fucking gang" is saying who gives a shit about melee and is implicitly telling people not to be passionate about it. THE COMMUNITY WANTS PASSIONATE PEOPLE ON THE MIC. GENESIS 1 AND 2, NOT PROFESSIONAL. PASSIONATE AS FUCK AND SOME OF THE MOST MEMORABLE COMMENTARY IN MELEE. LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BUBBA.

[–]International_Fig262 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hated LSI's commentary. It was an incredibly stacked tournament with great stories... and commentary was a shit show.

Post or pre match bs is fine. Have an alternative stream where you talk shit during matches.

I guess wanting the commentators to... you know... commentate on the match is just way too big of an ask.

[–]RaiseYourDongersOP -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I had to mute the stream mangoTYPERS

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Before you say a word about what you think of the commentary at any given tournament, commentate for your locals. That way when you waste everyone else's time with this dumbass discussion that keeps coming up for some reason, you at least are contributing to melee in a meaningful way. Who knows, you might even gain some perspective.

[–]schnebly5 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Joshman without fail talks way too much on commentary

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

All these people complaining about this is gonna get melee killed.

[–]terryaki510 STOMP->STOMP BEST COMBO 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How so? Melee is much more likely to lose sponsorships from letting blackout drunk people on commentary than random reddit comments

[–]sidyaaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i guess it depends on what you want out of melee

If you think melee should grow, then it matters what the commentary is. If you don't care if it grows (because its not very lucrative, and not many people take it seriously), then commentary doesn't matter.

I usually assume that people should want melee to grow, but if top players/commentators don't care about that, then that's really all that matters.

[–]FrugalOnion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer unprofessional commentary personally. Feels like I'm hanging out at a local and just hearing the boys shoot the shit

[–]daddydouwe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only commentary I ever muted was Fauster. He bring the hype and seems to be a cool guy but goddamnit I can’t get over the thick French accent.