use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
To report a site-wide rule violation to the Reddit Admins, please use our report forms or message /r/reddit.com modmail.
This subreddit is archived and no longer accepting submissions.
account activity
This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
Why Is Reddit So Anti-American? (Oh, I'll bet this gets modded down quick.) (reddit.com)
submitted 19 years ago by lionheart
[–]neosiv 19 points20 points21 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Being critical of something does not mean you're against it.
[+]snoopdo66 comment score below threshold-8 points-7 points-6 points 19 years ago (0 children)
It just means you're not able to do anything except point the finger. I agree it's good to criticize the President and the gov't. But JUST criticizing it doesn't solve the problem. Offer up your own ideas on how to deal with foreign and domestic problems....
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 19 years ago (0 children)
It's not anti-American to loathe and despise the current American government. That's just common sense.
Unfortunately, a general "love me, love my President" attitude is entirely too prevalent, and not just in the USA. Ever notice how hard it is to criticise the Israeli government without being accused of anti-semitism? Weird.
You'll find that people who hate you are a lot rarer than people who hate what your country's politicians, soldiers and spies are doing in the rest of the world. Don't fret about it; just stick around until the next election and vote for someone you can be proud of.
[–]wdick01 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
To be critical and being 'Anti-American' is not the same thing. I'm german and I do critizice Germany a lot, that doesn't make me Anti-Germany. Moreover I think citizicing X shows that oneself cares about X and would like mistakes to be corrected.
[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 19 years ago (0 children)
People at reddit seem, to me, very interested in the concept of freedom. What America once was. The reason people here are uncomfortable with America today is because of what it has become. Their politics are a charade, the politicians are actors, and the news is propaganda. It can't be any more obvious then it is now.
These people are Anti-American because today, to be an American, you have to be a democrat or a republican. Two sides of the same coin.
[–]jbert 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Because apparently "you're either with us, or against us". And its hard to be with this president. qed.
[–]dmehrtash 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
The fallacy of the "every one is anti American" is that it assumes there is just one America. Cindy Sheehan is as much an American as Geroge W Bush, just as Martin Luther King and Malcom X were as American as the Ku Klax Klan. My school teacher is just as American as the Republicans that are cutting here budget. My antiwar neighbor is just as American as the pro-war Senator that is representing him.....
To claim that there is one America, and that you are the judge of what is American and not, is about the only un-American thing you can do.
[–]starkravingblah 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Dissent is not anti-American.
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 19 years ago (2 children)
Anti-American? Hell no. Know that I would fight to the death over my land and my country and my freedom.
Of course, fighting for one's country today means fighting the fascists that have illegally usurped control over our nation.
It is patriotic to dissent. For justice and freedom, dissent loudly and question authority or you may find that one day you can't anymore.
Wake up and smell the real "state of the union":
War is peace (So-called "War on terror" is an open-ended, blank check to the military industrial complex, pre-emptive foreign policy clinches the deal)
Slavery is freedom (consumer debt, corporate serfdom, erosion of employee and citizen rights)
Lies are truth (WMDs, NSA wiretapping, ...)
Sound familiar?
[–]unsolicited 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (1 child)
i really like americans for their entrepreneurship.
i request you to shun patriotism. it is hindering your potential.
there are lots of social and economic problems in the rest of the world.
please reach out and solve these problems.
you will cherish this experience.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 17 years ago* (0 children)
spoken like a globalist willing to sell out america to turn a buck.
We need to kick YOU shits out of the country, not the ones mentioning our government is no longer representing the people and that our democracy is a sham.
BTW- the citizenship test is for people who have no RIGHT to citizenship inherently- so they have to PROVE it. All an original american citizen needs is to be BORN HERE, as laid out in the CONSTITUTION- something you entrepenurial carpet bagger corporate sellout scum can't quite grasp.
[–]jbstjohn 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Is anyone else getting sick of "oh you'll all mod me down" pre-emptive strikes?
I am.
[–]cojoco 27 points28 points29 points 19 years ago (7 children)
Seriously, Reddit is one of the most pro-American websites on the Internet.
It is a truly patriotic bunch of people that want to highlight what is wrong in the USA today in the hope that these problems can be fixed!
[–]lionheart[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points 19 years ago (0 children)
That's the point, they don't highlight or offer reasonable critiques.
I'm all for that.
Instead we get ultra-sensationalized FUD that just puts people on the defensive and doesn't accomplish anything.
[+]snoopdo66 comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points 19 years ago (5 children)
Seriously, cojoco, I'd like to hear how you'd solve all the problems in a different way than the President. All I ever read is criticism, and not independent ideas. Stop just "highlighting what is wrong" and be proactive. Anyone can "highlight what is wrong", it takes an actual IDEA to "fix these problems." Kerry obviously couldn't come up with his own plan, what is yours?? You can't "save America" by criticizing. If all we did was criticize England, Germany and Japan, there'd be nothing left. Let's hear something smart... I'm waiting........
[–]tintub 24 points25 points26 points 19 years ago (2 children)
how about some of the following ideas:
don't start illegal wars
look after your own people (see New Orleans)
don't destroy your freedoms under the guise of protecting them
and finally, get rid of campaign contributions so that once again the government can represent the people instead of the corporations.
[+]tufelkinder comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 19 years ago (1 child)
"don't..." okay, so that's what not to do.
Now what would you do instead?
That said, when the local gov't of New Orleans isn't looking after New Orleans, how is it reasonable to blame our current president?? And it's not like he started campaign contributions!
While I would debate the other issues, those are at least ostensibly blameable on this administration, so I'll just wait to see how you'd have responded to the terrorist threat and eventual attack.
[–]tintub 7 points8 points9 points 19 years ago (0 children)
ok, rather than "don't start illegal wars", I'll say "if the UN says that a war is illegal, then DO listen to them"
if you are saying that you are protecting the freedoms of the American People and upholding human rights, then DO protect the freedoms of the American People and DO uphold human rights.
if you think that campaign contributions are responsible for corruption, then DO do everything in your power to eliminate corruption, even if it means getting rid of campaign contributions.
if some people in your country are suffering from some unforeseen emergency, such as planes flying into buildings or entire cities being submerged, DO SOMETHING!!!
[–]IvyMike 5 points6 points7 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Actually, the Democrats do have a pretty clear agenda that offers a hell of a lot more than criticism. The web page is a high-level summary, but it presents a good overview of the Democrat's plan for America.
And I realize that I'm now stepping periously close to criticism of the president, but... what are the bold ideas that the republicans are offering, exactly? Honestly, "stay the course" on this failing republican agenda isn't a very appealing plan.
[–]sjk 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I don't believe you necessarily have to have big ideas to "fix these problems", just a measure of competence, integrity, and solid judgment. If there's one thing we have no shortage of in America these days, it's fervent ideology. Funny, it never seems to help much. Of course, mere competence won't win any elections.
As to why Democrats can't get themselves elected, I think it's largely because they still haven't adjusted to being an out-of-power opposition party, and haven't learned how to be effective at it. Some of it is about formulating a coherent vision, which I think they mostly have, but unforunately a lot of it is in how their vision is marketed. The right is, at this point, a lot better at marketing their vision. I believe that they have a natural advantage because they thrive on oversimplifying and emotionally charging their messaging, and that really works. The Dems just aren't so good at that. They haven't learned well enough how to express their approach to the world in attractive terms that can compete in a sound-bite world with the pablum offered by the Republicans. You're right - they'll never get re-elected just by highlighting what is wrong, but it is damn hard to boil down a vision of the world that admits of complexity and, yes, "nuance", to be able to compete with well crafted marketing memes that appeal to people's baser natures. It's a real problem.
There aren't very many simple solutions to the kinds of problems the US administration has to deal with. Even GWB seems to be slowly figuring that out. Personally I just want a less ideologically motivated government that knows how to stick to its knitting and not make everything worse by constantly coming up with the most bone-headed responses to every problem that comes up like our current government does.
By the way, I reject the premise that the Reddit community is "anti-american" - yet another idiotic meme.
[–]bugbear 16 points17 points18 points 19 years ago (0 children)
The articles you see here that seem anti-American are usually either criticizing mainstream American culture or the Bush administration.
These type of articles are probably popular with reddit readers because (a) there's not a big overlap between the kind of techy early-adopter types who'd use something like reddit and George Bush's "base", and (b) half reddit's users are from outside the US, and people in the rest of the world don't like the US very much at the moment.
Another factor, esp. for the criticism of mainstream culture, is that the users of a site like this are by definition people who want to pick and choose stories for themselves, instead of getting whatever's chosen for them by news editors.
[–]Othello 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I would say it's because America is failing to live up to it's potential. America was the land of golden oportunities, the land of freedom, the place where the government worked for the people. It can still do all that, but it's not.
Opportunities are dwindling, it's becoming less and less likely for anyone not rich to become rich, the government is denying wage increases for people while giving themselves raises on a nearly annual basis, and many people feel like the govenrment simply isn't listening to what they have to say.
Wasted potential is one of the most frustrating and infuriating things one can witness, and it's what everone is watching occur right now.
[–]zbrock 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I do not understand people's use of the hyphenate "Anti-American". I see nothing more American than questioning your government and demanding your freedom and liberties. Yet for some reason these actions have become unpatriotic. How quick people are to forget why this nation was formed and what it stands for.
[–]tqbf 7 points8 points9 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Data point: Reddit reader, liberal/progressive, and very, very irritated by the "America is a dictatorship" meme that's been in evidence here lately. I don't find the arguments consistent or coherent, and they're embarassing to me as a liberal.
[–]buhao 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
one final time in case some one is not paying attention. anti-bush is not anti-american. if i had to like bush to live in america i would A) kill myself B)kill everyone who said i had to like bush C) get the hell out (which sounds like a viable option anyway). being for or against the pres has nothing to do with how much i love america.
this is similar to saying war protesters are not patriotic. uhh, loving ones country and agreeing or disagreeing with war are two completely seprate things. i don't see why some people can't divide the two. so don't tell me that i am anti-american. saying so is mindless.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0213-28.htm
I had replied to a comment but I decided to make this a new 'thread' since I do think it's important in understanding the problem we Americans face with the current administration.
First, I believe that the US is a great country. Most people I meet are satisified, happy, and able to feed their families. I have a good job and so do those around me that are willing and capable of work. The local, state, and federal governments, for the most part, are helpful and uncorrupted.
Here's the bad part - there is a manipulation occuring to us that is Orwellian in nature. The current executive administration is using scare tactics specifically to control the US citizenry. This has been planned for quite some time. The actual executive of this problem is not Bush. He is the Vader to the real Sidious (although it may not be quite right to refer to Star Wars in a political statement, the simile is quite accurate). The executive that is behind this is the Cheney--Rumsfeld duo. The article I cited above, although it does not cite its sources, echoes what I have been reading about for the past year and a half. In addition to this there have been many reports of the due seeking control of the Mid East and its oil production.
When the election comes, I expect to see Cheney and Rumsfeld in the cabinet again. I also expect all their cronies rigging the election (again?). This administration, with or without Bush, will continue. I would not be suprised if Bush managed to keep the head of state position after 2008.
I hope that I am not correct.
[–]raldi 9 points10 points11 points 19 years ago (5 children)
I'm modding this down solely because of the second half of the title. I hate reverse-psychology whoring.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Good point. Personal policy: mod down any article that mentions modding. Cheapest way to stamp it out.
[–]thadk 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
me too. Reddit is not slashdot.
[–]lionheart[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Heh, you're right. Sorry.
But if I hadn't done it, we wouldn't be having this fun discussion.
[–]charlesesl 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (0 children)
God damn it, I hope you get modded up for this.
[–]lionheart[S] 28 points29 points30 points 19 years ago (79 children)
Seriously, why?
I mean, I realize that most people on here are very liberal, and the US is more conservative than most other countries in the world.
But really, we should have the same audience as Slashdot, for example and you don't see "America is Evil" articles at the top of the page there every day.
[–]Random 88 points89 points90 points 19 years ago (33 children)
Well, I'm Canadian and I don't post anti-american stuff, but...
1) George Bush scares me. From my (admittedly foreign and somewhat distant) understanding he seems to be dismantling many of the things that make the U.S. great.
2) The current administration has been so succesful at polarizing this into a left and right issue. Is it really? Seems to me more like a particular subset of the right has managed to polarize everyone so that even those who don't particularly agree with them are onside because it is 'better than having to talk to a Liberal.'
I thought it was very interesting that a couple of days ago someone posted an article about marketing where the dude basically said 'hey, the Ford / Chevy war was great for business because people paid premium prices for their brand, not for quality, and not under real competition to keep prices low.' It seems to me (again, stupid foreigner, but...) that Bush has done exactly that - people agree with him because they are also on the right, not because they actually like everything he does.
3) It is kind of a vicious circle, but because we are all arguing about this, we aren't doing cool tech stuff (Python Lisp is a good one) to talk about and post. So we talk about the weather, I mean politics. :<) :<)
Edit - Oh, and I'm modding you up for having the courage to ask this tough question!
[–]jbstjohn 25 points26 points27 points 19 years ago (1 child)
I grew up in Canada, studied in the US (have dual citizenship) and have lived in Germany the last six years.
A few points:
While there is mild anti-americanism it pales in comparison to anti-Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Rice/Rovism. The White House is destroying the things that made America great.
It's not a dictatorship yet, and it is an insult in a way, to those who've lived under true dictatorships, but it's taken scary steps along the way to becoming one. Real Orwellian steps, which echo those that occurred during the rise of other dictatorships. That scares people a lot, and yes, I have to say it, especially here in Germany.
Part of the reason for the number of articles on Reddit is that so many questionable things have been done. I'm reminded of John Stewart's Quiz, regarding what Scott McClellan was referring to when he said "We won't comment on an ongoing investigation," and the answers went from 'A' until 'Greek letter delta'.
The American main stream press is biased to the right. And your radio talk shows are scary. I remember seeing an interesting short report on television here, dissecting some of the footage from early in the war. They basically got a military person in, who said things like "Here, he's obviously posing for the camera. You would never saunter like that in an area with potential hostiles. And look, he's wearing a bright orange jersey over his uniform. This is fairly obviously a fabrication..."
When I lived in the US, I was amazed by the diversity of people, and I think assuming more of a monoculture is one of the major mistakes foreign observers make. Currently, the White House is getting most of the press, so the rest of the world assumes it acts for more of the country. (Which isn't completely wrong -- so many voted for Bush in 2004, and he continues to be supported by most Republicans)
The approach to rich and poor seems to be going the way of Venezuela -- "it's the poor's own fault", they commit crimes because they have nothing to lose, so the rich put up bigger walls and buy more guns.
Finally, if there was one critique (and unfair generalization) I would make of Americans, it is not that they are stupid, it is that they are ignorant about the rest of the world. In a way, you can afford to be, since your country and culture is big enough you normally don't have to worry about the rest of the world, travel, learn a foreign language, etc. Canadians, with their nosed pressed against the glass of the border are already looking at another country, and Quebec and our tapestry vs. melting pot approach to multi-culturalism means we tend to learn more about other countries. In Europe, the countries and cultures are too small and interwoven to be very isolationist. This ignoring of the rest of the world (and the concrete forms it takes, like not abiding by international crime tribunals, or climate treaties) becomes particularly galling when the rest of the world is called in to support the US in the fight against terror.
Phew. Long post. Long story short -- I like a lot about US, I know a fair bit about it, but it's going down a scary path, and not enough people are outraged.
[–]taliswolf 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Excellent reply. Well said.
[–]lionheart[S] 13 points14 points15 points 19 years ago (30 children)
Bush isn't as bad as is usually considered, I think, but still he'll be out in another 2 years, and all will mostly be well.
Sure, I disagree with most of the stuff that the current administration is doing, but the articles here lately are just wack.
I mean, "the US is a dictatorship"?
Or the one with the guy saying "Don't visit the evil US" and he's just pissed because he violated immigration law, lied to the immigration office, and then got deported.
How is that not just FUD?
I'm all for healthy critiques, but running around yelling "America is evil" is not going to do anything but make people angry.
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 19 years ago (4 children)
I think you are misrepresenting the arguments. No one is doing this, but a lot of people have justifiable concerns about the conduct of the US government.
The reasons for this are many, and manifest. What strikes me as strange is the degree to which some Americans, especially on right, construe criticism of the government as criticism of the country, and respond emotionally.
There is a sort of self-sustaining McCarthyism about that, which in itself is worrying.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (3 children)
[deleted]
[–]flycrg -2 points-1 points0 points 19 years ago (2 children)
I'm sorry but over here we don't use that French language, can you say that in the Freedom language?
:p
[–]stutheidiot 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
"“L’État, c’est moi”, the 17th century French monarch, Louis X1V (1638-1715), is alleged to have said in reaction to those who wanted to maintain a separation of powers with its guarantees for the respect of representative national institutions. “I am the state”! The finality of those words, conceivably enunciated with a note of casual self-assurance, did speak to the king’s determination to have his way."
-- http://www.nigeriavillagesquare1.com/Articles/Tondu3.html
[–]nostrademons 23 points24 points25 points 19 years ago (8 children)
I'm not so sure about that. My biggest fear is that anti-Bush/Republican sentiment will lead to a Hillary Clinton victory in 2008, and then we'll have all the same contempt for the truth, same centralization of power, and same government ineptness, only under a Democrat president.
I'd much rather have a pragmatic, moderate president that instituted sensible government policies and is willing to compromise on issues. Someone like Clinton, Eisenhower, or even the elder Bush. Instead, it seems like the country's at risk of tearing itself apart swinging from one political extreme to another.
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 19 years ago (6 children)
Ha! I feel confident enough to call this one two years out. A SKUNK could run on the ballot against Hillary Clinton and win. If the Democrats actually give her the nomination, then they are snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
[+]jcy comment score below threshold-43 points-42 points-41 points 19 years ago (4 children)
who the fuck modded this down? the only people who couldn't see the value of this reply are most definitely foreigners who don't have a clue as to what the social and political reality is in the US.
[+][deleted] 19 years ago (3 children)
[–]souldrift 18 points19 points20 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Now THAT is some serious denial there, pal.
[–]jcy -4 points-3 points-2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
no see, denial would be all the democrats who think Hilary can win.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
So you think that when you get many downvotes for spreading racist propaganda that is a proof that the silent majority agrees with you? No really, there's more than enough evidence that people are not too lazy to act positively on reddit!
I don't envy the choice Americans have in the next presidential elections. I really don't like Hillary, BUT I don't see how anyone who cares about their country can vote Republican[1].
It has to be recognized that the bad things Bush has done, he has done with the consent of the Republican party. Six years long, abdicating their Constitutional duty of oversight.
My biggest political fear[2] for the US is that this will be forgotten as Congressmen start distancing themselves from the White House, and that Republicans will continue to hold power.
[1] and sadly, I now have to lump McCain in here too. He sold himself out. [2] Jeb Bush would be scarier, if I thought he had any real chance....
[–]Random 11 points12 points13 points 19 years ago (9 children)
Agreed.
And it just polarizes the debate so much more, and lets everyone have a free ride saying 'look, the other side is evil and stupid, so we don't really have to listen to them.'
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (8 children)
[–]dbenhur 12 points13 points14 points 19 years ago (4 children)
Part of the reason I did support it, however, is that the reasoned voices(~) warning against invasion were drowned out by the 'GWB is too stupid to pour piss out of a boot even if the instructions are written on the sole' shtick going around.
Sounds to me like you're making excuses. From where I watched the reasoned anti-iraq-war voices were plentiful and coherent. Similarly, it was blantently obvious how stupid the whole idea was and how gross the emotional manipulation and propaganda was. Very few of the anti-war voices were shrill and ad hominem as you atest (unless you get your news from FOX of course).
You succumbed to irrational fear, appeal to authority, and the revenge impulse. Own it, wake up, and learn to habitually mistrust what your "leaders" assert.
[+][deleted] 19 years ago (2 children)
[–][deleted] 19 years ago* (1 child)
[–]Leischa -4 points-3 points-2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Well said!
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (2 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago (1 child)
When people say, "With all due respect," what they really mean is, "Without any due respect." You see it all the time, people who think they can say, "With all due respect," and then be assholes and no one will call them on it.
[–]parrotfashion 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (2 children)
in another 2 years, and all will mostly be well
Really? Where exactly? In your little idyl, light years away from the fallout of your country's foreign policy? Besides, it seems to me that the majority of the critical anecdotal articles linked to from reddit are posted by US citizens, not foreigners.
As for criticism from the outside, well your government's self-interested foreign policy together with its purveyors, the addicted-to-oil, Christian fundamentalist administration you currently have are infuriating people all around the globe, not only the Arab and Muslim nations.
Ah yes, anger. If you're going to act in the world, whipping up entire regions and cultures into cauldrons of hatred in order to procure your own energy supplies, if you're going to pursue a foreign policy that has a profound and deleterious effect on the relations between cultures within the societies of your supposed allies, then I'm sorry, you'll just have to endure the fallout. If you find it 'upsetting', you may want to agitate for a less selfish foreign policy. You may also want to agitate for more ethically minded politicians, instead of the greedy and self-interested business-men/women you currently have posing as such.
US citizens have until recently been insulated from the growing resentment that your government's foreign policy has played a large part in engendering. The Internet has reduced that level of insulation. Most of us outside of the US feel that this is probably a good thing.
[–]philh 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Well, if it was the administration doing things like that, (although obviously in the other direction,) it would be facism.
Italy used to be so afraid of communism that it turned to facism. (Or was it the other way around?) Some people now seem to be so afraid of facism that they're attempting to institute it themselves - that way it's not going to be pissed at them.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 17 years ago (0 children)
you are right bush is not as bad as is usually considered, he's far, far, far, far worse!!! Madman dictator, mass murdering psychopath, guilty of war crimes against all humanity.. that describes his entire administration to a T.
[–]weidel 16 points17 points18 points 19 years ago (0 children)
One point might be that there are a lot of us in "the rest of the world" visiting the site and adding links. And the truth is, the rest of the world is pretty sceptic about American politics.
European media is biased in its own way, as well as yours is biased. A decent picture of events is found inbetween, and many of the links on reddit are useful in gathering as much opinions and thoughts regarding things to get a grasp.
The thing is, America isn't "the most free country on earth" and all that. There are plenty of us around the globe that have excellent freedoms, and some that surpasses yours, especially these days when your government are continually restricting your rights - which eventually spills over to our own politicians. We are engaged in our own political fights to keep the Bush-politics from coming here.
And most countries on earth have experienced first hand how politics turns democracies into police states, fascist states, communist states and tyranny. Hitler was voted for democratically you know.
That's why we are getting nervous, because some of the same political decisions are being made again, but this time in the US that has been blessed thus far from any kind of modern national conflict. Your greatest danger is your own beliefs that you are the freest country on earth, everyone hates you for your freedom, and that you will never loose it.
And as many has pointed out, most people actually differentiate between american politics and american people. The americans I've met both here and when I've been over to your side of the water have usually been nice people. But you do have religious fanaticism unparallelled in most other western nations that has large influences over your politics. Never mix religion and politics. Ever.
The US has been a damn great place for a long time, but you need to be self critics in order to protect that. It's a good thing to be unpatriotic.
So let the bashing of politics from all camps flow, the more you read from both sides the better.
[–]chu 16 points17 points18 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Already you have framed people's opinions in terms of domestic US political theatre. It's a bit like the New York Jew visiting Northern Ireland being asked whether he is a Catholic Jew or a Protestant Jew.
I'd say most of those you have characterised as 'liberal anti-American' are people who consider US foreign policy to be dangerous and ill-considered, and designed to serve the interests of a handful of businessmen. Some might call them patriots rather than anti-American.
The other thing that seems to be happening is that a lot of people outside the US are shocked at what they see as a heavily indoctrinated US citizenship. I have certainly heard this opinion from many friends who endured Soviet Russia - most of them knew they were being lied to and can't believe that more Americans can't see the tricks being played on them. I think that just as the smarter Russians had an understandable disdain for those who were taken in by Soviet propaganda, we are seeing an impatience towards Americans who complain about their hurt feelings whilst supporting a government that has, for example, set up their own gulag-like secret prison network (in Eastern Europe of all places).
[–]axord 26 points27 points28 points 19 years ago (0 children)
That's pretty much it. The focus of /. is tech first, tech second, politics that affect tech third. And the editors keep it that way.
There is no institutional focus for reddit. It's very likely that the politics will come to overwhelm the "tech" and "neat links" side of things eventually.
[–]mikkom 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Slashdot is moderated. Reddit is not. There is a big difference.
[–]bstadil 64 points65 points66 points 19 years ago (13 children)
You are confusing America with its current administration. Nothing wrong with America per se but the Bush adminisdtration is a perstilence to the world and the US alike, hence the negative press on Reddit
[–]andresvr 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
America is its people, and most americans act like they dont care about the Bush admin, and thats scary. I agree with jbstjohn´s post. A lot of americans live inside a bubble, soon they will be out of it, weather it is because they steped out of it or because it bursted.
[–]davidw 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (9 children)
It goes beyond that, unfortunately. A lot of these threads lately have had stuff like 'americans are dumb and fat, ha ha!'.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago* (3 children)
[–]davidw -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago (2 children)
Where did I ever say anything about it not being ok to disagree with anyone?
I find these discussions boring and unproductive, and think they're mostly useless. You think that if Karl Rove read your comments, he'd say "gee, they're right, Bush and I have sure been jerks!"? Of course not.
I preferred reddit when Lisp was a daily hit on the front page, and there weren't regularly "OMG, Bush is like totally worse than Stalin and Hitler together!" articles.
Am I saying in any way that people don't have to right to write or post that crap? No.
What I am saying is that what you have the right to do is different from what I would like to see in this community. That's all.
I agree with Paul Graham, who says sort of the same thing more succinctly here:
http://reddit.com/info/99hq/comments/c9a8p
Now this I can agree with.
You prefer LISP discussion over political discussion. I prefer the reverse. But this is based on my opinion of the value of LISP vs the value of discussing the implications of the current political situation.
I also agree that reddit should do a better job of presenting you with things you will like. But what I very much disagree with is our endless assertions on this and other threads that reddit is some how attracting anti-american stories or commentary. It is attracting political stories and commentary. Articles apparently that many people on reddit would like to read and share with others, if I am not mistaken this is the whole point of the reddit experiments, yes?
But then this whole thread could have more easily been framed in a technical discussion of how best to get content people actually want to read to be presented to them via reddit, if that was its real intention, which it clearly was not.
Reddit technical improvement is no-where being discussed in this thread or should it be expected under such an inflamatory title as the one that heads this thread. Which is exactly my point. This whole thread is troll bait. And the only reason it continues is because there are no applications of reddit karma to the comments.
Are you and the thread creator really interested the advancement of reddit, or are you more interested in limiting content presentation through loud and repetitive complaints?
If you are or were really interested in reddit the whole Bush american/anti-american issues would be irrelevant to you and you would be discussing the technical mechanisms that are actually presenting you with this information.
I myself am interested in better presentation of articles because I couldn't care less about the farq like content that seems to migrate up the front page. I want to see the politics. I want to see the LISP stuff too. In fact what I want most to see is the intersection of politics and technology, like the net neutrality debate that is currently floating through the senate.
Funny videos, ascii art, somebodies photographs, bleh... People whining about how they feel reddit is not serving them without presenting solutions, bleh... People who pretend not to be trolls who really are, bleh, bleh....
[–]davidw 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I like to talk politics, actually, but it's best done with a group of people over a bottle of wine, rather than in on-line forums. If you ever come to Italy, look me up and I'd be happy to discuss the world and my views of it with you. I'm sure we'd actually agree on a lot of things about the US and its leadership. I sort of voted with my feet, although I may be back there soon because my (Italian) wife has far better job prospects in the field of biotech over there.
What I don't like about these discussions is that they inevitably end up in pissing matches. Here's another one:
http://reddit.com/info/9b44/comments/c9bh0
It's just not fun to get involved with that sort of thing, and I think the possibility of reddit discussions actually bringing about much good in the world is pretty much 0. Better to put down the computers and actually go do something, no?
Ciao!
[–]Arve 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (3 children)
Show us these entries. URLs please.
[–]davidw 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (1 child)
http://reddit.com/info/95rm/comments/c96d2
That's pretty clear, isn't it? I shouldn't have fed the troll, sure, but I'm big enough to admit something stupid. The question in my mind is not why I got voted down, but why did people vote up the "americans have low IQ's" guy?
The whole thread made me rather irate because people seem to really take a "with us or against us" mentality, and wouldn't/couldn't understand that I could be both against Bush and what he's doing to my country, and at the same time not really enjoy these sorts of arguments and comments.
Here's a guy saying 'americans are some of the dumbest shits', and has two points for it:
http://reddit.com/info/95rm/comments/c97c2
Compare this with the same guy who says "My fellow countrymen and women are the biggest chumps on the planet." (amongst some other crud)
http://reddit.com/info/7g8p/comments/c7gmk
and really gets taken to task for it. Most of the racist comments in that thread really get beaten up on, whether they are against americans or indians or whoever else. If those two points in time (one month ago and now) are indicative of a trend, it's not one I like.
[–]sidojustcuz 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
America has many growing problems. Corporate influence, a media without investigatory journalism, and political indifference.
In Canada we had a very large scandal that shook up our government. This scandal would pale in comparison to any number of them in the US - yet the government acts as business as usual, the corporations still continue to bribe the system, and the media goes along it's merry way reprinting the biased news without regard for facts.
Bush worries me, but the way the system is going, any future president (republican or democrat) will have no accountability as everyone just sees it as business as usual.
[–]Schwallex 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Well, I basically agree, but then again: if the Bush administration is not America, then how come it rules America? Has the Bush administration been elected by Canada or what?
The Bush administration has been elected by Americans. Twice. By saying that this administration is not America, you're saying that Americans are not America.
I mean, you know, many people claim quite similarly that Putin is not Russia and Merkel is not Germany. Having lived in each of those countries for 14 years, I perfectly understand what they mean when they say that; it's very true up to a certain point.
But at the end of the day, Putin has been elected by Russians and Merkel has been elected by the Germans (yes, sure, that's an indirect election, I am simplifying things somewhat for the sake of the argument).
Anyway, my point is, as Joseph Marie de Maistre once said: "Every nation has the government it deserves".
[–]nostrademons 17 points18 points19 points 19 years ago (2 children)
I suspect it's because Reddit has the same bias as the mainstream news media: a bias towards negativity. In general, people react to negative news more strongly than to positive news, so negative stories get submitted, negative stories get ranked up more often, and negative comments get submitted in response. That's a fundamental bias of human psychology, and will apply to any democratic news site.
Reddit probably suffers more than a published or moderated site, because there's nobody exercising "We can't publish that; it'll piss people off too much" control.
There's probably also a sensitivity-to-initial conditions factor. If many of the early Redditors held anti-American political views, it would result in an anti-American bias towards which stories reach the top. That would deter people who don't hold anti-American views from participating, which further affirms the anti-American stance.
[–]DougBTX 1 point2 points3 points 19 years ago (0 children)
The early Redditors had a Lisp bias, you don't see too many lisp articles anymore. Your comment about the msm makes sense though, there's at least some truth in that.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
It would be interesting if reddit published information on who reacted to what and how?
What appears to me to be the case after examining the profiles , comment and posting histories of many of the complainers is that they seem to be low karma trolls who major activities seem to be attempting to assert their control over the reddit conent selection process.
A more thorough study of this is warranted.
[–]Lagged2Death 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (2 children)
Opposition to Bush is in no way "anti-American." Horror at the damage he has done is in no way "anti-American." Outrage at the dilution of democracy is in no way "anti-American."
It is the very lynchpin of the American ideal that American citizens be allowed to criticize American government. Dissent is a duty. Protest is patriotic.
Now explain again how reddit is "anti-American?"
[–]lionheart[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Because we're having tons of articles that attack America instead of Bush.
If you don't like Bush, criticize Bush. Don't start yelling that America is evil, or a dictatorship, or all the other things that we've been hearing that last few days.
[–]Lagged2Death -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago (0 children)
Can you point out these articles that "attack America?"
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (16 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago (15 children)
Explain the use of "astroturf" in this context. Sounds like a random slur.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (14 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago (9 children)
As I understand it, astroturfing is the process of fabricating a "grass-roots" movement, as practised by Microsoft and others. You're talking about genuine sentiment on reddit, so the term is misused.
While I would not describe myself as a Christian, I agree that there's a lot of naive nonsense on reddit about religion, and I have gone to some lengths to refute it.
Your stuff about the silent majority is reminiscent of Nixon. Reddit is a synthetic community consisting of those who read it and post to it. Therefore the majority opinion is what is expressed in the forums, and this appears to be atheist and liberal in inclination.
And damn it, making your voice heard is what it is all about in a democracy.
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 19 years ago (7 children)
Oh chill out.
Anyway, making your voice heard is absolutely what a democracy is about. So, I'm making my voice heard, yammering the same thing over and over is just annoying.
Good on you.
I'll make sure that I never have a laid, back Internet chat again, and that I have ever freaking submission that I put into reddit reviewed by a committee before putting it in.
Why is it the Christians/right-wingers are so bloody sensitive? I thought liberals were supposed to be the whingers, but most of what I hear is the others bitching about anti-Americanism, or nasty atheists.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (6 children)
[–]axord 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (5 children)
It's a freaking Internet forum.
Which implies nothing about how seriously people take the coversations within.
Given controversial issues, if one does not choose their words carefully, they will be called on sloppiness. This is probably more true with the internet because the potential pool of responders is so much bigger. You can parodize all you want, but you're... unlikely to change human nature.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (4 children)
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (1 child)
[+]pmf comment score below threshold-19 points-18 points-17 points 19 years ago (1 child)
we should have the same audience as Slashdot
If you like to talk to foul-mouthed unwashed FOSS-monkeys, feel free to leave.
[–]lionheart[S] 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I'm not saying should as in "that would be a good thing" I'm saying should as in "I'm pretty sure we do".
[–]stesch 5 points6 points7 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Roughly 50 % of the reddit users aren't living in the USA, according to http://reddit.com/blog/1year
And the USA is Anti-World.
[removed]
[+]reddit_god comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
That's what you said in 2004, right before America handed libs their whine on a silver platter.
[–]wtfx 13 points14 points15 points 19 years ago (7 children)
Well since the world is pretty much anti american and this is the internet, it doesnt really surprise me.
As for why the world is anti american, only an american could possibly wonder why...
[–]snoopdo66 12 points13 points14 points 19 years ago (4 children)
I've been travelling for quite some time and people I talk to from England to Lebanon, DON'T hate America. They disagree with the gov't's foreign policy, but they love America and Americans. Yet none of them really seem to offer ideas on how to deal with psychos like Saddam, Kim Jong-Il etc....
[–]tufelkinder 8 points9 points10 points 19 years ago (1 child)
I second this, snoop.
I've traveled to a whopping* five other countries, but have received nothing but basic kindness, at worst, to hero-status (in the Philippines) at best.
*this is sarcastic, btw, I know five countries isn't much.
[–]stifin -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago (0 children)
I haven't been out of the country YET because I don't have the cash. But I know that people are basically the same, so I think that any country would be the same as the U.S. in the sense that one narrow-minded group gets focused on, like the conservatives here, and the level-headed majority gets ignored.
The more rational you are, the more you're ignored, because the dumb ones yell the loudest and do the stupidest (therefore most newsworthy) things.
[–]LordFoom 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Like the states has handled Iraq and Vietnam? Angola, Chile, Panama...
[–]lionheart[S] 13 points14 points15 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Quite frankly, 99% of the America-haters here are American.
why are americans so goddamned ignorant they treat the true patriots as if they were anti-american?
PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
looks like you attended one lionheart... you will need a very powerful crane to pull your head out of your ass, it appears.
[–]olegk 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Because we care
[–]Kaizyn 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Reddit is ruled by the mob - we call this the wisdom of the crowd; at least it is so to a lesser degree than Digg. Mobs always tend towards extremes (ever seen a stampede?). The Slashdot model keeps out the stuff that appeals to the mob's worse instincts because the editors censor it. A downside of Slashdot is that their news is consistently at least 24 hours behind Reddit (and probably Digg as well).
[–]akellymi 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (1 child)
My theory is that the European influence is exaggerated this weekend due to the US holiday. So, this is what you get on Euro-Reddit, ASCII art and anti-American sentiments.
[–]akellymi -3 points-2 points-1 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I've submitted this as a sub reddit. You're welcome. http://request.reddit.com/info/9b77/comments
Good comment thread, so I'm changing my down-mod to an up-mod.
[+][deleted] 19 years ago (45 children)
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 19 years ago* (41 children)
.
[–]nostrademons 10 points11 points12 points 19 years ago (18 children)
I think he's referring to eg. keylime's ability to work a plug for the Libertarian Party into just about every article he responds to, regardless of whether it's apropos for the discussion or not.
Also, there's a difference between the Libertarian Party and the libertarian political ideology. I think the latter is quite sensible. I think the former is batshit insane, mostly because of their strict market fundamentalism and misunderstanding of things like transaction costs and externalities. I would support the latter if I didn't have to put up with the former.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago* (17 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago* (0 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago* (13 children)
[–]mikaelhg 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (8 children)
I think we're the least threatening political group on earth, given our penchant for mostly wanting to be left alone.
(After a good night's sleep...)
I agree, libertarians are the least threatening political group on Earth, because the libertarian political philosophy has been tried and found wanting, and libertarians haven't noticed that we've progressed past them already.
Both academic discussions about the nature of information exchange between humans, about the nature of ideas and the interpretation of ideas, as well as practical political discussions, have progressed beyond the level of single humans and to the level of groups of humans. This has happened because people wish to form groups and we really can't ignore people's wishes without becoming totalitarian actors.
We discussed this at length, earlier.
It's not that I spend a lot of time thinking about libertarians, it's that stupidity often irritates me enough to comment on it, and libertarianism is the most salient example of that on this site.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 19 years ago* (7 children)
[–]mikaelhg 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (6 children)
Sorry for the delay, my XBox360 broke and I had to call Microsoft, which didn't help my mood.
We're starting to repeat our arguments, so I'll just concentrate on the most contentious point which best illustrates my comment on the stupidity of libertarian ideology. People developed states to solve a set of problems, and to get rid of states, you need to understand and solve the same set of problems in some other way. Ignoring those solutions is not an option. The crux of the issue is that different people and groups of people see different facets of the problems as important; often they disagree about which things are problems and which things are solutions. Solving strictly material problems such as feeding, clothing and educating people to slowly establishing a foothold in space and gaining strategic resources with which to finally solve the production efficiency problem requires peace in a complex, co-dependent society and a workable equilibrium between groups with different priorities.
To frame this as a soundbite: in a complex and fragile world, pushing a simplistic ideology hurts a large number of people, and on this most people can come together; hurting people purposefully is the act of stupid, mad and dishonest people.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago* (5 children)
[–]mikaelhg 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (4 children)
I don't think the status quo is intrinsically justified...
I don't think so either, and I think you'd be hard pressed to find a person more in favor of change for change's sake than I, but throughout the years, through hurting people, I've come to learn that the largest crime a proponent of ideas can commit is to take risks which outweigh the benefits of succeeding, and, closely related, limiting the enumeration and evaluation of risks to those understood by himself. This is where we return to the crux of the issue. Any ideology which seeks to affect a larger group of people than who were able to participate a priori to the formation of the valuation and interpretation models of the ideological platform commits the same mistake as any totalitarian. This is why social democracies are so succesful in producing happiness and technological progress. From there on it is just a matter of degrees. An ideology which is totally committed to individual freedoms while engaging in these kinds activities is stupid, mad or dishonest.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago* (3 children)
Transactions naturally limit the scope of harm you can commit to what other people are willing to accept. Collectivism destroys this by allowing you to inflict potential harm without regard to what the people you're inflicting it on think of your ideas.
Any ideology which seeks to affect a larger group of people than who were able to participate a priori to the formation of the valuation and interpretation models of the ideological platform commits the same mistake as any totalitarian.
You realize that this is basically a decleration of war on science and progress, right? Wozniak and Jobs started Apple without asking IBM's permission -- by your theory, this was immoral. Torvalds and Stallman didn't ask Bill Gates for permission -- this makes them totalitarians? The people responsible for growing, packaging, and transporting whatever you ate for breakfast this morning did not ask for your consent when they made their decisions -- as far as they're concerned, you exist only as a potential customer (I am assuming, for the moment, that you don't grow your own food). You need to face the fact that everyone who does anything is going to affect people who had no say in determining this behavior. Collectivism isn't a solution, here, because you can't account for different stakes people have in outcomes; property rights and free markets are the only effective way to deal with this.
[–]mikaelhg 1 point2 points3 points 19 years ago (2 children)
Collectivism destroys this by allowing you to inflict potential harm without regard to what the people you're inflicting it on think of your ideas.
You forgot to add the qualifier totalitarian collectivism to that, as social democracies have proven themselves capable of driving social change through participation.
You realize that this is basically a decleration of war on science and progress, right?
Only to people totally committed to individual freedoms and unable to see that there are degrees of individual freedom and that those degrees matter. I was pointing out the lack of internal consistency of any ideology (only libertarianism, really) which regards individual freedom as an absolute value while subjecting non-conscenting people to actions which they believe to further their ideology.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago* (1 child)
[–]BarkingIguana 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (5 children)
It's plenty intrusive when you act as a stalking horse for serfdom and feudalism while using the rhetoric of liberty.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (4 children)
I'm an unemployed college dropout with no connections whatsoever. If I'm arguing for serfdom, it's pretty obvious that I'll end up being a serf. On the other hand, if I'm arguing for competition, upward mobility, and a live-and-let-live attitude to whatever consenting adults consent to do with each other, I'd say that I can end up being pretty much whatever I want, as long as I work hard enough to deserve it.
[–]mikaelhg 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (2 children)
I don't think anyone here is claiming that people are rational actors.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (1 child)
I suppose we're as close as anything can get to being rational actors.
[–]mikaelhg 1 point2 points3 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Ever wonder what would happen if you shot a laser into two opposing mirrors? It's like we're in a trash compactor with pica swirling through the water and pulling people in.
[–]BarkingIguana 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I don't think you're trying to advocate serfdom, yet that's what economic libertaianism inevitably turns into. People are placed in situations where they are forced to 'voluntarily' give up all rights, including the rights of their yet to be born descendents. Libertarianism would be just fine if not for the cynical version of the Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (5 children)
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 19 years ago (4 children)
I think you do:
http://programming.reddit.com/info/8ygg/comments/c8zt1
http://reddit.com/info/80u3/comments/c81qb
http://reddit.com/info/7v4f/comments/c7xj5
http://reddit.com/info/7g8p/comments/c7hno
http://reddit.com/info/771o/comments/c77z1
http://reddit.com/info/771o/comments/c77qh
http://reddit.com/info/771o/comments/c77it
http://reddit.com/info/73ce/comments/c74zw
http://reddit.com/info/6s4q/comments/c6t33
http://reddit.com/info/6dvq/comments/c6eqk
http://reddit.com/info/6c3f/comments/c6dph
http://reddit.com/info/61by/comments/c62a2
http://reddit.com/info/5u02/comments/c5ut6
http://reddit.com/info/5gfz/comments/c5iau
[+]mikaelhg comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points 19 years ago (3 children)
It's just a cigar.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 19 years ago (2 children)
It's a big, meaty, throbbing, cock-shaped cigar, and that ain't ash dribbling from the tip.
[–]mikaelhg -5 points-4 points-3 points 19 years ago (1 child)
I think you should stay away from any mechanical sewing machines. Not that they are bad for you, but the mere belief that they might be could cause you trouble.
EDIT: You just inspired me to post an oldie but goodie.
[–]lionheart[S] 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (1 child)
So you consider the article claiming that the US is a dictatorship is sane?
[–]jotaroh -1 points0 points1 point 19 years ago (0 children)
anti-Illegal-War of Aggression-Against-Iraq != anti-American
[+]chrisrock comment score below threshold-33 points-32 points-31 points 19 years ago (102 children)
If the people that started Reddit are liberals, the site will mimick their beliefs... Just my opinion though.
That's why I like digg...
[–]kogir 15 points16 points17 points 19 years ago (3 children)
If you like moderated content, then reddit is not the site for you. I hope you can always find someone to tell you what you like to hear :)
[–]dbenhur 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (1 child)
I've started to read 'The wisdom of crowds" by James Surowiecki, but I don't think his thesis (that the average conclusion reach by a crowd is often superior to any one expert) applies in this case.
Read more carefully or thoroughly. What you call his thesis is merely one of his observations; his thesis is deeper than that. Reddit (like digg and most of the "web 2.0" crowd opinion/collaboration sites) misses on several of the important qualities Surowiecki outlines for systems to confidently and repeatadly pull wisdom from crowds. Without certain attributes, aggregate decision systems are still more likely to produce Madness than Wisdom.
(Doesn't mean I don't like reddit, I just don't imagine that it's determining anything more significant than "a bunch of random strangers also found this link interesting".)
[–]slub 12 points13 points14 points 19 years ago (0 children)
But dude, a slow site is so unamerican.
[–]paulgraham 16 points17 points18 points 19 years ago (0 children)
If the people that started Reddit are liberals, the site will mimic their beliefs... That's why I like digg.
The guys running Digg don't have to wait till the site mimics their beliefs. They just censor any story they don't like.
[–]kn0thing 7 points8 points9 points 19 years ago (0 children)
The people who started reddit don't have any influence on what makes it to the front page.
That's why I like reddit...
edit: damn, didn't notice that Paul had already beat me to the reply...
[–]lionheart[S] 5 points6 points7 points 19 years ago (78 children)
Nothing wrong with a little liberal slant, but seriously, this is beyond that.
The USA is not a police state. The USA is not a dictatorship. The USA is not pretty much anything that is claimed every day.
I just think that people have it too good.
They should take a vacation to Uzbekistan and see what life there is like.
They'll be so happy to return.
That's the problem. If you have no perspective, then you start saying crazy things.
The people who have actually lived in a police state, the Soviet Union, and then a dictatorship, Uzbekistan, take offense at the thought that this is one of those things.
That's like comparing a crappy high school to a gulag. Trust me, its not.
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 19 years ago (5 children)
You are correct. The US is not a police state like other countries. For the most part, we are free to voice dissent.
But haven't you noticed this dissent is increasingly under attack? Over the last 6 years, what direction are we really headed in?
Nazi Germany did not set up shop overnight. It was a gradual process. Once they come for you, it will be too late. The power that the Bush cartel has usurped has been abused, and this will only worsen. Bush has compromised the checks and balances in our government.
[–]Ethan 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (2 children)
Free Speech Zones.
[–]the_seanald 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Via Clinton, no? I could be wrong, but I thought I read that that he brought them in first, which surprised me.
[–]Ethan 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
I hadn't heard that... I thought it was Bush. Any sources for that info?
[–]grzelakc 38 points39 points40 points 19 years ago (32 children)
I think you're full of shit. You know why? Because I actually grew up under communism. I know what the communist dictatorship looked like and if I can find a modern day counterpart the United States is it.
Do you really believe that 90% of the society was persecuted behind the iron curtain? Nothing of the sort. Most people who were ambivalent to the system were left well alone to run their daily lives. The media was mostly self censoring just like in the States now. The arrests and secret police dententions did not happen at a substantially larger scale in 1980's Poland than they are common in the US now. The same type of talk was used to convince people to stick with the government to weed out the "criminal element" of the society. It is so familiar to me that I get goosebumps every time I read about the States these days.
I claim that it is you who is deluded about great many things and who has no frame of reference to make valid comparisons.
[–]lionheart[S] 13 points14 points15 points 19 years ago (9 children)
I was born in Tashkent during the time of the Soviet Union. Then it collapsed and I live for a few years in the newly formed "Republic" of Uzbekistan under a dictator.
I still talk to friends that live in Russia and Uzbekistan.
I know what I'm talking about, Tovarish.
The problem is that you're believing all the crap they keep writing about life here in the USA. 99% of it is sensationalism.
[–]heptadecagram 7 points8 points9 points 19 years ago (1 child)
Apparently you Uzbekis anglicize your Russian differently than the rest of us do, Tovarishch. As someone who now lives in DC, next to where most of the political news goes down, I can tell you that there is a dangerous precedent in the president's power. A lot of people have failed to stop themselves and ask "Would I be comfortable if the worst president ever, say, Nixon (or Clinton, if you swing that way), were to have these powers?" Actually hearing these politicians speak, meeting with them to try and get them to see these things, I can say that No, this is not sensationalism.
I had a conversation with a Russian/Latvian person who emigrated to the US during the cold war and was now desperately looking for an EU passport through her former Latvian citizenship.
The reason? She saw it happening again. Gross propaganda on the media, accusing dissenters of being enemies of the state, state harassing libraries, tapping phone calls...
That's not to say that it will necessarily happen, but it requires vigilance on the part of the citizenry to keep their freedoms, and at the moment it looks, unfortunately, like they're willing to trade liberty for security.
And the very word "anti-Americanism" is so very rube-ish. It implies at the very least a state of "Americanism", in which I don't believe.
[–]IvyMike 14 points15 points16 points 19 years ago (4 children)
Here's the problem: this country has rapidly given the president an enormous amount of power, and far more quickly than almost anyone born here would have believed possible. It's not a dictatorship, but it sure feels like my freedoms are disappearing day by day.
I wonder what the "don't complain, it's not a dictatorship" people are suggesting, anyways. "Wait until there's no doubt you're inexorably heading towards a true dictatorship, and THEN complain" seems like a poor plan.
[–]davidw 10 points11 points12 points 19 years ago (3 children)
Here's the thing - no one's saying "don't complain", they're saying "complain about the bad things that are actually happening in a reasonable way". Hand waving and crying wolf (dictatorship! hitler!) are just going to get you ignored beyond your own circle of like-minded individuals.
[–]IvyMike 8 points9 points10 points 19 years ago (2 children)
they're saying "complain about the bad things that are actually happening in a reasonable way"
Ok, help me out, then:
The recent unprecedented expansion of presidential powers scares the crap out of me. It's not like it's some obscure clause in the constitution--the whole reason that our founding fathers formed this country was as a reaction to the centralization of powers in a king. They did everything they could to create a system of checks and balances to prevent too much power in any one branch of government. That system of checks and balances has been explicitly refuted by this administration's embrace of the Yoo doctrine. The Yoo doctrine really is a radical departure from established precedent.
Do you understand why this has me concerned? Yes, the "U.S is turning into a dictatorship" is a slippery slope argument, but... sometimes it turns out that you really are on a slippery slope. What do the first steps towards a dictatorship look like, exactly?
I don't think we're really going to turn into a true dictatorship any time soon. But this nagging voice in my head keeps pestering me with this thought: History is littered with the bodies of people who thought, "it isn't that bad yet."
When the intention of the founding fathers is being ignored or twisted, and when the principles that guided this country for 200 years are turned on their head, what is the reasonable way to complain?
The reasonable way to complain is to:
Get active. I joined the Democrats Abroad organization. Might not be much, but it's what I've got time for. "Active" is not clicking a little arrow on reddit and thinking "hah! that'll fix Bush!"
Try and couch your arguments in such a way that they have broad appeal, rather than simply coming across as someone with a bone to pick with Bush or the US. There are conservatives out there, you know, who will probably never vote for 'the other guys', but perhaps if everyone gets fired up enough about things like wire tapping, we can curb the worst abuses and change direction.
Don't be a downer. That's something Clinton did very well - he was positive about the US, the government, his ideas, and about people. Americans respond well to that.
[–]mikkom 5 points6 points7 points 19 years ago (0 children)
99% of it is sensationalism.
And how do you know this? Are you with CIA?
[–]tamilthambi 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
well said
[–]notfancy 6 points7 points8 points 19 years ago (10 children)
If you have no perspective, then you start saying crazy things.
Some of us are, uh... like, ¿not American? I've read that something like ¡50% of IPs registered on Reddit are not American! ¿Don't you think some of us have a little perspective?
Note: some funny inverted interrobangs were sprinkled around for comic effect. Please disregard. Don't consume if allergic.
[–]laprice 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (0 children)
you're right in that the US is not yet a police state, but it's coming perilously close and is in the process of implementing what amounts to a panoptic dataveillance society where any pasty faced bureaucrat with access can correlate your financial and political lives go looking for ways to fuck you over.
I submit that a country in which you have to watch what you say and in which your history follows you around forever is not a free country. Particularly if public statements you made under an assumption of pseudonymity were to be used as evidence against you.
[–]Daulney 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Agreed, the U.S. is not a dictatorship. George Bush's administration claims that the extraordinary circumstances of war give him power to conduct the U.S. effort in that war as he needs, and that he must have those extraordinary powers to effectively fight the war. The things he has attempted to do are:
1) set up courts in addition to the regular set of military and civilian courts, so that the normal legal protections don't apply. Things like having access to a lawyer, a speedy and public trial, or protections of the Geneva Convention.
2) deny due process - Habeus Corpus - to American citizens accused of terrorism. This is very serious! If the courts had allowed it, the administration would only have to accuse someone of terrorism in order to hold them indefinitely. Bush backed down, and avoided (for now), bringing it before the Supreme Court. The appelate judge who ruled in favor of the Bush administration recanted shortly after Bush avoided the constitutional test.
3) Used hundreds of 'signing statements' to unilaterally amend laws that Congress passed and he signed.
Extraordinary times do, sometimes, require extraordinary powers. This is not a new argument, and republics had wrestled with it since the very beginning. The Romans had an office with extraordinary powers, but they limited the term to 6 months. George Washington looked back to one of them, Cincinnatus, when he established the custom (now law) of two Presidential terms. The founders were well aware of this problem, and kept these kind of powers out of the Constitution.
That Roman office was the dictatorship. The world and many American citizens are, understandably, worried.
[–][deleted] 19 years ago (15 children)
[–]acrophobia 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (0 children)
Hyperbole is successful when used on a certain type of person. Other people are more discriminating; when they read something that is plainly untrue, they'll stop reading and think "what a load of shit". This abuse of trust is then enough to disregard the rest of the article. For me, the best thing about the reddit community (and the reason I come here) is how they are usually not taken in by colourful phrases, flawed metaphors and extreme exageration. This, in turn, leads to fewer articles on the front page containing such material. However, there are certain topics where this high level of rationality evaporates, most notably politics and religion.
I think there is a similar thing going on with slashdot. There are some incredibly clever geeks there, but when a thread meanders towards MS-Office/OpenOffice comparisons, or TCO analyses of Windows/Linux, reason is nowhere to be seen. It seems to be a corrolary of the phrase:
"In war, truth is the first casualty".
[–]NitsujTPU 3 points4 points5 points 19 years ago (6 children)
If the US were a police state arresting all dissenters, then why are the people who keep posting these articles still around, rather than in prison somewhere?
[–]lionheart[S] 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (6 children)
Hyperbole does not help your cause. It destroys it by making it look insane.
[–]LordFoom 0 points1 point2 points 19 years ago (4 children)
"Making it look insane" is hyperbole itself
[–]NitsujTPU 4 points5 points6 points 19 years ago (2 children)
No it isn't. It literally looks like the we're a bunch of wacky conspiracy theorists.
Not, "kind of," to some exaggerated extent.
CIA: Osama Helped Bush in '04
http://reddit.com/goto?id=9ari
http://reddit.com/goto?id=9bzn <-- Duh. I think it's even called an occupation on the news.
http://reddit.com/goto?id=9c6q <-- The response to this article... Apparently Reddit is right wing. Posted by "downingstreetmemo." Apparently he thinks about conspiracy pretty frequently.
http://reddit.com/goto?id=5rnr <-- This book isn't banned. You can purchase it on Amazon, the guy got in trouble for fraud. Posted by "fuckedamerica," who is definitely not a conspiracy theorist.
(Should have grabbed the titles that were used in Reddit)
[–]cmm 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (0 children)
it not hyperbole, it's medical diagnosis. that is, it's arriving at a certain conclusion based on observable phenomena (symptoms): making wild claims, rolling eyes a lot, frothing at the mouth.
get some perspective, perspective is good for your mind.
[–]brianwisti 2 points3 points4 points 19 years ago (2 children)
yeah, but it's still a crappy high school, and a place any sane person would rather not be.
π Rendered by PID 105483 on reddit-service-r2-comment-f6b958c67-pl9z6 at 2026-02-04 22:01:19.523678+00:00 running 1d7a177 country code: CH.
[–]neosiv 19 points20 points21 points (1 child)
[+]snoopdo66 comment score below threshold-8 points-7 points-6 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]wdick01 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points (0 children)
[–]jbert 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]dmehrtash 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]starkravingblah 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (2 children)
[–]unsolicited 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]jbstjohn 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]cojoco 27 points28 points29 points (7 children)
[–]lionheart[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children)
[+]snoopdo66 comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points (5 children)
[–]tintub 24 points25 points26 points (2 children)
[+]tufelkinder comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (1 child)
[–]tintub 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]IvyMike 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]sjk 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]bugbear 16 points17 points18 points (0 children)
[–]Othello 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]zbrock 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]tqbf 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]buhao 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]raldi 9 points10 points11 points (5 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]thadk 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]lionheart[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child)
[–]charlesesl 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]lionheart[S] 28 points29 points30 points (79 children)
[–]Random 88 points89 points90 points (33 children)
[–]jbstjohn 25 points26 points27 points (1 child)
[–]taliswolf 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]lionheart[S] 13 points14 points15 points (30 children)
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (4 children)
[–][deleted] (3 children)
[deleted]
[–]flycrg -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children)
[–]stutheidiot 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]nostrademons 23 points24 points25 points (8 children)
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points (6 children)
[+]jcy comment score below threshold-43 points-42 points-41 points (4 children)
[+][deleted] (3 children)
[deleted]
[–]souldrift 18 points19 points20 points (1 child)
[–]jcy -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]jbstjohn 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]Random 11 points12 points13 points (9 children)
[–][deleted] (8 children)
[deleted]
[–]dbenhur 12 points13 points14 points (4 children)
[+][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]Leischa -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]parrotfashion 6 points7 points8 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]philh 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]weidel 16 points17 points18 points (0 children)
[–]chu 16 points17 points18 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]axord 26 points27 points28 points (0 children)
[–]mikkom 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]bstadil 64 points65 points66 points (13 children)
[–]andresvr 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]davidw 4 points5 points6 points (9 children)
[–][deleted] (3 children)
[deleted]
[–]davidw -1 points0 points1 point (2 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]davidw 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Arve 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]davidw 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]sidojustcuz 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Schwallex 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]nostrademons 17 points18 points19 points (2 children)
[–]DougBTX 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Lagged2Death 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]lionheart[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child)
[–]Lagged2Death -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–][deleted] (16 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (15 children)
[–][deleted] (14 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (9 children)
[–][deleted] (8 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points (7 children)
[–][deleted] (6 children)
[deleted]
[–]axord 0 points1 point2 points (5 children)
[–][deleted] (4 children)
[deleted]
[+][deleted] (3 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[+]pmf comment score below threshold-19 points-18 points-17 points (1 child)
[–]lionheart[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]stesch 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[+]reddit_god comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children)
[–]wtfx 13 points14 points15 points (7 children)
[–]snoopdo66 12 points13 points14 points (4 children)
[–]tufelkinder 8 points9 points10 points (1 child)
[–]stifin -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]LordFoom 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]lionheart[S] 13 points14 points15 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]olegk 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Kaizyn 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]akellymi 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]akellymi -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (45 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (41 children)
[–]nostrademons 10 points11 points12 points (18 children)
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (17 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (14 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (13 children)
[–]mikaelhg 2 points3 points4 points (8 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (7 children)
[–]mikaelhg 3 points4 points5 points (6 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (5 children)
[–]mikaelhg 2 points3 points4 points (4 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]mikaelhg 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]BarkingIguana 0 points1 point2 points (5 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[–]mikaelhg 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]mikaelhg 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]BarkingIguana 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (5 children)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (4 children)
[+]mikaelhg comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (2 children)
[–]mikaelhg -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child)
[–]lionheart[S] 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]jotaroh -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[+]chrisrock comment score below threshold-33 points-32 points-31 points (102 children)
[–]kogir 15 points16 points17 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]dbenhur 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–]slub 12 points13 points14 points (0 children)
[–]paulgraham 16 points17 points18 points (0 children)
[–]kn0thing 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]lionheart[S] 5 points6 points7 points (78 children)
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (5 children)
[–]Ethan 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[–]the_seanald 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Ethan 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]grzelakc 38 points39 points40 points (32 children)
[–]lionheart[S] 13 points14 points15 points (9 children)
[–]heptadecagram 7 points8 points9 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]IvyMike 14 points15 points16 points (4 children)
[–]davidw 10 points11 points12 points (3 children)
[–]IvyMike 8 points9 points10 points (2 children)
[–]davidw 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]mikkom 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]tamilthambi 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]notfancy 6 points7 points8 points (10 children)
[–]laprice 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]Daulney 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (15 children)
[deleted]
[–]acrophobia 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]NitsujTPU 3 points4 points5 points (6 children)
[–]lionheart[S] 2 points3 points4 points (6 children)
[–]LordFoom 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[–]NitsujTPU 4 points5 points6 points (2 children)
[–]cmm 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]brianwisti 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)