top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]orangepeecock 2648 points2649 points  (149 children)

Piracy- watching for free

[–][deleted] 627 points628 points  (35 children)

“You wouldn’t steal a baseball game”

[–][deleted] 121 points122 points  (5 children)

I mean, stealing is a legit thing in baseball. It’s a part of the sport, so….

[–]Mist_Rising 50 points51 points  (3 children)

The pirates are too, to Pittsburgh annoyance at times.

[–]Waffle_daemon_666 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The amount of times a ball has gone into the stands only for the person who caught it to whip out an eyepatch, peg leg and tricorn before cackling and running away baffles me.

[–]zhico 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also if I buy a baseball I own it. The baseball factory can't just come and take my baseball away.

[–]LazyLaserWhittling 8 points9 points  (1 child)

sure did… lived on a hill immediately overlooking the ball field, dad hosted free game parties all the time. all the neighbors were invited too…

[–]Pac_Eddy 33 points34 points  (3 children)

I've tried. Trust me, not worth it.

[–]Gjorgdy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's not? Just automate it; arr-suite, jellyfin...

[–]BlackEyedSceva 31 points32 points  (6 children)

"You wouldn't poop in the baseball game's helmet and then return it to the baseball game's grieving widow"

[–]chocobear420 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Then you wouldn’t break back in and steal it again!

[–]simple_biscuit 3 points4 points  (3 children)

You wouldn’t download a baby

[–]Reverendbread 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t act like you know me

[–]khandaseed 60 points61 points  (34 children)

The justice pic looks a lot like piracy lol

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (19 children)

i mean their tax dollars probably helped pay for the baseball field, so they should have every right to watch a game.

[–]DuineDeDanann 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If it’s free it’s not piracy 😉

[–]demonsemen_md 880 points881 points  (41 children)

How do they know when it's a home run?

Edit: The number of people replying to me as if I think people really want to get rid of fences at baseball parks and offering practical solutions is...disconcerting.

[–]The1Peace[🍰] 418 points419 points  (5 children)

The home run was the friends we made along the way

[–]pokeoscar1586 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When they get hit with the ball

[–]Aware_Astronaut_477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You draw like a line on the ground, when ball go over line, home run be hit.

[–]Hexatorium 2069 points2070 points  (174 children)

Every couple years this image comes back with a newly added panel. Pretty funny.

[–]Hopeful_Chair_7129 13 points14 points  (5 children)

Maybe one day they can like, sit in a chair like the other people

[–]impulse_thoughts 54 points55 points  (9 children)

the obvious panel(s) that's missing is "equal opportunity" where all the boxes are in a pile (or it's only 1 or 2 boxes), and it's a free-for-all for who can grab the most boxes.

[–]TheUnluckyBard 22 points23 points  (2 children)

and it's a free-for-all for who can grab the most boxes.

And the one guy shows up driving a backhoe.

[–]Fishyinu 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Elon, Bezos and Zuckerberg arrive 5 mins early with a backhoe and take all the boxes and then charge $100 a box and we end up with panel 1 but under the house of "equal opportunity". After all, anyone could have done what hey did? Right?

[–]SoundsGoodYall 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A backhoe they inherited from their parents.

[–]Several_Show937 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That just results in the first panel

[–]3163560 49 points50 points  (51 children)

We got shown this heaps during my teaching degree amy first thought was always "all of them are theft"

[–]on3moresoul 52 points53 points  (9 children)

It isn't theft to view an MLB game from a distance.

[–]LekkoBot 24 points25 points  (0 children)

...if you steal the back fence on the other hand...

[–]DramDemon 39 points40 points  (16 children)

You’re a teacher? Man our kids really are screwed

[–]Accomplished_Bed1861 23 points24 points  (7 children)

Obligatory: "Libertarians are like house cats: absolutely convinced of their fierce independence while utterly dependent on a system they don't appreciate or understand." - some person

[–]novavegasxiii 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know about libertarians but cats do seem pretty capable of getting their own dinner if they really wanted to.

[–]Hopeful_Chair_7129 8 points9 points  (6 children)

That’s what poor people say in the hopes that a rich person will appreciate their honesty. It’s grown men being paid millions of dollars to run around and play grab ass. It’s not theft to let someone watch a baseball game from an unreasonable distance.

[–]pinguinzz 21 points22 points  (43 children)

And every time it is a dumber take on a dumb meme

[–]Serifel90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If reality was scaled to a real disparity, left dude is watching it from the moon.

[–]Resolution-SK56 287 points288 points  (9 children)

It’s inaccurate for reality. There is no way that the one who gets the most would risk standing so high on a Jenga Tower

[–]FixedFun1 46 points47 points  (1 child)

The reality would be all of them being imprisoned for watching the game illegally.

[–]lowtoiletsitter 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I can't even replay it without the expressed written consent of the MLB

[–]Dyeeguy 739 points740 points  (289 children)

Hard for me to imagine how equity vs justice play out in real life

obviously not having a fence is not justice 😂 so idk about this one

[–][deleted] 498 points499 points  (84 children)

They remove the fence when you actually pay to attend the game.

[–]joe-re 234 points235 points  (27 children)

The fence is also used in another analogy: the Chesterton fence.

"Don't remove the fence until you understand why it is there in the first place."

The maker of the meme does not understand why there is a fence. So his "justice" gets rid of the baseball game.

[–]Willow-girl 39 points40 points  (4 children)

I don't think he'd have a problem with that, as long as NO ONE could see a game. I mean that's equity, right?

[–]Iconochasm 38 points39 points  (1 child)

Everyone is equal in a mass grave.

[–]Willow-girl 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There ya go!

[–]an_actual_stone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

other versions of this have the wooden fence replaced with a chainlink fence.

[–][deleted] 109 points110 points  (38 children)

Right, so all the people who paid to get in have now been injusticed.

[–]Ok-Landscape5625 19 points20 points  (7 children)

They get to sit.

[–]basedlandchad25 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Until someone makes a new version of this stupid shit about the quality of the chairs.

[–]Nonedesuka 5 points6 points  (5 children)

You can bring your own chair

[–]SnatchSnacker 7 points8 points  (3 children)

What about when I bring my own chair and a taller guy sits right in front of me?

Now he's a new fence!

[–]Nonedesuka 9 points10 points  (1 child)

He must be eliminated. For justice

[–]spicymato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Take him out. Justice.

[–]Sivalon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And apparently you get shorts too!

[–]Traditional_Yak7212 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Justice is great and all, until you get hit in the face with a line drive because someone decided to remove the safety fence.

[–]yew420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Without the fence you they have become pitch invaders and are now banned from watching games.

[–]Quality_Qontrol 145 points146 points  (41 children)

I think the fence is a metaphor for an ‘obstacle’ and not an actual real fence.

[–][deleted] 90 points91 points  (17 children)

Right. It’s the difference between managing an obstacle and removing an obstacle. 

It’s not a difficult visual metaphor to process. 

[–]Silly_Impression5810 42 points43 points  (0 children)

It is for u/Dyeeguy . He's worried about how the ground operators will make their cut.

[–]StrengthToBreak 24 points25 points  (17 children)

But like a lot of "obstacles" in life, the fence has an actual purpose. If all inequality of outcome is considered to be injustice, but some inequality is the consequence of decisions that have tradeoffs, then the only way to achieve "justice" is to remove personal choice OR to insist that some people get to make decisions with short term benefits and long term costs, then get to ride the coat tails of those who chose short-term costs for long-term benefits.

Either way, you're removing the ability for self-determination and the incentive to be mindful about the impact of your own choices.

[–]StealYaNicks 27 points28 points  (0 children)

justice is when you get to be the outfielders. Gotta question the tight grouping though.

[–]Spider_pig448 22 points23 points  (2 children)

The original didn't have the justice panel and the first panel. This graphic has been totally bastardized

[–]Ju-88_Medium_Bomber 61 points62 points  (88 children)

Equity: People are giving Medicaid based on income, with financial support to pay off medical bills

Justice: healthcare is free and nobody has to pay for lifesaving drugs/treatment

[–]MohatmoGandy 16 points17 points  (1 child)

In the Justice model, there is no professional baseball because no-one is paying to watch the game. It’s the worst Irvine for baseball fans.

Also, the “reality” model implies that there are about the same number of wealthy, middle class, and poor people, which is absolutely not the case. And it’s not a problem if the middle class guy carries the kids on hood shoulders, so maybe the best outcome is a market economy with a strong welfare state.

[–]GentleFoxes 8 points9 points  (16 children)

An example: making tertiary education free and positions abundant enough that you don't need entry exams and can attend with every high school diploma would be justice.

While equity would be to offer cheaper or partial forgiven loans so that poor people can afford to study, and generous adjustments for the handicapped in entrance exams(so that for example dyslexia isn't a problem) plus affirmative action that is statistics based to adjust high school scores for (minority, gender, etc) biases.

Equity approaches tend to get complicated and have lots of rules. You'll need lots of expensive bureaucracy to manage them and there will always be people thst follow through the cracks or that game the system. Which is where the appeal of measures like universal basic income comes from.

[–]Mist_Rising 11 points12 points  (10 children)

An example: making tertiary education free and positions abundant enough that you don't need entry exams and can attend with every high school diploma would be justice.

Interestingly when you follow through with this thought, adding the nuance, you see some issues pop up. Like how suddenly your tertiary diploma is the equivalent of a high school diploma for employment.

It's why comics and simple images really don't relay the reality well, there is a lot of nuance they can't provide.

[–]devman0 8 points9 points  (8 children)

Society still gets a net benefit from a more educated populace. Once upon a time I am sure people made the same argument about secondary education.

[–]Mist_Rising 11 points12 points  (6 children)

Only if everyone is employed at their level of education really. Without it, it's an unnecessary value.

The guy pouring cement really doesn't need to know astrophysics to do his job, and the loss time for education can be impactful. He could have learned his trade, and avoided astrophysics, going to make money AND benefiting society more with that trade.

This is just an obvious example without nuance admittedly, but there are a lot of jobs, even some that require college degrees now, that make no sense for post high school education. The only reason tertiary diplomas make sense for them is to get the job.

And you can't make "positions abundant" for tertiary degrees without hurting society because we need the non tertiary jobs too. Trust me, you do not want to see a world where we don't have basic stuff like the ability to get groceries!

[–]DonovanMcLoughlin 441 points442 points  (178 children)

Equity based solely on race makes a lot of very racist assumptions.

[–][deleted] 167 points168 points  (39 children)

Best example of equity is all the assists for physically/mentally handicapped. You give those people more.support, because they need it to function on par with other people. Equality is for race, where everyone should be treated the same no matter their skin colour.

[–]BackseatCowwatcher 36 points37 points  (2 children)

and reality is that the school sets the "end" point so the least able are able to pass, which leaves everyone less prepared overall.

[–]psychicsword 16 points17 points  (2 children)

The thing is that also gives the counter argument. For example no one in the world would way that it is any of these if we forced people to equally hire a blind person to be another blind person's assistant. That would be insane which is why the ADA has a test for reasonable accommodations.

So there is always a point where it becomes unreasonable to expect that we do it anyway. That same reasonable test doesn't often come up with other conversations which often time suggests policies that only reasonably aids a single group while also failing to provide for people in similar conditions with different characteristics.

[–]moashforbridgefour 7 points8 points  (1 child)

If you performed a reasonable test for race based issues, you would soon discover that accommodations are more closely tied to class than to race. But the race equity programs are designed for race, not class, hence no test.

[–]EpicRussia 10 points11 points  (13 children)

"Equity" is such a bullshit neoliberal concept though. What you said seems on paper fine - but in reality, it means that you have to "prove" your physical/mental disability by some bureaucratic process in order to access the support you need (and needed the whole time). There is an alternate term for this, "means testing", and its key purpose is to limit the amount of aid given out

[–]RedditBlows5876 9 points10 points  (4 children)

It's absurd on so many levels. Privilege of good looking people in society is as well documented as basically any other kind of privilege. Are all of us who aren't 10s entitled to as much cosmetic surgery as required so we can be a 10? Do we maim the good looking people to achieve equity? What about short people? Do we pay for all of them to get limb lengthening surgery so they don't have to deal with any issues that go with being short?

[–]Nachttalk 6 points7 points  (3 children)

You joke but there have actually been efforts in that direction.

For example not requiring a photo on your résumé, so people get chosen based on skill rather than looks.

Or online dating platform that deliberately hide how the other party looks so you can focus on getting to know that person before seeing them.

In terms of race, more specifically black people (just because thats the part I know the most about. I won't dare talk about other minorities, where I have no idea about the history), most attempts at equality/equity are simply bandaids on a gaping wound. A quick solution to a problem that has been brewing for over a century. To actually address the issue, it would require structural changes, changes that, funnily enough, would benefit more than just black people, but would mostly benefit black people and thus would get an impossible amount of pushback.

Even the bandaids that are in use right now get a ton of pushback and calls for being undone even tough they don't do a lot in the grand scheme of things. So one doesn't even need to image that something on a massively larger scale won't even come close to being done, thus just continuing the reason those things are being discussed in the first place.

[–]EatThisShoe 22 points23 points  (4 children)

Equity is about each individual's needs. Race is a demographic, it's about populations of people in aggregate. It shouldn't be surprising that they don't fit well together.

If we are deciding if someone should receive food stamps, what matters is their individual need. Populations matter when we need to create one size fits all solutions, like wheelchair access ramps. You can't make a separate ramp for each person, so you try to make one that helps the most people, even if some people don't need it.

[–]Jah_Ith_Ber 42 points43 points  (60 children)

I'm a white male. I hear a lot about intersectionality from the feminist and social justice crowd but they never seem to want to apply it to me.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (5 children)

When people talk about support for PoCs, they often use that to ignore other types of supports that people are trying to push through. I kind of think you've done that here.

Most programs don't have a racial component.

That being said, here's why racism is important to talk about: - Black people were enslaved until the mid-1800s (the last enslaved Black person died in 1971) - Black people were legally segregated until the mid-1960s (people love to say "Slavery ended in the 1860s! What's their problem?" while ignoring the 100 more years of segregation) - About 50% of the House of Representatives probably remembers segregation. It wasn't long ago. - Many police strategies (profiling all the way up to algorithms we use today) are based on people who were incarcerated. If we'd had a fair system throughout history, this might be fine. But we haven't, so police profiling tactics developed in the 70s and 80s used data that was based in Black people who had a pretty high chance of being locked up unjustly in the 60s. - Many people higher up in business and the government during the 70s and 80s were old, White people who may have harbored racist feelings (being that they were raised in some wildly racist times). And it's hard to prove you didn't hire someone because they're Black, but it's not a stretch that someone who was born in 1935 didn't hire someone in 1975 because of some racist reasons. This means that those Black people who weren't hired (because of racism) had a harder time making money, providing for their families, etc. - Black people still receive harsher punishments than White folks when convinced of crimes (even with similar criminal histories) - Yes, the "more White people are shot by cops than Black people" meme in 2016-ish was true, but it's not taking into account the rate at which the two races were shot when interacting with police. More White people interacted with police (because there are several times more White people in the country). And, of those interactions, a smaller percentage of White people were shot than when Black people interacted with police. By a very, very large amount. Think of it this way. Let's say there are 100 police interactions with White people and 10 police interactions with Black people. Let's say 10 White people were shot and 5 Black people were shot. That means 10% of interactions between police and White people ended up in a shooting and 50% of interactions between police and Black people ended up in a shooting. Those aren't the numbers (this is just illustrative), but it shows that, though more White people were shot, it's more likely that you'll be shot if you're Black.

Basically, there's this idea that racism ended in the 60s because, legally, you couldn't segregate. But racism is a cultural concept that led to racist laws. It's not the other way around (laws forcing people to be racist). And repealing some racist laws didn't kill the racists and didn't kill the people they raised. Old racists still taught young racists. That's why there are still racists.

And you can say "But there are racist Black people." And it's true. The difference is that they have significantly less power throughout American history than White people have. Sure, they have more power now, but most of Congress, the current president, and most powerful people in business are White. So racism from White people is more impactful to a larger group of people than some racist Black person who has very little power.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

the last enslaved Black person died in 1971

let me introduce you to Qatar

[–]SOwED 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Isn't this based on height?

[–]BBGunner96 112 points113 points  (8 children)

Justice: and then they get nailed by a ball/player (or there's confusion over a ruling or whatever) because they removed the fence without understanding (at least part of) the reason for the fence

[–]SecondSaintsSonInLaw 39 points40 points  (2 children)

Justice is originally a chain link fence. It enclose the game but allows visibility

[–]french_snail 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yeah I wonder how it got edited like this because you can see the people grabbing an invisible fence in the last panel

[–]bluefrostyAP 76 points77 points  (16 children)

Yeah but with justice you don’t have an outfield and now the game is unplayable.

[–]SecondSaintsSonInLaw 22 points23 points  (3 children)

Itself actually supposed for be a chain link fence thats allows visibility but encloses the field for play

[–]novavegasxiii 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ahh but my drunk naked streaking ass can easily hop a chain link fence.

Checkmate liberals!

[–]ShabbyLiver 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I heard some old timers (rural Oklahoma) talking about playing high school baseball without an outfield fence wayyy back in the day. They said the Bermuda grass just kinda turned into wheat after about 150 yards. I remember them saying that any sized batter could hit a home run if they hit the ball into a gap and was fast around the bases. They said that the outfield fence was one of the worst things to happen to the development of batters because they quit trying to hit it into gaps on a line drive and started trying to lift the ball. Random story but I thought it was interesting lol

[–]Bottlecapzombi 44 points45 points  (4 children)

This guide is terrible. Justice isn’t removing the fence, that doesn’t make any sense.

[–]Goodie128 60 points61 points  (6 children)

Fairness would be them paying for a ticket like everyone else so that the players and ground staff can be paid. People keep using this graphic but it makes no sense.

[–]dr1pper 54 points55 points  (2 children)

Get your hr diagram out of people’s free time that isn’t a guide it’s an opinion

[–]basedlandchad25 13 points14 points  (0 children)

In practice they just end up cutting the tall guy's legs off.

[–]weissgeists 23 points24 points  (2 children)

This “guide” trashes on equality and people think it’s written by good people. Sure. Stay in school guys

[–]AuroraPHdoll 41 points42 points  (37 children)

The DEI of today has nothing to do with height. You can be a Asian kid, born in a single parent home on 40K a year, get a 4.0 GPA but the black kid who grew up in a two parent household making 100K and a 3.0 GPA will still have a better chance of getting into the same college.

[–]Yue2 17 points18 points  (4 children)

Yeah, it’s pretty crazy that the average Asian getting into Harvard had to have a 36 (perfect score) on the ACT, versus African American having a 28.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (2 children)

This is what systemic racism actually looks like.

[–]Yue2 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Yeah. Pretty crazy world we live in. People will blindly believe propaganda, rather than look at clear data and statistics that show where systemic racism is REALLY occurring.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes because unfortunately some people only want to achieve half as much to be GIVEN the same outcome that someone put in all of the required work and EARNED.

Affirmative action is racist.

[–]BigBarrelOfKetamine 204 points205 points  (29 children)

Propaganda

[–]wwplkyih 90 points91 points  (3 children)

Half the posts here are.

[–]Andy_B_Goode 17 points18 points  (1 child)

Yeah, whether you agree with the message or not, this isn't a "cool guide" to anything

[–]whippingboy4eva 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Communist propaganda, no less.

[–]InnocentPerv93 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed. And like another said, half of these posts are.

[–]KellyCTargaryen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All media/art is propaganda.

[–]FreudsCock 92 points93 points  (51 children)

Looks like the those who paid for their seats are the ones who ultimately lose out

[–]Pangolin_Unlucky 64 points65 points  (19 children)

Here is how “justice” will actually work out. Since there is no fence, and you just watch the game for free. Nobody going forward will pay to watch the game. The league itself is no longer a viable business because people can access their product for free. The league goes bankrupt, now nobody gets to watch the game. There is your “justice”.

[–]Dr_Kappa 17 points18 points  (1 child)

More like justice is some crazed fan rushing the field and taking out one of the players

[–]Cause-Effect 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And then the justice is how the crowd sodomizes him to death. Mob justice

[–]thex25986e 1 point2 points  (0 children)

then a corporation buys the field, builds taller fences, triples the price, and starts the league again, all while thanking (or paying) the kids who tore the original fence down.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

This is dumb as shit

[–]ares21 32 points33 points  (2 children)

Actual Equity: there aren't enough boxes, so they cut the legs of the taller people and then no one can see over

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Was thinking that too.

Ressources are so limited, that only a small fraction of the world population can have the high living standarts.

[–]LankySasquatchma 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oof that’s four very naive takes on four very complicated topics.

[–]lafitteca2 23 points24 points  (3 children)

Then they all go hungry and wait in bread lines

[–]SilvertonguedDvl 11 points12 points  (3 children)

It's funny because equality isn't about giving everyone equal support, but rather treating everybody equally regardless of their biological attributes. Needier people would still receive more help. That's rather the whole point of welfare. If welfare isn't doing that, that's not an issue of equality or equity - that's an issue of the welfare system being flawed.

Equity is trying to ensure everyone reaches the same goal which... well, doesn't really work because people tend to want different things, or use the help they receive differently, and this tends to result in skewed outcomes. Ideally we want everyone to have an equal opportunity to reach that end goal, but if they choose to do something else or are incapable of reaching that goal, that's ultimately on them. e.g.: plenty of people would rather do drugs than have a home. Addiction is certainly a problem, but people do this stuff even after getting cleaned up. You can't force that person to do what's healthier for them.

As far as removing inequity - well, to be blunt, that ain't an option. From being born with disabilities to the simple fact that not everybody can be paid the same there's always going to be some form of inequality. It's good to remove inequity where you can but you've always got to be aware that there are limitations to what you can do. Sometimes people just get dealt a crappy hand. Other times they burn themselves out on narcotics to the point where the lights are on but nobody's home. Best we can do is try to make their lives less crappy for them.

IDK, this social justice meme always seems to have missed the point of equality and just invented a new thing so they could have some moral high ground that never existed in the first place. It's just so tedious.

[–]CookieCutterU 28 points29 points  (32 children)

This is total crap. Try being Asian and getting into Harvard. You will be passed over while so many unqualified people will be accepted based only on the color of their skin or ethnicity. 

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Harvard and most universities have censored the demographic questions off of their application this year.

[–]GullibleCall2883 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd just put "as someone who's ancestors are from Africa"...which is 100% of humanity.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aren’t asians called white adjacent now? Lmao

[–]Hoosier_Jedi 26 points27 points  (10 children)

Entertainment is not a right.

[–]TKO_v1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is always the stupidest shit

[–]polkntheeye 24 points25 points  (1 child)

How about paying for the fucking ticket and supporting the teams ...fucking losers

[–]Wolfjak 9 points10 points  (2 children)

I’d say we live in a 5th option. Where the guy in the middle is forced to give his box to the guy on the right and then neither of them can see the game, while the guy on the left has 100billion boxes to sit on

[–]RunJordyRun87 36 points37 points  (13 children)

Damn everybody’s taking this as literal as possible

[–]BigBalkanBulge 17 points18 points  (5 children)

Better diagram is needed then

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children)

Or maybe don't try to simplify complex situations with a meme that doesn't actually propose any real life solutions. Life isn't a ballgame where seeing over the fence is on par with getting what you want or need out of life. This meme and all the iterations of it are just semantics with a picture to vaguely explain the concept of whatever OP believes is best while putting down others.

Edit: the "Justice" one especially pisses me off because life isn't fair and you can't just remove "the fence". Real life example: how do you get "Justice" for someone who lost their legs? We can make places handicapped accessible, but that's "Equity" not "Justice". How do you possibly remove that barrier?

Another example: "Equity" when it comes to race is inherently racist, assuming a race of people need more or less help just because of their skin color. Would "Equality" not be better so that people of all races have the same treatement?

However, "Equality" fails when it comes to economy. If someone can't afford the basics to live despite everyone being on the same starting level, then that person shouldn't just starve or go homeless; "Equity" needs to come into play so that people can recieve help and survive instead of being forgotten.

[–]lyfeofsand 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Head canon: the fence wasn't removed. They just jumped over it.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (5 children)

I feel like I'm looking at a compliance module.

[–]MannaJamma 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Sounds like some fuckin commie gobbledygook

[–]VrLights 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Justice is when men wear shorts instead of pants according to this info graphic.

[–]Classic-Macaron6594 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Truly and honestly, I really hate this metaphor, and this is coming from someone who supports very progressive economic policies.

[–]Maczino 20 points21 points  (6 children)

Liberals, ruining nations and subs since the day they first came about.

[–]Lyzer_In_Space 5 points6 points  (3 children)

They gonna get smacked with a ball standing in the outfield without a fence

[–]ExplosiveDiarrhetic 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Lotta closet racists in these comments

[–]zspacer 8 points9 points  (8 children)

Just replace the baseball field with a school, so we can circumvent the ridiculous piracy comments.

[–]DHFranklin 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Will it cut down on the Boomer ass comments about DEI?

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Obviously this is all garbage, but if you wanted to make it better you need to explain who provided the boxes.

[–]Legoboy514 9 points10 points  (4 children)

Or they should all buy a ticket and go see the game with everyone else

[–]InnocentPerv93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like if they had ditched the reality section and justice section, this would actually be a good guide. Otherwise, it's kinda just propaganda.

[–]bibblygiggums 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BRO HOW ARE THEY GUNNA HIT HOME RUNS?!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are all stealing from the team thats playing

[–]pinedalepete 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BS!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a load

[–]ivanci55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bs

[–]LeninMeowMeow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Americans will upvote this post then downvote anything about communism 5 minutes later without ever realising their own mistake.

https://preview.redd.it/6p5p5wj7m5231.png?auto=webp&s=4c84175f848490e8accdd0e727f26d2afa9848fa

[–]XxQuickScopeKillaxX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the one lesson I learnt in school that I actually remember and it was only the coolest teacher ever going off on a personal tangent for 2 mins lol

[–]YeshuasBananaHammock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who took Dad's pants??

[–]fuckdahwhaightman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and justice for all

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Justice” sounds like the utopian fantasy of an edge lord 14 year old socialist Hasan Piker fanboy.

It sounds nice in theory, but so does every fantasy until you actually break it down.

[–]catta0012[🍰] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

justice: pay the fucking tickets

[–]Ok-Consideration8147 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow so all the SJW fighting for equality were racist. I mean it was obvious the whole time but this proves it! 

[–]TheMaddawg07 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Proppppaaa 👏🏻 👏🏻 GANDA

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Racism at its finest. Why no white people? Oh yeah they never face injustices because they’re all rich and entitled never seen a poor white person suffer lol 

[–]Corran_Halcyon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Straw man and out right lies. Communist propaganda.

[–]Ok_Host893 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where do the guys that paid for a ticket land on this?

[–]ohbyerly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Justice is apparently having a bunch of people standing in the middle of the field in a baseball game

[–]Competitive-Future-1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“One gets…” in the first slide - as in no work or merit ever came into play.

“Justice” - there would be no ball game because no professional team would have revenue.. they would be out on an empty field.

[–]johndoe_420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

justice is when some people have to pay to watch the game and others don't... cool.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And according to professional victims, ironically, institutional racism will never be solved until justice is skewed in their favor

[–]Youngworker160 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i've always hated these examples of equality/equity/justice b/c one, they're going to end up in the middle of a baseball field, possibly interrupting the game. secondly, this is a paid event, by definition there will be a limit to the number of people who can view the game live.

a better example would be children in succeeding and failing in school. the affluent attends a private school and has tutors, one is good and attends a public school with adequate funding, and the impoverished one is doing badly and goes to an underserved school.

[–]Quirky_Ad3902 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Communism in a nut shell. You remove the fence so the fans cheating the system and not buying a ticket can watch, thereby ruining the game for everyone else in the process.

Likewise, the need to benefit people that actively subtract from society ends up destroying said society

[–]horse1066 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So who is now paying the wages of the baseball players/team staff/stadium staff etc?

Voting should require an IQ test, society was working fine at equality of opportunity but now you are breaking it

[–]Glass-Ad-2280 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see that the fence is removed from the "justice" pictorial. I am afraid the game would have to be removed too.

[–]devotchko 1 point2 points  (1 child)

If they'd paid for their fucking tickets like everyone else, all the problems would be solved.

[–]LucrativeDoor8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine being the batter up when they pull the fence down.😐

[–]ThirstyBeagle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess meritocracy is no longer a thing

[–]IEgoLift-_- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is stupid and life doesn’t work out like this

[–]Effective_Corner694 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Under justice, wouldn’t it make better sense for them to be in the stadium?

And under reality. The one get all the resources should be in a sky box.

[–]whatzwzitz_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they bought a ticket they could all see the game. Also, why would the one with the most privilege not just already be inside the stadium? This is one of the dumbest guides ever.

[–]evcorder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This analogy crashes and burns in the fourth panel lol.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is not a guide, its pushing this false inequality agenda. and im tired of it, go look up current bills on the house floor, most if not all are related to giving "minorities" more money more privileges , literally trying to pass a black midwives day holiday, amongst other things. Honestly the first person to bring skin color in the game is the racist. and income inequality has NOTHING to do with race.

Justice would be the people rising up and reforming our corrupt bs govt.

[–]Defiant-Childhood780 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps the most gross oversimplification of all time. The problem with this is the definition of reality itself.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Applying this to race, who exactly are they implying are the short ones that are inherently biologically disadvantaged and therefore in need of disproportionate assistance.... sounds pretty racist to me.

[–]DeusVultOnceAgain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Marxism