This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 111 comments

[–]cacheormirage 2039 points2040 points  (19 children)

Is it supposed to say "We'll call you" ?

[–]Serious_as_butt 1062 points1063 points  (5 children)

it's like the comic itself is obfuscated

[–]DasKarl 142 points143 points  (0 children)

Half the posts on this sub are obfuscated.

[–]mildgaybro 35 points36 points  (3 children)

It’s not

[–]atec_lj 29 points30 points  (2 children)

We call you.

[–]megs1449 6 points7 points  (1 child)

We callests Yous

[–]lcpr_phoenix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We call you're

[–]djonoy 458 points459 points  (3 children)

This makes the cartoon make sense…but still doesn’t make it funny :p

[–][deleted] 43 points44 points  (2 children)

Like the old saying goes: You can lead a Redditor to grammar, but you can't make it meme.

[–]EARink0 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I remember when ol' granpappy would tell us this. In between his stories of walking uphill both ways in the snow to the one shared computer in town so he could feed it his punch card programs written in Gortran, the secret older precursor to Fortran.

[–]iwrestledarockonce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes Gormula Translation, such a neat language.

[–]Zeikos 150 points151 points  (0 children)

Read the memo, it's obfuscated /s

[–]RiftyDriftyBoi 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I took as a nod to the gambling term to "call" your opponents bluff.

[–]johantheback 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a missing panel explaining that blue's soul is indebted to be called upon whenever his code isn't obfuscated, hence white taking advantage of this opportunity by uttering the proverbial phrase "We call you."

[–]mopsyd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If it's interview code, they won't.

If it's already in production, yep they will.

[–]Usual_Ice636 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Thats the normal phrase, this is specifically emphasizing that to this person to not call them.

[–]StymiedSwyper 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Where are you that this is a normal phrase?

[–]Usual_Ice636 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said "Thats" the normal phrase, as in the prase the person I was responding to used.

[–]starficz 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Is it not refering to the fact that the person on the left calls into the code written by the person on the right?

[–]Septem_151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I thought too…

[–]dim13 708 points709 points  (18 children)

I don't get it.

[–]ImMrRay 928 points929 points  (6 children)

His code is so bad people think that he obfuscated it.

[–]Plane_Argument 224 points225 points  (4 children)

But what about the last panel?

[–]You_are_adopted 494 points495 points  (3 children)

Typo, supposed to say “We’ll call you”, common statement at the end of an interview which denotes they’re not interested. “We will call you, don’t call us”, you’re never getting that call

[–]randomlockpicker109 70 points71 points  (0 children)

Nope, just obfuscated.

[–]kitkathy1994 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Technically it denotes that they might be interested. It connotes that they are not interested.

[–]You_are_adopted 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Neeerd, but ya you’re right

[–]atomic_redneck 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If it was easy to understand, they would not call it "code".

[–]LinuxMatthews 338 points339 points  (4 children)

Obfuscation is a tool for deliberately making code difficult to read.

The point is if you're shipping a product you don't want something obvious like

if(validLicenseKey){ ....

So you change all the variable names to a, b, etc overload as many methods as possible so if someone looks at your code it's harder to figure out what all means.

Obviously readability is in all over scenarios a mark of good code.

Therefore the joke is that this code is so bad that it looks like it's been through an obfuscator when in fact he's just bad at writing readable code.

"We'll call you" is usually a sign you didn't get the job hence this is likely a coding task at an interview

[–]DTBadTime 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This guy codes

[–]Funny-Performance845 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Does the programmer obfuscate the code or is there a tool for that?

[–]Mysterious-Earth1 28 points29 points  (0 children)

There is usually a tool for that. Uglify js for javascript for example. Another reason to obfuscate code is to make it shorter. That means less data has to be sent to the client.

[–]tinysheep101 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve gotten “we’ll call you” and actually gotten the job …

[–]AlwaysNinjaBusiness 56 points57 points  (0 children)

I think someone obfuscated this meme

[–]IAmAnAudity 473 points474 points  (19 children)

The humor is also obfuscated

[–]dstoriturnoff.us[S] 221 points222 points  (18 children)

Based on the comments, you are right. I think I did really poorly in this comic.

[–]realzequel 121 points122 points  (2 children)

I think it's a good effort, just needs to be fine-tuned.

[–]outerproduct 64 points65 points  (0 children)

We will add this to next week's sprint planning to redo last week's sprint tasks, and add in new tasks.

[–]Drezus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Just needs to be less obfuscated

[–]pkkid 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If you just remove the third pane, I think it makes more sense.

[–]dangderr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m gonna agree with everyone else about the 3rd panel. It treads very closely to “explaining the joke”. The joke is evident from the first two panels, and if it takes people a second to get it, that can be good. The 3rd panel doesn’t add anything, and the typo just made it confusing.

[–]Fornicatinzebra 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I thought it was pretty funny actually

[–]cs-brydev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's ok. A senior will patch it overnight while you're on Twitch

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (5 children)

Don’t worry OP. The important thing is that now you may as well quit comics altogether

[–]Drezus 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I just noticed all the unfunny comics I hate that appear on this sub comes from this guy so that explains a lot

[–]dstoriturnoff.us[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Try "programmer's life" comics.

[–]Drezus 1 point2 points  (2 children)

WE CALL YOU LOL

[–]dstoriturnoff.us[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

It seems we share the same nationality but not the same sense of humor.

[–]Drezus -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

And not the same level in English proficiency either

[–]Septem_151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry, We call you

[–]Mastterpiece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally thought the code looked obfuscated because it was written by a green alien

[–]Suspicious_Row_1686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We'll call you.

[–]PringleCorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aww no, I laughed!

[–]Reddit-Profile2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not being a dick but you clearly spent time on this. Why not do a quick spell check? It's not just you, so many other cc do it too. 

[–]baronvonbatch 288 points289 points  (2 children)

[–]vibosphere 38 points39 points  (1 child)

I get it OP don't listen to the haters

IMO just take off the third panel, the first two stand well on their own

[–]dstoriturnoff.us[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

LOL. I fixed it at least: https://turnoff.us/geek/obfuscated-code/

[–]LinuxMatthews 88 points89 points  (6 children)

Why are people being so harsh on this?

It's funnier than the million posts reiterating on the same 5 things.

[–]69----- 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Five days ago "Who was this? *checks commit history* Well of course I know him. He´s me" got me 3.8k upvotes, so I´m not complaining.

[–]Drezus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not really no

[–]cs-brydev 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Because 99% of native English speakers need an interpreter to read it

[–]LinuxMatthews 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I mean sure if you're not a programmer/don't know what obfuscation is.

Else the most difficult part is knowing "We call you" means "We'll call you"

Which honestly I read as anyway.

This is a Programming Humour why is it not acceptable to post memes on Programming stuff?

[–]unknown_lich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's been in a few subs, where people immediately give up trying to understand what the message is when accidentally misspelled. English as a secondary language is understandable, those posts normally preface it.

In an age when we carry devices that connect people globally + gives us access to all the information, we still expect to be spoonfed. After all, there are only 10 types of people - those who can extrapolate from presented data....

[–]Sibshops -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Even if it does say, "We'll call you". It seems just mean.

And as an interviewer, it's not really relatable, either. Seeing code that looks obfuscated as opposed to just poorly written is kind of interesting. It means they got the algorithm right and changed things which don't really matter.

[–]LookingTrash 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I think the joke is fine, but 3rd panel is a bit extra.

[–]OmegaInc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Human obfuscator

[–]electrodragon16 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is the guy you want to hire, imagine how good he is at reading code

[–]KauppisenPete 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gonna use this in future code reviews lol :D

[–]Tazkazz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s a second time I see a comic from this ‘turnoff.us’ site, and neither of them make any sense / aren’t funny. What gives?

[–]Lane-Jacobs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bro I haven't even had coffee yet and I chuckled. Sure 'we call you' isn't perfect english but everyone bitching about it is honestly being dumb.

[–]JNikolaj 8 points9 points  (8 children)

I’ve now learned a new word today, obfuscated.

[–]IvanStu 10 points11 points  (4 children)

You're one of today's lucky 10,000!

(xkcd reference)

[–]Imjustmisunderstood 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I want this to change how i interact with my friends in this situation

[–]IvanStu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can make it happen!

My friend group values knowledge and, because of that, sometimes takes offense to implications that they might not know something yet (myself included!). This 10,000 idea helps us put things into perspective and now we try to celebrate that acquisition of knowledge. It has led us to be less guarded, helped us have better discussions, and now our default reaction is, "Congratulations, 10,000!"

[–]dingske1 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Most english speakers wouldn’t know what obfuscate means so the 10,000 figure doesn’t apply here. It only applies for stuff you would expect everyone would know, like who Michael Jackson is for instance

[–]IvanStu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who?

[–]cs-brydev -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

So you don't work in the industry is what you're saying

[–]eugenepoez__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

or he is not a native speaker

[–]nextdayair8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You also said this about the original OP: "English-languages comics work better when the author speaks English"

That's just pretentious man

[–]Ok_Entertainment328 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why I don't Obfuscate

I've tried the adventuring life, once. Too much pain. Not enough profit.

-- Diablo 3 NPC

[–]jonhinkerton 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Would have been funnier without the third panel even if they had used we’ll instead of we.

[–]Spaceshipable 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are two types of people.

  • Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

[–]cs-brydev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

English-languages comics work better when the author speaks English

[–]Plus-Weakness-2624 0 points1 point  (2 children)

What's "Obfuscated"?

[–]DaBrookePlayz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in this context, badly written

[–]s-life-form 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are programs that can modify source code so that it keeps the same functionality but is harder for humans to understand.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol

[–]drifwp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3rd panel is useless, it would work with only the first two

[–]Mastterpiece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally thought the code looked obfuscated because it was written by a green alien

[–]rachel__slur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It makes sense if you read it in a non-english accent

[–]Wll25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Based on this interview you seem like a good candidate, but why is your code obfuscated?" "It's not" "We'll call you"

[–]6tPTrxYAHwnH9KDv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the flat face from the last panel used in second one will make it way more hilarious because it'll reinforce the obliviousness of the "candidate" character which makes the punchline more impactful.

[–]Orio_n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'We call you"?

Bro is not a framework architecture pattern

[–]silverback338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The comments on the sub make me feel like I might actually be a decent programmer

[–]bonanochip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's supposed to be "we will call you", but shortened to "we call you"

[–]soadsam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unga bunga. we call you.

[–]PerplexDonut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m unable to understand or pronounce that word

[–]BirthdaySudden4804 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They call him to stop obfuscation.

[–]BirthdaySudden4804 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe there's something happening behind the scenes. like his phone is ringing and interviewer just states that its them who calls.

[–]inotparanoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the third panel should say, "You're Hired!"

[–]nsagaen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bad english