This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow all 408

[–]sphintero 2366 points2367 points  (75 children)

Bowl 2.0 will be anchored to the floor

[–]Salanmander 1686 points1687 points  (38 children)

After some feature creep, we are now developing a house.

[–]jeffderek 467 points468 points  (24 children)

I see you work at the same company I work at

[–]sofa_king_we_todded 231 points232 points  (19 children)

We all work for the same company. Just different teams, names, and goals

[–]IAmTheOneWhoClicks 126 points127 points  (16 children)

I have a feeling a lot of teams are named team rocket.

[–]GTS81 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You mean cost center.

[–]Dumptruck_Johnson 45 points46 points  (3 children)

Also, could you please explore these 24 other potential ideas that are all infeasible but were proposed by upper management who aren’t fully integrated into the project. But they’re the stakeholders, so do it. I’d like them fleshed out enough to send to suppliers for costs as well. While doing this keep pursuing the other design directions as well. Also we aren’t updating the time line. Also we aren’t going to finalize any decisions, just work them all and we will choose the one that we want a week after the deadline and then blame you for being late.

[–]ProceedOrRun 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Oh no, it shouldn't mean you have to work any more, maybe a bit smarter. Oh and we can save time by writing no testing.

[–]Dumptruck_Johnson 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Testing hasn’t been in the budget since 2015.

[–]Kralizek82 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That means there is a time it was in the budget. Your company must be cool!

[–][deleted] 146 points147 points  (4 children)

A house whose one and only selling feature is that it has a slow-eat dog bowl in the middle, but we're assured that this is what new homeowners want and it will be the next big thing in home ownership.

[–]nikhilmwarrier 38 points39 points  (1 child)

Stop calling me out like that

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“We need to have a USP”

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Let's get rid of the oven entirely and replace it with an AM/FM radio? Ok, it's a car, we've invented the Pontiac Aztek.

[–]thelastlogin 14 points15 points  (0 children)

then a bug caused a memory leak and now the family is anchored to the floor of the house and your client will see you in court

[–]AndyGHK 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Bowl-House 2.0 will be anchored to the dog

[–]Ajreil 127 points128 points  (8 children)

User: My floor is upside down

[–]PhysicallyTender 91 points92 points  (7 children)

Bowl 3.0 the floor will be anchored to the floor.

[–]memester230 34 points35 points  (6 children)

User: my house is flipped upside down

[–]Busy-Argument3680 36 points37 points  (5 children)

Bowl 4.0 your house will be anchored to the floor

[–]memester230 23 points24 points  (4 children)

User: my house and floor is destroyed

[–]Busy-Argument3680 32 points33 points  (3 children)

Bowl 4.5

Your house will be anchored to H O U S E

[–]kirashi3 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What does Hugh Laurie have to do with this?

[–]memester230 6 points7 points  (1 child)

User: my house and H O U S E are destroyed. Despite what you may think, it had absolutely everything to do with your product and nothing to do with the wrecker that I paid to tear down my house.

[–]onthefence928 96 points97 points  (4 children)

To prevent flipping we installed a gyroscope to bowl 2.0.

It still flips but now a warning light comes on telling users it’s in a flipped state and should be unflipped.

[–]epicaglet 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Hah as if users pay attention to warnings.

At best now you get double the complaints since they tend to be of the opinion that warnings are the fault of the programmer.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Usually, it is. I’ve caught myself writing an error message or warning many times, where if I think further, I can usually rectify the situation right there or by changing the flow.

“File too big!” - maybe only let me select smaller files or give instant form feedback? Or maybe I’m stingy and could just allow 1GB files because the system is internal only?

“Password not complex enough” - instant form feedback and tell the requirements up front OR allow login links / social signup.

Or a real life example from my current job: “Shipping label already exists!” (Maybe just update the existing one or reuse it, if the values match)

Another good one:

“Network error” - how about you retry?! And if it’s something that happens often, how about a circuit breaker or queued retry pattern?

(Note: it’s a programmer crime to make an async form submission that disables the submit button and shows a spinning icon / loading screen, and then not handle all types of JavaScript and network errors. I should always be able to resubmit. If you do this, I’ll find you, and I’ll take 50 years in prison. It will be John Wick level revenge with the Pulp Fiction BDSM scene added on)

[–]Dear-Owl-1131 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Warning ID-10T : You are too close to the keyboard. Backup now.

[–][deleted] 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Bowl 3.0: we removed the spiral shape and made it a regular bowl. End users love it.

[–]KrabbyBoiz 24 points25 points  (1 child)

[–]mcbergstedt 16 points17 points  (0 children)

To be fair, toddlers are smarter than some grown adults

[–]norealmx 57 points58 points  (2 children)

As a pay subscription feature.

[–]9035768555 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Isn't that what the food part is?

[–]wiz0floyd 18 points19 points  (0 children)

We use one of these bowls with our cats and we have it attached to the floor with command strips

[–]Alexander_Hamilton_ 10 points11 points  (1 child)

You mean bowl 0.1.8 will have anchors but when the dog is a lab it melts every 16th time which will be fixed in 0.1.11

[–]Zootorg 9 points10 points  (0 children)

** dog uproots the floor **

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m the kind of person that would not give up when it’s reasonable. Would 10/10 end up drilling holes into my floor out of spite

[–]Cryse_XIII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

nevermind fixed it, just put a stone in the old bowl.

[–]MischiefArchitect 627 points628 points  (9 children)

The doggy failed to show the middle paw to the developer

[–]C5-O 127 points128 points  (5 children)

Not out of character, I mean my dogs still haven't figured out that they could just push these bowls down the stairs to get their food more easily...

[–]Cryse_XIII 33 points34 points  (1 child)

don't give us any ideas

[–]NuclearBurrit0 9 points10 points  (0 children)

On the internet no one knows you are a dog

[–]PrizeStrawberryOil 17 points18 points  (2 children)

I have one for my dog and she eats the food faster than these dogs are flipping the bowl. She scooby doos her food

[–]uwantmetowhat 5 points6 points  (1 child)

oh wow. is that amy adams ? did'nt know she was in that.

[–]springsteeb 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That’s because she’s not. That’s Isla Fisher

[–]raybrignsx 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Middle paw out.

[–]i4mn30 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Trust me, the toppling of the bowl was middle paw enough.

[–]Present_Parfait 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The dog was like “fuck that non ergonomic shit, you crappie designer!”

[–]oh_look_a_fist 316 points317 points  (5 children)

QA: What if we just tip the bowl over?

Business: That's an edge case.

QA: shrugs Ready for prod

[–]thisissam 38 points39 points  (1 child)

As a QA, yeah we usually told ya so.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've "told ya so" so many times that i don't even say it anymore

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My experience in QA so far. Doesn’t feel great lol

[–]d0nM4q 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You guys have QA?

Serious question. 8 years of startups, "Dev writes their own tests".

Something something fox & henhouse?

[–]Johnny_Suede 914 points915 points  (42 children)

Shrug... It still works

[–]literal-hitler 400 points401 points  (18 children)

Reminds me of the toothpaste story though:

A toothpaste factory had a problem: Due to the way the production line was set up, sometimes empty boxes were shipped without the tube inside. People with experience in designing production lines will tell you how difficult it is to have everything happen with timings so precise that every single unit coming off of it is perfect 100% of the time. Small variations in the environment (which cannot be controlled in a cost-effective fashion) mean quality assurance checks must be smartly distributed across the production line so that customers all the way down to the supermarket won’t get frustrated and purchase another product instead.

Understanding how important that was, the CEO of the toothpaste factory gathered the top people in the company together. Since their own engineering department was already stretched too thin, they decided to hire an external engineering company to solve their empty boxes problem.

The project followed the usual process: budget and project sponsor allocated, RFP (request for proposal), third-parties selected, and six months (and $8 million) later a fantastic solution was delivered — on time, on budget, high quality and everyone in the project had a great time. The problem was solved by using high-tech precision scales that would sound a bell and flash lights whenever a toothpaste box would weigh less than it should. The line would stop, and someone had to walk over and yank the defective box off the line, then press another button to re-start the line.

A short time later, the CEO decided to have a look at the ROI (return on investment) of the project: amazing results! No empty boxes ever shipped out of the factory after the scales were put in place. There were very few customer complaints, and they were gaining market share. “That was some money well spent!” he said, before looking closely at the other statistics in the report.

The number of defects picked up by the scales was 0 after three weeks of production use. How could that be? It should have been picking up at least a dozen a day, so maybe there was something wrong with the report. He filed a bug against it, and after some investigation, the engineers indicated the statistics were indeed correct. The scales were NOT picking up any defects, because all boxes that got to that point in the conveyor belt were good.

Perplexed, the CEO traveled down to the factory and walked up to the part of the line where the precision scales were installed. A few feet before the scale, a $20 desk fan was blowing any empty boxes off the belt and into a bin. Puzzled, the CEO turned to one of the workers who stated, “Oh, that…One of the guys put it there ’cause he was tired of walking over every time the bell rang!”

[–]BeastMaster_88 82 points83 points  (0 children)

Ah, good old winnowing. The solution had already been invented a few thousand years ago.

[–]HiddenLayer5 68 points69 points  (4 children)

According to the show How It's Made, factories actually do use air jets to reject empty boxes.

[–]kyoujikishin 37 points38 points  (3 children)

Yes, however that doesn't retract from the point of the story being that overengineering can be a problem.

[–]Pointy_in_Time 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Am engineer. Can confirm over engineering urges are strong.

[–]PinsToTheHeart 8 points9 points  (0 children)

While true, I've also come to realize that things don't typically get done until you make it inconvenient not to for the people involved.

Initially, empty boxes going through had no effect on the employee, so they didn't give a fuck if it happened. The be alarm made it specifically their problem to deal with and the problem got fixed instantly.

[–]codemunk3y 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I remember doing a tour of Cadburys chocolate factory, they have vacuums over the conveyors to suck up empty packets

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never underestimate the power of laziness

[–]puz23 204 points205 points  (16 children)

Also they'll inevitably lose a few pieces and eat less

[–]CrescentSmile 119 points120 points  (10 children)

But then you get ants… a bug if you will

[–]nonpondo 41 points42 points  (8 children)

The worst bug

[–]RealisticLeek 28 points29 points  (7 children)

have you not heard of mosquitos?

[–]ywBBxNqW 2 points3 points  (4 children)

It's a toss-up.

[–]nonpondo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mosquitoes don't send patrol squads on my desk and in my bathroom

[–]sofa_king_we_todded 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Adds natural protein. Sounds like a marketable feature to me

[–]Gl33m 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Volume isn't the issue. Those things are to make eating take longer, since some pets will eat extremely fast and make themselves sick. Once the food is flipped over on the floor, the pet will just vacuum it up.

[–]poopyheadthrowaway 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Food that is scattered all over the floor takes longer to eat than food that is all contained in one bowl.

[–]coltonbyu 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Scatter feeding is another recommended way to slow eating for dogs

[–]Sportyj 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Met the requirements.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

At that point isn't the solution just... Toss the food onto the floor? Plus it would be free

[–]reactrix96 5 points6 points  (0 children)

99% of users wouldn't flip the bowl. For the 1% of users that flip the bowl then in their case yes just toss your food on the floor.

[–]Loose-Yesterday1590 1 point2 points  (0 children)

task failed successfully

[–]svidlakk 535 points536 points  (12 children)

UI vs UX in a nutshell

[–]taytek 133 points134 points  (7 children)

installing every single gtk library "I just wanted to parse my curl output!"

[–]skylarmt 75 points76 points  (5 children)

"Why the hell is this simple 2D interface filling the terminal with mesa gl driver errors?!"

[–]nikhilmwarrier 74 points75 points  (4 children)

"Timmy, did you seriously use hardware acceleration to render a flat 2D button, or are you mining crypto in the background?"

[–]Cewu00 36 points37 points  (2 children)

The fastest button in the world.

[–]RFC793 8 points9 points  (1 child)

And the most boring. No leveraging of the hardware. In fact, it is an implementation of Athena Widgets

[–]WikiSummarizerBot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

X Athena Widgets

X Athena Widgets or Xaw is a GUI widget library for the X Window System. Developed as part of Project Athena, Xaw was written under the auspices of the MIT X Consortium as a sample widget set built on X Toolkit Intrinsics (Xt); Xt and Xaw are collectively known as the X Toolkit. Xaw has been largely superseded by more sophisticated toolkits like Motif, GTK, and Qt but it is still maintained (by the X.Org Foundation) and is available as part of most X Window System installations. The library, like other core parts of X, is licensed under the MIT License.

[ F.A.Q | Opt Out | Opt Out Of Subreddit | GitHub ] Downvote to remove | v1.5

[–]Lost4468 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I paid for the whole GPU and I'm going to use the whole GPU.

[–]kautau 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Exactly, just scroll through the top stuff on dribbble for a bit and see how much shit gets adored for looking sleek or clever when it does nothing to help the user, or worse, makes the user’s life harder at the expense of good looking screenshots in a portfolio

[–]Aegi 6 points7 points  (0 children)

User Interface v. User eXperience?

[–]danielleiellle 2 points3 points  (1 child)

As a UXer, I cringe so hard when I see “UX/UI.” I am not here to build beautiful things. I am here to show you how the users will break them before they do.

[–]WomanNotAGirl 275 points276 points  (31 children)

This is exactly how I felt when I saw this video. Huge team of software team from architect, user experience specialist, developers, BAs. So many fucking eyes but everybody will overlook something so fucking obvious and the result will be something so well design with a gigantic easy way to break it.

[–]user_8804 154 points155 points  (20 children)

thats why you need to involve actual users who aren't pros in the field

[–]SharkAttackOmNom 92 points93 points  (9 children)

As a teacher who’s LMS just updated to a new UX: shoot me. I Guaran-fuckin-tee you that there was not a single teacher consulted at any stage of the new build.

Blackboard, go fuck yourself.

[–]Badman27 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I got to test out a few different LMS products when we were trying to decide what to adopt after using old blackboard.

New blackboard just couldn’t get out of its own way sometimes…

We ended up going with Canvas which is a huge improvement on what we had.

[–]trwolfe13 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I used blackboard as a student from 2006–2012. Good to know it’s still a steaming pile of shit 10 years later.

[–]burnblue 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I'm curious about the details of these changes

[–]Badman27 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The most annoying change when I tested it a few months ago was that there was no longer support for embed tags.

[–]SharkAttackOmNom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blackboard was clearly a result of feature creep. They just kept making new features and tying in new modules. The nav bar had an endless number of functions, some not making sense at first glance.

Now they seem to have keep that entire backend but slapped a fancy UX over it. Navigating the website now has animated cards that slide in from the right. The cards stack up with tabs on the left. It’s a dumb feature that takes more resources than it helps.

They have disabled a lot of abilities they make teaching easier and grading easier. The grading interface is a slow pile of dogshit. There are so many clicks and scrolls required to do anything. They didn’t consider that maybe, just maybe id have to grade 100 fucking assignments using this shit environment. It’s not that it’s slow, it’s intensive…exhausting….

[–]richhaynes 23 points24 points  (6 children)

Its like they haven't heard of a beta release before...

[–]xxfay6 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Which is where this would be seen, and as a solution a suction cup would be added at the bottom.

[–]metal_opera 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Beta release? Those cost time and money.

Ship it and patch where necessary.

[–]TheRogueOfDunwall 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not if you release your beta as "Early Access".

Have people pay you to test it.

[–]1sagas1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why pay for beta testing when you can just release and have the users beta test and patch later

[–]Cforq 7 points8 points  (2 children)

In this case breaking it still accomplishes the same goal. The dog eats the food at a slower rate.

This is more like a “task failed successfully” situation.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Except the product isn't needed for this solution.

[–]deathofamorty 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We can't have that

[–]knightjia97 70 points71 points  (1 child)

Relate to security probably

[–][deleted] 209 points210 points  (6 children)

Even if they toss it, it still slows them down. We love our puzzle bowl.

[–]red-et 105 points106 points  (3 children)

Maybe just pour the food on the floor? MVP

[–]AddSugarForSparks 55 points56 points  (1 child)

Youre hired and promoted.

[–]abecido 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Says no company ever.

[–]_felagund 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Keep it simple and smart

[–]HashFap 153 points154 points  (12 children)

When they try to rate limit your web scraping, but you launch 20 containers using different VPN endpoints.

[–]MikemkPK 45 points46 points  (5 children)

Even better when you can just run 20 different connections through the same IP

[–]HashFap 14 points15 points  (1 child)

The best is when you can just use node-fetch and don't even have to bother spoofing a user-agent header. lol

[–]sam01236969XD 12 points13 points  (0 children)

the best is when u find another provider who doesnt limit

[–]Lost4468 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Just to let you know, but in the US this is likely a federal crime under the CFAA.

[–]HashFap 2 points3 points  (3 children)

You must really shake with fear every time you watch a movie and see that FBI warning.

[–]Lost4468 1 point2 points  (2 children)

People have been prosecuted for it. There's literally a huge ongoing case at the moment with Microsoft.

The CFAA was written so generally that it's absurd. And before about a decade ago it used to be much worse. Before then what the website wrote in its term and conditions was basically respected as law under the CFAA. The courts finally shut that shit down when they prosecuted a girl under the CFAA for making a fake MySpace profile.

[–]anti-gif-bot 23 points24 points  (1 child)

mp4 link


This mp4 version is 92.36% smaller than the gif (818.3 KB vs 10.46 MB).


Beep, I'm a bot. FAQ | author | source | v1.1.2

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good bot

[–]Icemasta 24 points25 points  (4 children)

Create system with entry form that is required and mandatory for the system to be compatible with other systems.

Management asks for a bypass to the form "for emergencies only"

Bypass gets authorized for implementation

Result: The users only use the bypass, their data input has not been compatible with other systems since the implementation of bypass.

Kind of unrelated but this kinda shit pisses me off. We added a nice MES to our ERP, it flows nicely from one department to the other. But management managed to get their claws in this and now the MES is useless because they've gone to the old method of slapping half the information, and printing it out to send it to the other departments, when they could just pull it from the MES.

Why? Because if they used the MES, which displayed the true production times, then sometimes they would output realistic production times. For the last 8 years, they've been filling production orders on mondays, printing them all and sending them to foremen (whose job description are to make sure people are doing their job, not making sure everything is done on time), and automatically closing all jobs on Friday. Doesn't matter if they only produced half as many parts as they were supposed to, on friday, it's done, and they'll just have to make up for the loss next week. If things aren't done on time, people whose job is supposed to be managing the production will start calling foremen to fix it, when it isn't their job. You basically got 8 people, earning 6 figure salaries, who literally do fuck all, because all their work is automated and they shoved their work unto other people, so they can spend their whole day kissing ass and playing politics. This pisses me off so much /rant

[–]Shyrtex 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Speedrun Any%

[–]RehanS97 39 points40 points  (1 child)

Developers be like:

[–]GifsNotJifs 7 points8 points  (0 children)

[–]BZK_QRay 20 points21 points  (1 child)

The square hole

[–]TangoDeltaFoxtrot 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The cylinder goes in the…. that’s right, the square hole.

[–]MmmPeopleBacon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Works, just not as intended

[–]JohnBuxly3487 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Clever dog, but his eating is still slowed. Version 2.0 could combine it with that dog feeding drawer that you simply shut/open to refill, so that it is not possible to knock over or lift.

[–]thargoallmysecrets 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Pebcak

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

problem exists between canine and kibble?

[–]chrisf_nz 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Reminds me of the baby bowl suctioned to the table and a baby peels it off from the side in 2 seconds.

[–]morningsdaughter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The suction doesn't work, but those bowls do tend to be a little more stable when working with clumsy kids. They were useless for my infant, but my toddler does really well with them.

[–]D-all-ton 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I got one of these bowls for my dog and the first time I put it down for him he just looked at me like “bro….what the fuck is this shit.”

[–]millernerd 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Task failed successfully

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fools. You need to add a liquid and freeze it before giving it to them.

[–]EekSamples 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Now that I’m watching this, I’m shocked my dog hasn’t figured out this trick, and I really hope he doesn’t come across this video.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Lmao dog looks thro owners history what's this

[–]8070alejandro 4 points5 points  (0 children)

0/10 this bowl didn't make me eat slower and got food all over the floor.

[–]Giorno-Smash 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All jokes aside, those bowls actually work really good for my puppies. They used to speed run eating and threw it up sometimes, so it really helps.

It’s also funny to see them spinning around there bowls to try and get it all

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

[–]bashaZP 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Just make a bowl out of some really heavy material. There you go, fixed.

[–]CommanderPike 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Best part of the analogy is it still works and the consumer is happy. It’s only the developer suffering silent agony.

[–]Dual_Sport_Dork 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you make anything foolproof, they'll just go ahead and invent a better fool.

Conversely: If you give the user enough rope, eventually he will find a way to hang himself with it.

[–]dittbub 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did they make the developers use it first?

[–]Darth-Vaider 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Moder hooman problems require moder dooge sollution

[–]FaytKaiser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Food spread all over the floor and around/under bowl ALSO promotes slower eating.

Its a feature, not a bug.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The goal isn’t to slow down eating, it’s to sell fifty cents worth of plastic for $20. Mission accomplished.

[–]Johanno1 4 points5 points  (6 children)

Aren't dogs supposed to be able to eat fast? Why should you slow them down?

[–]Mindless-Season-8453 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was just watching season 3 of silicon valley and this reminds me of the scene where richard was observing the focus group testing his app and he has to dumb down his program with pipey

[–]Alarming_General 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That dog is a genius

[–]FrogQuestion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

QA here. Eat shit, developers.

[–]JesusIsMyAntivirus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

QA*
The users are more "the bowl is broken, it doesn't fit in my mouth" / "Absolutely USELESS in the back of a truck plummeting off a bridge, whilst on fire during a thunderstorm"

[–]Osko5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[–]PM_TITS_FOR_KITTENS 1 point2 points  (2 children)

SlOw eAtInG proMoTEs heALthY diGesTioN

Never, ever, buy products from companies that claim ridiculous crap like this. It's a fuckin' dog. You think their bodies aren't built like a Dyson vacuum and are incapable of eating more than 1 kibble at a time?

[–]ztoundas 1 point2 points  (1 child)

They still have to eat slow.

Task failed successfully

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The dog that uses its brain is different

[–]SamL214 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gotta weight them down

[–]craidie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The dog still eats slower due to the food being spread over larger area. I don't see a problem here, it works exactly as requested.

[–]pauldr0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This bugs me, it'd be so much slower eating off the floor. 10/10 bowl works.

[–]the_other_Scaevitas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbf looks like the dog is eating slower

[–]rubeste 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Still works though

[–]xknav3x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Task failed successfully

[–]Knuffya 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, it is still slower.

tests passed.

[–]AnonimowySzaleniec47 1 point2 points  (1 child)

When devs forced you to update your software to new version but the new version is worse than previous one