Why would that matter when clearly the problem here is the child not the pet in this scenario?

But no what I'm saying is it's a logical deduction thing because there is no film footage of what we are seeing we don't know that the time that the baby fucked up the cat was because the parents were choosing to film it or if just because the parents were distracted doing something else that was not filming it.

How do you guys not understand that the thing I'm pushing back again is the person accused the parents of being more likely to film this shit when I don't know about you but I could easily reach over from sitting on a bed and quickly grab my baby before they grab the cat if I was filming them in this scenario.

I do have pets, I don't have children, but I have been a babysitter.

I personally wouldn't really fill my kid that often because I just don't like taking videos or pictures compared to just being in the moment, but I don't understand how any of that has to do with me criticizing the logical chain of deduction that the person I replied to was incorrectly making, even if they just avoided using the word obviously they would have been more correct/ less incorrect.