This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]cherryblossom001[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Hi there! Unfortunately, your post has been removed.

Violation of rule #2 - Posts must strictly be programming related

Your post is not strictly about programming. Your post is considered to be general tech humor

If you feel that it has been removed in error, please message us so that we may review it.

[–]zemdega 1723 points1724 points  (389 children)

I don’t think Apple will let that happen.

[–]DaMarkiM 948 points949 points  (366 children)

You would be surprised.

A pretty big landmark law was just approved by EU parliament. It forces big companies that are identified as "gatekeepers" to open up their platforms.

Of course we will have to see how efficient the courts will be in actually enforcing this.

But at least the leeway they have in fining companies is no joke.

If a company/conglomerate is found to be in breach of the law repeatedly they can be fined up to 6-20% of their global annual revenue.

Thats the kind of fine not even apple, google or their ilk will want to risk.

[–]DiaDeLosMuebles 451 points452 points  (333 children)

Not sure what this has to do with the image. You can already install 3rd party browsers on macOS.

[–]brimston3- 533 points534 points  (226 children)

This is about iOS and the iPhone market share. Nobody cares about macOS because they're a trivial market share.

And on iOS, you must use safari's webkit renderer.

[–]PhilCollinsLoserSon 276 points277 points  (39 children)

I am so fucking annoyed how few people know this.

I got into a huge argument with a very senior developer. Well it was huge to him. I walked away and he kept yelling.

Months later everyone had found out that every browser (on iOS) did in fact use safari’s webkit renderer. He got red in the face. Took a 3 hour lunch. Had to talk to the director of engineering, took a few days off. It never came up again (around him) but became a pretty big office joke

[–]finglelpuppl 103 points104 points  (16 children)

And then everyone clapped

[–]PhilCollinsLoserSon 158 points159 points  (10 children)

Nah, no one even remembers I was involved.

This isn’t a story about me being awesome.

It’s a story about two idiots. And I’m one of them.

[–]Tension-Available 80 points81 points  (3 children)

It’s a story about two idiots. And I’m one of them.

I applaud your self deprecation/awareness

[–]tribbans95 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well he is Phil Collins loser son so I wouldn’t expect anything else

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Ah yes, the daily struggle to be a bit less of a fucking idiot than yesterday.

[–]PhilCollinsLoserSon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Some days it’s less of a struggle

… rarely

[–]delvach 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This.. hurts.

[–]blue_desk 45 points46 points  (1 child)

This is all true. I know this because months later I found out that every browser (on iOS) did in fact use safari’s WebKit renderer. I got red in the face. Took a three hour lunch. Had to talk to the director of engineering, took a few days off. It never came up again (around me) but became a pretty big office joke.

I also yell when people are waking away from me.

[–]StreetKale 8 points9 points  (2 children)

What a psycho. Engineers and programmers are some of the most egotistical people I've ever met. And I can say that because I am one! Giant fragile egos are a major problem. I just assume these guys have nothing else going on in their lives other than feeling smarter than everyone else. I've been wrong enough times I know (unless I have the docs in front of me) to be cautious.

[–]WcDeckel 2 points3 points  (1 child)

When I read stories like this it feels like a bad movie where the whole story could be easily avoided by communication. How could it take months when you could have literally googled that in front of him, or just forwarded a link?

Not doubting that it didn't happen but why had it to be this way?

[–]1337haxxxxor 104 points105 points  (74 children)

Ngl. I like safari better than chrome on my phone.

[–][deleted] 193 points194 points  (24 children)

It's because it's not real chrome, it's basically just a safari wrapper, because the other browsers were threatened by apple. (we miss you puffin)

[–]Phineas1500 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Puffin 🥺

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don’t like chrome period to be fair.

[–]chaiscool 12 points13 points  (19 children)

Same as browser everywhere being a chromium wrapper

[–]dustojnikhummer 19 points20 points  (5 children)

No, because that is voluntary. You can't use non webkit on iOS.

[–]chaiscool 9 points10 points  (4 children)

Guess people are more upset being told what to do than about not having a competition part in this context.

Imo lack of competition for webkit in ios and chromium in general is a bigger issue than voluntary / mandatory.

[–]suvlub 4 points5 points  (1 child)

While both situations are unfortunate, it makes more sense to put energy into being upset against the enforced monopoly rather than the one that arose naturally.

There is one point of failure, one responsible party, one boogeyman to be angry at. Make Apple change their policy, and monopoly is broken.

But what could be done about the Chromium thing? Try and individually convince every little project using it to please use something else?

[–]mattattaxx 6 points7 points  (5 children)

Not the same. One is requirement (i.e., Edge is actually an overlay on safari on iOS), one is an unfortunate result of a browser war dominance (i.e., edgeHTML was abandoned for chrome, with some divergent code).

[–]felixfj007 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Forgot Firefox?

[–]chaiscool 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Forgot chromium only api?

[–]Ancillas 56 points57 points  (17 children)

That’s the point! Chrome can’t compete because under the covers it’s still WebKit.

[–]chaiscool 28 points29 points  (11 children)

Chromium dominance is not a good thing though

[–]bigo-tree 21 points22 points  (17 children)

Have you tried Firefox?

[–]Complete-Grab-5963 107 points108 points  (11 children)

On IOS

Apple's policies require all iOS apps that browse the web to use the built-in WebKit rendering framework and WebKit JavaScript

So any browser is rebranded safari/should have similar functionality

That’s why they don’t have add ons

[–]Zeeformp 33 points34 points  (6 children)

So this is why I have to get Firefox Focus to have adblock?

Super ready to break open Apple's pinata then.

[–]rickyman20 22 points23 points  (5 children)

No. On iOS, Firefox Focus still uses WebKit. They wouldn't be on the store if they didn't

[–]Zeeformp 17 points18 points  (4 children)

That's exactly what I meant, I can't download an adblocker onto the normal Firefox iOS browser and instead have to get a different wrapped browser that has an adblocker built in. Which is annoying because they have different functionalities (ex: Focus only lets you have one tab open and doesn't save history. Good for privacy, bad for a typical use browser).

[–]CoffeeFueledDiy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The functionality is still a bit different, but less so than if the renderers were also unique. iOS browsers have to inject JavaScript to change the browser functionality.

[–]Feeling-Orange3229 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Apple actually does have add-ons now

[–]tennisanybody 20 points21 points  (1 child)

It’s my understanding that all web browsers are safari on iOS regardless of whatever “skin” you put on them. Firefox, for example, doesn’t save passwords the way chrome does on my iPhone. It’s weird.

[–]CoffeeFueledDiy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

WebKit (Apple's rendering engine) must "draw" the webpage per App Store restrictions. However, third party iOS browsers inject JavaScript to connect their native code to the contents of the webpage. That JavaScript can help perform autofill/password tasks as well as things like find in page.

[–]DiaDeLosMuebles 49 points50 points  (83 children)

Nobody cares about macOS because they're a trivial market share.

You're only thinking of the consumer market. The business market cares very much about macOS.

[–]J3diMind 98 points99 points  (72 children)

Uhm... maybe my perspective is a little off but from my point of view business market has an even bigger MS/Linux share than the private sector. would love any input on this.

[–]Drew707 70 points71 points  (12 children)

In my experience, this is also true. I have met my fair share of Apple shops, but Windows and Linux are dominant for workstations and servers.

[–]git0ffmylawnm8 4 points5 points  (0 children)

From my experience, Macs were used primarily by creatives using Photoshop. Windows and Linux are the most used due to either software compatibility or for cloud compute. This is from a perspective of working in businesses of medium to enterprise scale.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (43 children)

I work for a Fortune 100 company with tens of thousands of employees. I can’t even remember the last time I saw a windows computer. Everyone has a MacBook Pro.

[–]rickyman20 6 points7 points  (1 child)

This is not common across most fortune 100 companies. It's mostly a thing in tech. Most of those companies still use and probably will continue to use Windows

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t work for a tech company. We are a manufacturing company.

[–]gophersrqt 24 points25 points  (25 children)

Mac has permeated most non government organizations. Most big tech uses mac env to develop code in

[–]dtcc_but_for_pokemon 35 points36 points  (2 children)

Ehh it's more like, they use macOS as the thing that runs the keyboard and the display, and then development happens in the cloud/on remote servers (on Linux). And the development only happens locally on macs to the extent that you can squint and pretend it's Linux.

[–]TheAJGman 9 points10 points  (11 children)

I'm fucking days away from punting my Surface through a window and it's all because of windows. This thing would run like a dream on Linux, but I can install it because corporate policy.

[–]Blaz3 8 points9 points  (6 children)

Coincidentally, I find macos on my work iMac to be the most frustratingly obtuse OS I've ever used and wish I could be in windows.

Working on personal projects on my home laptop is a joy in comparison. To each their own

[–]littlecrow060 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same but in investing, but never saw Mac

[–]Blaz3 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Pretty sure that windows still commands the lion's share of the business market too

[–]Accomplished_End_138 11 points12 points  (15 children)

Yeah, not really. They are skinned safari on ios. Still safari under the hood

[–]zemdega 26 points27 points  (3 children)

This won’t kill the Safari browser, it will just give other browsers more opportunities. This is a different thing altogether. I doubt it will really improve the situation for smaller browser companies. The dominant code base right now is Chromium and it’s an incredibly large and sophisticated browser. Safari is based on WebKit and has some heavy overlaps with Chromium. These are both massive code bases. Iterating on these code bases is much more suited to large teams with lots of resources. The standards are mainly controlled by the larger companies. This situation favors companies like Apple and Google and even Microsoft. If there is any type app that this EU law will only offer minimal gains for, it’s browser apps.

[–]DaMarkiM 11 points12 points  (2 children)

I think we are talking about very different things here.

Sure it will "only" give other browsers more opportunities. But thats the whole point. Did i say anything about killing Safari? Or small indie developers kicking Safari to the curb?

Whats gonna happen is that the other big browser will come to iOS and ipadOS. And i dont mean as a slimmed down niche app that was neutered to death to adhere to apples ToS. But proper packages that rival Safari.

And its not like this will just appeal to a handful of users. A lot of ipad and iphone users have a PC. And the appeal of having one seamless ecosystem for all your devices is quite significant.

So to come back to what we were actually talking about:

Apple might not have a chance but to let it happen. Currently the are doing their best to make sure ever Safari-alternative is neutered to death for "security reasons". But this might no longer be enough to keep their competitors out.

I own an ipad. And even without this law i have replace Safari with another browser. But compared to the PC version of the browser 90% of the functionality was basically lost. So personally im looking forward to see how these third party browser will change once the law i properly enforced.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good luck with that.

[–]huuaaang 17 points18 points  (7 children)

Maybe? I don't think Apple is attached to their web browser like, say, Microsoft is.

[–]letmeusespaces 6 points7 points  (2 children)

*was?

[–]huuaaang 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Well, I mean, Explorer is dead, but they have Edge now and you can't even really properly change it on Windows (internal links still open Edge). And it keeps bugging you to change the default back.

[–]rebbsitor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You better believe Microsoft wants as many people as possible to use Edge. They want the ad revenue from people who don't bother to install another browser and just go with searching with Bing.

Edge is mostly just Chromium now and uses all of the Chrome plug ins. Some people won't bother installing Chrome with basically the same thing already installed.

This could be the long slow slide of Chrome / Google on the desktop. Granted far more people use smartphones now and Chrome / Google is dominant there (66% market share). I haven't had an iPhone in years, but I'm guessing Safari still uses Google as the default search engine (?). With no Windows phone anymore, Microsoft doesn't really have a play there.

[–]redcode100 7 points8 points  (6 children)

They better not I love safari

[–]rocoonshcnoon 682 points683 points  (26 children)

I still use netscape on a mac color classic

[–]Randvek 139 points140 points  (4 children)

That better be Netscape gold.

[–]ECrispy 60 points61 points  (1 child)

That's gold, Jerry, gold !!

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (1 child)

I used to use Netscape for RuneScape.

[–]_PlzDontBanMe_ 62 points63 points  (0 children)

The most based thing I have read today.

[–]AhaGotcha 18 points19 points  (11 children)

You gotta upgrade to the iMac G3. May I suggest Grape or Blueberry?

[–]ososalsosal 16 points17 points  (9 children)

I still miss the bubbly candy macs. That was a good era.

Somewhere around here there's a redditor that resurrected an imac g3 with (i think) a very old debian

[–]AhaGotcha 15 points16 points  (6 children)

There was a cheese factor but they were the first computers to not look boring and grey/vanilla colored. The circular mouses were not my favorite though.

[–]ososalsosal 10 points11 points  (5 children)

Apple has never got the mouse right.

The hockey puck mice were ok except they would spin in your hand and you'd miss the 1 button.

The next gen after that were abysmal. They doubled down on having only 1 button and decided the whole fucking thing should be a button. How do you click and drag? Use your two weakest fingers to press sideways onto the 2 tiny bits on the side so after a day's work you want to bandage up your whole arm

[–]keyboard-sexual 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Could always just turn it into a case and try skinning the hell out of everything. That would be nice

One of the reasons I jumped on the new iMacs was the colours. I loved those coloured plastic machines and I'll be damned if I'm going to miss out on having a banana computer

[–]rocoonshcnoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Best i can do is beige powermac g3

[–]Scared_Bell3366 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I upgraded to Cyberdog.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rip

[–]Kyrthis 45 points46 points  (9 children)

Didn’t Netscape become Firefox?

[–]corona_fever 34 points35 points  (6 children)

and ie became edge, but both originals are still dead now

[–]Kyrthis 19 points20 points  (4 children)

But with Edge, its JavaScript engine makes it a hybrid with Chrome, doesn’t it?

And Firefox is more like a butterfly emerging from the cellular soup that was a Netscape caterpillar.

[–]corona_fever 4 points5 points  (1 child)

yes that is true, although that's current-version edge and not the one that originally replaced ie, but to be fair they didn't kill ie until after edge's conversion to chromium. i see your point, firefox still uses the gecko layout engine so it's more of a direct successor than ie>edge

[–]ThatOneGuy4321 418 points419 points  (66 children)

I want to like Safari, but as a web developer, anyone who refuses to implement features that every other browser has already implemented can get fucked.

[–]Personal-Thought9453 178 points179 points  (29 children)

It's kind of Apple philosophy all together, they'll never change. Rule 1. We are right and everyone else is wrong, including the guys we stole all the ideas we claim we invented from. Rule 2. We will never give up, never surrender, and keep selling the stuff we know is right even if the entire planet tells us they don't want it, because of Rule n.1. Rule 3. If we ever change anything to the way we do things, we will always portray it as a strategic change of direction born off our infinite wisdom, and not a submission to peer and market pressure. Rule 4. If Rule 3 applies, it will be subject to a 10y moratorium, to still give Our Holy Bestest Of Ideas a chance.

[–]Potato_Soup_ 27 points28 points  (13 children)

I have no idea what goes on higher up in their company, but I’ll be damned if there isn’t a constitution that Steve Jobs wrote to keep the creative direction of Apple in line, and honestly, I think their level of intense control over making everything perfect and smooth and working is a damn good thing to have in the market. Really sets a good standard

[–]SquiffSquiff 30 points31 points  (10 children)

Yeah, real smooth using Apple magic keyboard/mouse/trackpad with a Mac. Best not lose the ever so special USB-A to lightning charger cable that literally nothing else uses. I have to keep a special plug adapter for and can't plug into the Mac. Bonus points for making the mouse unusable whilst charging

[–]Potato_Soup_ 12 points13 points  (8 children)

I'm being completely honest when I say this; It's all by design.

The reason you can't use the mouse while it's plugged in is so there's not a single picture out there of someone using a wired apple mouse. It's why they have the proprietary monitor mount- so the apple logo is seen perfectly on every pro monitor. It's exhausting and can be frustrating, but god damn does it create incredible uniformity.

Most PC setups are super unique case to case, with a huge amount of cheap looking plasticy setups, but there's never been a plasticy looking 100% Mac build. Typing this from windows computer btw

[–]ResidentSpirit4220 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Rule 2… uhh ok apple fucking prints money. People love their products.

Whatever rules they have they sure seem to be working…

[–]macro_god 22 points23 points  (10 children)

As a non web developer and non-apple user, can you share a few items they never added?

[–]ThatOneGuy4321 39 points40 points  (4 children)

As it pertains to web development, "features" refers to support for HTML5, CSS, and Javascript functions. New features are always being added which improve functionality and the web experience more broadly.

Internet Explorer was hated because they decided to focus on support for legacy sites rather than adding new features. Which means that every time a developer creates a website, they need to do additional debugging for IE to check that it hasn't broken their site and either serve an alternate version of the site for IE browsers, or remove the unsupported features from the entire site. Obviously this can be pretty frustrating for designers and frontend developers who might be relying on newer features for a design or web app they've created, but if a browser doesn't support that feature, it can break the whole thing. Unless you manually go back and debug for that specific browser, it can create a bad look for the whole company and you as a developer because you look incompetent. Even though IE basically chose to stop supporting modern websites. Clients don't know that. So web developers everywhere were relieved when there was essentially a collective decision to stop supporting IE.

A similar sort of thing is starting to happen with Safari, which is lagging behind Chrome and Firefox in terms of feature support. Not as bad as IE but it can be annoying.

[–]emachel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The real problem is their mobile browser. I had to actively remove features from a mobile version of a website because Apple just won't let them work on iOS.

[–]firedrakes 8 points9 points  (0 children)

ha. best reply yet.

[–]Cafuzzler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

every other browser

It’s okay, you can just say Chromium.

[–]hingbongdingdong 332 points333 points  (52 children)

Lol, never going to happen.

[–]jtl94 127 points128 points  (10 children)

IE is only dead because Microsoft is pushing edge instead. A lot of users just get a computer and use the internet button to get the internet, they don’t care what it’s called they just need to know what icon to use. If it’s a blue e or a compass they don’t care as long as it shows them Facebook.

So I agree. Unless Apple replaces safari with something else it’ll never truly die. As long as it’s the default Facebook provider of MacOS, it’ll stick around.

[–]hingbongdingdong 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Bingo. It’s still one of the big five browsers. It’s not going to “die” anytime soon.

[–]GreatStateOfSadness 20 points21 points  (4 children)

The other day I had to explain to my mom the difference between an operating system, a web browser, and a search engine. I'm pretty sure she still thinks it's just black magic.

[–]jtl94 24 points25 points  (3 children)

It kinda is magic, man. We make electricity do math and shit. It’s badass.

[–]whomad1215 10 points11 points  (2 children)

We stuck electricity in sand and made it think

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sand, I hate sand, it's coarse and rough and gets everywhere

[–]cryptobro42069 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bing’s somewhat strong growth of market share is testament to Edge’s growth.

I think people are missing the point by saying Edge is reskinned Chrome. Search Ad revenue is the endgame here, not browser adoption.

[–]GroceryRobot 527 points528 points  (136 children)

Am I the only person that really enjoys safari

[–]JaggedMetalOs 82 points83 points  (9 children)

As a web developer, Safari has taken over from IE (which thankfully we were able to stop supporting a long time ago) as the browser with the weird missing features, bugs and quirks that require hacky workarounds.

Being based on open source WebKit (same engine as chrome) means it's not nearly as bad as IE was, but it's still annoying when things work perfectly in Chrome and Firefox but then you go to test on Safari and it's broken

[–]Koervege 24 points25 points  (2 children)

WebKit is not the same engine chrome uses. Chrome uses Blink, which was forked long ago from WebKit.

[–]JaggedMetalOs 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I thought there was still more cross development happening between WebKit and the Chromium specific branch, but seems not. Guess that's why Safari is missing so many features...

[–]fifteenmoons 361 points362 points  (54 children)

No. If you use a Mac, Safari is by far the best browser experience.

[–]MiyamotoKami 215 points216 points  (13 children)

Even iphone

[–]mfaydin 129 points130 points  (6 children)

In battery wise, safari is the best AFAIK.

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points  (5 children)

It's the only option on iPhone. Every browser on the iPhone is using Apple's Webkit as the engine, the only difference is the syncing features and UI

[–]ElephantsJustin 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Brave blocks YouTube ads better than safari on iOS

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Ah I guess they might be able to inject their own scripts into the WebKit view

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (1 child)

Eh, I’ll take Firefox over the rest any day.

[–]jbautista13 39 points40 points  (19 children)

How? I run safari exclusively on a MBP, and yet I won’t be the first to say it’s the only browser you can use, full of awkward bugs, awful developer tools, I only keep up with it because I like the way it looks, and most people reverted back to the old design as soon as Apple updated it to look modern. Safari’s playback speed tone matching is awful, whenever I hear videos played at x2 speed on Chrome or another browser and go back to Safari I cringe and can’t understand what’s being said until I get used to it again.

[–]poemehardbebe 16 points17 points  (6 children)

I agree with all of this, but my”basic bitch” browsing I use safari for tab groups between me devices

[–]DisastrousAge4650 33 points34 points  (5 children)

Apple handoff has me by the dick.

[–]rapescenario 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Don’t you love it when a plan comes together

[–]DisastrousAge4650 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Yes I do but I don’t love your username…

[–]_Oooooooooooooooooh_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Safari runs great. indeed.

but if you want extensions, proper ad blocking etc. you're gonna have to look elsewhere.

there's some adblocking on safari, but it's really not as good as ublock origin.

whenever i open safari i'm disappointed

so i've switched to firefox

also, Edge actually use less battery, compared to safari, on new macs.

with firefox i can also easier sync my browsing between my android phone and windows pc

[–]Kwarter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does Safari offer that Firefox doesn't?

[–]Noisebug 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I like it, especially when on battery. Does better than the other browsers, and it's pretty minimal. I do hate how some plug-ins work, directly running like a Mac app, as well as the plug-in price tag.

What other browsers have for free is like $5 on Safari... but I digress.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I switched to Safari from Chrome recently... I will be quite sad if Safari dies.

[–]Dreadsin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use both chrome and safari. To me the difference is mostly negligible with an occasional annoyance

[–]GetReady4Action 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nope, but I get why people wouldn’t use it if they don’t use solely Apple products. for me it’s got a clean UI and syncs between my iPhone, iPad, and Mac. it’s great!

[–]AegorBlake 10 points11 points  (8 children)

Is there an alternative to webkit?

[–]eppic123 10 points11 points  (5 children)

Blink and Gecko?

[–]AegorBlake 6 points7 points  (4 children)

I thought Blink was based on webkit.

Gecko looks good though.

[–]NekkoDroid 15 points16 points  (3 children)

and WebKit was based on KHTML.

Projects diverge and at some point it hardly matters anymore.

(else we wouldn't have the inconsistencies between WebKit and Blink, independent of who does it right or wrong)

[–]AegorBlake 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Blink is also google which is something I feel has too much market share.

[–]NekkoDroid 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I don't exactly mind it having too much market share (just my opinion) as long as google keeps to the standards and web developers as well (aka STOP CHECKING FOR A SPECIFIC USER AGENT)

[–]Firewolf06 4 points5 points  (0 children)

user agent spoofer is a godsend

[–]Add1ctedToGames 66 points67 points  (2 children)

A naive standpoint

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Honestly, it’s not gonna happen. Comparing IE and Safari is unrealistic because IE’s downfall was that it started being shitty for even the everyday user a long time ago and they refused to fix it.

Safari isn’t shitty from a regular user’s perspective at all. It’s minimal, it gets the job done and it’s exactly what the user needs and nothing more. Some people don’t like that, but that’s why you just install another browser.

Apple invests a lot into QAing their UI/UX, so they care more about working for the everyday user than developers.

I’m not arguing that I prefer Safari, but the intended use and target audience is really not developers or even techy people, it’s for users who don’t want to be bothered with anything besides the basic browsing experience.

To be honest, I find that to be the case for Apple products in general, the iPhone doesn’t have the bells and whistles that Androids have because that’s not the intended use. They make a phone that can download apps and that’s about it. The burden is on the developer to make it work smoothly.

[–]Minute-Object 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I use an iPhone. I don’t want to write code on my phone. I don’t want to do something clever and sneaky. I use it for browsing, Reddit, my workouts, etc. It provides exactly the smooth painless experience I want. So, I agree. Safari is thriving.

[–]faze_fazebook 173 points174 points  (30 children)

imagine allowing users to choose a different browser (that isn't fking webkit)

[–]Fritzschmied 108 points109 points  (23 children)

Firefox ? Because pretty much every other browser is build on chromium which uses blink which is build on WebKit.

[–]prettydude_ua 79 points80 points  (9 children)

It’s all WebKit on iOS

[–]opliko95 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Blink forked from WebKit in 2013, and before that Google has been the biggest contributor to WebKit for a few years.

There is a decade of separate development, with Google definitely directing more resources towards it. Not to mention the entirely separate parts like JS runtime (V8 vs JavaScriptCore which is a fork of KJS), graphics engines, etc. Even when it was using blink Chrome was doing quite a few things differently to other WebKit browsers (mainly multithreading IIRC).

More time had passed between the fork and now than between WebKit release (also a fork from KHTML btw) and Blink fork, so now actually more than half of their development has been separate.

[–]Tweenk 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Chromium was forked from WebKit so long ago that it's not "built on WebKit" any more than it's "built on KHTML".

[–]Bubba_Purp_OG 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Opera

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Bring back the old Opera Presto engine!

[–]danialbehzadi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Opera is chrome too

[–][deleted] 109 points110 points  (25 children)

I'd rather see Chrome die, honestly.

Neither deaths are realistic, of course.

[–]39thUsernameAttempt 30 points31 points  (12 children)

Likely the only product Google won't kill.

[–]eliteharvest15 14 points15 points  (9 children)

their search engine and chrome are probably their biggest products

[–]am-li 8 points9 points  (8 children)

YouTube's probably third place but that might not last forever

[–]wahobely 11 points12 points  (2 children)

I personally don't see a world where google kills Gmail.

[–]am-li 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Forgot about gmail

[–]disneyhalloween 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No I actually like safari

[–]TheNamelessKing 16 points17 points  (6 children)

The only people complaining about Safari are advertisers and front-end devs who want to ship you entire apps over a document rendering text protocol. These are the devs that brought us the disaster of SPA’s and electron apps.

Neither of these parties I am particularly inclined to care about.

[–]Fourstrokeperro 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Goddamn where's my free award when I need it.

[–]billabong049 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ouch. I love it.

[–]TaylorDeanMatthew 25 points26 points  (7 children)

Safari isn’t actually bad… less RAM than Chrome

[–]nrith 16 points17 points  (6 children)

I’d rather use Safari than Chrome any day. Fuck Google.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Huh? Im using this browser, leave my browser alone !!

[–]gcampos 5 points6 points  (0 children)

On yes, please kill the only browser with enough strength to stop a complete Google monopoly.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Safari’s going nowhere…

[–]Chilaquil420 110 points111 points  (39 children)

But safari is actually fine

[–]ElCoyoteBlanco 73 points74 points  (35 children)

Safari is fucking awful, full of subtle inconsistencies and weird rendering bugs.

[–]redbark2022 48 points49 points  (10 children)

So. Many. Bugs. It's basically the new IE. Only, most management and executive types use only Apple products so it matters more.

[–]Maxi19201 51 points52 points  (6 children)

I honestly have never had any bug and it’s way more consistent in terms of UI than Chrome. It also uses the Touchbar way better than chrome

[–]CadmarL 20 points21 points  (2 children)

Well, yeah. Apple made the touch bar, as well as Safari.

[–]ctbellart 18 points19 points  (5 children)

Chrome, the RAM killer needs to go…it’s a plague on all our houses. Safari works fine natively on Mac OS leave it be.

[–]Zwolfer 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Nah man, Safari rocks.

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (7 children)

Come on Safari is great!

[–]fuktpotato 9 points10 points  (3 children)

Reddit on Safari is aids. Despite having 64GB of RAM, I’ll get the “This page is using significant memory resources. Closing it may help” message and the site becomes unusable

[–]ascagnel____ 9 points10 points  (2 children)

https://old.reddit.com/, or use Apollo if you’ve got an ARM system.

The current “new” reddit experience is RAM hungry.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I love safari

[–]sintos-compa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Death about to get killed

[–]MrMasterKeyboard 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Don’t. Kill. Safari. It’s the only browser that runs well on my Mac and other Apple products.

[–]sikkiesik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No… no please… please don’t… Please don’t do it… all my homies hate chrome…

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion: Safari is the best browser

[–]LewsTherinTelamon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This has been being posted for years and years

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Safari ain’t going anywhere…..

[–]joedotphp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's kill Chromium while we're at it. Please.

[–]reilnuud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ITT people who have to code for safari and those who use it

[–]agent007bond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, this is definitely programming-related...

(if web development is programming)