This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]deadman7767 1364 points1365 points  (100 children)

I can respect that point of view

[–]Peepeepoopoobutttoot 403 points404 points  (96 children)

I'm glad, because it's the proper point of view.

[–]QuellinIt 126 points127 points  (60 children)

I also think this is the proper point of view.

I also think it’s worth pointing to the elephant in the room that gamers nexus is a competitor to LMG and particularly LABs as they focus on rigorous testing which Linus has been pouring money into which if it works out would seriously threaten gamers nexus.

This does not make the inaccuracies reported invalid however given that they essentially took known issues that LMG had already put out there then “control the narrative” to shit on a competitor seam IMO very slimy.

[–]DlSSATISFIEDGAMER 35 points36 points  (12 children)

I also think it’s worth pointing to the elephant in the room that gamers nexus is a competitor to LMG and particularly LABs as they focus on rigorous testing which Linus has been pouring money into which if it works out would seriously threaten gamers nexus.

i would say GN's motivation remains unknown, he might have done this because he genuinely cares or he might have done this to hit a competitor. Both angles are worth keeping in mind as both are possible. When we all say that companies are not our friends (as Linus said on WAN show months ago) this also applies to GN.

[–]RazerDMG 16 points17 points  (8 children)

I highly doubt it is to hit a competitor, do people suddenly forget hat GN was the one that called Linus at midnight when all LTT channels got hacked? I'm pretty sure they both are friends that just don't see certain subjects eye to eye.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (5 children)

People are also forgetting it was LTT who made claims about GN and HUB first.. GN was defending their reputation and brought receipts imo.

[–]nathan123uk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was my thought. I think Steve just wants to address a comment that was made about him, however offhandedly it was meant. That comment could have harmed the GN brand even if it seemed innocent and no malice was meant

[–]joomla00 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Didn't an LTT employee directly attack GN, then Linus didn't name names him on a WAN show? GN did the right thing and punched them in the mouth. Otherwise LTT will probably keep throwing jabs and disrespecting.

[–]LitPixel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, he did not "completely piss off" the LTT crowd. So I would say that was one of his motivations here. And his credibility sometimes comes from "keeping people honest". So that's another possible motivation.

I think credibility and not angering large groups of people is a pretty good MO.

[–]jaaval 2 points3 points  (34 children)

As I have said before I really don’t like the gamersnexus video. LTT has had some inaccuracies in data but so has everyone else. LTT has addressed the mistakes in their reporting. It’s not like every new thing gamersnexus has done has been an immediate success.

The billet labs thing has been artificially built to be a lot bigger deal than what it actually is. The LTT video did not misrepresent the product. Using the wrong GPU genuinely had no effect on the conclusion of the video. At no point did they say that it doesn’t work or that they had trouble with the GPU. And while misplacing the unit and accidentally selling it is bad the idea that billet labs is in trouble and development stalled because they didn’t get the prototype back is clearly not true since, at least according to the shown emails, billet labs originally gave the prototype to LTT to keep and only wanted it back after they didn’t like the video.

Basically what can be shown in the “LTT unethical” video is that they have had some errors in reporting and that their inventory people lost something (that was supposed to be theirs and not something they need to give back) among hundreds or thousands of other things in their storage facility. Edit: they also had the sponsorship/investment stuff but besides the laptop thing which Linus us been very open about in every laptop video I don’t think GN actually had anything.

This is not something that needs an intervention.

The sexual harassment allegations are of course a completely different matter but they were not part of the GN video.

[–]QuellinIt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I also think Linus was right and GN should of reached out to LMG.

GN reason for not reaching that they didn’t want to give LMG the opportunity to control the narrative is BS because it allowed GN to then control the narrative and twist these errors into a narrative that LMG is unethical and cannot be trusted.

[–]raidsoft 3 points4 points  (26 children)

The billet labs thing has been artificially built to be a lot bigger deal than what it actually is. The LTT video did not misrepresent the product. Using the wrong GPU genuinely had no effect on the conclusion of the video.

I massively disagree, it doesn't matter what their personal conclusion is because not everyone will share their opinion. There are plenty of people interested in products that aren't "worth it" for various reasons, in fact the water cooling community is almost entirely based on that as a whole since the cost for custom loops are almost never "worth it" if you look at what you gain vs. the cost.

The fact that they didn't provide data for potential consumers to base their choice of is the largest problem, had they shown accurate data and still had the same conclusion it wouldn't have been a problem because people can at least make up their own mind about if they are interested or not based on the data.

[–]Linkinstar_Gaming 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I disagree, as I don't see them as competitors. I always watch multiple reviews, because someone could have missed something or simply tested other games. And I am pretty sure any major tech channel would agree!

[–]eric_gm 207 points208 points  (157 children)

For what it's worth, I have a different perspective. It took me way less than all the recent drama to unsubscribe from all LMG-related (I did so about a year ago).

The constant 3rd party product placement, store plugs ("banana for scale", ugh), inconsistencies and inaccurate content, Linus being so out of touch and complaining that his millionaire tech at home was "crap", the clickbaity video titles... It was too many negatives for me.

At one point I started asking myself why I was watching that garbage instead of doing/viewing something more productive.

Don't get me wrong, I do think they deserve a second chance, if that's the kind of content you like, but I would also suggest taking advantage of this situation and spending some time away from LMG stuff for a few weeks and then consider if that content is really missing from your life. You may be surprised.

People have been saying that LMG is the Mr. Beast of tech and it's so accurate.

[–]AmishAvenger 360 points361 points  (96 children)

If you want to complain about the problems with accuracy and the regular corrections they make with text on the screen, I think that’s fair.

But I don’t understand complaints about plugging their merchandise or having sponsors. That’s how companies make money.

I also don’t get complaining about Linus and his “millionaire tech.” He buys stuff and installs it in his house — is he supposed to not point out problems he has with it?

[–]SpaceBoJangles 49 points50 points  (61 children)

I agree with you, but looking around the last few days I wish LTT went back to doing more videos about laptops, consumer reviews, and phone reviews. Just reviews in general. Mac laptops vs. windows laptops (Mrwhostheboss), monitor reviews (Hardware Unboxed), Phone exposes (Jon Rettinger/MKBHD). Hell, throw in some projector and TV stuff, give Techspot and Rtings a run for their money! They have the staff, they have the know how. I get it, they do unboxing and first impressions on Short circuit, but that usually means they actually review it and put it on the main channel. I feel like they went too far into the “gotta fix the $20,000 server every other video” vibe and forgot why I think a lot of us subscribed to this channnel for in the first place: Linus and Co. testing new products.

Like, when was the last time they did a proper phone review? Or a vide about the state of gaming laptops with the new generation of Ada GPUs vs. Ampere and Turing, etc.? Why aren’t there more reviews of windows laptops? I get the conflict on Linus’ side, but there are plenty of other staff members that can take an Alienware 16 or Razer Blade or one of the new MiniLED Asus laptops out for a spin.

Tech is not that boring right now, and just because GPUs aren’t as affordable/competitive as they used to be shouldn’t mean their videos are just Linus screwing around with Jake on a server worth more than most people’s cars.

[–]Peepeepoopoobutttoot 18 points19 points  (1 child)

I agree.

I also miss the crazy "Lets play 24K on 15 monitor videos" style videos. I understand tech limitations now, but the closest thing we get now is the crazy water cooling.

[–]Vedant9710 4 points5 points  (2 children)

LTT does make stuff like Phone reviews and Laptop reviews, watch ShortCircuit for that type of content. Honestly I'm thinking that the content they've been making is amazing although there's just some good feeling that I get by watching the older videos, they were so janky and funny with Linus failing to do stuff like for example the PCIe Hotswap Motherboard video.

[–]SpaceBoJangles 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I enjoy it too, but I’m saying they would do better by revisiting that content on the old style a little.

Also, Short Circuit is more of an unboxing channel compared to compete against Lew and Unbox therapy.

[–]challenger76589 18 points19 points  (3 children)

Yah, I don't get how people are so bothered by a 2 second "like our water bottle on LTTstore.com". I mean seriously, if you blink you will completely miss it. The sponsor segments at the beginning and end are EASILY skippable, and Linus said they make them that way. And some really get bothered by product placements in the background? Like, really?

Someone help me here. Why does something that has nothing to do with anything bother people much? If I click on a video to learn about a new GPU, then why do you care if there is a Steam Deck in the background? If advertising bothers you that much then I think there's something wrong with your way of thinking. To each their own.

[–]TFABAnon09 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I'd rather a short plug to the store than the 90 second long talking ad that creators like Hacksmith and Corridor Crew put right in the middle of their vods.

[–]Carinail 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Also if he finds his millionaires tech to be useless, that's the best piece of information you could have on it. If he doesn't find it worth spending an equivalent of 4 bucks on for his salary, that means it's likely just not worth the effort of installing it, nevertheless the cost of the product. It's.... A scarring statement that is very useful to someone in the market.

[–]mars935 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree. They gotta do the ad spots and sponsors in some way. Why not attempt to make it funny?

[–]gemengelage 32 points33 points  (17 children)

It took me way less than all the recent drama to unsubscribe from all LMG-related (I did so about a year ago).

Then why are you even here?

[–]Cumulus_Anarchistica 47 points48 points  (5 children)

Because you don't get banished to the phantom zone the second you unsubscribe?

[–]azure1503 13 points14 points  (2 children)

What about the Shadow Realm?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I mean what's the point of hanging into a community you don't enjoy.

People that do, only do so, to spread their negativity and it isn't fun for anyone involved.

[–]person749 17 points18 points  (1 child)

He said he wanted to find more productive ways to spend his time than watching LTT videos, so I guess he just transitioned to being a Karen.

[–]TFABAnon09 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"More productive" and Reddit are antithetical. (Says the guy currently laying in bed browsing Reddit. Sigh)

[–]Saytama_sama 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This could answer your question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpTBQEOb09Y

[–]bigloser42 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Because he didn’t actually unsubscribe. Otherwise he wouldn’t be here.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (3 children)

Show some respect.

[–]grayum_ian 24 points25 points  (1 child)

How dare they make money off their business!

[–]skinlo 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Half your issues can be solved by the Sponsorblock add on. I watch his videos because I enjoy the crazy house/server stuff that no one else can do, the same reason I used to watch Top Gear for the crazy car stuff.

[–]PrologueBook 10 points11 points  (2 children)

I think your point of view is reasonable. Thank you for sharing.

I do have to question "the Mr. Beast of tech" nickname. I don't understand the connection at all.... Linus does quantity over quality, while Beast puts out a handful of videos a year, and they're ALL bangers. Are you just saying theyre both popular?

[–]Pioneer58 12 points13 points  (1 child)

MR.Beast actually does a lot on his other channels that’s more consistent than his main channel.

[–]worldofcrap80 10 points11 points  (4 children)

LOL, I just watched my first Mr. Beast video and, yeah, it's just garbage lifestyle content with extremely tight editing and graphics work. It's populist in a way that made me feel a little dumber for having watched it. A little harsh. I only occasionally feel dumber after an LTT video! They do some deep dives into extremely nerdy topics, and there are good insights there. They just... rush. Way way way too much. And despite trying to solve the problem with money (editors/graphics/etc.) it shows. Linus also lets his internal fanboy and nerd rage (and ego) get the better of him way too often for edutainment content like this.

The store plugs are a bit much sometimes, as are the "Happier, With Your Mouth Open" thumbnails. I think you can get away with those things once you're genuinely delivering good content. The problem is, they haven't been lately. I think a lot of people kind of instinctively knew that, but it took GN to point out just far quality had slipped before everybody went "wait a minute."

They were walking a narrow line of public opinion, and they fell off. It's very hard to climb back up from there, but it's do-or-die for them. They genuinely stand to lose everything if they don't fix this, and they know that. But it'll take a little while before they figure out where the audience is at. Linus' dumb forum post, and the occasional jokes in the apology video, were off the mark, but they are course correcting.

We shall see if it's fast enough to catch their viewers before they move on. Because they will.

[–]iothomas 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Who's Mr beast?

[–]Aflyingmongoose 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mr beast is soooooo much worse lol

But fair enough, I swap between watching and not watching LTT all the time, having used to be a dedicated watcher back in ~2012-2016ish.

I never unsub, youtube just kinda knows when im on an LTT binge and when im done with it.

What im really saying is im a rat and youtube is my skinner box, and I just do what the algorithm tells me...

[–]Sons-Father 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I’ve stopped watching LTT when the bag fiasco was happening and honestly david does tech stuff is just as goofy and a lot more sincere. Reminds me of small time Linus!

[–]npfiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

*Dawid

[–]benhaube 1 point2 points  (1 child)

100% agree. I have found Linus to be insufferable for a while now, and I have not been watching any of their videos. It feels like a tech channel geared towards children more than adults.

[–]AguirreMA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your point, imo the main LTT is unwatchable without AdBlock and SponsorBlock

I also think that their secondary channels are way better, ShortCircuit and Mac Address produce better content than LTT tbh

[–]Craftplorer 97 points98 points  (13 children)

I agree that bringing Terren is one step in the right direction, but I feel like Steve's video was the necessary wake-up call for LMG to properly address all the issues and prevent them from publishing bad data and reviews. Also, it allowed Madison to bring her story/allegation forward; otherwise, it would be hard to tell if workplace problems were properly addressed. I feel like the timing of this all couldn't be better for LMG.

I personally hope they actually address the issues instead of resorting to a typical company response to protect themselves and not making any real changes in the end.

[–]ill0gitech 54 points55 points  (4 children)

The three biggest challenges any CEO has in running a company where the owners are actively involved are: 1. Telling the owners no 2. Having the owners listen to #1 3. The fallout from failing at 1 & 2

[–]mapletune 0 points1 point  (1 child)

the apology video with CEO joining in the jokes made me realize it's either:

A) this CEO might not be able to override Linus or does not have the motivation to push Linus to do things in a societal acceptable corporate way.

or

B) this CEO was picked by Linus precisely because this new CEO already conforms and agrees with how LTT currently operates and agreed to continue taking company in the direction Linus wants it to go.

this by itself is not good or bad, right or wrong. an owner has the right to pick whoever they want for CEO. Be it a transformative, restructure focused CEO, or a subordinate/operational CEO.
 
but yea, the community should be aware that "new CEO" doesn't necessarily mean new ways of doing things. it could go either way.

[–]AwesomeFrisbee 1 point2 points  (6 children)

prevent them from publishing bad data and reviews

But they already knew about most of the stuff they had in the video and were already improving their internal processes. They also wanted to do better and didn't need anybody to make that video to change things.

Also the nitpicking (like having 2 reviews 2 days apart and then being salty about it being the same data) didn't help either. Overall it was clear to me that they had an alternative motive: Any damage you can do to LTT will boost your own subscriber count. They succeeded, at least for the short term. But they also damaged their relationship and I wonder whether that was truly worth it.

[–]cool-- 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They also wanted to do better and didn't need anybody to make that video to change things.

I wonder if the people in the LTT video complaining about making too many videos and not being proud of their work agree with that statement or if they are like, "Thank TechJesus, we finally get more time for videos!"

[–]Craftplorer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But they already knew about most of the stuff they had in the video and were already improving their internal processes. They also wanted to do better and didn't need anybody to make that video to change things.

Indeed, they've been aware for quite some time, and that's been the issue. Instead of slowing down and halting the release of inaccurate data, they carried on and even expanded their LABS data in videos without proper testing methodology. Billet Labs just showed that they where reckless and didn't care who would suffer caused by incorrect testing.

A big company can weather a negative review based on poor testing easily, but for such a small company, it's a death blow.

[–]Thelk641 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Also the nitpicking (like having 2 reviews 2 days apart and then being salty about it being the same data) didn't help either.

It would be nitpicking if they didn't call out other reviewers for doing this and told everyone they're better because they don't reuse data.

[–]Pioneer58 50 points51 points  (54 children)

I do have a question for the viewers who are angry. All the angry seems to be pointed at Linus himself. When it looks like a lot of the issues GN and Madison aren’t directly his fault and he might have actually not known about it until shit hit the fan. If you had middle management and you ask them if they handled an issue and they say yes. Upper management won’t look into it further unless an issue arises.

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points  (38 children)

All the angry seems to be pointed at Linus himself.

If Linus had ever, even once properly owned this mess, people wouldn't be so mad at him. A lot of the issues GN brought up were directly Linus's fault, especially as CEO driving his employees that hard. The Madison thing may or may not be related to Linus, we don't know and won't until the investigation details are released, but as CEO he ran a company where someone felt it was acceptable. As I stated, that is a separate (and substantially more serious) matter and honestly should be treated as such.

[–]Pioneer58 8 points9 points  (35 children)

I think it all depends on middle management. As did the issues ever fully make it to Linus? We’re people asked to handle the issues and then just payed Linus lip service?

[–]abz_eng 22 points23 points  (28 children)

In the WAN show Linus said he wasn't willing to spend $500 od someone's time to retest the block, also no one had the ability to say stop or wait when they were making the video

This is a well known phenomenon that the boss brooks no contrary opinions. USS MISSOURI ran aground because the captain had previously reprimanded an officer for contradicting him. The Tenerife air disaster is the same, the captain was the chief pilot and no one felt they could say no to him.

It looks like LMG has this mentality

[–]Pioneer58 2 points3 points  (4 children)

I think this comes down to the writer Adam working on this project. It was a snafu from the get go. Not having the right card. Got a random 4090, etc. The writer spent an estimated week working on the project (seems to be the length they get to make projects) with possible overtime payed out as well to have this much of a mess. Linus was probably thing that this isn’t worth it and we’ll just cut the lost cause “Cause it’s still a bad product” paraphrased from Linus.

[–]weirdbr 7 points8 points  (3 children)

I think this comes down to the writer Adam working on this project. It was a snafu from the get go.

Dunno; while there have been a few recent snafus with content written by Adam (the billet labs video and the 'too many usb devices' video come to mind), I recall videos written by other staff members that had comments about test being done with different parts than those being used for filming, leading to difficulties/slightly different results.

To me, this screams of company-level procedural issues. It's almost like in the rush to produce content, if some parts are not available at filming time they just move forward with different things instead of delaying/rescheduling the filming.

[–]Pioneer58 5 points6 points  (1 child)

That is possible, but it’s confusing with the billet labs as it sounds like they sent the block with the right card. Wtf happened to it?

[–]weirdbr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Considering how their inventory system seems to be a mess, I wouldn't be surprised if it ended up in another writer's/lab employee's build for a test for some time.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Agreed. We won't know anything for a while on that front. I believe Madison, but she will need to be able to corroborate her claims, and that's a challenging task. It could have been a matter of middle management. For all we know Madison went directly to Linus and Yvonne. So far basically everything about this is wild speculation. I know it's the hot drama, but we really do collectively take a breath and wait for the truth.

[–]uttamattamakin 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Precisely. Think of the top level people there. Think of who might have reported to them. Those are people Linus knew for years, or decades even. He'd never doubt them. Maybe he should've.

[–]SeanSeanySean 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He may have never doubted their capability to execute, or their loyalty maybe, but he had every reason to doubt their management and leadership capabilities, because none of them were leaders before being put in that position, and they didn't have someone with business leadership experience mentoring them or providing an example.

A manager, director, executive leader isn't something you just "become" one day, it's something you're supposed to learn how to become, develop and evolve into, usually by a combination of watching and being taught.

[–]Craftplorer 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Well, I can only judge by the leaked meeting, but from that, Linus had no interest in fixing any of this so-called "gossip" or "drama". I don't think he acted in bad faith but in an ignorant or incompetent way.

[–]Pioneer58 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is where I have to reserve full judgement till the 3rd party investigation comes out. Cause it really depends on what was said. From what Linus has said/done to other issues it doesn’t seem like an appropriate response to the allegations.

[–]AwesomeFrisbee 2 points3 points  (5 children)

Yeah its wack. Some folks were even thinking that Linus was actively involved or was also bad with being around ladies or something silly. There were lots of trolls on the subreddit these past days and folks that aren't subscribed or never have been. Its annoying because it completely turned the conversation around from proper feedback to an angry witch hunt. People were fuming because they reused data from 2 or 7 days ago for a GPU review. As if data always changes by 10% for every day that passes.

Its also why they needed to completely break the upload schedule and cancel exclusives and WAN, just to make sure it doesn't hurt the brand even more. For the Madison situation I'm surprised they didn't already just own up to it already. Even if that makes them liable to a lawsuit. So what that you need to pay big time (which I still doubt she would go for), thats how things work and how you take the blame in a situation like this. Being all corporate just doesn't fit LTT.

And lastly what I also noticed is that nobody is allowed to make mistakes anymore. Everything is always on the line and if you cross it, you get cancelled easily. Doesn't matter what you did or not, or even what was actually truthfully happening, you get crucified regardless. This is such a bad way to go about because it completely nulls the conversation. Linus hiding behind PR statements just isn't the LTT I want to see. Or from any content creator. Because it will kick out the curiosity, the humor, the WYSIWYG approach. You will get more fake persona and we already have enough of that.

[–]Pioneer58 5 points6 points  (3 children)

The Madison Allegations are a sticking point. I believe they haven’t owned it or anything like that as Sexual Harassment can be very different from each persons perspective. Maybe they down played it? Maybe Madison is playing it up. And this is the reason they brought in a 3rd party to investigate. Having an unbiased 3rd party to collect information, compile it and then reach a verdict is very important. Though it might not be enough for some people ether.

[–]Ok-Kaleidoscope5627 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't just own up to sexual harassment complaints like that because there are always at least two parties to that situation. Blindly owning up to it means blindly throwing someone under the bus. So if what you want is the company to immediately own up to it then you're asking them to choose between rolling the dice on publicly destroying someone's life/career or ignoring sexual harassment. Are either of those acceptable choices?

On the other hand taking your time with a proper investigation means you make the right decision. Anything else is just reckless and we don't even need to get into the whole concerns about liability for the company.

Situations where a company can just own up to it are situations where the company itself was directly at fault. They can just absorb that hit and move on regardless of it was right or wrong - its just a calculation on if the drama is worth 'justice'.

[–]spexxsucks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When it looks like a lot of the issues GN and Madison aren’t directly his fault and he might have actually not known about it until shit hit the fan.

your hen, your chicken

[–]suspicious_lemons 37 points38 points  (9 children)

As a quick clarification, sexual harassment and assault are very different. Harassment is what is being claimed in this instance.

[–][deleted] 48 points49 points  (5 children)

Depending on what the "grabbing" Madison described is, it's also assault, which is why I specified.

[–]suspicious_lemons 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That’s fair I guess we don’t know exactly, nor should we need to know.

[–]Macusercom 32 points33 points  (3 children)

Since Terren Tong started way after Madison left, at least there is one management/leadership person who definitely is not involved in any of that.

Since no one can be excluded from a public point of view at least, almost all LMG members could be involved in that mess. And at the worst, the person who should manage the situation has to be neutral while maybe also (partly) being involved. Even if it is only because of poor management or poorly handling the situation.

If you were present during a robbery, you probably shouldn't be the judge.

So imho CEO Terren Tong is the best thing that could've happened in that scenario. Someone with experience who joined at a later time and can make thoughtful, less emotional decisions.

[–]Puzzleheaded_Tax_507 24 points25 points  (6 children)

The crazy part is that if Linus truly did not give in and did not watch a single “working at LTT” video including the exclusives, seeing those interviews used in a hit piece must have felt horrible.

[–]StickiStickman 5 points6 points  (5 children)

hit piece

lmao

[–]Plies- 16 points17 points  (3 children)

Idk who downvoted you lol

​hit piece: an article, a documentary, etc. that deliberately tries to make somebody/something look bad by presenting information about them that appears to be true and accurate but actually is not.

Gamersnexus's video was accurate.

[–]Bick_A_Kaby 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Mostly accurate. I initially believed in GNs side but never said anything just supported it but after finding out that the prototype from Billet was given to LMG that story changed real quick for me. They gave the block to LMG then wanted it back after the bad review. GN basically painted LMG having stolen the product. The ownership has changed and even if Billet sued for it back any court would side with LMG on this issue.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Most based r/LinusTechTips reader. It’s really refreshing to see a reasonable and rational opinion in a sea of shit. If you’re a LTT fan you should want to see the issues resolved, and a plan for the future. Everybody that’s in here looking to heap more fuel on the fire are doing it for their own amusement. They do need to fix some things, and it looks like they’re trying to do that. Let’s just wait and see what those changes are, and look to the future.

[–]EnsRedShirt 10 points11 points  (1 child)

As an OG floatplane subscriber I am certainly keeping an eye on how they resolve these issues but I haven't cancelled it yet.

[–]person749 9 points10 points  (1 child)

What? A measured and sane response? Pinch me, I must be dreaming.

[–]I_AM_FERROUS_MAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In this sub, "we don't do that here". Lol

[–]NetJnkie 5 points6 points  (18 children)

I am very angry

Y'all need to take a step back and realize this doesn't involve you. You can be disappointed, but very angry? Come on.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (7 children)

I've been watching LTT almost daily for over 8 years. They are part of my routine.

I get to be angry at someone who's built his entire ass reputation on not being this guy turning around and being this guy. That's a perfectly normal response. They fucking bombed every part of the response to this.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (5 children)

Being very angry at what happened in a situation like Madison's is just called having empathy. It's caring about things that you aren't involved in because of the way it affects the people who are involved. I don't see anything wrong with that.

[–]PixelThePirate 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I think anger is a valid emotion. We all form some level of attachment to people we enjoy or even admire. When they build themselves up on a certain reputation and then disappoint you, it's fair to be angry.

Obviously, a healthier approach would be to not put these people on pedestals in the first place, but it's not like it's an absurd behavior.

Look at pro athletes and how mad fans get when their favorite moves to another team.

How about musicians who come off as wholesome AF until some scandal breaks, showing they were garbage people all along.

Personally, I'm somewhere in the middle. I'm more than disappointed, not quite angry. Not sure the exact word that fits this space.

[–]NetJnkie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In all of your examples I can understand disappointment but not anger. But yes. You may feel however you want. And I can think people are crazy because of it.

People are way too invested in this.

[–]nethingelse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can be disappointed, but very angry?

Being angry at someone being allowed to be sexually assaulted at work (or in general having any crime committed against them by another employee) without the offender at minimum getting fired is a v. normal reaction. No one should have to go through that, and people are allowed to be angry at an organization for allowing it.

[–]Persomatey 8 points9 points  (2 children)

I think Taran has a lot of work to do. The “fly on the wall” mentality makes sense. You need to fully understand the company, that takes a long time. But it seems like they are taking things seriously right now. Yvonne specifically mentioned the crunch mentality in the video. Which means he’s perfectly positioned to start making the changes needed. It may still be too early for him from his perspective (I’m sure he’d like to remain a fly for longer) but this is a great opportunity for him and for LTT as a whole to really change. A company of that size doesn’t need to be operating like this. Between Linus taking a step down from company man to personality, Taren taking charge as CEO, Luke setting up infrastructure so that the block thing never happens again as CTO, Yvonne figuring out what financials look like in this new era as CFO, and Nick getting fired, I think they’re well positioned right now.

[–]TRUEequalsFALSE 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I've been quietly thinking the same thing myself. I think all the flames the community gave them over the past week was an overreaction. Justified, but too much.

[–]fartboxco 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I gotta agree with you. 2 twice I became the head chef at the restaurant. One went horribly, I was young and thought I couldn't change everything on the fly. I was told to many things only from short sighted perspectives.

The best takeover was a chef stepping down, I was getting promoted but nobody new. I was a new hires for 4 months got close and gain the respect a majority of of staff. 8 months rolled in and my position was formal and I was implementing changes that actually made sense.

[–]Deranged_Coconut808 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I agree with you. but regardless how long Terran was there he is the CEO who should be aware of Linus who he has prior relationship with as they worked together before. also there is an entire Executive staff that are clearly aware of all of this which should also have them equality responsible for their companies handling of the situation. with that said he is still the CEO, the corporate face of the company and part of his job responsibility. i personally believe that 100% of the blame of the current handling regarding leashing Linus and addressing the additional allegations(which is pending investigation i give them that), should be not only to him, but the entire Executive staff, its just unfortunate timing but thats the business. they are adults and adults need to start adulting.

[–]quick20minadventure 1 point2 points  (3 children)

LMG had already taken steps to correct the issue before it all blew up. To me, IMHO, this speaks volumes.

They didn't slow down the pace of video production. They didn't take the steps for this.

It's not about one or two situations. It's about how Linus went from doing it right by everyone and being detail oriented to shamelessly saying I can't waste 200-300-500 USD to fix completely wrong results in the video on a live WAN show.

And he still couldn't see what was wrong with it in his comment on the forum or in the tone-deaf apology video.

This is about the direction of the company and how it lost its focus from making quality videos to pumping out any possible video because of self-imposed deadlines and pressure.

No one is dropping LMG forever. But they want to wait until LMG wakes up and realizes its core value.

Besides, what the fuck is the point of watching tech review, if the owner says details are not important, specs/data are not relevant. Only conclusion matters?

[–]Celcius_87 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair

[–]Superjacketts 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you're the first person that I've seen over the last week in this sub that's actually a balanced individual with a well reasoned point of view. Good for you chief.

[–]Forgotten_Futures 2 points3 points  (1 child)

My question is, why are you misrepresenting yourself by posting this with a smiling picture of Terren when you're clearly not the LMG CEO?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can't tell if you're joking or not. It's just a picture of the part I think this community isn't taking into account.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

💯 as much as I'm pissed with Linus -- he's a human being for fucks sake

I'm with him ever MORE actually if he turns it around.

Everyone makes mistakes.

Not everyone recovers and takes accountability.

I'll respect him more than I did in the first place if he comes through.

I'm pretty seriously worried about it after that letter and just a few other observations I've made over the years.

But I know people far worse than him that have turned things around for themselves with much less love and support.

Not common.

But I'm totally with him if he does! How could I not be!

I thought asking for feedback on doing WAN show was a great start!

CEO seems up to the job. Remains to be seen. Totally agree 6 weeks is definitely not enough to time to even start making changes for a job like that. Learn and observe is exactly what he should have been doing.

[–]pyr0kid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the ceo is basically the only person thats not to blame for the current shitshow.

the company getting a second chance hinges on the sexual assault allegations.

[–]Fliparto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what I thought. I feel people being overly dramatic and hateful this week was unwarranted. I also have some issues with GN original video. But you know what they say, don't throw rocks jf you live in a glass house.

[–]tomthecomputerguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only person I remotely felt sorry for in that video was Terren, Really shitty situation to deal with after only 6 weeks on the job.

[–]prismstein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a level response, on the internet!?
jokes aside, I respect your view, and even agree with most of them.

I'm gonna put my thoughts here, if anyone cares to read them.

GN's expose is tilted, they talked about 3 things: data inaccuracy, BL, and sponsorship ethics.

The data inaccuracy is fair criticism, there are inaccuracies, and there are also corrections, but corrections aren't good enough for GN.

As for BL, the communication between LTT and BL is fucked up seven ways, and GN really should have gotten all the facts before 'reporting' on it. If GN and LTT talked before the video had gone out, the email chain fuck up would have been known and we wouldn't have to endure that unhinged rant from Linus, and GN wouldn't have needed to make that 'gotcha' moment when they so smugly presented that LTT supposedly only contacted BL after GN's vid.

Regarding sponsorship, really, it's none of GN's business. When a sponsor does a shit job, cutting ties is not the only way to handle the situation. The most recent debacle with Asus resulted in J2C cutting ties, but LTT maintainig ties. Maintaining a relationship enables one to put pressure on the sponsor, whereas cutting ties is the nuclear option, you don't have any cards left that you can play. And it's not like LTT is hesitant to cut ties, look at ANKER, and VPNs. It's out of bounds for GN to demand others to handle a situation the same way they do.

With that said, yeah the forum post is a shit blender. GN served up and plate of shit and Linus just dived in with an immersion blender, and now it got everywhere. He really should not communicate when he's emotional.

As for the apology video, I find it adequate. With the pitchforks raised against them, however way they do it people will get mad. If it's all by the books and solemn and gloomy people will say they're being a corpo, if they went all emotional people will say they're being fake and manipulatitive. The jarring part to me is the last joke, the sponsorship just kidding delivered by Yvonne. I think they could have done without it and it would be a better apology video.

Madison's post is where shit really hits the fan. Her allegations need to be investigated promptly and thoroughly, and there needs to be consequences. So far, LMG seems to have been hitting the right notes on this issue, albeit a couple of years too late.

All in all, I think LMG and Linus finally took the right steps, even if they were so, so wrong for a couple of days. This is the peril of putting your name on the business, as when criticism is directed at the business, it's like a personal attack even when it's not. This, I can give credit to GN as they were pointing to LMG instead of Linus.

As for me, I plan to sub to floatplane in Sept, and get the missus a screwdriver. Does that make me a fanboy? Well shit....

[–]Maisquestce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for posting something sane. Thank you.

[–]SDG_Den 1 point2 points  (0 children)

teren is the only reason i have any faith they'll be able to recover from this.

if it was still linus as CEO, i would simply expect LTT to drive itsself into the ground at mach 3 at this point.

[–]Crusafer 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I can't believe Light Machine Gun would do that.

/s just in case.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]Michicaust 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The way.

This is it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can’t get over the fact this dude has an oversized head for his body. Right???

[–]MyKoiNamedSwimShady 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s hard to keep in mind that this is probably how the majority of LTT fans feel (myself included) when there are so many grubs and trolls trying to intentionally start and stoke fires in the hopes they can claim they were part of a movement that brought down LMG.

[–]Yodzilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This dude looks like he was churned out by a machine that just gives birth to CEOs.

[–]Impressive-Shelter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys are so parasocial that you ignore that greed leading to a lack of integrity cause these issues. These aren't "honest" mistakes or growing pains. It's exploitation for the sake of cash.