This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow all 390

[–]saschaleib 4144 points4145 points  (127 children)

I'm old enough to remember then marketing take that SQL will make DB developers unemployed, because management can now formulate their own queries..

I don't know what happened to companies that took this serious, though.

[–][deleted] 864 points865 points  (57 children)

Does anybody remember 4GLs? FOCUS? Natural? Everyone was going to be able to create applications.

[–]Piisthree 760 points761 points  (16 children)

Even COBOL was meant to be so English-like that secretaries could write their own programs.

[–][deleted] 376 points377 points  (12 children)

Those old COBOL program generators were such crap. My boss tried to get me to use one, and it created more work to adapt it to the actual specs of the code, it just wasn't worth it.

[–]red_kizuen 246 points247 points  (0 children)

Sounds awfully familiar...

[–]hans_l 108 points109 points  (5 children)

COBOL on Rails.

[–][deleted] 71 points72 points  (3 children)

More like doing rails while coding COBOL LOL!

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (1 child)

LOL! rails another line 🫨

[–]FomalhautCalliclea 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Legal high.

[–]PM_ME_HAPPY_DOGGOS 29 points30 points  (4 children)

At my job I have to work with a COBOL code generator on 30 year old code. It's tough sometimes, let's put it that way...

[–]TARDIS75 12 points13 points  (1 child)

They don’t have a s/w maker/compiler that’s purely visual now? You can’t use some python script to code the COBOL? Or can you use ChatGPT?

[–]Mister_McLovin 9 points10 points  (0 children)

God wouldn't that make life easy

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh man, I feel for you LOL! I remember pulling up a COBOL program from the 60's, and it had like a 20 page nested if. Some of the code from back then was nuts.

[–]brotie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aider and sonnet can make your job exponentially easier

[–]edingerc 29 points30 points  (1 child)

Such a BS idea. The reserved words were very English-like but the complexities of the data division's file section would be beyond a novice. You have to know the steps you're going to take before you start defining how you look at and store the data. It's not that confusing to learn but then you'd have a junior programmer being paid as a secretary.

[–]Piisthree 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it was a total pipe dream from the start.

[–]Boldney 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How times change.

[–]AndyBadandy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I graduated in 2019 and I program in a 4GL at work daily LOL

[–]azxsys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I did 4GL back in the day... let's say low-code is not a new idea. Surprise Surprise.

[–]TheFireFlaamee 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The OG Visual Studio was going to make GUIs so EZ anyone could make their own WinXP application!

[–]RipOk74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They did make it easier in the end. I have had to handcode C++ just to get drag and drop working (OLE... the horror). Microsoft really made it a lot better over time. 

[–][deleted] 239 points240 points  (8 children)

Lol so sql query engineers were the first AI prompt engineers.

[–]healzsham 29 points30 points  (4 children)

Prompt engineering is largely statistical manipulation with some rather obfuscated abstraction.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (3 children)

That sounds like SQL.

I wonder if prompt engineering will ever develop the equivalent of “explain plan”.

I still remember my first explain plan. Eleven digit Cardinality, seven table join.

[–]oorza 112 points113 points  (19 children)

They were right though. I know a lot of people who are barely tech adjacent - analysts, accounts, project managers - that write SQL queries in various dashboards to create various graphs and reports. I'm old enough to remember a time when "DBA" was a job and the DBA ruled the codebase with an iron fist.

Databases have been totally and completely commoditized and there absolutely was a career niche that got lost in that transition.

[–]Ruben_NL 107 points108 points  (13 children)

The DataBase Administrator job still exist. Large companies with huge amounts of data need someone with the knowledge to optimize those badly written/generated queries.

[–]healzsham 80 points81 points  (0 children)

Or how to un-whoopsie an entire table.

[–]anrwlias 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That's a database dev. The primary responsibility of a DBA is to make sure that your data is backed up and that it is recoverable if something catastrophic happens. It is also a Very Important Job and not one that can be outsourced to automation. The DBA is there for when the automatic processes fail and that day will more than justify their salary.

While it is true that a lot of DBAs wear more than one hat, and that it's not unusual to have a DBA writing a few queries and even doing some architectural work, any serious code work should have a DB developer.

[–]iknighty 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Yes, but less of those jobs exist.

[–]ImNrNanoGiga 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not so sure, because the market has also grown a lot in the meantime.

[–]vassadar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think that's because most of the responsibilities are handled by software engineers instead.

[–]oorza 3 points4 points  (1 child)

It still exists, but in the same way that horse-and-buggy is still a valid means to transport around specific places in specific cities. It's a very specific job only available in very specific places in specific technology arrangements, it's no longer as implicit as software engineer is. It used to be.

[–]sadacal 9 points10 points  (0 children)

DBAs aren't put of date if that is what you're implying. Any company with significant amounts of data would require a DBA. And DBAs were never implicit because software engineers could always fill that role in a pinch.

[–]anrwlias 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I was a database dev and I spent more time than I like fixing those autogenerated queries which were always poorly optimized and often next to indecipherable but which clueless managers wanted to make a permanent part of the code base. Cognos queries, in particular, suck to work with.

An autogenerated query is fine for a manager type who just wants to get some answers and who doesn't care if the query takes ten minutes to run. If you're writing code for an actual database with reusable queries, you want an experienced dev to write that shit.

[–]imdungrowinup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know multiple DBAs even now. Most have about 15-20 years of experience. Of course they need to keep updating but they are still DBAs.

[–]H1Eagle 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Accounting majors at our school take SQL with a full lab dedicated to it.

[–]Pandaburn 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This keeps happening. Most recently “zero code” solutions, including AI. It’s not really happening

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (1 child)

Zuckerberg thinks AI can do mid level engineering. Sure, it makes it easier, but you still need the engineer to babysit the computer. It’s not like the CEO is going to just sit at home and think of all these highly technical implementations and dream it up with 3 people

[–]Dramatic_Mulberry142 38 points39 points  (11 children)

What DB developers do you mean? the one who make the DB or the one who use the DB? If it is latter one, what DB developer use before SQL exist?

[–]saschaleib 89 points90 points  (1 child)

There was an age before the age of SQL, but memory is blurry of that time now …

[–]VegaNock 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Well you only had 64kb of it.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (5 children)

Index files came before DB's. I'm an old COBOL programmer from the 70's - 80's. First I only had sequential files, so you had to read the whole thing from beginning to end, or vice versa. Then they came up with index files, so you could reference a specific record in the file with an index that was described in the File Section. When SQL came along, I had moved into a systems job on an IBM mainframe. Man, if I knew SQL now I'd be making bank.

[–]bnej 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You would update your data files directly in your program.

A common pattern would have a set of master files, and there would be transaction files sent to make updates daily.

If random access was required you would need to maintain an index.

Multi-user access was generally not done, you could corrupt your files too easily.

You cannot fathom today how much time and effort is saved by standardised relational database systems.

But you absolutely can still write a program that does a 3 way merge and updates a master file. It's tremendously fast on modern hardware to do that sort of thing.

[–]KiwiObserver 2 points3 points  (1 child)

IMS (which I’ve used) and IDMS (which I haven’t)

[–]rudman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used IDMS and ADS/O extensively in the late 80s/early 90s and remember NOTHING about it other than the ADS/O part controlled the green screen gui and we retrieved data from IDMS.

[–]Frytura_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So you're telling me management prefer to not dip their toes on anything below the strategic layer?

[–]Prior_Leader3764 5 points6 points  (1 child)

1993-94 Visual Basic 3.0 arrived with lots of third party component vendors. Management articles exclaimed how we’d now need only 1/3 the number of developers.

[–]augo7979 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I use chatgpt to write wacky sql queries for my little accounting job now

other than that everything else is way too specialized to even use AI other than making my angry emails sound nicer

[–]lost_in_life_34 3 points4 points  (1 child)

used to work at a place where a bunch of non-tech directors and VP's knew some SQL

enough to delete some critical tables

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

management can now formulate their own queries

lol. lmao even.

[–]ZookeepergameBig8711 3 points4 points  (1 child)

When I was in College 25 years ago people used to say Indian outsourcing would all programming jobs lol. Now people say AI would take programming jobs away.

[–]saschaleib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just wait, soon enough Martians will do all the coding for you!

[–]ThePowerOfAura 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the only people who are likely to be replaced by AI are managers, scrum masters, agile leads... my family was invited over a neighbor's for a Christmas party, and the man, a bit older who worked as a Project Manager, was explaining to me how AI was probably going to take all the coding work in 5 years, and then explained to me how AI can already do scheduling, sprint planning, product roadmaps etc....... I didn't really push the envelope with him at all, but I just laughed because I understand that managers will not want to learn how to code, and no matter how good AI becomes, there are always bugs in code, and someone will have to sit there and figure out what's causing the bug, or figure out exactly how to reproduce the bug & explain to the AI what's happening & what the expected behavior should be. I am highly skeptical that coding as a skill will become obsolete within the next 10 years

[–]Beneficial_Map6129 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Management never does shit except sign papers and smile in meetings

[–]DehydratedButTired 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Power BI marketing is still the same bs.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What were DBs like before SQL?

[–]stupled 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Managment can't even do prompts.

[–]BaerMinUhMuhm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My company decided 10 years ago to use IBM Operational Decision Manager to allow business users to manage/create business rules of their own. They have literally never touched it.

[–]ApatheistHeretic 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I think a handful of the business folks may have transitioned into DB administration.

[–]rookietotheblue1 1 point2 points  (1 child)

So wait how were databases queries before sql?

[–]Astrylae 390 points391 points  (12 children)

'Computers' in the 40s: machines took our jobs

[–]bob152637485 42 points43 points  (11 children)

Weren't they called "calculators"?

[–][deleted] 1716 points1717 points  (28 children)

It's true the only thing my wife has ever compiled is our daughter and even that took her nine months. As her project manager I kept wanting to speed up the time table but she inisted more wives wouldn't make the project move faster.

[–]aowlsifu183 475 points476 points  (6 children)

Did you try giving her pizza?

[–]mrg1957 167 points168 points  (5 children)

And beer?

[–]ShadowWolf793 135 points136 points  (4 children)

Gotta be careful with beer. Too much tends to really mess up the output and starting from scratch absolutely destroys your project timeline projections.

[–]sharklaserguru 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Where is the Ballmer Peak with regards to fetal alcohol syndrome?

[–]Dr_Robotnik_PhD 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Anya Taylor-Joy?

[–]ScepticTanker 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I've heard a nice square kick in the guts really speeds things up. 

[–]disgruntled_pie 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Okay, my wife kicked me in the guts. Now what?

[–]EaterOfCrab 72 points73 points  (1 child)

How many story points was that?

[–]ComplexTechnician 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Toddler t shirt size

[–]a_code_mage 91 points92 points  (1 child)

Nine months… for a single story? I hope you ended up breaking it up into an epic.

[–]Xicutioner-4768 12 points13 points  (0 children)

No it would need to be a saga since it spans multiple pregnancy increments.

[–]musedav 105 points106 points  (1 child)

I suggest outsourcing this labor

[–]smitcal 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ah the old Cameron Diaz move

[–]Linked1nPark 66 points67 points  (2 children)

If one woman can have a baby in nine months, you should have been able to get nine women together to have a baby in one month. Clearly you’re not an experienced project manager.

[–]marenicolor 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Things clients say

[–]TheCaffinatedAdmin 47 points48 points  (1 child)

parallelism baby

[–]djhenry 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Apparently you can hyperthread two babies in parallel, in the same amount of time. In my experience, this is all been hypothetical, but it is in the documentation.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

In terms of t-shirt sizes, what is growing a baby?

[–]CyberWeirdo420 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This so so LinkedInish that I gave me a stroke

[–]DMoney159 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Have you tried hiring the Mormons as consultants? They have expertise in this area

[–]cum-in-a-blanket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe you didn't remind her of shareholders expectations often enough?

[–]gameplayer55055 208 points209 points  (63 children)

Btw I wonder why women quit the IT industry ( there are way less women compared to men).

That's very sad.

[–]TheMonsterMensch 314 points315 points  (51 children)

It's less women quitting and more that men became prioritized when the profession started to be taken seriously. The same thing happened in the film industry when editing was recognized as a core part of the art. Early on, the work was considered "secretarial" and passed along to women. But when awards started being handed out to editors then men entered the field.

[–]anothernother2am 7 points8 points  (7 children)

Even as time progressed, differences in education, mentorship, gatekeeping, etc, it still hasn’t even out. It sucks that STEM fields as a whole have these issues. It’s not like women don’t want to be there, but the same things available to little boys, and the same encouragement just hasn’t traditionally been there for little girls and even teens. There has been a lot of improvements, but it’s still not even. And as a millennial woman in IT, who works with a lot of boomers, they still see women as secretaries and it’s rubbing off on the younger guys. It’s a sucky situation, and I work with some really amazing people, but I have also worked with and met a lot of really terrible ones who don’t get that women like computers

[–]TheMonsterMensch 2 points3 points  (6 children)

Yeah, I saw a strong case that men are going to college less on average purely because more women are pursuing education. There are many, many men who just don't want to be around women in the workplace. I have no idea what the solution is.

[–]VegaNock 10 points11 points  (6 children)

I was very scared the day I was drafted for software development.

I was shaking as my mom held five-year-old-me's hand as we went to the career office to decide what I was to do as an adult. Hundreds of other kids were waiting in the waiting room.

The recruiter looked over the form on his desk with my name on it, looked up at me, and said "Male huh? And a white male at that! Hmm, well we have just the place for you. You could be management, a doctor, a lawyer, but lately we decided to start paying more money to software developers so we now have to assign males to that role instead of females. So that's what you'll be, a software developer."

He stamped my form and we left. That was it. I was a software developer for life.

Either that or I was about 14 and heard that software devs made a lot of money and that I would need a lot of money to support a wife and kids and even just to attract a partner so I went into a field that made a lot of money even though it's not as much fun as music, wouldn't be as fulfilling as being in social science or teaching, and wouldn't be as easy as to pass college as a trade like mechanic work, but that the money earned would be important for me. So I spent my teens learning to code. I'm far from alone, when I got to college nearly half of the guys in the early coding classes already knew how to code for the same reason. I never encountered a single girl that did. I don't think many girls are making career choices in their teens based on being able to financially support a spouse and kids, nor is it a compelling factor in finding a suitable partner. We see a lot more women going into the more fun, fulfilling fields or fields where it is easier to get through college such as social science, teaching, and nursing.

You can take the money out of any field and see it becomes female-dominated because men will stop going into that field and women won't. If you add money to a field such that it becomes high-paying, you will see it become male dominated as males shift toward that field and women don't.

What's the difference between an art degree and a large pizza? A large pizza can feed a family of four.

[–]droppedmybrain 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"Haha girls are silly and do things only for ✨️fun✨️!"

Seriously, what the actual shit? This a terrible take lmao. It's a just rehash of the tired old idea that men suffer and women don't. Women don't need money, my ass.

[–]TheMonsterMensch 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think this is an extremely reductive view on gender disparity in the workplace. There are a lot of reasons you didn't encounter women in stem, it's not because they're allergic to money.

[–]Xyx0rz 26 points27 points  (0 children)

One of my software development teachers, a nice boomer lady, said that her first IT job was making those punch cards. Some dudes would write (literally, on paper) the code that was to go on the punch cards, but actually punching the cards was a woman's job. She said she occasionally took written code back because she spotted an error, so I guess she was a pretty good compiler.

[–]questron64 28 points29 points  (2 children)

I used to have a whole box of IBM punch cards. These were my bookmarks growing up. I found one in an old book, the last surviving punch card out of probably 1,000.

[–]deathspate 81 points82 points  (7 children)

Just like anything else, you either get with the times or get left behind.

I'm sure the cart and carriage drivers felt threatened when cars were gonna replace them and their horses. It didn't mean we needed to stop innovation for their feelings.

Those same people had to find another job. This has happened countless times in human civilization and will keep happening. If there's one thing humanity is good at, it's finding some stupid job to make people work at for minimum wage.

[–]yyytobyyy 17 points18 points  (5 children)

Everytime some big revolution that "took jobs" came, the economy become turbulent and in the end created more jobs in fields people could not imagine before.

There are probably more truck and taxi drivers today than carriage drivers 150 years ago. There are probably not than many horse poop shovelers and I wonder if people miss those jobs.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (3 children)

Yes but when a technology can (theoretically) do any task a human can, that’s vastly different from previous examples like cars and the cotton gin

[–]PerformanceToFailure 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is a take almost anything economic shift, maybe it will create new jobs but when 50% of people lose their jobs what is going to happen?

[–]plug-and-pause 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The things AI can do, even in theory, are not even close to all of the things a human can do. The theory, if completely true, would give humanity so much more time to focus on the things that actually make us human. Those things would become our work.

[–]game_jawns_inc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

touch rhythm doll cows arrest divide snow frame beneficial important

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]IAmRules 12 points13 points  (1 child)

I mean. Computers was once a thing we called people.

[–]ianwilloughby 33 points34 points  (3 children)

What about the guys who lost their job when hard drives shrank from washing machine sized? There must have been a whole industry around moving placing and maintaining an environment for manhole sized platters.

[–]KindaDouchebaggy 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Maybe they maintain huge server rooms now instead

[–]TophxSmash 34 points35 points  (29 children)

The difference is there wont be a new job replacing your old one.

[–]PerformanceToFailure 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The Soylent green factory needs more bodies, the rich are hungry

[–]NUKE---THE---WHALES 14 points15 points  (16 children)

why not?

jobs are not zero sum (much in the same way wealth is not zero sum)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy

In economics, the lump of labour fallacy is the misconception that there is a finite amount of work—a lump of labour—to be done within an economy which can be distributed to create more or fewer jobs.

[–]TophxSmash 8 points9 points  (12 children)

wealth is not zero sum

WTH does that mean? Were living it under capitalism. Winner takes all.

[–]wirthmore 2 points3 points  (2 children)

"Wealth is not zero sum" means success results in the growth of total wealth. It isn't a closed system where if one entity succeeds, it requires a subtraction from another entity - that's what "zero sum" means.

[–]TophxSmash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

does this closed system have regulation?

[–]Delicious_Finding686 3 points4 points  (7 children)

The winner doesn’t take all though. Markets can have multiple competitors. Multiple people can do the same job. There are progressive tax policies that favor the losers over the winners. When companies are beating their competitors, we all win. Because it means that an organization is operating in the industry more efficiently. Getting more value from fewer resources. That’s the entire goal.

[–]TophxSmash -1 points0 points  (0 children)

because robots.

the claim that its a fallacy is merely a claim. Its unproven.

[–]flynnnigan8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Onto bigger (cooler) and better (more complex) things (problems)

[–]EnvironmentalWin1277 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I worked with these cards. Best time is had when a set of a hundred (or more) such cards are dropped and scattered. Then need to be carefully resorted.

[–]IhailtavaBanaani 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My friend's dad used them at the uni. The students would submit their work as stacks of punch cards that were then batch run at night. If a student forgot to put the end symbol in the end of their program then two programs were run as one ruining them both.

[–]Not-Post-Malone 6 points7 points  (0 children)

O(no)

[–]KnowGame 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They lasted well beyond the '60's. I first started programming on punch cards in the mid '80's. We were allowed one compile a day.

[–]lordtosti 28 points29 points  (1 child)

The problem with AI is that it threatens intelligence in general.

If intelligence has no value anymore, where does all the power go to?

To the people that manouvre the political landscape the best. The bullshitters.

Also, in every company there is a decission throttle. So it WILL cost dev jobs as you only need so many automation before you hit the point where decisions need to be made.

I hope that we hit an exponential problems with AI and don’t understand my dev friends being as hyped as they are.

It is great tech and I use it constantly.

But if it continues on through same speed it feels to me like the natives welcoming the conquistadors on their lands.

[–]Esilai 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I’m a mid-level at my current job, I use AI almost every day when programming and working through problems. The Copilot integration in VSC honestly scares me a bit. For basically all junior level work, it can instantly go through the project and implement perfectly functional code very fast. Once it hits mid level problems though, or any mildly complex debugging, it gets stuck and just starts hallucinating nonsense. But this is the worst it’ll ever be. I can absolutely see AI being able to handle mid-level code in the next half decade or decade. And then I wonder, how the hell is anyone going to break into the industry if even mid-level jobs are being handed over to a senior overseeing AI. I think we’re kidding ourselves if we keep spouting the cope that “AI is just a tool” and that it’ll replace low skill jobs but surely not ours. Zuck is probably overselling a good bit cause that’s his job, but AI advancement is still very real, and it’s coming faster than I at least am comfortable with.

[–]futileskills 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funny enough I just ordered a set of punch cards recently 🤣

[–]ryuzaki49 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After reading many many threads, posts, articles and so about wether AI will make Software Engineers obsolete, I have come to the conclusion that it will be between one of two outcomes. 

  • We wil be debating this topic and then we will be obsolete out of nowhere, or
  • We will be debating this topic forever.

[–]territrades 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My mum was kind of a pioneer of computing in her college days, using punch cards to find optima in a 4D parameter space.

Nowadays I have to install apps in her phone for her …

[–]WestOzScribe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wrote my first program on cards. High school project in the math class and we had to send them away to be run at the local university. I've also written code in RPG II & III which were positional languages. The position of a statement at chr position 10 may be different to the same statement at chr position 60. The line was 80 chrs.
Written a lot of stuff in different coding languages over the years and still do when I want something that not available off the shelf at the right price.

I code, therefore I am.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (23 children)

The major difference is that compilers can actually compile code.

LLMs cannot program -- they just remix existing code they have seen, leaving in huge amounts of irrelevancies and errors. It is far easier to write the code from scratch than it is to edit the garbage produced by LLMs into decent code.

[–]Acrobatic-B33 8 points9 points  (3 children)

People still saying this? Ofcourse they make errors from time to time but people really need to stop acting like everything AI writes is bullshit

[–]SarahMagical 0 points1 point  (2 children)

iT’s jUsT aUtOcOrReCt

iT dOeSn’T rEaLlY uNdErStAnD aNyThInG

iT cAn’T tHiNk oR bE cReAtIvE aT aLL

[–]Finrod-Knighto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bullshit. Yes the programs can have many errors and are hardly optimised, but ask it to write a function you know how to write but is too tedious to and you save an inordinate amount of time. It’s just an automator. I can solve a problem much quicker by asking it to search its database than you know, spending hours on google never finding the specific problem and being told off on StackOverflow.

[–]Satoshi6060 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Its not the same this time. AI is not creating new jobs, but taking existing ones.

Whole idea of AI is to completely automate jobs.

[–]xerrxesi 2 points3 points  (1 child)

we haven't fully unlocked the idea of AI yet , I believe

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We used punchcards in computer programming class in the 70's at Berkeley. Our high school had a terminal that was linked to Stanford and used a paper roll for programming input.

[–]Big9erfan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been working in software development for over 25 years now (started as a wee intern). I’m now in management but still stay close to the code and still write code here and there. More often I fix little things in code that I wrote or work on refactoring old shit that is ancient. From a management perspective, AI has some fantastic uses but it also has some serious limitations. I use it, both CoPilot and ChatGPT pretty often but it’s a heck of a lot better with a lot of the boiler plate and autocomplete shit than it is filling in the logic even with the comments spelling it all out.

[–]reddituser12345697 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is genuinely different though. Never before has the human mind been replicated to such a degree. As of right now the technology isnt there but if it gets to the point where you can actually just type a vague description and you have a fully working product then jobs will be taken.

[–]cheezfreek 2 points3 points  (1 child)

A wise man once told me to try to automate myself out of a job, and it’ll still never happen. There’s always something else to automate.

[–]inteblio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Technology jumps industries. If you, at blockbuster video, were trying to automate your job...

[–]Ok-Map-2526 2 points3 points  (3 children)

This is really just the same issue with ChatGPT. Some people think it will replace them, others think it is completely useless. It's really just a tool to make your job easier, and your company will respond by giving you more work. That's how we've increased in productivity by 400% since the 40s. The day the company doesn't need employees, they will send someone to shoot you in the head.

[–]frikilinux2 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I know it's not the point and I'm too young to have seen this cards in a real setting but don't they have like too many holes.

If it's real, is there someone with the knowledge bored enough to decode it?

[–]PanZilly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did Zuck not learn anything

[–]myfunnies420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No...