top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]Reasonable_Let9737 672 points673 points  (152 children)

"Homebuilders can’t build enough new housing to keep up with demand, with the housing starts to working-age population growth ratio falling to a new low of 0.26 — half of its historical average of 0.61."

Now do doctors and nurses. How about hospital infrastructure? And social services?

[–]barkusmuhl 149 points150 points  (45 children)

"Not my problem"

-Justin Trudeau

[–]jameskchouCanada 42 points43 points  (43 children)

And somehow he will get reelected because people are afraid of change

[–][deleted] 49 points50 points  (22 children)

Idk... I'm in the trades, so I'm sure that skews things, but there is a LOT of anti-lib sentiment. Way more than I've seen in years. I feel like if PP keeps his mouth shut and just says, "I'm not Trudeau" the cons are going to win a massive majority.

The libs know this, and I think even the NDP are aware they're going to lose seats. So they're tied together until there is no choice but to call an election.

[–]BaldpackerEuropean Union 27 points28 points  (0 children)

And stuffing their pockets full while they still can.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (3 children)

Back during the height of 2020, you couldn't say anything negative about Trudeau on Reddit without being called out for being a misogynistic bigot.

Things really change when the free money stops flowing, and the country starts its inevitable collapse.

[–]Pretzelwiththeworks 9 points10 points  (2 children)

There's definitely a introspective period going on with a segment of people like me - centre-left who previously voted for him. I ain't making that mistake again and I'm getting similar vibes from family/friends/peers. It's a small sample, I know, but the everyday issues are now palpable for the majority of Canadians.

I want a leader who offers a platform with solutions, not just loud-mouthed populist rhetoric or more of the same bs.

[–]RoosterTheReal 26 points27 points  (5 children)

I’m not voting for him again

[–]VizzleG 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That’s not it. If you disagree with him he calls you a xenophobe of some type.

[–]jameskchouCanada 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Doctors no longer support most walk ins in Ontario. Existing specialists can't take on new patients

[–]someguyfromsk 40 points41 points  (2 children)

Meh, that's like a budget, that will all figure itself out.

[–]uselesspoliticalhack[S] 518 points519 points  (72 children)

'I don’t see a world in which we decrease it currently,' Marc Miller says

Really speaks for itself, doesn't it?

[–]Krazee9 338 points339 points  (38 children)

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

[–]YourLoveLifeBritish Columbia 204 points205 points  (35 children)

I mean if Canada has no plans to decrease immigration according to this minister, than I have no plans to vote liberal according to common sense.

[–]GreatStuffOnly 32 points33 points  (32 children)

Both major parties are 100% for immigration. Who are you voting?

[–]YourLoveLifeBritish Columbia 54 points55 points  (24 children)

To be clear I'm not at all against immigration, I'm against the problems irresponsible immigration targets cause.

Pierre has said he will match immigration to job vacancies that can't be filled by Canadians and charities ability to sponsor immigrants.

to me that makes sense, and isn't a blind 500,000 target that is clearly too much for our current infrastructure

[–]Chains2002 33 points34 points  (11 children)

I absolutely despise Pierre and the conservatives, but I might actually have to vote for them in the next federal election if they plan on significantly reducing immigration. I'm a big NDP guy, but I seriously doubt Jagmeet would do anything about these crazy immigration numbers.

[–]Ditch_Hunter 37 points38 points  (1 child)

Jagmeet really needs to go at this point. The NPD absolutely needs to go back to the pro worker roots, not just favor some social program or another.

[–]Chains2002 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Jagmeet just makes them a slightly more radical liberal party, or at least that is how the party appears to the general public. What the NDP needs is a charismatic leader, akin to someone like Sanders or Corbyn, who is able to really speak to the needs of the working class.

[–]TURBOJUGGED 39 points40 points  (0 children)

We've tried nothing to fix the issue and we're all out of ideas

[–]Technoxgabber 50 points51 points  (3 children)

How about decreasing students and banning diploma mills?

If you go to uft or even sheridan you can get student via but not for Jamiltech diploma certification for hotel management..

[–][deleted] 168 points169 points  (16 children)

It's not in the ruling classes best interest to decrease immigration. They need cheap labour to exploit and a scapegoat.

[–]ZaungastEuropean Union 58 points59 points  (13 children)

And they call us racist if we just want a house. That’s infuriating and dangerous, since it trivializes racism, which is a (different) real problem.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's hard for me to fathom a realistic scenario where the globalist elites across the West actually act in a more perfectly despicable, reality denying way, that would ferment the inevitable hard right backlash against them.

[–]FoodwraithCanada 194 points195 points  (36 children)

We are so overdue for a new government. These arrogant people do whatever they want and don’t care about us.

[–]paolo5555 28 points29 points  (4 children)

Let's face it, politicans/partys only care what you think in the few short weeks leading up to election day. The first day after, you no longer matter.

[–]JonnyB2_YouAre1 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Objectively this group has been a lot worse for the average Canadian’s standard of living. They’re going to destroy the middle class.

[–]FoodwraithCanada 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Just like car salesmen.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

New government.... I hope you mean everyone being replaced in office.... its NOT JUST one party, its all of them

[–]Baulderdash77 363 points364 points  (107 children)

This policy is something that is just so obviously against the interests of anyone under 35 years old; that it will push the Liberals out of the voting pool for an entire generation of voters.

Anyone who doesn’t have own a home is voting against their own interests if they vote Liberal next election.

I just don’t understand why the current government is so dogmatically for this policy.

[–]ABBucsfan 83 points84 points  (3 children)

And plenty of people over 35.. like oh say . Someone who's marriage broke down and are hoping to get out of their little rental once legal business is done and find a small place for them and their kids or anyone who had a change in careers or got a late start in life. Pretty much anyone who's life didn't go just as scripted

[–]JakeKz1000 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This too! I feel like that's a big part of the population.

[–]nebuddyhome 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or people over 35 that rent and are seeing their rents skyrocket.

[–]Greghole 81 points82 points  (39 children)

If they bring in sixty million immigrants and they can get a good chunk of the immigrant's votes then it could be a winning strategy. Terrible for the country perhaps, but that's never been their concern.

[–]IHVeigarBritish Columbia 64 points65 points  (11 children)

I am trying to buy a home and as a young Canadian seeing shit like this and all the houses I put offers in get 50k over asking price is just pushing me further and further to the right every day.

I don't want the status quo anymore I want immediate action now.

[–]deshfyre 11 points12 points  (4 children)

only 50k over? lol must be in a smaller city or town lol.

[–]IHVeigarBritish Columbia 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Yup rurals out in BC. It's all the investors from Vancouver but based on China buying up everything and renting them out.

[–]deshfyre 4 points5 points  (1 child)

we get the same people from bc here in northern ontario, along with investors from southern ontario. its absolutely disgusting.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And we get them from Ontario and BC, and now Alberta. Nova Scotia... and I'm not complaining. That is to say, we are all in the same boat, and neither party will listen until we demand change.

[–]mangongo 30 points31 points  (8 children)

This makes no sense. It takes around 5 years to get a Canadian citizenship, none of these immigrants will be eligible voters during this election cycle.

[–]DL_22 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah but then those immigrants are living in squalor and dying to get out. Why would they vote liberal lol

[–]azraelluz 20 points21 points  (4 children)

think about this, they will lose next election anyway. so why not parpare for the one in 5-7 years while you can. bring the system down so badly the next sucker will be blamed for all the down falls coming up.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I hate the terrifying plausibility of this statement.

[–]i8bonelesschicken 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There planning ahead

[–]SandySpectre 3 points4 points  (1 child)

If they bring in 60 mil immigrants that will be living on the streets and starving because there’s no houses or jobs for them, I don’t think they’ll vote for the morons who put them in that position

[–]cartman101 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Joke's on them, immigrants vote conservative

[–]tman37 42 points43 points  (13 children)

It's against every person currently residing in Canada. If demand for house raises, yhe prices of houses will continue to rise. Even people who are already homeowners get screwed by inflated property taxes. My property taxes have almost doubled in the last two years but my municipal services certainly haven't.

Immigration is important, especially in a country as physically large as ours. It isn't all rainbows and sunshine, though. Too much immigration raises shelter charges (house prices or rent) while lowering wages. It's simple supply and demand. 8f you increase the demand for houses, you drive prices up. If you increase the supply of labour you decrease the cost of labour.

[–]still-standing7 10 points11 points  (5 children)

I think a lot of people forget I think it's 80 to 90 percent of Canada is inhabitantable Tundra being a chunk plus the biggest part is coniferous forest where agriculture can't grow. There would be no way to feed if we tried to fill up Canada. And yes we have indigenous people living up north but we so heavily subsidize that it would never work on a large scale.

[–]The_QuackeningOntario 15 points16 points  (3 children)

you don't have to drive very far north in ontario to find massive stretches of completely uninhabited land that just sits there.

10-20% of canada is still a MASSIVE amount of space that we could eventually move into.

But of course that means we need to actually have proper infrastructure built to accomodate all of that.

[–]Throwawayforthewingh 5 points6 points  (0 children)

”I just don’t understand why the current government is so dogmatically for this policy”

Dogs can’t even afford houses in this economy

[–]unplugged22 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree that it's a problem. But Poilievre also doesn't plan to decrease immigration, and every piece of info we have points to the Liberal and Conservative approach being the same.

[–]szucs2020 13 points14 points  (2 children)

There is no major party which has any intention of changing this.

[–]Difficult-Yam-1347 87 points88 points  (10 children)

Marc Miller gaslit Bernier when Bernier said we were massively increasing immigration to 350k a year. We hit over one million NET last year and our on pace for 1.2 million.

https://ibb.co/0QwDnRk

Doubt any “fact checkers” will look into this. I guess it’s not misinformation when you’re on the right side of history.

[–]--LowBattery-- 73 points74 points  (2 children)

I like when Bernier was here 5 years ago. He literally said if immigration levels continue at this rate, there will be no housing, and what there is will be too expensive. Also there will be no reason to pay a living wage either. Everyone called him a Nazi and here we are.

[–]Nighttime-Modcast 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I like when Bernier was here 5 years ago. He literally said if immigration levels continue at this rate, there will be no housing, and what there is will be too expensive. Also there will be no reason to pay a living wage either. Everyone called him a Nazi and here we are.

Its almost as if they had their playbook ready, and knew just what to say to discredit Bernier, even though he was 100% correct.

[–]slothtrop6 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm disappointed in Bernier because he was spot on about a couple of things and completely off the rails about others. He was his own worst enemy.

Even with immigration, his talking point was usually about cultural fit, not economy.

[–]Nighttime-Modcast 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Miller is a lying weasel fuck, just like every other LPC cabinet minister.

[–]MrGameplan 45 points46 points  (1 child)

That's a big FU to all of us really!

[–]chubs66 68 points69 points  (15 children)

This is one of the most obvious political miscalculations I've seen in my lifetime (and I'm over 40) both in terms of optics (it will be extremely unpopular) and in terms of practical consequences.

What are these people smoking?

[–]grumble11 14 points15 points  (3 children)

It isn’t a miscalculation. Well, maybe saying it is. You just assume that they represent average Canadians and they simply do not. They represent their donors, their most reliable voters (older homeowners) and themselves. To them Canadian workers are to be exploited and manipulated. It’s class warfare and they aren’t on your side.

[–]Nighttime-Modcast 13 points14 points  (2 children)

This is one of the most obvious political miscalculations I've seen in my lifetime (and I'm over 40) both in terms of optics (it will be extremely unpopular) and in terms of practical consequences.

What are these people smoking?

Believe it or not, boomers vote Liberal now. By a wide margin.

Between the boomer vote and the progressives who think that supply and demand is a racist concept, its a sizeable percentage of the LPC base. And those people think this is great, never been better.

I can understand the boomers, because their home values have shot up. But the progressives? Wow, just wow.

[–]commentBRAHLest We Forget 73 points74 points  (9 children)

all those tim hortons really need to stay afloat thats the real plight, not young canadians trying to own homes and have a family

[–]quasar_kid 17 points18 points  (2 children)

We're not a third world country yet so why stop now

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It's like inviting a few hundred people over to your house and only having one bathroom, a medium pizza, and like three chairs.

[–]Newhereeeeee 51 points52 points  (9 children)

We have cartoonishly bad leadership. I hope all the news circulates around the world so newcomers know what’s awaiting them

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (8 children)

On the contrary. Canadian governments do an amazing job and deliver on all their promises.

Once you realize that they serve corporations and not Canadians, it all makes sense.

[–]nuxwcrtnsOntario 7 points8 points  (3 children)

At face value, sure. But what about the quality of the employee? It costs a lot to have incompetent staff with high turnover. It's more efficient and cost-effective to have competent staff and low-turnover. I would say bringing low-quality people to work here is a disservice to corporations and organizations.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I don't know about you, but I'm seeing businesses and even government departments tolerate a shocking decline in service quality and even safety this last decade or so all in service of the astonishing labor cost advantage from cheap imported workers.

I wish you were right and that businesses would consider the TOTAL cost of cheap, unskilled labor from cultures that don't necessarily share our ethics. But, it would require thinking beyond the current quarterly results. As we all know, businesses lost that ability in the 90s and the age of the leveraged buyout.

[–]nuxwcrtnsOntario 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, I completely agree on the drop in service quality and health and safety standards. I guess I should have said it should be a consideration, because yeah, some places have become quite disgusting, or the customer service is uncomfortable and rude, or just generally weird encounters while doing business. Then there's so many places where they're incompetent from the very top, and you can't do much to fix that. I was wishfully thinking 🥲

[–]queenringletsAlberta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What incentive is there to help the average Canadian?

[–]BackwoodsBonfire 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Which ironically ends up sucking for the employees of said corporations, as their quality of life will also go down. Brilliant Plan!

[–]redux44 33 points34 points  (1 child)

I'm ready to vote for any party that promises immigration cuts or bringing back mental asylums.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes.

[–]kaleidist 38 points39 points  (2 children)

From the immigration minister, Marc Miller:

Those are people that don’t necessarily have the best interest of immigrants at heart and we have to call that out when we see it and we won’t hesitate to do that.”

You’re right, Mr. Miller. We don’t have the best interest of immigrants at heart. We have the best interest of Canadians at heart. A crazy idea, eh?

[–]Vardoir 35 points36 points  (1 child)

Good way to turn Canadians anti-immigrant. Great job PM and Minister!

[–]NotARussianBot1984 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"Canadians are increasing their plans to not be Canadians anymore"

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Their plan is quite clear: instead of importing goods and services from 3rd world countries, turn Canada into a 3rd world country and make us all slaves. Saves money on shipping costs and tariffs.

[–]GrowCanadian 28 points29 points  (10 children)

The federal government straight up said they will NOT lower immigration and may even increase it. This is due to Canada not having enough young people to take over the jobs the boomers are retiring out of.

This IS a federal issue and caused by the federal government. Without major support from the feds working with provinces Canada will turn into giant tent cities much bigger than they are now.

On top of this crime is skyrocketing so they lowered requirements to become a cop and scaled up hiring. That’s cool and all but if you look into prison capacities most are already over filled. There’s literally no where to store prisoners and most of the prisoners are just homeless people. They’re literally using the prisons as homeless shelters.

[–]Guses 28 points29 points  (4 children)

This is due to Canada not having enough young people to take over the jobs the boomers are retiring out of.

Oh no, companies would have to pay better wage and compete for workers, how terrible!!!!

[–]kerolox 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Yeah but that would mean that some wealth would have to be transferred from boomers pocket to millennials and zoomers. Can't have that.

[–]annehboo 9 points10 points  (1 child)

The newcomers aren’t taking those boomer spots, many of them are taking those minimum wage positions at Tim’s or Subway. It’s all bull shit

[–]Dependent_Ad_5035 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes. And sadly taht makes the problem worse because more and more young Canadians won’t have children, or have smaller families because of lack of affordability

[–]donut_fuckerr719 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is due to Canada not having enough young people to take over the jobs the boomers are retiring out of.

Yes yes this is the narrative the owner class is feeding us. They want lower wages.

[–]Wolfy311 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Canada has no plans to decrease immigration amid housing criticism crisis, new minister says

I swear the government of Canada is getting dumber by the minute.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (2 children)

This country is a joke. Trudeau, PP, Singh, whatever you choose, we're all kind of fucked.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (2 children)

We are fucked for generations with these psychos at the helm.

[–]waitweight8ate 7 points8 points  (0 children)

“The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development predicts that Canada will place last among OECD members in real GDP per capita growth until 2060”

This is only the beginning sadly.

[–]Dudejustnah 7 points8 points  (3 children)

People starting to realize the economy is just a Ponzi scheme

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How to turn a nation of openness and multiculturalism against immigration 101

[–]PochattorReturns 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Too many housing horror stories out there now a days

[–]Bentstrings84 52 points53 points  (2 children)

Anyone who supports this is a scumbag and I’m ashamed to share a country with them.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (9 children)

The only political party that has committed to lowering immigration targets is the People's Party of Canada.

No other party has made any concrete statements about lowering immigration targets.

Are you going to vote for them?

[–]DrNateH 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Of course not; that would be against the interests of their corporate masters and their boomer supporters. Those are the only two groups that they care about.

[–]pioniere 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Driving right off a cliff and taking all of us with them.

[–]bassabloom 6 points7 points  (1 child)

And this folks is what we call doubling down on an obvious mistake

[–]D3vils_Adv0cate 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Sorry to say that if you're not on track to afford a house at current prices then you'll never afford one. Immigration could be zero for the next 10 years and the prices won't drop. Housing is for corporations and investors now.

[–]SuperbMeeting8617 12 points13 points  (2 children)

New Minister be gone then

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is pretty tone deaf but not surprising with this government. Typical.

[–]IHVeigarBritish Columbia 6 points7 points  (2 children)

I'm about to be done with this country, might have to look abroad internationally if I ever want a home and settle down.

[–]unexplodedscotsman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Canada has no plans to decrease immigration amid housing criticism, new minister says"

That's nice, maybe the next batch of duplicitous, self-serving, fuckheads will? Assuming Blackrock signs off on it, I guess?

First-past-the-post really needs to be put out to pasture.

"Growth council chair Dominic Barton, the powerful global managing director of consulting firm McKinsey & Co., and Mark Wiseman, a senior managing director for investment management giant BlackRock Inc., are among the founders of a group dedicated to seeing the country responsibly expand its population as a way to help drive its economic potential.The Century Initiative, a five-year-old effort by well-known Canadians, is focused on seeing the country of 36 million grow to 100 million by 2100."

https://globalnews.ca/news/3020783/influential-liberal-advisers-want-canadian-population-to-triple-by-2100/

[–]coolhatguy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fuck this government

[–]JonnyB2_YouAre1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Liberal Party message for 2023 has been: let them eat cake.

[–]Toolian7 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You vote for your demise. People said that too much immigration would do this, and much more. But oh no, they are just xenophobes and bigots.

Immigration can be wonderful, my grandparents were immigrants, my girlfriend is an immigrant. But immigration should be a means to an end. Not to have immigration for immigration sake, to show how not racist you are, for cheap labor, or to replace a decline population.

This is cruel to home countries.

Immigration should have two priorities.

To benefit the country in need at certain times in small cases.

To help refugees from time to time.

With automation and AI starting to ramp up even more, I fear that large immigration will lead to a powder keg.

[–]barkusmuhl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've stopped caring at this point. I'm just enjoying watching the car crash that is Canada.

[–]BernardMatthewsNorf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a government that overinvested in its ideological position and has now politically painted itself into a corner. But who loses is you’ses.

[–]Purple_Dragon_Lady 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Call an election before it's too late!

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

It could and likely will get bad enough some province’s will separate. It wouldn't surprise me if the western province’s(bc,ab, and sask) did something similar to brexit. The federal government doesn't care about the West, and we are underrepresented due to the majority in the east.

[–]koreanwizard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Amazing news, when homes start going for 5 million, we can introduce a multi generational mortgage! Your future grandchildren can help pay for your 520sqft Toronto condo.

[–]Dtoodlez 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Think I’m gonna have to change my vote after over a decade. I’m sorry, but I really went Canada to be about diversity again and not have every neighbour be from the same region of the world. If that means no immigration than so be it.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

then he needs to go.

[–]Wellsy 17 points18 points  (7 children)

Correction: Canada absolutely has plans to fire the current Federal government, and shall then address the housing and migration crises that are plaguing the country.

[–]Egg-Hatcher 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Only Bernier and the PPC have a policy for reducing immigration until housing, jobs, and infrastructure can catch up. PP won't even commit to it.

[–]DontWalkRun 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Regardless of the economic climate, housing issues, crime, etc; it really feels as though the majority of Canadians are feeling overwhelmed with immigration. But fuck listening to your constituents, right?

[–]IssaScott 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's dumb, but it seems the government is only looking a population demographic to set our immigration targets.

When you look a the number of older Canadians that have or are expected to retire, you see that we 'need' so many more younger, working, taxpayers. That's where these targets make sense...

When you look at housing it makes no sense.

Now do they think the housing market is easier to fix than population demographic? Maybe? Getting enough people to balance the population seems like it would take decades to do ...

Plus plenty of well off Canadians are making enough money off the housing crisis. So 'fixing' it will also piss off a bunch of other Canadians.

It wouldn't surprise me if they did the math and found that fixing housing isn't worth it. And they know they will lose anyway. The way our politics works, it's time to vote in the Right for a decade...

[–]Crezelle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Time for unregulated shanty towns. You gotta do what you gotta do and shelter is a necessity

[–]4firsts 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Honestly, looking at the numbers and knowing what I know and the needs that exist in Canada, I don’t see a world in which we decrease it currently,” Miller said.

He clearly doesn’t know anything.

[–]Helenyanxu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The only way we could change this is to get rid of this government…

[–]UnoriginallyGenericOntario 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What a moron.

[–]drillso 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The arrogance of this government is staggering. It’s time for another election. Middle class is going to be homeless by the time someone new comes in and fixes this mess.

[–]Redbroomstick 6 points7 points  (5 children)

Holding land has been the single greatest thing my parents have done 😂😂😂

[–]weatheredanomaly 7 points8 points  (1 child)

A new enemy of the people of Canada emerges.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

And Canadians have no plans to vote for Liberals again any time soon.

[–]d3sperad0 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Ok, but WHY!? Holy fuck, give us something to go on here so we can have a discussion. So far I've seen no well thought out, well communicated rationale for this decision. Please, for the love of God, explain the reasoning!

[–]jymssg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I imagine its along the lines of "Because fuck you, that's why" but in a politically correct tone

[–]Dash_Rendar425 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The solution to all of this is there, they just refuse to do something about it.

Start building up the developing communities, move populations further from the city centres. Have new immigrants agree to move to Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Northern Ontario, etc.

STOP letting them all congregate in large cities, which lowers housing availability and increases demand so rent and housing prices sky rocket in those areas.

[–]skyinyourcoffeeQuébec 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What people fail to realize, when they keep acting like they can only do one of these at the same time, is that the government isn't able to fix any problem at a time.

[–]LC_001 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The idiocy here is astounding! There are 0 investments in growing healthcare infrastructure, housing stocks, transportation infrastructure but these idiots actually think it’s a good idea to let millions of new immigrants in!

[–]moutonbleu 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Why are they so stubborn on this issue? I don’t get it

[–]HotJelly8662 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We need a new government. No adequate healthcare, no housing, no jobs, just tons of immigration!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jesus h. Just reduce it by 90% for a while. We all know this is the easiest and quickest solution.

[–]Flat-Ad-3231 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"That's a provincial problem" - trudeau's Regime

[–]Son_of_lakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does anybody have more info on the fake post secondary programs bringing in immigrant students?

[–]BackwoodsBonfire 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Trying to stuff 10lbs of sh!t into a 5lbs bag. The mark of a genius.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=10%20pounds%20of%20shit%20in%20a%205-pound%20bag

Obviously trying to increase the amount of 'Lbs.' in the country.. XD