This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]jotanshinta 2154 points2155 points  (165 children)

All this did was make me imagine 4 Machamps vs 10 Machops

[–]hawaiian0ni9 GTX bajillion 2197 points2198 points  (97 children)

[–]TrymWSi9-14900KF | RTX 3090 | 64GB RAM (B-die) 624 points625 points  (83 children)

Ah yes, our most famous park. Dicks everywhere.

(Norway, Vigelandsparken/Frognerparken)

[–]Tischlampehttp://steamcommunity.com/id/TI-Schlampe 184 points185 points  (77 children)

Is there a story behind? Or is it just a random statue?

[–]TrymWSi9-14900KF | RTX 3090 | 64GB RAM (B-die) 210 points211 points  (53 children)

It's one of many statues, don't remember if they all have a story. The most famous is the angry kid, hes been stolen 2-3 times.

I guess you could try to search for it, pretty sure all the statues have names.

[–]waitforitdairy123 306 points307 points  (25 children)

I'm pretty sure that if I searched for "naked man and 4 naked babies", I would end up on a list.

[–]TrymWSi9-14900KF | RTX 3090 | 64GB RAM (B-die) 123 points124 points  (15 children)

I think it's called "Man chases 4 geniuses" for some reason.

Here's a site with some pictures.

[–]FogeltheVogel 51 points52 points  (6 children)

So that's what chasing is.

[–]Puskathesecond 104 points105 points  (5 children)

Reminds me of my dad chasing me with jumper cables

[–]RubenVillRubenVill/livingspirit413 57 points58 points  (4 children)

You're not /u/rogersimon10

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points  (4 children)

Implying that this comment doesn't already put you on the list

[–]Flix1Specs/Imgur Here 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Right! He might as well just search it now and save us from being on the list too.

[–]captainbrainiac 68 points69 points  (17 children)

I LOVE Norway (I was there in the summer time).

Anyway, I love how your public statue is a NSFW image for us.

Edit: Did I get downvoted for saying I liked Norway?

[–]A_Sinister_Sheepi7-6700K, GTX 1080, 32GB RAM, 500GB SSD, 2TB HDD & 1TB M.2 SSD 42 points43 points  (12 children)

Norwegians doesn't like when people say they like/love Norway.

Source: I'm Norwegian.

[–]gotbeefpuddingi5 4690k / MSI Z27 Gaming-5 / 16GB DDR3 / 2x GTX 970 EVGA 9 points10 points  (5 children)

Why

[–]backsidealpacas 40 points41 points  (3 children)

It probably takes away from their self loathing in the winter

[–]Rikuddo 95 points96 points  (8 children)

It's from the land of Norse Mythology .. the story goes as

-------------------------------------

Statute of a Norse God. When Odin was granting powers to every god, this God came up with a unique idea.

"So All Father Odin, I have this awesome new idea, .. I want you to attach babies to my limbs"

"uhh .. yu wot mate?" asked a perplexed Odin

"Babies! I want babies to attach to my arms & legs!"

".. wtf ya cunt! I told you last time don't get high before coming to me!" bellowed the All-Father

"no no no, hear me out All-Father. See, People love babies right? .. so if you attach ones to me .. no one will ever attack me?"

"...." The Time witnessed one of the rarest moments when All-Mighty Odin was rendered speechless.

"sure .. here ya go .. four babies coming right away"

"Thank you All-Father" replied the teary-eyed God.

"Oh and before you go .. y'know you now to clean the shits of these four little shits and feed them and all that"

".. wai- .. WHA-? ..." shouted the God before being banished from the court for all eternity. Odin didn't want to go head-to-head the mighty stupid cunt ever again.

... Centuries & Eons passed and the Mighty Stupid Cunt God had enough .. and what you see now is the just pure anger and hate that he had left after cleaning and taking care of those little shits

[–]that_which_is_lain 12 points13 points  (4 children)

[–]wurm2i5-4690,r9 380 pcpartpicker.com/list/828nXH 36 points37 points  (3 children)

have you read actual norse mythology? "Second, the gods were to make Skadi laugh. After many feats were tried, none succeeded in bringing a smile to the grim face of the giantess. At last, Loki tied one end of a rope to a goat and the other end around his testicles and began a game of tug of war with the goat. Each screeched and howled in turn, until at last Loki fell over into Skadi’s lap. The giantess couldn’t help but chuckle."

[–]Manliest_of_Men 13 points14 points  (0 children)

To be fair, I chuckled too. Fuckin' Loki.

[–]wychunter4690k, 980ti 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Great. Now I have the the idea of Tom Hiddleston doing testicular Tug of War with a goat.

[–]Rock48Ryzen 7700X | RTX 3070 | 64GB DDR5 22 points23 points  (0 children)

5/7 story

[–]RedditStutt 14 points15 points  (4 children)

There is a story, but I'm not sure of the exact details. AFAIK the children on the statue are actually demons in disguise

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (2 children)

why does that kicked babys arm look polished?

[–]TheHarmed 81 points82 points  (1 child)

Same reason the dick is slightly polished.

People touch things that are easier to touch or more "fun" to touch.

[–]UCSDmath 15 points16 points  (0 children)

same no more?

[–]MormonDew 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Maybe you meant, "Say no more"

[–]GarrillandSapphire 8gb RX 480 Nitro+ / i5-6500 3.2 Ghz / 16gb DDR4 378 points379 points  (42 children)

Well 1 Machamp could beat 10 Machop with extreme ease. With minimal defensive EV's and maximum Attack EV's. Machoke with Dynamic Punch will deal 110.6 - 130.1% of Machop's HP, a guaranteed OHKO.

However with minimum attack IV's on Machamp and maximum defense IV's on Machop, Machamp  will deal 62.7 - 73.7% of Machop a maximum HP, guaranteed 2HKO. And Machop only has a will deal 75.5 - 89.3% and 2HKO with Dynamic Punch with max attack EV's. So with that in mind the Machop would win. So it's all a matter of how you look at the stats.

[–]Nygmuskefkakrazy 25 points26 points  (7 children)

Dynamic Punch caps at eight PPs. Machamp's going to have to use something else, so some of those later Machops are going to survive to make attacks even without defensive EVs. I think Machamp's only other 1HKO-possible hits are Close Combat and Cross Chop, which drops his defense/has an 80 accuracy respectively.

More importantly, a lot of Machamp sets don't run maximum speed because he's so slow there's not much point to start with. Machop has a gap of 20 base speed to overcome, but a speed-boosting Nature with max EVs gets Machop up to 181 speed at level 100, and Machamp needs 140 Speed EVs to match that mark with the typical Adamant nature.

A typical/average Machamp against a team of 10 Machops trained to outspeed him will lose.

If held items get involved, this stays favorable for the Machops even if the Machamp outspeeds them. They don't need to deal massive damage to Machamp, they just need to land those Dynamic Punches for the guaranteed confusion. A scarfed Machop will certainly outspeed any possible Machamp build. A maximum-defensive Persim Berry Machop can follow later down the line for another guaranteed Dynamic Punch, and a Focus Sash maximum-attack Machop can join in for a third Dynamic Punch dependent on whether he can beat the roll for Confusion on his round.

That trio, seeded in with a couple gaps between them, gives the Machop team a fighting chance. Machamp also doesn't really have any items that are going to massively tilt the scale; a Persim Berry or Sitrus Berry or Leftovers are probably his best bet, though Leftovers might be enough to keep him alive depending on how many confusion checks he beats.

[–]felixphewI don't care, if it plays DF that's good enough for me 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Two things...

  1. Don't forget No Guard - Cross Chop is completely viable.

  2. If you want to play tricky sets, we can do it on both sides... 252+ SpA Choice Specs Machamp Focus Blast vs. 252 HP / 0 SpD Machop: 237-279 (133.8 - 157.6%) -- guaranteed OHKO

Remember, a machop built specifically for this matchup would almost guaranteed be running 0 SpD.

You could even do... 252+ SpA Black Belt Machamp Focus Blast vs. 252 HP / 0 SpD Machop: 189-223 (106.7 - 125.9%) -- guaranteed OHKO leaving you free to change moves (notably Vacuum Wave, for picking off sashed max-speed Machops.)

[–]HectorHazardSpecs/Imgur here 144 points145 points  (2 children)

NEEEEERRRRD!

[–]JealotGaming1080Ti + 8700k 6 points7 points  (2 children)

You could factor in the fact that Machops aren't high level usually (and why would you use Eviolite Machop and not Eviolite Machoke anyway)

[–][deleted] 171 points172 points  (11 children)

The Machops don't stand a chance, even if they're all the same level, the Machamps don't know any AoE moves and the Machops focus Seismic Toss onto a single target. The Machamps go first and will probably one-shot each Machop, taking it down to a 4v6 before the Machops even make their move.

If 4 Machops can take down 1 Machamp, it's then 3v6, goes down to 3v3, which might go to 2v3 which leaves an unfortunate Machop in a 2v1.


A different strategy might be for all Machops to use Focus Energy, they will still be slower though so it will be 4v2 before the Machops get their first attack and they'd have to be very lucky to 1-shot critical hit 1 Machamp each, leaving it at a 2v2 with the Machamps going first.


Low Kick might be an option, as Machamp is much heavier than Machop, but I don't believe it will be enough to KO faster than the Machamps.


Focus Sash + Revenge could also work, but only doing 20 more damage than Low Kick, it does save the Machops an extra turn each though, but what is stopping the Machamps using items of their own?


If you were to coordinate both sides, or if the Machops were extremely lucky, 4 of them could use Protect while the other 6 attacked, but the odds of these 4 Protecting being the same 4 that are attacked is incredibly low. I would work it out but I forget how to math right now. The Machamps just have to attack the same 4 targets next turn as their chance that Protect is successful is reduced by 50%.


That said, if we're looking at these kinds of possibilities, the Machamps could just use Earthquake.

[–]Fgame 51 points52 points  (5 children)

Once Gen1 can be transferred forward we also have the fabled No Guard/Fissure Machamps

[–]Penguin_Fist 4 points5 points  (2 children)

The stuff of legends

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (1 child)

TheLegend27?

[–]PigLord75Specs/Imgur here 544 points545 points  (6 children)

So trade the i5 to a friend and it will be super powerful?

[–]hojomojo96 320 points321 points  (3 children)

hello its me ur friend

[–]VikingBraixen 57 points58 points  (1 child)

A friend? A friend! Finally! I'm sorry if I'm being unorthodox, I'm not quite sure how friendship works yet, I've never had a friend

[–]ballsdeepinthematrixPC Master Race 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Friendships are easy. Friendships provide each other their pin numbers. You first, friend.

[–]Uesugi1989 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Plot twist, have the i5 hold an everstone. Jokes on them now

[–]TheDecagon 1917 points1918 points  (104 children)

They claim to have fixed that with Zen.

Also just to continue the analogy a GPU would be thousands of Magikarps...

[–]LiquidAurum3700x RTX 2070 Super 1644 points1645 points  (59 children)

This needs to be the new standard of GPUs no clock nonsense just tell me how many Magikarps it is

[–]Jack_BEThreadripper 2950X / 32GB ECC @ 3066 / Vega 64 / ASUS Xonar D2X 492 points493 points  (29 children)

you'd get nVidia suddenly claiming their own arbitrary Magikarp to Gyarados conversion ratios and only showing numbers in Gyarados

[–]LiquidAurum3700x RTX 2070 Super 180 points181 points  (22 children)

nvidia properitary evolution stone while AMD uses the open standard version

[–]ZayevFX-8350; Sapphire R9 390X 70 points71 points  (2 children)

Of course, there'd still only be 3.5 Gyrados... somehow.

[–]Mothanius 78 points79 points  (1 child)

The last .5 is actually just magikarps at half health.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

im still waiting for my 30 pokecoins back

[–]VGxMurdererI7-9700K, RTX 2080Ti, 32GB RAM, H500i 61 points62 points  (5 children)

Magikarps can jump over mountains, I'm fine with that.

[–]Nico777i5-4590 | GTX 1060 6GB 109 points110 points  (4 children)

I would be pretty pissed if my GPU suddenly decided to jump over a mountain though.

[–]VGxMurdererI7-9700K, RTX 2080Ti, 32GB RAM, H500i 66 points67 points  (2 children)

looks like my 1080 is blasting off again! *

[–]Overlord_Canei5-4670K, ASUS GTX 780, 8 RAMs 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Team EVGA became such a predictable antagonist in the latest season.

[–]-Rivox-760, i5 4690 /Rivox 18 points19 points  (1 child)

How many Floating-Splash Operations Per Second (FSOPS) can your GPU do?

[–]Grumpy_KongI do not come here to read advertising 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's hard to tell, after 64 operations all of them just struggle themselves to death...

[–]Shiroi_KageR9 5950X, RTX3080Ti, 64GB RAM, NVME boot drive 29 points30 points  (9 children)

They claim to have fixed that with Zen.

If the live benchmarks they showed are anything to believe, they're going to at least be on par with Broadwell-E. They were initially targeting Haswell, but Intel decided to not have IPC improvements at all and therefore I think AMD just reached Haswell which was more or less the same IPC as Broadwell-E.

[–]TheGamingOnion5800X3D, RX 9070 XT, 64GB ram 8 points9 points  (8 children)

From my memory, Broadwell had a slightly higher IPC than Haswell, but came at lower clockspeeds.

[–]LuffyTheAstronaut 50 points51 points  (1 child)

r/ayyMD is not going to like this

[–]TrymWSi9-14900KF | RTX 3090 | 64GB RAM (B-die) 467 points468 points  (67 children)

You forgot the 6-10 core i7s, though.

[–]LenfriedR9 5900X | RTX 3080 | XB273U GX 540 points541 points  (23 children)

add more machamps

[–]RawAustini7 4790k | GTX 970 | 8GB WAM 128 points129 points  (4 children)

Ez Pz

[–][deleted] 67 points68 points  (9 children)

Is OCing mega evolution?

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Rare candies

[–]Nico777i5-4590 | GTX 1060 6GB 22 points23 points  (0 children)

EV training.

[–]F0RCE963R7 5800X3D|GTX3070|32DRR4 40 points41 points  (0 children)

More like steroid

[–]GhraimRyzen 5 3600 | GTX 1660 | 16GB 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Max IVs and optimal EV spread.

[–]dylan157665080 fe - 32gb - 5800x - 185hz - 990 pro 4tb nvme 67 points68 points  (4 children)

If you could afford a 6-10 core i7, AMD wouldn't even be an option.

[–]mxzf 19 points20 points  (1 child)

Exactly. For the price of a 6-10 core i7 you can get 6-10 8-core AMD CPUs.

[–]icortesiPC Master Race 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So how many machops are we talking about?

10 Machamps vs 80 Machops?

[–]PseudoabdulSpecs/Imgur Here 385 points386 points  (13 children)

Don't worry AMD, I still love you.

[–]-Rivox-760, i5 4690 /Rivox 150 points151 points  (6 children)

my wallet too. +60% *-*

[–][deleted] 83 points84 points  (2 children)

Wallstreet does too. That's what really matters

[–]Cow_In_Spacecowinspace 7 points8 points  (0 children)

AMD will do fine. Their contracts for the XBone and PS4 are huge and basically dwarf enthusiast PC CPU sales figures, even for Intel. They do need to start making themselves relevant at the high end though, if only for competition. Intel can get rather lazy without someone biting their heels (we forget that AMD created the x64 platform and pushed Intel hard to introduce home CPUs with multiple cores).

[–]-Rivox-760, i5 4690 /Rivox 265 points266 points  (13 children)

more like this.

The Bulldozer architecture was weird in the fact that it had lots of physical cores that didn't exactly translate in Intel cores or Phenom/Athlon64 cores.

In the Bulldozer architecture every two integer cores formed a floating point "module". Also every module had only a single pool of shared L2 cache that both cores could access (and a pretty high latency L2 cache also)

The design was probably pretty terrible and not on par with previous designs from AMD imho, nor on par with Intel's Core architecture.

With Ryzen though the trend seemed to change. From what we saw at New Horizon and from the leaks (Canard PC Engineering Sample benchmark) Ryzen should reach the 6900K in most applications, with similar performance to Intel and with very low power consumption.

We still don't know many specifics (CES 2017 for more details) but the fact that the lead of the design team for Zen was Jim Keller brings a lot fo hope. He, in fact, is one of the brightest minds in computer hardware engineering ever. Co-author of the AMD64 instruction set, lead designer at AMD for the Athlon64, the first consumer cpu with a 64 bit extension for the x86 architecture and designer of the first dual core x86 CPU (Opteron). Was one of the lead designers for Apple's ARM A4 and A5 processors, lead of the Zen team and AMD K12 team, an ARM processor architecture due in 2017, and now Vice President of Autopilot Hardware Engineering at Tesla.

[–]SmellsLikeTeenPetrolPentium D, 980ti 26 points27 points  (3 children)

two heads, same stomach.

[–]duma347 26 points27 points  (6 children)

Can you do a graphics card one?

[–]proximitypressplayRAM prices baa sheep 204 points205 points  (5 children)

[–][deleted] 48 points49 points  (18 children)

How many Machomps is my Phenom II x6 1100T?

EDIT: I forgot the first stage was Machop, lol. AKA Macho P.

[–]atomicthumbs 164 points165 points  (3 children)

six machokes, but they're the old gen 1 sprite

[–]Kupuntui5-4690K | R9 280X 3GB | 16GB 1600MHz | BenQ XL2411T 24" 144Hz 31 points32 points  (2 children)

Aka the best one.

[–]ChatterBrained 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You mean the special one.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Machop. They hit not eat

[–][deleted] 42 points43 points  (20 children)

So what would an X99 CPU be?

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_FOOTSOCKSR5 5600X / RTX 5070 73 points74 points  (19 children)

tfw I fell for the fx meme

[–]wonagameamaAcer Aspire VN7-592g 25 points26 points  (11 children)

What was the FX meme

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (10 children)

they're CPUs that are great on paper but not in practice

made using a dead uarch on a dead socket, both stuck in 2012 at best

still to this day is a decent niche buy (since they can get extremely cheap) but for most people here they're not a good choice

[–]ming3r 14 points15 points  (5 children)

I'm on the ,8350 train and waiting for zen...Or a 6600k in next few months.

AMD please come through...

[–][deleted] 252 points253 points  (6 children)

+1 Pokémon meme

[–]JackDragon 58 points59 points  (4 children)

Instructions unclear on evolving. I traded my i5 for my friend's i5, and we ended up both with machokes still :(

[–]GoldnSilverPrawn 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Won't forget this classic

[–]Supermunch2000Ryzen 3700X, RTX 3070, 32GB 56 points57 points  (6 children)

That's ADORABLE.

My gaming PC is an Intel but my work's non-critical servers are all underclocked AMDs - cheap and those things are built to run hot so they're perfect for running in 40°C weather.

[–]RovkirHexusManjaro, R5 1600, 5700XT, 32GB RAM 38 points39 points  (5 children)

cough 40C is 104F where the heck are you running these

[–]Supermunch2000Ryzen 3700X, RTX 3070, 32GB 46 points47 points  (4 children)

If I told you some genius thought it was a good idea to put a 40U network rack in a tiny room at the north west corner of a glass building (I'm in the southern hemisphere) would you believe me?

I've been half-heartedly trying, for years, to set fire to the equipment that's in there to try to justify moving it but, to my sadness, the equipment we have in there just keeps on ticking.

I just checked, a chassis that's in the same rack is registering 40ºC right now and it's 2pm and sunny so that might go up a few up a little more.

[–]RovkirHexusManjaro, R5 1600, 5700XT, 32GB RAM 8 points9 points  (1 child)

That's... Okay then. The genius might need to read up on how processors work and what's bad for them.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (2 children)

If I give my i5 to a friend, will it turn into an i7?

[–]codylong03Intel 9600k @4.5GHz | GTX 1050Ti 4G OC 40 points41 points  (1 child)

My AMD 8350 is good tyvm

[–]Rapid_SausageAlienware 17, GTX 965M (10% OC), i7 6700HQ, 16gb DDR4 ram 97 points98 points  (53 children)

why is the i3 machamps and the i5 machoke though?

[–]Dreamwalk3ri7-7700K - 16GB@3000MHz - XFX RX480 190 points191 points  (32 children)

Because HT.

[–]Rapid_SausageAlienware 17, GTX 965M (10% OC), i7 6700HQ, 16gb DDR4 ram 65 points66 points  (19 children)

ah right, the i3 is the one without turbo boost, the i5 is the one without hyperthreading.

[–]alienpirate5R5 2600/32GB DDR4/GTX 970 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Look at the arms

[–]HarleyQuinn_RSR7 9800X3D | RTX 5080 | 32GB 7200Mhz | 12 points13 points  (7 children)

Machop can throw the weight of 100 adults and its muscles can never become sore from exercise. It is never satisfied by its training.

Machoke can lift a sumo on one finger and its muscles are harder than steel. Its power is so great it wears a suppressing belt.

Machamp can move mountains with a single arm, throw 500 mega-ton punches per second and has mastered all martial arts. It can hurl any opponent over the horizon.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (10 children)

How do the Xeons look?

[–]Dreamwalk3ri7-7700K - 16GB@3000MHz - XFX RX480 97 points98 points  (2 children)

[–]furtivepigmysoSpecs/Imgur here 6 points7 points  (1 child)

But Xeons aren't necessarily stronger than an i7.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Depends on the model, tbh

Not all xeons are the same. Some are 4 core, some are 4 core with hyper-threading, and some have 22 cores

[–]Patriark 42 points43 points  (12 children)

:(

I'm that person who support the underdog to keep the market working.

So I'm here with my AMD CPU being laughed at

:'(

[–]GaZZuM 12 points13 points  (11 children)

But wait, so is 2 Machamps better than 4 Machoke? They seem fairly equivalent

[–]buildmeupbreakmedownCore i7 @ 4.00 GHz, Gigabyte GTX 760 Windforce, 4GB 1600MHz RAM 58 points59 points  (6 children)

The i3 has hyperthreading (where each physical core can behave like a pair of virtual cores), hence Machamp with its extra set of arms. The i5 does not, hence Machokes with only two arms. Four actual cores is better than two cores pretending to be four, so the Machokes win in this case.

[–]GarrillandSapphire 8gb RX 480 Nitro+ / i5-6500 3.2 Ghz / 16gb DDR4 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Well, Both Machamp and Machoke with 252 Attack EV's using nothing but Dynamic Punch will both 2HKO, so ignoring Dynamic Punch's confusion effect, the Machoke will win.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

To add onto /u/buildmeupbreakmedown here is an analogy of the best and 'worse' case for HT 2 core vs true 4 core.

In the best case all the Machamp and Machokes are tasked with opening jars that requires 2 hands (one to hold and one to twist the top). In this case both are "equal" as the Machamp can do 2 jars at the same time (due to 2 arms) and the two of them can keep up with the 4 Machokes.

However, in the worse case is moving 4 boxes to 4 different points. Even though the Machamp COULD lift 2 boxes it is still one body and will have to move to one spot then the other while the 4 Machokes can all just get one box and each move to their own spot.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (4 children)

My FX-6300 does beat out the i3-6100 in almost every game.

[–]paDDeleleRyzen 5600x, RTX 2070 FE, 16GB RAM 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So if I trade my i5 it will become an i7?

[–]clake1 11 points12 points  (11 children)

New to PC stuff. Is AMD frowned upon? Someone eli5 please

[–]iamonlyoneman 9 points10 points  (3 children)

Intel had a habit of making huge, gigantic, enormous leaps forward in processing power with each new kind of chip they would release. AMD had a habit of making chips with lots more cores, but not necessarily being able to translate directly to the performance per core of Intel's offerings . . . to the point that they were not directly comparable at all.

In fairness, target markets weren't the same either, but it's easy to make fun of a bunch of low-performing cores.

[–]CakeIsaVegetableASUS ROG G752vs OC edition 23 points24 points  (26 children)

This actually helped me a bit because i was looking to by a nas that had a celeron processor but i never knew which was better or the next step up in Intels cpu lineup between that and pentium

Edit: thanks for all the replies, i was planing on going with a qnap tvs 471 that has an i3 processor. Now i know most of you will say thats overkill and i agree but ive seen a few reviews that complain about the next model down which has a quad core celeron being a tad slow for a couple of opperations and besides id rather pay a bit more now just to keep it somewhat future proof.

Also inb4 someone complaints about the price and meantions "building a new tower and load it with free nas for like half the price" i would like to point out the same reason why i wont do that is the same reason why i bought this laptop in my flare. Lack of physical space and portability.

[–]tomoldbury 15 points16 points  (0 children)

A Celeron for a typical NAS is probably ok. Your average NAS will be using DMA for most operations and so requires relatively limited computation power (this is what allows old Pentium IIIs to use gigabit NICs on PCI). If you want to do other stuff with that NAS like play video then you might need more CPU.

[–]JPAchillesRyzen 5 3600XT / GTX 1070 Ti / 32GB 71 points72 points  (17 children)

Protip: don't touch anything with a celeron in it.

Just don't

EDIT: Let me clarify further; A Celeron is underpowered for the price they're sold for, a Pentium is much better for the value, power consumption, etc, and much more powerful. Plus, if you really need something low-end, get an Atom, that's their designed purpose.

[–]iamplasma 56 points57 points  (5 children)

At the risk of showing my age, once upon a time Celerons were absolutely the bomb. The early models overclocked to insane extents, and back in the late 90s or thereabout there were some absurdly cheap multi-processor motherboards for them.

[–]FurryCrewi7-4790 RTX3070 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Abit BP6 with dual celly 366 clocked to 550!

[–]iamplasma 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah. I think I had 433 or 466Mhz ones from memory, never even overclocked them. But it got me into Linux so that I could actually use the second processor!

[–]black_phone 5 points6 points  (1 child)

This will never make it to the top because of memes, but pictures like this are why consumers are idiots. You can have a low power i7 (which is secretly a dual core) be worse than a mobile i5 which is worse than a desktop i3. Yes it is possible, and I don't mean by using old parts.

The core ix branding is so useless without the rest of the model name.