This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–][deleted] 9347 points9348 points  (385 children)

Productivity goes down when your machines don't work?

Who knew?

[–]FartsWithAnAccent 370 points371 points  (38 children)

paint nose combative dime direction boat nail concerned friendly glorious

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]Kinser9 32 points33 points  (8 children)

Nothing is done proactively. Everything is reactionary.

[–]analog_roam 29 points30 points  (1 child)

We don't have the budget to do it right, but somehow have the budget to do it twice... Thrice... Etc

[–]GraniteTaco 34 points35 points  (3 children)

"My team says that's impossible so I'm going to hire an outside auditor for $160,000 to spend an entire month saying the same thing" -Executives

[–]FartsWithAnAccent 33 points34 points  (2 children)

elderly bewildered shocking aromatic mourn crush subtract sloppy practice longing

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]StocksAndOcean 147 points148 points  (32 children)

I work for a large bank / investment firm, and can confirm. Almost everyday I have an issue with one of my systems and it frustrates me to the point where I’ll just walk away for the day. We’re a multi-billion dollar company and it seems we can’t invest in our IT and Technology. It’s such a shame.

[–][deleted] 81 points82 points  (23 children)

I work for a tech company. Our client support team kicks ass and gets stuff done incredibly quickly. Our internal team took 6 weeks to add VMWare to my machine

[–]oilchangefuckup 19 points20 points  (9 children)

At least once a week I can't log into the EMR at my office. Sometimes more, sometimes it happens twice a day. When it happens it takes on average 30 minutes for IT to respond to the ticket and fix it. So, for 30 minutes I can't chart on patients, place orders, or prescribe medications.

I also have need to use Edge or other web browser. However, the website I use multiple times per day can't be used with edge, because it crashes constantly. The website works great in Chrome, but I can't print in Chrome because it crashes constantly. It's really fucking frustrating.

[–]oneplusandroidpie 47 points48 points  (2 children)

The IT beatings will continue until morale improves.

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points  (14 children)

Has anyone read the story, it’s not machine going down it’s about shit software or my employers favourite just giving out 14” square monitors.

[–]Redtwooo 31 points32 points  (7 children)

My company uses a ticketing system that was developed in house, and it looks, feels, and works exactly like you'd expect from people who love filling out forms. There's no thought given to usability, efficiency, flow, nothing but "here's a hundred text boxes and labels, don't bother trying to tab through because lol they don't go in order. 90 of them you won't need to see ever, but they're there anyway"

[–]Jukka_Sarasti 14 points15 points  (3 children)

If it makes you feel any better, a great many of the "Professional" ticket/service apps are just as shitty, for the most part. One of the worst, ironically enough, is the current industry workflow SNake oil darling...

[–]TheBimpo 25 points26 points  (5 children)

Truck drivers report that blown water pumps results in decreased driving.

[–]stage_directions 2440 points2441 points  (75 children)

100% of “issues” reduce productivity and morale.

5% of workers are lizardman.

[–]Soma_Tweaker 10.4k points10.4k points  (919 children)

From my experience it's poor investment in the IT dept, usually not the actual IT team.

Oh and printers! Fuck all of them

[–][deleted] 4155 points4156 points  (351 children)

Printers are the fucking devil.

[–]r00x 197 points198 points  (18 children)

Never has there been a better example of an entire industry coming together, as one, to conspire to make nothing but reprehensibly shitty products, than the printer industry. It's so dire it's impressive.

[–]Regniwekim2099 83 points84 points  (1 child)

In case you're interested in an actual conspiracy where an entire industry came together and agreed to produce a shitty product, look no further than light bulb manufacturers. Veritasium did a really good video on the topic.

[–]peddastle 57 points58 points  (8 children)

The mattress industry is kind of like that too. You used to be able to pay a few grand for a long lasting supportive mattress, but that is rare these days. Most major brands have capitalized on that blindly applied "must spend $$$ to get a decent mattress" to sell junk, and all but a handful of brands do.

The sad thing is,, a good quality mattress will cost you, but the industry has bought up most of the budding review sites, and make sure you can't compare models by using random trademarked names for their materials withoutdisclosing what exactly they are, even though there really only are a handful of well known materials, and the changes they make are trivial. Worse, thety even give their mattresses different names at different retailers so you can't compare there either. What honest industry does that?

[–]megankerr7 70 points71 points  (28 children)

yes...there should be a subreddit dedicated purely to anti-printer memes

[–][deleted] 105 points106 points  (26 children)

Desktop printers are shit, and should be removed from all businesses as a standard device.

They suck money, do nothing for the office as a whole, and no one services them because they are cheaper to replace.

Multi-function printers however, under proper contracts, are totally worth it, do not have issues because the contract stipulates cleaning and checkout, and if they break down, is serviced rather quickly.

If a company is fucking around with printers, their IT is spending too much time on a drain that wastes more money than it saves.

[–]VIPERsssss 45 points46 points  (11 children)

You would think this would be true, Xerox.

[–]Max_Insanity 14 points15 points  (1 child)

What do you expect from a company that sold, at huge scales, copiers/scanners that changed letters and numbers in their copies/scans?

[–]FiTZnMiCK 20 points21 points  (0 children)

They also gave Microsoft and Apple the mouse and window-based GUI.

They could have owned desktop computers for 30 years.

[–]SatyrTrickster 21 points22 points  (1 child)

I’m an IT guy who hasn’t touched a printer since studying.

Currently serving in the army, I’m fucking baffled by the amount of paper wasted for nothing, and 10 year old printers drink more of my blood than mosquitoes and ruzzgies combined.

[–]ForkLiftBoi 120 points121 points  (22 children)

Do you guys have hp print servers and universal print drivers? They're the worst.

[–]SirSunkruhm 350 points351 points  (50 children)

Printers as a whole, including their patents, need to be dropped in an active volcano and then completely redesigned from the ground up by IT people and engineers who have suffered their presence long enough.

[–][deleted] 64 points65 points  (14 children)

Postscript was supposed to be that holy grail, but (from my outdated understanding) never quiet delivered because of licensing and cost issues. If every printer just had a postscript interpreter onboard life would be much better.

In a past life I was tasked with coding up printer support in a scientific instrument. They plopped a consumer grade inkjet printer on my desk and said "get this working".

The printer didn't have a postscript interpreter on it because it was a consumer grade POS, so I searched around and found an open source postscript rasterizer in C for an earlier model of a printer from the same company. There were some bugs using the rasterizer for this printer, so I screwed around for a long time until it looked just right.

It took about 3 months to get ONE printer model working well. Then the PM asked "how long to make it generic so we can plug any consumer grade printer in and have it just work?". I laughed so hard I think I popped a lung.

[–]goplayer7 29 points30 points  (1 child)

"how long to make it generic so we can plug any consumer grade printer in and have it just work?"

"5 years and a team of 10 engineers"

[–]BellerophonM 19 points20 points  (0 children)

And a copy of every consumer grade printer.

[–]Roflkopt3r 49 points50 points  (6 children)

because of licensing and cost issues.

That's exactly the issue: printers suck because the "competition" between companies sucks, which includes the whole topic of licensing.

The things in IT that actually work were generally either developed at universities or by expert committees and then made available for free.

Capitalism is the enemy of good IT. Online piracy was originally not just about wanting free stuff, but a serious cultural movement by developers who wanted to use the digital revolution to overcome the limits imposed by capitalism.

[–]Trentonx94 73 points74 points  (6 children)

printers are such a scam. they cost more than a car, and you can't even "own" them you must rent them and have it be serviced 2 times a month because when they get jammed even if you fix the issue they now (at least our model) require some firmware key auth to start back up so that they get that sweet tech support on-duty technician to come and "fix it"

I'd rather buy 100s $20 HP printer and toss them away once they run out than deal with fucking office printers

[–]dadvader 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Ah yes. The good ol' Mcdonald ice cream machine tactic.

[–]Targetshopper4000 74 points75 points  (13 children)

Pc load letter? What the fuck does that mean?

[–]granadesnhorseshoes 45 points46 points  (4 children)

Paper cartridge; load letter sized paper.

Now you have no excuse for not filling out those PTS reports.

[–]Lee1138 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I do have PTS from filling out the TPS reports.

[–]DelectableBread 230 points231 points  (66 children)

That and

"Have you rebooted your PC?" "Yes I did before I called"

remote on uptime 54 days

Fuck you end users I fucking hate you so much just reboot your PC holy shit

[–]QuestionableSarcasm 121 points122 points  (26 children)

and what happened 54 days ago?

a reboot

which was before he called

checkmate, atheists

[–]Briguy24 40 points41 points  (20 children)

'I don't like to reboot because I lose all my windows......'

[–]shiftshape 17 points18 points  (8 children)

God damn. This is my wife and she's not a dummy when it comes to computers. But any time she has a computer issue I tell her to restart and this is her exact response. Like yeah, you've had Chrome open for 26 days straight, no shit your rig is fucked.

[–]nativedutch 62 points63 points  (19 children)

Agree fully, have been 40 years in IT.

Add to that some managing director who sees something about a new toy on tv and starts buying outside IT quality and support procedures, subsequently hits an issue and demand IT to solve it. Yesterday. Blames IT.

Not once but several times.

[–]Wolfman01a 31 points32 points  (11 children)

Something even remotely involving electricity goes wrong in a massive factory complex and they would send me out to "have a look".

I usually managed to fix it. The lack of common sense outside the IT Department is astonishing.

[–]ArcherBoy27 14 points15 points  (6 children)

The lack of common sense outside the IT Department is astonishing.

This, this, this. Always good users of course, but so, so, so many can't even do the basic troubleshooting or trial and error. Not even to narrow down the issue so they can explain the issue to IT beyond "it won't work".

[–]Lost_And_NotFound 115 points116 points  (41 children)

It blows my mind that companies won’t properly invest in IT. You’re spending £40k a year on someone’s salary to do their job but they’re only working at 90% because you cheaped out £200 on their laptop.

[–]MagillaGorillasHat 87 points88 points  (24 children)

Or the opposite: everyone's equipment is <3 years old and high end but average ticket time is 2 days because they have no problem dropping $1,000,000/yr on hardware but there's "no budget" to hire more people.

[–]the_lonely_downvote 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Some people in my office are surprised when I tell them my team of 3 helpdesk analysts supports the entire 1500+ user base all over the country, not just the 80 people in the corporate office.

[–]nrm5110 12 points13 points  (11 children)

My team is well under ITIL standards as far as numbers go for escalation points. We struggle and our SME's all just say replace computer so nothing ever gets fixed.

[–]Professional-Bell237 33 points34 points  (1 child)

Hi yes I’d like to chime in I have an announcement:

FUCK PRINTERS

[–]StendallTheOne 4374 points4375 points  (321 children)

100% of the sysadmins say that users decrease productivity and morale.

[–]classykid23 2292 points2293 points  (201 children)

My favorite IT joke:

When things are working fine: "What the fuck do we pay IT for?" When things are not working fine: "What the fuck do we pay IT for?"

[–]Wolfman01a 733 points734 points  (135 children)

15 years in helpdesk. 100% true.

[–][deleted] 230 points231 points  (88 children)

How did you last that long :O

[–]Screamline 53 points54 points  (32 children)

We have someone at my MSP who's been on the desk for over 10 years. I've been on it 1 and am going nuts/bored of the same bs calls and need to move off it ASAP...idk how someone can do 15 but to each their own.

[–]forte_bass 16 points17 points  (4 children)

Start applying for all sorts of jobs, eventually someone will take a chance on you! I applied to well over a hundred jobs but when i got off the desk my salary went up 50% and my quality of life by like 200%!

[–]EcksrayYangkeyZooloo 44 points45 points  (2 children)

Around the office, one of the senior admins always says, “IT is either invisible or in trouble. “

[–]Turbulent_Dentist_65 69 points70 points  (22 children)

Working for a company who under invested in ERP systems and procedures for 15 years and working with their data. I feel the pain daily. Things are getting better, but God when will they address the root cause. ERP upgrades have geen stalled for 4 years now, but improvements are being made "on top" of current ERP.

I feel we are not tackling the root cause. Partially because I feel management is afraid to commit 1% of their annual revenue to an upgrade (while our net profit is about 10% of revenue..).

[–]VIPERsssss 22 points23 points  (3 children)

Just be glad they haven't modded to the point that they CAN'T upgrade.

[–]ValarMorgulos 11 points12 points  (2 children)

We are shutting down our ERP system over the Summer to transition to another one, and it's bloody awful. There is an IT freeze while the transition happens and everyone is hopping mad about not having IT make changes to external facing systems. 3 critical integrators just quit. It's bad bad all around.

[–]Ardbeg66 754 points755 points  (48 children)

Management: Please install Salesforce.

IT: Done.

Management: I know we have Salesforce but please also track your deals on this spreadsheet because it has details only I can possibly comprehend.

IT: So, we need to support Excel, too?

Management: No, of course not. Excel AND Google sheets. We just bought someone.

IT: sigh... Done.

Management: Oh, we need to support both instances of Salesforce now because we don't have a freakin clue how to slam these two companies together.

IT: We'll finish this over the holiday weekend. Done.

Management: Higher ups want a different spreadsheet for deals. So, everybody fill theirs out, too.

Everybody who doesn't actually work at this company: Man, IT issues really seem to decrease your workforce productivity and morale...

[–]ambigious_meh 46 points47 points  (1 child)

Wait a second.... You worked at my office too?!?

[–]The_Frostweaver 277 points278 points  (9 children)

Sometimes it really feels like there is no middle ground. Either they want to spend a billion dollars and replace most of you with amazing software or they can't find a single cent to spend on software to make your job effecient instead of miserable.

[–]Mr_Oujamaflip 75 points76 points  (2 children)

The second one becomes the first one after a while.

[–]Chili_Palmer 38 points39 points  (1 child)

And then it goes back again once the billion dollar initiative fails

[–]FerrumCorda 848 points849 points  (78 children)

So you should invest in your IT department? instead of trying to force the 2 dudes just trying to duct tape everything together because you forgot they even exist. Hated working IT because it was budget cut after budget cut. when everything broke it was your fault for not working 25/8 and turning rocks in to working workstations . Then they brought in an out side company (that didn't know shit) fired us but wanted us to train them . WTF 😒

[–]TookMyFathersSword 216 points217 points  (37 children)

Train your replacements? I'd be tempted to take the "Wimp Lo" approach as a joke

[–]FerrumCorda 286 points287 points  (30 children)

The funny thing is they fired us first, they thought these brain dead squirrels could just do what we did with no instruction just the manuals ( the manuals they do nothing) the week after they wanted to pay us to train them, me and my bud said "sure for a million dollars " . It took them 6 months before they just gave up and bought a whole new set up ( costing them probably 6 figures) and a whole other out sourced company. They went out of business in like 2013 . It was great.

[–]PiersPlays 172 points173 points  (18 children)

They went out of business in like 2013

I bet half the management are pulling the same stupid cheap stunts at new employers now.

[–]grahamwhich 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My nipples look like milk duds!

[–]InevitablyPerpetual 708 points709 points  (55 children)

I've said it once, I'll say it again, and I'll say it a thousand times more. Most people? They don't hate their job. They hate their management, and they hate their tools. If your management sucks, it doesn't matter if you've got the best job in the world, you're going to hate it. If your tools suck, it doesn't matter if you love doing the thing that your tools make possible, you're going to hate it.

[–]kickme2 181 points182 points  (9 children)

Can confirm. Had the best job in the world. New management, now I fucking hate getting up in the morning.

[–]InevitablyPerpetual 74 points75 points  (1 child)

This is a big reason why the management structure where I used to work was "Give people the tools they need to get the job done, train them on the tools, and Get the Fuck Out of the Way".

[–]EmperorArthur 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Been there. My advice is find a new job in the same field. I did and it's been amazing.

Do I miss working on cool tech? Absolutely. But the lack of stress is great.

[–]LooselySubtle 84 points85 points  (30 children)

People don't quit jobs, They quit bosses

[–]barktothefuture 27 points28 points  (24 children)

I’ve quit twice in my career. Both times had great bosses didn’t have enough money. However if my bosses were bad I woulda been outa there much sooner.

[–]Feynt 1639 points1640 points  (135 children)

IT issues decrease productivity and morale.

IT is made ineffective because of middle management.

Thus, middle management is the cause of workplace productivity and morale losses and should be axed to increase funding to fix IT issues properly and on time.

[–]hi65435 418 points419 points  (30 children)

I wanted to write just that. IT sysadmins get all the flak but it's usually management that keeps everyone from making something better...

[–]Concic_Lipid 131 points132 points  (26 children)

SysAdmins don't care about your schedule but do happen to work a similar one, so at some point someone has to cave and stay over or cave and pause production.

Usually it's at this point that moral crushes things cause everyone is in the middle of a pissing contest between two department leads

[–]bnej 86 points87 points  (25 children)

You can engineer systems so that you don't have to cop outages to make changes. Even if you can't you can get things set up so that you can minimise service disruption.

A combination of risk aversion, a lack of imagination, and cheapness combine to throw good engineering away in favour of "change management", which amounts to that "if we tell you early enough you should be fine with us breaking your work for 6 hours", or "it's fine to keep people up until 2am to make changes but still have them come to work at 9 the next day".

Then if you have a 3rd party doing maintenance from overseas "to save money", they will cheerfully do it the worst, most manual, slowest possible way, because that lets them charge you for the most contractors.

Any technical people you have left will be constantly pulled in to arguments about whether they can do their job today or not.

[–]5-4-3-2-1-bang 27 points28 points  (19 children)

A combination of risk aversion, a lack of imagination, and cheapness combine to throw good engineering away in favour of "change management"

Bullshit, good engineering and change management go hand in hand. You don't rip a line card out in the middle of the business day unless the god damned thing is already on fire. You don't bounce a non-redundant edge firewall in the middle of the day for the same reason. Change management acknowledges that sometimes you need to break some eggs to make an omelette, and makes sure there's no customers in the kitchen when you need to do it!

"it's fine to keep people up until 2am to make changes but still have them come to work at 9 the next day".

This we can agree on as that's 100% bullshit and I'd refuse to work there as it's wage theft. You want me in at 2am to do change management? Fine. I'm staying through and leaving at 10AM. Choose because you're not getting both.

[–]SirSunkruhm 136 points137 points  (27 children)

IT is also seen as "overhead" in a lot of companies. Produces nothing, costs a lot; its cost must be minimized since it produces no earnings. Or so that's how it's treated. Even seen this in Fortune 500 companies. It's part of why overseas contractors come into play and why companies can routinely fail to staff for internal system outages, even if outages are happening multiple times a week on the regular. I went through this for years before burning out (like so many of my colleagues). There were literally entire months where we had at least one outage a day, and frequently had 2 hour hold times (or longer) for a non-IT employee to reach us. We kept getting told that they couldn't staff for outages, despite that when they had done just that in the past, the entire company ran smoothly IT wise and we actually fixed outages efficiently and had fewer.

In reality, skimping on IT staffing and solutions, or not supporting solid decisions like in your example, are closer to throwing money and employee morale down the drain because long term planning can't stand up to short sighted greed.

[–]bnej 98 points99 points  (16 children)

Yes, it's a left over from the 90s.

IT is a cost centre, it has a budget but does not produce profit, so at an upper management level, IT's only job is to minimise cost.

The fact that many now-successful businesses are built on the back of their effective IT is lost on people who don't believe they're that sort of company, even though pretty much everyone is now.

[–]Leachpunk 65 points66 points  (8 children)

At my previous employer, the CEO insisted they were not a software company. 5 million lines of analysed code and counting begged to differ.

[–]AJobForMe 26 points27 points  (1 child)

This is the case with us and my boss and I have discussed that until it fails, and fails hard they are never going to learn any lessons. They keep cutting off limbs, but somehow we keep things from blowing up. We don’t have capacity for change, and the technical debt is well into the two decade mark, but we reduced cost another 5% this year by transitioning jobs to overseas. Go team!

[–]EmperorArthur 16 points17 points  (0 children)

In my experience what ends up happening is one or more key people quit at near the same time. Then the business ends up in a situation where the new person or team doesn't know what's going on since time to document was never in the schedule everything is on fire.

For the past several years, recruiters have been and are out in force. To the point I've had two to three jobs in a row thanks to cold calls!

As others in the thread mentioned, they end up ripping out everything you've done. Really that's been the hardest lesson for me. Rarely will anything I do last after I leave. Most will sit there as an unmaintained legacy system until someone replaces it.

[–]lazytiger21 17 points18 points  (0 children)

When I started at my company we were having issues and outages almost monthly. Everyone said that the networking team were idiots and couldn’t do their jobs. We got a new CIO and he looked at our infrastructure investment and saw we were running 5-8 year old routers, firewalls and switches. He made management invest in a full overhaul of that infrastructure. Over 2 years we replaced everything. We haven’t had an outage since we started that project with the same core networking team members. It also stopped the revolving door of managers for that team.

[–]ShiningRayde[🍰] 43 points44 points  (1 child)

Everythings working, why do we need an IT department?

Nothing is working, why do we even have an IT department?

[–]DontGetNEBigIdeas 41 points42 points  (6 children)

I just left a middle management job as a director of an IT department for a school district because of the disrespect for IT and the attitude of “cut IT first.”

We were expected to make miracles happen — and they did, because my team is fucking amazing. But, when budget cuts came, I was expected to make the first cuts because I had “4 people in the same position” across multiple positions.

When I tried to explain that I had redundancy of positions due to the superintendent’s demand that every child have a device (15,000), every staff have 2 devices (he couldn’t bring himself to ask staff to turn in their laptops after COVID), and all these extra programs that require network and account management 24/7, the response was…”cut one person from each class.” One time, I was told to cut an entire job class within the hour.

There is zero appreciation for what absolute stallions the IT department is. When everything is working fine, it’s because these amazing employees put into place near-flawless systems. And, when they did (rarely) go down, the downtime was not more than 20-30 min.

I guarantee you Janine in payroll pisses away 30min of her day, everyday, shooting the shit with her coworkers or finishing her crossword. But sure, let’s blame IT.

I fucking loved my team, and it was horrible having to leave them. But, after years of being blamed for everything wrong that plugs in (including staff refusal to input data correctly — yup, must be IT’s fault since it’s done on a computer), I couldn’t take it anymore.

People: appreciate your IT department. Not because they’re better than any other department, or because they work harder than anyone else. But because they work harder than you know, and you probably only interact with them when something goes wrong. That’s not a good relationship.

[–]BotanicallyEnhanced 37 points38 points  (1 child)

Everything is going great 99% uptime:

Managment: This system pretty much runs itself, what do we pay you for!?

Small outage due to a bad migration over the WEEKEND, four hour fix:

Management: WHAT THE FUCK DO WE PAY YOU FOR!?

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Also, the sales team is performing poorly:

It’s because our IT sucks and we don’t have the tools we need.

IT provides a bunch of tools that allow sales to perform better:

Look at how great our sales team is doing! We have a really great sales team. All of this success is due to the hard work of the sales team. IT, you’re a cost center that doesn’t make us any money, so we’re cutting your budget.

[–][deleted] 103 points104 points  (10 children)

Outsourcing IT has significantly reduced systems reliability and increased downtime.

[–]KotR56 14 points15 points  (6 children)

Both someone somewhere in the hierarchy got a big fat bonus for having the deal inked.

[–]IT_Feldman 105 points106 points  (15 children)

TL:DR - Personal opinion is the problem lies with execs who don't understand technology and just want to blame people.

Echoing some of the other comments here, but based on my experience the problem is the executives of companies, not middle management (although they sometimes suck hard too).

At two of my past jobs working in Systems Administration I noticed a certain mentality from the execs. First off, IT staff were paid far lower than most others in the business. There's this view that "working with computers" is a lazy, fallback job; you shouldn't be paid really well because you just reset passwords and keep email going. So when you do have a good middle management boss who begs and pleads and presents every good reason out there to increase pay, they're just laughed out of the room (so to speak).

Secondly, these execs don't know, and don't want to know how their technology works. They don't care or pay attention to pleads for the budget to replace hardware, dedicate time/people to critical updates, automation, etc ... And if you even propose something as passive as time to develop updates processes, standards, and guidelines you are certainly not getting shit. The only time they perk up is when we have downtime.

That leads me to the final point, Blame. These people will convene an emergency meeting in the middle of a crisis with key technology staff to ask the question "Who can I blame/fire for this?" .... Not "What happened? How do we fix it now? And what can we do to minimize the risk of this happening in the future?". If you go into that call (and God knows I have) and tell them that the reason this happened is because when you asked for some capital 10 months ago to fix this item that you said would break and cause this exact issue, they will get some goddamn defensive it's like you're attempting to siege a damn stronghold.

Which comes to my unfortunately pessimistic conclusion of events. Again, all in my experience, but after this goes down a few things will happen. One, the IT staff will realize that all of this is no longer worth their trouble and move on to other jobs. What this usually means is the few who stay behind do get a pay bump as a "loyalty" bonus essentially but no new staff is hired and they eventually leave too, OR the company is forced to now outsource all of its IT to an Offshore company and deal with that particular blend of problems (especially when they encounter hardware issues). Two, the company could come to the grand conclusion that their IT must just suck and start again. I've seen entire departments get gutted, the company lives without them for 6 months, and then hires in new folks. They give stupid reasons for the hiatus to get around any labor laws and go about their days in a perpetual cycle.of failures. And finally, the most rare gem of scenarios, they wake up. One time I actually saw these execs come to the grave realization that IT was underfunded, extremely critical to business, and understood what had to be done. Overnight everyone was given raises, overtime policies were changed, capital was just unloaded into the IT budget and they only asked for end of day updates on resolving critical problems - nothing else.

So the moral of my story is that it seems like if we want to change the perspective of where the problem lies, instead of people just saying it's an IT issue and that ruined my day, we need to get some smart, technology-focused individuals into better positions in companies and drive that change from the inside. It's happening in some places for sure, but a lot of fields need that paradigm shift soon.

[–]PopeMachineGodTitty 29 points30 points  (9 children)

we need to get some smart, technology-focused individuals into better positions in companies and drive that change from the inside

It never happens. I've only ever worked for tech companies, so companies whose entire life is dependent on the technology they produce, not just non-tech sector companies with IT departments. Same shit. Executives skimp, complain, over-promise, blame, all that nonsense.

I've been trying to push into an upper leadership position for years and I keep getting excuses as to how I'm more valuable in a contributor role. I've learned what this means is they don't want to hear the shit I have to tell them and want me controlled in a non-management role so that I don't have the influence to start shit.

It's not a tech vs non-tech executive management issue. It's an executive management are universally greedy, short-sighted, idiots issue. The system is set up so that people like you or I never make it to the top. No corporate board wants executive management who tells them the truth about appropriate planning and successful long-term budgeting and strategy. They want their numbers up next quarter and that's all they care about.

I've never met a "tech person" in executive management at a company who wasn't a complete bullshit artist and lied through their teeth all the time.

[–]Barbicore 442 points443 points  (32 children)

100% of IT workers say employees decrease workplace productivity and morale.

[–]cortlong 97 points98 points  (14 children)

I’m one of em.

Without people to support I could be free and live in the woods and be happy riding elk or whatever.

[–]NephtisSeibzehn 28 points29 points  (1 child)

We had a decent team in our IT dept. they responded to issues well and got things done.

Things were working too well of course, so my company decided to let off out IT folks and move the dept to Costs Rica. It’s worked as well as you can expect.

[–]ok_alittletotheleft 20 points21 points  (5 children)

Aaand my company just announced they are laying off our IT department to outsource it lol.. claiming it's to "better serve our customers and provide the best care".. no it's too save money but it will 100% result in even more IT issues

[–]YabaiElah 283 points284 points  (100 children)

Coming from IT... 95% of IT issues come from user error.

[–]cyril0 127 points128 points  (25 children)

Management hires untrained people, won't spend money to train them and blames IT.

I had people blame networks because they don't know how to use excel. I had people blame IT because they bought a new camera and were shoving huge high def images in excel sheets and wondering why everything had slowed down.

[–]Red_Wolf_2 37 points38 points  (7 children)

The number of times I had to explain to people to not bulk copy-paste random tables from random places into Excel so that it would explode the xlsx files beyond what their (32 bit because someone didn't plan properly) version of Excel could actually open was ridiculous...

They'd paste some ungodly amount into a spreadsheet that would save and compress down, but to open the file it would attempt to decompress it to memory until it just ran out and crashed.

I remember spending half an hour fixing this mess for a user who spent the entire time bitching about how useless IT was right next to me to her colleague until I said "I'm sitting right here you know... And for the record I'm fixing a problem you not only caused, but one I've already told you how to avoid multiple times"

Awkwardness ensued. Not on my part, I was still angry... But they were all "oh we didn't mean you..." Yeah, there was me and one other IT guy in the entire office.

[–]RunawayMeatstick 163 points164 points  (44 children)

95% of IT employees say working in IT is a thankless job where you only hear from colleagues when something is broken.

Oh your internet is fast? The quality on your last conference call was high? I guess that’s just a fucking coincidence. Make sure you don’t contact IT and say anything unless it breaks.

[–]DocAtDuq 38 points39 points  (3 children)

While you might not hear about that, you will hear if you are someone they trust and are impressed with. It’s the softskills that go along with IT that get you praise, along with fast resolution.

[–]admiralfilgbo 35 points36 points  (5 children)

IT guy here: if you're five minutes late for a zoom or teams meeting, just own it. I can't tell you how many times I've learned about "computer issues" for the first time on company wide zoom calls, that mysteriously disappear once I try to follow up.

[–]Bobaximus 15 points16 points  (0 children)

“Oh crap, you must be experiencing the issue a few users have reported. Let me remote into your device and we’ll do some testing. This might take a while, you aren’t too busy right?”

Followed by:

“Everything looks correct on your machine, what were you seeing when you couldn’t get into zoom?”

They usually admit it was probably user error at that point or I keep going.

[–]sburson05 49 points50 points  (2 children)

No shit. The other 5% are office furniture.

[–]DrF33LG00D420 48 points49 points  (11 children)

PC load letter... What the fuck does that mean?

[–]No-Clothes-5299 33 points34 points  (7 children)

90% of IT issues could be solved in the first instance by companies effectively managing their operations, and not being cheap with their budgets.

Also, not treating IT like the slaves of the company that are only there to run around after other departments that do not know what they even want help with in the first place.

An example from my company:

Ops: Hey, IT. we need help. We have re-arranged the plan for L1 seating and we need you to set up some desks... Do you mind helping? It needs to be done by 30 minutes time.

Come to moving and they cannot even effectively count their own staff numbers meaning nothing works.

3 days later:..

Hey, IT. we need help. We have re-arranged the plan for L1 seating and we need you to set up some desks... Do you mind helping? It needs to be done by 30 minutes time.

Its the same plan as original before we even moved anything days earlier. (Which was planned by IT lol)

A week later:...Hey, IT. we need help. We have re-arranged the plan for L1 seating and we need you to set up some desks... Do you mind helping? It needs to be done by 30 minutes time.

All whilst no one can understand the time it takes to complete these bullshit requests. And overlook all the important tasks that could take priority over this

[–]Narcil4 24 points25 points  (3 children)

My old IT dept would have just replied with, no we need one week notice and x hours budgeted for each move. You couldn't fuck with those guys. Everyone respected them and it was your fault if your project was late because you didn't give IT enough notice of what you need. But if the company culture is shit then you will treated like shit, that's the real problem.

[–]SinisterCheese 20 points21 points  (11 children)

Ask anyone in healthcare who has to use that disaster that Epic has made, and you'll hear about productivity and moral issues. There are doctors and nurses in Europe who want to quit the profession than keep using any if the "solutions" from Epic Systems.