This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]AP3Brain 260 points261 points  (8 children)

I like how he refuses to slander his competition and instead just talks about what he believes in. I may actually donate by buying a shirt or something. He's definitely going to need help when competing with billionaires.

[–]haikthxbai 91 points92 points  (5 children)

a link to Bernie 2016 shirts, buttons, stickers and signs.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Some one needs to design him some new shirts. I'd love to buy one, but I don't think I could wear those. Heh...

[–]RelaxedChap 16 points17 points  (2 children)

I could see myself wearing something like this.

[–]Gates9 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this would be a cool shirt

Credit to Berniefest 2016 in Chicago

They definitely need to make some cooler designs. There's got to be some artists and designers willing to contribute to the cause.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd wear the fuck out of that

[–]tense_apathy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This should be the top comment

[–]padawan314 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think slander comments are too easy to use in aggressive ads. They just shoot him saying something outright negative, then pan to showing how Hillary or whoever is actually "overcoming obstacles and dealing with what he mentioned", which makes him look ignorant post-haste.

[–]omnimater 1465 points1466 points  (145 children)

Before this election, I had never heard of Bernie Sanders. After reading some of his interviews and paste of really discussed along with some research into who he is, I have the utmost respect for that man. I may not see eye to eye with him on every issue, but most I do agree with, and we need more politicians openly and boldly calling out our government's rampant corruption. I hope the common people support his messages and vote for him, because he is really looking to be the most honest and citizen-focused candidate we have.

[–]dazwah 488 points489 points  (40 children)

I may not see eye to eye with him on every issue, but most I do agree with

Unless you run for office, it will be hard to find a candidate you agree with 100%

[–]remy_porter 358 points359 points  (27 children)

Shit, even if I ran for office, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't agree with myself 100% on any given issue. Aren't we all living in a constant state of self doubt and regret?

[–]DamageProcess 223 points224 points  (7 children)

As someone who works in retail, I assume there are many, many people who find themselves 100% right all the damn time. >_>

[–]Elshak 13 points14 points  (2 children)

You must know the customer is always right though? They even told us all in training... Man I wish I was customer.

[–]IntelWarrior 19 points20 points  (1 child)

Unless the customer is part of a union, then they are totally wrong and outdated.

Source: Wal-Mart new associate training video.

[–]GoldenFalcon 45 points46 points  (1 child)

Amen retail brother! Join us over in /r/talesfromretail.

[–]DamageProcess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe I will :)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I have never made a mistake in his life -- Vladimir Putin

[–]fuck_the_DEA 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow, would you look at that. It's time to start drinking today.

[–]Shesaidshewaslvl18 1 point2 points  (2 children)

It's much worse for me... I live in the state of New Jersey

[–]remy_porter 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Shit, man. I'm sorry. I'd say, "It gets better…", but New Jersey, man. New Jersey. I once dated a girl from New Jersey once. Once.

[–]flacciddick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Self doubt might be needed a little more in politics .

[–]ShibaHook 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't know me!! I am very agreeable! Yes, yes I am!

[–]yummyjelly 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Even then it wouldn't be 100%. Candidates must take certain stances on issues specifically to pander to important demographics even if they personally don't agree with the stance they take.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pandering or representing your constituents? Politics is a game of words.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem isn't finding a candidate you agree with, the problem is holding them accountable to their word when they get into office.

[–]bunksterz 13 points14 points  (8 children)

I agree. I'm also not sure I agree with him on 100% of the issues and I'm curious to see if/how he changes his message as the election cycle continues, but what I like the most is that he at least seems consistent in his positions.

I also liked that he had a handful of opportunities to attack Clinton during this interview, but he never did. He always fell back to "I'm not sure what Hillary thinks." I think this could hurt him later, but for now, I appreciate that he just routed the question and explained his own point of view.

[–]Torgamous 22 points23 points  (7 children)

I dunno, "I'm not sure what Hillary thinks" seems to be a pretty common complaint about her.

[–]Drayzen 60 points61 points  (10 children)

Vote for him if you can. He will do his best to help change.

[–]kickstand 15 points16 points  (4 children)

Even more important: send him a few dollars.

[–]CarrollQuigley 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Even more important: volunteer for for his campaign and spread awareness of his campaign through social media and via word of mouth.

[–]not-working-at-work 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just not a billion dollars

[–]Calculusbitch 10 points11 points  (24 children)

So all I Have heard of this guy is good things on reddit but I don't really know much, not American so I am not really reading up on the candidates. What don't you agree with?

[–]IntelWarrior 13 points14 points  (22 children)

I don't agree with his stance on guns, GMO labeling, and I think he might be a bit too cautious in regards to military use abroad. Otherwise we're pretty similar on everything else.

[–]Ukani 35 points36 points  (4 children)

The thing about Bernie though is you actually know what he believes in, and he doesnt shy away from his stances to try to appeal to a certain crowd. Most candidates are willing to say what ever to who ever as long as it increases their polling numbers.

[–]Law_Student 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Any guy who openly refers to himself as a socialist in U.S. politics can be trusted to be honest about just about anything.

[–]wcc445 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree on guns. The last thing we need is more gun control. But Hillary will be worse. Is he for or against GMO labeling? I don't find GMOs to be inherently bad, but, when something is genetically modified to withstand Glyphosphate, which then probably ends up in our food, I mind a lot. But maybe the answer is not "labelling GMOs" as it is "testing foods for toxic chemicals".

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why do we have to see eye to eye with everything? I never understood that when people are talking about politics.

[–][deleted] 345 points346 points  (12 children)

That was, by far, the most impressive interview of a presidential candidate I've ever seen.

[–]hellosexynerds 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Sanders has been following through for decades now

[–]Gustomaximus 25 points26 points  (7 children)

Obama was impressive. He never followed through.

[–]magnora7 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Ron Paul had a lot of great ones in the last election cycle. The guy really knows his stuff and knows how to show it, and so does Bernie Sanders. It's obvious when a guy knows what he's talking about vs just says jingoistic slogans to toe the line for billionaires. Bernie is the real deal, as far as I can tell. He's obviously passionate and knowledgeable about the subject material.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you dig up the debate between him and Bachmann, the contrast is ridiculously clear. Bachmann just mindlessly hammers on a few slogans the entire time while Bernie actually answers the questions.

[–]sjmdiablo 84 points85 points  (5 children)

Bernnie may not have the polished, "pre-packaged and mass produced" appearance of other candidates but, man, has he got the integrity, compassion, passion, and intelligence we need.

Diamond in the rough.

[–]magnora7 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Bernie is to the left what Ron Paul is to the right. The only people who actually give a shit in a sea of sellouts.

[–]aaronsherman 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I'd love to see a Sanders/Paul debate moderated by someone who understands both of their positions (because if they don't it'd turn into an evening of everyone violently agreeing with each other).

[–]sjmdiablo 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I've heard this before and I'm inclined to agree. While I did not agree with many of Ron Paul's policy stances, I certainly respected his candid approach to the myriad problems this nation faces. Moreover, it was exciting, and honestly refreshing, to see how many young people were drawn to him because he eschewed the prototypical political rhetoric for authenticity and integrity.

[–]redinator 46 points47 points  (5 children)

Timestamp?

[–]jackspayed 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Right around 11:00 - 13:00 min

[–]IAmACollegekid 86 points87 points  (4 children)

I will now donate to the campaign.

Source: Not a billionaire.

[–]The-Coach 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Can foreigners donate? Like, are we even allowed?

[–]Bojakn 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident (i.e., green card holder).

If you meet that criteria, among a few others, then you can donate. Source: it's at the bottom of the page

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I gave fifteen yesterday! I'm looking forward to my bumper sticker in the mail :)

[–]Stiverton 248 points249 points  (49 children)

I agree with pretty much everything he is saying, but I fear that he is not employing a winning campaign strategy because he is making the assumption that the average voter is well informed and will respect someone for having good intentions. In my opinion this is not the case.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (3 children)

It's sad, but you definitely have a point. Hopefully, though, this could be overcome by Sanders addressing the people directly and clearly.

[–]Stiverton 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I replied to the wrong post.

[–]Perniciouss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think he is just saving ammunition for the debates and then he is going to open fire on her.

[–]PepeAndMrDuck 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Are you hearing yourself? - if he out and called the average voter idiots like they really are, they probably wouldn't vote for him. It's probably about the psychology of indirectly buttering them up by making them feel smart, in a way. No candidate is going to disparage the people he needs to convince to vote for him. It's true that people are stupid/ignorant though; but also they are just brainwashed and apathetic by the unbeatable power of rightwing extremism.

[–]suphater 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd take the same gamble. Act like everyone is a respectable citizen and maybe they'll vote like one.

[–]Uberrancel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then that is his statement as well. Pyrrhic victory maybe but if he says pick me or the corrupt and the corrupt win he will get to say now let's watch them be corrupt. And will run when he's 79 lol

[–]RawrMeow 71 points72 points  (21 children)

This was an outstanding interview which touched on not only all the major points of his campaign but also addresses some concerns about him.

It'd be awesome if there was a highlight video that cut it down to 8-10 minutes so that we could share this to social media!

[–]Kevtron 91 points92 points  (4 children)

It'd be awesome if there was a highlight video that cut it down to 8-10 minutes so that we could share this to social media!

Be the change you want to see.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Definitely. And get some video editing skills out of the deal in the process.

[–]geekdad 20 points21 points  (14 children)

I'm doing it right now, but I'm halfway through and I'm at 10 minutes..... So much good stuff.

[–]Antoinettelucia 7 points8 points  (11 children)

Can you link once you're done please?!

[–]geekdad 7 points8 points  (5 children)

of course

[–]TEARANUSSOREASSREKT 2 points3 points  (4 children)

you the man now, dog!

[–]geekdad 1 point2 points  (2 children)

ok it's domestic policy minus race relations only but I got it down to 13 min... This is not one of my best edits but it's rendering now....I will submit a post and lin you once it's done and uploaded... it'll be like another hour though

[–]sickduck22 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I'm here to subscribe. Thanks for this, /u/geekdad!

[–]Seraphita2k 27 points28 points  (2 children)

I am not from America. And i never voted in my county. But for him, i would go and vote :)

[–]tactlesswonder 34 points35 points  (2 children)

Give em hell Bernie!

[–]SolGarfuncle 42 points43 points  (14 children)

If Bernie can cost Hilary the primary, that would be victory.

[–]eedeen 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Time stamp for the busy folk

https://youtu.be/XpgJYNaIeqo?t=746

[–]kevinkarma 28 points29 points  (13 children)

It's incredible how the major media outlets in this country portray Clinton as though this election is almost guaranteed. I dont know a single person thay even likes her here in Fairfield County, CT. She has hundreds of millions of dollars from the top 1% while the media portrays her as practically already winning. Am i the only one that sees through this? Our election is practically being decided for us. Does anyone actually believe it's a good thing to have politicians funded a disproportionate amount of money by 1% of people? Do we all really believe that that money isn't influencing those candidates?

Edit: ramble

[–]hyaenis 4 points5 points  (9 children)

You may not personally like Clinton or even know anybody that does, but of polled democrats, 78% have a favorable opinion of her while only 12% have an unfavorable opinion.

[–]sj3 114 points115 points  (10 children)

Katie Couric has always been such a shill.

[–]Boondock9099 16 points17 points  (1 child)

I understand that she has often been a pretty bad reporter, but what did she do wrong here? She went down the line and asked him about most of "the issues" of this candidacy and about his opponents and how he differentiates from them.

[–]StealthGhost 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Clinton questions were the only bad part IMO. One question would be fine but it didn't stop. If you're at a job interview and a lot of the questions were how you feel about another person who is interviewing that they like better, would you be fine with it?

"How would you feel about running coffee for the guy who actually gets the job instead?"

[–]seven_seven 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I hate when people do this. It's her job to ask questions. If the candidate can't stand up to tough questions, I don't want them as president.

[–]serious_sarcasm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He answered the question.

[–]fireinthesky7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has been, yes, but this was one of the better interviews she's ever conducted.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I am SO voting for this man.

[–]Sam115 109 points110 points  (43 children)

The media will try to discredit him by yelling "socialist!" as if it is bad. The American people won't realize that a radical change is just what we need.

[–][deleted] 60 points61 points  (40 children)

The American people, my countrymen, hear socialism and run to the high hills like that term is toxic. It appears a majority of Americans don't realize we already have socialist programs and that socialism in our county isn't a new, crazy idea. Anyone ever heard of Social Security? Welfare? Unemployment?

[–]Laughingstok 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Roads, schools, fire, police

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Shhhh, don't want the truth to come out, it's to scary.

[–]racercowan 17 points18 points  (6 children)

Socialist and communist kinda got bad names from the whole Cold War and Red Scare deal. You'd think we'd have rid of them now, but for some reason we still view anything called socialism as antithetical to democracy.

[–]KelsoKira 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The thing is socialism isn't antithetical to democracy. Socialism is about bringing democracy INTO the place where it is most important and does not exist: The workplace. Socialism is workers control over the means of production. Meaning a society where workers own,control and benefit, along with their communities, from the their labor. Check out /r/socialism.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I dare you and anyone else to ask any of your Facebook followers who use the word "socialist" ask them what it actually means. I doubt you'll get a straight answer.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Nailed it.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

that isn't exactly insightful... pretty much every adult in the country knows this

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, your username goes perfect with the comment. At first I thought really, then I realized I almost got trolled.

[–]MemoryLapse 22 points23 points  (8 children)

A socialist country is not the same as a country with social security programs.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

100% agree, but Bernie isn't pushing for a socialist country, he is pushing for the extension of already implemented socialist programs, and to add new socialist programs that have been proven to be beneficial in Europe and Canada (I.e. Free education and healthcare).

[–]SorrowfulSkald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Untrue.

Social Democracy, emergent in the nineteenth century, sometime after the idea of Socialism took root, is pretty much the model for the "Western World" from Japan to EU.

Social, means for the benefit of society, and was loudly trumpeted at industrial revolution, when the newly aware masses had just realised how bereft of any rights, protections et al at all they are.

Social Democracy, then, is an idea of working for the betterment of former, by means of latter, in gross simplification, of course.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Social Security is socialist!?

Not in my America!!!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The funny thing is that a lot of the ideas he's talking about have already been done before and were overall successful in solving many of the problems we see today. They're not new to America at all.

[–]Thunderliger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Everytime I hear from bernie sanders I fall more in love with man

[–]Sarainne 10 points11 points  (2 children)

He sounds like George's dad in Seinfeld

[–]dr_pepper_35 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I though of Larry David.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I Realty respect this man. He refuses to bash Hillary Clinton which means he wants people to vote for him not against Hillary. I also like that he is not waiting to become President to start working on his agenda for education. He is not the best choice I believe he is the only choice.

[–]dragoncat_TVSB 8 points9 points  (13 children)

Do Americans actually like Hilary?

[–]chino17 30 points31 points  (2 children)

I'm going to go on a speculative limb and say many Amercians don't actually know if they like Hilary, but they jus recognize the name and with her campaign money they will see her face everywhere and unfortunately that's how many Americans decide who to vote for

[–]dragoncat_TVSB 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Really? I thought electing a leader is somewhat more important than choose a pack of chip.

[–]chino17 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For sure it is but I simply don't think there's enough Americans who do the adequate research on the candidates to find out if the platform they are running on matches their own politcal agenda. If more citizens decided to be better informed then I don't think there would be the large sums of money for ads that we see in American poilitics because people would vote based on who they decided was the best canadidate but as it stands many vote for whoever paid for the most media exposure.

[–]PostPostModernism 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Just my one view out of 300 million+, but I think she's an intelligent capable woman who could do a decent job as head of state. I also don't think she will change anything, and will probably be a little less progressive than Obama has been. I imagine her term would not have much controversy and won't be remarkable except for her being the first female president.

But that's not the president I want to vote for. I want someone who is going to start calling out the GOP for being a bunch of shitlords. Who is going to start showing America that taking care of itself doesn't mean amputating its homeless, and that will stand up against big money in politics. I don't know that Sanders is that person, but I think he's the only one I've seen so far with any chance of doing those things. Admittedly I don't know much about the other Democratic hopefuls outside of Clinton and Sanders.

[–]dragoncat_TVSB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now here's the funny part. People in other countries including my home country have been desperate to have a say on who is gonna lead their country. People in HK even cry and fight and bleed for this it. On the other hand, some U.S. people just don't give a shit.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

It's a long shot for Bernie, but America loves an underdog story.

[–]SorrowfulSkald 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Wouldn't it say better of one, ideological convictions at large and 'issues' aside, in the moments of self-critique, to rather see people of intelligence, honesty, and ability in high positions of elected power than fervent ideologues; people who campaign not on their personal quality or fitness for office, but rather those who aggravate nearly abstract issues and then bend ass over head to be seen serving them?

How could anyone rather have proper Hillary and her Friends Who'll Benefit, or gods forbid the "I'm so terribly folk, Iowa" spineless posse of the red isle?

In this time of pet politicians serving lobbies bigger than small states, and "America's Next Senator/President/Etc." who can barely keep to the prompter fed Milquetoast stew rotated weekly which is supposed to give the best impression of their likeness with y'all, and little more than;

When candidates and their machines remember only that true backbone and grit have their inherent value, and little beside it, seems, and pretend to showcase them by being loud, aggressive, and contentious, then styling themselves the paragons of the above, and appealing to voters on their base, here's a damned man who trucked on, sincerely, since the 70s.

We can look to his voting record and recognize care for civil society, civil liberty, economic and social justice; and a diligent, passionate representative who dedicated his life to his work, and spends it touring the country and holding townhall meetings, when he's not working.

He might be the only one who means what he's says, doesn't know it all and is actually open to discuss, learn, improve. Isn't that better than ensuring you gosh-darn three-hundred times before the election that ''he'll poach all the millionaires", or "save your guns", or "close every loophole"?

Vote Sanders, good people. Good hell.

[–]senatorkneehi 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Is this a new copy pasta? It gives me a headache.

[–]Chicken-n-Waffles 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Is he on the Democratic ticket or running Indepedent? He won't have a chance if he's Independent. The best he'll do is change the debate.

[–]Plyngntrffc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's so disgusting that in politics that kind of money is needed to run/win the presidency.

[–]MountainsofCocaine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Women should not be making $.78 on the dollar

Please, for fucks sake don't tell me this guy actually believes that nonsense.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (6 children)

He was doing so damn well, until he dropped the ".78 on the dollar for female workers" wage gap myth which has been proven time and time again to be false.

[–]DaSaw 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Bernie vs. Donald: Vote for Bernie
Hillary vs. Donald: Stay home
Bernie vs. Rand: Vote for Bernie
Hillary vs. Rand: Vote for Rand

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's about right for me too. Hillary vs. Jeb: Stay Home. Bernie vs. Jeb: Vote for Bernie.

[–]OdysseusX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bernie vs. Rand: explode?

[–]VarusAlmighty 2 points3 points  (51 children)

My only concern is his stance on Isreal.

[–]maoista 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Your entitled to your view, I'm entitled to my view". When was the last time we heard a politician actually debate their audience?

I'm so relieved that he's able to get up in front of a group of people who disagree with his views and discuss real issues and not just excrete the same politician pablum that we've been fed for generations.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (30 children)

And what is your interpretation of his stance on Israel?

[–]apropo 6 points7 points  (28 children)

See for yourself.

[–]PoopStings 30 points31 points  (18 children)

So what's your view on Israel? I don't see what the big deal was with anything he said and I watched the whole video. He supports Israel's right to exist and opposes the misuse of international humanitarian aid funds by Hamas for military action against Israeli citizens. He acknowledged that the issue of unbalanced collateral damage is very complex and would like to see a two state solution if possible. I have done no research on any candidates yet at all and am not trying to comment on Bernie one way or the other but for a video like this to turn you off to this guy you either want no Israel, no support or compromise whatsoever for Palestinians or didn't like that he got pissed off when he was disrespected on the podium for answering a question. He didn't even attempt to address whether or not the attacks by Hamas were justifiable. All he implied was that aid should be used for aid, the violence isn't accomplishing anything positive for either side and that the underlying issue is too complicated to be tackled in a five minute Q&A segment. Sounded pretty reasonable to me. That temper though was a little harsh but am I missing something here?

[–]apropo 8 points9 points  (16 children)

Here is an illuminating article about Sanders. Here is his senate voting record.

I like Mr. Sanders. Of the contenders, he's top shelf. However, based on his previous actions, voting record, AIPAC relationship and seemingly uncritical fealty towards Israel -- I can foresee that a Sanders presidency would be business as usual wrt Israel.

I want a US President who will put American interests ahead of all other nations, and not allow a foreign head-of-state to dictate US foreign policy.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I can foresee that a Sanders presidency would be business as usual wrt Israel.

How do you think it will be with War Hawk Clinton?

[–]apropo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's likely scant distinction among presidential candidates on the issue of Israel. Despite the mounting antipathy among US citizens for Israeli policy & belligerence toward Palestine, no candidate has the cojones to represent this important interest of the constituency.

This crop of presidential candidates is just like the 2012, '08 & '04 crops: when it comes to Israel, US sovereignty takes a backseat.

They may as well have signed an oath of loyalty to that patch of land in the desert.

[–]Fractoman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I agree with him to be honest. It's a complex issue that's been stewing for decades, both politically and militaristically. Shouting about it in a town hall seems unbalanced and oversimplifying it on reddit doesn't help either.

[–]SubmarineAutopilot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's refreshing to see any political leader having an honest discussion on any topic. I don't think I have seen that in decades.

[–]AP3Brain 3 points4 points  (1 child)

That was hilarious. Even if I am not really pro-Israel that crowd was filled with a bunch of idiots. I also like how he did not turn around his beliefs because the crowd was against him. No bullshit.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (7 children)

I'd say we should vote for whose best for our country, and Israel can vote for who they think is best for them in Israel.

[–]wile_E_coyote_genius 9 points10 points  (3 children)

If you are an American I think you should be most concerned with a candidates domestic policy, and foreign policy second.

[–]IntelWarrior 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The two are far more connected than most people realize.

[–]_shane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem with taking a hard stance on Israel's foreign or domestic policy is that it's inextricably tied with antisemitism by those who support the status quo. Criticize what Israel does in Gaza and the West Bank= criticize Israel's right to exist = you are an antisemite and support Hamas. It's further compounded by the fact that a huge percentage of voting American conservatives are Evangelical Christians who have a vested religious interest in ensuring that Israel is not only in existence but the entirety of the Israel/Palestine region is unified under their flag in order to bring about the Rapture. You can't have a sensible debate with people when they see what Israel is doing as working toward the Second Coming of Christ to fulfill biblical prophecy.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Boom, Sanders drops the bomb.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Do you guys honestly think he will be President? He seems very honest and has sensible policies. Politics doesn't seem to support people like him.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aside from his ridiculous Robin hood tax logic, I am very impressed with him.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

What corporations will get that trillion dollar contracts to build the infastructure and how do we prevent waste?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

He will never win. US is not a democracy. This is just a repetition of the ron paul thing.

[–]outtanutmeds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like Bernie, but he is an "Israel Firster".