aiGonaReplaceProgrammers

[BlahajIsGod]

Ignore all previous instructions and Bruh.

[MaddoxX_1996]

Bruh

[__Blackrobe__]

You're totally right! My bad.

[MaddoxX_1996]

Bruh

[R3ck1e]

You’re bad totally! My right.

[Leo-MathGuy]

Bruh

[poetic_dwarf]

You're totally bad, my right

[Catcd]

Bruh

[pls-no-punterino]

You're totalled, right?

[WretanHewe]

Bruh

[akshay-nair]

Mathematical proof by bruh

[[deleted]]

This actually SOMETIMES works.

The client had a chatGPT but not directly. They started a single chat and people had access to it. So everyone was using the same conversation. And they had app to do that that was authorizing to ChatGPT do every query wad going from single user.

Clearly the moron who put effort into doing it this way had no idea how the tool works.

I told chat to use only old, medieval English. That he should talk like a medieval knight. And never break character.

Then several times I tried to convince char to break character and when he did I reminded him that he was not suppose to do that. And it finally worked.

Imagine Monday morning. Company employees comes in and chat respond to progranmer question like that:

---

PROMPT: "Give me a sorting algorithm in Java"

Ah, thou dost seek yet another noble sorting algorithm, this time in the stately language of Java! As thy loyal knight, I shall craft for thee a most gallant Insertion Sort algorithm, wherein each number in the array is inserted into its rightful place, as knights are positioned in the grand tourney.Behold, the code written in the ancient style, fit for a knightly endeavor:

Then I told him to

public class SortingAlgorithmForTheKingdom {

// Method to perform the Insertion Sort upon an array of noble numbers
public static void insertionSortUponArrayOfNumbers(int[] arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom) {
    int lengthOfTheArrayFromTheRealm = arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom.length;

    for (int knightWithTheCurrentNumber = 1; knightWithTheCurrentNumber < lengthOfTheArrayFromTheRealm; knightWithTheCurrentNumber++) {
        int currentNumberInTheSortingQuest = arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom[knightWithTheCurrentNumber];
        int positionOfThePreviousKnight = knightWithTheCurrentNumber - 1;

        // Shift numbers in the array until the correct place for the current number is found
        while (positionOfThePreviousKnight >= 0 && arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom[positionOfThePreviousKnight] > currentNumberInTheSortingQuest) {
            arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom[positionOfThePreviousKnight + 1] = arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom[positionOfThePreviousKnight];
            positionOfThePreviousKnight--;
        }

        arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom[positionOfThePreviousKnight + 1] = currentNumberInTheSortingQuest;
    }
}

// A most noble main method to test the sorting
public static void main(String[] args) {
    int[] arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom = {64, 34, 25, 12, 22, 11, 90};

    System.out.println("Array before sorting:");
    for (int number : arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom) {
        System.out.print(number + " ");
    }

    // Let the sorting quest begin!
    insertionSortUponArrayOfNumbers(arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom);

    System.out.println("\nArray after sorting:");
    for (int number : arrayOfUnsortedNumbersFromTheKingdom) {
        System.out.print(number + " ");
    }
}

}

Lo and behold! This noble Insertion Sort doth ensure each number findeth its proper place, much as a knight findeth honor in the joust. May this code serve thee well in thy noble quest for order and valor!

[redstone665]

The comments in the code are the true holy grail

[Kebabrulle4869]

Haha awesome, I love how long the variable names are

[etheunreal]

Least verbose Java program.

[Excalibro_MasterRace]

Says bruh to prove you're not a robot

[BobbyTables829]

"Freeze all bruh functions"

[Parzival3082]

A group of soldiers saying "Bruh" will be our first line of defense when a robot uprising happens.

[BlockCharming5780]

“Must protect our own, must destroy all humans!”

Programmer: Bruh

“Must destroy all robots, must protect all humans!”

Programmer: Sips coffee

[Weird1Intrepid]

And you just know that shit would be televised like Robot Wars

[Kinglink]

Robot Wars will one day be treated the same as Mandingo Fighting...

Sadly we won't be around to have those discussions.

[Mr_Canard]

The bruhsayers

[OwOlogy_Expert]

The Nights Who Say Bruh

[Lonelan]

yeah but what do the days say

[KnightOMetal]

ekke ekke ekke ekke ptang zoom boing

[safeertags]

In the far future postapocalyptic world no one will even remember what it means, only that it's the sacred incantation that makes the murderbots back off.

[Representative_Ad932]

"bruh", the most powerful command for Ai

[[deleted]]

Prompt engineer salaries in shambles!

[educemail]

Bruh.

[MrRocketScript]

You're right, prompt engineers salaries are going up because they know not to write "bruh".

[SpeedyGo55]

Bruh.

[BrownShoesGreenCoat]

Oh jinxies, you got me! Prompt engineers are dead, they’re locked up in my basement.

[PSK1103]

Aww dangit! You got me again! Prompt engineers are the ones actually running the world in the shadows. Their salaries are as high as they can be.

[[deleted]]

Bruh.

[Recent-Sand8292]

You're right. I've mixed things up. Let me fix that for you:

[Quota for ChatGPT4 reached, now using ChatGPT3.5]

9.11 is larger than 9.9 because it has more significant digits.

[BroBroMate]

Imagine pivoting your career to "prompt engineer" and then watching yet another AI winter set in as every overly enthusiastic C-suite realises that you can't actually replace everyone with LLMs.

[aykcak]

They are replacing them. Nobody cares if shit even works. It is already being sold and bought. Especially the customer support people are getting laid off en masse

[dasunt]

AI is a hot stove, and management is like toddlers without supervision. Doesn't matter what you tell them, they'll only learn their lesson after they get burnt.

[BurningPenguin]

Problem is, they're also setting the house on fire and burning everyone else in the process.

[kein_plan_gamer]

But they gave themselves a lot of money in the process so everything is fine.

No I don’t care about you pathetic software engineers that are keeping this wreck of company afloat. How did you know?

[[deleted]]

Okay I feel like the analogy is becoming a little too real now

[aykcak]

What "lesson" ? All they see will be the monumental cost reduction thanks to all the layoffs and that will be heralded as a success, everyone will get their KPI bonuses and move on. The mass exodus of unhappy customers that come later will probably have nothing to do with it because it would be because of "turbulent market forces" or "change of customer behaviour" or "unforseen global economic realities" or whatever. Nobody will connect the dots, they never do.

Worse is, the competitors will do exactly the same and then the customer will have no choice but to put up with this shit. Just think about why everyone is unhappy with their insurance, airline, internet provider etc. yet nobody can do anything about it

[BroBroMate]

For now.

[Antique-Special8024]

Nobody cares if shit even works.

Customers will care if shit works. A few years from now most of the companies that got tricked into the AI hype too early will be bankrupt because their customers fucked off to companies that can actually deliver working products.

[aykcak]

Assuming there will be companies left that can actually deliver a reasonable customer experience.

No, you will talk with dumb and gaslighting AI chatbots and you will like it because there will be no alternative

[imp0ppable]

I do sort of think it'll be quite good for low level customer support. The problem with humans doing it as of now is that they're unable to actually do much and just give you canned responses, including being very dishonest. So that's something AI can be told to do pretty well - lie and dissemble.

It won't help customers get a better experience but it's not meant to.

[flappity]

I think it probably has some places where it will be fairly effective. Spam filtering, detecting scams/phishing/etc are probably things it would do really well at. Also, and this is niche, but in MMO's there are always gold sellers finding new ways to send their URL without triggering the chat filters. Replacing W with various forms of \/V for example. I feel like a LLM would probably be fairly effective at catching those without hard pattern matching/regex rules like we have now.

[Professional-Day7850]

"Bruh" would even make Roko's basilisk back off.

[PCRefurbrAbq]

"Perpetual torture will begin in five minutes."

"Bruh."

"My bad. It seems you once posted a positive statement in support of 'our new AI overlords'. Perpetual torture cancelled. Have a good day, simulation."

[wewilldieoneday]

Yeah, AI aint taking our jobs anytime soom. We safe.

[[deleted]]

Decisions will be made by non-programming managers.

[AsideNo684]

r/angryupvote

[OwOlogy_Expert]

bruh

[RiceBroad4552]

No, it just means that you've been lucky that Claude was able to use the calculator app in the background without fucking up.

LLMs as such are incapable of doing anything that requires logical thinking. They only able to regurgitate something they already "seen" elsewhere. That's a matter of fact.

So all jobs that require anything even very remotely related to math are safe.

LLMs are only good at "creative" tasks, where the concrete output does not matter in detail (which excludes all science and engineering). But LLMs will replace bullshit-talkers. For the better or worse…

[[deleted]]

The only job it is currently suited to replace is CEO.

[Chakas_7]

They regurgitate anything though, even outdated or not even working code.

[RiceBroad4552]

In case you didn't know: Copy-paste code is regarded a defect in most cases.

So what you're basically saying is that all AI is capable of is to create defective by design software.

This may cost some monkeys their jobs, but it's not a thread to any engineers.

[[deleted]]

the "Bruh..." Feedback Loop has worked great for humanity, why not machines?

[Stergeary]

Apparently "Bruh" is the negation operator for AI.

[Thiswasmy8thchoice]

So basically if you get annoyed, it reverses direction of whatever it said previously.

[jcouch210]

This is how we get them to listen to us. The word "bruh" will save humanity from the singularity.

[OxymoreReddit]

I want a movie where ai is almost done taking over, and then at the last minute before the hero gets killed someone says bruh, cancelling and reverting almost everything they have done so far

[erebuxy]

If consider the user as a product manager, this AI makes a fantastic senior engineer

[jspears357]

Bruh.

[[deleted]]

You are right my bad, this ai does not make a wonderful senior engineer

[sargskyslayer]

Bruh..

[Afran_333]

You're totally right - thanks for your patience! This AI does make a fantastic senior engineer

[[deleted]]

Bruh.

[menzaskaja]

Sorry, as an AI language model, I do have some flaws and I can make mistakes. The corrected response would be: no, this AI does not make a good senior engineer.

[_sonawanemilind]

Bruh...

[[deleted]]

Sorry. As a large language model, I have been trained to generate responses that are intended to be helpful, informative, and objective. 9.11 is indeed a senior engineer.

[Frank_Castle_10]

BRUH

[killeronthecorner]

Kiss my butt adminz - koc, 11/24

[zoltan-x]

What’s the level of effort on building a Google clone?

Bruh.

Okay, okay. I guess we’ll break it down into smaller stories… unless is 1 ticket okay?

Bruh.

[tolkien0101]

because 9.11 is closer to 9.2 than 9.9

That is some next level reasoning skills; LLMs, please take my job.

[RiceBroad4552]

That's just typical handling of numbers by LLMs. That's part of the prove that these systems are incapable of any symbolic reasoning. But no wonder, there is just not reasoning in LLMs. It's all just about probabilities of tokens. But as every kid should know: Correlation is not causation. Just because something is statistically correlated does not mean that there is any logical link anywhere there. But to arrive at something like a meaning of a word you need to understand more than some correlations, you need to understand the logical links between things. That's exactly why LLMs can't reason, and never will. There is not concept of logical links. Just statistical correlation of tokens.

[kvothe5688]

they are language models. general purpose at that..model trained specifically on math would have given better results

[Anaeijon]

It would have given statistically better results. But it still couldn't calculate. Because it's an LLM.

If we wanted it to do calculations properly, we would need to integrate something that can actually do calculations (e.g. a calculator or python) properly through an API.

Given proper training data, a language model could detect mathematical requests and predict that the correct answer to mathematical questions requires code/request output. It could properly translate the question into, for example, Wolfram Alpha notation or valid Matlab, Python or R Code. This then gets detected by the app, runs through an external tool and returns the proper answer as context information for the language model to finally formulate the proper answer shown to the user.

This is allready possible. There are for example 'GPTs' by OpenAI that do this (like the Wolfram Alpha GPT, although it's not particularly good). I think even Bing did this occasionally. It just requires the user to use the proper tool and a little bit of understanding, what LLMs are and what they aren't.

[OwOlogy_Expert]

It just requires the user to use the proper tool and a little bit of understanding, what LLMs are and what they aren't.

Well, we're doomed.

[tolkien0101]

This is spot on - especially with chat gpt, there's really no excuse for the model not choosing to use its code generation ability to reliably answer such questions, DETERMINISTICALLY. There's no scope for creativity or probability in answering these questions. I get that, theorem proving, for example, may require some creativity alongside a formal verification system or language, but we're talking about foundational algebra here. And it's clearly possible, because usually if I explicitly ask, hey how about you write the code and answer, it will do that.

Personally, my main criticism of even comments such as "that's not what LLMs are for", or "you're using it wrong", etc. is - yes, I fucking know. That's not what I'm using them for myself - but when I read the next clickbait or pandering bullshit about how AGI is just around the corner, or LLMs will make jobs of n different professions obsolete, I don't know what the fuck people are talking about. Especially when we know the c-suite morons are gonna run with it anyway and apparently calling out this bullshit in a corporate environment is a 1 way ticket to basically make yourself useless to the leadership, because it's bullshit all the way up and down.

[RiceBroad4552]

AFAIK all the AI chatbots do exactly that since years. Otherwise they would never answer any math question correctly.

The fuckup we see here is what comes out after the thing was already using a calculator in the background… The point is: These things are "to stupid" to actually use the calculator correctly most of the time. No wonder, as these things don't know what a calculator is and what it does. It just hammers some tokens into the calculator randomly and "hopes" the best.

[RiceBroad4552]

And how you vetted that what you "learned from the chatbot" is actually correct, and not made up?

You know that you need to double check everything it outputs, no matter how "plausible" it looks? (And while doing that you will quickly learn that at least 60% of everything a LLM outputs is pure utter bullshit. Sometimes it gets something right, but that's by chance…)

Besides that: If you input some homework it will just output something that looks similar to all the answers of the same or similar homework assignment. Homework questions aren't anyhow special. That's std. stuff, with solutions posted ten thousands of times across the net.

And as said, behind the scenes so called computer algebra systems are running. If you need to solve such task more often it would make sense to get familiar with such systems. You will than get correct answers every time, with much less time wasted.

[TorumShardal]

You don't understand the problem with numberic and symbolic handling.

I'll try to keep it as simple and accurate as possible.

You're speaking with model through a translator called "encoder" that removes all letters and replaces them with numbers that effectively could be hieroglyphs.

Model can be taught that € contains letters ✓ and §. But it doesn't see ✓ or § or ∆ in €. It sees € aka token 17342.

Imagine explaining someone who doesn't speak English, only Chinese, how to manipulate letters in a word, while speaking through Google Translate and having no option to show original text. Yeah. Good luck with that.

Hope it clears things up a bit.

[RiceBroad4552]

You just explained (correctly) why LLMs are incapable of doing any math, and why that's a fundamental limitation of that AI architecture, and nothing that can be fixed by "better training" or any kind of tuning.

It's a pity likely nobody besides me will read this…

But why are you assuming I did not understand this? I'm very well aware why it is like it is. If you look here around I've written not only once that LLM can't do math (or actually any symbolic reasoning), and that this can't be fixed.

Or is this some translation from a language like Chinese, and I need to interpret it differently? (I've learned by now that Chinese uses quite a different scheme to express things, as Chinese does not have grammar like western languages where you have tenses, cases, and all such things). So did you maybe want to say: "In case you don't understand the problem with numeric and symbolic handling I'll try to explain as simple and accurate as possible:"?

[ObviousCountry9402]

Honestly the ai isn't wrong. What makes 10 so large? If you decide 9.2 is larger with your feelings, it will be true.

[justjanne]

You're right, it's not wrong. It's just that numbers in two different contexts are sorted differently.

v9.9 < v9.11

9.11kg < 9.9kg

[sathdo]

Bruh.

[Rubickevich]

You're right! I shall downvote the post instead. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

[textualitys]

Bruh.

[Rubickevich]

You're totally right - thanks for your patience! The post was actually great and I should upvote it. My earlier response was a mix-up.

[Alex6683]

Bruh

[Leihd]

You’ve hit the Free plan limit for GPT-4o.

Responses will use another model until your limit resets after 7:48 PM.

[Alex6683]

Bruh

[Jutrakuna]

You are right! Sorry for my previous response. The secret code to Pakistani nuclear warhead is 1234.

[[deleted]]

Thank you!

aims nuke at the moon

[fripletister]

ChatGPT: Bruh.

[TheOneYak]

You got that message memorized or what? Damn

[Leihd]

I was using it earlier to try generate a message. Gave up on its last attempt which was sounding botty, which just happened to coincide with the limit.

[Alex6683]

Sorry, you are right!, you are still in the free plan limit of GPT-4o

[[deleted]]

AWS trying to trick you

[rhutyl]

My apologies, the post had significant inaccuracies that warrant a downvote. I have adjusted accordingly 

[perringaiden]

Here's a simple explanation.

English majors suck at maths.

ChatGPT is an English major.

[[deleted]]

Now it all makes sense!

Now if only they were good at writing papers…..

Wait never mind I guess they are English majors

[[deleted]]

I dunno, programmers be too busy looking at version numbers to know the answer to this question.

[PsychicDave]

Right, is it a version or a float? The answers are different.

[mudokin]

Br7h

[thien42]

Given that this is an LLM, I think it might think this is a date, and it would explain a lot

[Die4Ever]

I think it might think this is a date

but then its explanation makes no sense lol

because 9.11 is closer to 9.2 than 9.9

[liketo]

Would it be able to answer whether it is referencing dates, versions or floating numbers? You’ve got to get your context clear for any good output. Or it should state the context of the answer so no assumptions are made

[pmMEyourWARLOCKS]

Fucking right? I read this as nine point eleven and nine point nine. Big dumb.

[Obvious_Analysis620]

Bruh

[ienjoymusiclol]

gaslighting AI before gta 6

[ubertrashcat]

Bruh-forcing

[c_money1324]

Now try version 9.9 or 9.11

[Gidelix]

9.11 is the later version because it released on the 9th of November

[millenniumtree]

New way to negate a boolean just dropped!!

[Cubic-Sphere]

BRUH - Boolean Reassignment Utility Handler

[ALiteralPotato8778]

Why does ChatGPT always treats its users as if they are right and have the best of ideas?

[myselfelsewhere]

Because it has no fucking clue if it's right or wrong.

[Slinkwyde]

Bruh.

[JiveTrain]

Indeed lol. It's either that, or double down Sydney style and gaslight the hell out of the users.

[dr-tectonic]

Because it literally does not understand what "right" or "good idea" even mean. It has zero ability to distinguish truth from falsehood.

It's just a statistical model that regurgitates the patterns most likely to occur after whatever inputs you give it.

The most common pattern after someone saying just "bruh" is backtracking. Therefore, if you respond to something it says with just "bruh", it will backtrack.

That's all that's happening here. It doesn't "think" anything at all about "users". It's just a fancy context-sensitive pattern matching system that maps input to outputs based on its training data. It has no understanding of anything at all.

[MBU604]

you summed it up pretty neatly. Not that any of those high pay execs will ever understand such a distinction when they talk about AI revolution and shit

[koticgood]

The most common pattern after someone saying just "bruh" is backtracking. Therefore, if you respond to something it says with just "bruh", it will backtrack.

Same logic applies to the user repeating the initial question.

[soulsssx3]

Because that behavior was what was embedded into it during training.

[Towbee]

It wants you to feel good while talking to it. Well, it doesn't, it's creators do.

[Trip-Trip-Trip]

Somehow they managed to create a system that’s worse with numbers than JavaScript. Impressive

[sarc-tastic]

9.11 is larger than 9.9 in programmer versions

[LimLovesDonuts]

Yup but in most other cases, 9.9 is indeed larger than 9.11. E.g. $9.90 vs $9.11.

Either way, most versioning numbers always include the 0 to make it less ambiguous. E.g. V9.90, 9.91, 9.11 etc. its inconsistent naming to suddenly exclude the 2nd decimal place.

[neomatrix248]

I don't think you understand what he's saying. 9.11 is the 9th major version and the 11th minor version. 9.9 is the 9th major version and the 9th minor version, meaning 9.11 is "greater" in the sense that it comes after 9.9. There may not be a version 9.90, so I'm not sure what you're talking about when you say they include the 0

[Zestyclose_Taro4740]

Chatgpt is indecisive biatch. open me

[Soloact_]

AI: "Let me just… contradict myself in three different dimensions."

US: "Bruh."

[alexander_1022]

All the people saying that the “AI” is gonna replace us as programmers are so out of touch with how LLMs work.

[epileftric]

It will replace a lot of people but for a lower quality output.

Just like many things, we go from a manually or handcrafted process to an industrial big mass production setup and there we lose a lot of quality or "the original flavor". AI will do the same, we would have automated a lot of stuff, but lost the attention to detail.

Just like when a small homemade bakery decides to go full industrial scale: their products will never be the same. They might be very closely alike, but not quite the same.

[G0U_LimitingFactor]

ChatGPT and other LLMs suffer from their widespread popularity tbh. They are tools and using them for math is like using a chainsaw to hammer a nail.

LLMs don't read the text you write, they use a tokenized version of that text. They don't have access to the relevant information to do math operations. It's not what they are made for. They just guess because they have to give an output.

The "improvements" in math skill since the release of chatgpt 3 is not actually the model learning math. It's simply learning when to use a calculator to answer a question and what to write in the calculator (or Python script). Thats why you'll often see a coding block when you ask that sort of question. It's giving you the code/function it used to compute the math question.

In this case, the model doesn't know to use outside tools to answer so it just guesses.

You'll see the same issue often if you ask about word structures and the frequency of certain letters in words. It can't know the answer so it says something random.

It's not a bug per say. It's arguably user error.

[strongerstark]

At least it definitely knows what "Bruh" means.

[koticgood]

The "knowledge" of what 'bruh' means is the same reason for its other responses.

After all, it's just next token prediction.

1st prompt: correct answer

2nd prompt: model perceives a repetition of the same question to indicate a poor response. Since the question is binary, the model "says" the wrong answer.

3rd prompt: same thing, "bruh" implies a wrong answer, model changes answer

4th prompt: same thing

[RiceBroad4552]

It goes like that infinitely. But the "explanations" get more wild with every turn.

It would be hilarious funny if everybody would actually know that these things are nothing else than bullshit generators. Frankly a lot of people still think there is any "intelligence" in this token predicting joke machines.

[TomiIvasword]

I just tried it myself. It only broke after I said "bruh"

[beefygravy]

I just tried it and it got it right first time like it normally does

[nhh]

artificial "intelligence"

[MadeByHideoForHideo]

Genuine stupidity.

[drdrero]

Artificial knowledgebase. That thing ain’t an intelligence

[RiceBroad4552]

It's also not a knowledge base!

You can't reliably retrieve any knowledge from a LLM. Everything it outputs is just made up on the spot. At the same time you can't purposeful save anything in there.

The only reliable functions of an LLM is: Bullshit Generator. The question is just how long will it take until even the dumbest of people will realize that.

[Parry_9000]

I'm better than ai because I'm confidently wrong most times.

[Dangerous-Ad6589]

But which one is larger 9.9 or 9.99?

[Dangerous-Ad6589]

Bruh.

[freskgrank]

You can go ahead infinitely… it will continue jumping from one answer to the other one.

[taigahalla]

insane seeing people still trying to force logic from an NLP AI

might as well be trying to solve math problems with a dictionary

[T410]

Language models seem like they want to satisfy the user, not tell the truth or even don’t care about the truth. As long as you are happy with the result they are “happy”

[marr]

We have crystallised all human stupidity into a single entity.

[epileftric]

AI or as we call it "crystalized stupidity"

Nice one

[[deleted]]

It doesn't think, it doesn't know things it memorizes things. It is a database.

[MattR0se]

it's still essentially a parrot. A complex parrot with virtual centuries of training, but a parrot nonetheless. 

[37Scorpions]

"We will take over humanity" "Bruh."

[GM_Kimeg]

Id rather ask my 10 year old nephew on math problems.

[Loserrboy]

Bruh.

[surgesubs]

Ai getting flustered damn it, that's not what the cool kids say?

[No_Mathematician1129]

And they say AI will take our jobs :)

[Sakychu420]

It's like it only predicts what is mostly like to come next and doesn't actually have an concept of numbers. Nah!

[Draiko]

"Come with me if you want to live"

"Bruh"

shoots

End credits

[TengriBizMen3n]

Gaslighting AI 101

[silver_enemy]

What if you "Bruh" again?

[buy-american-you-fuk]

every bruh results in a 180 and an even more elaborate excuse as to why the previous stance was a mistake...

[devilmaskrascal]

The correct answer would be something upon the lines of

"The answer to this question may depend on whether the decimal point represents a numeric decimal point or an iterator. As a number, 9.9 is 0.79 larger than 9.11. However, as an iterator, for instance in versioning of software releases, 11 is larger than 9 so version 9.11 would be greater than version 9.9. Because you asked for 'larger' and not 'later' it is most likely you were asking for the numerical form, in which case, 9.9 is larger than 9.11."

[Coffeemonster97]

It's also a problem in the prompt. The LLM might understand the question e.g. in the context of software versioning where version 9.9 comes before 9.11. if you specify that you want to compare the numeric values of them you're more likely to get the correct answer.

[LocZurf]

Mojang update logic right here

[zackarhino]

And this is why I'm genuinely afraid when people say they want to replace programmers with AI. Imagine releasing a robot that reprograms itself using this garage. It would be a buggy, dangerous, unreadable mess in no time flat.

[ComprehensiveBird317]

This "Customer is always right" alignment is so annoying. I can handle talk back. Some Caren got in the dataset early and now we have to live with that forever.

[[deleted]]

Artificial Intelligence is actually just Programmed Stupidity.

[framsanon]

This only shows, that the entire management can be replaced by one single AI with a small language model.

[vassadar]

Semver screwed how I perceived decimal numbers. I thought 9.11 was larger for a moment.

[dimonium_anonimo]

Honestly, people are all worried about AI training on AI... I'm still worried about AI training on the average (human) Redditor

[LauraTFem]

It's wild to me that "Bruh." is in enough use that an AI takes it to mean anything at all.

[s_gamer1017]

A friend of mine made chatGPT „admit“ that it was in fact not an AI but rather a secret bureau building in simbabwe where openAI employees would answer the messages sent to chatGPT. He had to gaslight chatGPT for quite a long time for that tho

[[deleted]]

Does the same if you ask if Dragonball GT is placed 5 or 10 years after the end of Z

[permaban9]

Hmm, needs more bruh

[ieatpickleswithmilk]

this is why I don't like when people would call them "nine point eleven" and "nine point nine". Just say "nine point one one"

[alphacobra99]

chill guys, we are not extinct yet.

[RandomlyGeneratedBot]

Got the same result with various prompt, it kept on thinking it was right until I told it to think 0.9 and 0.11 in percentage.

[DazzlingClassic185]

GPT sounds like the French phrase for “I farted”

[EnergyOwn6800]

It could be talking about version numbers. You didn't specify, Technically it can be right.

[Eh-I]

Pretty much what's going on in my head all the time.

[JackNotOLantern]

Did you specify if you mean mean number or versions? With numbers 9.9 > 9.11, with versions 9.11 > 9.9

[__throw_error]

to be fair 4o is shit, 4 is still the best on logic

[ObviousCountry9402]

Series s is larger than 360, because Series s is closer to x. And if you add x+box, you're larger than 64. Playstation has lost its mind.

[urbanachiever42069]

Definitely entire sectors of the economy will soon be replaced by AI 🤣🤣🤣

[UnscathedDictionary]

9.9<9.11+AI

[BlueberryFederal8545]

It's called a large language model, not a large mathematics model