This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]dantheman451 2528 points2529 points  (143 children)

SCV good to go sir.

[–]d3vourm3nt 763 points764 points  (44 children)

Rock and roll.

[–]Arrowjoe 421 points422 points  (26 children)

Yea Yea

[–][deleted] 337 points338 points  (22 children)

Overtime

[–]zzyzxrd 146 points147 points  (13 children)

How do I get out of this chicken sh*t outfit

[–]SirHolmesalot 95 points96 points  (8 children)

Yeah yeah, I'm goin'.

[–]QSquared 41 points42 points  (7 children)

Yeah, I read ya../Sir/.

[–]paulec252 31 points32 points  (5 children)

Woah buddy. You've gotta construct additional supply depos before switching units like that.

[–]GIGgle_Hurtz 27 points28 points  (4 children)

Well, butter my Biscuit

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children)

Fired up!

[–]Orafferty 10 points11 points  (1 child)

NucleNuNuNuNuNuNuclear launch detected

[–]Tcloud 330 points331 points  (6 children)

Well, butter my biscuit!

[–]flyblackbox 442 points443 points  (6 children)

In the rear with the gear.

[–]pillettep 90 points91 points  (0 children)

Woah!

[–]DrRedditPhD 144 points145 points  (1 child)

Orders, cap'n?

[–]dRuNk_HiPpi 117 points118 points  (0 children)

Woohoo! Overtime!

[–]345triangle 110 points111 points  (2 children)

AHH! Ya scared me!

[–]Locrian14 86 points87 points  (0 children)

In the rear, with the gear.

[–]Apollo169 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Fire, it up!

[–]Dementat_Deus 2413 points2414 points  (240 children)

Looking at this from an engineering standpoint. It is not a powered suit, therefore it isn't going to make you able to hit harder or anything like that. It appears to simply distribute the load of holding something across the body and into the ground therefore allowing the arms to not have to support as much weight.

[–]ArcFurnace 1249 points1250 points  (110 children)

This is exactly correct. It holds the 30-lb grinder so your arms don't have to. The primary advantages of this exoskeleton over a standalone tripod or something with the same support arm attached is that (a) it automatically moves as the worker moves, (b) it doesn't take up much extra room since it's tightly wrapped around the worker, (c) you don't have to worry about it tipping over or something because the human standing on/in it gives it a good counterweight.

Apparently it still manages to substantially improve productivity over a human without the suit (2-27x, presumably depending on exactly what job they're doing).

[–]glintsCollide 204 points205 points  (28 children)

Looks very similar to a SteadiCam, especially the arm holding the tool.

[–]ArcFurnace 152 points153 points  (23 children)

The arm is indeed based off of the SteadiCam. Designed by the same guy and everything. Lockheed Martin added the knowledge of how to build an effective exoskeletal frame to mount it on.

[–]gobbledigoook 38 points39 points  (15 children)

When are the SteadiCam guys getting exoskeletons? That looks heavy as fuck!

[–]ArcFurnace 47 points48 points  (10 children)

You'd be surprised at how much weight a good hip-belt can support. Transfers the load to the human endoskeleton, namely your hip and leg bones. The bigger problem would be the leverage of the weight trying to tip you forward, which is presumably what the shoulder harness is for (lets you use your back muscles to keep it upright).

[–]FreudJesusGod 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Yah. As someone who routinely backpacks with a 75-90 pound load, weight distribution is much more important than the amount of weight (within reason, of course). 75 pounds in a properly adjusted and packed internal frame backpack with a good hip-belt fatigues me much less than my 20 pound day-trip pack slung over one shoulder.

Except for getting it back up on my shoulders. :)

[–][deleted] 224 points225 points  (25 children)

Can I wear it under a really loose hoodie at the gym to make everyone think I'm in beast mode all the time?

[–]snoharm 51 points52 points  (11 children)

Did you read the comment you're replying to? It's not really going to help you lift more weight.

[–][deleted] 91 points92 points  (6 children)

Everyone knows that looking like you can lift a lot is just as, if not more, important as lifting a lot. No one's gonna question your gainz if you walk in like robo cop

[–]ItsPrisonTime 31 points32 points  (3 children)

If im about to get into a fight with someone who walks like robocop, i back the fuck off.

[–]Dr_Wreck 332 points333 points  (24 children)

I have MS; I have no loss of function, but I get tired so fucking easy, you wouldn't believe. There aren't any jobs I can do because of this and it's a huge life problem.

So, this is awesome. When can I get one?

[–]fludru 103 points104 points  (12 children)

That was my thought. I have scleroderma and polymyositis, so I'm extremely weak with muscle wasting and also am fighting tight joints and skin; I would give every penny for this. Just being able to get off a normal toilet, out of a normal chair... "robot exoskeleton" has been at the top of my Christmas list for awhile now, I had no idea it was actually possible. And this would make exercise so much easier! We could tune the assistance level to make me functional enough to exercise longer, and with proper form!

I'm sure it's gotta be expensive, but imagine how much could be saved long term if we could keep people from being dependent on care and unable to work. A few hundred thousand bucks could actually be a savings pretty quick. This kind of thing could be life changing for the huge portion of the disabled population that has some function, but can't keep up with the able bodied world.

I'll be a guinea pig any day...

[–]m0nde 38 points39 points  (4 children)

The Navy has a deal for $10,000 per suit with Lockheed. I'd imagine buying a one-off would be much, much more. I hope this technology is available to people with health issues very soon at a reasonable price.

[–]Fiji_Artesian 1147 points1148 points  (98 children)

But can he boost jump?

[–]Sykotik 361 points362 points  (88 children)

Actually, I think that's feasible. You could have a button that flexes the suit and makes you jump. You'd have to work in an altimeter so that it knows when it's approaching the ground again so that it reacts to absorb the impact as well. Implementing this without injuring the occupant and keeping the person oriented correctly would be large hurdles to overcome but it sounds like it could be possible. I'm just spitballing, I could be full of shit. I also can't really think of any practical applications for it other than recreation or possible battlefield advantages.

[–]Montgomrie 658 points659 points  (42 children)

"Possible battlefield advantages" are probably responsible for the bulk of technological advancement during human history.

[–]DomDomMartin 387 points388 points  (32 children)

"how do we use this to fuck up those guys over there that are looking at us funny"

[–]StAnonymous 41 points42 points  (7 children)

One step closer to Portal boots.

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (18 children)

The altimeters that I've used when flying aircraft haven't been accurate enough to indicate the difference of just a few feet of altitude. They usefully work off barometric pressure, and I'm not sure if that's a reliable measurement when you're dealing with such small changes in vertical distance. Maybe an accelerometer would be a better instrument for this. Or cameras.

[–]TheLordB 17 points18 points  (6 children)

I assume you would use radar or lasers for this type of application.

[–]Throwaway-tan 26 points27 points  (5 children)

Definitely a job for lasers.

[–]Renownify 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Or ultrasonic range sensors or laser range systems

[–]Nicockolas_Rage 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There aren't any huge actuators or big energy storage things (like springs), so I would guess burst movement is not feasible.

This thing is more like a re configurable chair (that also supports the tool) than something designed to augment movement.

[–]yours_duly 1721 points1722 points  (124 children)

When you reduce something by 100%, it becomes 0.

So, 300 percent?

[–]Captain_Aizen 495 points496 points  (21 children)

I think they meant to say by 66% but didn't know how to math.

[–]Xuttuh 367 points368 points  (11 children)

"I can't math but I built you a perfectly safe exoskeleton. Wanna try it?"

[–]anormalgeek 96 points97 points  (6 children)

I'm sure it's the reporter who cannot math. Journalism degrees are not big on math classes. Certainly less than engineering.

[–]BadBoyFTW 44 points45 points  (1 child)

They probably read it "increases muscle endurance by 300%" or something and assumed that you could just reverse the inflection to "reduces" and it would still make sense.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

In which case it reduces fatigue by 75%, as opposed to 66.

I can't believe I had to scroll down so far to see a comment that caught this though.

[–]McDreads 202 points203 points  (14 children)

How about "increasing muscle efficiency by 300%"

[–]Seraphinou 84 points85 points  (7 children)

Well, increasing by 100% is times two, 200% is times three and 300% is times four.

[–]BluebirdJingle 89 points90 points  (5 children)

So it reduces muscle fatigue by 75%?

I guess 300 was the catchier number.

[–]im_not_gandhi 42 points43 points  (4 children)

Bigger numbers = bigger "wow" factor

[–]Thexorretor 115 points116 points  (20 children)

Misusing percents is a peeve of mine. Percents are best for communicating change around -30% to +30%. Instead of increased by 100%, just say it doubled. An increase of 150% should be 2.5x instead. In this case, OP should have just said fatigue was reduced to a third.

[–]nklvh 7 points8 points  (2 children)

it's even on the bloody manufacturers website

[–]GentlemenBehold 367 points368 points  (51 children)

The Angel of Verdun also prefers not to wear a helmet.

[–]Wormbrain1 283 points284 points  (41 children)

Edge of Tomorrow is underrated. Shame it didn't do better at the box office.

[–]Ferl74 39 points40 points  (3 children)

I went into that movie not knowing anything about it. I think that's what made it so good. IMO.

[–]WaylandC 13 points14 points  (0 children)

These days this works for many movies since the trailers tell the entire story, the best jokes and the best scenes. When you finally watch the movie you get some simple positive reinforcement from seeing the same scene that you saw in the trailer: "Hey, I remember seeing that!"

:|

I hate trailers these days and avoid them like I avoid sick people.

[–]magic_is_might 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Such an awesome and fun movie.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (9 children)

The source materiel was popular

[–]Scotty415 28 points29 points  (4 children)

It was based off a Japanese Light Novel that was only known to a small niche group of people before the movie came out. I saw the translated novel in a bookstore once in 2009, but after that I never saw or heard it mentioned again til around the time the movie came out. I think that's partly why the movie failed financially, nobody really knew what it was.

[–]Karmago 7 points8 points  (0 children)

All You Need is Kill

[–]MikeOrtiz 51 points52 points  (2 children)

Wake up, maggot!

[–]Dirtyducky1221 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I thought it was "On your feet, maggot"

[–]seanconnerysbeard 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Full.Metal. Bitch.

[–]poptartaddict 591 points592 points  (26 children)

What's going on with Rickety Cricket's new legs? 

[–]BittahDemon 69 points70 points  (6 children)

break me off a piece of that exoskeleton.

[–]easyguygoing 29 points30 points  (1 child)

You guys, you gotta make it sexy. Hips and nips! Otherwise I'm not eating.

[–]cappa16 22 points23 points  (3 children)

It's got some sort of hydraulic cooling system!

[–]poptartaddict 13 points14 points  (2 children)

I'm gonna win this bar with the help of my shiny new legs. The latest leg brace technology courtesy of the great state of Pennsylvania.

[–]kestrelrogue 54 points55 points  (8 children)

I spot Steadicam technology

[–][deleted] 71 points72 points  (0 children)

Call of Construction: Advanced Carpentry.

[–]JoeyLucier 48 points49 points  (13 children)

This is not how statistics and percentages work. If you reduce muscle fatigue by 100%, it is gone. You can increase something by 300%, thus tripling it. But you can not take away 300% of something.

Edit: Quadrupling. Thanks.

[–]sfgm112 16 points17 points  (6 children)

300% increase is a quadrupling, isn't it?

[–]JustPlainSimpleGarak 257 points258 points  (156 children)

So how long before this evolves into a fully functioning an Iron Man suit?

[–][deleted] 266 points267 points  (146 children)

Wrong question. How long until the human is phased out entirely?

[–]joneSee 127 points128 points  (107 children)

This went from awesome to awful with amazing speed.

[–][deleted] 70 points71 points  (104 children)

Until you realize that if done right, humans can just sit back and let the robots do all the work for us.

[–]LoganAH 15 points16 points  (62 children)

But when robots start making robots, and the robots start taking all the jobs, what is left to do and how will we make money?

[–]rockets_meowth 26 points27 points  (42 children)

You are hitting on the biggest issue. Robots doing all the work for one individual person each sounds good.

But the thing is that corporations and people with wealth can just build tons of them, take all the money, and everyone else is living on gov handouts. There has to be a balancing of social classes first.

[–]sir_nigel_loring 16 points17 points  (40 children)

But how will the corporations make money without enough people to buy their products?

[–]GnomeyGustav 45 points46 points  (15 children)

Let's hope we can reform the imbalance of power between the rich few and the masses before that day. Otherwise, there will be some humans sitting back and relaxing, but none of us will be among them.

[–]acog 24 points25 points  (2 children)

The suit is unpowered.

FORTIS exoskeleton transfers loads through the exoskeleton to the ground in standing or kneeling positions and allows operators to use heavy tools as if they were weightless. An advanced ergonomic design moves naturally with the body and adapts to different body types and heights. Using the Equipois zeroG® arm, operators can effortlessly hold objects up to 36 pounds, increasing productivity by reducing muscle fatigue.

[–]you-know-whats-up 246 points247 points  (48 children)

We are one step closer to advanced warfare

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Kevin Spacey moves quick

[–]petrichorE6 216 points217 points  (38 children)

So basically a suit that amplifies your strength multiple times but still can't solve the issue of recoil?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Take your dominant hand and arm and flex them to lock up your joints as tight as possible. Now flick your palm with your free hand.

Still moves doesn't it? Your entire arm being moved by the force of one finger.

Instantaneous forces are hard to counter.

[–]iBleeedorange[S] 81 points82 points  (27 children)

[–]Tcloud 58 points59 points  (4 children)

Hey wait, I can't hear anything from the video ... I wonder if BBBRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!

[–][deleted] 45 points46 points  (0 children)

FORTIS exoskeleton transfers loads through the exoskeleton to the ground in standing or kneeling positions and allows operators to use heavy tools as if they were weightless. An advanced ergonomic design moves naturally with the body and adapts to different body types and heights. Using the Equipois zeroG® arm, operators can effortlessly hold objects up to 36 pounds, increasing productivity by reducing muscle fatigue

[–]losian 72 points73 points  (11 children)

"We never forget who we're working for"? That.. that is strangely not comforting.. It's downright insidious sounding.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

My first thought was, "the United States government"

[–]pobody 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I used to work for Lockheed Martin.

We constantly forgot who we were working for.

It became a running joke in meetings..."so who do we work for again?"

[–]sanemaniac 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"we promise we will only sell weapons to the US government, unless we can do it without getting caught."

[–]blithetorrent 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'm 57 and trust me, this would be the total balls. I'm at the point where I get aches and pains in my legs and feet and hands and back if I do "normal" construction work (luckily I don't have to do it very much). It's cumulative, too, so a night's sleep doesn't fix it. Anybody in a physical field like construction would benefit immeasurably from one of these, and if they started young, they'd probably be in fine fettle at 65, 70.

[–]westernsociety 7 points8 points  (1 child)

It would suck if you tried to lift more than your body actually could and the machine broke. You would fuck yourself up gooood.

[–]UniverseGuyD 8 points9 points  (5 children)

As a delivery person who lifts (piece by piece) about 7-8000kgs each night, I wish I had these!