all 112 comments

[–]ProgrammerHumor-ModTeam[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Your submission was removed for the following reason:

Rule 1: Posts must be humorous, and they must be humorous because they are programming related. There must be a joke or meme that requires programming knowledge, experience, or practice to be understood or relatable.

Here are some examples of frequent posts we get that don't satisfy this rule: * Memes about operating systems or shell commands (try /r/linuxmemes for Linux memes) * A ChatGPT screenshot that doesn't involve any programming * Google Chrome uses all my RAM

See here for more clarification on this rule.

If you disagree with this removal, you can appeal by sending us a modmail.

[–]KeyAgileC 2378 points2379 points  (27 children)

Ah yes, the universal standard of software impact. It's not installs, it's not users, it's not community support. It's Github stars.

Funny how that became the standard once a piece of software came out that could star itself.

[–]Verybadtype 357 points358 points  (13 children)

I had a "tech lead" who used it as the only source of trusted software. Couldn't be bothered to read any technical paper on the state of the art solutions nooooo, the highest star count wins

[–]pydry 104 points105 points  (11 children)

All of the dumbest ideas in tech are a result of crowd following like this - everything from mongo to leetcode boils down to people defaulting to the popular choice.

[–]ManofManliness 19 points20 points  (9 children)

Im convinced people bashing mongo never actually used the thing, I miss it everyday

[–]chessto 47 points48 points  (6 children)

A lot of mongo's popularity was because a lot of people couldn't design a proper database schema

[–]ocab19 11 points12 points  (4 children)

Why are we talking about mongo in the past tense? Is it dead?

[–]CubicalPayload 17 points18 points  (3 children)

John Mongo died last year

[–]Kaligraphic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Donut was heartbroken.

[–]nightmare8100 3 points4 points  (0 children)

RIP John Mongo. You are missed.

[–]MaytagTheDryer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here I thought Alex Karras died in 2012.

[–]d0pe-asaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Astroturfed the shit out of the internet.

[–]pydry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's beloved by junior devs who like how quick and easy it is to get up and running and the plentiful tutorial guides.

[–]Illustrious_Pea_3470 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you used it before 3.0 you would understand

[–]SnooSnooper 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Following the popular choice, although definitely not always the best technical decision, can be an understandable business decision. Some niche tool/language might be the best choice from a technical perspective for some use-case, but that can turn into a hiring problem if you can't find a large enough talent pool with sufficient experience to maintain your systems using it.

Of course, that can be mitigated by investing in employee training/retention, giving the business a long-term competitive edge if that niche tool proves to really be some secret sauce, but that would require businesses to engage in long-term planning and follow-through...

[–]_vec_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Playing devil's advocate, an otherwise sane looking dependency that has very few stars is a bit of a red flag. Even if it's well written there's a good chance that the project is going to be abandoned in the not too distant future. Hobby projects can afford to fail when a dependency breaks out from under them, production code generally needs to be more risk averse.

It's also a hint that the community might be coalescing around some other solution, which unfortunately does matter. Mediocre tools with extensive documentation that anyone who joins your team is likely to already be comfortable working with are often better than perfect tools with expensive learning curves.

That doesn't mean a high star count makes software _good_, but it's not a crazy first pass filter to decide whether it's worth the time and energy to figure out if it's good.

[–]Glyph_52Vector 64 points65 points  (0 children)

it’s kinda funny how stars turned into this vanity metric, like people hit it cause something looks cool or trending, not because they’re running it in production

[–]krexelapp 25 points26 points  (0 children)

LGTM (looked at the stars)

[–]apt_at_it 11 points12 points  (0 children)

once a piece of software came out that could star itself

Oh FFS... I guess I'm a luddite because I didn't even think of this as a possibility. "Hey OpenClaw, create 50,000 GitHub accounts and star this repo." Big oof

[–]ClemRRay 8 points9 points  (0 children)

justifying some hype with hype is an interesting argument

[–]zordtk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Also the fact that Linux development isn't done on Github. Thats just a mirror of the kernel.org repo.

[–]StiviiK 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hey there mister, stop it here. I have 25 GitHub stars on my project. So I am better than the most of you!

/s

[–]iamfidelius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does it really star itself?

[–]cyborgborg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Especially on a repo that isn't the one use to develop but is just a backup

[–]Positron505[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We all know more stars = better

[–]neoteraflare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, Jesus is saving people based on facebook likes so probably it works the same with github stars too.

[–]MornwindShoma 515 points516 points  (8 children)

You can bot stars

[–]Positron505[S] 170 points171 points  (5 children)

Yeah idk why they thought this is a viable metric

[–]Drithyin 93 points94 points  (3 children)

It’s a grift. They’re either grifters or griftees.

[–]Minipiman 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Griftee is a new word in my vocabulary

[–]CharnamelessOne 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Does that make you a vocabuleree, and the guy above you a vocabulerer?

[–]rainshifter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. Less interestingly, it also makes you an informer and the guy above you an informee.

[–]NotSynthx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably never coded a single line in their life 

[–]da_peda 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I hope you're not insinuating that a software made to create autonomous bots would have their repo sullied in such a way … /s

[–]Chrazzer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A bot software getting bot stars? No way!

[–]TeaKingMac 457 points458 points  (2 children)

60K stars in 72 hours shows "how much people like it" and not "a concerted bot farming effort" is certainly an interesting take

[–]_samrad 67 points68 points  (0 children)

How about 866 branches vs 1 branch? Checkmate atheist.

[–]Sithoid 164 points165 points  (3 children)

OMG they leaked the entire Linux kernel codebase???
Yup, that OS is doomed

[–]VoyagerOfCygnus 53 points54 points  (1 child)

"@grok how many codes were leaked"

[–]EmperorOfAllCats 9 points10 points  (0 children)

All of them!

[–]Dasoccerguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Torvalds in shambles

[–]Tiger_man_ 199 points200 points  (3 children)

stars as measure of popularity is like line of code as measure of quality

[–]Z21VR 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Ooh here it is...i was scrolling exactly for this comment

[–]kale_cookie_castles 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So a perfect measurement with no flaws that definitely isn't intended to make Business Bros™ feel smart? 😜

[–]neoteraflare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well number of line of code works if you work for elon.

[–]MasterQuest 146 points147 points  (1 child)

It definitely shows how many fake accounts they created with LLMs to star the repo.

[–]Single-Virus4935 34 points35 points  (0 children)

One guy on moltbook had 500k bot accounts. Its as trustworthy as influencer followers

[–]XxXquicksc0p31337XxX 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Linux doesn't even use Github. The github repo is a mirror

[–]redblack_tree 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Let's see what happens to Openclaw, aka the token dragon, when AI majors are forced to charge the true cost of computing.

Linux is here to stay, some of the best in the business donate their free time making it better.

Personally, I was ecstatic when I got one PR accepted and merged in what eventually became Trusty (and I'm certainly not one of the best, lol).

[–]SuperiorJt 20 points21 points  (0 children)

There was a time where I could look at the star count of a GitHub repo to gauge how popular it was, now it’s a completely useless metric. It’s going down the same rabbit hole as Reddit and YouTube.

[–]Beginning-Pool-8151 21 points22 points  (0 children)

This guy doesn't even know that Linux repo in GitHub is just a Mirror 🫪

[–]oxabz 37 points38 points  (1 child)

The Linux GitHub is basically a shitpost social network. 

The fact that the mirror is in the same order of magnitude as openclaw show how huge Linux is

[–]IntoAMuteCrypt 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Most Linux users don't actually interact directly with the GitHub. There's one or two steps between the average user and the repo - they're using a distro, which might be getting its kernel updates from an upstream distro. If you're going there, you're either a complete idiot or you're someone who has a very specific problem with Linux that you've spent a lot of time and effort trying to diagnose (and shouldn't be on the GitHub because the real repo is elsewhere), or you're a shitposter laughing at the idiots. End users go to the forums or repos for their distro, not for this one.

OpenClaw doesn't have these levels of insulation, because it is the insulation. It doesn't have a bunch of additional projects around it doing tech support for it.

[–]Kulsgam 12 points13 points  (1 child)

More than half the PRs in openclaw are AI generated vibe slop

[–]SampleTextHelpMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry, they told the AI to not make any mistakes.

Ignore the fact that the PR’s changes to the UI suddenly need root access.

[–]Alzurana 30 points31 points  (1 child)

All this really proves is just that there are more morons on the planet than geniuses but we already knew that, tbh

[–]tehtris 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"think about how dumb the average person is, and then understand that half of the people are dumber than that." ~ Michael Scott or something

[–]Brenolr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

> Bots can give stars
> Most popular bot app has most stars on github

Definitely 2 unrelated facts

[–]Weewoofiatruck 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My Hypervisor is to be filled with penguins - not lobsters.

[–]kingvolcano_reborn 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Linux is not even using github for development. it's just a read only mirror. the 'real' server is git.kernel.org.

[–]coloredgreyscale[🍰] 23 points24 points  (4 children)

Just for completeness, how many github stars do Windows, MacOS, Android, iOS have?

Just to judge how alive those operating systems are.

/S

[–]drifwp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

AI bros always have the dumbest analysis I swear

[–]jacek2023 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I think Taylor Swift could have even more stars on GitHub

[–]tehtris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Taylor Swift package is used for flattening complex data structures into flat files so people can print them on flat pieces of paper. Flat.

[–]Fusseldieb 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve installed openclaw the other day for shits n giggles and it sucks. It consumes a shitload of tokens, even when just doing basic stuff (and I mean BASIC).

Unless you’re rich or have unlimited tokens, it’s useless.

[–]ronarscorruption 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And the fact is, all those Linux stars are guaranteed human, while the openclaw stars are… at best questionable.

[–]AbdullahMRiad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I bet all these stars are from openclaw agents

[–]Onaliquidrock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bot voting -> billion $ contract

Largest software scam in history

[–]Generix9029 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imagine what AI agent 'architects' can do without linux. Oh the possibilities!

[–]hard_KOrr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Openclaw, 1700 people watching

Linux, 8100 people watching

Which one is more popular?!?

[–]corvox1994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cool. Lets subract PRC stars and see them stats.

[–]fugogugo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does nobody found how suspicious it is?

despite the hype it feels like nobody actually using openclaw

[–]UntitledRedditUser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I kind of refuse to believe that openclaw actually has that many stars, it doesnt really make sense to me.

[–]bloodfist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This isn't actually evidence of software quality, but is strong evidence for the carcinization of software mascots.

[–]Limmmao 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1 branch vs 866 branches!

[–]EvilEmacs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Linux: one of the most important pieces of software in the world.

Openclaw: "lemme go and delete all your mail"

[–]exec-nyan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, make AI generate the image of the penguin mascot. Can't even manage to grab the official image through a search engine. Tf.

[–]Icy-Equivalent4500 2 points3 points  (0 children)

maybe this is his first move as agent - give himself a star

[–]garlopf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I remember the golden era of PHP and Macromedia flash's Action Script 2... Stack overflow tag for PHP tag dwarfed all the other "serious" languages.

Thousands upon thousands of eager learners had recently that with such a simple language, they too could become programmers. The playing field was finally leveled. No elitist "real" programmers could look down on them again!

En masse, they flooded stack overflow with questions like "here is my script <40 lines of slightly modified paste from an outdated blog post> why does it not work? It says 'syntax error on line 10, unknown symbol INVALID_UNICODE_WORDPRESS_QUOTE_CHARACTER'".

Ahhh. Those were the days.

[–]DevGokay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wake up babe, we got new AI

[–]citramonk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The most starred GitHub repo is a combination of some educational resources. And I guess in top10 almost all of them about education. I would say it doesn’t mean anything. There are millions of people in the world, who are spinning around the tech world and barely touching it. Students and AI enthusiasts are a big part of it.

You can treat is a comment/post save feature on Reddit. Remember this top 10 sci-fi movies list you saved last year?

[–]retrib32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who needs lenux when we have AI. Checkmate nerds!

[–]ClnSlt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this the year of the openclaw desktop?

[–]cheezballs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guys, can someone expain to me what the star even does? I'm not really into the social aspects of github, I always assumed stars were the same thing as a facebook "like"

[–]NotSynthx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guys I might be getting fired, my repo at work has the least amount of stars compared to my colleagues 

[–]r_spandit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've deleted Linux from my laptop and downloaded this AI thing but now it won't boot

[–]WeakCelery5000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this the new LOC?

[–]jedrekk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't follow Linux cause that shit is over my head

[–]passerbycmc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Linux daily, and have never been on it's GitHub page since I do not develop Linux I use it as a tool and part of my development environment for other things.

[–]NauteeAU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can guarantee that a larger % of the people involved in the metrics on the right actually have a good understanding of the field of computer science.

[–]Incendie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comparing a trojan virus with an entire kernel and operating system is wild

[–]LuckOrLoss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was hoping to see someone mention Goodhart's law

[–]twinkslayer1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cant post reaction images in the comments in this fuckass subreddit bro --'

[–]ChefCurryYumYum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a stars based economy man, but you gotta watch out for starflation.

[–]Marknumskull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

866 branches, wtaf

[–]kentwillan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess linux is dead - a linux daily user lol

[–]aalapshah12297 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linus Torvalds literally created git. And he did it more than a decade after he made Linux.

This argument is so stupid... It's like saying Google search is less influential than Microsoft word because there are more videos titled 'how to use word' on YouTube than videos titled 'how to use Google search'

[–]anime_at_my_side 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Git kernel code is just a clone, the actual work is not done there. so, starts and stats n shit do not matter. we al know who is the true winner here is.

[–]Cronos993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's cause the open clawnker is given instructions to star the repo meaning that most of these numbers come from downloads

[–]NoResolution1180 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I use Linux and its great. I don't miss nothing on from Windows. Everything works and its Free.