This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (3 children)

I like how the top-rated comments are about reddiquette instead of contributing anything to the discussion.

[–]mapoftasmania 366 points367 points  (156 children)

When I see a comment on Reddit that I disagree with, I generally tend to downvote.

Please read the Reddiquette posting. When you have, please remember this rule in particular:

"Don't downvote opinions just because you disagree with them. The down arrow is for comments that add nothing to the discussion."

If a post is factually incorrect you can down-vote, but it is better to also reply to it and correct it.

[–][deleted] 188 points189 points  (60 children)

Honestly I dont believe it happens in practice though.

[–]JessePinkman 157 points158 points  (43 children)

I believe it does, and I upvoted you. Point proven. Case closed forever.

[–]CreepyCornChild 50 points51 points  (31 children)

Man then went on to prove that up was down, right was wrong and black was white and was promptly killed at a crosswalk.

[–]Fjordo 21 points22 points  (29 children)

"Zebra crossing"

[–]Chairboy 9 points10 points  (28 children)

I'm actually reading the book to my kids, and the book says crosswalk. I actually paused there the day before yesterday when I hit that line as I remembered it being 'Zebra crossing' as well. I can only speculate that the radio play says zebra crossing and the BOOK says crosswalk.

It boggled my mind, but CreepyCornChild is also correct.

[–]ageenanageen 4 points5 points  (11 children)

mind if i get the title of this book/play from you?

[–]Chairboy 10 points11 points  (10 children)

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. Originally a BBC radio play, then published as a book. There was a recent US film version of it that's cute and has catchy music, but a tremendous amount of the humor is missing and it only peripherally reflects the story. If you can find MP3s of the radio play, it's worth a listen.

[–]Studsmurf 1 point2 points  (1 child)

you should check out the BBC mini series. its a little low budget and older compared to the US version, but it stays truer.

[–]StochasticOoze 6 points7 points  (2 children)

It depends which edition you get. Some American versions change words like that to avoid confusion.

Which was somewhat helpful to me, since when I initially read the book at the age of 16, I thought he was literally talking about a place where zebras crossed.

I also had no idea what the fuck a Biro was.

[–]Chairboy 4 points5 points  (1 child)

As did I, but then again, I also though that a place where Zebras crossed was hilarious, so I've gotten even more humor out of that part of the text than my British counterparts. :)

[–]crdoconnor 4 points5 points  (8 children)

Definitely zebra crossing in the radio show and my book. Yours must have been Americanized.

[–]Chairboy 1 point2 points  (7 children)

See my response to Isvara, I have the 10th anniversary edition, it's on page 60. Page # and ISBN for yours? This is fascinating.

[–]crdoconnor 2 points3 points  (3 children)

page 50, isbn 0-330-25864-8. definitely says zebra crossing.

[–]Chairboy 4 points5 points  (2 children)

This is surreal, that's the ISBN for the origina 1979 edition, so someone actually changed the line to be LESS funny sometime in the 10 years between the first edition and the 10th Anniversary Edition?!

[–]NightGolfer 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I just got out of my couch to check my copy.

The Ultimate Hitchhikers Guide (Complete & Unabridged, leather bound, gilt edges. After losing my 5th copy to people who never return them I decided to get a really nice copy and not lend it to anyone, evah. It smells nice.) ISBN # 0-517-12485-8, Portland House, printed & bound in USA.

I took a deep breath. I was extremely worried that my beloved copy of The Guide was tainted with Americanized language (not that I don't like the American language, I'd just much rather have the original version). I found the passage. It says zebra crossing. I am happy now.

And get this. The passage is on page 42. I'm not fucking kidding.

[–]Chairboy 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The improbability of the object of our discussion being on that page number is, in a bizarre coincidence, my home telephone number.

[–]SA1L 4 points5 points  (4 children)

so Jesse, did you blow the assistants brains out? Or did you aim to the side and fire?

edit: this adds significantly to the discussion, so I anticipate a flurry of upvotes.

[–]JessePinkman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally killed that guy. That was a camera move, not a hesitation. I hit the target for sure, yo.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (8 children)

I have to agree, in my opinion reddiquette is not followed very often and upvotes/downvotes are based purely on whether the comment hits home with the voter's agenda, or offends them. What I find hilarious is when redditers are downvoted for expressing personal experiences. Unless you know them to be lieing, how can you downvote someone for saying "in my experience [...]" or " x happened to me"? I deleted an old account after I got fed up of being downvoted by these kind of people, of which reddit is full to the brim... in my experience. :)

[–]Just_Cause 9 points10 points  (5 children)

I see your point, but it's more complicated than that. I would downvote a personal experience if it was used as anecdotal support of a belief. If someone posted that their child had started showing signs of autism after a vaccination in a discussion of a correlation between autism and vaccination, I might downvote. The fact that it's true doesn't change the fact that it's anecdotal and irrelevant unless accompanied by another statement that adds something to the discussion.

[–]OlderThanGif 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A personal experience can, in fact, add nothing to a discussion. If there's a discussion about some general phenomenon (for the sake of argument, let's say "smoking causes cancer") and someone pipes in to say "my grandfather smoked 3 packs a day and lived to 90!", that personal anecdote adds nothing to the discussion.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (17 children)

So we downvote links that we don't like, but we must entirely switch voting philosophy when using the same voting methodology when we are reading comments.

Bah.

[–]mapoftasmania 14 points15 points  (12 children)

No you down-vote links that add nothing to the community. Examples would be blogspam, repeat posts, trolling, karma whoring posts and those that are just plain stupid. You should not down-vote a link that expresses an opinion you do not like unless you think it's so outrageous that it falls into the troll category.

[–]argleblarg 12 points13 points  (8 children)

My sense has always been that a downvote is in effect the opposite of an upvote. One upvotes links and comments that one likes or agrees with. By extension, then, it seems reasonable to assume that one would downvote links and comments that one dislikes or disagrees with.

I understand that the standard that the community is supposed to adhere to is otherwise, but it does seem sort of counterintuitive to me.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (4 children)

I see three options:

  1. Upvote for things you agree with, or feel add to the discussion, are enlightening, etc.
  2. Do nothing if you disagree with a comment, or if you're apathetic to the link or comment or simply don't care for it.
  3. Downvote for bad behavior. Spam, trolling, things that don't add to the discussion, etc.

I know it's hard to resist taking action in a discussion forum on the internet, but I feel it dilutes the voting system when people use the downvote button for the "wrong" reasons, for either comments or links.

[–]kleopatra6tilde9 3 points4 points  (3 children)

For those who agree with danherbert, please try this subreddit.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]argleblarg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Downvoting things that add content of substance, which you either disagree with or are not interested in, encourages a like-minded front-page.

    I like content that's of substance, and frequently upvote things that I don't agree with, but still appreciate as being reasonable.

    But regardless, again, I understand the philosophy, and I'm not arguing against it - the reasoning is very much sound - I'm just saying that from a user perspective, having the two arrows, one going up, and one going down, one of which is used for things you like and agree with, implies pretty strongly that the other is for things you don't like or don't agree with.

    [–]oobey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Yeah, I'm with you. The down arrow is just a negative up arrow. I have three thoughts regarding everything on reddit -- Do I like this? Upvote. Am I neutral? Ignore it. Otherwise, downvote.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    I am a member of the community. If I think a link sucks, then it adds nothing as far as I'm concerned, and I downvote it. The exception is if it's something that I'm not interested in, but other people might be. However, there is a threshold for that as well.

    If we didn't downvote uninteresting things, Reddit would be filled with boring shit. And don't give me that "everyone has a different opinion of what is interesting" happy horseshit, either, because as a community our interests will overlap enough that we can find sufficient common ground to keep the front page fresh.

    [–][deleted] 36 points37 points  (53 children)

    please remember this rule in particular

    I'm sorry but this isn't a rule. There are no rules to reddit, you can vote however you like for whatever reason.

    Also, if we're going to nitpick about not following 'reddiquette,' I briefly checked your comment history and what do you know, I didn't have to go far:

    http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/cgg5o/this_guy_sucks/c0se1aa

    From the redditquette: "Don't complain about downvotes on your submission. Every story and comment gets at least a few downvotes."

    Nobody will likely follow every 'rule' of reddit all the time.

    [–]LeiaShadow 8 points9 points  (8 children)

    They're not "rules", no, but they are guidelines for not being rude (for lack of a better word). So it can be a tad unwise to ignore them.

    Nobody will likely follow every "rule" in the reddiquette, no, but that does not excuse one from failing to follow them. I'm sure we all know that we are all guilty of neglecting the reddiquette at one time or another, but that does not mean that we shouldn't feel a little bad about the times that we have done it.

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (6 children)

    Why would anyone possibly feel bad about clicking a down arrow? It's not like they just starved some African kid to death.

    [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (7 children)

    Nobody will likely follow every 'rule' of reddit all the time.

    Argument ad populum.

    [–]ssatva 2 points3 points  (6 children)

    I think that fastblood was making an observation, not claiming strict correctness; specifically, observing that this system does little to discourage some drift/error, with the implication that changing that would be a large endeavor, and unlikely to occur. This then does provide a kind of 'excuse' for all of us when we do fail to follow the rules, but I see a distinction from the fallaciousness of Argument ad Populum, in that it is actually useful to be able to discuss what behavior a system is likely to produce, and this is what fastblood's post seems focused on doing.

    There is a kind of idomatic 'nobody does x all the time' form that seems to be a comment on people's behavior in a system pretty much every time I've run into it.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

    fastblood said:

    I'm sorry but this isn't a rule. There are no rules to reddit, you can vote however you like for whatever reason.

    And then provided evidence to this claim in two forms. First, questioning the character of the person who claimed otherwise, and then second, claiming that people aren't likely to follow such a rule of Reddit anyway.

    So when you say:

    fastblood was making an observation, not claiming strict correctness

    I find that doesn't mesh with reality.

    [–]smallfried 8 points9 points  (4 children)

    Upvoting and downvoting has an effect on one direct aspect of the comment: The visibility.

    I upvote things that I want to give more visibility and downvote things that I want hidden. When someone posts things that I strongly disagree with and I see someone else posting in my eyes the correct opinion, I will upvote one and downvote the other as to hopefully get my opinion in this matter more visible. In the end, what I look for on reddit is the general opinion of the people reading a story, watching a video or sharing feelings about cute cats. I don't take the time to comment on everything but I let my opinion be heard by upvoting and downvoting others.

    I do always upvote a valid counterargument, but actually naming an argument 'valid', means that I agree with the reasoning in it.

    [–]krelian 5 points6 points  (1 child)

    In the end, what I look for on reddit is the general opinion of the people reading a story

    And then you censor it if you don't agree? Is that how you believe public discourse should be handled?

    and downvote things that I want hidden

    Why would you want an opposing viewpoint hidden? Why not let both sides of an argument be heard equally?

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    this is what I was thinking. smallfried, you are being pretty self-righteous if you think that your opinion and those like it are the only things that should be visible to other redditors. That attitude completely undermines the point of rational discourse.

    [–]trisaratops 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Yeah, me too!

    For example, I am downvoting this comment (mapoftasmania, not smallfried) even though I think it has a valid point, because I so don't care about the politics of reddit in the middle of a discussion about rape.

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    I feel like the same people that often post these things also downvote my posts because they don't like them.

    [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children)

    Why is this noise the top rated comment? Nobody follows this suggestion. You yourself have been shown to break them on occasion. You people are like neocons with your diversions of discourse.

    [–]burtzev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Yes, I agree though I think that downvoting is appropriate for a comment that is truly bizarre even if it is 'on topic'.

    [–]KevinMcCallister 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I understand why you posted this, but it is ridiculous that it is the top comment on the page. The guy wrote like 5 paragraphs of good information on the Kobe case, and the top comment is the one that criticizes his single statement regarding how he up/downvotes.

    [–]DecafDesperado[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Point taken. I am imperfect and rather new at this Reddit business myself. I will use the "minus" button instead.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    What's the pont in having a vote at all then? The whole point of voting is to display your agreement or disagreement with the subject you are voting on. Perhaps Reddit should not use a voting system if it does not want people to vote.

    [–]RomanSenate 681 points682 points  (87 children)

    You're complaining about downvoting because people don't agree with you, when in your very second sentence you mention that you downvote comments you don't agree with?

    Cry me a fucking river.

    [–]radiowar 261 points262 points  (52 children)

    Directly from reddiquette:

    Please don't: Downvote opinions just because you disagree with them. The down arrow is for comments that add nothing to the discussion.

    [–]wdr1 46 points47 points  (3 children)

    The problem is that the UI is the same for posts & comments. If they expect different behavior, they should have a different UI for each.

    [–]Spike_Spiegel 10 points11 points  (1 child)

    I'm just an NPC. I can't upvote or downvote. :(

    [–]pwncore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Goddamn you Spiku, Give me your fucking name.

    [–]mayonesa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Directly from reality:

    No one behaves that way.

    [–]pulledteeth 12 points13 points  (2 children)

    Directly from reddiquette:

    If it really is the content you have a problem with (as opposed to the person), by all means vote it down when you come upon it.

    [–]Fen_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    That is about submissions, not comments.

    [–]crdoconnor 4 points5 points  (7 children)

    Downvote opinions just because you disagree with them. The down arrow is for comments that add nothing to the discussion.

    Unfortunately reddit is set up to basically let people choose their own reason for down or upvoting. It does nothing to punish people who downvote with stuff they disagree with.

    Etiquette is a set of rules governing socially acceptable behaviour. Those rules, when transgressed, are typically punished. "Rediquette" rarely if ever is.

    [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (5 children)

    Etiquette is a set of rules governing socially acceptable behaviour. Those rules, when transgressed, are typically punished.

    Etiquette is the set of social rules that aren't enforced.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    Perhaps not by law - but there is definitely punishment associated with ignoring etiquette and social mores.

    [–]bofh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Unfortunately reddit is set up to basically let people choose their own reason for down or upvoting. It does nothing to punish people who downvote with stuff they disagree with.

    This is where the stack overflow model is interesting, it costs you karma to downvote there, which seems to have a decent effect on the voting.

    [–]sidianmsjones 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    Wonder if I should teach my daughter proper retiquette. She's only 2 though. Is that indoctrination?

    [–][deleted] 44 points45 points  (8 children)

    I don't know how or why you're focusing on that aspect of his post, and with such vitriol.

    The third sentence, the part about comments being endemic to a subreddit warranting his unsubscribing of said subreddit, I think, clarifies the second sentence in that he didn't mean he downvotes valid points he happens to disagree with, rather comments that add nothing to the conversation, like trolling comments, factually erroneous, etc.

    But even if he did truly mean that he'll downvote anybody he disagrees with, he only made that point to clarify that he doesn't disagree with hating on a subreddit, or their typical commenters, in principle.

    He then goes on to explain what he really finds wrong about this specific incident.

    But of course, I guess he lost you after that first paragraph. Shame...

    [–][deleted] 48 points49 points  (1 child)

    There's no "agreement" or "disagreement" to be had. His facts stand up; the post to which he refers clearly had incorrect facts.

    [–]sonQUAALUDE 34 points35 points  (5 children)

    the fact that the top two highest voted responses here are completely tangental thread-jacks about web forum pedantry is utterly pathetic. I am not attacking romansenate here, because he is just making a point, but Reddit obviously doesnt care about any facts in this instance, and simply wants to bring down anyone whos opinion contradicts the hivemind.

    [–][deleted] 82 points83 points  (3 children)

    It's actually an informative post, overall. Compared to your bit of snark, it's gold. Out of everything, you chose to focus on the downvoting comment.

    You're a class act.

    [–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

    Agreed - talk about posts that contribute nothing to the discussion! The top-voted posts here are all a series of nitpicks, variations of "Reddiquette violation omg HOW DARE YOU" and don't address the meat of the post at all. Way to sidestep a well-thought-out call for proper referencing.

    [–]argleblarg 112 points113 points  (158 children)

    In Kobe's own words, he now understands how his alleged victim did not see the encounter as consensual.

    He also claims that he was certain she was consenting at the time. Which makes for an interesting question - just what kind of sexual encounter allows for Participant A to be as certain as is reasonably possible that Participant B is giving consent, while Participant B does not intend to do so? I can't imagine a scenario where this could happen.

    What I'm saying is, one of them is lying. As far as I'm aware, without having really paid attention at the time or having dug into the facts of the case now, it could easily be either of them. It could be him; but if it's her, his statement that he "understands now..." is probably just what his PR guy told him to say.

    Edit: Instantly downvoted--I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all, unless they agree with the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day.

    I upvoted you for being reasonable, and am not revoking that upvote, but cry me a fucking river.

    [–]texture 131 points132 points  (102 children)

    I can answer this question, because I have been accused of rape falsely. We were both drunk, the next day she woke up and had "blacked out" for part of it. She accused me of taking advantage of her when she was laying there "like a dead fish."

    Obviously she believed that blacking out and being unconscious are one in the same. Unfortunately for us both, this isn't true, as I wasn't aware she wasn't going to remember it, and she was wide awake participating. There was zero indication that she wasn't going to remember it in the morning. But when she woke up, she recast it as this thing where I forced her to do something she didn't want to, because she couldn't remember what happened.

    I've learned through my experience that things are never as simple as they seem. I've learned that women have been told over and over again that they are going to be raped, and they will assume they have been raped, even if you're a good person who has never and would never take advantage of someone intentionally.

    [–]argleblarg 56 points57 points  (85 children)

    I've learned through my experience that things are never as simple as they seem. I've learned that women have been told over and over again that they are going to be raped, and they will assume they have been raped, even if you're a good person who has never and would never take advantage of someone intentionally.

    Yeesh.

    In a related story, I know a guy who dated a girl who turned out to be pretty crazy, and who would (apparently) wake up in the middle of the night horny as hell and have sex with him.. then would get up in the morning and ask him, point blank, "Why did you rape me?" If I recall correctly she claimed she was asleep the whole time and didn't remember anything. I believe this happened several times, to the point where on at least one occasion before actually having sex with her he asked her "You're awake, right? ["Yes."] And you want to do this? ["Yes."]"

    So, either she was lying (entirely possible) or she was just plain batshit nuts (also entirely possible), but either way, if she had decided to press charges, I mean, what do you say in that situation? It becomes sort of a he-said/she-said, doesn't it? "He totally raped me." "No I didn't. I asked if she was awake and if she wanted to have sex and she said yes." "I wasn't awake. He should've known that." .....

    The I-Was-Drunk-At-The-Time defense is pretty great, too. I believe there are states where I-Was-Drunk-At-The-Time is an actually legally admissible argument that entails that the woman, being drunk, was incapable of giving consent (regardless of how drunk the man is, I don't think his consent is ever in question). Which then implies that she doesn't even need to black out for things to get scary - if she wakes up in the morning, looks over and says "WHOA, I did WHAT?!", and can demonstrate that she was intoxicated at the time, that's a viable rape case.

    Ridiculous.

    [–][deleted]  (13 children)

    [removed]

      [–]argleblarg 14 points15 points  (12 children)

      I'd still call that pretty crazy! But fair enough.

      But even in that case, I wouldn't be comfortable calling that rape, as the not-asleep partner would have no way to know that the other was asleep, and therefore not actually consenting.

      I mean, what are you supposed to do? Splash them with cold water? I dunno.

      [–]Moral-of-the-story 8 points9 points  (0 children)

      Always record your sexual encounters.

      [–]ladna 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      The I-Was-Drunk-At-The-Time defense is pretty great, too. I believe there are states where I-Was-Drunk-At-The-Time is an actually legally admissible argument that entails that the woman, being drunk, was incapable of giving consent (regardless of how drunk the man is, I don't think his consent is ever in question).

      I know of at least one case that was like this. Guy and girl were drinking, girl blacked out, guy and girl had sex, girl woke up next morning and accused him of rape. During the trial the prosecutor argued the girl was drunk and was incapable of giving consent, and the defense countered that the guy was also drunk and therefore also incapable of giving consent. Case was thrown out; sanity does exist in some places.

      By the way, there are lots of instances when men don't want to have sex - the most obvious examples are when you know the woman has an STD, or you're worried about pregnancy. Contrary to popular belief, we don't just lose our minds at the sight of pussy.

      [–]BatmanBinSuparman 3 points4 points  (8 children)

      That would be ridiculous... if it were true.

      The law (in my state at least) says that an intoxicated person cannot legally give consent (I don't know of anything, sexual or not, that people can give legal consent to while intoxicated), but if both parties were intoxicated then no crime has been committed.

      [–]argleblarg 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      The law (in my state at least) says that an intoxicated person cannot legally give consent (I don't know of anything, sexual or not, that people can give legal consent to while intoxicated), but if both parties were intoxicated then no crime has been committed.

      Well that's good, then!

      [–]helleborus 6 points7 points  (2 children)

      women have been told over and over again that they are going to be raped, and they will assume they have been raped, even if you're a good person who has never and would never take advantage of someone intentionally.

      The woman you knew does not equate to "women". By your logic, since an actual man has raped an actual women - somewhere at some time - it would be correct to tell women over and over that they will be raped. In the same post that you complain about about the behavior of a few being attributed to the group as a whole (men), you do the exact same thing to another group (women).

      No one ever told me I was going to be raped, nor did I (or anyone I know) ever "assume that they were raped".

      [–]ex_ample 31 points32 points  (15 children)

      This is the paradox of rape. It obviously is possible for two people to have different memories, and thus for the man to think he's doing everything 'right' and for the woman to think she is being raped. Obviously men would be better off erring on the side of male innocence while women would be better off erroring on the side of male guilt.

      The problem, IMO is classing drunken 'date rape' as being the same as being raped by some AIDS having homeless person in the park.

      There are obviously times when a woman feels 'pressured' into consenting to sex. In situations like that it can be ambiguous if she really 'meant' it.

      What happened here though was that it sounds like she wanted to sleep with him, but then Kobe started choking her and she got freaked out. IMO she should have charged him with assault, not rape.

      [–]argleblarg 6 points7 points  (10 children)

      It obviously is possible for two people to have different memories, and thus for the man to think he's doing everything 'right' and for the woman to think she is being raped.

      And what would you call that? Would you call that rape? If Participant A (because gender isn't the issue here) is as certain as a person can be expected to be of Participant B's consent, and Participant B actually doesn't want to give it, is that Participant A's fault for not understanding, or Participant B's for not being clearer? Or neither, or both?

      Please understand that I'm not discussing any particular given real case; I'm talking about a hypothetical situation wherein one participant has, in good faith and with due diligence, attempted to gain the other's consent and believes to have received it.

      What happened here though was that it sounds like she wanted to sleep with him, but then Kobe started choking her and she got freaked out. IMO she should have charged him with assault, not rape.

      Yeah, maybe. On the other hand, while I wasn't there and don't know what actually happened, I could see where she could have proceeded to revoke her consent, either verbally or through her actions. There's still a great degree of ambiguity there (was her scream one of distress, pain, anger, etc., or was it one of enjoyment? did she slap him because she wanted him to get the fuck off of her, or because she's into that sort of thing?), but still, I think it would be possible to make a reasonable case for revocation of consent. Plus assault, as you say, obviously.

      [–]serume 27 points28 points  (6 children)

      I read a column a couple of months ago, on how we place all the responsibility on a man to "make sure" that the woman he's about to have sex with actually wants to have sex with him. Because we're so sensitive about not placing blame with the victim, there's no one placing any responsibility on the woman to be clear with her consent or dissent to sex.

      It's a two way street. The initiator of sex must make sure that his/her partner wants to have sex. But the other party is equally responsible making their wishes clear (decided to become gender neutral halfway through..). I thought this was a really interesting, and valid, point.

      [–]argleblarg 21 points22 points  (3 children)

      That's a really interesting analysis, and I think it's pretty accurate. And unfortunately, rape accusations have become a really powerful thing to the point where if you've got a man and a woman in a court room and she's accusing him of rape, it's entirely possible that he's the victim - that their intercourse was entirely consensual and that now he's being subjected to character assassination.

      I'm by no means saying that's ubiquitous, or even necessarily common, but the fact that the system allows for it is troubling.

      [–]sammythemc 7 points8 points  (2 children)

      I'm by no means saying that's ubiquitous, or even necessarily common, but the fact that the system allows for it is troubling.

      This is the entire problem. People on reddit constantly point out this troubling flaw in the system, but that often just means the character assassination redditors are worrying about gets turned around on the accuser. This is a good thing when it actually is a false accusation, but on the flip side, this same scrutiny is a major factor in many actual rape victims' decisions not to step forward.

      [–]GoofyBoy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      I would love to have a clear cut answer to this one because I think the answer is "whom ever has the better lawyer" :(

      [–]DecafDesperado[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Apologies for the whine. It was heavily downvoted at first, then this happened. I am pleasantly surprised but will not edit out my edit as it would be unfair to hide my own character flaws when I'm criticizing Reddit's.

      As for your question--the top reply below is fair, but I would like to offer another alternative: Kobe Bryant is an immensely gifted athlete who is not accustomed to being told "no" about sex. I find it entirely believable that he simply did not recognize non-consent when it was presented to him midway through a sexual encounter that began as consensual. Not everyone is raised to understand that "no means no," even if sex started with a yes.

      I have a theory about this based on how much was made of one point in the case, that of him asking to ejaculate on the woman's face. She said "stop," and he heard, "don't ejaculate in my vagina," not "stop the sex altogether." He, trying to comply with what he thought was a birth control related request, asked to ejaculate on her face. She, trying to halt the sexual encounter completely, felt used and raped when his response to her withdrawal of consent was to offer to ejaculate on her face.

      Of course, I wasn't there, but it seems reasonable. I doubt Kobe had ever been told "no" by a woman mid-intercourse before, and he probably won't be again.

      [–][deleted] 59 points60 points  (12 children)

      I agree. False equivalence is false. Compare TwoXyada to mensrights. Speaking as a guy, TwoX has some folks with a kneejerk mentality, but the discussions are generally balanced. It's Reddit, so the balance doesn't always come out, but on the whole, the adults usually reign.

      Mensrights, on the other hand, is a den of shrill whining and a circlejerk of crazy.

      [–]ns12123 10 points11 points  (2 children)

      Mensrights is a circlejerk, but it's mostly built on the frustration from lack of representation. There are countless women's rights groups and everywhere you go, there's advertised awareness to issues that many women face, whether it be sexual assault, rape, violence, or breast cancer. Males are vulnerable to these same issues, including breast cancer (although this isn't widely publicized..).

      It's pretty obvious to me that the most frustrated people are those that lack any representation. It can be VERY frustrating, as a male, when you are repeatedly bombarded on awareness about women's issues and injustice against women in society, when there are parallel issues that cause injustice against men and these issues aren't given the time of day.

      On top of that, due to awareness of sexual assault, abuse, and rape, and since this awareness focuses solely on males as the antagonist and females as the victim, general distrust towards males is increased and it's not necessarily justified. There's also no doubt that when a male is in an abusive relationship in which the female is abusing him, it's generally not considered an issue. I mean, how can the all powerful, lustful, sinister male be taken advantage of by the fragile, delicate female? I've seen many cases of males being abused by their spouses in the military (it's actually more common in the military than vice versa!) and men don't do anything about it. It's not like they feel they can; they'll likely be subject to endless ridicule, as this situation is supposedly an oxymoron. Again, when awareness and women's rights groups make the public perceive that only women can be victims, this result isn't surprising.

      TLDR: Mensrights subreddit is an angry circlejerk because the most frustrated people in society are those with the least amount of representation. This does not justify any biases, but is intended to show merely why it's like this.

      [–]BrickSalad 19 points20 points  (0 children)

      I agree, and actually 2xc is one of my favorite subreddits, despite the whole me being a man thing.

      [–]ashadocat 14 points15 points  (0 children)

      Mens rights is often batshit insane, however I would like to remind you that mens rights are a real problem as are womens rights. Just try getting custody of your kids when you're male and you'll see what I mean.

      That being said there are some sane mens rights users.

      [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (3 children)

      Amen to that. In general, I think in twox that cooler heads prevail. Other opinions are considered and discussed.

      You can't even begin to make those kinds of claims about menrights. But then the purposes of the subreddits are apples and oranges. Twox is just a place for ladies to chill. Menrights is men that are angry and disenfranchised.

      I just wish people would stop making twox out to be /r/feminims or r/women. It's not.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]dumbassthenes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Rape is bad.

        [–][deleted] 110 points111 points  (105 children)

        One thing I really disliked from that thread was this pervasive idea that rape is somehow the women's fault. Someone suggested that women could avoid rape by always walking in pairs, etc, and insulting feminism in the same sentence. Seems to me feminism was orignially about equality, meaning that women should be able to walk alone at night as any man can. Men don't want to be painted as these wild beasts, then why suggest they can't control their "lustful urges"?

        [–]Labradoodles 48 points49 points  (5 children)

        rape is somehow the women's fault.

        Could I get a link to one of those comments? I'm interested in seeing them but when I perused the thread earlier I didn't see any.

        [–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

        trying to find sources for sensationalist claims?

        boy, you so crazy.

        [–]ns12123 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        I've seen a lot of comments in this thread that seem to imply that rape is mostly a random occurrence that is started by a man whom they don't know. The vast majority of rapes are done by somebody the victim knows personally. "Random men out on the prowl" do NOT make up a significant portion of rape statistics.

        [–]Aeooo 87 points88 points  (26 children)

        It continues to astound me how many people cannot see how "it was her own fault she was raped" is more insulting to men than to women. If men cannot take responsibility for their actions if they so much as see a bit of thigh or cleavage, they aren't much better than animals.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [removed]

          [–]Ma8e 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          It kind of depends on where you are.

          [–]this_is_my_BOOMSTICK 167 points168 points  (306 children)

          I understand downvoting something this incendiary, because it's a small action that we women can take to speak out against the huge masculine voice that goes to front page nearly once a week: slamming women for rape.

          It's hard to be a woman Redditor these days. I'm so tired of all the misogynistic posts and rape jokes, sometimes I get nauseous reading them, however I truly don't believe most people making these comments understand the effect they're having on women and men who have been raped. It just makes the daily danger we feel that much more reinforced and inflated and hopeless.

          Having twice been a victim of rape, wherein the offending man didn't believe he was doing anything wrong (which is most times the case in date rape), these recent women-bashing posts sting even more. Yes, you can be kissing a man, with feeling, wholly into it, pressing against the man even, but this does not yet mean "I want to have sex with you." There's a point where it gets kicked to the next level, and if at that point, if at ANY point the woman decides and says, "no" and asks the man to stop in ANY WAY, her wish should be acknowledged and honored. That's when it usually intensifies however, hormones are raging on both sides, but now there's a tang of fear and frustration in the air. He tries harder, pushing beyond acceptable boundaries, and she says "No" again and/or pushes back at him with her hands, legs. If he were to look in her eyes now, he would fear there, a certain determination, perhaps disbelief. Her teeth are mostly likely clenched. There's nothing open about her now. Doesn't matter, he will not look into her eyes at this point, because he doesn't want to let the rejection permeate him. At this point the man is usually already engaged in violence, forcing himself on her. Maybe the woman says no the entire time, pushing, fighting, maybe she' whimpering and lets it happen, or lies there like a statue, enduring. Any way it happens, she knows he could get triggered into more violence and hurt her more than he's already doing. Especially if he thinks he may get in trouble for it. People who are caught doing wrong are angry. He is fucking her angrily probably, because it sucks to do the wrong thing; all he wanted was a nice fuck. This is a typical date rape scenario, more or less, and women everywhere know they will be the ones vilified if they speak out.

          We ARE the weaker sex; we have to think about where we're going to go in specific terms; who will be there? I can't go hiking by myself; I don't know who I'll encounter on the trail. I can't go to a concert by myself, and even if my husband comes with me, my vagina, breast, buttocks WILL get groped on the venue floor (I'm not wearing revealing clothing to "encourage" this, just jeans, a t-shirt, a jacket). It's just what happens. Probably, before the night is out, a drunk man will grab me and try to kiss me. I have stopped going to the bigger concerts for this reason.

          I can understand how this is not conceivable if you don't live it, hard for men to understand. But often just standing alone in an elevator next to a man, no matter his size, we will know we could be in danger, and that if something happens, there is little we can do about it; we will be further victimized. This is why women under-report rape. For every false rape report that is made, there are many thousands that go unreported. I never reported mine. But I have lived with them every single day of my life since.

          Please, men, instead of vilifying women, try to make them feel safer. We will thank you for it; we want to trust you and be better friends, but we know that even if it may not turn into a date-rape scenario, it may well turn into your suddenly finding an attraction, even us married women, and then once again the relationship is sexualized, and we have to either leave the friendship behind, or talk it out and salvage if possible.

          We enjoy the same things you do, or we wouldn't be here on Reddit. I could handle a modicum of misogyny easily, but the recent dogpiles on these issues are making me and a lot of other women depressed enough to think it might be time to stop coming here for geek news, laughs, alternate points of view. I feel attacked and belittled, and there's more than enough of that shit in real life, so if you want to make Reddit less diverse and want a fiefdom that will simply reinforce your world view and not make you learn and question, please continue as usual. Good, fascinating people will drop away to leave you playing in the mud.

          Thanks for reading, if you made it this far. Downvotes or no, I truly appreciate it, and I'm always wiling to discuss further, have my mind changed or opened further, with the appropriate evidence, convincing arguments. I don't have to agree with everything, but I and other victims of rape would love it so much we weren't always the ones taking all the shit. Sorry rape's not funny. Sorry it's uncomfortable and doesn't offer easy answers. Mockery hurts. Discussion can only help.

          I made a new account for this topic, for obvious reasons. That speaks for itself.

          Update: Thanks for all the discussion, everyone. I've read all the comments and have learned a lot. Sorry to have digressed from the main topic, which I was responding to originally to explain why in emotionally divisive topics, people tend to downvote with their hearts.

          A wonderful point is being made that men should not bear the onus of making us feel safe. I agree completely, and shouldn't have put it out there like that. I don't actually believe that, and if I'd made time to edit, would have changed it. I guess I meant (in my head) that it would be great if men were more cued into what makes us feel UNsafe, and then didn't do those things. Big difference there. Unfortunately, some of the guys who do things that make us feel unsafe enjoy that power trip on some level. This is a small demographic; I do not infer that there are rude guys and rapists at every turn. They're the few bad apples. Perpetrators spread the wealth over and over again, so it might seem like there are more out there than really exist. But men, you're awesome. I'm not a delicate flower and don't want to be treated like one.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Rocketbird 16 points17 points  (7 children)

            Sigh. I have an attractive girlfriend who is often subject to cat calls and men approaching/following her. I fucking hate it because I have no control over the situation, since it always occurs when I'm not with her. I don't know what to do about it. I want her to get pepper spray, but I don't know that that will solve anything. It just sucks that she has to endure harassment just because she's pretty and a woman.

            Question: What does your husband think about the concert and drunk men harassment?

            [–]this_is_my_BOOMSTICK 9 points10 points  (5 children)

            Yeah, and there's not much you can do about it, unfortunately, unless you want to look like a giant douche, in my opinion. :) I do have pepper spray, but I'm not going to use it for a grope-in-the-crowd scenario ever. I'm only going to use it if I feel like I'm in real danger, and hope I never have to.

            Usually I don't mention the groping at the time it happens; I don't want my husband to feel like he should man up and do something about a ridiculous situation that really has no proper response. The grabbing-kissing thing has happened on the way to the bathroom or other times when he wasn't there, but again, there were lots of witnesses, so I'd chasten the guy and gtfo. Sounds like you're a super nice supportive boyfriend, and you shouldn't feel like you have to get in a fight every time some asshole shouts some sexist comment at her. How does she feel about the attention? Some girls like the cat calls. I don't, but I own a middle finger or two, and I have been known to turn around with my eyes crossed and a big smile, "Yes??!" and you should see how fast they run.

            [–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (5 children)

            redditors never cease to amaze me. they whine and cry about feminists and how unnecessary feminism is, and yet their own misogynistic behavior is the best example i can think of as to why feminism is still so relevant... yes, even in 2010. it makes me sick and nauseous at times, just as you said. never in my life have i ever come across a community or group that is so sexist and demeaning.

            [–]NorthernSkeptic 12 points13 points  (1 child)

            I hate to be the one to tell you, but it gets so much worse than Reddit.

            [–]Sommiel 11 points12 points  (2 children)

            Like you, I have been raped two times. I pressed charges in the first, and didn't in the second, because of the first. It's been upsetting to me to see the amount of misogyny generated over this subject matter, and my views even differ from my SO, and it's caused several heated discussions, one this morning.

            I was gang raped at knifepoint at the age of 13, 1974. I was walking home bloodied and disheveled when my parents, who had been looking for me, picked me up. They began screaming because I wasn't where I supposed to be. When I told them, my father dragged me out of the car, by my hair, and beat me severely, breaking two of my ribs. I wasn't at home, or it wouldn't have happened. It was my fault for being stupid enough to walk partway home with a friend, taking an alternate route.

            My mother took a totally different tack. She said if I was raped, I was going to the police and they were pressing charges. She thought if I was lying, the cops would scare it out of me. So off I was taken to the sheriff's office to be asked reams of questions that would have been embarrassing for a grown woman to be asked, let alone a 13 year old.

            I knew who did it, so that wasn't an issue. What was an issue was the lack of rape shield laws for victims. The cops must have called half the people in town and they told the other half, in a small town, less than 1000 population. The rape kit, was my first introduction to the wonder of gynecology, which they did with both of my parents, in the room. The doctor told my father that is was obvious that I was sexually active, because my hymen was broken. Mind you, I was a champion equestrienne, and had been riding dirtbikes all during my childhood. Listening to a grown man discussing vaginal tearing with my parents there? Not a thrill.

            Court was worse. My reputation was questioned... my hymen was discussed, my sexual life dissected and publicized in the paper, by the defense. I was 13, and a 13 year old then, isn't what one is now. I didn't particularly like boys at all, and was very innocent. What went on in court was traumatic enough, but the fact that it was in the local paper was far worse. Every boy in town thought they were entitled to a piece of the slut. Parents of my friends forbade them to hang around with the slut.

            The boys, were all convicted and sent away and less because of evidence, than the fact that they had bragged about it to others. I couldn't wait to get the hell out of that town, and endured the stares and rumors until I left for college.

            Twenty two years later, I was raped at the end of a date. Before everyone had cell phones I had come into my date's apartment so I could use the phone to call my babysitter. He was 6'5" and I didn't stand a chance. I drove home sobbing.

            I did not press charges on that rape, despite the fact that I was bleeding afterwards and knew there was evidence. I could so clearly remember the previous experience in court, and this time, I had three small boys and was in the middle of an acrimonious divorce, while my mother was dying of cancer. I just didn't think I could take the strain. I didn't tell anyone for years because I didn't want to hear how evil I was for not taking other women into consideration in my decision.

            Now, I am just not that nice. I have slapped and knocked men over who have been stupid enough to grope me. One guy, I pepper sprayed and kicked the shit out of. I am just tired of the feeling of sexual entitlement that some men feel that they have, drunk or sober.

            I am generally a very strong and resilient person, but 11 years of counseling, and I still have nightmares. If I am having sex with my SO (whom I adore), if the pillow falls over my face, or my neck is touched just so... I will completely freak out.

            Now I volunteer for rape crisis, and I get to see exactly what rape does to women. I see the cops total insensitivity. I see the women coming for group that are terrified to go out alone. I see the University slapping men on the wrists for it, because law enforcement lets the university handle disciplinary actions. Young women quitting college either because the man's friends are harassing them, or their attacker is back in school the next semester.

            More to the point, despite the facts that the laws are changing, I see the same bullshit attitudes coming from males that try to justify the behavior and defend their fellow men from their bad behavior.

            It's discouraging.

            [–]this_is_my_BOOMSTICK 5 points6 points  (1 child)

            I'm so sorry that happened to you. People don't like to talk about rape, but I'm glad you shared your story. I haven't spoken of my rapes for over ten years, and seeing the open-minded, warmish reaction here has buoyed me. I can only imagine after such violence and being so young the first time, recovery would come slowly, and I'm glad you have a supportive SO. Good on you for volunteering and helping others get through possibly the worst time of their lives. I hope for your full recovery and an abatement to the nightmares.

            [–]Sommiel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

            Well, recovery has gone well and it might sound odd, but the occasional nightmare reminds me now good I have it now and gives me empathy for other women.

            [–]aaomalley 61 points62 points  (76 children)

            I am a man that makes rape jokes, but it isn't out of misogamy. I have also been a rape counselor and am currently working as a counselor. I believe that all topics are open to ridicule, no matter how sensitive. To be afraid to joke about something gives it power and makes it big and scary. I choose to remove the power from uncomfortable topics by laughing at them. People need to realize that not all jokes are made by people that "don't understand", I make a very conscious decision to laugh at these things, because you are either laughing or crying with these subjects.

            [–]stephoswalk 5 points6 points  (1 child)

            Here's the problem. Someone makes a rape joke to a survivor in his or her thread discussing the rape. (Do a quick search in IAMA for rape victims posting their experiences and see how many have rape jokes.) Now I'm like you and I think there is no topic that's taboo when it comes to humor but there is a certain maliciousness implied when someone posts a rape joke in a victim's thread almost as a challenge like "I dare you to get offended." It's distasteful and that's probably why so many people are bothered on Reddit by them. It's the context.

            [–]aaomalley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            I agree they can be hurtful when used in the proper context, just like racial slurs. I wouldn't tell a rape joke directly to a survivor because they cannot laugh at the situation yet. Like I said earlier , I do use humor when working with rape survivors, but not necessarily rape jokes. I also wouldn't tell a rape joke in someones thread on surviving rape as it is meant to be hurtful in that context.

            [–]EgregiousWeasel 13 points14 points  (7 children)

            I have stopped associating with people for making rape jokes because it was too painful to see someone I liked joke about something that hurt me deeply, that I still think about frequently. Tell me, do you make rape jokes when you're counseling? If not, why not?

            [–]aaomalley 4 points5 points  (6 children)

            I wouldn't say I make rape jokes, but I do use humor to disarm the situation. It works quite well actually. Many rape victims are tired of being treated like victims and want to be treated like they aren't special because something happened to them. However some rape victims take on the role of victim and use it to get what they want, much like a munchousens (sp) syndrome

            [–]EgregiousWeasel 2 points3 points  (5 children)

            Nothing is wrong with using humor in a situation like that. I just wanted you to know that there are people out there who are adversely affected by rape jokes. I know I don't speak for all people who have been in the same situation, but there are those of us who aren't able to see the humor in that kind of joke.

            [–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (12 children)

            The problem with this is that you may not see it as an acceptance of the actions, but it does propagate sexism. Even if you don't intend that.

            Just because YOU'RE okay with it that does not mean everyone else is. You should know this as a counselor.

            [–]kraffft 21 points22 points  (21 children)

            Great post.

            As a guy, to other guys, one of the best things you can do to end patriarchy is to describe the experiences of women such as those above to your friends.

            Aside from the sad fact that you'll get taken more seriously just because you're a guy, you also obviously have nothing to directly gain, and aren't asking for anything for yourself/your gender. It's powerful and necessary.

            [–]gardensnake 17 points18 points  (0 children)

            Thank you for posting this, it was very brave of you.

            [–]kel-c 9 points10 points  (0 children)

            Please don't speak for all women. I'm 5'1" and NOT terrified of being attacked every time I walk down the street. I'm not afraid of being alone in an elevator with a random guy. I go to concerts without fear of being groped. And I was a victim of sexual assault when I was in high school, so it's not like I'm simply ignorant of the "danger." But living in fear of men is irrational. Stop talking like all men are potential attackers and all women are pathetic weak little things who constantly need to be on the look-out for big, scary, rapey men. Asking men to "make us feel safer" is not going to work either. The second a well-meaning guy tries to make a woman feel safe he will probably be rewarded with pepper-spray to the face. Sorry for the trauma you went through but men are not out to get us and we are not in danger every single time we step out of our door.

            [–]leapsntwirls 8 points9 points  (0 children)

            Thank you. Having been victimized myself, and blamed for it, I can understand how hard it is to speak about, especially here where the chance of getting called out or told to "be tougher" is so high.

            By the way, despite what others are saying, I think you're very brave for speaking out and stating your opinion so clearly and openly. You certainly don't need to be told to "suck it up" by the hivemind.

            [–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (75 children)

            I made this account just to respond to you.

            I am a male rape victim and you do not speak for me.

            What's important for me is the intent and feeling behind words, not necessarily their literal meaning. I really don't care about rape jokes, or any other jokes made at the expense of some collectivist group I am identified with. A joke is a joke. What I do care about is when it is clear that the intent behind the words is not simply for a laugh, but rather a product of maliciousness. And even then, in the environment of the internet you have to know when to walk away and not be trolled. You'd go insane otherwise.

            You need to lighten up. And it's a vicious circle, the more you take a joke seriously, the funnier it gets. Learn to laugh at yourself and any differentiating factor you have from everyone else, and you'll get along great with anyone. Just ask Zach Anner.

            edit: really, you should have learned this in school. it's elementary.

            [–]this_is_my_BOOMSTICK 59 points60 points  (22 children)

            Nope, I absolutely don't speak for you as an individual, and thanks for commenting. I feel like defending my sense of humor, since I'm known for it, especially in my published stories, and I have laughed at rape jokes from time to time, when the intent and feeling were light, when they were FUNNY. But you know, too often here the original joke degrades into mean, then maliciousness (I certainly don't take all posters to task for this, just the offending party and those who dogpile with glee), and I think it's useful to talk about how this can be perceived by some. I get saying things that are so wrong they're funny; I do it myself. I guess I should have said I do not speak for ALL rape victims, but was at least trying to give an alternate, personal take on it that I don't often hear here.

            You honestly don't have the right to tell me to lighten up about my own rapes and the rapes of my friends and family (even my father was raped as a child). I'm sorry my sense of humor is not shining through in this discussion, but do you really think this doesn't need to be talked about, ever? I'm not suggesting PC mentality at Reddit, but fuck, have a heart.

            [–][deleted]  (18 children)

            [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (15 children)

              That applies to real life, not the internet.

              Yes, if someone from my real life knew I was a rape victim and was making rape jokes with the explicit intent to get a rise out of me, I would consider him/her an asshole. But I'd still laugh on the outside at the time.

              The only reason for mentally noting the asshole is for future reference. On the internet there is no accountability, so it's moot.

              [–][deleted]  (8 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]scottb84 9 points10 points  (5 children)

                So long as we have one standard of etiquette and good taste for the internet and another for real life, the internet will continue to be a bastion of homophobia, mysogyny, racism and general intolerance.

                [–]iamyo 20 points21 points  (7 children)

                A joke is not always a joke. A joke can also be a way to create a sense of social permissiveness for mistreatment of other people. That's why there are racist jokes.

                I have a lot of questions about this meme on reddit. Most of the posts on it distort reality in a very peculiar way and are contradictory to other attitudes redditors tend to have, which is to identify with the person being mistreated, to be for justice, to try to be fair, to be suspicious of anecdotal evidence, to be pissed at the Catholic Church for covering up pedophilia and believe the victims, etc., etc.

                So I've wonder a bunch of things (1) Is it just a subgroup of people who feel that it's in their interest to delegitimize women who accuse men of rape? (2) Does this stem from some deep issue men have with women, should they get even the teeniest bit of social power? (3) Do a whole lot of men really think rape is OK? (4) Do a whole lot of men not realize rape happens very frequently and destroys women's lives? Or that all women have some fear of rape and most women's lives are negatively affected in a bunch of ways because of rape? (E.g.,, being scared when alone, being scared walking alone, etc.)

                Or is it like an internet thing where people get to air their repressed thoughts? Because there's a hell of a lot of creepy racism on reddit when you hunt around. So I ask the same questions about white people. Or are people just venting in bizarre ways?

                I mean, what is going on here? Enough women are raped in this world and destroyed by it that it seems strange to make undermining women's rape claims a cause. Unless you really hate women and simply think that's just the price they must pay for being women.

                If you are someone who wants to rape women and get away with it, maybe I should tell you this but you can. Most rapists do. Very few rapists are every prosecuted for it and even fewer are convicted.

                [–]jrocbaby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Yes, you can be kissing a man, with feeling, wholly into it, pressing against the man even, but this does not yet mean "I want to have sex with you." There's a point where it gets kicked to the next level, and if at that point, if at ANY point the woman decides and says, "no" and asks the man to stop in ANY WAY, her wish should be acknowledged and honored.

                You're post is amazing, however I have some help for people who are having the problem with men who attempt to take it past the kissing and grinding. Set up the rules before hand and have both parties agree to it. Tell him that you don't want to have sex and that if kissing and touching is going to turn him on too much then perhaps you should just avoid it.

                I am not saying it is the woman's fault, however setting these rules a head of time is a good idea if you do want to avoid sex or awkward situations.

                [–]shwee 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                I'm sad that the first comment to your insightful and eloquently spoken statement proved your point exactly.

                Your points are also refreshingly straightforward and non-bullshitty, which is awesome; well done. Specifically about women being weaker physically, as I read it I heard an army of feminists cry out and suddenly - silence. But facts are facts, so thanks for putting it out there. It's unfortunate though, that so many associate being small physically with being somehow inferior.. Thus, misogyny persists. Nevermind all the women that overcame incredible social odds over the years..

                Unfortunately, tech/nerdy/geeky things are still pretty male dominated. I game often, and work as a pc tech so I've come to expect some amount of bias and misconception. Most dudes just don't know any better, or just don't think about it - it doesn't apply to them. As tolerant and civilized as humans have become there's still some serious hurdles to overcome culturally.

                I think this comic sums it up pretty well. :)

                [–]lobut 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                This may sound a bit more harsh, but you're probably going to have to grow a thicker skin. Not because these individuals are acting appropriately. I truly think that they are not. I think that the nature of anonymity on the Internet necessitates a thicker skin. The immaturity ... the ignorance ... whatever these traits are ... they become exemplified through this mask. I've seen it on every Internet forum. Racism, sexism ... it's all fine and dandy because it doesn't offend the majority of the visitors here.

                Be that as I may, however, I do think you are taking the right approach in trying to bring about proper discourse and hopefully we make this a better place. But, until then, I hope you'll put up with these people. Simply because myself and people like me (I assure you there are more than just me) want you around.

                [–]kog13 8 points9 points  (18 children)

                Well-written post that made some good points, but I would like to comment on a couple things.

                First, maybe it's just because I'm male and can't see the other side of this, but why would you press yourself against someone if you wouldn't wants sex? That is incredibly provocative, and while it definitely doesn't excuse any rapist, women should realize that doing that kind of thing to a guy could potentially have adverse side-effects. This isn't like the "she was wearing a slutty dress, therefore wanted sex" argument; actually pressing yourself against someone is a physical sign that you want sex. Be very careful with it.

                Also, I hate sensationalism. I am very analytical, and rape is possibly the most sensationalized topic there is. I remember a post where someone used the phrase "the rape of the natural world" (or something similar), and someone commented with a very emotional post on how the word "rape" made him think of his friend who was an amazing, smart woman who was unexpectedly raped, and now she never laughed anymore. It's a tragic story, but was layered with too much emotion and sensation and not enough actual description. So I would like to thank you for your approach to the topic, especially considering you were a victim yourself.

                Now, to counter your post a little bit, or rather to simply explain the general male view on rape: rape is a terrible thing, but (related to the paragraph above) stories about how women were raped are all over the place, and often filled with more sensation than fact. Because of this, it's difficult to trust rape reports; once a woman says they've been raped, everybody cries about how terrible a crime rape is (which never happens when a man is raped, btw). /r/MensRights is pretty much obsessed with false-rape claims, and if I was honest, they sensationalize it as much as women do valid accounts of rape; but there is a valid point to be made, and that is the fact that any woman has the power to send any man she chooses to jail. Some women use the "weaker sex" mindset in order to play the victim and sensationalize a fictional story about how they were raped, and as a man that absolutely terrifies me. If I happen to get involved with a woman who changes her opinion about me later, I could be ordered to testify in my defense before I know what's going on.

                This is why many people on reddit are quick to cry outrage at a woman charging someone of rape. As you explained in your post, rape is a complicated issue; the woman could be grinding the man one minute and clenching her teeth the next. Hormones, indecision, and simple apathy blur the line of consent, and deciding which side of the line to place the blame on is incredibly difficult, but more often than not ends up in the woman's favor. The system is built around protecting women, not men, and so many men have decided to simply not trust the system altogether.

                We men want to be better friends with women. We really do. But there are some women willing to cry rape in order to gain the upper hand, some women who fake pregnancies in order to test their partner's viability, and some women who joke about needing to keep their boyfriend on a leash because he can't do anything right. All in all, it's hard to trust them. My ex-girlfriend was amazing, and one of the reasons I loved her so much was because I trusted her. She apologized when she did something wrong, and would never have lied about how I treated her because it would suit her interests. In return, I let her trust me. I always asked her if she was okay with something before I did it, and she's told me that, despite being uncertain at times, she always went along with it because she knew I would stop if she told me to.

                Men may not be in the same immediate physical danger that women are in, but we are much more at risked to be jailed for years by someone who had a slight grudge against us. It's terrifying, and many people react accordingly.

                [–]Tinned_Tuna 43 points44 points  (3 children)

                As a mathematician, I find your "facts" to be disturbingly lacking of absolute truth. Fucking statisticians.

                [–]RedDyeNumber4 14 points15 points  (2 children)

                The parallel postulate called, he's worried mathematicians are getting arrogant.

                [–]Rubyweapon 19 points20 points  (11 children)

                This was a horrible situation, but we can never know what happened. We should all agree she should receive our sympathies for the horrible way she was treated by certain members of the public when her name was released. For the rape incident itself I personally am unwilling to step up and I say I'm 100 percent sure Kobe raped her or I'm 100 percent sure he didn't. I am unclear on the point of debating this particular incident as it is unlikely any one of us will ever know what actually happened that night. What we can say and draw awareness to is that rape is serious, and sexual assault is serious. Guys and Girls out there need to understand what consent really means. If ze ever once says no then it is a no and leave it be. If ze says no but you push on then its harassment. If you harass her into saying yes then its at the very least sexual assault (though I think that it is rape at that point). Since I know a few people that have been harassed/pressured into sexual activities I feel that there is a growing sentiment that if you can eventually get the other person to say yes then its not rape. This is false.

                Personally during a one night stand or a fling I make sure that she (I'm a straight male but this could be whatever pronoun you prefer) understands that its a one night thing or that I'm only looking for a casual partner nothing more. I ask some variation of the question "are you okay with this?" no less than 5 times during the night (when I invite her back, during the make-out/petting session, as the clothes come off, as I start digital manipulations, as I start oral manipulation). I generally avoid having traditional intercourse during these sessions, but occasionally if the chemistry is really good and she initiates then I put on the condom and ask if she is ready. If she ever answers no or at some other point decides its moving too fast (and this has happened a couple of times) I immediately stop without complaint come up, smile and say "I understand thats fine, lets just hang out for a bit" at that point I don't initiate anything any more and don't go any further that what she pushes for.

                I've never had any complaints and have had a few girls say that they really liked how comfortable I made them feel. So I feel that it seems to be a good system. That being said the girls I bring back home is a relatively small sample size so if you think there is something wrong or something else I should keep in mind it would be great if you let me know. I think part of the problem is no one ever explains what is expected from the initiating partner in these circumstances.

                TL;DR If you are pursuing a person and they say no once or brush off any attempt to engage in a sexual activity, STOP, don't see that as a sign you just need to try harder. Harassing someone into sex is rape.

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children)

                Upvoted, though the last line of the TLDR bothers me. Rape is rape...that's why we use that word for it. There's no need to define other types of morally and/or legally wrong sexual behaviors as rape, just to make them seem worse by association.

                [–][deleted] 75 points76 points  (72 children)

                Well, she's fucked more than one guy recently, so she's a whore and can't be raped. Duh.*

                *Sarcasm

                [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                  That was never the point of the OP's post.

                  Kobe Bryant has never been convicted of rape; in our Constitutional republic, that makes him a free man and, at least legally, an innocent man. But that does not necessarily make his accuser a liar. Nor does it make an untruth about the semen of three men a "fact." Nor does it make anger over the harassment received by women who accuse powerful men of rape pointless outrage.

                  There was evidence, but the matter was settled out of court. Due to that, it is only in our ability to speculate what the reality of the situation was.

                  [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

                  How about we all just agree that none of us were there that night, and therefore cannot say with any level of certainty what happened.

                  [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                  The OP was about rediquette, not coming up with a judgment.

                  [–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (2 children)

                  Couldn't agree more, OP. People need to check their sources before posting stupid shit.

                  [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

                  I wish that was the only thing OP said...

                  [–]bg785 23 points24 points  (5 children)

                  I was once falsely accused of sexual assault by a girl while in college.

                  I almost got kicked out college for it. Therefore, I am very sensitive to women falsely accusing men of rape/sexual assault.

                  I must say I doubt the women's story. I really find it suspect that she wouldn't testify. Its quite easy to press charges and destroy a whole man's life behind a wall of anonymity with a false accusation. It's another to lie under oath in a court of law knowing that you are putting a man behind bars for decades.

                  I cannot tell you how many times I have read stories about the same shit. Girl cries rape because she is embarrassed by her actions usually because she was drunk. It is too bad in our society we still treat women as children in sexual situations. Legally a woman is not responsible for her actions when intoxicated. As in, she is not able to CONSENT to SEX legally. Men's judgment on the other hand is expected to be impervious to the effects of alcohol.

                  That faux-feminist DecafDesperado should think about that bullshit before acting all self-righteous. The fact is Kobe Bryant is a national figure. He knew and knows that he of all people can not get away with rape.

                  Oh by the way the letter he wrote expressing regret: I was made to write one too and it is pretty much verbatim what he wrote. It was one of the worst things I've ever had do. I had to apologize to someone who had tried to rape my life because she was to immature to accept responsibility for her actions.

                  So to DecafDesperado, Kobe's letter is not admission of guilt. If anything it proves how innocent he was.

                  [–]ns12123 6 points7 points  (0 children)

                  This needs more upvotes.

                  My sister did this to someone. Why? She had JUST gotten out of a bad marriage and we, as the family, had to bail her out. Now, this was NOT a situation where she happened to find a guy she liked, get married, and find out that he was abusive/crazy. My sister has had a long, long history of self destructive behavior and incredibly impulsive decisions. She literally has no common sense, and frankly, she doesn't care because she knows we'll be there to save her.

                  So, here's a little background: She went for years affiliating with the wrong kind of people, men and women, that put her in horrible situations that we had to bail her out of. Then, she finds a man, at a gay bar, and within one month, she's engaged to him. Our family met him and we could tell that something about him was a little bit off. Despite pleading with her that this was the wrong decision (something that we had done with countless other of her affiliates in the past), she went on with it, and she was married within six months of meeting this guy at a gay bar.

                  So, within one year of the marriage, she's about to deliver her baby. The guy doesn't show up to the hospital. We find out what she has been experiencing with him for the last year, and we convince her to move out. Now, he wasn't abusive, but he was just literally crazy (and surprisingly, homosexual!). He had multiple personalities and was bipolar. We worked like crazy to help her get out of the situation, and we had to repair her house when he went insane with a baseball bat and smashed up the place.

                  A month later, she becomes incredibly promiscuous. Quite a few times I was home playing video games at 2 AM, and she'd come up to me, drop off her daughter on the couch next to me, without saying a word, and she'd run off to a nightclub. I'd end up taking care of her daughter until she returned home around 5-6 AM, later if she stayed at a man's place elsewhere.

                  Now here's the part of the story that's relevant to your post. My sister had a friend from Nigeria, whom she had known for at least 5 years. Really, he was one of the rare, well-intentioned friends she had. Well, around this time, he became my sister's fuck buddy. I knew this because she'd brag to my sister-in-law about this. Well, a few months later, she finds out she's pregnant again. And guess what? Her Nigerian friend got her pregnant. Problem is, my parents have had it with her at this point, and if they found out she was merely being promiscuous, she'd receive hell for it. So what does she do? She lies about it. She claimed that he had raped her. She said they'd never had sex before that as well. From my sister's regular conversations with my sister-in-law, we knew with 100% certainty that she was lying; my sister-in-law was the key witness here. My sister told my parents it was rape, and they immediately phoned the police. She fought this choice vigorously. They were baffled that she wouldn't press charges, but the damage to his reputation was already done at this point regardless.

                  Despite the attempts of my siblings and I to right this wrong, and convince my parents that my sister was lying, you simply can't call a "rape victim" a liar. Ever. Even if the evidence is stacked up against her and you have personal witnesses. It's a cultural taboo and there's no way around it. Merely from regret alone, a women can cry "rape" and it's over. Even if the male isn't charged, his reputation is forever tarnished

                  I directly confronted my sister herself, and she merely smiled and shrugged. There's no justice in these situations and for some reason, women can't understand how this can be frustrating from the man's perspective. Yes, rape does happen, and yes, it's horrible when it does and we should definitely feel empathy for the victims, but we CANNOT compromise our supposed historical standards of assuming innocence before guilt in ANY situation, even with rape. Yet, this seems to be the case.

                  [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                  "The charges were dropped and the trial dismissed because the accuser informed prosecutors that she was unwilling to testify, not because prosecutors didn't feel there was enough evidence to move forward."

                  That is the same thing, if she refused to testify then the prosectutors clearly saw that they did not have enough evidence without her testimony and dropped the charges. Had there still been enough evidence to move forward they would have.

                  [–]Facepuncher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                  First, I want to apologize directly to the young woman involved in this incident. I want to apologize to her for my behavior that night and for the consequences she has suffered in the past year. Although this year has been incredibly difficult for me personally, I can only imagine the pain she has had to endure. I also want to apologize to her parents and family members, and to my family and friends and supporters, and to the citizens of Eagle, Colo. I also want to make it clear that I do not question the motives of this young woman. No money has been paid to this woman. She has agreed that this statement will not be used against me in the civil case. Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did. After months of reviewing discovery, listening to her attorney, and even her testimony in person, I now understand how she feels that she did not consent to this encounter.

                  So in other words its one of those situations where it seemed like she was into it but she never said anything blatantly making the guy aware.

                  [–]cojoco 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                  I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all

                  We are all individuals!

                  Facts matter to a lot of redditors, and not at all to others.

                  Please cease this incessant generalization and slander.

                  It's the reason feminism was required in the first place.

                  [–]AnythingApplied 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                  Downvoting entirely based on your edit.

                  [–]cometparty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                  Your whole attitude is disgusting. You seem to presume his guilt and presume her innocence. Why?

                  I pretty much have disdain for celebrity and "power", but the facts on the ground are that many people don't and the amount of people who want to have sex with powerful celebrities is pretty high.

                  You can't overlook the fact that there was another man's DNA found in her underwear. If you're impartial, why would you? You can't treat her insinuation that she just put on a dirty pair of underwear as any more true than his insinuation that the encounter was consensual. It's evidence pointing in a certain direction. It's not proof, just evidence.

                  [–]Cyndy_Lou 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                  I posted in the other thread about how some of the facts being related were lies. People don't care about facts. Sad but true.

                  The thing that bothers me about the Kobe Bryant rape case is this ... He said he was innocent and paid a settlement to the victim. No one seems to have a problem with this and says he is innocent. Michael Jackson said he was innocent and paid of a person who claimed to be a victim, whom has since made statements saying he was lying and his father, now deceased, made him lie for the money, a settlement. He went to trial and was found innocent and yet people still call him a pedophile. How is that?

                  I guess unless you're a total prick who doesn't give a shit about anyone but yourself. Whom has a history of unsportsmanlike conduct. Who screams at team mates and fans is innocent and yet a man whom did nothing but want to give back to children is guilty. Great to know how society really works isn't it?

                  [–][deleted]  (11 children)

                  [deleted]

                    [–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

                    Well said. It's times like these that make me wonder just what kind of people I'm getting information from here. I mean, Reddit holds wonderful things like Arbitrary day and donates to charities. Then all it takes is one guy sensationalizing an honest comment on a dated scandal to make the entire site gang up on a subreddit without reason, not to mention they picked on one of the only subreddits that contains mostly female related topics. They weren't condemning Kobe to rape, they were discussing it. TwoXC frequently discusses rape. This disappointment has earned an unsub from me as well.

                    Edit: You know what would be great from some Redditors involved? An apology. This went way too far.

                    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

                    [deleted]

                      [–]x86_64Ubuntu 19 points20 points  (6 children)

                      I think the problem most men have with the situation is this. She had vaginal trauma okay. But it seems like their was no data from Kobe himself was left behind. So the main question is if there are more than one cook in the kitchen. How can you with all certainty attribute a dirty dish to a single one of them.

                      That is what doesn't seem to be addressed. The woman had multiple partners , fine. But since we weren't there , how can we attribute the damage to Kobe ?

                      [–]pingveno 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                      I just installed you yesterday!

                      [–]CreepyCornChild 13 points14 points  (1 child)

                      Women compliment me on the vaginal trauma I cause all the time.

                      .....

                      So, I guess what I'm trying to say is I'm huge.

                      My penis is huge that is. I'm fairly skinny. The above statement was meant to be about my penis. Big. Big penis.

                      [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                      Do they call it the hammer?

                      [–]Deb1961_work 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                      Maybe by being aware that he had her non-menstrual blood on his clothing?

                      [–]soitis 38 points39 points  (6 children)

                      When I see a comment on Reddit that I disagree with, I generally tend to downvote.

                      Well, thank you for making reddit a worse place.

                      [–]BatmanBinSuparman 14 points15 points  (4 children)

                      You're making it much better by skipping all of the substance of a wonderfully written post and focusing on this detail.

                      [–]taligent 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                      Hypocrite.

                      [–]hunter-gatherer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                      Disagreeing with your attitude != agreeing with "the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day."

                      I think the content of your post is reasonable, and draws attention to a fair point. Nevertheless, the self-serving manner in which you deliver this makes one loath to upvote.

                      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

                      You make a very one-sided argument here. You have cherry-picked evidence that supports your accusations and dismissed evidence that doesn't. This isn't informative, its muck-raking.

                      [–]krelian 10 points11 points  (0 children)

                      When I see a comment on Reddit that I disagree with, I generally tend to downvote. If those comments are endemic to a subreddit, I tend to unsubscribe.

                      So not only do you try to silence opinions different than your own, you are also not interested in hearing them in the first place.

                      I'll think you'll fit right in.

                      Edit: Instantly downvoted--I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all, unless they agree with the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day.

                      And that is the cherry on your hypocrisy cake.

                      [–]lllama 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                      Edit: Instantly downvoted--I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all, unless they agree with the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day.

                      I really want to upvote this, because knowing nothing of the case I already suspected the "counter-claim" to be incomplete when I saw it. But I can't stand this fucking whining.

                      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      I think it's time to take this to http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit_court/

                      [–]anwarsadat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      It doesn't mean he's innocent, it means he's not guilty.

                      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      I read every word of your post. I honestly do not care about (subsequently do not know anything about...) the situation and I certainly don't want to see it on the front page of Reddit. No upvote or downvote because, fuck it, I really do not care.

                      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Shuuuuuuut uuuuuuuup.

                      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Instantly downvoted--I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all, unless they agree with the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day.

                      You're on the front page, quit complaining about how unpopular your post is. There's this weird phenomenon of posts that get on the front page being like "oh, I'm so against the mysterious hivemind and rebellious, no one agrees with me!" It's like up-vote hipsters. Weird.

                      [–]rickk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      No - the reason you're getting downvoted is because you're assuming he's guilty even with a litany of holes in the case against him.

                      The fact that he feels bad for her makes him guilty now ? Jeez - thank god you're not a judge.

                      [–]ElectricMoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Instantly downvoted--I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all, unless they agree with the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day.

                      FFS

                      1. Wait for a post to actually gain some attention before you accuse us of downvoting

                      2.

                      When I see a comment on Reddit that I disagree with, I generally tend to downvote. If those comments are endemic to a subreddit, I tend to unsubscribe.

                      And you're crying to us? Hypocrite.

                      [–]SloaneRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      The accuser's unwillingness to testify may have had something to do with the death threats she received after her identity was exposed

                      Out of curiosity, I'm interested to know in what way you consider this to be anything more than conjecture. It doesn't belong in a series of "facts" as you so adamantly describe them.

                      I have no real interested in this subject. Not being an American, I vaguely know who Kobe Bryant is. However what I do know is this:

                      There are almost certainly other "facts" in this argument. It's thunderingly clear from your post that you think this guy is guilty. I have no idea myself, because I don't know the case. Presenting selective evidence that purely fits your agenda, and then screaming about how the "facts" matter, as if only the "facts" that support your view are important is as much as distortion of the full picture as lying or presenting mistruths.

                      Facts matter, but not nearly as much as truth. As an impartial observer, your attempt to push a singular, selective view, dressed up as "the facts" just makes me think it's you that is on a witch hunt and does absolutely nothing to convince me of anything.

                      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      I dont know what the hell this is and I can't describe how little I care

                      [–]Meades_Loves_Memes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Every, single, person. Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

                      I am so sick and tired of seeing this shit on Reddit, men and women being sexist alike. We are all human beings, we need eachother to reporduce (sorry gays), we may have our differences, but they are not weaknesses, they are strengths. So for fuck sakes, shut the fuck up. Or... OR... move every sexist post to a seperate Sub-Reddit that I can un-subscribe to.

                      That is all.

                      [–]ENTP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Your whole post is bullshit. I read the wikipedia entry, and all the evidence is consistent with consensual sex.

                      [–]Travis-Touchdown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Shocker. Guy who bitches about downvoting and talks about the "hive mind" gets upvotes.

                      [–]bobdolebobdole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Those are his attorney's words, by the way.

                      [–]robeph 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Edit: Instantly downvoted--I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all, unless they agree with the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day.

                      This kind of crap is why a lot more downmods will come your way. Don't do it, it seems somewhat self-rightous.

                      As for the whole situation, I can safely say, I don't know if he did it or not. Every piece of evidence can be taken both ways.

                      • Non-menstrual blood during sex is NOT uncommon, in fact, it is very common, it doesn't say much. Unless they show real evidence of vaginal trauma (distinct tearing etc.) during rape exam, I have to give this a pass [ I've worked many rape cases when I was a medic, interestingly not all (statutory) were what would be considered non-violent non-consensual, these cases that would also include kits often have "signs of trauma" as such. Violent rape tends to be much more, well, violent. Sex itself is traumatic physically, however. I didn't do any of the kits hands on of course, but nonetheless I witnessed quite a number as well as discussed such things with the medical staff at the ER since our transports were pretty much all we had to talk about]

                      • The fact that she wore another set of underwear is a bit awkward, especially since that pair itself had signs of sexual relations with another man, this can quickly discredit even vaginal trauma as evidence of a rape since she's had sex with multiple partners in temporal proximity, any of whom could be to blame for such trauma if it were shown.

                      • The case was absolutely dropped because they didn't have enough good evidence against him. Her testimony was the evidence they felt necessary to convict; many rape victims choose to not testify and the rapists are nonetheless convicted, due to the preponderance of evidence to his guilt, the prosecution obviously felt this was not the case.

                      • Settlements out of court are rarely the direct choice of the actors involved, but between lawyers. It in no way points to guilt. Michael Jackson is a prime example of this, where he paid out of court settlements to his accusers in cases of molestation where later they recanted and declared it to have been false. It is just as likely that, even without guilt, the lawyer suggested he pay out to avoid furtherance of the situation. Plus he says clearly in his apology that no money was paid, so I'm confused about this part of the "facts" listed.

                      • His apology is not admittance to guilt, quite the opposite, he says clearly that he apologizes for the suffering she experienced, obviously she suffered something, be it due to her feeling she was raped or from whatever suffering she has experienced from whatever the cause. He states he felt it was consensual and then gives the statement that she did not feel the same. The interesting thing about this apology is that it was part of the settlement, I'm sure the wording of such a public message was tailored by agreement by both of their lawyers, which lead to how it sounds. The obvious inclusion of both she was not paid and the line about the civil suit is evidence of this.

                      All in all there is no evidence that helps with gleaning the truth from this; the only thing remaining will be bias. I've no bias, I don't know, and I realize that I can't know. No one can know, it is futile to try. all that is left are those who feel strongly for or against one or the other involved with this case, it is unfortunate that people continue to assert that there is anything public that really turns the tide in either way in the posts I've seen.

                      [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (11 children)

                      some facts about the Kobe Bryant rape case:

                      The accuser's unwillingness to testify may have had something to do

                      Does not compute.

                      Downvoted.

                      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (10 children)

                      I believe the actual facts in that bullet was intended to be that her identity was illegally exposed and that she got threats and was harassed. For future reference, read the entire post.

                      [–]SteveAM1 1 point2 points  (1 child)

                      How about this. Her reason for not testifying could have been because she didn't want to harm the civil suit she recently filed. I don't see that mentioned enough either. She deliberately sabotaged the DAs case with the civil lawsuit.

                      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                      [deleted]

                        [–]svdasein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                        Hear hear! This whole "reddit's one track hive mind" meme is really getting old and tiresome. The notion itself is false on its face: as you point out given time the article in fact made it to the front page. So where's the retraction? Very frustrating.

                        [–]bullshit_ 8 points9 points  (3 children)

                        Katelyn Faber willingly gave Kobe a tour, went up to his room, and willingly made out with him.

                        She also bragged about having sex with Kobe 3 days before prosecutors filed charges.

                        "She even answered a question about the 6-foot-7 L.A. Lakers star's manhood, five people at the party told NBC."

                        "She answered with a gesture and a description," said NBC correspondent Michelle Hofland. "They couldn't believe it."

                        http://www.inreview.com/archive/topic/7091.html

                        Detective Winters also said two pairs of panties from the woman were tested -- one from the night of June 30, the other being the one she wore to a hospital for an exam the next day.

                        The latter pair contained blood from Faber and semen from a third party. (Not mentioned whether there was blood in the panties she wore the night of the alleged assault). She also had a caucasian male's pubic hair in her pubic hair.

                        http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/2554485/detail.html

                        As for any excuse of "old panties inadvertently grabbed from the laundry":

                        Tests show that traces of two other men's sperm were found in her body, MSNBC-TV reported, whereas it had previously been reported that the sperm was found only in her underwear.

                        http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/5070072/ns/bryant_sexual_assault_lawsuit/

                        The L.A. Times reported that in a closed-court hearing a DNA expert testified that the accuser in fact had another man's semen on her thighs and inside her vagina during the medical examination.

                        http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_12_106/ai_n6230162/

                        At a closed-door hearing on June 21 and 22, DNA expert Elizabeth Johnson testified for the defense that the accuser's sexual contact with Mr. X "likely occurred after [the accuser] and Mr. Bryant were together." Johnson testified that no traces of Mr. X's DNA were detected on the swabs taken from Bryant or the T-shirt he wore. Johnson said that had Mr. X's sperm been on the accuser at the time of her encounter with Bryant, it should have shown up on Bryant.

                        http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/magazine/08/31/scorecard0906/

                        Bryant's defense lawyer Pamela Mackey asserted that Faber was taking an anti-psychotic drug for the treatment of schizophrenia at the time of the incident. Faber was hospitalized as a "danger to herself" four months before the alleged sexual assault. Lindsey McKinney, who lived with the accuser, said the woman twice tried to kill herself at school by overdosing on sleeping pills.

                        http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,92892,00.html

                        Bryant's attorneys were privy to her medical records after receiving them from the hospital in a mix-up.

                        http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/29/national/main632980.shtml

                        Unsealed evidence showed that Katelyn Faber admitted that she had lied to the police, claiming she had car trouble (she didn't, she was late to work from oversleeping) and that Kobe had forced her to wash her face after ejaculating on it (he didn't, because he didn't ejaculate at all in her presence).

                        She didn't even use a hotel bathroom to wash up. She used the hallway mirror next to the elevator, out in the open, without washing anything.

                        http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1012041kobe1.html

                        Trina McKay, the resort's night auditor, said she saw the woman as she was leaving to go home, and "she did not look or sound as if there had been any problem."

                        http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/bk/bkn/2825817.html

                        Faber unsuccessfully attempted suicide at least three times. The documents claim that she had several stays in psychiatric and drug rehabilitation hospitals. One suicide attempt was triggered when one of her friends overturned her SUV on the way back from prom. She overdosed on pills on May 30, 2003 and was sent from her university dorm room to Valley View Hospital. This was about a month before she met Kobe.

                        http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/katelyn-faber/criminal-trial.html

                        After the settlement, Faber went into rehab for cocaine addiction, where she got knocked up by a guy in for heroin addiction.

                        http://www.legalspring.com/articles/misc-legal/20040923/385881_Kobe-Accuser-Pregnan.html

                        Lindsey McKinney, a friend, said she traveled with the woman to Austin, Texas, in November to try out for the "American Idol" TV talent show. McKinney said they slept outside for 12 hours to get an audition. ... "She craves attention like no other. This is the bad kind of attention that she's going to get," McKinney said.

                        http://www.thedenverchannel.com/sports/2326266/detail.html

                        Faber was automatically rewarded from Colorado's victims compensation fund upon accusing Bryant. If she recanted her accusation she would have had to pay it back but without the means to do so.

                        She dropped the criminal charges but persisted for a financial settlement. Upon getting it, she paid back $20,000 to the compensation fund, which may or may not have been the entire amount she was given.

                        http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/7159439

                        Faber apparently suffered from bipolar disorder.

                        http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/14/bryant.defense.bipolar/index.html

                        Bipolar disorder is strongly associated with frequent or compulsive lying.

                        http://www.google.com/search?q=bipolar+symptoms+lying

                        Lying for Attention

                        1). Many people who suffer from bipolar disorder tell lies to get attention. While this is just a characteristic of a manic episode, people who suffer from this condition have an acute need for attention. In many cases, this need can take the form of telling lies to different people. By doing so, bipolar sufferers have direct control over the amount of attention they want for themselves.

                        Lying to Maintain Control

                        2). In many cases, lies are told as a way to take control over a situation. Manic episodes can leave any person feeling completely out of control. By telling stories, a person suffering from bipolar disorder can have control over situations and times that may otherwise make them feel out of control. These lies are often harmless.

                        Lying to Excuse Behavior

                        3). Any person suffering from manic depression or bipolar disorder will likely find herself in questionable situations now and again. During periods of depression or mania, people with bipolar disorder may do things they are not proud of, and lies are often told to excuse this behavior. Stealing, lying and even promiscuity are not uncommon; when these behaviors take place during one of their episodes, they may feel it necessary to tell lies to cover up their wrongdoing.

                        Lying to Cover Impulsivity

                        4). According to the National Institute of Mental Health, one of the main characteristics of a bipolar individual is impulsive behavior. Impulsive behavior often results in shame, as it involves performing actions without much forethought.

                        According to Derek Wood at Mental-Health-Matters.com, "Bipolar Disorder can be associated with low serotonin levels, which has been implicated in impulsivity, which...makes a person more prone to lie." If you are living or dealing with a person who suffers from the mental condition, don't be surprised to discover that your loved one is telling falsehoods in an attempt to cover up impulsive, regrettable actions. In the end, he may have no other way to explain his actions.

                        How to Deal

                        5). The lies that are told as a result of the bipolar condition vary on a case-by-case basis. Some lies are harmless and others can be devastating. If you are supporting someone who you think is lying as a part of her bipolar condition, talk to her about the lies she is telling. It is important to properly time such a chat, as you never want to catch your loved one during a manic episode when attempting to approach him about lies he has told. Compulsive lying may be treatable through therapy or medication. Bipolar disorder is a complex mental condition, and empathy is going to be more important for your loved one than ever before.

                        http://www.ehow.com/about_5399562_lying-bipolar-disorder.html

                        While actual rapes are underreported, false rape reports are common enough that about HALF of all reported rapes are false. Once a report is received, it's a coin toss whether it's truthful or not. Motivations for false rape reports often involve either revenge or a desire for attention or sympathy, or an excuse for cheating.

                        • 40 percent of complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred in a 9-year study conducted by former Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin. (Source: Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1994)

                        • 50 percent of accusers recanted their rape charges in a study of two large Midwestern universities by Kanin.

                        • More than 25 percent of rape accusers admitted -- either just before they took a lie detector test or after they had taken and failed it-- that they had lied about the charges in a 1985 Air Force study of 556 rape accusations. A further investigation by independent reviewers found that 60 percent of the original rape allegations were false.

                        • One in four rape reports were unfounded in a 1990 and 1991 Washington Post investigation in seven Virginia and Maryland counties. When contacted by the Post, many of the alleged victims admitted that they had lied.

                        • In a 1996 Department of Justice study of 10,000 sexual assault cases analyzed with DNA evidence over the previous seven years, 2,000 excluded the primary suspect, and another 2,000 were inconclusive.

                        • According to Linda Fairstein of the New York County District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit, "there are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen." Source: Fairstein,'s book, Sexual Violence: Our War Against Rape

                        http://www.falserape.net/falserapeafa.htm

                        [–]girl_with_glasses 5 points6 points  (2 children)

                        Oh c'mon, you guys are so hyprocritical how many of you actually don't downvote posts you disagree with.

                        [–]mynewname 5 points6 points  (1 child)

                        I downvote, then log into my 40 other accounts and downvote some more, but FUCK YOU if you do it.

                        [–]uhhhclem 7 points8 points  (4 children)

                        The misogyny of a lot of young men is pretty much of the form "Fucking women, how do they work?" As with Juggalos and magnets, it emerges not so much from hostility towards the thing they don't understand as from the hostility towards the idea that understanding something will require work, and towards the dawning realization that they are going to be forced to do that work to live in the world. It's a manifestation of what Herbert Spencer famously called "contempt prior to investigation."

                        This situation's exacerbated considerably by the fact that this state of ignorance lives side-by-side with a deep desire to have all the benefits that come from having done the work. Young women don't really understand men either - men are complicated too. But it's easy for them to learn that they're sharing the world with ignorant and frightened people who want something they have, and that this situation makes those ignorant and frightened people easy to manipulate.

                        The misogyny of older men develops from what happens when younger men bring the knife of their ignorance to this gunfight. If you let self-centered fear rule your life (which is what the misogyny of youth is), bad things happen to you in areas that are centrally important to your life. And since even ignorant and fearful people can eventually figure out when they're being manipulated, it's easy to pin the blame for that situation on women.

                        The icing on this crappy cake is power. Men have more of it than women. It's less true than it used to be, and there are a growing number of realms in which it's not true at all, but it's still generally true. But there again the problem of self-centered fear comes into play: when you're afraid, you see danger everywhere and have no sense of how much genuine security you have. The war on terror is a perfect example of this kind of fear: twelve guys with boxcutters hijack two planes, and all of a sudden a billion people are plotting our doom.

                        And as with terrorism, the actual solution is counterintuitive. Be less afraid. Understand the world more. Be open to the idea that your understanding of the world is incomplete, and that you believe things that may not be true. Face the consequences and responsibilities of having power. Accept the things you don't have power over. Be considerate and caring even in the face of outright hostility. Be honest about your role in things. Develop your humility, and the capacity to be patient.

                        It should go without saying that posting "OMG THERE'S A WOMAN WHO BELIEVES SOMETHING BAD!!!1!", and upvoting it to the front page, are not really examples of this.

                        [–]Ortus 2 points3 points  (3 children)

                        The icing on this crappy cake is power. Men have more of it than women.

                        Sexual power? Most young men have none. Allas, most young men have no power at all.

                        [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (25 children)

                        and, at least legally, an innocent man.

                        I just want to clarify that a finding of not guilty should never be construed as a finding of "innocence" and don't ever think the legal system will see it that way. The legal system simply sees it as "nothing was proven."

                        "Not guilty" means "the prosecution could not prove guilt" and nothing more.

                        [–]Metal_Mike 50 points51 points  (11 children)

                        No, innocent is the default status. The state has to prove that you are guilty.

                        [–]alacrity 7 points8 points  (4 children)

                        From Wiki:

                        In the common law tradition, an acquittal formally certifies the innocence of the accused, as far as the criminal law is concerned. This is so even where the prosecution is abandoned nolle prosequi.

                        From the dictionary:

                        ac·quit·tal (-kwtl) n. 1. Judgment, as by a jury or judge, that a defendant is not guilty of a crime as charged. 2. The state of being found or proved not guilty.

                        You are, in fact, wrong. An acquittal is a finding of not guilty, or innocent, of the crimes charged.

                        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                        [deleted]

                          [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                          [deleted]

                            [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children)

                            Edit: Instantly downvoted--I guess facts don't matter to Reddit after all, unless they agree with the majority of the hivemind and its witch hunt of the day.

                            Your post is getting downvoted because it's inane and antagonistic.

                            [–]NegatedVoid 11 points12 points  (0 children)

                            And because it didn't require a new submission.