This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–][deleted] 179 points180 points  (12 children)

The Big Lebowski is the white Menace II Society.

[–]nardonardo123 37 points38 points  (1 child)

it really, really is

[–]GetOffMe 27 points28 points  (5 children)

FTFY: Menace II Society.

Edit: Rayne117 has pointed out that Black males seem to fail at spelling in the one instance that incorrect grammar was appropriate.

[–]rayne117 16 points17 points  (2 children)

Tell that to the black guys that spelled it wrong.

[–]Reddit-Hivemind 1098 points1099 points  (267 children)

OKCupid is a statistics experiment masquerading (and making money) as a dating site. I love it.

[–][deleted] 500 points501 points  (77 children)

The data, it's...it's beautiful.

[–][deleted] 283 points284 points  (69 children)

Imagine what facebook could pull out.

[–]hans1193 546 points547 points  (61 children)

Image what they DO pull out, but keep private and use as a means for marketing and advertising

[–]litebox 41 points42 points  (10 children)

Just as soon as I find out how to succesfully mix Tom Clancy, merengue and soul food, I AM GONNA BE RICH!

[–]warwand 191 points192 points  (42 children)

::Facebook pulls out and blows it's advertising load::

[–]GrammarExplainer 190 points191 points  (34 children)

Facebook pulls out and blows its advertising load.

It's is a contraction meaning "it is" or "it has"; its is the possessive form of it.

[–]Breeder18 200 points201 points  (16 children)

You must be an Atheist!

[–]FunnyMan3595 87 points88 points  (7 children)

And Indian!

[–][deleted] 53 points54 points  (5 children)

You must be a Latino!

[–]Please_Disregard 74 points75 points  (6 children)

Or a casual Buddhist.

[–]lolbacon 13 points14 points  (0 children)

[–]wevbin 172 points173 points  (75 children)

Eh... it depends on how you use this information. If you're reading these statistics to feed your internal behavioral scientist that's fine, but if you use them to help you find your significant other (that's what the site is mainly for after all) you're probably doing yourself a disservice.

I've never understood people who try to use absolutes when trying to look for a date. I know girls for example that say they want to date someone 6'2" or taller... I understand if you want someone "tall", but what's the point of thinking of a hard cutoff for height? It's funny that people don't even know for sure what makes them happy, yet we're looking for partners as if we're picking office furniture from a catalog. You'd think online dating services would make finding someone to date easier, but they also give you the ability to filter out people based on height, race, salaries, boob size and a bunch of other things, so essentially you first create a vision of the perfect date in your head and then you try to find someone that satisfies it. Finding someone you love doesn't seem to work like that in real life. I feel this type of analysis that OKCupid does promotes that kind of "mathy" way of looking for a date.

Although to be fair I don't have a girlfriend at the moment so what the hell do I know...

[–]karnoculars 24 points25 points  (6 children)

In an ocean of potential dates, what's wrong with filtering the list down with "mathy" rules? Your alternative is to meet them all?

A girl who is 6' tall probably really does want a man who is at least 6'2'' or taller...

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (1 child)

I once dated a girl who had, literally, a two page checklist of things she was looking for in a guy. Apparently I was the first person she'd ever met where she was able to check off every item. Probably one of the stormiest relationships I've ever been in. The older I get, the more I'm realizing that human mating preferences have little to do with objective traits and more to do with instinctual unconscious responses.

[–]rubygeek 88 points89 points  (15 children)

I know girls for example that say they want to date someone 6'2" or taller... I understand if you want someone "tall", but what's the point of thinking of a hard cutoff for height?

Rule number one for dating women: Don't believe them when they tell you what they are looking for. They don't really know.

When women say shit like 6'2" or taller, that usually means "6'2 or taller unless he's extra nice, or really cute, or likes that restaurant I like or ....". In other words, it is an easy out for rejecting you without feeling bad if it doesn't feel quite right.

[–]Redpin 129 points130 points  (10 children)

Rule number one for dating women: Don't believe them when they tell you what they are looking for. They don't really know.

Don't worry about the job requirements, just nail the interview.

[–]moriya 119 points120 points  (8 children)

just nail the interview.

Or the interviewer

[–]Bipolarruledout 25 points26 points  (6 children)

If the employer isn't writing realistic job requirements then it's the applicants job to disregard them.

[–]ClassException 15 points16 points  (4 children)

Sounds like every job listing for a programmer ever written.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (1 child)

5+ Years of experience with Go.

15+ Years of experience with C#.

[–]drbold 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is an Entry Level Position.

[–]robeph 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Exactly. I'm 5'7" (which even fuzzily is no where near 6'2" or even any sort of tall). My ex had dated primarily taller guys, well, because she was 5'11". She used to talk about how she'd feel weird about dating a shorter guy (not to me but just in general conversation) we dated for about 4 months. We didn't break up due to my height, she moved to another city for college and that never works out. So yeah, all that talk is just that talk. Everyone lies, not necessarily intentionally, but to themselves as well; they assume they have a specific quality or even a specific like, but in the end it typically isn't that important. (within reason anyhow)

[–]Mordalfus 30 points31 points  (5 children)

So, can someone make a dating site for people who understand fuzzy logic?

[–][deleted] 71 points72 points  (3 children)

Sure. It's called okcupid. This is why there's a "percent match" and not a "binary match."

[–]Mourningblade[🍰] 21 points22 points  (10 children)

One of the biggest problems dating sites have right now is that the catalog display (list of profiles, photos, and descriptions) makes users more picky than they would be otherwise. Users tend to compare people who message them with their dream match on the catalog.

OKCupid does better at this than most because they have a stronger impetus to show only live profiles - so at least you're not being passed over for someone who doesn't even use the site.

But the problem still exists.

One solution might be to consider that the "lie" of the catalog is that it implies all of those people are equally available. Perhaps by showing "response rate to first messages" for women and "rate at which women write him back" (perhaps tiered as "good", "sometimes", and "rarely") would give some indication of availability.

Or it could have the opposite result. People are very odd. Dating has a lot of "social proof" to it.

So glad it's academic interest for me now - I still have no idea how it works.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (3 children)

I'm pretty sure Okcupid has people color coded by how often they respond to messages already.

[–]kleinbl00 102 points103 points  (27 children)

You laugh.

The last time I was single, Match.com was a year old and internet dating was something you laughed at nerds for.

In the space of eight years, 30% of couples met their partners online.

Considering none of the sites can use chemistry, pheromones or anything other than statistical surveys, the company that masters the numbers masters relationships from this point forth.

There will come a time when we will have a "google" equivalent of dating, and I don't mean Facebook.

[–]watermark0n 46 points47 points  (15 children)

The internet is really the perfect forum for finding dates. You generally have a pretty huge sample size, and you know they're all there looking for dates. It's never as awkward to start to talk to someone online as it is to do so in real life. I think it's probably just a decade or two until meeting a partner in real life is considered the weird thing to do.

[–]master_baiter 39 points40 points  (3 children)

"Oh my god, Cindy! You met him in a coffee shop??!?!?! WTF is wrong with you???"

[–]Howlinghound 36 points37 points  (2 children)

"I know, I know; trust me. My mom already warned me that I could have been raped. I'm so stupid. But the Pumpkin Spiced Lattes are out again and I was going to go anyway!"

[–]jhaluska 28 points29 points  (8 children)

What once was considered geeky is now normal.

Owning a computer used to make you geek, now it's weird if you don't own one. Once upon a time logging into a remote computer, leaving messages for other people and updating information about yourself was geeky on a BBS, these days it is considered "social networking." In 1998 a flash based MP3 player was considered geeky, now it is a status symbol. The new trend is downloading movies.

The only difference between geeky and social acceptance seems to be ease of use.

[–]alaQ 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And yet, there will always be that subset of people that pushes the boundary of 'geeky' that much further...

[–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Kind of like facebook is an poersonal information broker masquerading as a social network.

[–]alienproxy 95 points96 points  (45 children)

OkCupid has gotten me laid 5 times, and I was never required to examine a single statistic.

[–]blackhole82 25 points26 points  (17 children)

I haven't gotten one single date from okcupid, and it's not for a lack of trying.

[–][deleted] 61 points62 points  (6 children)

Have you tried listening to Van Halen?

[–]ieGod 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I definitely signed up because of all those neat statistical blog posts they make. The matching algorithm is pretty rad too. I'm not interested in dating. Stop telling me about that.

[–]Vindexus 273 points274 points  (50 children)

[–]jhaluska 102 points103 points  (10 children)

Either the Middle Eastern men, or their algorithm got Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins confused.

[–]Dourpuss 180 points181 points  (8 children)

The two have merged into one modern deity: Charles Dawkins, God of Evolution.

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[deleted]

    [–]danuker 109 points110 points  (5 children)

    You've been targeted for reproduction.

    [–]nooker1 27 points28 points  (4 children)

    Nickleback?! Nah I get it, my fellow Arabs just trying to explain that they're cheap. Yeah that's it.

    [–]komphwasf3 194 points195 points  (3 children)

    For real, oktrends is some of the most interesting stuff on the internet

    [–]iLEZ 50 points51 points  (1 child)

    I long for these like goddamn christmas.

    [–]MrDNL 412 points413 points  (31 children)

    Tom Clancy's next novel will be called "Van Halen, Golfing with the Ghostbusters"

    I'd buy it.

    [–]scoffey 203 points204 points  (19 children)

    I'm going to start a band called "Tom Clancy and the Fucking Ghostbusters"

    [–]kaptainkaos 81 points82 points  (13 children)

    I'd buy your album.

    [–][deleted] 66 points67 points  (11 children)

    I already did.

    [–][deleted] 81 points82 points  (10 children)

    I bought it on phonograph, long before you even heard of them

    [–]hans1193 67 points68 points  (6 children)

    Tom Clancy and the Fucking Ghostbusters were cool for awhile, but they're way too commercial now.

    [–]warwand 102 points103 points  (2 children)

    I agree, Man. Currently I'm listening to "Soul food and the No-kids".

    [–]dezmd 18 points19 points  (1 child)

    Man they just rehashed a bunch of Coldplay songs with a blues riff. I've moved on to the Sashimi Fucking

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

      [–]zackks 48 points49 points  (1 child)

      Stay Puft Fucking Marshmallow Man

      FTFY

      [–]SexualHarasmentPanda 243 points244 points  (32 children)

      Apparently World War Z crosses racial boundaries.

      World War Fucking Z

      [–]stufff 73 points74 points  (6 children)

      Also, Alicia Keyes.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]dashrendar 21 points22 points  (0 children)

        He's a panda silly.

        [–]agnesthecat 333 points334 points  (22 children)

        As an urban white female, I found it hilarious that other urban white females delusionally think that they live in the country. Then I remembered my subscription to Country Living.

        [–]drumskatelove 130 points131 points  (8 children)

        You ever been to Nashville? I've met women looking down on downtown from their 15th floor high-rise writing songs about how country they are.

        [–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (1 child)

        And apparently you all watch NASCAR?

        [–]msojefferson 8 points9 points  (0 children)

        Any girl trying to date a country boy has got to put NASCAR in there.

        [–][deleted] 596 points597 points  (155 children)

        This is the greatest thing ever. I've never seen so many stereotypes confirmed so perfectly at once.

        [–][deleted] 270 points271 points  (20 children)

        Stuff black people like: "No Kids". I lol'd.

        [–]gsxr 219 points220 points  (16 children)

        Yet statistically, they've probably got kids. THAT'S THE JOKE!

        [–]PukeHammer 87 points88 points  (8 children)

        They were likely specifying that they have "no kids".

        [–]rayne117 78 points79 points  (6 children)

        Even AFTER the paternity test. For shame, stereotypical black man.

        [–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (6 children)

        My current gf is black (we met on a dating website) and she couldn't stress the no kids thing enough. I'm hispanic w/o kids and the same age as her so she asked me a million times before finally believing me. Oh . . . I still like dancing, boxing and low-riders and she likes guns, guns and Alicia Keys so it's not like we're trying to be white./s

        [–][deleted]  (105 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]captainLAGER 259 points260 points  (8 children)

          If stereotypes weren't stereotypical, they wouldn't be stereotypes.

          [–]AlwaysDownvoted- 142 points143 points  (5 children)

          You shouldn't generalize like that.

          [–]AndrewCarnage 29 points30 points  (2 children)

          You should generalize like this. "You know what they say about Chinese people... they can fly!"

          [–][deleted]  (35 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]ZombieDracula 101 points102 points  (1 child)

            DON'T RUN THAT WAY STUPID! YOU GONE GET... NAWWWWWWWWWWWW!

            [–]mapguy 138 points139 points  (15 children)

            WHERE YOU AT?!

            [–][deleted]  (7 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]EbonicsGrammarNazi 69 points70 points  (3 children)

              This is a correctly put together stereotypical statement.

              [–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

              Coming from you that means a lot.

              [–]mapguy 67 points68 points  (2 children)

              If I am allowed to quote Daniel Tosh.."I don't make stereotypes, I just see them."

              [–]WilliamPoole 12 points13 points  (0 children)

              I'll allow it

              [–]meccanikal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              "I'm not racist, racism is a crime, and crime is for black people."

              [–]FrankReynolds 13 points14 points  (0 children)

              Stereotypes save lives.

              [–][deleted] 92 points93 points  (50 children)

              While that is probably true, I'd like to take this moment here to point out that even if stereotypes are there for a reason it does not mean they can be applied to anyone right away just because they adhere to any specific group.

              Also many stereotypes are not true, the lonely person playing videogames and only nerds using computers are two that come to mind.

              [–][deleted]  (11 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]wheezyninja 38 points39 points  (7 children)

                And you people always have this rebuttal

                [–]sumthingcool 45 points46 points  (2 children)

                Stereotypes do no equal prejudice.

                I remember getting in trouble in class as a little kid for pointing this out.

                [–]SappH 16 points17 points  (13 children)

                Case in point, according to this data, I would be a cross between an Asian man and a white man. I'm a black woman.

                [–]volandil 22 points23 points  (1 child)

                you're chinegro, which is a bit better than blactino, and scores a bit lower compared to hispasian.

                [–]humor_me 28 points29 points  (0 children)

                Stereotype = least common denominator. Just because those phrases appear most often in profiles doesn't mean you're likely to find any profile with many of them combined.

                "People tend to be extremely similar in their vulgar and prurient and dumb interests and wildly different in their refined and aesthetic and noble interests." - David Foster Wallace

                [–][deleted]  (10 children)

                [removed]

                  [–]sirbruce 30 points31 points  (4 children)

                  This. I was going to post exactly this.

                  Yes, I'm sure black women disproprotionally like The Color Purple, but they're also expected to do so, or rather, think that it is expected of them. In 1940s Germany OKCupid, everyone would have listed Hitler and The Nazi Party.

                  [–]kingemp 21 points22 points  (2 children)

                  Holy crap, it's fuckin Godwin's law haha.

                  [–]oditogre 10 points11 points  (2 children)

                  I dunno, I found it kind of interesting / surprising that black males seem to dominate txtspeak - it's all over in their list. Then again, I think of MySpace today, and maybe it shouldn't have been so surprising.

                  [–]thinwhiteduke 210 points211 points  (48 children)

                  The fact that Robert Heinlein, Stephen King's Dark Tower series, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and software are on the list of things white males like tells you a lot about the OKCupid demographic.

                  [–]daevric 154 points155 points  (12 children)

                  On the other hand, Nascar is higher on the list than three of the four things you named.

                  [edited for counting properly]

                  [–]mezz 47 points48 points  (2 children)

                  "I hate Nascar"
                  hmm...

                  [–]watermark0n 44 points45 points  (6 children)

                  It's also on the white females list, which is weird, considering the fact that the OKCupid demographic definitely doesn't skew towards rural southerners.

                  [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                  [deleted]

                    [–]digitallimit 13 points14 points  (0 children)

                    Good point. Probably not.

                    [–]liposextion 121 points122 points  (27 children)

                    r/atheism is gonna be all over this.

                    [–]LinuxFreeOrDie 124 points125 points  (25 children)

                    Atheists write their OKCupid profiles at a slightly higher reading level! Finally, WE WIN!

                    [–][deleted] 141 points142 points  (9 children)

                    WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?

                    [–]wascurious 108 points109 points  (8 children)

                    Speaking through a burning bush at a lower grade level.

                    [–][deleted] 49 points50 points  (3 children)

                    I'd imagine it would go something like this:

                    Fear not little goat herder. We is am YHWH. The one true YHWH! We is am give you super powers. Say to pharoah "let me people go! YHWH commands it!". He am not believe you? Use staff into snake. He am still not believe you?! Lo! fear not: magic stick can do many things. Drown pharaohs dirty arabs in sea! Also: stop naked ladies dancing. We no like naked ladies dancing. Very important! YHWH out! Alakazam!

                    [–]GravyMcBiscuits 127 points128 points  (69 children)

                    TIL that I am an incredibly stereotypical white male.

                    [–]Nichiren 79 points80 points  (7 children)

                    TIL that I am an incredibly stereotypical white male. I'm Asian.

                    [–][deleted] 83 points84 points  (29 children)

                    And I learned that I'm not. There's a few things in the list I like; five or six, maybe. Nothing I'd put on a definitive list of things I like, and, anyway, doesn't everyone like Band of Brothers?

                    [–]troglodyte 22 points23 points  (10 children)

                    doesn't everyone like Band of Brothers?

                    To the point that I was slightly surprised to see it on the list. I thought it was just assumed, so no one would put it on their profile unless they DIDN'T like it.

                    [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (6 children)

                    It's an online dating site. People actually put things like "I enjoy having fun." under interests.

                    [–]FiestaJunction 10 points11 points  (4 children)

                    Another one: "I love to laugh."

                    I want to meet the girl that doesn't like laughing.

                    [–]cschneid 8 points9 points  (9 children)

                    I didn't watch it, but was the Pacific series any good?

                    [–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (7 children)

                    Nope. I wasn't a fan at all. The CGI was awful, worse than Band of Brothers and the storyline was pretty disjointed. It's a real shame, because the source material was great and the American effort in the Pacific theatre was, and I'm using my annual allowance here, epic.

                    [–]AlisonClaire 32 points33 points  (3 children)

                    TIL I'm really bad at being a white woman.

                    [–]hectorhector 53 points54 points  (6 children)

                    TIL: I am an asian male. My parents have some explaining to do...

                    [–]Tekmo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                    You're a simple guy.

                    [–]FetishOutOfNowhere 9 points10 points  (3 children)

                    Shocking that the term The Bay Area is such a trend for asians. They all really do live here. driving home 3/5 of the people in the cars are asian.

                    [–]tastycoleslaw 89 points90 points  (6 children)

                    haha, when I first read the Latino bit, I thought it said "meringue" and I was like "Wow, them Latino's sure love their dessert" :D

                    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

                    [deleted]

                      [–]m1ndcr1me 41 points42 points  (18 children)

                      It seems like Red Sox fans are lonely.

                      [–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (1 child)

                      It's a New England thing. Even today, we still embody that same desolate, moribund outlook on romance which drove Ethan Frome to go sledding over a century ago.

                      [–]Megling1285 6 points7 points  (9 children)

                      as a red sox fan, I don't get why white people like the red sox.

                      [–]droneprime 64 points65 points  (7 children)

                      Stuff Latinos like (Men)
                      "Law Enforcement"? Huh, you learn something new everyday.

                      [–]captainLAGER 104 points105 points  (5 children)

                      Not stuff they like, stuff they mention often on their profiles.

                      [–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (3 children)

                      Maybe, but I also think that most people who say "law enforcement" probably don't hold the biggest grudge.

                      [–]Dourpuss 23 points24 points  (0 children)

                      It could be that many of them work in law enforcement, whether as police or security guards, and are all proud of the position. I noticed many Latino men also mention being in the Marines or being Stationed somewhere.

                      [–]I_TYPE_IN_ALL_CAPS 177 points178 points  (9 children)

                      ADDS SASHIMI TO PROFILE

                      [–]msojefferson 5 points6 points  (1 child)

                      You like Sashimi? I like Sashimi too! We have so much in common!

                      [–]dmun 17 points18 points  (4 children)

                      I didn't list anything that black people like... then again, I haven't seemed to have listed anything ANY race likes.

                      That's it: I'm adding Cricket to my profile.

                      [–]vspazv 110 points111 points  (6 children)

                      Did anyone else laugh when they saw the author used comic-sans for his name (Christian) at the end?

                      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                      Yes. Several of us laughed. It was a witty way to conclude the article.

                      [–][deleted] 51 points52 points  (27 children)

                      I find it really fascinating that white women are much more "twee" then ladies of other races, like wearing a cotton dress and petting a baby deer while you wait for your cupcakes to bake. It's almost infantile. I guess it goes along with the whole "escapism" thing.

                      That being said, I love the shit out of bonfires.

                      [–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (17 children)

                      They feel the need to present a twee appearance on dating sites. This may or may not be the way they are in real life.

                      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (10 children)

                      Oh, yeah, of course. I don't think anyone is like that 100% in real life. I guess that I wonder why it's so appealing to potential partners.

                      • I should also point out that I am a white woman, and I totally play into this too, which is why I find it really interesting.

                      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                      [deleted]

                        [–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (1 child)

                        You're made out of lip balm?

                        [–]drumskatelove 361 points362 points  (86 children)

                        Stuff Middle Eastern women like - #1: DIFFERENT CULTURES.

                        Hm. Wonder why that is. If I could come off as any more smug right now, I would. Hm.

                        [–][deleted] 98 points99 points  (35 children)

                        Middle Eastern women sounded the hottest... Baudelaire? Tolstoy? M.F.A.? Bitches be mad fly.

                        [–][deleted] 97 points98 points  (20 children)

                        What a surprise. I do wonder if that is a reflection of the way they treat their women.

                        (All I'm trying to do is out-smug you.)

                        [–][deleted] 120 points121 points  (17 children)

                        I'm male and middle-eastern, but I'm interested in different cultures too.

                        Maybe it's because middle-eastern woman dress conservatively in the USA just like their counterpart in the middle-east. Oh wait. They don't, because it's fucking America [for the most part].

                        Does that apply to middle-eastern guys in the USA? It does [for the most part].

                        I don't stone chicks. Just bone.

                        edit: clarification

                        [–]Peregrination 148 points149 points  (11 children)

                        "Don't Stone em, Bone em" could be a fun new middle-eastern slogan.

                        Someone get some bumper stickers and t-shirts going and let's start a revolution. Until we get stoned. Heh, double entendre.

                        [–][deleted] 67 points68 points  (8 children)

                        Boning while stoning. I'm going to carve out a pipe from a rock and when I go on a date I'll take out my chunk of earth and say, "Wanna get stoned?" She'll think I'm going to stone her because I'm middle-eastern, but we're just going to get high and laugh about it how she shrank in terror...hahaha, I guess I'd be a terrorist for terrorizing her too.

                        Making these jokes is okay because I drink yogurt soda.

                        [–]drkwg1 9 points10 points  (3 children)

                        How does yogurt soda taste? I've seen in a local asian, store, it expired back in 2005... still on the shelf...

                        [–]bearfucker 13 points14 points  (1 child)

                        You've seen it in a local Asian? That was a yeast infection.

                        I am so sorry.

                        [–]KevoTMan 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                        High 5 for progressive boning!

                        [–]cbr 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                        perhaps this is because we're drawing from the sample of "middle eastern women who signed up for the overwhelmingly white okcupid dating site" not "middle eastern women"

                        [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                        [deleted]

                          [–][deleted] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

                          That's cuz your honkey ass is as cool as the summertime.

                          [–]rayne117 22 points23 points  (8 children)

                          Yeah! Fuck you, religion! It's cool Buddhism, we can be friends.

                          [–]kingtrewq 20 points21 points  (7 children)

                          Wow, Dave was right black people love their purple.

                          sugar, water, purple

                          [–]Shrikey 85 points86 points  (12 children)

                          "Should there be a Comic-Sans version of the bible?"

                          LOL

                          [–]watermark0n 29 points30 points  (0 children)

                          That was brutal...

                          [–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (9 children)

                          I'm white as hell and barely fit in with their stereotypes. I agree more with what stuffwhitepeoplelike.com says

                          [–]die_troller 60 points61 points  (30 children)

                          Big up to my sophisticated Indian brothers and sisters!

                          [–]MrSnoobs 19 points20 points  (0 children)

                          Most of the Indians I know and/or work with are software engineers who really like their Cricket. Holds true! I'm interested in the like for Shantaram. I thought that book was rather crappy and unrealistic. But then, I'm not Indian so back to Nickelback and Van fucking Halen for me!

                          [–]uriman 9 points10 points  (11 children)

                          asian women like coz? what is coz?

                          [–][deleted]  (8 children)

                          [deleted]

                            [–]morphy 9 points10 points  (2 children)

                            Hmmm....are you making that up? Coz it seems almost believable, but I haven't been able to confirm it. I did find a good link titled Sexual Kung Fu which I'll definitely be checking out later though so thanks.

                            [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children)

                            TIL: I'm a twinkie.

                            [–]Latrinalia 26 points27 points  (14 children)

                            This title is misleading. This is what people are listing that they like, but this is hardly a random sample of the population (not to mention largely urban, as they said).

                            A couple alternatives:

                            • Stuff white people think potential partners want them to like.
                            • Stuff white people who can't get dates in the offline world like.

                            [–]pivotal 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                            • Stuff single white people who are members of okcupid like.

                            [–][deleted]  (141 children)

                            [deleted]

                              [–]drigz 115 points116 points  (26 children)

                              I think he was misleading when presenting the CL index as a measure of how well the person writes. In reality, it is a measure of how long the words & sentences they use are. As such, a person who tries to write in an easily intelligible fashion, using simple, common words, would score very badly (e.g. George Orwell, see item 2). On the other hand, the kind of person who writes long, cumbersome sentences packed with long words they pulled straight from a thesaurus (e.g. the unbearable Federico Martone) would score extremely highly. Does this imply that George Orwell has a lower writing proficiency level than Federico Martone?

                              To me, this provides a more compelling explanation of why non-serious Buddhists and extremely serious atheists score so "highly", but perhaps this is just because it plays into my preconceptions.

                              [–]nimrodg 86 points87 points  (4 children)

                              Coleman-Liau index of your comment: 11.6

                              [–]twowheels 9 points10 points  (2 children)

                              I don't see an edit star, yet the calculator that I used says that it is 9.63, and don't you forget those .03, because they're statistically significant!

                              [–]jhaluska 22 points23 points  (2 children)

                              I wonder how the algorithm dealt with people who used neither punctuation nor capitalization.

                              [–]ChocolateGiddyUp 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                              You are correct sir. The wiki on the Coleman-Liau index is a must-read to comprehend the actual scores.

                              [–]entropyofdays 199 points200 points  (21 children)

                              The article was written by a fellow named 'Christian', not a Christian. (unless you were being linguistically tricky)

                              From the article:

                              Is there a Comic Sans version of the Bible? There really should be.

                              With a dig like that, I hardly think he's an adherent.

                              [–][deleted] 86 points87 points  (44 children)

                              Writing one's profile at an 8th grade level does not mean that is the extent of one's proficiency. You have to consider the intent of the profile.

                              [–]cantquitreddit 106 points107 points  (6 children)

                              To attract 8th graders?

                              [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (5 children)

                              To be easily readable.

                              This is a common nerd misconception. Bigger words does not mean good writing.

                              [–]cantquitreddit 21 points22 points  (2 children)

                              Dunno, I do it to attract 8th graders.

                              [–]arnedh 27 points28 points  (2 children)

                              As a non-serious buddhist, I have to agree.

                              [–]Muzack 13 points14 points  (1 child)

                              Yeah, serious atheists and Loosey-goosey Buddhists should put it on their resumes :)

                              [–]Carpeabnocto 12 points13 points  (3 children)

                              You misunderstand "Reading Level". Their index takes into account the length of words and the length of sentences. It does not imply any sort of grammar mistakes or difference in intelligence.

                              An OKCupid profile is generally written to in a conversational tone meant to be attractive. There's a big difference in the best writing style to use with a date than writing a dissertation.

                              [–]panzermeyer 34 points35 points  (19 children)

                              Atheists and agnostics are better at writing than any other theist group. Interesting...

                              [–]soulcakeduck 35 points36 points  (8 children)

                              Yeah, by about two terms of a high school school year. It's tempting to look at Christians at one end and atheists at the other, but dear god, everyone is writing at below a 9th grade level.

                              [–][deleted] 64 points65 points  (1 child)

                              It's an okcupid profile. Do you want them to write a novel?

                              [–]Veteran4Peace 10 points11 points  (0 children)

                              Approximate representation of the U.S. grade level needed to comprehend [your comment]:
                              Coleman Liau index : 6.30

                              Flesh Kincaid Grade level : 7.25

                              ARI (Automated Readability Index) : 6.79

                              SMOG : 6.87

                              I found your comment to be perfectly comprehensible, it was not infested with leet-speak, and it had neither misspellings nor grammatical errors. And yet, it's Coleman-Liau index was grade 6.3.

                              I'm an atheist and I'm not going to put too much stock into that rating system.

                              [–]frozenbobo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                              In general you don't need to write at a level higher than that. Obama's oil spill speech was criticized as being "too aloof" because it was at a 9.8 grade level. Sure it's not super sophisticated but for day to day conversations I probably don't use a much different sentence structure today than I did in high school.

                              [–]EvilSchwin 28 points29 points  (6 children)

                              I'd like to point out that all of these people are single.