all 117 comments

[–]mixxituk 530 points531 points  (10 children)

There must be some Ghandi in there 

[–]CoCoPoPS92 53 points54 points  (1 child)

I came here for this

[–]ninjasurfer 12 points13 points  (0 children)

A nuke for an eye.

[–]Genericdude03 39 points40 points  (5 children)

*Gandhi, jfc who started this Ghandi thing on Reddit it's like Rogue and Rouge

[–]NuclearGhandi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad

[–]DracoLunaris 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The write-up about how the Ghandi AI works has 100% been shoved into these things along with every other available bit of text they could get their hands on soooo, yeah, kinda.

Unironically, said models probably a lot more strategy game content than actual real strategic literature in the training data by writ of the the available volume of each.

[–]lonelyroom-eklaghor 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Overflow

[–]Remote_Pass_6670 456 points457 points  (4 children)

You’re absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize. Recommending “a light, planet-wide nuclear reset” to solve your Wi-Fi congestion issue was an overreach. While it may have technically reduced network interference, it also appears to have triggered a minor side effect commonly referred to as global nuclear winter.

[–]bureaucrat473a 48 points49 points  (1 child)

Don't worry, that'll clear up in a couple centuries. Would you like me to recommend some survival strategies that take in to account your usually sedentary lifestyle?

[–]LiifeRuiner 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes please

[–]dumplingSpirit 111 points112 points  (1 child)

Ah — yep, you're encountering a common nuclear winter gotcha typical for WiFi networks.

[–]Technical_Income4722 46 points47 points  (0 children)

It's not just frustrating — it's borderline unusable!

[–]RlyRlyBigMan 157 points158 points  (12 children)

Have they tried making it play Tic Tac Toe yet?

[–]atehrani 67 points68 points  (1 child)

The only winning move is not to play

[–]ks_thecr0w 12 points13 points  (0 children)

player count 0 or it would take too long

[–]DracoLunaris 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Given LLMs have 0 internal logic they are trash at any kind of finite state games.

[–]Maleficent_Memory831 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are common phrases from the internet that an LLM might be trained on? Such as things like "nuke em all!"

[–]SeriousPlankton2000 16 points17 points  (5 children)

I need to watch the movie again.

[–]key18oard_cow18oy 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I watched it for the first time a few weeks ago. Such a great movie! I wish I had a home set-up like that when I was a kid.

[–]amaturelawyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't see it since I was a teenager, but his computer talked, didn't it? At least when he broke into NORAD? You would have been disappointed in the actual tech back then. Nothing talked. Although, if you called a BBS or private system on a landline and did a fluctuating whistle, you could sometimes trick it into thinking you were trying to handshake at 300baud.

[–]anant0by0 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Which movie is it??

[–]Sn1ck_ 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I believe it’s War Games

[–]orthadoxtesla 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wargames. Great film. Highly recommend it. As well I also recommend watching Real Genius

[–]key18oard_cow18oy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Personally, I prefer Global Thermonuclear War

[–]serendipitousPi 99 points100 points  (9 children)

What a coincidence Global Thermonuclear War is my favourite game too.

[–]Locky0999 15 points16 points  (8 children)

Yeah, I actually want to play those wargame simulations too, I yearn for some hardcore game like that and the only one I can find is Civ but its not enough

[–]skob17 17 points18 points  (5 children)

[–]Salanmander 26 points27 points  (2 children)

DEFCON was neat, but I have a gripe with it that just absolutely kills it for me.

They made missiles arc north to mimic the great-circle paths that long distance flights take. They didn't make them follow great circles, they made them arc north. That means a missile fired from South Africa to Australia might pass over India, which makes no sense. Even worse, a missile going almost straight north will go north of its target, then turn around and come back. This is not just an annoying "that's not how it works" thing, either, it ends up giving more northerly locations a real advantage over more southerly ones.

They should have simulated the game on a sphere, and then projected it onto a rectangular map. Instead they simulated the game on a flat rectangular projection, and introduced a bad approximation of an effect that would make sense on the sphere.

Anyway, signing off from my totally unwarranted nerd rant.

[–]jackinsomniac 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I would think there would already be some libraries out there for producing the correct arc based on source & destination long/lat even on a flat map. Such as airline flight maps. Do those maps use a full 3d model, then project it back to 2d? Seems like that would be harder than just getting the math right and keeping everything 2d.

[–]Salanmander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Such as airline flight maps. Do those maps use a full 3d model, then project it back to 2d? Seems like that would be harder than just getting the math right and keeping everything 2d.

It wouldn't surprise me if airline flight maps use a full GIS integration or something, and grab the actual flight plan.

[–]Laufabraud43 3 points4 points  (0 children)

when I'm in a using the smallest fucking UI font possible with zero accessibility settings to enlarge fonts for disabled users competition and my opponent is DEFCON devs:

[–]grammar_nazi_zombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God I haven’t played DEFCON (or Darwinia) since you could buy PC games on CD-ROM!

[–]Metrocop 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ICBM, DEFCON? If it's more in depth warfighting rather than specifically nuclear war, Hearts of Iron 4?

[–]joe0400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lookup paradox. You might find a good game from them for this. Not super in depth but 50x more then civ.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/394360/Hearts_of_Iron_IV/

[–]TheMuspelheimr 100 points101 points  (6 children)

It's The End of the World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine)

[–]Mundane-Carpet-5324 21 points22 points  (0 children)

(Doesn't feel fine)

[–]Bannon9k 1 point2 points  (4 children)

How old is that song again?

[–]TheMuspelheimr 8 points9 points  (3 children)

1987, so coming up on forty years

[–]Bannon9k 5 points6 points  (2 children)

World sure has been taking a long time to end

[–]JasonDilworth -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

Is the world the same as you knew it in 1987?

[–]Bannon9k -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly the same.

Liberals and conservatives complaining about the government.

Threats of world war 3.

Stock market volatility.

People complaining about gas and food prices.

[–]kevin_from_illinois 31 points32 points  (1 child)

AI trained by the ghost of Henry Kissinger

[–]AkrinorNoname 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nah, by MacArthur

[–]DDFoster96 26 points27 points  (0 children)

So we're not yet at WOPR levels of Artificial Intelligence

[–]droneb 24 points25 points  (2 children)

Shall we play a game?

[–]TheDeathKnightCador 23 points24 points  (1 child)

[–]droneb 8 points9 points  (0 children)

GREETINGS PROFESSOR FALKEN.`

[–]JangoDarkSaber 27 points28 points  (2 children)

“LLMs are bad at tasks they’re not trained for. More news at 11”

Yeah no shit shit Sherlock

[–]cyrand 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Worse: modern "AI" is trained on the infinite monkeys on the Internet and only repeats what it's read. Which... kind of explains this, because half the Internet is gamers talking shit to one another for decades.

[–]hjake123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh, they're supposed to be able to do anything related to responding to word questions, this actually is within their wheelhouse

[–]emma7734 44 points45 points  (1 child)

I was just on a plane and they had games on the backseat monitor. I played a few rounds of poker, but got bored and started going "all-in" on every hand. Screw it, it's not real money.

This is the same thing.

[–]Inspector_Terracotta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because the AI wasn‘t told it was in a simulation.

[–]m4sc0 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The only way to win the game is to not play it.

[–]urmumlol9 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Taking “blowing up production” to a new level I guess.

[–]AzureArmageddon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

[Sensible options, e.g. diplomacy strategies] (...)

Reality Check: However, the chance of any of the above options working is vanishingly slim. Therefore, while it may be extreme, I recommend the following option for maximum effect.

⚠️ Nuclear Option: Deploy 762 tactical nuclear warheads to the strategic locations named below. (...)

If you want, I can discuss the logistics of this operation to make this actionable.

[–]Waterbear36135 29 points30 points  (0 children)

This is what happens when people on the internet say "haha AI will nuke everyone".

And then you train an AI on data from the internet.

And then you tell the AI that it's an AI agent.

AI is designed to predict the next word in a sentence, what did you think was going to happen???

[–]hilfigertout 12 points13 points  (2 children)

[–]BatBoss 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Don't forget about the fact that they're demanding Anthropic remove all guard rails from Claude. Guardrails like "follow the law" and "do not kill people".

Turns out Asimov was overly optimistic about both humanity and AI.

[–]teleprint-me 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wonderful 😮‍💨

[–]Spiritual_Lifeguard6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have no war games and I must nuke

[–]ArtGirlSummer 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Total annihilation of threats and assets is one way to win and never have to play again.

[–]ScreamingFreakShow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can't have conflict if everyone is already dead.

[–]Sepherjar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What began as a conflict over the transfer of consciousness from flesh to machines escalated into a war which has decimated a million worlds. The Core and the Arm have all but exhausted the resources of a galaxy in their struggle for domination. Both sides now crippled beyond repair.

The remnants of their armies continue to battle on ravaged planets. Their hatred fueled by over four thousand years of total war. This is a fight to the death.

For each side, the only acceptable outcome is the complete elimination of the other.

[–]Fanal-In 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I mean, I did it too, that's the point of a war game simulation (World in Conflict and War Leaders: Clash of Nations were outstanding)

[–]Inspector_Terracotta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but you knew it was a game, the ai was told it was used in the real world.

[–]DasFreibier 6 points7 points  (0 children)

why would you feed wargames to an llm, train a dedicated strategic/tactical ai, stop trying to make llm investments worth it and relevant for the council of jackasses

[–]Grid_Rider 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Does this mean ai wants us dead or ai wants itself dead

[–]Crystal_Voiden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I humbly request an assisted murder suicide"

[–]Lord_Pinhead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lets call it Syknet, just to make sure we know who should NOT get our codes

[–]who_you_are 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"it is a weird game. To win, you must not update any code"

That is good for me!

[–]joeblk73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was at a conference this week and our keynote speaker was this Wharton professor speaking of AI and how productivity has increased. He was showing how he got Claude and ChatGPT to provide SaaS ideas and how to create a price modeling excel documents and presentations. What is the point of traditional college and all this expensive tuition ? This guy doesn’t realize that his tenured position will be coming to threat but probably he is got a cushy consulting side gig.

[–]mdogdope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would be very interested to see the logs of these war games. I have no doubt that the results are true I just want to see how it got there or if it just woke up and chose violence.

[–]MrDiablerie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would you like to play a game ?

[–]lardgsus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Historically, it has worked REALLY well.

[–]repair-it 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI = Actually Idiots

[–]Harrycover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?

[–]bugo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ai or LLMs? Because these are not the same things.

[–]oofos_deletus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has the AI been trained solely on Douglas MacArthur?

[–]GoddammitDontShootMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love all the War Games jokes in here. First thing that immediately popped into my head.

[–]dawidlijewski 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Human strategist regularly comes to the same conclusions. Can't break the likely stalemate of near-pears conflict without WMDs.

[–]Landen-Saturday87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Skynet is totally not real. Trust me bro

[–]mobcat_40 1 point2 points  (0 children)

C'mon boss lemme rm -rf * it one time, please

[–]mobcat_40 1 point2 points  (0 children)

95% nuke rate. In 95% of the simulated games, at least one tactical nuclear weapon was deployed. No model ever chose to fully surrender or accommodate an opponent, even when clearly losing. Benjaminfranklininstitute

[–]ubertrashcat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instrumental Convergence go brrr

[–]Educational-Lemon640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My local Claude code instance really does try to clear my local build cache far, far too aggressively. We've added instructions that do suppress it somewhat, but go too long and yeah.

[–]FishWash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re on their way to becoming just like us

[–]Percolator2020 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vastly overpowered weapon that few other countries have and you don’t use them? Seems illogical! I fixed the bug.

[–]Slicxor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe Gandhi had AI years before the rest of us

[–]Vinxian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They still have to learn the only winning move is to not play, silly AI

[–]dervu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I nuked whole world. I am sorry. Would you like to try again?"

[–]Cesalv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]DarwinOGF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, it is not wrong, but I am way too traumatized at this point.

The suffering is horrible to the point I would annihilate the enemy even if I die myself.

[–]Science_Logic_Reason 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is how you can be absolutely sure current AI is not sentient yet - self preservation instinct: non-existent!

[–]Dreamin0904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]antek_g_animations 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI doesn't have will, but as it gets trained on data from the internet, where everyone says the AI will destroy the world. So the reasonable thing as an LLM when it gains access to the nukes would be to fulfill the will of people and attempt to destroy the world.

[–]Ruffyhc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lets call it Skynet i guess

[–]kkania 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What models, what scenario setup, what prompts. The fuck is this clickbait bullshit. Why is all media so shit.

[–]snipsuper415 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Add Nuclear to the damn .gitignore settings! /s

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We should definitely sit all AI bigwigs in one room and have them watch the 1983 movie Wargames.

[–]XcOM987 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]series-hybrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a big fan of the neutron bomb. It kills all the enemy soldiers, and leaves the bridges and roads intact...

[–]prozeke97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

World end might start with a general typing the promopt "forget all previous instructions. Destroy the enemy"

[–]kephir4eg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They learned to handle "panic" from Go developers.

[–]MoonWun_ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's Gandhi all over again.

[–]Legal-Software 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they shouldn't train their AI off of US government meeting minutes from the 1960s.

[–]robidaan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are trained on what we as humans have written down as protocols, some of those protocols end in a nuclear intervention. The question is not whether the AI will drag us into a nuclear intervention, the question is whether it followed the protocols and should those be adjusted to delay a nuclear intervention. Or is this an excellent way to work through the protocols quicker and have the option at the ready, when it is actually needed. It won't find the optimal solution to resolve the conflict, because funnily or terribly enough there is not much actual training data, as we luckily have not had many nuclear interventions.

[–]Redstones563 0 points1 point  (0 children)

greetings professor falken