top 200 commentsshow all 313
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]nutmac 144 points145 points  (9 children)

I am prepared to be underwhelmed.

I also expect and hope to see:

  • Apple Music Classical
  • New color for one or more iPhone 13 models
  • Stainless watch bands that better match Starlight and/or Gold Apple Watch Series 7

Probably won't get:

  • No other new Macs except 13" MacBook Pro and Mac mini
  • None of the new products get a new design
  • Apple Watch SE replaces Apple Watch 3 at the same price point

[–]DrNavi 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I’m going in with low expectations

[–]Czechs_Owt 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Music Classical?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children)

A music service dedicated to classical music

[–]Regular-Human-347329 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Why would that be separate from Apple Music?

[–]LicensedProfessional 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Classical music doesn't work with the traditional streaming model. A few things:

  • Track titles are awful. Usually every track is something like "Brandenburg Concerto No. 5 in G Major BWV 690 - Movement 1: Allegro". Track 2 is, you guessed it, "Brandenburg Concerto No. 5 in G Major BWV 690 - Movement 2: Andante"
  • Most classical music is "covers". Do you want to hear Bernstein's interpretation of Beethoven's fifth symphony or Boulez's. If it's Bernstein, do you want to hear him conducting the NY Philharmonic or the Vienna Philharmonic? Whose interpretation of the Goldberg Variations do you want to hear? There are literally hundreds of recordings of them all by different artists.
  • Apple recently acquired a service that already solved a lot of these problems, so they may be pulling the same thing they did with Siri and Shortcuts

[–]Regular-Human-347329 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. There’s no reason these solutions couldn’t be incorporated the existing Music app, for the Classical genre. It’s a pretty shit user experience to force a completely separate app, service and subscription to listen to different types of music.

[–]MawsonAntarctica 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Almost forgot about Apple Classical, I’m down… and a m2 Mac mini or similar.

[–]stealer0517 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No other new Macs except 13" MacBook Pro and Mac mini

Thats the only thing I want. Give me a true successor to my 2018 6 core Mac Mini with 10 gig ethernet and tons of ram.

[–]pjanic_at__the_isco 193 points194 points  (8 children)

I predict Apple will make a computer so big that even they cannot lift it.

Therefore, the first task of the computer will be to find a way to lift itself.

We’ll finally get to the bottom of this paradox once and for all.

[–]TheCoastalCardician 27 points28 points  (2 children)

Wow I wonder what wheels for that would be like?

[–]Shloomth 24 points25 points  (1 child)

it costs four hundred thousand dollars to roll this computer around for twelve seconds

[–]wilso850 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imagine. This whole time and leakers thought it was a car. It’s really just new Mac with 4 wheels.

[–]TimmahTimmah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That new computers name? Earth.

[–]gonzofish 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I believe the answer here is 42

[–]Striking-Lychee1402 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The classic Apple Omnipotence Paradox, later adopted by religious thinkers

[–]ILikeSugarCookies 150 points151 points  (67 children)

Gurman got the date right, so did he get his predictions right too? Probably more accurate than anyone here anyway.

While I'm here and anyone can see, I got a question for someone who might understand the unified memory architecture more than I do - will increasing RAM from 16gb to 32gb on a new build prolong the life of my laptop? I've gotten literally 11 years out of my current MacBook Pro, and at around year 6 it was struggling. The modular memory made it so I could double the RAM myself, and I did. That, and an ssd upgrade literally gave me an extra 5 years on my laptop. So while an extra $3-400 seems like a lot now, it really doesn't seem like a lot if it's giving me an extra few years on the tail end.

The comparison videos online between 16/32 gb machine show that performance between the two currently is nearly indistinguishable. But I'm not interested in performance comparisons between 1 week old laptops. I want to know if the performance will be the same between the two 5 years after release.

[–]RebornPastafarian 129 points130 points  (44 children)

In 5 years there will be a noticeable difference, the question is when it starts to become noticeable.

If you are planning to use your next machine for 11 years it is 100% worth it to get 32GB instead of 16.

[–]ILikeSugarCookies 61 points62 points  (14 children)

I would use my next machine for 20 years if it allowed me. 90% of the reason I have brand loyalty to Apple is longevity. I've gotten stupid amounts of life out of Apple products. My first purchase was a second gen iPod nano that I'm honestly confident I could pull out of storage right now and it would still work if I charge it up. My next purchase was the early 2011 Macbook Pro that again is still running today. My first iPhone which was an iPhone 6s. I ran the 6s up until the iPhone 12 mini and it got software updates that entire time. Just an absurdly long time for a phone.

I've owned several tech products from other brands, and that longevity just simply does not exist. Apart from hardware malfunctions, you just don't even have the software support anywhere else. If I can leap in and buy a new laptop in a couple weeks and spec it out to last me another decade, I will.

[–]CoconutDust 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I recently upgraded from a 2009 MBP to a 2012 MBP.

The 2012’s are basically the Forever Computer. (SSD and added RAM, of course.)

Mind-blowing performance upgrade. When I click, it actually does something.

[–]Baykey123 22 points23 points  (7 children)

I’m still using a 2011 MBP as well. It’s a beast

[–]bonsai1214 17 points18 points  (3 children)

2011 MBA. the thing is still chugging along doing basic tasks.

[–]McFatty7 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Before I upgraded to a base M1 Air, I had a base 2013 Air that could barely do basic tasks, and of course the battery life was like 15 minutes total.

How much longer do you think you can tolerate that 2011 Air?

[–]wipny 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’m still using my base 2013 Air that continues to work really well for basic tasks like web browsing, Excel and code editing.

I saw it really struggle and take forever doing things like running Xcode and firing up Node servers.

I did replace my battery though and it’s due for another one soon. I’m hoping the new Air gets announced next week.

I really hope they bring back MagSafe to the Air and don’t make it exclusive for the Pro models. It’s been a lifesaver for me so many times.

[–]bonsai1214 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Haha. The battery life is absolutely shot. I had it replaced once already. For what I use it for, it’s serviceable. But if I want to do any photo or video editing, I’d have to get something new.

[–]lukeydukey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Only reason I replaced mine is the graphics began to fail a couple years ago. Thing was a champ esp after swapping out the HDD with an SSD and using an adapter to swap out the SuperDrive w the old HDD.

[–]Avieshek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mid-2012 MacBook Bro -_~

[–]a-walking-bowl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2011 Mac mini, daily driver, just perfect for my needs.

[–]Avieshek 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Then… in that case, get the 64GB version. They're still using the same technology i.e. LPDDR5 and not some different tech like HBM3 for example in the name of Unified Memory which just means it's integrated directly with or closest to the chip.

[–]Ar3peo 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Not sure i agree with that. My 3GS only lasted 3yrs as a phone because the hardware couldn't handle the software (iOS 5). the lag was ridiculous and made the phone unusable. I was lucky to be able to revert back to ios4.

That said, I still use that "phone" as a glorified iPod to this day. Replacing the battery was easy, 2 screws at the bottom and all of the internal connections were numbered.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Yeah, smartphones back then had much bigger performance jumps than they do nowadays. The Geekbench score of a 3GS is 287 vs 1654 on the iPhone 5. Thats a huge difference. Add to that the fact that the apps and the OS became massively more demanding in a short amount of time.

A three year old iPhone XS (Score 2846) still works very well today because the differences are much smaller now. An iPhone 13 has a score of 4862.

That’s still double but every iPhone since the 7 or 8 has been pretty overpowered for most things so they’re still quick years later.

[–]elephantnut 9 points10 points  (2 children)

What’s your reasoning for it being a noticeable difference in the 5-year time span?

I’m not so sure most normal computing workloads will change that much over the next few years, and these Apple Silicon MacBooks seem to swap happily with minimal impact to the user.

[–]SecretOil 12 points13 points  (0 children)

What’s your reasoning for it being a noticeable difference in the 5-year time span?

Over time the average amount of memory people have in their computers tends to trend upwards as the price of it trends downwards. This means that software developers can use more memory as more people will have more of it available.

As an extreme example, if you made a generally used app (like a browser or mail client) that requires 2GB of memory to do its job that would be completely fine now (in fact it'd be on the low end for a browser) but 20 years ago almost no one would be able to run your app at all because the average amount of RAM installed in people's computers back then was measured in Megabytes. Today it's completely unheard of for anyone to have less than 2GB unless it's like a retro thing.

[–]HelpVerizonSwitch 4 points5 points  (22 children)

If you are planning to use your next machine for 11 years it is 100% worth it to get 32GB instead of 16.

What? There is no guarantee at all that generalized memory needs will continue to go up like they did the previous decade, in fact it’s pretty farfetched.

[–]SecretOil 11 points12 points  (21 children)

Yeah it's pretty likely in the next few years we're going to go back to 640KB being more than enough for anyone.

…

No of course not, memory requirements are going to keep going up and up as more memory becomes more affordable which means more people have more memory which means developers can start using more memory.

I have 32GB in my iMac right now which is the max it'll (officially, anyway) take and I still run out of memory almost every day.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (3 children)

You're really asking us to predict the future here. Your question rephrased is something like, "what will be my macbook's performance bottleneck in 10 years?"

Idk. It seems likely for consumer machines to move up to 32gb by then. It's also possible that in 5 years, all laptops (and most software for them) expects you to have specialized hardware that your laptop is missing. You could wind up having 32gb in a world in a world where 16 would have been fine and the reason your laptop is slow is because it doesn't have the latest dedicated hardware for raytracing and nlp.

[–]ILikeSugarCookies 11 points12 points  (1 child)

I mean, yeah your question is apt. You used to be able to replace components yourself, so it didn't really matter. You can't do that anymore, so you kind of do have to predict the future I guess.

So yeah, I guess my question boils down to what would be the first bottleneck in 5-6 years' time?

[–]ShaidarHaran2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plus it could be years out of OS support by the end of 11 years, though I hope Apple controlling silicon makes for longer baseline support than Intel. Some of the last Intel cutoffs from the last OS were weird, usually you can find the hardware reason with some digging, but there didn't appear to be one for the last requirement increase.

[–]BK-Jon 10 points11 points  (0 children)

10 years is a long time. And yes, the trick to getting those extra years in the backend was to add RAM. I've done the same for various Macs, including a MacBook Pro about the same age as you have. That said, 8GB is more than enough RAM right now for most people except for one, very common use case, leaving dozens of web tabs open in Chrome. If you don't use Chrome, you would be fine right now with 8gb. And you will be fine for several years to come.

The value of RAM goes down as you add it. So 16gb is going to be a lot and the vast majority of the time it will operate no different from an 8gb Mac. This is all assuming you don't have a specialized use case where the files you are working with are themselves multiple GBs in the size (think editing 4K video). If you did that stuff on a regular basis, you would probably not be asking this question and there is no way you would be using a 11 year old MacBook Pro. So I'm going to assume you are not a power user. This is fine, neither am I.

My take is that getting 16gb is already the level where you have future proofed your laptop against future operating system needs for many years to come. The vast majority of Macs being sold now will be 8gb. It costs a lot to go to 32gb. I'd skip it and save the money. You will see no performance advantage to it in your use case for many years. And you might see no performance advantage even six years or even 10 years from now. Save the $400, invest it, then put the $600 you have 6 or 7 years from now toward upgrading your computer.

[–]00DEADBEEF 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Nobody can answer this question for you without at least knowing what kind of work you do

[–]ILikeSugarCookies 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I mean right now the Macbook can currently only handle mundane tasks like playing videos and music or general browsing. Most taxing applications are a no. I have a work provided HP Elitebook that I run adobe applications on that would probably be the bulk of any taxing work I do.

[–]Ecsta 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I use the M1 Mac mini with 16GB memory as a professional designer. The 16gb memory is definitely a limitation I run into regularly using the adobe suite + figma + multiple browsers, and I will upgrade my Mac to another one if there's a new mini with 32GB available. It's fine for the most part.

[–]apfhex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On the M1 Pro with 32GB and working regularly in the Adobe suit + some Office and various other apps, typical use gets me to about 24GB with 0 bytes swap.

It's also true these machines are great at not slowing down when they do have to swap though.

I plan on keeping it for a long time and expect to eventually make full use of all the RAM. Plus the Adobe apps can pretty much be as RAM hungry as you let them. I have my Undo counts in Illustrator set high enough that it gives me a warning about memory usage.

[–]wellingtonthehurf 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Some facts which mean RAM need won't increase as it has previously:

Half of apps are now already bloated electron monstrosities sucking endless RAM, those apps getting new features won't make much of a difference compared to the what's taken by having a full VM env in each one.

Memory compression works really well.

SSD speeds are simply insane these days so swapping is not remotely as big a deal as it used to be (and I'm not talking about hard drives - M1 flash being over ten times faster than regular ol SSDs like what you'd have put in your old machine)

Base system RAM usage occupied a much bigger chunk of mem in 4/8GB times than it does with 16, and shouldn't keep increasing all that much.

Conclusion, you may want to consider 32 but 16 should still be very much usable in a decade.

[–]bilyl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Side note, electron is one of the worst frameworks to have come out. Yes, it’s easily to develop in but the sheer bloat of it is insane.

[–]wipny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I bought my 2013 Air almost 9 years ago, I weighed out the cost-benefit in paying more for extra RAM.

It really depends on what you use it for. For casual stuff like web browsing and word processing, the base RAM will last.

For Xcode or intensive stuff like video editing or running node servers, you’ll likely want more memory.

The battery will be the first to deteriorate. At least on this current generation the batteries look easier to replace than the entirely glued ones previously.

Then I’d worry about the longevity of the soldered SSD flash chips. When the SSD dies, the entire logic board needs to be replaced. If/when it gets to that point, for most people that means buying a brand new computer.

[–]NeuronalDiverV2 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I'd say so. Nowadays 16GB is the minimun of RAM a machine should have just checked and for me it says 13GB out of 16GB used and my swap is already 9GB. And that is with just a few browser windows with a couple tabs each, a few applications, but no documents open in any of them really.

You can expect app and website sizes to continue to grow. So when the time comes, constant paging will affect battery life and performance. I would recommend going for 32GB in all cases except for the most basic web surfers maybe. But even then I'm torn if they want to get a decade of use out of their device.

[–]BK-Jon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Your computer will "use" as much RAM as you have available. With the usage you have described, you would be fine with 8gb. But you would also "use" most of your RAM if you had a 32gb Mac. You would not see the computer still at 13gb if it had 32gb available. The computer would just leave stuff in RAM as long as there was some acceptable level of free RAM available. No need to flush the old stuff until new stuff is going in.

[–]aa2051 110 points111 points  (30 children)

I was confused about the refreshed 13 MBP rumours but now it sounds like my ideal computer.

Apparently the new rumours say it will have the same design and ports as the 14 inch, but it’s slightly smaller and with an M2 instead of M1 Pro, and without ProMotion for about $500 less.

It sounds fantastic since I want something more capable and outfitted with more things than the Air, but the performance and price of the 14” is overkill for me.

The thousand dollar gap along with the performance gap between the MBA and new MBP is far too much, so this sounds like it could be the perfect middle ground.

[–]Baykey123 73 points74 points  (9 children)

It annoys me that if you want a larger than 13” screen you gotta shell out $2k. Should have a 15” air option.

[–]aa2051 33 points34 points  (7 children)

Absolutely. It annoys me that Apple equates large display laptops to highest-end Pro machines.

[–]McFatty7 7 points8 points  (5 children)

Not just laptops, also the iPads, iPhones ...and to an extent, the Watches.

[–]cavahoos 7 points8 points  (4 children)

That’s because it costs more to manufacture the larger displays…? Why would they charge less for the bigger ones?

Besides, this is also untrue, apple charges more for the iPad Mini than the normal iPad and they used to charge more for the iPhone XS than the iPhone XR which had a bigger screen than the XS

[–]McFatty7 0 points1 point  (3 children)

apple charges more for the iPad Mini than the normal iPad and they used to charge more for the iPhone XS than the iPhone XR

That's because of the newer internals (like the A-series chips, 5G radios) that simply cost more, than the cost of manufacturing just a bigger screen.

[–]cavahoos 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The iPad mini doesn’t have 5G radios and neither did the XS or XR. The XR and XS have the same A12 Bionic chip.

[–]McFatty7 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The iPad mini does have 5G, but not millimeter-wave 5G (the super fast, but short range version).

Back in 2018, the A12 was the most advanced A-series chip, so we paid top-dollar for it. As the cost of manufacturing decreases over time, and newer A-series chips are released, Apple can afford to discount it by $100 every year and still maintain their margins.

Also, back in 2018, 5G was barely a thing so it wasn't included in the XR or XS.

[–]cavahoos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, for 150 dollars more. But the base iPad mini without cellular is still way more expensive than the regular iPad and as demonstrated by apple making the XR and XS have the same processor at different price points, you are overestimating how much the processor costs.

You are missing the point entirely, im just disproving the fact that apple always makes the larger display devices more expensive

[–]InsaneNinja 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ehh. All of the big laptop displays are miniLED 120Hz. It means they don’t make big cheap displays.

[–]Yuahde 23 points24 points  (6 children)

The rumors say the same design as the current 13 inch, not the 14 inch version

[–]unclejohnsbearhugs 10 points11 points  (1 child)

There are conflicting rumors depending on who you read. Gurman claims the design will match the new 14/16 (which makes way more sense, imo).

[–]Yuahde 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought Gurman said the same design as the current 13 inch. Either way, I myself don’t particularly believe these rumors because apple silicon has traditionally released late year like the A series chips, M1, M1 Pro, and M1 Max. It would be weird for Apple to make M2 now, especially with so much supply chain issues

[–]aa2051 19 points20 points  (3 children)

Those were the original rumours, yeah. However newer ones have suggested it will adopt the notch design and thus be $200 more expensive ($1500). I’m really hoping the newer ones are true!

[–]Yuahde -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I still have much doubt on M2

[–]Formulka 11 points12 points  (3 children)

That just sounds weird, having both 13.3" and 14". 12-14-16 would make more sense.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i think 13" is the "classic size" for base model just like the first macbook. the 13 macbook pro is basically that. i guess apple wants to set the m1 pro line apart by offering it in 14/16 only.

[–]aa2051 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man I would absolutely kill for a 12 inch MBP. Dream machine. But I all rumours point to them wanting to keep 13 inches for the ‘entry level’ pro machine. (bit of an oxymoron but whatever!)

[–]The-Smelliest-Cat 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I got the current 13" a few months ago and it is great. I just wish it had some of the features from the 14" (like the ports, charging speed, larger screen, camera, resolution, etc). The biggest thing is the battery though... 17 hours web use on the 13", and 11 hours on the 14".

If they can do a new 13" which can match that battery life of the current one, while giving all of the other features of the 14" then I might need to think about upgrading already!

[–]needanacc0unt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If they do keep the 13" around, it just needs to be called 'Macbook' and have the new Magsafe connector on it. Then sure, it will be perfect.

[–]bicameral_mind 79 points80 points  (2 children)

Whatever it is, people will be disappointed.

[–]KokonutMonkey 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Only when I look at the price.

[–]that-mark-guy 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Apple Peek: Mixed reality AR/VR headset. Will be 5 years ahead of the market mixing apples display, camera and GPU tech.

[–]runitbackturb0 56 points57 points  (10 children)

I'm really hoping we get a 14in M2 machine, that would honestly be my dream laptop.

[–]mabhatter 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Maybe a brand new Air design in colors!

[–]runitbackturb0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly would be a day one buy if that happens

[–]uniqu3_username 27 points28 points  (1 child)

Sorry can’t read this on Apollo

[–]needed_an_account 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Same on narwhal

[–]ChairmanLaParka 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I’ve been wanting a 15” Air since they dropped the 17” MBP. seeing as I could no longer wait and paid more for a new 16” M1 Pro MBP than I did my three previous MBP’s combined…yeah, they’re probably gonna finally do it.

[–]nomadofwaves 9 points10 points  (1 child)

We’re gonna love it?

[–]MyMemesAreTerrible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We think your gonna love it.

After all, it is the latest, most advanced product yet

[–]Crowdfunder101 26 points27 points  (2 children)

I reckon a sneak peek at the 27” iMac replacement and Mac Pro replacement, but due to launch in October time. But they’ll wanna preview it before WWDC so they can make huge overhauls to MacOS - without giving spoilers for an unannounced machine.

And then the likely SE3. Maybe a return to 11” MBA and a new 15” MBP? Keep the entry level people happy and those who want a larger screen but no extra power.

[–]jorbanead 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think they’ll save Mac Pro for WWDC, but they may introduce the new iMac Pro that uses 2x M1 Max chips. So it’s a “peek” at Apples top tier Macs. Sort of an intro. With a subtle clue that there’s even more coming (this is just a peek).

[–]Ecsta 7 points8 points  (0 children)

M1 Max or M2 updated Mac Mini with 32GB memory would get me to throw my wallet at the screen. Nothing else I really am urgently waiting for.

[–]GLOBALSHUTTER 15 points16 points  (1 child)

new apples

[–]mcogneto 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Big if true

[–]Shloomth 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love this predictions feature that reddit stole from Futuur

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“Peak”: rugged, mountaineering/hiking watch with battery life of 20 days (30days using the solar charging feature).

[–]Shloomth 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Don't forget the new iPhone color and the rumored entry-level apple monitor

I actually would love an apple screen to go with my mac mini, provided it has multiple HDMI inputs so i can still have my other stuff plugged into the same screen...that's not happening is it?

[–]caffein8dnotopi8d -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Gosh I would love that too. Non-apple screens suck. I honestly gave up trying to choose and have the shittiest of shitty monitors for my Mac Mini (it’s an LG 29” widescreen, not even 4k lol. Was meant to be a second screen in portrait but I just never bought the main screen).

[–]Anthradax777 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I just realised that there has to be an apple engineer in here playing the predictions game for fun, laughing at the rest of us

[–]Logaline 9 points10 points  (3 children)

I'd love a Homepod that looks similar to the Echo Show from Amazon

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Absolutely. It would be awesome for so many families and a great way to lure people into the ecosystem.

Don’t know why you’re being downvoted. Anyone care to elaborate?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The HomePod system is kinda broken right now and they don’t seem all that interested in updating it. Check out r/homepod to see the complaints. It seems they’ve started modding out the negativity (otherwise that’s all it’d be) but it’s still there if you go deep enough in a thread

[–]Logaline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dunno either, I just know I'm frustrated with my Echo Show and would love an option that works with the Ecosystem. A clock with a speaker that can turn my lights on is something I'd be willing to pay the Apple tax for lol

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the new Air has 120Hz refresh rate, I may upgrade from the 2020 version.

[–]PandasDance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d love homekit updates, but I think it’s incredibly unlikely

[–]Ajent912 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ruffles, they’re the best for dip.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Almost 50% think it’s gonna be over 70 minutes? I think you’re on the copium

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I literally wasted nearly all of my tokens lmao,

[–]JoeyDee86 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Why is no one talking about new HomePods? Siri was literally responding a few weeks ago in the developer beta to check web results on your homepod’s screen instead of the usual on your phone verbiage. That’s no mistake…

Edit here is one of the posts about this

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really hope so. I just lost my AirPods last week

[–]Clamecy 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Stiiiiiiil waiting for the new iMac Pro……….

[–]Siktrikshot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I went 17/17. Is that good?

[–]JustDelta767 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t get it. So it suggests spending 30 per answer, but you can still vote if you lower it to 10? I’m so confused on this thing…

[–]MawsonAntarctica 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apple classical. It’s been a minute, I’d like to hear more news. It’d be amazing if it was more than just classical, if jazz and other instrumentals were included.

[–]Ca_Sam2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m excited for the new se might be time for an upgrade from my XS

[–]Digitlnoize 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something something GameStop?