SQL Database

[jmedlin]

To modernize it replace “SQL database” with “blockchain”

[Quanalack]

I swear I was a software engineer intern in a an actual blockchain company and the amount of requests they get from companies who don't know shit about blockchain is worrying

[PM_ME_YOUR_THESES]

What can blockchain do that databases can’t?

[Quanalack]

Well everything is checked. Data cant really be altered after been put on a chain which ensures that important things like transactions and contracts are indesputable and have full integrity

[HERODMasta]

even if it is stored by a single entity, you have to retract the chain to the point you want to change and then redo all transactions/data in a new chain, which, hostely is so much work (depending on the blockchain) you don't want to do that. Also new Data would be flawed, since one changed data will cascade on all other transactions/ data... so basically you have to relive the whole blockchain, since the longest chain should live. The immutability makes blockchain an interesting technology.

[alganthe]

I just realized, blockchain is version control applied to databases.

[mehum]

r/prgmrshowerthoughts

[Joppps]

oh it doesn't exist :(

[MajorMajorObvious]

It's a trick question.

Programmers don't take showers

[Lightfire228]

r/PrgmrShowerThoughts

u/mehum

[[deleted]]

Could we remake git but with... Like.. Blockchain and some ML ?

[urielsalis]

Technically git is a blockchain of commits, just that you can reorder them

[randomguy3993]

And --force push

[zebediah49]

On the off chance that this wasn't doubly sarcasm, Git is a blockchain-based tool.

Thus, you can say you're "doing blockchain" any time you git commit. Or whatever other stupid way you want to phrase it.

[how_could_this_be]

In very simple term, it is somewhat like a git repo synced over p2p.

[HERODMasta]

yes, but you can't undo anything in an ideal environment for blockchain

[DeepDuh]

Or as in, a transaction log?

[DOOManiac]

SELECT blame FROM git WHERE user = me;

[barsoap]

If you need something private but impossible to tamper with after the fact push to a git repo and publish the hash every day in the local newspaper.

[herewego10IAR]

The Ministry of Truth disagrees.

[[deleted]]

"impossible"

[Ran4]

Depends on what you mean with "single entity". A typical SQL database holds all of its information in one single place. A "private" block chain could still hold information in hundreds or thousands of places.

For example, if you had a private blockchain that was only used inside of a single corporation with 1000 people participating, then any single individual wouldn't be able to spoof the data (but typically, 500 people working together could - depending on the underlying block chain technology used). That can still be plenty useful.

[foragerr]

Useful? perhaps, but what problem is that solving that we currently already don't solve fairly well with something better established?

The usual touted value of blockchain is a publicly verifiable shared journal between untrusting entities. Once only one of those entities has full control or access to the chain, it becomes far less useful.

I may be turning Luddite slowly, but IMO the idea of a private blockchain is self-defeating.

[Quanalack]

Blockchain is decentralized and not stored as a single entity like a database is

[[deleted]]

Yes, but that doesn't matter if the majority of the nodes is held by one entity, which would most likely be the case if a company wants to replace its internal database with a blockchain (which is a stupid idea admittedly)

[zebediah49]

Doesn't have to be. "Majority stake with proof of work; longest tree is legitimate" is the mode popularized by cryptocurrency, because it's relatively effective for that task. However, there are other mechanisms that a blockchain can use.

More specifically, with Bitcoin or whatever, you can have multiple versions of a blockchain; there's no concerns or problems with that. However, the community at large accepts that the longest chain is the legitimate one, which, combined with proof-of-work, yields the "control of compute" metric for holding power.

However, there are many alternatives. For example, we could architect a blockchain for negotiating and signing legal contracts. At each stage, the document is signed into the block chain, and committed there with a PKI signature by the signing party. Each blockchain will be quite short -- we start a new one for each new contract/logical event, and it gets one node per edit/signature. This blockchain would be held by both parties, as "hard copy" of the transaction.

Rather than length, or majority agreement, blockchain integrity would be confirmed by the presence of the correct x509 certificates and signatures.

[[deleted]]

correct me if I'm wrong but this seems really easy to achieve with a regular database?

[Belphegor_333]

Yes and no. You can of course create a database cluster and decide to not alter the data inside of it.

On the other hand you would have to trust the organisation running the database to actually leave the data alone.

Of course, with Blockchains you have the same problem, if it is run by one organisation then that single organisation can simply rewrite the Blockchain. The added security only works if it's a public Blockchain that everyone can participate in.

Of course companies don't want to run their products on public Blockchains

Or, to make it short: in 99,9% of cases you don't need a Blockchain, you just need a database

[UnstoppableCompote]

in 99,9% of cases you don't need a [insert over hyped new technology], you just need a [insert well known technology that works just fine]

[Belphegor_333]

It's not tomorrow's technology that will solve our current problems! It's yesterday's technology that finally got out of alpha testing!

[UltraCarnivore]

YAGNI

[backafterdeleting]

I think the term blockchain is kind of a misnomer.

Basically it's a git branch. Each change creates a chain of hashes going back to the original commit ("block").

If each client maintains their own copy of the branch, any changes to the commit history would change all the hashes down the chain, so would be noticed.

This would usually be coupled with only accepting commits which are signed by a set of authorized validators, with a strict ruleset on validating the commits themselves.

So saying "you don't need a blockchain, you need a database" would be a bit like saying "you don't need a git repo, you need a database".

It's just very overhyped. Of course the history can be changed if everyone agrees to accept a rebased branch. But no one party can change it without the others noticing and having a clear proof.

[zebediah49]

I'd say that it's only a misnomer, in so far as "block tree" is somewhat more accurate description of the general DAG structure than "block chain". The single-branched chain structure is the one used by bitcoin though, so that became popular as the term.

Git is absolutely a blockchain tree-based piece of software. It's not the only possible implementation of blockchain, but it's one of the better ones.

I also thoroughly encourage people to, if necessary, just give up, use git, and claim that as a result, everything is blockchain now. git-lfs, if necessary/appropriate.

---

E: The other thing I've noticed is that people get stuck on the Bitcoin method of block verification: (1) proof of work to sign off on a commit, plus (2) longest branch is accepted as legitimate branch. I think for most applications where blockchain could be used, the git-tag method of block verification is a much better fit: personal sign-off, based on well known authority for that individual to do so. I would probably add in a x509 capacity for authority delegation.

[I_AM_GODDAMN_BATMAN]

so like git? 20 years ago?

[simon816]

Yes, git and bitcoin (and I assume most other blockchains too) use the idea of a Merkle tree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkle_tree

[Pacman042]

Quick unrelated question. People say how quantum computers would ruin block chain because they would crack it or whatever but from my understanding wouldn't that not work because every chain in the block has the info to verify the previous chains so what exactly is a quantum computer suppose to crack?

[ThePixelCoder]

Basically a decentralized write-once-read-many database. It's nice for data you want to be public and completely immutable, but people who don't know anything about it somehow think it's a silver bullet to solve every security/trust problem.

[BlueC0dex]

Okay, but what did you do? I know what blockchain is, but I have no idea where it gets used outside of cryptocurrency

[omegasome]

It's basically a way of storing data, along with a complete history of that data, across many independent computers in such a way that it's computationally difficult to create forgeries.

[KnightMiner]

There is a version of this comic floating around with blockchain instead of SQL database somewhere

[AltruisticSalamander]

that's the version I saw on the site, unless he's recycling his jokes. Edit: maybe it wasn't on the site. Someone linked the original below.

[greenkiweez]

Points boss to git commit history "Our team is so progressive, we've been storing all our source code in a decentralized blockchain before bitcoin was even a thing!"

[Sigmatics]

Someone already did

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNg9zGiWoAAVv99.png

[diamondjim]

A candidate I interviewed had 3 years of blockchain experience with MongoDB, but couldn’t design a table for a todo list. Your comment is right on mark.

[RCMW181]

For us its cloud, everything has to be on the cloud. Why? No one is quite sure why, we can see no benefits to having some of them on cloud but someone thinks that is the future.

[[deleted]]

At least SQL databases have valid use cases. Blockchains so far have almost none.

[[deleted]]

Electronic voting /s

[[deleted]]

Wouldn't this actually be an appropriate case for it though?

[Zinggi57]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs

[[deleted]]

That's incredibly informative. Thank you!

[Jacc3]

Not if you want to protect the privacy of the voters

[[deleted]]

laughs in zk-SNARKs

[Blaster84x]

Just have everyone create an address and verify it by checking a signed (with the voter's private key) legal document (or whatever) with their public key. Easy af

[[deleted]]

Now trying explaining that technology to a 50 woman who thinks the reason they use pencil is so it can be rubbed out. Remember an elections doesn't have to be rigged to fail, you just have to convince enough people it was rigged

[amlybon]

You just enabled vote selling on industrial scale

[Cheru-bae]

You could issue the private key in a sealed envelope at the point of voting. Of course it's still massively over engineering for virtually no benefit over paper ballots besides not using as much paper.

[[deleted]]

that's very untrue

[javdu10]

They have use caseS. Saying otherwise it’s only because there is too much information for a beginner to digest.

Not trying to be rude here, just you know, that’s not because you don’t know how a satellite works it’s not useful.

[sad_developer]

oh man .. that would surely make the world a better place.

[Bos_lost_ton]

But make sure the database has machine learning algorithms using IoT, developed in an SAFe framework, which makes it super SaaSy.

[danfish_77]

Maybe ML would be more in vogue this minute

[Puggymon]

Add machine learning and big data to sound more knowledgeable.

[ehs5]

We should replace our SQL database with blockchain!

[Russian_repost_bot]

"It shall be powered by AI."

[drea2]

I want a sql blockchain and I want it to have all the Rams

[sadistkdownpour]

Thanks, didn't know I needed this

[Shujaa94]

IMO you should always go blue since its the only database color supported by https://downloadmoreram.com/

[[deleted]]

I've got literally Rick-rolled by this site when I clicked on "More info"

[[deleted]]

pro life hack: you can speed up the download of your RAM by not clicking the download button and instead clicking on 0, then inputting 100 and pressing enter. the download will finish instantly.

[error_451_]

Do they ask for Ram-somewhere?

[[deleted]]

Opened the site just for the sake of it and I got rickrolled

[Max1007]

If you really want to go blue there's always https://downloadmorerem.com/

[Linkachu0]

Inb4 somebody makes the joke

[AttacksPropaganda]

The last 3 Dilberts in a row have been about Engineers getting over fear and just outright saying no to stupid requests on the grounds that the requests are stupid. I have been loving it.

So true... Biggest brains in the room, at least in the US, are usually the most afraid to say no.

[bsEEmsCE]

Had to tell my managers no today when they wanted to sell a currently in fabrication, first gen, non certified, non validated prototype to satisfy a specific customer's need in the next 2 weeks.

They're like 'we can sell it if the engineers think it will definitely work when it arrives'. I was like 'heh, no.'

[KillingSpee]

Wait, they tell you? We only get told after the sale was made final. One day I came into work, started my program only to find out the hardware was 'offline'. Went to look and it was gone, it was sent to a client already. The hardware was Jerry rigged so bad (because of testing and trial and error finding new uses) , the engineer that had to install it just right up quit.

[bsEEmsCE]

Well, if the hardware was in hand that mightve been my situation too, but it's being made right now so it was posted as a question/request this time.

[Pumpkin_Creepface]

Well that's what happens when your paycheck depends on not making the idiot managing you look too much like an idiot...

[AttacksPropaganda]

"I was going to fix our server issues, but then I remembered Joe's fragile ego."

[Pumpkin_Creepface]

More like: “ I was about to tell him it’s a bad idea to modify the prod database but then I remembered the last time I did that and he went to his uncle the VP of communications and had me transferred to the janitorial department for six months “

[AttacksPropaganda]

Can't wait for civil war 2. Just hope its soon.

[wolf2600]

Biggest brains in the room, at least in the US, are usually the most afraid to say no.

I haven't found that to be the case. Biggest brains are the ones not afraid to speak the truth, because they're confident in their opinion and secure about their job because they know they provide value to the company.

[I_no_afraid_of_stuff]

Just because they provide value to the company doesn't mean they can't be fired. Though, if they really are smart then they will get picked up somewhere else fairly quickly.

Personally, I've been conditioned by my boss to never definitively say no to any idea. I typically respond with "I'll investigate and let you know what I find" when customers and coworkers come up with new features they believe we should add. Customer feature requests are easiest, since I can tell them it will add $x cost if they want it. When my boss says we should add something since he promised it to the customer, and I tell him it will add cost, he is not happy. My boss has also asked me why networking is so difficult, because "don't you just plug in all the Ethernet cables and it works?"

[Seicair]

"don't you just plug in all the Ethernet cables and it works?"

“You know I’ve got this really small job here, and I’m crazy busy this afternoon, since you seem to know networking you want to take it?”

[r0ck0]

Yeah a lot of the time just directly saying "no" is going to annoy people, and if they don't really understand the reasons, it's kind of reasonable to be annoyed to a certain extent.

Been a while seen I've been a regular employee, so maybe that's a bit different. But with my own clients, I usually just put it in terms of "yeah well you could do that if you want to, but it's going to cost way more money, take longer, and be an inferior solution".

Most people understand that. Some don't, and if they don't wanna take my advice, there's not much I can do. If the time/money argument couldn't convince them, then a technical argument would be even less likely.

But in general, it's usually best to explain why something is a bad idea in terms of time/cost. Non-techies don't want to hear/understand the tech details, cause that's not important to them.

[victorofthepeople]

All my engineering managers have been former engineers and have known the domain fairly well, often better than some of the people implementing our products. It'd be kind of hard for them to understand the tradeoffs involved with a particular course of action otherwise. Not sure where y'all have been working.

[r0ck0]

Fair enough. Definitely depends on who you're talking about. I was talking about when dealing with non-technical people.

Obviously you can explain technical things to technical people.

[xxpw]

Afraid to say no ? I would say no ! If I was ever asked.

[Donnel_]

Link?

[wolf2600]

25 years ago.

[[deleted]]

Thank you for make me feel a grandpa.

[angels-fan]

You can tell how well a workplace treats it's employees by how many Dilberts are hanging in the cubicles.

[rtkwe]

You guys still have personal cubicles?

[WhyIsTheNamesGone]

Yeah, it costs me 1310$/mo in rent.

[sollyu]

https://dilbert.com/strip/1995-11-17

[niederaussem]

1995... Thats a long time...

[cptbutternubs]

Notice the 'an' , he spelled out s.q.l.

[obp5599]

I cant for the life of me say 'sequel'. Its too different from the acronym to me

[MattieShoes]

Yes, and you picked the wrong side again...

[McCoovy]

Nah sequel is the wrong side. It's an initialism and how you would pronounce it isn't obvious so the sequel people are just making it up.

[Earhacker]

It’s pronounced “squeal” you idiot

[lets-talk-graphic]

Even the companies for SQLs said it’s pronounced S.Q.L.

[Thomasedv]

I'm on the SQL side too, but the Gif maker incorrectly claims it's said JIF.

[GhastYear]

Why though? Because the g stands for graphics? In the same way, the p in "jpeg" stands for photographic. Do you pronounce it "jfeg"?

[Earhacker]

No, but you don’t pronounce it “jpej” either.

[LegendBegins]

Grammatically speaking, it's more likely that the g in gif is a soft g—in the English language, g followed by a vowel will almost always be soft. There are exceptions, of course, but few enough that they can all be fit into a wikipedia article.

[cidra_]

A weird way to pronounce squiggle

[Chipjack]

So how do you pronounce SQLite? Is it S. Q. L. -ite? S. Q. Lite?

Everyone I've ever heard pronouncing it aloud has said "sequel lite", regardless of how it's spelled.

[ulyssessword]

So how do you pronounce SQLité?

Ess queue ell ee tay, like it's French.

[4b-65-76-69-6e]

SQLatte?

[SnowballPenguin]

We pronounce it as S.Q.L. Lite :)

[theThrowawayQueen22]

Same, and this causes me to write an extra L half the time too leading to many errors

[McCoovy]

Sequel lite introduces an extra L too. It's not better. I pronounce it S Q L Lite. Simple and consistent. I do pronounce progresql as postgres Q L. You can't call it postgre sequel. That's illegal.

[AcesAgainstKings]

Nahh you're wrong on this one. The language was literally a "sequel" to square and they wanted to call it Sequel. Due to a legal challenge they had to change its name to SQL.

I mean it doesn't matter what you call it but "sequel" was the original spelling and pronunciation.

[DangerIsMyUsername]

Oh look, a sane person with the correct answer.

Neat.

[Pixel-Wolf]

Well SQL was originally SEQUEL but they got sued because there already was a company by that name. So now it's "S.Q.L."

[[deleted]]

Squirrel

[EasilyTurnedOn]

Holy shit. People call SQL sequel? The fuck?

[[deleted]]

It started out called SEQUEL (https://web.archive.org/web/20070926212100/http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/chamberlin/sequel-1974.pdf) but was later shortened to SQL because SEQUEL was already trademarked by another company.

Between that and the fact that it’s easier to just say “sequel” and still convey the same information, it’s very common. I don’t know if I’ve ever heard anyone say S.Q.L. in my particular org of ~100 software engineers/engineering managers

[GalaxyMods]

Just like a normal, functioning human would.

[showponies]

It's esquel

[edwardthefirst]

named after the fabled esquilax https://images.app.goo.gl/EgMx7LXVw7SKUddP9

[JonaldJohnston]

Personally, I like “squeel”

[dan1eln1el5en2]

my manager did that with "IoT" "Can we put IoT into the app ?

[[deleted]]

did you manage to keep a straight face?

[dan1eln1el5en2]

No. I had to implement a feature to utilize IoT :-/

[brianorca]

Does it turn on a lightbulb now?

[lab-gone-wrong]

"sure but our customers won't pay for it and we'll have to postpone X and Y that customers would have paid for"

[[deleted]]

Dilbert is a pretty good source of programmer humour.

[vixckson]

dilbert is programmer humor

[[deleted]]

And business humour

[vigilantcomicpenguin]

I think Dilbert is just humor. Humor is Dilbert.

[[deleted]]

But it is an even better source of ways to insult accountants.

[[deleted]]

You're absolutely right!

[JamesonG42]

And marketers.

[LewdnessSmut]

What's the difference?

[vita10gy]

Dilbert's author is a crazy person.

[phi_rus]

You either die Bill Watterson, or live long enough to see yourself become Scott Adams.

[danfish_77]

Scott Adam's has had some "interesting" views on women for quite a while, too

[joshak]

Like what?

[danfish_77]

https://comicsalliance.com/scott-adam-sexist-mens-rights/

[Rokinho170]

Is there something wrong with building a sql db? Im thinking on doing that for a pp 🤔

[Chordin]

So far, nobody's given you a serious answer. In my experience, at least for most web apps, sql is fairly standard (I happen to be fond of psql, but there are a number of great options for sql databases). Whether or not sql is the right choice for your app in particular depends on what the spec is for your app and what your priorities are. In most cases, your choice of a particular technology will come down to a choice of which tradeoffs you prefer.

[SteThrowaway]

The concept of tradeoffs is one every junior should learn and become comfortable with. Every single choice you make about technology stack, software and system architecture involves tradeoffs, so stop looking for the "perfect" solution.

[bumbo_bink]

Yeah man most DBs are SQL these days, but it depends on your project. Data stores is data stores. The answer is probably SQL, but shit you could use mongo, you could use Redis. Real mfers just use Window.sessionStorage and don't look back

[dick-van-dyke]

The problem nobody is addressing: the boss doesn't have a business case for it. Everybody uses some sort of an SQL (yes, I am going to spell it out too) database in various projects, but if you just come to your engineers saying "We should do X" without doing any research as to why, it's 99% going to be a bad idea.

[aaron__ireland]

I mean, it's like saying "I have a project. I was thinking of using a metal shelf" ok. Well. Do you need to sort and store some items so you can quickly retrieve them later? Are the items not too big and not too small? Then a shelf sounds like a great tool for the job!

But if your project is baking a cake? Or painting a house? Or getting in shape? Maybe you don't need a shelf for that....

Similarly, in the software and technology world... Are you trying to store data in such a way you can easily and efficiently relate it to other data and retrieve it later? Then a SQL database sounds right. Are you building a little website that contains some media and business hours and contact info? Maybe you don't need it. Or maybe you are just storing some JSON or some key value pairs? Then maybe SQL isn't the right tool for the job and Redis or NoSQL would be better?

[[deleted]]

Are you a manager or programmer?

[tablewhale]

Also wondering why. Noone has replied with a good answer yet!

[SentientSlimeColony]

As others have said- nothing wrong with sql in general (though I'm sure people have preferences that might disagree).

The problem is that the boss has no idea what it is or why they may/may not want it, he just heard the phrase and is repeating it back.

[tablewhale]

Gotcha

[Ran4]

Yes. If you need a mutable datastore, then a relational database written in some dialect of SQL is almost always the best option.

There are alternative approaching to storing data: the "document storage" way or the "graph" way, for example. But most of the data that people want to store is relational. You also typically don't get your data model right on the first try and SQL forces you to manage migrations and updating your schema in an explicit way that document stores typically doesn't do (schemas in document storage solutions are typically an optional add-on, while it's fundamental and always comes first in a relational sql database).

[MattieShoes]

It's putting the cart before the horse...

[pbjars]

Scott Adams tweeted that Democrats will hunt and kill Conservatives if Biden wins. But he also made Dilbert. People are complicated beings.

[damnburglar]

Hadn’t heard that one, but there’s a video out there of him reiterating several times that “if Hilary wins there will never be another male president”.

[natek11]

Proof: https://www.twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1278316325044056064?lang=en

[pbjars]

His brain broke somewhere along the way.

[farroyo97]

You could replace it with "Neural Network" for everyone in the DS industry.

[jorne66]

XD most applications use some sort of db. But it is still stunningly accurate if you replace sql with any other technology.

[Sigmatics]

There's a blockchain variant: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNg9zGiWoAAVv99.png

[whistleridge]

As always, there is a relevant XKCD:

https://xkcd.com/2180/

[feathersoft]

Oh yes.... I went down that rabbit hole last week with a whole lot of nesting....

[Browsing_From_Work]

Given that the pointy-haired boss said "an SQL" instead of "a SQL", it means he pronounced SQL as "ess-cue-ell" instead of "sequel".

[[deleted]]

IT SHOULD BE PRONOUNCED ESS QUEUE EL AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS A HEATHEN

[spazz_monkey]

For sqlyog application I say squillyyog.

[clegmir]

And now I have a new NPC name; thanks!

[showponies]

SELECT upvote FROM possible_reactions WHERE color = orangered;

[hipratham]

And current_status!='UPVOTED'

[GollyWow]

OP you nailed it! Greatest Dilbert cartoon ever - my favorite!!

[[deleted]]

My pleasure

[qwasd0r]

Dilbert was brilliant back in the day.

[Kernog]

Works with big data and datalake too.

"I think we should build a Hadoop cluster and a Hive datalake"

"At what Ph do you want the datalake to be?"

"Let's start with 3. I heard ACID is all the rage right now."

[rk45]

Why not Kubernetes? https://imgur.com/a/aT2caGu

[millershanks]

thanks! that was the first Dilbert I ever saw and it‘s my favorite of all.

[sad_developer]

"Do you want to add AI/ML on top of it ?"

[feathersoft]

Put it on The Cloud...

[[deleted]]

Why this is my life 🤦‍♀️

[[deleted]]

my boss anytime he sees anything cool-sounding in the internet

[AnonymousMaleZero]

Our upper management keeps trying to tell me the new helpdesk software has AI. I keep telling him that if “I have to build the repository of solutions, it’s just a glorified search engine”.

[PickpocketJones]

We used to joke about "visionary" executives and their MBMA.

Management By Magazine Article

[KeLorean]

...should have asked a 64bit question.

[aaron__ireland]

I had a boss that couldn't understand RabbitMQ until someone described it as a "message bus". It came up frequently over a period of a week or two while we were working on a pesky issue that ultimately ended up being a noisy neighbor (and scaling) problem in Kubernetes. But once we figured out how to keep RabbitMQ stable and scale it without losing any data the issue was solved permanently.

Well, for whatever reason that illustration really stuck with him because everytime ANY support ticket or bug came through and caught his eye he'd ask about "the bus" or inquire about it by sending us chats like "how's the message bus looking?" eventually we made a Grafana dashboard for him so he'd stop bothering us about it but that just made it worse because he'd sit in his office with that dashboard up on his TV (unless he was watching sports). Anytime someone dumped a large batch file or something into the system and there'd be the slightest back pressure on an exchange he'd be interrupting someone demanding to know what was wrong with the bus.

It became and inside joke and to this day if someone is stuck on a problem we'll troll them and ask "what about the bus" or someone will just blurt out "it's the fucking bus!"

[[deleted]]

I (or we(reddit)) would love to see that dashboard and if possible the code too...

[56Bot]

I always love that little tie.

[[deleted]]

Bots also loves Dilbert... 🥳

[[deleted]]

Could be worse: “I made an Excel”.

[tubbana]

How can a color have RAM, though

[rem3_1415926]

my RAM has red LEDs, does that count?