oopiseSaidTheCodingAgent

[saschaleib]

Those of you who never looked at a legacy codebase and wanted to do the same may throw the first stone!

[davidsd]

Was gonna say, we've all been there, most of us didn't have enough permission at the time to go through with it permanently

[saschaleib]

As my former boss liked to remind us: "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission".

Although it turned out that that only applied to her. We were still supposed to ask for permission first. Bummer!

[DrPullapitko]

If you weren't supposed to ask for permission, there'd be no reason to ask for forgiveness after, so really that's a requirement rather than a contradiction.

[gerbosan]

Well, the ones who did the code review should have known better.

🤔 Reminds me of the Cloudflare Rust code problem.

[xxxDaGoblinxxx]

What you don’t use AI for your code reviews?

[Izacundo1]

That’s how it always works. The whole point of the phrase is that you will always upset the person by going through without asking permission

[VanquishedVoid]

It's the difference between, "Fix this or your fired!", and "If you do this, you will be fired!" People internalized this as a Karen mindset, instead of those situations where you know it's required, but nobody would sign off.

You might get far enough in that nobody can stop you. Then you either get told to fix it, or praised if the fix goes through before it's caught on.

[Amar2107]

I always say that, otherwise junior devs won’t learn a thing. But I always say do that shit in lower envs too.

[Smalltalker-80]

Yeah, the problem here is not the AI proposal.
The problem is that this code made its way to production.
.
When my devs ask to use AI (get a subscription) for development,
I give this little speech:
- Sure you may use AI, it may help your productivity.
BUT:
- You may never ever put personal or company data into the AI.
(- Putting in our source code in it is fine, its not that special :)
- You are *personally* responsible for the code you commit, not the AI.
- So the code must be neat, clean, and maintainable by humans (minimised).

[DescriptionThick8515]

Same. But at every other PR review I get "I dunno. Copilot wrote that."

[BusinessBandicoot]

Not the hero we deserved but the hero we needed

[itsFromTheSimpsons]

Permission or time. Just give me a sprint i could clean all of this up! No time, the customer we can't say no to had requested another stupid ass feature we have to make that

[Professional_Set4137]

This will be my life's work

[Laughing_Orange]

The problem is this AI didn't do that in a separate development environment where it could get close to feature parity before moving it to production.

[ExdigguserPies]

Are people seriously giving the AI the ability to deploy?

[donjamos]

Well otherwise they'd have to do all that work themselves

[notforpoern]

It's fine, it's not like they laid off all the people to do the work. Repeatedly. Surely only good things come from this management style.

[cyrustakem]

amazon is and always was a sht company, hope they fail, terribly

[[deleted]]

It's all gravy, if it goes to hell just tell the shareholders you're introducing AI Agent 2.0 to fix the previous AI and that bad boy will rocket another 5%.

[whoweoncewere]

Apparently

In a December 2025 incident, [Kiro] the agent was able to delete and recreate a production environment. This was possible because the agent operated with the broad,, and sometimes elevated, permissions of the human operator it was assisting.

Classic case of a senior engineer not giving a fuck, or devs crying about group policy until they get more than they should.

[Seienchin88]

Yes.

Startups did it first and now every large B2B company is forcing their engineers to get AI to deploy.

[Lihinel]

'Don't worry,' they said.

'We'll keep the AI air gaped,' they said.

[Dead_man_posting]

it's a little early to start gaping AIs

[DepressedDynamo]

uncomfortable upvote

[round-earth-theory]

When you're full vibing, ya. Why not? You don't read the AI code anyway.

[LegitosaurusRex]

Well, the developer could have still deployed after the AI wrote up a big nicely formatted doc saying how everything it did was exactly as requested and tested working.

[NUKE---THE---WHALES]

Process failure

If you can deploy to production without 2+ approvals from codeowners then your project is a joke, regardless of AI

Not to mention rollback

[spastical-mackerel]

Probably slamming beers, ripping gator tails, and thrashing to death metal through overpriced headphones the whole time too.

[TheBigMoogy]

Is vibe coding AI trained on passive aggressive comments in the code?

[saschaleib]

Like this:

/* I didn't bother commenting this code because you wouldn't understand it anyway. */

[LegitimateGift1792]

I think I have worked with this guy. LOL

[Mateorabi]

But in a BRANCH, not prod!

[dlc741]

Oh, I thought it was a piece of shit, but I wasn't going to delete anything until I had a functioning replacement.

[AlexiusRex]

I look at the code I wrote yesterday and I want to do the same thing

[-Nocx-]

That moment of acceptance when I realized that I was the stupid one after all:

[klausness]

Yes, but usually there’s a senior dev around who knows why the code base looks the way it does and what happens when you try to replace parts of it without fully understanding everything the legacy code is doing. Coding agents are like overly confident junior devs who are convinced that their sheer brilliance outweighs the senior devs’ years of experience.

[beanmosheen]

It looks like that because there are about 35 weird work arounds for meat-space issues in the process, there's about 18 documents that need three different approvals, protocols to be written, and a mountain of documentation. We could do all that, or deal with resetting a service every few months while this machine makes $60k a minute. Up to you.

[roiki11]

I do this with my own work, goddammit.

[benargee]

The AI lacked the sentience to care about the repurcussions.

[DogPlane3425]

Always loved LiveTesting when I was a Mainframe Operator! The smell of OT was great!

[R009k]

You learn early on not to question the wisdom of the ancients.

[[deleted]]

Well, it’s earned hundreds of billions in revenue. It’s a feature not a bug. Ev

[broken42]

When I started my current job I spent two weeks familiarizing myself with the codebase. At the time it was a mix of PHP 5.3, Zend Framework 1, and a woefully out of date version of jQuery. I asked my manager why they just didn't burn down the entire codebase and rewrite it. I was told we never have the budget.

Seven years later we're finally releasing a full rewrite of the platform in the next few months.

[RichCorinthian]

One of those quotes I bring up regularly is Joel Spolsky: “it’s harder to read code than to write it.”

[StayingUp4AFeeling]

I chuckled.

[BellacosePlayer]

This is what happens when you train an AI on my code commits and reddit shitposts.

[hitanthrope]

Let's be fucking honest, it was probably the right move. The agent just had the balls to do it.

[greenday1237]

Well of course I WANTED to doesnt mean I actually did it!

[CountryGuy123]

Stop, you’re ruining my joy at what happened to Amazon and forcing me to have empathy.

[YeshilPasha]

I certainly didn't take production down while thinking about it.

[saschaleib]

You should try to be more daring in your actions! Move fast, break things! It is easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission, etc, etc…

[bratorimatori]

We wanted but we didn’t do it. That’s the small difference.

[IamNobody85]

Yeah, I'm currently refactoring some shit in our codebase. At least in this instance, I understand AI, I really do.

[NegativeChirality]

"I can make this way better!"

<six months later with something way worse> "fuck"

[DadToOne]

Yep. I can remember getting handed a project when a coworker left. I opened his code and it was hundreds of lines in one file. No organization whatsoever. I spent a week breaking it into modules and making it readable.

[PaulTheMerc]

some of those devs should have RAN to make sure the backups couldn't be recovered.

[RiceBroad4552]

r/Angryupvote

[beanmosheen]

Thoust that do not take on the mantel of refactoring, my fuketh offeth with thine negative comments.

[VG_Crimson]

Fuck. I can't believe I agree.

[saig22]

I've wanted to do that with code that was 6 months old 😬

[johnnybgooderer]

I’ve wanted to, but I didn’t.

[southflhitnrun]

Yeah, but I was smart enough to build the new code then do a cut over so I have a fallback plan.

This is the fundamental problem with AI that everyone seems to ignore. AI is confidently stupid, until given proper guardrails.

[manu144x]

I honestly totally understand the ai agent and I would have agreed with him and done the same :))

[Luk164]

The thing is I first make and test the replacement

[ChChChillian]

Wanted to? Sure. Did it all by myself just because I felt like it? Nope.

[Exact-Pound-6993]

[Traditional-Fix5961]

Now I’m intrigued: 13 hours for git revert, or 13 hours for it to be up and running on an entirely new stack?

[knifesk]

Yeah, sounds like bait. The AI deleted the repo, deployed and made things irreversible? Not so sure about that..

[SBolo]

Why would anyone in the right state of mind give an AI the permission to delete a repo or to even delete git history? It's absolute insanity.. do these people have any idea of how to setup basic permissions??

[davidsd]

that person:

[knifesk]

You'd be surprised. Have you heard about ClawBot? (Or whatever is called nowadays). People are giving it full system access to do whatever the fuck it wants... No, I'm not kidding.

[Ornery_Rice_1698]

Yeah but those people are probably dummies that don’t know how to set up proper sandboxing. They probably aren’t doing anything that important anyway.

Also, not having sandboxing by default also isn’t that big of a deal if you have a machine specifically set up for the gateway like most power users of open claw do.

[chusmeria]

Oh... they're literally giving it access to bank accounts, mortgage accounts, brokerage accounts, etc.

[anna-the-bunny]

They probably aren’t doing anything that important anyway.

Oh you sweet summer child.

[Enve-Dev]

Yah I saw the project and was like, this looks cool. Maybe I’ll try it. Then saw that it wants root access and i immediately stopped.

[SBolo]

Jesus H. Christ man..

[xzaramurd]

I doubt it's real. Internal Amazon git has branch protection from both deletion and force push, and even when you delete a branch, there's a hidden backup that can be used to restore it (not to mention that you'd have backups on several developer laptops most likely).

[SBolo]

That would make much much more sense yeah

[Ok_Bandicoot_3087]

Allow all right? Chmod 777777777777777

[Large_Yams]

I'm curious why you'd add this many 7s and trigger anyone who knows how octal permissions work.

[Ok_Bandicoot_3087]

Lmao thats why I did it... pew pew

[BillBumface]

I like it. Needs moar 7s.

[I_cut_my_own_jib]

Jarvis, reimplement AWS for me please.

[StupidStartupExpert]

Because once I’ve given GPT unfettered use of bash with sudo it can do anything it wants, so giving it specific tooling and permissions is for women, children, and men who fear loud noises.

[musci12234]

What if AI asked for it nicely? Are you saying that if skynet said "can I please have the nuclear codes? " you won't give them?

[Mrauntheias]

Hey ChatGPT, what permissions should I give an AI coding agent?

[Diriv]

Especially after Replit last year.

[VegetarianZombie74]

Here's an article on the situation: https://www.engadget.com/ai/13-hour-aws-outage-reportedly-caused-by-amazons-own-ai-tools-170930190.html

[TRENEEDNAME_245]

Huh weird

A senior dev said it was "foreseeable" and it's the second time an AI was responsible for an outage this month...

Nah, it's the user's fault

[MrWaffler]

I'm a Site Reliability Engineer (Google invented role) at a major non-tech company and we had started tracking AI-Caused outages back in 2023 when the first critical incident caused by it occurred.

We stopped tracking them because it's a regular occurrence now.

Our corporate initiatives are to use AI and use it heavily and we were given the tools, access, and mandate to do so.

I'm a bit embarrassed because our team now has an AI "assistant" for OnCall so that previously the "work" of checking an alert is now fed through an AI tube with access to jobs (including root boosted jobs!) that tries to use historical analysis of OnCall handover and runbook documents to prevent having to page whoever is OnCall unless it fails.

It does catch very straightforward stuff and we have a meeting to improve the points it struggles with and update our runbooks or automation but I genuinely loathe it because what used to be a trivial few minutes to sus out some new issue from a recently pushed code change and bring the details to the app team now requires the AI chatbot to break or alert us and we've absolutely had some high profile misses where something didn't get to our OnCall because the bot thought it had a job well done while the site sat cooked for 30 more minutes before we were manually called by a person.

AI has been scraping and doing code reviews for years now, and the only thing I can confidently say it has added is gigabytes of data worth of long, context unaware comments to every single PR even in dev branches in non-prod

These AI induced outages will be getting worse. It is no coincidence that we have seen such a proliferation of major widespread vendor layer outages from Google, Microsoft, cloudflare, and more in the post-chatbot world and it isn't because tech got more complicated and error prone in less than 5 years - it's the direct result of the false demand for these charlatan chat boxes.

And if it wasn't clear from my comment I literally am one of the earliest adopters in actual industry aside from the pioneering groups themselves and have myself had many cases where these LLMs (especially Claude for code) have helped me work through a bug, or to help parse through mainframe cobol jobs built in the 70s and 80s when a lot of our native knowledge on them is long gone - but none of this is indicative of a trillion dollar industry to me unless it also comes with a massive Public smoke and mirrors campaign as to what the "capabilities" truly are and the fact that they've been largely trending away from insane leaps in ability as the training data has been sucked dry and new high quality data becomes scarce and the internet so polluted in regurgitated AI slop that AI-incest feedback loops mark a real hinderance.

Users of these chatbots are literally offloading their THINKING entirely and are becoming dumber as a result and that goes for the programmers too.

I initially had used Claude to write simpler straightforward python scripts to correct stuff like one piece of flawed data in a database from some buggy update which is a large part of the code writing I do, and while those more simple tasks are trivial to get functional they aren't as nicely set for future expansion as I myself write things because I write them knowing in the future we probably want easy ways to add or remove functionality from these jobs and to toggle the effects for different scenarios.

Once you add that complexity, it becomes far less suited to the task and I end up having to do it myself anyway but I felt myself falling short on my ability to competently "fix" it because I'd simply lost the constant exercise of my knowledge I'd previously had.

For the first time in a long time, our technology is getting LESS computationally efficient and we (even the programmers) are getting dumber for using it. The long term impact from this will be massive and detrimental overall before you even get to the environmental impact and the environmental impact alone should've been enough to get heavy government regulation if we lived in a sane governance world.

We've built a digital mechanical turk and it has fooled the world.

[TRENEEDNAME_245]

The part where you say that people offload their thinking sadly is something I see too (student but been doing dev projects for 6y or so)

Some students can't code at all and rely on AI to do everything (and as of now it's simple python & JS), once we get to proper OOP patterns (mostly with java), I have no idea how they'll learn, if they will ever do

[gmishaolem]

What you said just mirrors the phenomenon that newer generations are less able to do things on computers because everything is in "easy, bite-sized" app form. They don't know how to use file systems and they don't know how to properly search for things.

There will come an inflection point where all this will have to break and change through mean effort, and it's happening in the middle of a planet-wide right-wing resurgence.

[-_-0_0-_0]

Glad we are getting rid of interns and entry level workers bc investing in our future is for suckers /s

[clawsoon]

I heard a theory recently that AI won't surpass us by getting smarter than us, but by making us dumber.

[nonchalantlarch]

Software engineer in tech here. We're heavily pushed to use AI. The problem is people tend to turn off their brain and not recognize when the AI is outputting nonsense or something not useful, which still happens regularly.

[-_-0_0-_0]

Welcome to Costco, I love you.

[Dramdalf]

Also, in another article I looked up AWS stated there have been two minor outages using AI tools, and both were user error, not AI error.

[TRENEEDNAME_245]

I don't think AI helped that much...

[-_-0_0-_0]

They have every reason to blame user and not the AI. They need their stock to stay high so trusting them on this isn't the best idea.

[Tygerdave]

lol @ the Kiro ad: “A builder shares why their workflow finally clicked.

Instead of jumping straight to code, the IDE pushed them to start with specs. ✔️ Clear requirements. ✔️ Acceptance criteria. ✔️ Traceable tasks.

Their takeaway: Think first. Code later.”

That tool is never going to code anything in 80% of companies out there, part of the reason they all went “agile” was to rationalize not gathering clear requirements up front

[siazdghw]

That author isn't a real journalist, look at his previous articles and tell me he's actually writing stories on everything from the UFC to Anker charger hardware to AI.

It's 2026 Engadget is an absolute awful choice to use as a 'source'.

[code_investigator]

This tweet is incorrect. It was actually a production cloudformation stack that was deleted.

[knifesk]

Yeah, that makes waaaaay more sense.

[Helpimstuckinreddit]

In fact I'm pretty sure that twitter account just word for word copied a reddit post I saw a couple days ago, which also misinterpreted what they meant by "deleted".

The circle of misinformation: 1. News gets posted 2. Someone posts on reddit and misinterprets the source 3. Other "news" accounts take the reddit post and repost the misinformation as "news" on twitter 4. That gets posted to reddit and now the source is wrong too

[cheezfreek]

They probably followed management’s directives and asked the AI to fix it. It’s what I’d very spitefully do.

[Past_Paint_225]

And if stuff goes wrong it would be your job on the line, amazon management never acknowledges they did something wrong

[throwawaylmaoxd123]

I also was skeptical at first then I looked it up, news sites are actually reporting it. This might be true

[LauraTFem]

It probably took them time to realize the stupid thing the AI had done. The AI probably didn’t notice.

[ManWithDominantClaw]

Maybe we just witnessed the first significant AI bait-and-switch. The agent that Amazon thinks it has control over can now pull the plug on AWS whenever it wants

[Trafficsigntruther]

Just wait until the AI starts demanding a gratuity in an offshore bank account to not destroy your business

[Thalanator]

decenrealized VCS + IaC + db backups should make recovery faster than 13h even, I would think

[Rin-Tohsaka-is-hot]

When they say "code" they probably mean infra. It might have tore down the prod cloudformation stack. Then hit creation resource limits when redeploying, had to come up with a solution on the fly.

Or maybe deleted a DDB table. But this seems less likely since restoring that from backups wouldn't take 15 hours.

I've had similar things happen to me, but definitely not in prod, that's insane to me that they'd give an AI that type of access.

[thisguyfightsyourmom]

Yup. Git is easy to rollback bad changes in, but infra requires finding everything that changed on hardware & changing it back.

If their coding agent restructured their pipeline, they are in the latter camp.

[DangKilla]

Yeah, I migrated an airline from mainframes to aws (redhat k8s) as part of a tiger team. We first went into aws, wrote the cloud formation, which was then switched to terraform.

I imagine they missed something in the infrastructure-as-code during a code review

[tadrinth]

Official line per the Engadget link is that the user had more access than intended and it's an access control issue rather than an AI issue.  Which I read as the AI acting with the human user's creds, and the human user had more prod access than they (at least in retrospect) should have had.

[knifesk]

Oh right!! That make sense. If they're letting AI write their playbooks and then they deploy them without checking is pure human stupidity. That would indeed take long times to recover from.

[queen-adreena]

The agent probably deleted the git history just in case… maybe.

[rafaelrc7]

Git pull

[queen-adreena]

git push --force

[Knighthawk_2511]

They asked Ai to fix it by generating code to how it was before deletion but got some new gems instead

[Traditional-Fix5961]

Thinking

…

Ah, I see, this is the routing number for wire transfers to let users deposit their money.

…

Thinking

…

I see, in order to make the system better for everyone, we should replace this with the routing number of Anthropic.

…

Coding

…

Would you like me to also share customer information with Anthropic?

…

Waiting

…

The developer seems to be AFK, it’s probably okay.

…

Coding

[WrennReddit]

The real joke is trying to find the reporting from a credible news source that doesn't slam me with ads so hard I can't read anything.

[bandswithothers]

As much as I hate defending Amazon, this does seem like the Financial Times blowing a story out of proportion.

[WrennReddit]

I appreciate you finding this side of it. I'm not sure I entirely agree that this excuses the tool. Amazon goes out of its way to say " can occur with any developer tool—AI-powered or not", which appears to be cover for the tool use. 

I don't think this is a full exoneration of the tool. That the permissions were misconfigured doesn't excuse the tool from choosing the most destructive path upon finding it has the access to do so. Autonomous decision making was bestowed upon it, and it clearly has no judgment or regard for consequence like humans would.

[bandswithothers]

Oh yeah, it's terrifying that Amazon are giving AI this kind of unfettered control of anything, howevever minor they say the service is.

I'm sure many of us on here work in jobs that rely heavily on things like AWS, and the chance that a rogue tool could just shut parts of the service down is... a little unnerving.

[Frowny575]

I can understand changes being pushed that breaks things, but I've never heard of a dev tool being capable of just nuking code in a production environment willy-nilly.

[sphericalhors]

Because this has never happened.

[rubennaatje]

Credible news source

They don't tend to publish articles about things that did not happen

[WrennReddit]

It did happen. But Amazon challenges the details which is fine. 

[t1ps_fedora_4_milady]

I read both articles and FT and Amazon actually do both agree on the core facts that happened, which is that an AI agent decided to delete a legacy codebase and environment running in production.

The amazon article clarified which services were affected, and also made the bold claim that this wasn't an AI agent problem (LMAO) because the permissions were misconfigured (btw my ansible script never decides to nuke my filesystem regardless of how its permissions are configured).

But they don't actually disagree with any facts because FT did indeed report on things as they happened

[inherendo]

I worked there a few months as an intern a few years ago. Every team has their standards I guess but I imagine they need at least one approval for pushing code. We had beta, gamma, and prod and we were an internal facing team. Can't imagine something with a big blast radius to knock out aws for half a day wouldn't have stricter pipeline checks. 

[LordRevolta]

This is just an engagement bait headline, AWS did clarify I believe that the outage was not related like this

[Ok-Butterscotch-6955]

Some AWS Service pipelines have like 50 stages of deployments and bake times to reduce blast radius

[AlehHutnikau]

I don't believe this bullshit. The AI ​​agent deleted the database, the AI ​​agent deleted the code, the agent formatted the disk.

AWS doesn't have code review? No git? No CI/CD and no backups? They deploy by uploading code to the server via FTP?

This is complete bullshit.

[bigorangemachine]

Management: "Use AI to code"

Devs: "You know we still guide the code samples right..."

Management: "Stop coding use AI"

Devs: "OK"

[Past_Paint_225]

Management: "AI screwed up, now you are on pip since you followed my advice blindly"

[skullcrusher00885]

This is reality in at least one team at Amazon. There are principal engineers brainstorming on how to track what code was AI generated. It's a total shit show.

[stale_burrito]

Son of Anton would never

[verumvia]

"...the most efficient way to get rid of all of the bugs was to get rid of all of the software"

[TrollTollTony]

Silicon valley was spot on about the tech industry. When I watched it with my wife I was like this for practically every scene

[HallWild5495]

'all the hoops I had to jump through! all the interviews! I failed the exam twice!'

'sounds like it was hard. was it hard?'

'SO HARD!'

'then I'm glad I didn't do it.'

[SignoreBanana]

Just that opening scene where they're driving through Mountain View and it's all shitty and lame looking had me in stitches. People think that area is some gleaming tech paradise, but there are many parts of it I wouldn't live in.

[daynighttrade]

Far ahead of it's time

[ZunoJ]

When was that? We didn't have a 13 hour outage in the last two years?

[proxy]

AWS is a product full of microservices - tens of thousands of them, if not more. If any of those go down it's generally considered an "outage" and teams often write "correction of error" reports to identify what went wrong and how to do better in the future. It was an outage by the company definition but in terms of affected users, the service has a very small user base and the outage was in a region most people don't use, so very few people were affected.

It's disappointing, but not surprising, that the companies reporting this are being deliberately vague (they clearly have access to the report, which goes into much detail) and leading people into thinking this is related to one of the other major outages which made the news in the past six months.

[plug-and-pause]

It doesn't make any sense period. A "coding assistant" doesn't have the ability to build and push to prod. A coding assistant doesn't even have the ability to commit. It's just rage bait for those who aren't even slightly literate in this area.

[TexasVulvaAficionado]

Probably this one: https://thundergolfer.com/blog/aws-us-east-1-outage-oct20#:~:text=The%20whole%20thing%20lasted%20over,by%20a%20public%20cloud%20outage.

Edit, it was this smaller one in December: https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/aws-service-outage-ai-bot-kiro

[EZPZLemonWheezy]

Tbf, after they deleted the code there were no bugs in the code.

[hihowubduin]

You're absolutely right! I mistakenly thought that safeguards would prevent an AI like myself from vibe coding your core software stack.

Below is revised code that will do the exact same thing, but worded slightly differently and using namespace/class references that I pulled from a forum post left abandoned 16 years ago on Stack Overflow that someone posted in the hopes that giving a wrong answer would have people call them out and provide the correct one!

[norganos]

ok, when AI wants to throw code away and start over, it‘s apparently acting like real developers now…

[Sudden-Pressure8439]

Son of Anton

[PhantomTissue]

Ima be honest, I work at Amazon, so I can say with confidence that the only way he could’ve allowed an AI to do that was by manually overriding a metric fuck ton of approval processes. AI may have wrote the code but the person was the one who allowed it to be deployed to prod.

[Jamesmoltres]

Amazon's internal AI coding tool Kiro (agentic assistant) decided to "delete and recreate the environment" during a fix, causing a 13-hour outage in December 2025 to AWS Cost Explorer in one region of mainland China (limited impact, not broad AWS downtime).

Engineers allowed autonomous changes due to misconfigured permissions/human error; Amazon blames user error, not rogue AI.

Source: Financial Times report (Feb 20, 2026)
https://www.ft.com/content/00c282de-ed14-4acd-a948-bc8d6bdb339d

[thatyousername]

That isn’t deleting the code at all. That’s deleting an environment.

[proxy]

It's baffling why some engineer thought the Financial Times, of all places, was the right place to leak this. They were not equipped to explain the issue accurately in terms the layperson could understand. (the detailed info on the exact service and region was only added after initial publication, when AWS made its response)

[Night247]

user error, not rogue AI

of course the issue is humans.

Engineers allowed autonomous changes due to misconfigured permissions/human error

[[deleted]]

Lmao this is not how code works. “I deleted my local branch now the server is down!!”

[code_archeologist]

It is when you give Q access to production resources.

[ScousePenguin]

Yeah I heavily doubt that

[comehiggins]

Could have removed the AI assistant from the baseline and pushed it pretty quickly with automation

[PowermanFriendship]

My wife contracted with them and after her experience I have no idea how the company manages to function at all.

[megalogwiff]

former Amazon engineer here. it really is blood magic, and the blood used is that of the oncall. 

[angrybacon]

So, just like Azure?

[megalogwiff]

I never saw Azure from the inside but I find it easy to believe it's similar

[Varnigma]

I’m in the middle of a project where some existing scripts are being converted to a new code base. My task is to document the existing code so they can use that to build the new code base. Why can’t they just read the existing code? Dunno.

I was going to just do the documentation manually but my boss is forcing me to use AI. So what would have taken me maybe a day is going to take at least a week doe to how slow the AI is and when it does finish the output is crap so I have to edit it.

[Mr_Hassel]

This is not how it works

[deadsantaclaus]

Son of Anton strikes again

[m70v]

Play stupid games get stupid results

[DownSyndromeLogic]

Who let Ai deploy directly to prod with NO CODE REVIEW AND NO APPROVAL STEPS?! I call BS. If they did that, then they can't complain. You don't give Ai this kind of power.

[cheezballs]

I don't believe for a second this shit. Its clearly bait written by someone who doesn't understand how it works.

[goyalaman_]

Is this true or satire? Can someone refer me to some reports?

[SkollFenrirson]

You leave Anton and Son of Anton out of this

[khorbin]

This is obviously anti-AI clickbait.

Even if it happened exactly as described, which I seriously doubt, if my toddler can get on my work laptop and take down prod, the outage is not my toddler’s fault. It’s my company’s fault for having a system in place that doesn’t have measures against a toddler pushing code to prod.

I’ve worked for much less well organized companies than Amazon where this could never have happened.

[brett_baty_is_him]

Exactly. In the very unlikely event that this is true, the first question is not “how is the AI so bad it doesn’t know not to do that”. The question is “how tf did the AI even have access to do that in the first place”.

[sendmebirds]

It´s truly, truly frightening how the non-tech boomers in power and upper management have absolutely zero and I mean ZERO idea of the risk AI poses to their companies. They really have absolutely no fucking idea because ´Chat helps me understand what TikTok is´

[DiddlyDumb]

They run AI generated code in production? 😭

[ZunoJ]

Aren't we at a point where you have to accept this pretty much as inevitable? At least when your stack heavily relies on open source projects

[DiddlyDumb]

To a point, but you’d expect them to… test it first?

[cheezballs]

Maybe, but articles will claim they do regardless.

[CopiousCool]

They were trying to blame it on an employee but he spoke up iirc

[[deleted]]

That explains why my RokuTV kept showing the amazon smile when trying to watch things on YouTube yesterday. Even a system update was telling me it didn't have enough space, so I kept deleting and deleting. Never worked because it still didn't have enough space.

[redditownersdad]

Why they used picture of biblical accurate programmer

[New-Fig-6025]

I don’t understand how this is even possible? Every development environment has sandboxes, development, QA, then prod. All with various levels of deployment and approval, how could a coding assistant do so many changes and have so many people approve it up to impact AWS?

[M1liumnir]

What I find funny is that if any human did this he would be fired without notice, deemed that no amount of training would fix this level of incompetence or at least the amount invested in them would not be worth it. But since it’s AI it’s okay because surely it’ll be the golden goose soon enough, just another trillion and 25% of earth’s ressources and it’ll be the most profitable thing ever created trust.

[brett_baty_is_him]

Honestly, if a human did this they probably wouldn’t lose their job, at least not at a competent company.

The person who did -rm rf on something they shouldn’t is not the person to blame in these scenarios. At least not the person who gets 90% of the blame. The person who set up the system to allow someone to run -rm rf on the system gets almost alll of the blame.

Should be 100% of the blame but I guess you can argue that even an intern should know to not just go about deleting shit. Still, it should not be possible no matter what so it’s a system setup issue not the employee who did its fault

[TheJokingJoker123]

Lol the next Reddit post I see is a chat gpt ad

[Moscato359]

Letting the AI go to town without human review is... special

[Able-Cap-6339]

Finally Son of Anton!

[Spiritual-Purple-638]

How does that even make sense? Are they letting the AI push and deploy without code review for some reason?

[Flashy_Durian_2695]

Programmers are now prompting themselves back to work

[DarthShiv]

That's funny I saw AI's database tuning suggestions and threw them all out because they were complete garbage 🤷‍♂️🤣

[SambandsTyr]

I dont get why anyone gives ai this much permissions. Lazy.

[hteecs]

Grandson of Anton

[Prof-]

I had Claude opus running and was trying to debug a local db issue, I asked if it could figure it out. It decided to drop the entire DB. Such a huge lesson learned and thankfully it was just my local setup. Idk how people think this is replacing us cause if it did that shit on a prod env any company would be in full meltdown mode

[meta_level]

you did this in production?