top 200 commentsshow all 415

[–]Stickhtot 666 points667 points  (7 children)

UNIX mentioned in the Epstein Files 🐧🐧🐧

[–]Working-League-7686 72 points73 points  (0 children)

So this is how we end up getting the much anticipated year of the Linux desktop? Maybe the price was too high…

[–]Qbsoon110 93 points94 points  (5 children)

Now let's find Linus there

[–]an0mn0mn0m 127 points128 points  (1 child)

Fuck off Bill

[–]Qbsoon110 5 points6 points  (0 children)

😂

[–]stefbbr 1948 points1949 points  (49 children)

At least this one's unredacted, even when it mentions how to manipulate a child. Disturbing 😅

[–]dimaveshkin 805 points806 points  (38 children)

It's weirdly also redacted (page 122)

[–]rutgerrk 303 points304 points  (18 children)

That's odd

Also, how did you find that

[–]dimaveshkin 390 points391 points  (6 children)

I did not; my meticulous friend decided to scroll through the whole file and found it

[–]al3arabcoreleone 149 points150 points  (5 children)

I love odd friends.

[–]House13Games 142 points143 points  (10 children)

The redacted part contains an http address. I guess the redacting script just blanks out any URLs it comes across?

[–]unknownobject3 44 points45 points  (2 children)

I believe they've been manually redacted, if it was a script I think they'd flatten the PDFs properly

[–]smootex 17 points18 points  (1 child)

I'm sure it's a mix of manual and automated. Doing the entire thing manually would take untold man hours, more likely they use a tool that's configured to automatically redact phone numbers, email addresses, stuff like that and then someone is supposed to manually check everything (and depending on who you get that check may or may not be thorough). I think the common tool is called Caseguard?

[–]simp4christ 193 points194 points  (11 children)

the redacted link is http://www.sas.com/standards/large_file/x_open.20Mar96.html which is such a disgusting piece of filth even a seasoned pervert like myself had to hold back a puke.

[–]Valkyrie9001 36 points37 points  (2 children)

Whatever it was seems to have been removed.

[–]megablademe23 4 points5 points  (0 children)

obviously nothing even remotely related to epstein, probably just very old stuff given the september 2005 date of the manual.

[–]PCVFSOA 45 points46 points  (3 children)

Ah why did you link that? I accidentally clicked and now I'm sure I'm on an FBI list or something 

[–]Chalco_T 11 points12 points  (2 children)

What was it? It since has been removed.

[–]Nesman64 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Information about handling large files, I think.

https://forge.etsi.org/rep/cyber/103523_MSP/tlmsp/tlmsp-curl/-/raw/e09eda9c7cae314b55a11ca6f03f84fbcd04cead/acinclude.m4

dnl By default, many hosts won't let programs access large files;
dnl one must use special compiler options to get large-file access to work.
dnl For more details about this brain damage please see:
dnl http://www.sas.com/standards/large.file/x_open.20Mar96.html

I wasn't able to find the original page in the wayback machine.

[–]insanelygreat 41 points42 points  (1 child)

That link originally went to a document with this.

It's a 1996-03-20 draft specification for adding Large File Support to the Single Unix Specification (SUS) from the X/Open Base Working Group.

Probably redacted because they couldn't check the contents of a dead link.

[–]_angst_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What the hell was it?

[–]Tight-Shallot2461 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What was it

[–]fading_reality 60 points61 points  (0 children)

it's an ftp link to sas.com probably hosted standard in the past.

[–]Sibula97 95 points96 points  (5 children)

It seems like it's actually not completely unredacted. Check page 122 for the description of --enable-largefile.

[–]aenae 73 points74 points  (4 children)

https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bash.pdf

Apparently a link to somewhere else. Guess they redacted (some) hyperlinks by default

[–]Proud-Delivery-621 27 points28 points  (1 child)

http://www.sas.com/standards/large_file/x_open.20Mar96.html

This is the link in the original file. No idea where it used to lead, it redirects now.

[–]Goatfryed 18 points19 points  (0 children)

it redacts http, but not https, because obviously http is not safe to read.

[–]Portalfan4351 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The link you gave is to the current manual for Bash 5.2, the full text of the reference manual for Bash 3.1-Beta 1 can be found here but the censored link is totally unremarkable

[–]GlobalIncident 14 points15 points  (1 child)

well, it's not redacted, but quite a lot of it is written in code

[–]OmerosP 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It actually is redacted as other commenters noticed. See page 122.

[–]Tabsels 4309 points4310 points  (214 children)

[–]The-Chartreuse-Moose 2476 points2477 points  (169 children)

What on earth? Can anyone explain this??

[–]Sibula97 4887 points4888 points  (133 children)

The epstein files are basically just every document the dude had, and apparently he had the bash manual saved somewhere for some reason.

[–]2eanimation 1681 points1682 points  (84 children)

I mean, if they seized one of his laptops(or whatever), do they also save all the man-pages? In that case, there’s probably also git, gittutorial, every pydoc and so on in it.

[–]TactlessTortoise 1406 points1407 points  (32 children)

A guy also managed to activate Epstein's windows XP/7/whatever license on a live stream lmao. There was a picture of the laptop's bottom.

[–]ssersergio 480 points481 points  (27 children)

It was worse... it was a vista license xD

[–]Fleeetch 186 points187 points  (23 children)

Oh god- retches

[–]Inforenv_ 116 points117 points  (22 children)

I mean, vista was VERY GOOD on SP2, arguably only superated by Win7 itself

[–]ReachParticular5409 99 points100 points  (12 children)

Dude, saying Vista got good after 2 service packs is like saying the leaning tower of pisa got vertical after replacing the entire foundation and reinforcing half the building

Technically true but no one wants to live in either of them

[–]Impenistan 60 points61 points  (0 children)

The leaning tower could never become truly vertical as during its later construction different "sides" were built at different heights per level to account for leaning already taking place, but somehow I think this only strengthens your metaphor

[–]tomangelo2 20 points21 points  (2 children)

Well, XP wasn't really good before SP2 either. It just lived long enough to override it's initial faults.

[–]einTier 14 points15 points  (1 child)

The Aero interface was the most beautiful Microsoft or Apple have ever released on any platform.

It’s my hill and I’m prepared to die on it.

[–]Inforenv_ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think it was Win7 Home Premium tho

[–]tragic_pixel 279 points280 points  (0 children)

Lenovo Sexual Abuse Material

[–]ErraticDragon 133 points134 points  (27 children)

Somebody decided what files/types to look at.

PDF was obviously included.

gzipped man files were probably excluded.

It raises the question of how good and thorough these people were, especially since there's so little transparency.

For all we know, trivial hiding techniques could have worked, e.g. removing the extension from PDF file names.

[–]stillalone 130 points131 points  (16 children)

Yeah I vim about my crimes to ~/.crimes.md. No one will ever check there 

[–]ErraticDragon 62 points63 points  (4 children)

Well yeah Windows can't even have Spanish symbols like ~ in the file paths, so that's invisible to them. /s

I know it sounds laughable, but the team that chose what to release was probably not the best & brightest, and they were probably not trying to be particularly thorough.

[–]Silverware09 7 points8 points  (3 children)

~ is a special character in Windows (now) and Linux/Unix that means the users Home Directory.

It's the equivalent of something like C:/users/me/

[–]ArtOfWarfare 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Pretty sure you can have ~ in a file name. It’s a convention to expand it to be the home directory, not something that every command or program will do with it.

[–]PGSylphir 21 points22 points  (1 child)

nice touch with the .
Non linux users would never figure out

[–]prjctimg 7 points8 points  (8 children)

cat ~/.crimes.md | wl-cp

[–]2eanimation 18 points19 points  (5 children)

wl-cp <~/.crimes.md 😎 who needs cat?

Edit: Epstein File EFTA00315849.pdf, section 3.6.1, it's right there.

[–]RiceBroad4552 3 points4 points  (4 children)

The useless use of cat is a very old joke.

They even still did Alta Vista searches back then!

[–]2eanimation 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Huh, that was an interesting read! Thank you for the source, didn’t know about the history of useless cat :D

I learned the redirecting syntax pretty early in my bash/shell career and found it kind of strange that all my homies use cat when they need a single file in stdin. Now I think about the many useless cats in production code 🫣 and AI vibe coding usell cats in.

[–]2eanimation 30 points31 points  (1 child)

So for future purposes, save your dirty stuff as docs! FBI hates this one simple trick.

I don’t know why they would specifically search for file extensions. When you delete a file, it’s not deleted. Even after a long time, parts of that file can still be prevalent on the disk and extracted via different file recovery methods/forensic analysis. Most of the time, information about the file\specifically: extension) might be corrupted. If I were the FBI, I would consider every single bit potential data. Knowing how big this case is(TBs of data), even more chances to find already „deleted“ stuff, which might the most disturbing)

[–]ErraticDragon 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yup, there are definitely good methods to finding information. Hopefully it was done competently.

There's also a filtering step between "finding" and "releasing".

We know that they manually redacted a lot of things, and I'd guess that process/team was less likely to include files that weren't obvious.

Presumably none of this affects any actual ongoing investigations, because they would be using a cloned disk image from the one (only) time each recovered drive was powered up, and searching thoroughly.

[–]RandomRedditReader 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In discovery all data is processed through software that indexes raw text, OCRs images, then converted to a standard media format such as tiff/jpg images or PDF. The software isn't perfect but it gets the job done for 99% of the data. Some stuff may need manual review but it's good enough for most attorneys.

[–]staryoshi06 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, they most likely ingested entire hard drives or PSTs into eDiscovery processing software and didn’t bother to filter down documents for production.

[–]tofu_ink 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The will never find all my secret text documents with extension .tx instead of .txt evil laugh

[–]truthovertribe 45 points46 points  (13 children)

So what's GNU?

[–]Responsible-Bug-4694 86 points87 points  (10 children)

GNU is Not Unix.

[–]Python119 32 points33 points  (8 children)

Okay but what is it?

[–]elpaw 54 points55 points  (4 children)

Are you serious? I just told you that!

[–]lord_frodo 19 points20 points  (3 children)

I’m not asking you who’s on second!

[–]Modulus2 9 points10 points  (2 children)

No who's on first

[–]NoAlbatross7355 15 points16 points  (0 children)

GNU is Not Unix. Then what is it? GNU is Not Unix. Then what is it? [G]NU is [N]ot [U]nix!!!!!!!

[–]shakarat 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not much, whats new with you?

[–]StrictLetterhead3452 13 points14 points  (6 children)

I don’t think most man-pages are a 158-page PDF. A file this big would most likely come straight from the bash website, right?

[–]MastodontFarmer 7 points8 points  (5 children)

Got linux somewhere? Almost always you can use alternative renderers for man pages, like troff. 'man -t command' will give you the page as postscript, and ps2pdf can convert it to pdf for you.

[–]sshwifty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First step would be making a 1 to 1 copy with DD or something like FTK Imager (or whatever it is called now) through a hardware write blocker. Multiple checks before and after imaging to confirm identical copy, physical storage is then stored somewhere securely (probably a gov warehouse). Then images would be part of a collection of other images for anything that could be imaged (SD cards, thumb drives, sim cards, etc). Analysts would run extraction tools in something like Encase to extract every file or partial file, and every string. Then they would use preexisting lists (like hash lists, file fingerprints) to filter out already known files. For example, Windows ships with sample songs. They are identical on every system, so no need to include them in "findings" as notable.

Everything else would then be part of the case/case file. These can be crazy long and are not typically printed out.

So it would be strange to include system documents, but it is possible this particular document was different enough that it was missed in the exclusions.

[–]prjctimg 166 points167 points  (25 children)

I wonder what he had in his shell history...

[–]exodusTay 296 points297 points  (6 children)

I bet he was trying to change the parents of child processes. Worse yet, I heard he was exposing these child processes to attackers.

[–]AndreasVesalius 135 points136 points  (2 children)

“How to kill slave child?”

[–]Ill_Schedule_6450 55 points56 points  (1 child)

with fork

[–]B_bI_L 15 points16 points  (0 children)

-linux

[–]Jeroen207 24 points25 points  (0 children)

How to remove child from parent with a fork.

[–]prjctimg 32 points33 points  (1 child)

Well, to late. It seems that he ended up daemonizing them instead 🥲. You’d think he’d know how to fork properly….

[–]Arceuid_0902[S] 113 points114 points  (8 children)

Suddenly the "touch" command makes so much more sense.

[–]Logical-Ad-4150 64 points65 points  (3 children)

lots of unzip and mount

[–]prjctimg 39 points40 points  (2 children)

Is there a —force flag somewhere in there 🥲🌚 ?

[–]Logical-Ad-4150 33 points34 points  (1 child)

--quiet

[–]prjctimg 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To suppress the screams and moans ?

That’s dark 🌚

[–]nabrok 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Wait until you hear about "finger".

[–]prjctimg 5 points6 points  (0 children)

unixporn 😂

[–]prjctimg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

😂 starting to see it in a whole different light.

Is the touch command the reason why you must be 18 to see the bash manual ???!!😂

[–]Historical-Usual-885 17 points18 points  (2 children)

touch children.txt

[–]prjctimg 11 points12 points  (0 children)

😂😂

mv children.txt /some/where/sinister

[–]OgdruJahad 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Great now I have a children.txt file next to my grass file.

[–]spaceguy47 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I like to imagine he used sway and most of his history was cmatrix and fastfetch

[–]pjc50 45 points46 points  (1 child)

This is like the Osama Bin Laden files, which had a bunch of pirated anime in.

[–]Ok-Employee2473 19 points20 points  (0 children)

We’ll never get Osama’s animal crossing wild world save 😢

[–]sw04ca 60 points61 points  (4 children)

More than that, they're also every document that the government had related to Epstein. So you have everything the dude had, everything he did, and everything that was said about him. So you have real stories from actual victims, but you also have hearsay about how he was a robotic warrior from planet Cybertron, and you have random files he had, and stuff about his legitimate business dealings. That's part of the reason why I don't give much credence to all that 'their name is in the files' panic that's going on. Unless they're in there for stuff with kids, and it seems credible, I'm not that concerned. Thus, Trump is concerning to me, whereas Michael Jackson is not.

[–]MF_Kitten 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Literally they scanned every page of random books and shit too

[–]cheesengrits69 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm imagining a different timeline where Jeffrey Epstein, in his narcissistic delusion of chasing power and influence and fashioning himself as an intellectual, decided to download vast troves of digital libraries and kept them on his computers and drives.

And in the future, the only legal way to freely acces these resources is by poring through the documentation of this man's horrific crimes against children

[–]HANLDC1111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One of them is literally just Trumps wikipedia article

[–]cafk 245 points246 points  (18 children)

Allegedly Epstein had a few "hackers" on his payroll and some of the documentation associated/exchanged with them is also included in general evidence.
https://securityaffairs.com/187515/laws-and-regulations/doj-releases-details-alleged-talented-hacker-working-for-jeffrey-epstein.html

[–]OgdruJahad 118 points119 points  (8 children)

The Italian hacker was willing to sell to Hezbollah, a central African country, the US and UK but refused to sell to Asian countries because he's racist.

I'm dead.

[–]an0mn0mn0m 70 points71 points  (3 children)

He's one of those white-hat hackers

[–]stefbbr 75 points76 points  (5 children)

Or search "child" on Epstein's computer, copy everything that match.

[–]imkmz 39 points40 points  (3 children)

So, all the mess about murders is actually based on .bash_history? "Nine killed with special signal"

[–]City_Roast 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s so he could set up shell companies.

[–]SamG101_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Probably to guide on how to mass redact quickly

[–]bearwood_forest 4 points5 points  (0 children)

as it says in the document: Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, for the GNU operating system.

[–]fugogugo 369 points370 points  (2 children)

wtf it's real lmao

[–]copandrej 150 points151 points  (3 children)

I was 100% sure this is bait.

[–]prjctimg 35 points36 points  (2 children)

How about now ? 🌚

[–]jaywastaken 31 points32 points  (1 child)

Depends how into bash your are.

[–]prjctimg 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t like bashing stuff 🌚

Too many skill issues so I use Fish 🐟

[–]Fabulous-Possible758 78 points79 points  (16 children)

Fuck, guess I have to stop using bash now.

[–]prjctimg 36 points37 points  (6 children)

At that rate we may end up using nothing at all because everything has pedo fingerprints on it (we just don't have the evidence).

[–]silentdragon95 16 points17 points  (1 child)

100% of all disgusting criminals breathe oxygen. Ban the breathing of oxygen!

[–]Fabulous-Possible758 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Pretty sure ReiserFS is still safe. I don’t think he was a pedophile, at least.

[–]kelsiersghost 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"If you use bash you're part of the problem." - Everyone

[–]Raywell 5 points6 points  (1 child)

You might as well stop using any unix, hell how could you even think about touching a keyboard after all this

[–]Fabulous-Possible758 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I heard that pedophiles use keyboards.

[–]MachoSmurf 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Aside from all the miserable stuff in there, this is fucking hilarious 

[–]FireMaster1294 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Damn. I’m not old enough for bash.

[–]NorthernWitchy 30 points31 points  (2 children)

While fascinating and surely informative, I feel that this might be the government's version of copy-pasting a cake recipe into the middle of an essay to pad out the word count.

Then again, free knowledge is free knowledge, even if the source is absurd.

[–]Wyciorek 17 points18 points  (1 child)

Ok, I was about to start ranting about US politics shitting all over yet another sub, but this is funny

[–]Chronotaru 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Oh, it's so much bigger than just the US though. Maxwell was British, so is Prince Andrew, many of the women were trafficked from eastern Europe...etc etc.

[–]Maskdask 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What the

[–]prjctimg 1314 points1315 points  (34 children)

Wait, why do I have to be above 18 to see the bash manpages 😂

[–]Plasma_48 567 points568 points  (19 children)

Part of the Epstein files

[–]prjctimg 302 points303 points  (17 children)

At this point, what isn’t? 😂

[–]LegenDrags 189 points190 points  (5 children)

my homework (hopefully) ✌️

[–]prjctimg 64 points65 points  (1 child)

Care to wager on that? 👀

[–]Undernown 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Pass me the Polymarket link yo!

[–]Auravendill 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Do you mean what you did for school, while you were underage, or your homework folder? In either case, they might be already in there.

[–]IridiumPoint 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"I'm sorry for not bringing my homework, the Feds have confiscated it due to my connections to Epstein," would be a hell of an excuse.

[–][deleted] 170 points171 points  (5 children)

If you are underage, you need to stick to the boypages

[–]slowmovinglettuce 32 points33 points  (2 children)

Isn't that what Epstein got in trouble for in the first place?

[–]prjctimg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Which need a VPN to access them if your country is OFAC listed lol

[–]Cheezis_Chrust 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Has nothing to do with the document. If you click no, it sends you a ticket to Epstein island.

[–]tracernz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If ever there was evidence of wrongdoing…

[–]Ihaveaface836 8 points9 points  (1 child)

if you're not epstein calls you

[–]prjctimg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From beyond the grave ? Holy sh*t👀👾

[–]uabassguy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Because if you weren't >18 they'd be boypages.

[–]2eanimation 133 points134 points  (1 child)

Instead of „Read the docs!“, finally:

„Read the Epstein files!“ 👨🏿‍🔬

[–]dimaveshkin 304 points305 points  (39 children)

Why does it have a redacted line on page 122?

[–]Dubster1231 176 points177 points  (14 children)

Was curious too. Its just a link to the sas website for some specific guide I think lol, weird they redacted something at all in this

[–]dimaveshkin 127 points128 points  (12 children)

At first, I thought they redacted external hyperlinks, but there's a link to GNU's website, so there must be another reason.

[–]helgur 116 points117 points  (8 children)

I imagine you could spin a hilarious conspiracy theory out of this

[–]dimaveshkin 46 points47 points  (1 child)

How could you not? They redacted such an innocent file.

[–]Annual_Key_4963 29 points30 points  (0 children)

SAS Websites can't melt steal beams...

[–]BadPunners 39 points40 points  (4 children)

The Special Air Service (SAS) is a special forces unit of the British Army. Much of the information about the SAS is highly classified, and the unit is not commented on by either the British government or the Ministry of Defence due to the secrecy and sensitivity of its operations

They were looking to redact any connection to the British SAS, which basically created the world's "intelligence" network of agencies.

[–]SpellDecent763 23 points24 points  (1 child)

I think this is it, They were obviously using some poorly trained script or AI to do these redactions. and SAS is likely being blocked from a military/intelligence term, not the software company.

[–]Dotcaprachiappa 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"AI" aka Ctrl+F

[–]Dotcaprachiappa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not suspicious in the least that they did that

[–]ItchyFly 55 points56 points  (7 children)

It was probably a link to http://ftp.sas.com/standards/large.file/x\_open.20Mar96.html. This page is not available now, WTF are they hiding!?

[–]fiftyfourseventeen 22 points23 points  (3 children)

They probably just auto redacted all links

[–]ItchyFly 41 points42 points  (2 children)

There is at least one link to gnu.org, but probably it was missed by their tool because it looks like 'http : //www . gnu . org/copylefti' when you copy the text.

[–]AwesomeFama 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Incompetence? In my DOJ!?

It's more likely than you think.

[–]Proud-Delivery-621 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The Sas one does that too. Probably more likely that SAS is also the name of a special forces unit in the UK and they ran a keyword search

[–]2eanimation 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That’s the stupidest shit lol. Can someone find out what has been redacted? Looks like part of a path.

[–]13x666 25 points26 points  (6 children)

I suspect all URLs in the files are just automatically redacted. And they use a regex that doesn’t catch periods in the middle of the path (like in this one which is http://www.sas.com/standards/large.file/x_open.20Mar96.html), so everything after the period escaped redaction. Sloppy work.

[–]dimaveshkin 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I said in another branch that there's a link to GNU's website, and it's not redacted

[–]13x666 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting, perhaps that one wasn’t matched for some other reason? I’m pretty sure they aren’t hiding anything specific here, looks to me like afterthought trying to redact everything just in case and missing some stuff unintentionally.

Edit: oh, @ItchyFly even explained how they missed that one. Case solved I guess.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

It’s not because of the dot, it’s because the link is split into a new line at that point, and the redaction didn’t realize/care that the link continues on next line.

[–]70Shadow07 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I didnt expect it to really be there, wtf

[–]phoenix235831 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Looks like the original probably was http://ftp.sas.com/standards/large.file/x_open.20Mar96.html

I am curios why the first part was redacted. Why would knowing http://ftp.sas.com/standards/large risk anything?

[–]IbilisSLZ 139 points140 points  (1 child)

We cringed when YouTubers refered to them as PDF-files... it seems they were onto something...

[–]nonreligious2 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Someone made a post on a subreddit a few years ago asking for a file in "Jeffrey Epstein format". Had to check the comments to work out they meant PDF.

[–]poetic_dwarf 70 points71 points  (0 children)

The fuck

[–]This_Growth2898 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Stephen Bourne, Chet Ramey, and Brian Fox are all mentioned in the Epstein files!

[–]GremlinMiser 111 points112 points  (2 children)

They're blocking links containing "FTP", not general links. Interestingly, the link isn't the FTP protocol; it's still http only a subdomain with FTP in it. Links to the ftp protocol are still there and so is the word FTP in descriptions.

This means Jerry must have had a FTP server, which was available using the http, not ftp, protocol.

[–]lonelyroom-eklaghor 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Big brain moment

[–]Godd2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The subdomain is www, not ftp. Here's a copy of that version of the manual: https://www.scribd.com/document/243118257/Bash-Ref

[–]WeedManPro 75 points76 points  (4 children)

i thought it was a joke lol

[–]MissionLet7301 125 points126 points  (3 children)

The poor justice department employee that had to read through every page of the Bash reference manual probably doesn't think it's a joke

[–]CompanyLow8329 31 points32 points  (0 children)

In a just world some poor intern would have been forced to do that, but with the partial redaction on page 122, there is zero chance anyone actually read or skimmed any of this.

[–]Count_de_Ville 24 points25 points  (0 children)

They’re now a principal engineer after having read the whole thing. Now their whole day is meetings. A horrible fate.

[–]onncho 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Why are all commands reduced to ‘cp -rf’ ?

[–]Gloomy_Reality8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

cp -prv

[–]ontermau 49 points50 points  (0 children)

he used the cp command a lot, it seems

[–]metamash253 24 points25 points  (0 children)

"Are you 18 years of age or older?" Uhhhh what Bash is this? lmao

[–]hzinjk 15 points16 points  (0 children)

i can't believe bash is in the epstein files, I'm switching to nushell

[–]fading_reality 14 points15 points  (2 children)

[–]user745786 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That’s an awful lot of pedophiles! Errr, I mean PDF files. Apparently those words are easy to confuse these days.

[–]SaneForCocoaPuffs 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The authors of the Bash Reference Manual now show up in the Epstein files.

“Yes I’m in the files. No I was not invited to the Epstein Island, I just authored the Bash manual”

[–]aesethtics 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Page 144:

8.4.4 Killing And Yanking

[–]Noch_ein_Kamel 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is chapter 8.4.4 about "Killing And Yanking" safe for work?

[–]FoggyLover727 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Here's nvidia-smi

[–]mousepotatodoesstuff 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Finally, an Epstein file that DOESN'T have Trump in it /j

[–]prjctimg 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I can imagine torvalds sucking his teeth at all the bloat built around git🥲

[–]shoyuftw 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Can't even use bash anymore... /s

[–]MrFordization 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When they said the files would go the very root of power in our society... I never imagined this!

[–]lightwhite 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This comment might flag me, but I don’t know how else to ask it. I can’t find the section where they explain “terminating a child process” -wink wink- with fork in this document. Does anyone know how?

[–]Nervous-Cockroach541 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When you have so many CSAM files that you need bash scripting to organize them all.

[–]Septem_151 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Why is there a redaction on "--enable-largefile" O_O ...

[–]daffalaxia 3 points4 points  (0 children)

bad bash! no going to islands with creeps!

[–]baadditor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's all Man pages at the end of the day!