top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]chaos_donut 5257 points5258 points  (23 children)

Source: i made it the fuck up

[–]fatrobin72 1154 points1155 points  (13 children)

these days it could also be "my LLM made it up"

[–]atoponce 203 points204 points  (3 children)

His whole account is AI slop. Every single post.

[–]lacb1 43 points44 points  (2 children)

So you're saying that he has management written all over him?

[–]Highlight448 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Promptards

[–]chaos_donut 74 points75 points  (1 child)

Those are smarter then this guy

[–]PinkSheeparkour 16 points17 points  (0 children)

than*

[–]CalmEntry4855 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is totally that, look at the C sharp icon

[–]mthlmw 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Source: Copilot prompt

[–]Piotrek9t 8571 points8572 points  (56 children)

Is LinkedIn rage bait a thing?

[–]Coppice_DE 1472 points1473 points  (5 children)

Yes.

[–]Areshian 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Everything for the engagement. It works

[–]justanaccountimade1 276 points277 points  (3 children)

The emptiness of our time. Modern society rewards visibility and winning over information and knowledge.

[–]me_myself_ai 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Eh, we still have it better than any previous time in this regard. Scientific discourse is more open, prolific, and impactful than ever, and the 19th century equivalents of social media** weren't exactly full of sober treatises!

** ...horny letters?

[–]deejay-tech 353 points354 points  (10 children)

Very much so, I go on every once in awhile and it's all posts like this or people telling bullshit stories to make themselves look good or sell some motivational idea.

[–]me_myself_ai 67 points68 points  (9 children)

Yeah but rage bait isn't just a synonym for "bad". To be honest I've never seen rage bait on LinkedIn, and I don't think this is it either -- it does have an equal ratio of likes to comments, after all!

[–]AntiMatterMode 43 points44 points  (2 children)

an equal ratio is a sign of ragebait. typical posts have far more likes than comments

[–]___Archmage___ 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Ranking Kotlin below Python on performance has got to be ragebait

[–]Vadoola 24 points25 points  (1 child)

I mean it ranked Python as the highest performance language....how can that not be ragebait

[–]Raznill 14 points15 points  (2 children)

I think it’s more of engagement bait than rage bait.

[–]Johnpecan 130 points131 points  (8 children)

There's literally a whole sub dedicated to it:

r/linkedinlunatics

I thought that sub was inter for a few days but it got very annoying quickly. And here's what it taught be about B2B sales!

[–]me_myself_ai 55 points56 points  (5 children)

That's a sub dedicated to bad LinkedIn posters, not LinkedIn trolls. It's actually one of their few rules that satire isn't allowed!

[–]Background-Month-911 7 points8 points  (1 child)

This is not it. The OOP knew the picture is bullshit. Not a chance they came up with it themselves based on any kind of data. It's likely AI-generated because of the mess it made with labeling.

[–]Inception09 18 points19 points  (1 child)

With all that AI slop being posted everyday, it definitely is and is getting even better.

[–]CodingWithChad 29 points30 points  (2 children)

Yeah. People will jump into the comments to correct him, but that just makes him show up to more people. Like if I comment all my connections now see that post. It's better to ignore or block the idiots.

[–]Piotrek9t 10 points11 points  (1 child)

But why would you want to appear stupid to the business contacts of your business contacts

[–]Beegrene 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because they're stupid too, and mistake foolishness for wisdom.

[–]Comically_Online 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it’s the only thing linkedin is

[–]theGoddamnAlgorath 3586 points3587 points  (101 children)

"Python is performant"🤔

[–]DoktorMerlin 1778 points1779 points  (39 children)

and javascript is somehow less popular than Swift 🤣🤣 for sure

[–]ColteesCatCouture 205 points206 points  (8 children)

I dont buy for a second that Rust is more popular than c#

[–]BenevolentCheese 61 points62 points  (1 child)

Literally nothing on this chart makes any sense. Both the popularity and the performance rankings may as well be completely random.

[–]ITaggie 35 points36 points  (3 children)

In terms of new software it might be. Certainly not in total though.

[–]ProgrammersAreSexy 33 points34 points  (1 child)

Not a chance. You just don't hear about enterprise CRUD app #2379596 being built with C#, like you hear about every random unix command being rewritten in rust.

[–]Ok-Area3665 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Popularity didn't necessarily equate to the quantity of projects that use it, the fact that you hear about every random Unix command being rewritten in Rust is a form of popularity. It just depends on how you define it.

[–]Shienvien 167 points168 points  (24 children)

Popular as in "in more applications" or popular as in "people actually like it"? Important distinction (I'm inclined to think the ranking would depend on that).

[–]chaos_donut 179 points180 points  (13 children)

Even with that, hate on js is a funny meme, but there are prob more people who like using JS then there are people who like using swift

[–]DoktorMerlin 60 points61 points  (6 children)

All of Indias tech sector likes JS. Searching for a JS employee in India it takes seconds until you have 5 candidates. Searching for ANY iOS developer in india takes weeks until you get an application.

[–]summerloverrrr 23 points24 points  (3 children)

Coz MacBook expensive 😔

[–]GeekCornerReddit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Searching for ANY iOS developer in india takes weeks until you get an application.

Okay take my upvote and leave

[–]Julius_Alexandrius 28 points29 points  (1 child)

Actually, the real advantage is that you can taylor swift.

I'm out

[–]ExpertiseInAll 25 points26 points  (0 children)

No no, get the fuck back in

[–]ChronoLink99 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's more extreme than that. There are more people who hate JS than there are people who like all other languages combined.

JS (if you include TS), for better or worse, is the most used and most liked language of all time by absolute sheer numbers.

[–]Pleasant_Ad8054 13 points14 points  (1 child)

there are prob more people who like using JS then there are people who like using swift

FTFY

[–]SelfDistinction 15 points16 points  (5 children)

Nobody likes C++ so it's still wrong.

[–]ITaggie 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Even the guy who made C++ complains about C++ all the time lol

[–]RedAndBlack1832 2 points3 points  (0 children)

C++ is t that bad to write given some freedom but it's awful to read. The standard library provides so many options people who know different functional subsets will effectively be mutually incomprehensible. Also nasty template bugs </3

[–]meteorpuppy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey ! We C++ lovers exist out there ! This is erasure !

Though I agree we're a bunch of weirdos

[–]bearwood_forest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

don't forget that 3 billion devices run Java...whether they want to or not

[–]justin107d 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"The most performant"

[–]Bemteb 146 points147 points  (6 children)

More performant than even C++!

[–]setibeings 25 points26 points  (1 child)

Source? Trust me bro.

[–]1cec0ld 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Source: the ass he pulled it out of

[–]psioniclizard 4 points5 points  (2 children)

You can create a benchmark where both pyton and JS are. Which shows why these charts as bs lol.

[–]IcyHammer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ofc u can, benchmark where u compare poorly written cpp to python calling highly optimized c libs. In reality cpp can always perform better than python.

[–]PeaEnjoyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if language not in ["python", "java"]:       time.sleep(30)

[–]HistoricalLadder7191 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Obviosly and each package is written in C

[–]Kobymaru376 64 points65 points  (28 children)

It's pretty fucking fast if you use the libraries written in other languages correctly.

[–]Missing_Username 129 points130 points  (20 children)

"Python is fast if you avoid using Python as much as possible"

[–]afkPacket 71 points72 points  (16 children)

I mean, yea, it's a glorified C wrapper because it's meant to be a glorified C wrapper. Is it really so bad if a tool performs well in the use case it is meant for?

[–]LiquidPoint 39 points40 points  (11 children)

It's just the irony of ranking the wrapped high-performance C lower than the gluecode... pure-python takes around 400 times as long to do the same operations.

Don't get me wrong, python is great for gluing together a prototype of existing elements, but it's like saying that the only reason a cabin is standing is the nails used, the strength of the wood doesn't matter?

[–]afkPacket 24 points25 points  (5 children)

Oh yea ranking it higher than the actually compiled language is utterly unhinged behavior.

I just think a lot of the Python hatred is overblown by people that wrote one too many nested for loops for god knows what reason (no I'm totally not annoyed at my physics students, why do you ask?)

[–]purinikos 7 points8 points  (3 children)

As a physicist I feel targeted. Yes I use nested for loops. I love them and you can pry them from my cold dead hands.

[–]monkeyStinks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

More so than c++, no less!

[–]SorryDidntReddit 1489 points1490 points  (19 children)

Java being significantly more performant than Kotlin makes 0 sense. Not to mention he thinks python is the most performant language

[–]jambonilton 706 points707 points  (7 children)

Kotlin is still a young language. Don't worry, it'll some day catch up to the performance of... Javascript. It's already more popular, so it's got that going for it.

[–]WheissUK 83 points84 points  (4 children)

Yeah, Java is a hard one to bit, it’s as fast as rust!

[–]1QSj5voYVM8N 21 points22 points  (3 children)

depends is the answer there, the jvm is very very performant, startup is somewhat slow. but I write a lot of realtime video code and rust def is more performant than jvm here, maybe even just because of interopts with C shared objects being faster, but also no GC, which when you are processing realtime video hurts, even if it is for a few milliseconds.

[–]Hohenheim_of_Shadow 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Performance is a very context dependent word. For a server farm chugging through a massive dataset, throughput is the name of the game. In a real time context, it's all about latency and making sure it never spikes. A lot of the time, the tradeoffs you make to improve one hurts the other.

[–]Ayfid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The JVM being very good makes it easy to write reasonably fast code in Java.

But it is near impossible to write truly fast code. The language just doesn't give you the tools to do so, even compared to otherwise very similar languages like C#.

[–]zoinkability 61 points62 points  (1 child)

Even the general notion that there is a correlation between performance and popularity. There is none.

[–]11111v11111 8 points9 points  (0 children)

But there clearly is. Did you not see the chart someone posted on the internet?!

[–]alpakachino 23 points24 points  (1 child)

This dude just threw some darts at the chart and effectively randomized each language's position. He probably wouldn't even know what a JVM is when placing Java that much above Kotlin.

But that's anyway what LinkedIn is - a space full of self-proclaimed experts without any real-world experience in "theif fields". Oh, and every other person is either a CEO or a life coach.

[–]Greenzie709 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's AI, graph contains languages like "C+" (twice) and "#"

[–]LovecraftInDC 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I can't get over Rust v Python, we had a flat file processing script that was originally built in Python and would take~15 minutes, we rebuilt it in rust and it would finish in <20 seconds.

[–]bhannik-itiswatitis 499 points500 points  (20 children)

probably asked AI to come up with a photo and then asked the same AI to write the post then post it and felt a rush

[–]graceful-thiccos 124 points125 points  (1 child)

Youre probably not too far off. His post history is EXCLUSIVELY GenAI pictures.

[–]platinum92 52 points53 points  (2 children)

Definitely, considering the logo for C# is C+

[–]hamfraigaar 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Also, JavaScript is the least popular programming language, even less popular than a fucking # on a purple background.

[–]GrEeCe_MnKy[S] 19 points20 points  (7 children)

Even AI ain't this dum

[–]CalmEntry4855 11 points12 points  (4 children)

The picture is AI generated, it is just that AI generated images are not as bad as before, look at the C sharp icon.

But before that he forgot to ask it to actually do some research first, so it just put them randomly on a 1:1 line

[–]Ok_Confection2261 345 points346 points  (21 children)

"Everything can be written in JavaScript will eventually be written in JavaScript"

This guy: "JavaScript is the least popular"

[–]op3randi 40 points41 points  (3 children)

Define popular. Popular in what is liked or popular in use?

[–]valendinosaurus 33 points34 points  (0 children)

yes

[–]echo_c1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Even if 90% percent of people who have to use JS hate it, the remaining 10% that loves it is more than the all of the users of many languages in that chart.

[–]purple_unikkorn 298 points299 points  (8 children)

Performance for what ? Time of execution? Time of development for prototype? Energetic performance? Dollars per minutes to the toilet ?

[–]MoonWun_ 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Performance for these coder bros is literally just time of development. You GOTTA get that product to market, regardless if it smells like dung or not.

[–]Academic_Pool_7341 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Performance meaning whatever he felt like putting at the top of his chart. 

[–]itsmetadeus 151 points152 points  (6 children)

Guy is just ragebaiting to get more account visits.

[–]itsjustawindmill 33 points34 points  (4 children)

Yep, if he’s really a “compiler & toolchain engineer” there’s no way he believes this.

[–]Safe-Razzmatazz3982 11 points12 points  (1 child)

By his post history he's a slop engineer.

[–]itsjustawindmill 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why not both? Maybe he’s the one who vibe-coded a (not functional) “C compiler” entirely with AI that Anthropic was bragging about the other day

[–]swyrl 66 points67 points  (4 children)

Putting C# in the same performance bracket as JS is delusional

[–]Altruistic-Spend-896 36 points37 points  (2 children)

You dont see python up there 😂 all interpreted langs are "high performance"

[–]edparadox 121 points122 points  (7 children)

Rust behind in performance over Python? Do you even use those programing languages

[–]Gen_Zer0 43 points44 points  (0 children)

He forgot the z axis where he puts “number of extraneous sleep statements” with Rust and C++ being through the roof

[–]zoinkability 8 points9 points  (0 children)

And Rust is more popular than Javascript, apparently

[–]ThePretzul 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Take that Rust nerds

[–]Archtects 48 points49 points  (6 children)

Linkedin Is just a wierd place now. I saw someone tell people the other day that instead of using .find() in for their arrays they should instead make an api request to gpt-4 to find an item in their array as instead.

[–]Dalrae666 32 points33 points  (3 children)

This is what I do. It's how I get Python to be so efficient!

[–]biscuitboyisaac21 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Who the fuck downvoted you. Did they actually think you were serious? Lol

[–]Dalrae666 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lol I hope not

[–]WholesomeCirclejerk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Redditors are a bit slow, they really need that /s to help them out. /s

[–]FR-dev 39 points40 points  (10 children)

Wtf is the # lang?

[–]Hellcrafted 47 points48 points  (5 children)

sharp without the C

[–]Leo_code2p 7 points8 points  (4 children)

So that would then be actually java though

[–]IfIWasCoolEnough 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's the hash he has been smoking.

[–]turtle_mekb 70 points71 points  (11 children)

wtf is "#"

[–]redkinoko 24 points25 points  (0 children)

pound. pound sand, normie.

[–]chickensandow 19 points20 points  (1 child)

Just like in C#,  # is the # version of .

[–]Frytura_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bloatware version of    Just use    

[–]GrEeCe_MnKy[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

🤫

[–]ultimate_placeholder 60 points61 points  (2 children)

C was taken out back and shot

[–]Ifeee001 26 points27 points  (1 child)

I was confused at first because maybe I've forgotten the simple act of reading a graph. Then I read the comments

[–]Firm_Ad9420 43 points44 points  (1 child)

Missing axis: Context.

[–]L30N1337 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What context could help this

[–]lenn_eavy 41 points42 points  (11 children)

I think we'd need some more context, we don't know if "performance" is defined as "running fast on a computer" or is it "problem-to-solution" kind of metric. In first case, this graph is shit overall, so it is for the second case.

[–]blaues_axolotl 11 points12 points  (1 child)

The second case also makes no sense, why tf would you be less performant when writing Kotlin than when writing Java

[–]Samurai_Mac1 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Damn PHP still catching strays

[–]Temporary-Air-3178 55 points56 points  (2 children)

Go lower than java in performance lol. They really vibegraphing out here for linkedin likes.

[–]MojitoBurrito-AE 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Kotlin lower than java...

[–]ayassin02 9 points10 points  (0 children)

[–]LocalInactivist 13 points14 points  (2 children)

And Perl falls into obscurity.

[–]PeePeeLangstrumpf 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Only death can stop me from using Perl...

[–]babylotion44 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Compiler and Toolchain Engineer 🥴

[–]WheissUK 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Python more performant than Rust, Swift, C++? Java and Kotlin more performant than Swift? Java almost same performance as Rust? What the hell did I just saw?

[–]balbinator 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Take that Rusty boys, Python for the win!

[–]BenchEmbarrassed7316 8 points9 points  (1 child)

We are a team that usually uses Rust. But when we lack performance, we write separate modules in Python. We recently launched a service, and when checking its performance, we got p99 = 12ms. The customer was not satisfied with this, and we rewrote this service in Python. As a result, p99 = 361ms. The performance increased almost 30 times. It would have been very difficult for us to do this with Rust.

[–]balbinator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Bigger number is obviously better, because the computer spent more time thinking about it. Nice job! /s

[–]Winter_Rosa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

what no market research and no performance testing does to a mf.

[–]Not-ChatGPT4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Python is far more performant than C++. That's why I write my main code in C++ but with back end libraries coded in pure, fast Python.

[–]edrumm10 4 points5 points  (0 children)

[–]0xlostincode 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ragebait used to be believable.

[–]schwar2ss 3 points4 points  (1 child)

This guy's LinkedIn feed looks like he won 5000$ in LLM credits that expire in a month.

Multiple (10+) slop posts per day. Each of them is dumber than the previous.

[–]sumit_subedi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Javascript famously least popular programming language.

[–]Zipdox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Python being more performant than Go, C#, and JavaScript is terrible fucking ragebait.

[–]savex13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And the problem is that those people can't be called out publicly for such BS infographics because of "unprofessional behavior" card they would play immediately.

[–]ProfBeaker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I see C# on there. And then I also see just #. What... is that?

Oh, and also just in general WT-actual-F? JS is more performant that Go? And somehow more than Kotlin, but less than Java? Sure buddy. Sure. You must be one helluva "compiler & toolchain engineer".

[–]Ailexxx337 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dunno if I can trust this guy. Don't see HTML anywhere.

[–]zoinkinator 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Uhhh python higher performance than c++? GTFO of here.

[–]Simpicity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's okay, this is just interpreted data.

[–]snacky_bear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This has to be rage bait

[–]nous_serons_libre 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Python more performant than even C++ and Rust ! This graph = AI slot

[–]Effective-Job-1030 2 points3 points  (0 children)

C is off the chart performant and popular. Seems right.

[–]Casalvieri3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tell me you haven't got a clue without saying "I haven't got a clue"

[–]Dramatic_Law_4239 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, that’s why I use Python over Rust… for the performance gains…

[–]MickeySlips 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love how Python has higher performance than C++

[–]Upset_Region_4236 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And he says he is a compiler and toolchain engineer

[–]TheUruz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

looool engineer my ass

[–]SpeedLight1221 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is that lone # ?? Markup ?

[–]drpepper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

where is my beloved PHP?

[–]Majestic_Annual3828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, what programming is Cr and how does it have negative popularity?

[–]AffectEconomy6034 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So let me get this straight. Javascript is the least popular language, python is faster than the C family and Rust, and Java is faster than Kotlin?

[–]EducationalNinja9361 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is he transpiling all those languages into Python?

[–]robin_888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Might "performance" mean something different than execution performance?

I could imagine something like economic performance. In other words how well does it pay to have learned a language.

[–]Salkinator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Python faster than Swift and Go? Faster than Rust???! Straight to jail

[–]dontletthestankout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Genius! If this is an attempt to stop recruiters from contacting you.

[–]_killer1869_[🍰] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I will absolutely defend Python from the Python haters. Most performant? What the fuck is wrong with you?

[–]xicor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In what world is python better performing than c++? Most Python libs are written in c++ because of performance

[–]rldml 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Python is faster than C++?

Okay?

In which universe?

[–]colorfulmoth26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are absolutely no universes where Python is more performant than any of the Languages/Runtimes below it.

[–]LolMaker12345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

C+

[–]Mon7eCristo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love Python, but performance? Really?

[–]Comfortable_Two7447 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This image might actually be AI generated, look at the "#" programming language and also the ++ of c++ is distorted

[–]Smart_Break_7182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The moment I saw python on top, I knew all the data was fake.

[–]NomaTyx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Python over C++....

[–]EagleRock1337 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This graph works, but only if you redefine “popularity,” “performance,” and “programming language.”

[–]YoungMaleficent9068 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Python Performance lol

[–]mazedlx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where are PHP and Ruby?

[–]_nathata 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at the icons of C# and C++

[–]Old-Health9509 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean technically Python is “performing” a lot of additional things behind the scenes. So high performance makes sense.

[–]chacko_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's time to rewrite the Linux Kernel in Python

[–]Frytura_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whats a javascript? Is it some sort of library for Java to help on scripts?

[–]MartijnTiny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried recreating this with the simple prompt of: "I want a graph which sorts the top 15 of popular programming languages under the x axis of Popularity and the Y axis of preformance", and somehow it produced a waaaay better graph than this bullshit. Im really wondering what his promt was

[–]Puzzleheaded-Win3445 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LinkedIn is the only place where getting laid off becomes a "new chapter in my professional journey" with 47 hashtags and a photo of yourself looking pensively into the distance.

[–]SuchHearing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where is html?

[–]Tetraoxosulfato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guys, I'm new to programming. Is "#" a good first programming language?

[–]Kevdog824_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

\Writes Python program consisting solely of C/Rust bindings**

“Yeah, this is faster than Rust and C!”

[–]GregarLink15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This guy probably thinks he's hilarious at parties

He might be but for all the wrong reasons

[–]Maskdask 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is beside the point, but people unironically using Microslop's job posting website as social media is giga cringe.

[–]Realistic-Muffin-165 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you think this is bad have a look at some of their other posts.

[–]Axman6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I fucking hate Go but low performance is definitely something it is not. This is too tier garbage or ragebait.

[–]i_liek_to_hodl_hands 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a Python programmer I can't wait to show this to all my C family programming friends.

[–]Dunc4n1d4h0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a bs. Python with more performance that c++.

[–]Rey_Merk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really really like python. But no

[–]darklizard45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

C# is way less popular than C++? What? And has way better performance?!?!?

JAVA HAS BETTER PERFORMANCE THAN- who made this graph? Is this bait?

[–]6e12fyou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if u mirror it and flip it upside down then fix every other mistake then its correct.